STATE-BY-STATE Enotarization CHART
STATE-BY-STATE eNOTARIZATION CHART STATE Is eNotarization (Not Remote) Permitted? Alabama Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. Alaska Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. Arizona Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. Arkansas Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. California Yes, under UETA and Code 27391 (e), only in counties that eRecord subject to regulations. Colorado Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. Connecticut Yes, only in counties that eRecord subject to regulations. Delaware Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. District of Columbia Yes, under UETA in counties, only that eRecord. Florida Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. Georgia Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. eNotary bill pending. Hawaii No. Idaho Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. Illinois Yes, under state Electronic Transaction Act, only in counties that eRecord. Indiana Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. Iowa Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. Kansas Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. Kentucky No. Louisiana No. eNotary study pending. Maine Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. Maryland Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. Bill pending. Massachusetts Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. Michigan Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. Minnesota Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations. Mississippi Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. Missouri Yes, under UETA, only in counties that eRecord. Montana Yes, only in counties that eRecord, subject to regulations.
[Show full text]