The Great and the Small

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Great and the Small PREFACE The Great and the Small “How very beautiful these gems are!” said Dorothea, under a new current of feeling, as sudden as the gleam. “It is strange how deeply colours seem to penetrate one, like scent. I suppose this is the reason why gems are used as spiritual emblems in the Revelation of St John. They look like fragments of heaven.” George Eliot, Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life I remember� the first time I encountered Joseph Cornell. It was 2004, a few months into my sophomore year of college, and the Museum of Modern Art had just reopened in a gleaming building on Fifty- Third Street. Ascending the ziggurat of escalators to the fifth floor, I wandered past paintings by Cézanne, Picasso, and Matisse before arriving at the gallery dedicated to Surrealism. Cornell’s Taglioni’s Jewel Casket from 1940 was installed in the corner of a large plexiglass vitrine (figs. P.1, P.2). Just twelve inches wide, this modest box holds a world. Glass cubes shine like diamonds, like the paste necklace draped across the box’s lid, whose rhinestones form an arc of sparkle below a block of blue text. This text tells the tale of the famed nineteenth-century ballet dancer Marie Taglioni (fig. P.3). While traveling on a Russian highway one snowy night in 1835, Taglioni’s carriage was stopped by a bandit. Unfurling a panther’s skin on the icy ground, she proceeded to dance so beautifully that the robber allowed her to leave unmolested, her jewels still in her possession. The story concludes: “From this actuality arose the legend that to keep alive the memory of this adventure so precious to her, TAGLIONI formed the habit of placing a piece of artificial ice in her jewel casket or dressing table where, melting among the sparkling stones, there was evoked a hint of the atmosphere of the starlit heavens over the ice- covered landscape.” At this moment, Cornell’s work seemed to capture everything I loved about art: its ability to call forth places and times other than my own, its unabashed investment in the magic of the aesthetic encounter. Unlike the painters and sculptors who preceded him in MoMA’s galleries, Cornell eschewed the hallowed mediums of paint, marble, and bronze in favor of altogether more modest materials. Before my eyes, chunks of glass were transformed into gleaming repositories of history and memory, precious as the diamonds they mimic. IX 01 KWONtext_FINAL_SRS.indd 9 11/11/20 11:31 AM Yet I could not help but notice that Cornell’s work seemed at odds with its companions in the Surrealism gallery, to say nothing of the preceding parade of ambitious paintings and sculptures. The brutality of André Masson’s bloody fishes, battling amongst haphazard passages of sand and gesso; the startling juxtaposition of taxidermy parrot and mannequin leg in Joan Miró’s Object (1936): these works seemed more concerned with shattering illusions than creating them.1 I was not the first to observe Cornell’s incongruity with canonical narratives of Modern art. Deborah Solomon’s popular biography presents Cornell as a hermitic figure who, despite his engagement with New York City culture, remained ensconced in his mother’s basement, lost in dreams.2 When I returned to the artist years later, I found scholars had done much to complicate this stubborn caricature. Their books have detailed Cornell’s engagement with subjects such as astronomy, cinema, childhood, travel, and Surrealism to establish his place in modernity.3 While sympathetic to the aims of these interpreters, I could not help but notice that these accounts remained structured by the dualistic oppositions— between belief and disbelief, ideal and real— that Cornell seemed determined to overcome. Taglioni’s Jewel Casket is after all an expression of the artist’s belief in the incantatory power of the aesthetic FIG. P.2 Installation view of the exhibition Painting and Sculpture: Inaugural Installation, November 20, 2004–December 31, 2005, with Joseph Cornell’s Taglioni’s Jewel Casket at bottom left. Museum of Modern Art, New York. FIG. P.3 Detail of Taglioni’s Jewel Casket. X Preface 01 KWONtext_FINAL_SRS.indd 10 11/11/20 11:31 AM encounter. Cornell was also a lifelong practitioner of Christian Science, a religion devoted to mending what its followers perceive as the false divide between the material and the divine. Why, I wondered, was the price of Cornell’s modernity the abnegation of his most deeply held principles? How did belief become antithetical to intelligence and seriousness? To answer these questions, this book examines Cornell’s work alongside narratives of enchantment in twentieth-century American art. My title is drawn from Max Weber’s infamous description of modernity as the “disenchantment of the world” in his 1918 speech “Science as Vocation.”4 Weber defines disenchantment as modernity’s loss of a higher unifying power, religious or otherwise. An impoverished rationalism arose in its place, wrenching the world into distinct spheres governed by their own internal logic rather than divine law. Weber’s disenchantment thesis describes this loss of faith as the defining condition of modernity. As a believer, both in Christian Science and in nineteenth- century artistic movements that struggled against the world’s perceived disenchantment, Cornell’s work offers a vantage onto the fraught history of enchantment in twentieth- century America.5 Weber’s understanding of modernity as the negation of enchantment has had significant consequences for the way art historians understand the history and ethical stakes of twentieth- century art, for the structural paradox I discerned within the literature on Cornell also describes the epistemic grounding of many art historical accounts of Modernism. Writing in Farewell to an Idea, T. J. Clark states that Weber’s disenchantment thesis “still seems to me to sum up this side of modernity best.”6 Rosalind Krauss likewise relies on this model when describing the options open to twentieth- century artists: “Given the absolute rift that had opened between the sacred and the secular,” she asserts, “the modern artist was obviously faced with the necessity to choose between one mode of expression and the other.” Now, Krauss continues, “We find it indescribably embarrassing to mentionart and spirit in the same sentence.”7 Although distinct in aim and approach, Clark and Krauss’s foundational texts share a confidence in disenchantment as a synonym for modernity. In their telling, Modernism was either a doomed struggle against the pernicious contingencies imposed by capitalism, or it gave rise to an avant- garde that sought to demystify modernity’s most unbearable fictions: the subject, the commodity, the sign, and the very idea of “art” itself. Within such narratives, Cornell’s enchantment can only be understood as escapist and antimodern. Despite the best efforts of Cornell scholars, this view of the artist remains stubborn, as evidenced by a 2015 review of the sensitive exhibition Joseph Cornell: Wanderlust, titled “Joseph Cornell: How the Reclusive Artist Conquered the Art World— from His Mum’s Basement.”8 Cornell’s distress at this pervasive misprision was such that he ended a close friendship with Robert Motherwell over the painter’s description of him as “withdrawn.”9 And in the late 1960s, Cornell noted acidly, “The preoccupation with my seclusion in the mass media and critiques is based on misconceptions, repeated parrot- like by those who should know better— until it has acquired the semblance of fact.”10 This dogged misconception, and its continued purchase into the present moment, suggests that a new approach is needed. What is required is an investigation of the epistemological structures undergirding the very concept of modernity, and the facile dismissal of belief as a mere evasion of the real. The Great and the Small XI 01 KWONtext_FINAL_SRS.indd 11 11/11/20 11:31 AM This book explores the stories that people tell themselves to explain the workings of the world and the consequences of these beliefs. What is suppressed by taking Weber’s disenchantment thesis as the definition of modernity? What ways of being are thereby invalidated as antimodern, narcissistic, escapist, or even primitive, when belief in the enchanted dimensions of life are seen as little more than “embarrassing” artifacts of a distant past? Scholars have discussed this issue from a variety of disciplinary perspectives. Political theorist Jane Bennett argues that the disenchantment thesis “ignores and then discourages affective attachment” to the world.11 Stanley Cavell describes the philosophical lens of skepticism, or “the Kantian insight that Reason dictates what we mean by a world,” as a turn against “intimacy with existence” toward “skepticism’s despair of the world.”12 Cornell sought this intimacy, this attachment to the world, however imperfect it may be. Glimpsing a worn suitcase bathed in sunlight, he wrote, “The thought became clear of taking something, something beautiful from a tragic or frustrated life and doing something with it— a system that can be applied to all my work.”13 In her oft- cited essay on paranoid and reparative reading, Eve Sedgwick gets closest to what I understand as the larger stakes of this book. Given the still- prevalent academic impulse to demystify ideological illusions, what do we make of the writers and artists, Cornell included, who attempt to find resources and richness in a fallen world rather than subject it to critique? “What we can best learn from such practices are,” Sedgwick writes, “the many ways selves and communities succeed in extracting sustenance from the objects of a culture— even of a culture whose avowed desire has often been not to sustain them.”14 To invoke Robert Rauschenberg’s still- potent truism about his desire to exist in the gap between art and life, Cornell asks us to reconsider what we mean by “life.” Cornell’s persistent patina of otherness— his perceived lack of fit with canonical art historical � narratives— offers an opportunity to consider these questions.
Recommended publications
  • With Dada and Pop Art Influence
    With Dada and Pop Art Influence The non-art movement • 1916-1923 • Reaction to the horror of World War I • Artists were mostly French and German. They took refuge in neutral Switzerland. • They were angry at the European society that had allowed the war to happen. • Dada was a form of protest. • It’s intention was to provoke and shock The name “Dada” was chosen because it was nonsensical. They wanted a name that made the least amount of sense. • They used any public forum to spit on: nationalism rationalism materialism and society in general Mona Lisa with a Mustache “The Fountain” “The Bride Stripped Bare by her Bachelors, Even” George Groz “Remember Uncle Augustus the Unhappy Inventor”(collage) Raoul Hausmann “ABCD” (collage) Merit Oppenheim “Luncheon in Fur” Using pre-existing objects or images with little or no transformation applied to them Artist use borrowed elements in their creation of a new work • Dada self-destructed when it was in danger of becoming “acceptable.” • The Dada movement and the Surrealists have influenced many important artists. Joseph Cornell (1903-1972) became one of the most famous artists to use assemblage. His work is both surreal and poetic. A 3-D form of using "found" objects arranged in such a way that they create a piece of art. The Pop American artist, Robert Rauschenberg, uses assemblage, painting, printmaking and collage in his work. He is directly influenced by the Dada-ists. “Canyon” “Monogram” “Bed” “Coca-cola Plan” “Retroactive” • These artist use borrowed elements in their creation to make a new work of art! • As long as those portions of copyrighted works are used to create a completely new and different work of art it was OK.
    [Show full text]
  • HARD FACTS and SOFT SPECULATION Thierry De Duve
    THE STORY OF FOUNTAIN: HARD FACTS AND SOFT SPECULATION Thierry de Duve ABSTRACT Thierry de Duve’s essay is anchored to the one and perhaps only hard fact that we possess regarding the story of Fountain: its photo in The Blind Man No. 2, triply captioned “Fountain by R. Mutt,” “Photograph by Alfred Stieglitz,” and “THE EXHIBIT REFUSED BY THE INDEPENDENTS,” and the editorial on the facing page, titled “The Richard Mutt Case.” He examines what kind of agency is involved in that triple “by,” and revisits Duchamp’s intentions and motivations when he created the fictitious R. Mutt, manipulated Stieglitz, and set a trap to the Independents. De Duve concludes with an invitation to art historians to abandon the “by” questions (attribution, etc.) and to focus on the “from” questions that arise when Fountain is not seen as a work of art so much as the bearer of the news that the art world has radically changed. KEYWORDS, Readymade, Fountain, Independents, Stieglitz, Sanitary pottery Then the smell of wet glue! Mentally I was not spelling art with a capital A. — Beatrice Wood1 No doubt, Marcel Duchamp’s best known and most controversial readymade is a men’s urinal tipped on its side, signed R. Mutt, dated 1917, and titled Fountain. The 2017 centennial of Fountain brought us a harvest of new books and articles on the famous or infamous urinal. I read most of them in the hope of gleaning enough newly verified facts to curtail my natural tendency to speculate. But newly verified facts are few and far between.
    [Show full text]
  • Artist Resources – Joseph Cornell (American, 1903-72)
    Artist Resources – Joseph Cornell (American, 1903-72) The Joseph and Robert Cornell Memorial Foundation Joseph Cornell Study Center, Smithsonian American Art Museum “Everything meant something to him, and everything was about his work, and everything was special. I mean, he was someone who used things in his work that were sometimes esoteric and sometimes ordinary, but in either case once his glance hit it, it was special,” reflected Harry Roseman, Cornell’s studio assistant in a 1999 interview about his first meeting and studio memories with Cornell. “One thing about being there and knowing him and being with him is this: in how we respond to things we have a choice as to whether to keep our self- conscious coolness and our analytical ability or to go with something. To suspend disbelief. It's a kind of faith, in a sense.” 177 of Cornell’s creations were on view in the Smithsonian American Art Museum’s 2007 retrospective. In 2014, Christie’s auctioned a stellar collection of Cornell box constructions owned by prominent Chicago art collectors Ed and Lindy Cornell, ca. 1940 Bergman. The auction house details the pieces in-depth in a video interview with scholars. London’s Royal Academy celebrated Cornell’s fanciful constructions in the 2015 exhibition, Wanderlust. Over 80 boxes, assemblages, and collages were brought together with the artist’s films to explore his love of nature and dreams of travel. Digital resources include a series of podcasts in which scholars discuss Cornell’s creative identity and his relationship to Surrealism; and a photo tour of Cornell’s studio with curator Sarah Lea.
    [Show full text]
  • Film, Folders, and Mina Loy
    FORUM: IN THE ARCHIVES Live from the Archive: Film, Folders, and Mina Loy Sasha Colby In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, much of the talk around ideas of re-animation centred on the great archaeological expeditions where place names stood for sites of unimaginable recovery: Egypt, Mesopotamia, Greece, Pompeii. A body of literature arose around this reclamation, often imaginatively reconstituting the historical from its material remains. The unprecedented unearthing of the past also led to questions: how could material relics at once be past yet at the same time exist in the present; give rise to fantasies of reconnection; disorient the line between then and now? Writers from Pater to Nietzsche were preoccupied by these questions and also by the perceived dangers of being consumed by history—as well as the delusion of being able to reclaim it. Intriguingly, in our own moment, new versions of these debates have been taken up by Performance Studies scholars, on many counts an unlikely group of inheritors. Yet questions about the power of the object in the archive, its ability to summon the past, its place in the present, its relation to performance modalities, and the archiving of performance itself, in many ways bear the traces of these earlier discussions. Indeed, Mike Pearson and Michael Shanks’ Theatre/Archaeology (2001) situates itself at this border precisely in order to unpack the conceptual similarities of theatrical and archaeological projects, all of which gesture, as Rebecca Schneider (2011) has shown, to reenactment as a kind of end-point for rediscovery. When I put away my first book, Stratified Modernism (2009), about the relationship between archaeology and modernist writing, in order to start the second, Staging Modernist Lives, I thought—as we so often do—that I was putting one thing aside in order to start something entirely new: in this case, a treatise on the usefulness of biographical performance for modernist scholarship that includes three of my own plays about writers H.
    [Show full text]
  • California Modernism After World War Ii
    1 CALIFORNIA MODERNISM AFTER WORLD WAR II So in America when the sun goes down and I sit on the old broken-down river pier watching the long, long skies over New Jersey and sense all that raw land that rolls in one unbelievable huge bulge over to the West Coast, and all that road going, and all the people dreaming in the immensity of it, and in Iowa I know by now the children must be crying in the land where they let the children cry, and tonight the stars’ll be out, and don’t you know that God is Pooh Bear? The evening star must be drooping and shedding her sparkler dims on the prairie, which is just before the coming of complete night that blesses the earth, darkens all the rivers, cups the peaks and folds the final shore in, and nobody, nobody knows what’s going to happen to anybody besides the forlorn rags of growing old, I think of Dean Moriarty, I even think of Old Dean Moriarty the father we never found, I think of Dean Moriarty. JACK KEROUAC, ON THE ROAD POSTWAR EXCHANGES Most historical accounts of cultural and artistic developments in the United States after World War II have offered little information about trends affecting artists across the country. In the rush to figure out who did what first and to locate it geographically—usu - ally in New York— the historians have ignored the fluid interchanges between the two coasts, and cultural opportunities offered on either of them in these postwar years.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Cornell: Films
    Joseph Cornell: Films Joseph Cornell: Rose Hobart What Cornell’s movies are is the essence of a home movie. They deal with things very close to us, every day and everywhere. Small things, not the big things. Not wars, not stormy emotions, dramatic clashes or situations. His images are much simpler. […] The boxes, the collages, the home movies of Joseph Cornell are the invisible cathedrals of our age. That is, they are almost invisible, as are all the best things that man can still find today: They are almost invisible unless you look for them. — Jonas Mekas, “The Invisible Cathedrals of Joseph Cornell,” The Village Voice, December 31, 1970. Reprinted in Jonas Mekas: Movie Journal. Joseph Cornell was an artist fascinated by the innocent yet profound spectacle of The Movies: by the pleasures and mysteries afforded by the trick- film, by the exotic travelogue and by the untouchable beauty of the Hollywood starlet. While this deep appreciation of cinema is reflected in his collages and otherworldly box constructions, Cornell’s own work with film—largely unscreened during his lifetime—remains underappreciated to this day. Yet, with his childlike wonder, nostalgic appreciation for found footage, and sophisticated sense of montage, Joseph Cornell’s film work has proven highly influential on later generations of filmmakers. On the occasion of Joseph Cornell: Navigating the Imagination, San Francisco Cinematheque and The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art present Joseph Cornell: Films, a rare opportunity to see the film work of this master collagist
    [Show full text]
  • KATHARINE CONLEY August 2020
    KATHARINE CONLEY August 2020 Modern Languages & Literatures 21 Sussex Court William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23188 PO Box 8795 (757) 645-3876 Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795 (603) 443-2462 (cell) [email protected] ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS Professor of French and Francophone Studies, William and Mary, 7/12- Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, William and Mary 7/12-6/20 Edward Tuck Professor of French and Comparative Literature, Dartmouth, 7/10-6/12 Professor of French, Dartmouth College, 7/04-6/12, Emerita 7/12- Associate Professor of French, Dartmouth College, 7/98 - 6/04 Assistant Professor of French, Dartmouth College, 7/92 - 6/98 EDUCATION Virginia Women’s Senior Leadership Seminar 2015-16 Harvard Institute for Management and Leadership in Education, June 2014 PhD French, University of Pennsylvania, May 1992 Honorary MA, Dartmouth College, 2007 MA French, University of Pennsylvania, 1990; MA French, University of Colorado, 1988 BA cum laude, Harvard-Radcliffe University, 1979 (major: honors English) AWARDS, FELLOWSHIPS, AND INSTITUTES (since 1992) Phi Beta Kappa, Dartmouth College, June 2009 Jacobus Family Fellowship, Dartmouth College, 2004-2005 Senior Faculty Fellowship, Dartmouth College, Winter-Spring 2005 J. Kenneth Huntington Memorial Award, Dartmouth College, June 2004 Whiting Foundation Travel Grant: Summer 1996 Humanities Institute on Cultural Memory and the Present, Spring 1996 Junior Faculty Fellowship, Dartmouth College, Winter-Spring 1996 School of Criticism and Theory, June-July 1995 Burke Research Initiation Grant, Dartmouth College: 1992-1995 PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS Books and Edited Volumes: Author: Surrealist Ghostliness. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2013. Katharine Conley / 2 Author: Robert Desnos, Surrealism, and the Marvelous in Everyday Life.
    [Show full text]
  • How Women Wrote Modernism, 1900 to 1940 Course Number Spanish M98T Multiple Listed with Gender Studies M98T
    Spanish/Gender Studies M98T General Education Course Information Sheet Please submit this sheet for each proposed course SPA/M 98T (Please cross list Spanish and Portuguese & Department & Course Number Women’s Studies, * Comp Lit as well if possible*) “Her Side of the Story: How Women ‘Wrote’ Course Title Modernism(1900-1940) 1 Check the recommended GE foundation area(s) and subgroups(s) for this course Foundations of the Arts and Humanities Literary and Cultural Analysis X Philosophic and Linguistic Analysis Visual and Performance Arts Analysis and Practice Foundations of Society and Culture Historical Analysis Social Analysis Foundations of Scientific Inquiry Physical Science With Laboratory or Demonstration Component must be 5 units (or more) Life Science With Laboratory or Demonstration Component must be 5 units (or more) 2. Briefly describe the rationale for assignment to foundation area(s) and subgroup(s) chosen. This course will help students: Understand the socio-historic conditions that led to the development of Modernist movements. Study canonical Modernist texts. Learn to distinguish fundamental aesthetic characteristics of early twentieth century Modernisms through the study of prose, poetry and visual arts. (using primary and secondary sources). Explore the close relationship between Modernist movements and women’s changing social roles in the early twentieth century. Illustrate women’s importance as agents of transnational and transatlantic Modernist movements. Critically engage texts and develop research and writing skills. 3. List faculty member(s) and teaching fellow who will serve as instructor (give academic rank): Professor Roberta Johnson Visiting Professor, UCLA Department of Spanish and Portuguese/ Professor Emerita, University of Kansas 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Art 150: Introduction to the Visual Arts David Mccarthy Rhodes College, Spring 2003 414 Clough, Ext
    Art 150: Introduction to the Visual Arts David McCarthy Rhodes College, Spring 2003 414 Clough, Ext. 3663 417 Clough, MWF 11:30-12:30 Office Hours: MWF 2:00- 4:00, and by appointment. COURSE OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION The objectives of the course are as follows: (1) to provide students with a comprehensive, theoretical introduction to the visual arts; (2) to develop skills of visual analysis; (3) to examine various media used by artists; (4) to introduce students to methods of interpretation; and (5) to develop skills in writing about art. Throughout the course we will keep in mind the following two statements: Pierre Auguste Renoir’s reminder that, “to practice an art, you must begin with the ABCs of that art;” and E.H. Gombrich’s insight that, “the form of representation cannot be divorced from its purpose and the requirements of the society in which the given language gains currency.” Among the themes and issues we will examine are the following: balance, shape and form, space, color, conventions, signs and symbols, representation, reception, and interpretation. To do this we will look at many different types of art produced in several historical epochs and conceived in a variety of media. Whenever possible we will examine original art objects. Art 150 is a foundation course that serves as an introduction for further work in studio art and art history. A three-hour course, Art 150 satisfies the fine arts requirement. Enrollment is limited to first- and second-year students who are not expected to have had any previous experience with either studio or art history.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fillia's Futurism Writing
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fillia’s Futurism Writing, Politics, Gender and Art after the First World War A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Italian By Adriana Marie Baranello 2014 © Copyright by Adriana Marie Baranello 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Fillia’s Futurism Writing, Politics, Gender and Art after the First World War By Adriana Marie Baranello Doctor of Philosophy in Italian University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Lucia Re, Co-Chair Professor Claudio Fogu, Co-Chair Fillia (Luigi Colombo, 1904-1936) is one of the most significant and intriguing protagonists of the Italian futurist avant-garde in the period between the two World Wars, though his body of work has yet to be considered in any depth. My dissertation uses a variety of critical methods (socio-political, historical, philological, narratological and feminist), along with the stylistic analysis and close reading of individual works, to study and assess the importance of Fillia’s literature, theater, art, political activism, and beyond. Far from being derivative and reactionary in form and content, as interwar futurism has often been characterized, Fillia’s works deploy subtler, but no less innovative forms of experimentation. For most of his brief but highly productive life, Fillia lived and worked in Turin, where in the early 1920s he came into contact with Antonio Gramsci and his factory councils. This led to a period of extreme left-wing communist-futurism. In the mid-1920s, following Marinetti’s lead, Fillia moved toward accommodation with the fascist regime. This shift to the right eventually even led to a phase ii dominated by Catholic mysticism, from which emerged his idiosyncratic and highly original futurist sacred art.
    [Show full text]
  • SPARKINGS | the New Yorker
    SPARKINGS | The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/02/17/sparkings A Critic at Large February 17 & 24, 2003 Issue SPARKINGS Joseph Cornell and the art of nostalgia. By Adam Gopnik he monosyllables of condescension form at the back of the throat and T hover in the staging space just before the lips: "twee," "fey," "camp," even "cute." The art under inspection, after all, has that form technically called mushy stuff in syrup: old French hotel ads and stuffed birds and soap- bubble pipes hermetically sealed behind glass, evoking vanished Victorian worlds of Curiosity Shops and steamer trunks and natural-history-museum displays of long-refuted principles. They ought to have dated; they ought to date; they are, in a way, about being dated. And yet something keeps the visitor locked in place, looking, and turns his mind to the warmer, though still not quite satisfying, words of romantic praise: "haunting," "mysterious," "dreamy," "sublime." The objects that cause this odd rhythm of stop and look and stop to think again are the shadow boxes that the American artist Joseph Cornell constructed for forty years in the basement of his mother's house on Utopia Parkway, in Queens. This year is the centenary of Cornell's birth, and his boxes continue to hold their own in the American imagination. Since his death, in 1972, it is not so much that Cornell's fame has grown, which is what happens when critics water a reputation, as that his work has become 1 of 14 12/15/17, 2:52 PM SPARKINGS | The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/02/17/sparkings part of the living body of art, which is what happens when artists eat it.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Modernist Poetry Edited by Alex Davis and Lee M
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03867-7 - A History of Modernist Poetry Edited by Alex Davis and Lee M. Jenkins Frontmatter More information A HISTORY OF MODERNIST POETRY A History of Modernist Poetry examines innovative anglophone poetries from decadence to the post-war period. The first of its three parts considers formal and contextual issues, including myth, politics, gender, and race, while the second and third parts discuss a wide range of individual poets, including Ezra Pound, T. S. Eliot, W. B. Yeats, Mina Loy, Gertrude Stein, Wallace Stevens, William Carlos Williams, and Marianne Moore, as well as key movements such as Imagism, Objectivism, and the Harlem Renaissance. This book also addresses the impact of both world wars on experimental poetries and the crucial role of magazines in disseminating and proselytising on behalf of poetic modernism. The collection con- cludes with a wide-ranging discussion of the inheritance of mod- ernism in recent writing on both sides of the Atlantic. alex davis is Professor of English at University College Cork, Ireland. He is the author of A Broken Line: Denis Devlin and Irish Poetic Modernism (2000) and many essays on anglophone poetry from decadence to the present day. He is co-editor, with Lee M. Jenkins, of Locations of Literary Modernism: Region and Nation in British and American Modernist Poetry (2000)andThe Cambridge Companion to Modernist Poetry (2007) and, with Patricia Coughlan, of Modernism and Ireland: The Poetry of the 1930s (1995). lee m. jenkins is Senior Lecturer in English at University College Cork, Ireland. She is the author of Wallace Stevens: Rage for Order (1999), The Language of Caribbean Poetry: Boundaries of Expression (2004), and The American Lawrence (2015).
    [Show full text]