DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright and Cultural Memory: Digital Conference Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyright and Cultural Memory: Digital Conference Proceedings Copyright and Cultural Memory: Digital Conference Proceedings Deazley, R., & Wallace, A. (Eds.) (2017). Copyright and Cultural Memory: Digital Conference Proceedings. CREATe. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.345968 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2017 The Authors. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:03. Oct. 2021 CREATe Working Paper 2017/03 (March 2017) Copyright and Cultural Memory Digital Conference Proceedings 9 June, 2016 – The Lighthouse, Glasgow Editors Ronan Deazley Andrea Wallace Queen’s University Belfast University of Glasgow [email protected] [email protected] CREATe Working Paper Series DOI:10.5281/zenodo.345968 This release was supported by the RCUK funded Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe), AHRC Grant Number AH/K000179/1. COPYRIGHT AND CULTURAL MEMORY Digital Conference Proceedings 9 June 2016, The Lighthouse Copyright and Cultural Memory: Digital Conference Proceedings How does copyright impact the access to and use of our shared cultural herit- age across borders, and online? This document presents an edited transcript of a one-day conference designed to explore this essential question. 'Copyright and Cultural Memory', organised by CREATe and held at The Lighthouse on 9 June 2016, addressed a number of copyright-related issues in the heritage sector. CREATe researchers Ronan Deazley (Queen's University Belfast), Megan Blakely, Kerry Patterson, Victoria Stobo, and Andrea Wallace (all Postgraduate Researchers at the University of Glasgow) addressed the challenges of digitisation, intangible cultural heritage, risk-based models of copyright compliance for archive collections, and surro- gate intellectual property rights. The conference featured presentations by CREATe Postgraduate Researchers followed by a discussion with a panel of experts. Afterwards, keynote speak- er Simon Tanner (King's College London) responded to the research. The day concluded with a question and answer session reflecting on the research pre- sented and the role of copyright law and policy in the heritage domain. This document captures those presentations, along with the panel discussion and question and answer session that followed, in a citable format. This event was funded by CREATe, University of Glasgow, the Research Coun- cils UK Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Econo- my (www.create.ac.uk), AHRC Grant Number AH/K000179/1. CREATe receives funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council, the Economic and Social Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. CC BY 4.0 - [Author, Title, in Copyright and Cultural Memory: Digital Conference Proceedings, eds. Ronan Deazley and Andrea Wallace, 2017.] #CaCM2016 This publication is issued in conjunction with the Copyright and Cultural Mem- ory Conference held at The Lighthouse in Glasgow on 9 June 2016 and made available online as a resource at http://www.create.ac.uk/cacm2016. Video presentations from the event can be viewed at: http://www.create.ac.uk/ cacm2016/videos Graphic design by Andrea Wallace Table of Contents Presentations Megan Blakely GLAMourishing Intangible Cultural Heritage 1 Kerry Patterson 'But when are they to be published?' Digitising the Edwin Morgan Scrapbooks 13 Victoria Stobo Copyright, Digtisation and Risk: Taking risks with archive collections 26 Andrea Wallace 'Display At Your Own Risk' & 'CopyThat': Examining misconnections between cultural institutions and users 39 Response Panel Discussion Alison and Alistair McCleery, Ben White, Naomi Korn, Joris Pekel, and Margaret Haig 60 Keynote Simon Tanner Threads of Culture, Threads of Discourse 77 Q&A With presenters 91 COPYRIGHT AND CULTURAL MEMORY The Lighthouse, Glasgow // 9 June 2016 Megan Rae Blakely GLAMourising Intangible Cultural Heritage Good morning. I’m Megan Blakely, and I am going to start off the programme today by talking about intangible cultural heritage and intellectual property. Since we are in this gallery setting, I Figure 1 wanted to focus on the GLAM sector, and sometimes it helps to start our morning with a pun, so we will be talking ‘GLAMourising’ Signposts intangible cultural heritage. • Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) and Intel- The way we're going to proceed this morning is by starting with lectual Property (IP) » Definitions and legal challenges definitions and challenges (Fig. 1). The law functions by defining » TRIPs, the CDPA, and the EU Directives and making boundaries, and intangible cultural heritage by its na- » 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding ture needs to expand, to be living, to evolve and to reflect the of ICH identity of the practising community. That will be the first thing » Penumbras: Developed countries (WTO), that I will start to take a look at. unions, and intangible cultural heritage Then I will talk a little bit about the process that happens when • Tangification: Where are GLAM institu- tions situated? intangible cultural heritage changes form in order to be proper- tised as it does with intellectual property, where exclusionary • Case Studies: IP systems and Norms in ownership can impose limits on this type of heritage, and look at Celtic-derived Developed Countries a few case studies in the UK. I focus specifically on Celtic-derived • Concluding Thoughts: What does this countries just to narrow the focus, in particular, on the developed mean for GLAM? countries of Ireland, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales. These are jurisdictions that are generally more focused on intellectual property development and less on cultural policy. I’ll talk a little bit about that as well. Then I will wrap up with just a few concluding thoughts about what this means for GLAM. create.ac.uk/cacm2016 // 1 Figure 2 So, culture-producing versus knowledge-producing: we are divid- ‘Knowledge-producing’ v ‘culture-produc- ed between the global north and south (Fig. 2). The global north ing’: the false dichotomy seems to be more focused on knowledge producing in the law. This slide is not meant to be an exhaustive list of the interna- tional instruments that have been put into place in the field of intellectual property and culture, but it is meant to illustrate chronologically how these two legal systems have developed independently of each other. Even from 1886 with the Berne Convention for Artistic and Literary Works, you have the Hague Convention for Cultural Property, and they sort of develop in two different streams and don't cross over much as far as interna- tional instruments go. Figure 3 The main Convention that deals with intangible cultural heritage • Precursors to the 2003 Convention for was put together in 2003, came into force in 2006: the Conven- the Safeguarding of ICH in International tion for Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage (Fig. 3). And Law: » The Berne Convention: “Protection” you'll notice that there was an intentional word choice here with » The World Heritage Convention: “Pro- this Convention using ‘safeguarding’ as opposed to the language tecting and preserving” that you see with the Berne Convention using ‘protection.’ The » TRIPS: “Protection”, “private rights” World Heritage Convention, which focuses on monuments or • The 2003 ICH Convention as a response: non-moveable heritage such as landmarks or symphony thea- » Art. 2(3): “Safeguarding” tres, these sorts of things, uses the terminology ‘protecting and conserving,’ and TRIPs, which is the strongest intellectual prop- • Legal position of developed countries in erty convention, also uses the terminology ‘protecting’. So there unions ‒ devolved rights is literature about how ‘safeguarding’ was meant to reflect the different nature of what the Convention addressed. create.ac.uk/cacm2016 // 2 Figure 4 Since we have people here from a law background and also from Intangible Cultural Heritage and the 2003 a culture background, I'll try to touch just a little bit on the defi- Convention for the Safeguarding of ICH nitions of each (Fig. 4). Intangible cultural heritage is defined by the Convention as ‘the practices, representations, expressions, knowledge, skills of communities, groups including the objects, artefacts and cultural spaces that individuals recognise as a part of their cultural heritage.’ It also provides a sense of community and identity. If any of you are lawyers, you can see how this might be problematic if you were trying to write some kind of statute or law surrounding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Andrea Wallace Queen’S University Belfast University of Glasgow [email protected] [email protected]
    CREATe Working Paper 2017/03 (March 2017) Copyright and Cultural Memory Digital Conference Proceedings 9 June, 2016 – The Lighthouse, Glasgow Editors Ronan Deazley Andrea Wallace Queen’s University Belfast University of Glasgow [email protected] [email protected] CREATe Working Paper Series DOI:10.5281/zenodo.345968 This release was supported by the RCUK funded Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe), AHRC Grant Number AH/K000179/1. COPYRIGHT AND CULTURAL MEMORY Digital Conference Proceedings 9 June 2016, The Lighthouse Copyright and Cultural Memory: Digital Conference Proceedings How does copyright impact the access to and use of our shared cultural herit- age across borders, and online? This document presents an edited transcript of a one-day conference designed to explore this essential question. 'Copyright and Cultural Memory', organised by CREATe and held at The Lighthouse on 9 June 2016, addressed a number of copyright-related issues in the heritage sector. CREATe researchers Ronan Deazley (Queen's University Belfast), Megan Blakely, Kerry Patterson, Victoria Stobo, and Andrea Wallace (all Postgraduate Researchers at the University of Glasgow) addressed the challenges of digitisation, intangible cultural heritage, risk-based models of copyright compliance for archive collections, and surro- gate intellectual property rights. The conference featured presentations by CREATe Postgraduate Researchers followed by a discussion with a panel of experts. Afterwards, keynote speak- er Simon Tanner (King's College London) responded to the research. The day concluded with a question and answer session reflecting on the research pre- sented and the role of copyright law and policy in the heritage domain.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Virgin Money London Marathon 2020 Virgin Money London Marathon 1
    2020 Virgin Money London Marathon 2020 Virgin Money London Marathon 1 CONTENTS 01 MEDIA INFORMATION Page 5 ELITE MEN 42 The Events & Start Times 6 Entries 42 Media Team Contacts 6 Awards & Bonuses 42 Media Facilities 6 Preview 43 Press Conferences 6 Biographies 44 The London Marathon Online 7 Olympic Qualifying Standard 54 Essential Facts 8 What’s New in 2020 10 ELITE WHEELCHAIR PREVIEW 55 The Course 11 Wheelchair Athletes 56 Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust 11 Abbott World Marathon Elite Race Route Map 12 Majors Accumulator 56 Pace Guide 13 T54 Women Entries 56 Running a Sustainable Marathon 14 Biographies 57 London Marathon Events Limited 15 T54 Men Entries 59 Biographies 60 02 THE 40TH RACE 16 How It All Began 17 05 ABBOTT WORLD Four Decades of Marathon Moments 19 MARATHON MAJORS 65 The Ever Presents 23 How It Works 66 Qualifying Races 67 03 CHARITIES, FUNDRAISING AbbottWMM Wanda Age Group & THE TRUST 25 World Championships 67 Charities & Fundraising 26 The Abbott World Marathon 2020 Charity of the Year – Mencap 27 Majors Races 68 The London Marathon Charitable Trust 33 Abbott World Marathon Majors Series XIII (2019/20) 74 04 ELITE RACES 31 Abbott World Marathon Majors Wheelchair Series 76 ELITE WOMEN 32 Entries 32 Awards & Bonuses 32 Preview 33 Biographies 34 CONTENTS CONTINUED >> 2020 Virgin Money London Marathon 2 06 THE MASS EVENT 79 BRITISH MARATHON STATISTICS 119 Starters & Finishers 80 British All-Time Top 20 119 2020 Virgin Money British Record Progression 120 London Marathon Virtual Race Stats 81 The Official Virgin Money
    [Show full text]
  • Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report
    Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report Statement on Intellectual Property Rights and Open Access relevant to the digitization and restitution of African Cultural Heritage and associated materials by Dr Mathilde Pavis and Dr Andrea Wallace 25 March 2019 © 2019 Mathilde Pavis and Andrea Wallace Everybody may disseminate this article by electronic means and make it available for download under the terms and conditions of the Digital Peer Publishing Licence (DPPL). A copy of the license text may be obtained at http://nbn-resolving. de/urn:nbn:de:0009-dppl-v3-en8. Recommended citation: Mathilde Pavis and Andrea Wallace, Statement: Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report, 10 (2019) JIPITEC 115 para 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY demands are not made of its own national institutions. 1 This response challenges the recommendations made by the Sarr-Savoy Report to systematically • Third, restitution must not be conditioned digitize and make available online as “open access” upon any obligations to allow the digitization all of the African Cultural Heritage designated for of materials held in France and open access restitution. Instead, we write to acknowledge the commitments. Such decisions around digitization complex issues regarding intellectual property rights (including the waiver of any rights for open and open access policies around these materials, access purposes) are cultural and curatorial and we call on the French Government to dedicate prerogatives. Accordingly, they must be made further resources to researching and co-developing by African communities of origin, as they impact digitization solutions with African communities of how heritage may be represented, preserved, origin.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 2017 Soroptimist News
    AUGUST 2017 Soroptimist News Featured Objective: Food Security and Healthcare Featured Objective: Environmental Sustainability SIGBI Conference in Cardiff Book now! • Membership Month reports! • SIGBI Board 2017-19: More Directors’ applications • SIGBI Conference: last chance to book! Women inspiring action, transforming lives www.sigbi.org Welcome to Soroptimist News from the Editor Soroptimist International The big news for this issue has to be Our focus is also on two SIGBI Great Britain and Ireland (SIGBI) Ltd. the SIGBI Conference, which is hurtling Programme Objectives, the bedrock Company Number: 07058666 towards us in a rapidly disappearing year! of Soroptimism – Food Security Your Conference team is doing an and Healthcare and Environmental Soroptimist International Great Britain & Ireland amazing job, creating a fascinating Sustainability. is an organisation in Special Consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social programme of speakers and entertainment These Objectives are both critical in the Council (UN ECOSOC) since July 2013. This is that will set Cardiff City alight, it really does battle to improve the lives of women across in addition to the General Consultative status look like a great event, just read through the world. We all know what they are but held by the umbrella organisation Soroptimist our feature on Page 8. are we all playing our part in that battle? International. Soroptimist International is a recognised Non-Governmental Organisation There’s still time to book if you haven’t We also bring you news of membership (NGO) representing women from all over the already done so, and I daresay that many Month, which inspired many of you to world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bells and Ringers of All Saints' Church
    THE BELLS AND RINGERS OF ALL SAINTS’ CHURCH LLANBRADACH SOUTH WALES (Now hung in Kingstone, Herefordshire) by Andrew Giles BSc (Hons) Published and Printed by Andrew Giles 1999 ISBN………………………….. All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this book may be made without written permission of the Author 1 CONTENTS Page 3 Introduction 5 Chapter 1 1911 – 1939 20 Chapter 2 1940 – 1951 25 Chapter 3 1952 – 1981 29 Chapter 4 1982 – 1985 42 Chapter 5 1986 – 1996 50 Conclusion 51 Appendix 1 Ringers Rules and Regulations 1912 54 Appendix 2 Expenses Incurred 1910 - 1951 56 Appendix 3 Local Ringers 1911 – 1986 58 Appendix 4 Peals 62 Appendix 5 Peal Ringers List 64 Appendix 6 Quarter Peals 74 Appendix 7 Quarter Peal Ringers List 78 Appendix 8 Bellringing Terminology 80 Acknowledgements 2 INTRODUCTION This book has been written primarily to document the history of the bells and ringers from 1911 to 1996, 10 years after the Church of All Saints’ Llanbradach was closed. However, I hope it will to appeal to ringers and non ringers especially those interested in what is a relatively small part of the village’s history. Technical ringing terms or ‘jargon’ are used without apology, but explanations of common bellringing terms can be found in Appendix 8. This book traces the history of the bells from installation to removal and relocation, and also looks at some of the notable performances that were achieved on them during their 75 years in the tower. It explores the local ringer’s activities and some 77 people have been identified as taking an active part in the local ringing during three distinct periods 1911 – 1934; 1945-1951 and 1982-1986.
    [Show full text]
  • April 3, 2020 Director General Francis Gurry World Intellectual
    April 3, 2020 Director General Francis Gurry World Intellectual Property Organization 34, chemin des Colombettes CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland Dear Dr. Gurry, We write to you as organisations and individuals representing researchers, educators, students, and the institutions that support them, to encourage WIPO to take a clear stand in favour of ensuring that intellectual property regimes are a support, and not a hindrance, to efforts to tackle both the Coronavirus outbreak and its consequences. The COVID-19 pandemic has shone a bright light on how important intellectual property limitations and exceptions can be to development and human flourishing. Researchers discovered the spread of the virus through a text and data mining project analyzing copyrighted news articles1, enabled by Canada’s flexible fair dealing right for research purposes. The earliest potential treatments have been developed through existing medicines, enabled by experimental use exceptions to patent rights. Now, schools, universities, libraries, archives, museums and research institutes across the world, forced to close their buildings, are transferring materials online and providing remote access, but only where copyright laws permit. However, these and other critical activities to overcome the crisis are not being performed everywhere - including where subscriptions have been paid in advance - because they are not lawful everywhere. We have seen helpful steps from a number of countries, and from some right holders themselves, to facilitate access to academic articles and other works, educational and cultural materials, research data, chemical libraries, and needed medicines and medical devices that are subject to intellectual property rights. These steps are to be lauded. But much more is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • World Athletics Half Marathon Championships Facts & Figures
    WORLD ATHLETICS HALF MARATHON CHAMPIONSHIPS FACTS & FIGURES Incorporating the World Athletics Half Marathon Championships (1992-2005/2008-2010-2012-2014-2016-2018) World Athletics Road Running Championships 2006/2007 Past Championships...............................................................................................1 Championship Records ..........................................................................................1 Past Medallists .......................................................................................................1 Overall Placing Table..............................................................................................6 Most Medals Won...................................................................................................7 Youngest & Oldest..................................................................................................8 Most Appearances by Athlete.................................................................................8 Most Appearances by Country ...............................................................................9 Country Index .......................................................................................................11 World & Area Road Records and Best Performances .........................................43 Progression of World & Area Road Records and Best Performances ..................47 National Records and Best Performances at Half Marathon ...............................52 Doping Disqualifications at the World Athletics
    [Show full text]
  • BMC News 4 - 5 BMC News Is Published Twice Yearly in April and November by the British UK Merit Rankings 1999 20 - 22 Milers’ Club
    BMC NEWS Official Journal of the British Milers’ Club VOLUME 3 ISSUE 9 SPRING 2000 £10.00 The British Milers’ Club sponsored by NIKE Founded 1963 Contents .... BMC VISION 2000 “to strive to win all four middle distance gold medals for Britain in the 2000 Olympics and at each successive games” OFFICERS President Lt Col Glen Grant TRAINING Chairman Dr Norman Poole Vice Chairmen Maureen Smith Nic Andrews Jason Henderson 6 - 8 Matthew Fraser Moat National Secretary Peter Thompson, Training Myths Destroyed Frank Horwill 28 - 29 PO Box 34, Tewkesbury, GL20 5YF Maximising your potential Frank Horwill 29 Treasurer Pat Fitzgerald, 47 Station Road, Afraid to Race Brendan Hackett 30 Cowley, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3AB Membership Secretary William Anderson, 49 Paulsgrove Road, Kim McDonald Jason Henderson 38 - 39 North End, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO2 7HP A Question of Talent Frank Horwill 40 National Committee Frank Horwill, BMC Founder 1963, Tim Brennan, Val Brandon, Liam Cain, Training at Various Ages Frank Horwill 41 Ian Chalk, Peter Coe, Mike Down, A Bit in Reserve Derek Parker 45 David Iszatt, Steve Mosley, Philip O‚Dell, Catherine Dugdale and all Race Organisers. Honorary Auditor Mike Rezin VISION 2000 RACE ORGANISERS Vision 2000 Statistics Matthew Fraser Moat 9 2000 BMC NIKE GRAND PRIX Vision 2000 Interview Matthew Fraser Moat 10 - 11 BMC Directors Tim Brennan 01628 415 748 Steve Mosley 029 2030 6733 Kelly Holmes Trevor Frecknall 12 - 13 2000 BA ENDURANCE INITIATIVE John Mayock Jason Henderson 14 - 15 BMC Director Mike Down 0117 9733 407 James
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Science, Culture and the Law at Exeter University of Exeter, Exeter Law School Amory Building Exeter EX4 4RJ United Kingdom
    The Centre for Science, Culture and the Law at Exeter University of Exeter, Exeter Law School Amory Building Exeter EX4 4RJ United Kingdom To: UN Expert Mechanism on the Re: Report on Repatriation of Rights of Indigenous Peoples ceremonial objects and human [email protected] remains under the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Submission of The Centre for Science, Culture and the Law at the University of Exeter Dr Mathilde Pavis and Dr Andrea Wallace | University of Exeter, UK 1. INTRODUCTION We bring the Expert Mechanism’s attention to the importance of intellectual property and related rights (IPR) to the repatriation of ceremonial objects and human remains, and to the implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, articles 11, 12 and 31). With this in mind, this submission outlines key aspects of IPR for states, cultural heritage institutions and Indigenous peoples to consider in the context of repatriation. This submission also proposes a step-by-step strategy around IPR repatriation. IPR may come in the form of copyright (or authors’ rights), performers’ rights and other neighbouring rights, database rights, patents, plant breeders’ rights, rights associated with traditional cultural expressions (TCE), traditional knowledge (TK) or sui generis protection of genetic resources.1 This list is not exhaustive and further protection may be implemented by national jurisdictions in addition to the conventional IPR listed above. It is important to highlight that IPR in
    [Show full text]
  • 2 | 2019 Volume 10 (2019) Issue 2 ISSN 2190-3387
    2 | 2019 Volume 10 (2019) Issue 2 ISSN 2190-3387 Editorial by Gerald Spindler Statements Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report/ Réponse au Rapport Sarr-Savoy Law and Electronic Commerce Information Technology, Intellectual Property, Journal of by Mathilde Pavis and Andrea Wallace Articles Fixing Copyright Reform: A Better Solution to Online Infringement by Christina Angelopoulos and João Pedro Quintais On Upload-Filters and other Competitive Advantages for Big Tech Companies under Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market by Thomas Spoerri Recht der öffentlichen Werkwiedergabe im harmonisierten Urheberrecht by Helmut Haberstumpf Game-theoretical Model on the GDPR - Market for Lemons? by Tim Zander, Anne Steinbrück and Pascal Birnstill Big Data in the Insurance Industry: Leeway and Limits for Individualising Insurance Contracts by Florent Thouvenin, Fabienne Suter, Damian George and Rolf H. Weber Access to Data in Connected Cars and the Recent Reform of the Motor Vehicle Type Approval Regulation by Wolfgang Kerber and Daniel Gill Different ‘Rules of the Game’ – Impact of National Court Systems on Patent Litigation in the EU and the Need for New Perspectives by Tamar Khuchua Book Review Kraus, Daniel/Obrist, Thierry/Hari, Olivier, Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organisation and the Law by Gerald Spindler Editors: Thomas Dreier Axel Metzger Gerald Spindler Lucie Guibault Miquel Peguera www.jipitec.eu Séverine Dusollier Chris Reed Karin Sein Table Of Contents Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Editorial Electronic Commerce Law by Gerald Spindler 114 Volume 10 Issue 2 October 2019 www.jipitec.eu [email protected] A joint publication of: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY of the GREAT NORTH RUN the Morrisons Great North Run Is
    THE HISTORY OF THE GREAT NORTH RUN The Morrisons Great North Run is the premier event in the Great Run series and is firmly established as the world’s most popular half marathon. 1981 Less than 5000 runners were expected to take part in the inaugural race – held on Sunday June 28 – therefore organisers were astounded when over 12500 applied and over 10000 of them completed the first Great North Run. Winner of the half marathon, from Newcastle to South Shields, was local international Mike McLeod. Three years before he won the Olympic 10 000m silver medal, the Elswick Harrier crossed the line in 63 minutes 23 seconds. The local police estimated over 200000 spectators lined the route as he beat Norway’s Oyvind Dahl by the huge margin of 1 minute 11 seconds. Former South Shields Harrier, Karen Goldhawk of the Royal Air Force, made it a great day for North East athletics by winning the Women’s race in 77 minutes 36 seconds. 1982 After the brilliant success of the previous year, more than 50000 fun runners applied for 20000 available places. Producing another great run, Mike McLeod won in 62 minutes 44 seconds, the fastest time ever achieved for a half marathon in Great Britain. The first woman across the line was London Olympiad’s Margaret Lockley, who clocked 77 minutes 43 seconds. 1983 A year before winning the Olympic marathon title, Carlos Lopez became the first overseas winner of the Great North Run. The Portugese athlete ran in 62 minutes 46 seconds, beating British schoolteacher Ray Smedley, who finished in 64 minutes 34 seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • Aims 1982 – 2007
    THE OFFICIAL SILVER JUBILEE PUBLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL MARATHONS AND ROAD RACES © www.photorun.net AIMSAIMS 19821982 –– 2007:2007: 2525 YearsYears ofof RunningRunning HistoryHistory Distance Running Archive © Mark Shearman CONTENTS Words of greeting from Hiroaki Chosa, 1991 – 1995: President of AIMS 4 Consolidation 24 – 31 Words of greeting from Lamine Diack, Hiroaki Chosa 27 President of IAAF 5 The AIMS Marathon-Museum THE STORY OF AIMS of Running 31 1982 – 1984: 1996 – 2000: The birth of a movement 6 – 15 Anticipating the millennium 32 – 39 AIMS – then, now and the future 9 Hugh Jones 35 Will Cloney 10 Great moments in AIMS races 39 Fred Lebow 12 2001 – 2006: Chris Brasher 13 Reaching new heights 40 – 47 The development Allan Steinfeld 42 of road race measurement 14 – 15 World records for road races 44 John Jewell 14 Running into the future 47 1985 – 1990: Spreading the word 16 – 23 1982 – 2007: AIMS listings 48 – 66 Bob Dalgleish 19 AIMS races and winners over 25 years 50 – 63 Andy Galloway 20 AIMS Congresses, Board Members and Board Meetings 64 David Martin 21 AIMS members today 65 – 66 The International Marathon Medical Directors Association 22 AIMS Sponsors 67 PRODUCTION www.aims-association.org Editors: Hugh Jones, Jörg Wenig • Contributors: Paco Borao, Andy Galloway, David Martin, Horst Milde, Allan Steinfeld, Gerd Steins • Photos: Distance Running Archive, Victah Sailer (www.photorun.net), Sports Museum Berlin, AIMS Marathon-Museum of Running, AIMS race organisers • Production: Gary Friar • Design: Thomas Kattwinkel • Printing: In Position Media, Glasgow. 3 25 YEARS OF AIMS 1982 TO 2007 Words of greeting from Hiroaki Chosa, President of AIMS Dear friends, On the 25th anniversary of AIMS I am pleased to included Fred Lebow of New York, Will Cloney of express my most hearty congratulations to each and Boston and Chris Brasher of London who also took every member of our Association.
    [Show full text]