Posted on Authorea 11 Sep 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159986361.19521816 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. hc h ie ouainrpr a eesd ecniee h uigpry hs he iitri in in is year, Minister respective Chief the whose of party, states ruling the 20 considered in We party released. political was ruling report the “Sustained population and and article. stated, tiger this numbers”, population (2019) with the tiger tiger which dynamics al. in on population et increase data tiger Jhala an compiled ruling and We addition, in the parties tiger of In resulted ruling estimated terms have assess in India. and will” to vary party in numbers attempted “political tiger we states political continued how occupying ruling through and if tigers between efforts determine conservation the relationship to in the seek society. we party assess particular, and political to In science is India. politics, article in the this population of approach of integrated purpose through The 2603 made around be ranging tiger can numbers world’s decisions recent accountable of revealed that exercise 80% wildlife estimation over ( camera-trap tiger has 3346 India largest India to all world’s years, systematic the the 2006, being over since accumulated for 110% knowledge Records World recent ( the of population on Book based Guinness and the survey earned has 2018 in parts most in complex politically ( inherently ( and level ( concern international environmental world global the decisions. a of political timely is and conservation sensible Wildlife indicates and whole tiger a as ( as (such India species ecosystems, flagship in threatened phenomenon globally rare a ( of a number parties in political ( increase amongst influence human wildlife, “non-political” direct with of as a interactions been have their generally activities and has anthropogenic wildlife wildlife and of decisions survival political the world, on globalised geopolitically the In 2 0000-0002-6338-4254). * (ORCID: India Pradesh, Uttar Banda-210001, 1 Maheshwari Aishwarya Politics? like Tigers Do 2020 11, September 2 1 Maheshwari Aishwarya Politics? like Tigers Do idiet uaiyi em ftecuilcnrbto tmkst h utrl cnmc prta and spiritual economic, cultural, the to makes it ( contribution worldwide crucial communities the of of well-being terms social in humanity to ( wildlife species wild to protection different with ,8 3, needn oiia nls,India. Analyst, Technology, Political and Independent Agriculture of [email protected] University author: Banda Corresponding Forestry, of College Sciences, Wildlife of Department ffiito o available Technology not and Affiliation Agriculture of University Banda .Tepehsoi id yhlgclblesaeeietwt soito fteGd n Goddesses and Gods the of association with evident are beliefs mythological Hindu pre-historic The ). 4 .Tekoldeta uhntowd xrie cur smd vial oplc aesso makers policy to available made is acquire exercises nationwide such that knowledge The ). ,10 4, vahanas ,6 5, .Tgrpplto nIdahsrmral nrae vrtepeiu eae ihover with decade, previous the over increased remarkably has India in population Tiger ). ,7 2, .Pltclprisaetekyatr hpn idieplce oha ainland national at both policies wildlife shaping actors key the are parties Political ). 1* aia eils natqiyadeissc sRmyn n aahrt gave Mahabharata and Ramayana as such epics and antiquity in vehicles) (animal .A eainbtenwllf n oiishsfrln enacoeoei India in one close a been long for has politics and wildlife between relation As ). n aevMaheshwari Rajeev and 1 8 n aevMaheshwari Rajeev and 4 .I eetdcds ol a oet eonz h eta motneof importance central the recognize to come has world decades, recent In ). .Mroe,sc eoeyo ag rdtretiswt elhe natural healthier with entails predator large a of recovery such Moreover, ). 9 .Freape eetrcgiino ni’ ie census tiger India’s of recognition recent example, For ). 2 1 2 ,2 1, .I uhseai,cniuu eln in decline continuous scenario, such In ). ,3 2, .I h iatosdeterioration disastrous the In ). ateatigris Panthera appears ) Posted on Authorea 11 Sep 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159986361.19521816 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. npltcldsore oee,Idahsahee t agto obigtetgrcutfu er ha of ahead years four count tiger the involved doubling getting References of Unlike with target difficulties India. ruling its has in achieved and wildlife states has numbers ( and harbouring India 2022 India tiger tiger However, in 20 both discourse. lacking to together political are applied in parties we bringing green that on approach system, literature new Perhaps political Western a nascent presenting instance. the by any to parties in political contributes periodically identity study in approach party brief not apolitical This each did states of study 20 foundation the this ideological of population. the as any tiger to in in apolitical, suggest monitoring pertains avoid population results be implication might tiger to Our important to and exercise difficult most party dimension. appears is our estimation political policy Tiger problem ruling broad tiger major This a India. the between on party. in relationship whereas focusing another no be released, is previous would there were of agenda that party numbers regime political political specific political tiger ruling party the the the assessing 1). under of 8.5 which (Table the taken selection with in tigers by as been victory 603.5 year followed such have huge with short-comings same closely with states possible over the three tigers), has taken in for approach (1175 Once BJP trailed our states the INC that tigers). 2018, acknowledge the occupied We in states 141 and tiger contrast, the tigers) with ruling 6.5 In (1688.5 doubling states BJP states with tigers). almost (2 prominent tiger occupied leading (500.5 five (CPI) two tiger with was states with India (adding states ruling INC leading of five states 4.5 the was Party BJP’s ruling ruling 2014, INC Communist INC BJP the in the the 2010 the and again, with in by Karnataka) Similarly, comparison followed and in Uttarakhand closely tigers). (815) 33 tigers, with numbers and 424 states tiger states (four with occupied (BJP) (1.5 Party tiger states CPI Janta 6.5 it Bharatiya with occupied the leading the (as was and by followed (INC) rule tigers) Congress 630) ruling President’s National 356 population the Indian tiger the the of total except parties, change (comprising political year any states ruling or 20 particular of elections that 2006, are In in party). there political parties If 1706, any the 1411, respectively. to There populations 2018 both belong tiger year. and doesn’t credited estimated particular 2014 2006, we that 2010, since government, same for 2006, project the party estimation considered in in tiger were 2967 place India taken parties and all were two 2226 of elections released, cycles if was Furthermore, four been repot formed. have is population government tiger coalition when a year of case in office, the C .Smn .S te,N .Lvih 08 tt n oa oenetadpltc:Popcsfor Prospects politics: and government local and of State economy 2018. political Lovrich. The P. N. dynamics: Steel, system S. and B. power, Simon, Science, A. 2001. C. 7. M’Gonigle. M. science. India R. conservation and in Song, society prey J. challenge Limits S. and 2016. co-predators 6. Simberloff. tigers, S. of D. Maris, Status V. Martin, 2019. Jean-Louis (eds). 5. in Nayak management K. resource A. and Qureshi, conservation Conservation Q. Wildlife Jhala, 2019. politics: V. as Y. Macdonald. Conservation W. 4. D. 2000. Macdonald, Saberwal. A. K. E. V. Dickman, 3. A. Burnham, Characterization D. 1995. Hodgetts, authors). T. (lead 2. Redford K. Padoch, C. Leveque, C. Gadgil, M. McNeely, J.A. 1. P.Cadne,BdsCes .Fshr .Grod .Jr,F aaqe 02 h au fwildlife. of value The 2002. Lamarque. F. Jori, F. Gerhold, New R. Foundation, Fischer, Ranthambore J. Clers, and B.des Black Chardonnet, Permanent Ph. history. 9. wildlife India’s 2001. Rangarajan. M. 8. utiaiiy 2 sustainability, 15:980–989 Biology, doi:10.1073/pnas.1525003113 Conservation 6105-6112, biology. conservation 113: Sciences, of Academy National & the Delhi of New Proceedings India, No./2019/05. of TR Government Dehradun. Authority, India, Conservation of Tiger Institute National Wildlife 10.1080/13880290009353954 Report. doi: Summary 3:166-173. 2018. Policy, & Law Wildlife International of Journal India, doi:10.1111/cobi.13238 33:250-259. Biology Conservation assessment. Geopolitics. biodiversity Global 715–821. (eds.). Pp. I. Baste, Cambridge. and R.T., Press. Watson, University V.H., Cambridge Heywood, In: biodiversity. of cetfi n ehia eiwo h ffieItrainldsEiote,21:15-51. Epizooties, des International Office the of Review Technical and Scientific Delhi. 4 hc eet aorbecnevto oiyad“oiia il o iesi India. in tigers for will” “political and policy conservation favourable reflects which ) nd dto,Oeo tt nvriyCorvallis. University State Oregon edition, 2 Posted on Authorea 11 Sep 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159986361.19521816 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. al .Tgrhrorn ttsadternmesdrn orpae fAlIdaTgrMntrn exercise. Monitoring Tiger India All of phases four during numbers their and states harbouring Tiger 1. Table eaaIC-CmuitPryo ni 6CmuitPryo ni Mrit 1IC-136 - INC 71 - (Marxist) India of Party Communist 70 - (Marxist) CPI 10 - BJP - Rule President - JMM formed not numbers was tiger State the with parties 10 109 - Front political - People’s (JDU) 6 ruling (SP) Nagaland (United) - and Party Front Dal released National Samajwadi Janata were Mizo numbers 46 tiger - India which 290 of in - Party Years (Secular) Communist Telangana Dal - Janta INC - numbers Pradesh 70 INC tiger Uttar - the INC INC with parties Nagaland political ruling and Mizoram released were numbers Bihar tiger which 10 in - Karnataka Years 103 Marxist) - (CPI INC India numbers Kerala of Party tiger Communist the (JMM) Morcha with Assam Mukti 178 95 parties Jharkhand - - political then INC INC 32 ruling 2006 Goa - -163 and Sept. INC DMK released till then were BJP 2008 Maharashtra numbers March till tiger Pradesh BJP which Andhra in Years Uttarakhand 45 numbers - tiger (BJD) -76 the Bengal Dal (DMK) with Janata Kazhagam parties Biju Munnetra political Dravida Jharkhand 14 ruling 26 - 300 - - (AIADMK) and - BJP BJP Kazhagam released BJP Rajasthan Munnetra were Dravida numbers Anna Pradesh tiger India Arunachal which All in Years Pradesh Madhya Chhattisgarh Odisha Nadu Tamil State Mlwr.22.Ida ie td an t tie soeo h ol’ ags wildlife largest world’s the of one as stripes its earns study tiger Indian 2020. Millward. 10. one-of-the-world’s-largest-wildlife-surve-624966 https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2020/7/indian-tiger-study-earns-its-stripes-as- surveys. 2006 3 2010 tt a o formed not 118 was - State (BSP) Party Samaj Bahujan Front People’s Nagaland 5 - INC 8 - JDU 300 - BJP 143 - INC INC 168 - INC 72 - INC 227 - BJP 36 - INC INC 257 - BJP 26 - BJP 32 - BJD l ni rnmo oges(IM-7 IM-88 - AITM (TRS) Samithi Rashtra Telangana 117 - SP Front People’s Nagaland 3 - INC 28 - JDU 406 - INC 167 - INC 190 - 5 BJP - - BJP Rule President - 68 INC - (TDP) Party Desam Telugu 340 79 - (AITM)- INC Congress Trinamool India 3 All - BJP - JMM 45 - BJP 28 - INC 308 - BJP 46 - BJP 28 - BJD 229 - AIADMK 2014 eagn ahr aih TS 26 - (TRS) Samithi 0 Rashtra - Telangana Party Progressive 173 - Democratic BJP Nationalist - 0 Front - People’s Front Nagaland National Mizo - INC 31 - 524 JDU - 190 BJP - - (Marxist) INC India of Party Communist 190 - BJP 3 - BJP 312 - BJP 48 - TDP 442 - BJP 5 - BJP 69 - INC 29 - 526 19 BJP - - INC INC - then BJP 2018 Dec. till BJP 28 - BJD 264 - AIADMK 2018