The Distribution of Pariambus Typicus Var. Inermis Mayer (Amphipoda, Caprellidae) on the Common Starfish Asterias Rubens L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Distribution of Pariambus Typicus Var. Inermis Mayer (Amphipoda, Caprellidae) on the Common Starfish Asterias Rubens L THE DISTRIBUTION OF PARIAMBUS TYPICUS VAR. INERMIS MAYER (AMPHIPODA, CAPRELLIDAE) ON THE COMMON STARFISH ASTERIAS RUBENS L. BY M. B. JONES Department of Zoology, University College of Swansea, Wales, Great Britain INTRODUCTION Although the association of Pariambus typicus (Kroyer) (Amphipoda, Caprelli- dae) with Asterias rubens Linnaeus, 1758, has been recorded by a number of authors ( Cuenot, 1912; Chevreux & Fage, 1925 ; Mortensen, 1927; Harrison, 1944; Marine Biological Association, 1957), none of them refer to which of the varieties of this species was involved. The two varieties of P. typicus likely to occur in Britain are var. armata Mayer, 1903, and P. typicus var. inermis Mayer, 1903, which can be separated anatomically on the form of the third segment of the peduncle of the first antenna, and the second gnathopod of the males (see Sars, 1895; Chevreux & Fage, 1927; Harrison, 1944). P. typicus var. inermis has not been recorded in Britain previously. This paper reports on the frequency distribu- tion of P. ty PiCl4J var. inermis, newly recorded in Britain, on A. rubens, and compares the association with that between the newly described Caprella grahami Wigley & Shave (Caprellidae) and the North American starfish Asterias forbesi (Desor) (Wigley & Shave, 1966; Patton, 1968). MATERIALAND METHODS Starfish were collected from a large population of A. rubens under the pier at Mumbles, Swansea during August, September and October 1967. They were placed separately into polythene bags and each bag sealed with a rubber band. In the laboratory the starfish were measured, the aboral surface graded for colour using a simple light, medium or dark scale, sexed, and examined for caprellids. The position of each caprellid on the starfish was noted. RESULTS The variety of P. typicus found on A. rubens at Mumbles was identified in all cases as inermis Mayer and this is its first definite record in British waters and on A. rubens. A total of 942 caprellids was collected from 150 starfish. Their frequency distribution was plotted and compared with the theoretical curve for a random 90 distribution (i.e., Poisson Curve) (fig. 1). The observed distribution does not fit the theoretical curve and the differences between observed and expected values are too large to be attributable to sampling variation. The large percentages of starfish with 0 and high numbers of caprellids, and the low percentage of starfish with intermediate numbers suggests that the caprellids are aggregated in their occurrence, i.e. they show a "clumped distribution" (see Mather, 1967). There does not appear to be a relationship between the diameter of a starfish and the Fig. 1. The observed percentage frequency of occurrence of the numbers of Pariambus typicus var. inermis Mayer on each Asteriaf rubens L. plotted against the expected Poisson distribution. number of caprellids found on it (fig. 2) but in general the smaller starfish lack any infection by caprellids (fig. 3). During the three month collection period the - - percentages of infection of the starfish were August 50%, September 67%, - and October 52qo. Each collection contained caprellids of all sizes, including small juveniles and ovigerous females. The incidence of the caprellids could not be related to the sex or the colour of the aboral surface of the starfish. DISCUSSION This investigation carried out on a single population of starfish reveals that the caprellids are aggregated on to certain starfish and are not randomly distri- buted. The absence of a planktonic larval stage in the life-cycle of Pariambtls may partly account for the clumped distribution, since the young are retained in the brood lamellae of the females and are released as miniature adults. Most young probably stay on the same starfish resulting in the observed clumped distribution, .
Recommended publications
  • Linnaeus, 1758) (Ophiuroidea, Echinodermata)
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 393 (2010) 176–181 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Sediment preference and burrowing behaviour in the sympatric brittlestars Ophiura albida Forbes, 1839 and Ophiura ophiura (Linnaeus, 1758) (Ophiuroidea, Echinodermata) Karin Boos a,⁎, Lars Gutow b, Roger Mundry c, Heinz-Dieter Franke a a Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, PO Box 180, 27483 Helgoland, Germany b Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, PO Box 12 01 61, 27515 Bremerhaven, Germany c Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany article info abstract Article history: Ophiura albida and Ophiura ophiura are widespread and highly abundant brittlestar species occurring Received 11 May 2010 sympatrically on soft bottoms along the western European coasts. Laboratory choice experiments revealed Received in revised form 23 July 2010 that O. albida preferred staying on fine rather than on coarse sediments, whereas O. ophiura did not Accepted 26 July 2010 distinguish between these types of sediment. Sediment-specific burrowing behaviour of the two species was investigated under different stress and food conditions in order to evaluate relations of predator avoidance Keywords: and feeding strategies with the observed sediment preference. In the presence of a predator, O. albida Brittlestars fi Burrowing burrowed preferentially in ne sediment while coarse sediment did not seem to support quick burrowing for Feeding behaviour efficient escape. Conversely, O. ophiura tended to escape the predator by fleeing across the sediment surface Predation rather than by burrowing, reflecting its unselectivity towards different sediment types.
    [Show full text]
  • A Seafloor Crater in the German Bight and Its Effects on the Benthos
    Helgol Mar Res (1999) 53:36–44 © Springer-Verlag and AWI 1999 ORIGINAL ARTICLE S. Thatje · D. Gerdes · E. Rachor A seafloor crater in the German Bight and its effects on the benthos Received: 12 June 1998 / Accepted:16 September 1998 Abstract In 1963 a deep crater was formed about 65 m of the crater’s influence on the benthic regime. The ques- below sea level in the western part of the German Bight, tions to be answered are: due to a gas eruption caused by drilling carried out from – How are the sedimentation rates in the crater? the platform ‘Mr. Louie’. The study area is situated in a – How is the benthic association in the crater structured sandy to muddy bottom area inhabited by an Amphiura compared with the surrounding A. filiformis associa- filiformis association (sensu Salzwedel et al. 1985). The tion? crater, sometimes called ‘Figge-Maar’, functions as a – Are meroplanktic larvae enriched in the crater? sediment trap, concentrating particles and organisms – What is the fate of new colonizers in the crater? from the water column, thus leading to extreme sedimen- – What is the effect of sedimentation on the benthic tation rates of about 50 cm, on average, per year. Crater community in the crater? stations, compared with stations situated in the vicinity, show enrichments of juveniles. Echinoderms, especially There is evidence that this bottom anomaly affects the the subsurface-dwelling heart urchin Echinocardium cor- bentho-pelagic coupling by acting like a sediment trap, datum and ophiuroids are responsive to enrichment. Oth- thus concentrating seston and plankton organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of BIODIVERSITY in the MEDITERRANEAN (2-3 P
    UNEP(DEC)/MED WG.231/18 17 April 2003 ENGLISH MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN Meeting of the MED POL National Coordinators Sangemini, Italy, 27 - 30 May 2003 STRATEGIC ACTION PROGRAMME GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT OF ECOLOGICAL STATUS AND STRESS REDUCTION INDICATORS FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION In cooperation with UNEP Athens, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 2. AIMS OF THE REPORT .............................................................................................. 2 3. STATE OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN............................................. 2 Species Diversity................................................................................................................. 2 Ecosystems/Communities .................................................................................................. 3 Pelagic ............................................................................................................................... 3 Benthic ............................................................................................................................... 4 4. ECOSYSTEM CHANGES DUE TO ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACT............................... 6 Microbial contamination...................................................................................................... 6 Industrial pollution .............................................................................................................. 6 Oil
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for Interpreting Types of Marine Habitat for The
    SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 09 Background 09 Some reminders about marine ecology 10 List of Mediterranean benthic biocenoses 10 Bibliographical references 11 I - SUPRALITTORAL STAGE I.2. SANDS I.2.1. Biocenosis of supralittoral sands 12 I.2.1.5. Facies with washed-up phanerogams (upper part) 14 II - MEDIOLITTORAL STAGE II.1. MUDS, SANDY MUDS AND SANDS OF LAGOONSAND ESTUARIES II.1.1. Biocenosis of muddy sands and muds 16 II.1.1.1. Association with halophytes 18 II.1.1.2. Facies of saltworks 20 II.3. STONES AND PEBBLES II.3.1. Biocenosis of mediolittoral detritic bottoms 22 II.3.1.1. Facies with banks of dead leaves of Posidonia oceanica and other phanerogams 24 II.4. HARD BEDS AND ROCKS II.4. 1. Biocenosis of the upper mediolittoral rock 26 II.4.1.3. Association with Nemalion helminthoides and Rissoella verruculosa 28 II.4.1.4. Association with Lithophyllum papillosum and Polysiphonia spp 30 II.4.2. Biocenosis of the lower mediolittoral rock 32 II.4.2.1. Association with Lithophyllum lichenoides (=L. tortuosum rim) 34 II.4.2.5. Facies with Pollicipes cornucopiae 36 II.4.2.7. The association with Fucus virsoides 38 II.4.2.8. Neogoniolithon brassica-forida concretion 40 II.4.2.10. Pools and lagoons sometimes associated with Vermetids (infralittoral enclave) See sheet III.6.1.3. Facies with Vermetids 90 I.4.3. Mediolittoral caves 42 II.4.3.1. Association with Phymatolithon lenormadii and Hildenbrandia rubra 44 III - INFRALITTORAL III.1. SANDY MUDS, SANDS, GRAVELS AND ROCKS IN EURYHALINE AND EURYTHERMAL ENVIRONMENT III.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 22C - Sizewell Benthic Ecology Characterisation
    The Sizewell C Project 6.3 Volume 2 Main Development Site Chapter 22 Marine Ecology and Fisheries Appendix 22C - Sizewell Benthic Ecology Characterisation Revision: 1.0 Applicable Regulation: Regulation 5(2)(a) PINS Reference Number: EN010012 May 2020 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Sizewell benthic ecology characterisation TR348 Sizewell benthic ecology NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Page 1 of 122 characterisation TR348 Sizewell benthic ecology NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Page 2 of 122 characterisation Table of contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 10 1 Context ............................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Purpose of the report................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Thematic coverage ................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Geographic coverage ............................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Data and information sources ................................................................................................... 17 1.4.1 BEEMS intertidal survey .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pariambus Typicus (Krøyer, 1845)
    Pariambus typicus (Krøyer, 1845) AphiaID: 101857 ANFÍPODE Animalia (Reino) >Arthropoda (Filo) >Crustacea (Subfilo) >Multicrustacea (Superclasse) >Malacostraca (Classe) >Eumalacostraca (Subclasse) > Peracarida (Superordem) > Amphipoda (Ordem) > Senticaudata (Subordem) > Corophiida (Infraordem) > Caprellidira (Parvordem) > Caprelloidea (Superfamilia) > Caprellidae (Familia) Hans Hillewaert, via WoRMS Hans Hillewaert © Marta Martins - CIIMAR © Marta Martins - CIIMAR 1 © Marta Martins - CIIMAR © Marta Martins - CIIMAR © Marta Martins - CIIMAR Sinónimos Podalirius typicus Krøyer, 1844 Podalirius typicus var. armata Mayer, 1903 Podalirius typicus var. cumana Mayer, 1903 Podalirius typicus var. inermis Mayer, 1903 Referências additional source Hayward, P.J.; Ryland, J.S. (Ed.). (1990). The marine fauna of the British Isles and North-West Europe: 1. Introduction and protozoans to arthropods. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK. ISBN 0-19-857356-1. 627 pp. [details] basis of record Bellan-Santini, D.; Costello, M.J. (2001). Amphipoda. in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). 2 European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels 50: pp. 295-308. [details] additional source Bachelet, G.; Dauvin, J.-C.; Sorbe, J.C. (2003). An updated checklist of marine and brackish water Amphipoda (Crustacea: Peracarida) of the southern Bay of Biscay (NE Atlantic). Cah. Biol. Mar. 44(2): 121-151 [details] additional source Muller, Y. (2004). Faune et flore du littoral du Nord, du Pas-de-Calais et de la Belgique: inventaire. [Coastal fauna and flora of the Nord, Pas-de-Calais and Belgium: inventory]. Commission Régionale de Biologie Région Nord Pas-de-Calais: France. 307 pp., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/145561.pdf [details] additional source Dyntaxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Structure of Caprellids (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Caprellidae) on Seagrasses from Southern Spain
    Helgol Mar Res (2008) 62:189–199 DOI 10.1007/s10152-008-0107-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Community structure of caprellids (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Caprellidae) on seagrasses from southern Spain A. R. González · J. M. Guerra-García · M. J. Maestre · A. Ruiz-Tabares · F. Espinosa · I. Gordillo · J. E. Sánchez-Moyano · J. C. García-Gómez Received: 10 April 2007 / Revised: 17 December 2007 / Accepted: 8 January 2008 / Published online: 5 February 2008 © Springer-Verlag and AWI 2008 Abstract The community structure of caprellids inhabiting Introduction two species of seagrass (Cymodocea nodosa and Zostera marina) was investigated on the Andalusian coast, southern Caprellids are small marine peracaridean crustaceans, Spain, using uni and multivariate analyses. Three meadows which inhabit algae, hydroids, ascidians, anthozoans, bry- were selected (Almería, AL; Málaga, MA; Cádiz, CA), and ozoans, sponges and seagrasses (McCain 1968; Guerra- changes in seagrass cover and biomass were measured from García 2001). They feed on suspended materials, prey on 2004 to 2005. Four caprellid species were found; the den- other organisms, or graze on epibiotic fauna and Xora sity of Caprella acanthifera, Phtisica marina and Pseudo- (Caine 1974; Guerra-García et al. 2002; Thiel et al. 2003), protella phasma was correlated to seagrass biomass. No and they are important prey for many coastal Wsh species such correlation was found for Pariambus typicus, probably (Caine 1987, 1989, 1991). Caprellids are morphologically because this species inhabits sediments and does not cling well adapted to cling to the substrata; with their pereopods to the seagrass leaves. We recorded a signiWcant decrease in they can Wrmly hold onto branches of algae, seagrass, bry- seagrass cover and biomass in MA due to illegal bottom ozoans and hydrozoans.
    [Show full text]
  • Suponn" BINTANG MENGULAR (OPHIUROIDEA) DI EKOSISTEM
    Oseana, Volume XXXVll, Nomor 1, Tahun 2012: 1-6 ISSN 0216-1877 BINTANG MENGULAR (OPHIUROIDEA) DI EKOSISTEM TERUMBU KARANG Oleh Suponn" ABSTRACT BRITTLE STARS (OPHIUROIDEA)ONCORAL-REEFS. Brittlestars are the group of echinoderms that are often detected living on coral reef ecosystems. These organisms are often founded to associate with other biota i.e. algae, sponges and live coral colony. This article describes the association of brittle stars with other marine biota on coral reef ecosystem. PFNDAHULUAN 2. Reef flat; merupakan daerah papa ran Ekosistem terumbu karang adalah terumbu karang yang dipengaruhi oleh ekosistem perairan dangkal yang banyak pasang surut air laut dengan kedalaman dijumpai di sepanjang garis pantai daerah tropis. kurang lebih I meter. Area ini mulai terjadi Indonesia memiliki kawasan terumbu karang perubahan komunitas dengan adanya yang luas dan memiliki potensi yang sangat beberapa koloni kecil karang, karang besar untuk dikembangkan baik dari aspek bercabang dan submasif. Fauna keanekaragaman biota yang hidup didalamnya ekhinodermata yang banyak ditemukan di maupun nilai estetika untuk aspek pariwisata area ini antara lain dari kelompok bintang (MAWARD!, 2003) laut (LinckiaJaevigata),kelompok bulu babi Ekosistem terumbu karang tersusun oleh (Echinometra mathaei) yang berscmbunyi komunitas yang hidup di dalamnya dan di karang mati, serta kelompok bintang menempati habitat tersendiri sesuai pembagian mengular (Ophiothrix sp.) yang banyak dalam ekosistem tersebut. TOMASCIK et al. ditemukan dicelah karang bercabang. (1997) membagi peoggolongao habitat biota 3. Reef crest; merupakan daerah tubir yang berdasarkan geomorfologinya antara lain: umumnya di dominasi olehjenis karang yang 1. Back reef; merupakan daerah terumbu dapat bertahan terhadap hempasan karang bagian dalam yang terlindung. gelombang air [aut.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilisation of Invertebrates Discarded from the Nephrops Fishery by Variously Selective Benthic Scavengers in the West of Scotland
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 233: 185–198, 2002 Published May 21 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Utilisation of invertebrates discarded from the Nephrops fishery by variously selective benthic scavengers in the west of Scotland M. Bergmann*, S. K. Wieczorek, P. G. Moore, R. J. A. Atkinson University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae KA28 0EG, United Kingdom ABSTRACT: Demersal trawl fisheries generate large quantities of discards which temporarily increase the amount of carrion available to benthic communities and lead to a faster energetic turn- over. This study examines the availability of discarded material to the benthos, assesses consumption times of different items and identifies scavengers attracted to those invertebrates most frequently dis- carded from Clyde Sea Nephrops trawlers. In field and laboratory trials, heavy-shelled dead whelks (Buccinum undatum, Neptunea antiqua) sank faster than softer-bodied species like cephalopods (Allotheuthis subulata, Rossia macrosoma) or echinoderms (Ophiura ophiura, Asterias rubens), mak- ing most discards available to the benthos (at ca. –60 m CD [chart datum]) within minutes after dis- carding. SCUBA and time-lapse camera observations in the Clyde Sea and Loch Sween indicated bait utilisation times between 24 and 48 h. Fast-moving animals like brachyuran crabs were the first to arrive at discard bait piles whose composition mimicked typical discards from the Clyde Sea Nephrops fishery. Bimonthly deployments of traps baited with invertebrate discards in the north of the Clyde Sea showed that A. rubens, followed by Pagurus bernhardus, Liocarcinus depurator and whelks, were the most abundant megafaunal scavengers. Fine-meshed funnel traps deployed inside those creels yielded up to 2819 amphipods per trap, with Scopelocheirus hopei and Orchomene nanus accounting for most of the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Holothurian (Echinodermata) Associations in the Azores
    NOTEMOTA CAPRELLTD (CRUSTACEA) - HOLOTHURIAN (ECHINODERMATA) ASSOCIATIONS IN THE AZORES PETER WIRTZ WIRTZ, PETER 1998. Caprellid (Crustacea) - holothurian (Echinodermata) associations in the Azores. Arquipdago. Life and Marine Sciences 16A: 53-55. Ponta Delgada. ISSN 0873-4704. Caprellid - holothurian associations are described from the Azores, north-eastern Atlantic. Caprella stella and Phtisica marina, previously encountered with starfish at the island of Faial, Azores, were recorded in large groups (more than 20 animals) on Holothuria tubulosa at Monte da Guia, Faial Island, Azores. This is the first description of an association between caprellids and a holothurian WIRTZ, PETER 1998. Associac$es entre caprelideos e holot6rias nos Agores. Arquipdago. Cithcias Biol6gicas e Marinhas 16A: 53-55. Ponta Delgada. ISSN 0873-4704. Descreve se para as Bguas agoreanas associagbes entre os caprelideos Caprella stella e Phtisica marina 0'8 encontrados em associagiio corn estrelas-do-mar nos Agores) e o pepino-do-mar Holothuria tubulosa. 0s caprelideos foram encontrados em grandes grupos (mais que 20 individuos) na superficie do pepino-do-mar. Isto 6 o primeiro registo de uma associa~Ioentre caprelideos e um pepino-do-mar. Peter Wirtz, Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos &ores, Cais de S. Cruz, PT - 9900 Horta, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION on sea urchins and on a brittle star (references in WIRTZ & VADER 1996; VOLBEHR & RACHOR 1997). Apparently, no associations involving Most species of caprellid amphipods live among holothurians have as yet been reported. algae, hydroids, sponges or bryozoans, but a considerable number has also been found to live in more specific associations with invertebrates MATERIAL AND METHODS such as gorgonians (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Amphipoda: Caprellidea)
    VIERAEA Vol. 31 157-166 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, diciembre 2003 ISSN 0210-945X Estudio de los caprélidos de Lanzarote, islas Canarias (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Caprellidea) RODRIGO RIERA1, JOSÉ MANUEL GUERRA-GARCÍA2, MARÍA DEL CARMEN BRITO1 & JORGE N ÚÑEZ1 1) Laboratorio de Bentos, Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de La Laguna, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Islas Canarias 2) Laboratorio de Biología Marina, Departamento de Fisiología y Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Reina Mercedes 6, 41012 Sevilla RIERA, R., J.M. GUERRA-GARCÍA, M.C. BRITO & J. NÚÑEZ (2003). Study of the caprellids from Lanzarote, Canary Islands (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Caprellidea). VIERAEA 31: 157-166. ABSTRACT: This is the first contribution to the study of the caprellid fauna from Lanzarote. The species Caprella acanthifera Leach, C. cavediniae Krapp-Schickel and Vader, C. danilevskii Czerniavski, C. equilibra Say, C. penantis (Leach), Phtisica marina (Slabber), Pariambus typicus (Kröyer) and Pseudoprotella phasma (Montagu) were taken from intertidal substrates and soft bottoms at a depth of 10-13 m. The species C. cavediniae is first recorded from the Atlantic Ocean. Autoecological data of each species and a key to the Caprellidea reported so far from the Canary Islands are also presented. Key words: Atlantic-mediterranean region, Canary Islands, Lanzarote, soft- bottoms, intertidal, Amphipods, Caprellids. RESUMEN: Este trabajo constituye el primer estudio de los caprélidos para la isla de Lanzarote. Las especies encontradas fueron Caprella acanthifera Leach, C. cavediniae Krapp-Schickel y Vader, C. danilevskii Czerniavski, C. equilibra Say, C. penantis (Leach), Phtisica marina (Slabber), Pariambus typicus (Kröyer) y Pseudoprotella phasma (Montagu), recolectadas en ambientes intermareales y en fondos arenosos submareales entre 10-13 m de profundidad.
    [Show full text]
  • CUED Phd and Mphil Thesis Classes
    The phylogenetic structure of ecological communities under change William D. Pearse Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 30th of November, 2012 1 Acknowledgements All of the people below have made the last three-and-a-bit years some of the best of my life so far. You are all fantastic people, thank you. Andy, I can't imagine a better supervisor than you. You've always done what was best for me, and I can never thank you enough for the support you gave with my wrists. You make every conversation enjoyable, whether it's about chapter two or Stewart Lee. David, I'll always be grateful for your patience, particularly with my ignorance of butterflies! Mick, thank you for all your advice, particularly for encouraging me to \inject an element of theatre" into practicals. Golf-India-Oscar, thank you for keeping me sane and happy. I've spent almost every day of the last four years within about five meters of you, and I wouldn't change a thing about that. My emotional supervisor, Lynsey|things are always more fun when you're around. You more than anyone taught me how to actually survive a PhD, and I can't think of a single conversation with you or Nils that hasn't made my day brighter. Purvis ladieeees. Isabel, you constantly say \which should be fun", which sums up every morning coffee with you perfectly. Adriana, you're a cheeky chappy, and I very much enjoy your cockney palavas.
    [Show full text]