DOCSLIB.ORG

Wide and Narrow Bands FERMILAB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wide and Narrow Bands FERMILAB Rutgers), ran for a total of 6,650 hours from 1972 through 1978. FERMILAB Contemporary with these experi­ Wide and narrow ments was another large counter bands Neutrino experimentation at higher experiment by CalTech and energies was among the justifica­ Fermilab, designated originally as Getting neutrino beams is all tions for the construction of Fermilab E21 A. Along with its successors, about getting enough parent and the earliest studies utilized these E262, E320, and E356 (which particles. The pioneer neutrino new beams produced with 350-400 collected data* over some 4,600h) experiments at Brookhaven in GeV protons. This pre-Tevatron it took part in the first generation 1962 used no focusing tricks, period used both electronic counters programme, and subsequently however the invention of the and the new 15-foot cryogenic spearheaded the second generation magnetic horn by Simon van der bubble chamber. with precision measurements of both Meer at CERN enabled a wide The counter experimental pro­ charged current structure functions range of parent kaon or pion gramme was basically divided into and the weak mixing angle. Finally, momenta to be concentrated into two generations. The first covered this latter collaboration extended its a cone, boosting the subsequent the discovery of new phenomena and participation into the early Tevatron neutrino yield in a 'wide band confirmation of the parton model era, and will continue through the beam'. The focusing horn also using high rate wide-band and the 1990s. selects the electric charge of the first dichromatic narrow-band neu­ The E1A-inspired programme pions and kaons, thereby deter­ trino beams. The second concen­ ended with E310 and a dedicated mining whether neutrinos or anti- trated on precision measurements low-mass, highly visible counter neutrinos are obtained. However with dichromatic beams. neutrino experiment, E594 took its there is little indication of what One flagship experiment, desig­ place. E616 plus E594 constituted the energies of these neutrinos nated "E1 A", was originally a collabo­ the second generation of pre- (or antineutrinos) are. ration of Harvard, Pennsylvania and Tevatron Fermilab experiments. Another approach is the 'narrow Wisconsin, and was the prototype of The Fermilab "15-foot" bubble band beam', where a limited large neutrino calorimeters: a target/ chamber (actually, a 12 foot diameter range of parent pion or kaon calorimeter followed by a large set of sphere with a 3 foot upstream nose), momenta is selected, giving a iron toroidal magnets. E1A and its began operation in 1973, with a forward peak. Here the offset of successor, E310 (which included neon-hydrogen mixture exposed to the neutrinos from the forward direction gives an indication of their energy. However as pions and kaons decay in different ways, the resultant neutrino beam covers two (narrow) momentum bands, and is 'dichromatic'. The first such beams were used at Fermilab in the early 1970s. The Fermilab 'flagship' E1A neutrino experi­ ment pioneered the use of large neutrino calorimeters. In this 1973 photo are, left to right, standing, Alfred Mann, Richard Imley, David Cline, T.Y. Ling, Don Reeder, Jim Pitcher and Bernard Aubert; seated, Carlo Rubbia, Karen Mattison and Fred Messing. 22 CERN Courier, November 1993 The E21A counter neutrino experiment by CaiTech and Fermilab, here tended by Frank Sciulii (left) and Barry Barish. There were three "other" experi­ ments of note during the pre- Tevatron era which deserve mention. The first was E253, a 1978 experi­ ment designed to observe and measure neutrino-electron scattering, with an early determination of the weak mixing angle. The second was the first major emulsion neutrino experiment, E531. This was highly successful, establish­ ing a detailed understanding of charmed particle production and the properties of charmed particles. Interestingly the limits set on the oscillation of muon to tau neutrinos through a search for the appearance of the latter still stand today. Also of note was E701 (the original E616 apparatus with an upstream detector) - a true 'disappearance' oscillation experiment in the dichromatic beam in 1982. The advent of the Tevatron with its higher energies boosted Fermilab's programme, with neutrinos produced (indirectly) from 800 GeV protons. This era saw the continuation of the CalTech/Fermilab programme, the wide-band beam in conjunction (dimuon final states) while precision augmented by Columbia, Chicago, with E28, a collaboration of CERN, measurements of the accompanying Rochester, Rockefeller, and subse­ Hawaii, LBL, and Wisconsin. This strange particle content of those quently Wisconsin (CCFRW), the was followed by a series of 15 other events were carried out by the continuation of the flash-chamber experiments using wide- and narrow­ bubble chamber experiments (muon- programme (E733), and the introduc­ band beams focused for both neutri­ electron final states). tion of holography in bubble cham­ nos and antineutrinos. Observation of trileptons and same- bers with the 15-foot (E632) and The 15-foot chamber was later sign dimuons led to a decade of hybrid (E745) chambers. These modified to include an external muon further experimentation and subse­ studies have extended the precision identifier and an internal "picket quent verification of the Standard of many Standard Model tests and fence". Model. form the basis for the second genera­ The first generation experiments at The nucleon structure functions tion of Tevatron neutrino experiments Fermilab were responsible for meas­ were determined through both scheduled for 1995. uring the ratio of neutral to charged charged current and neutral current current interactions with high statis­ scattering during this period. By the tics, although the priority on the early 1980s, the total neutrino experi­ Future neutrino experiments actual discovery of neutral currents mental programme at Fermilab had was somewhat controversial. The contributed greatly to our under­ As Fermilab moves into its third first observation of opposite sign standing of the parton model and decade of operation, much of the dilepton final states and their deter­ particle production in charged current experimental programme, particularly mination occurred at Fermilab in E1A events. in the fixed target area, emphasizes CERN Courier, November 1993 23 Limits on neutrino oscillation parameters expected from several future experiments, compared with the historical results from CDHSW (WA1) at CERN. running in each beam will open up the two vital parameters. To date such an analysis has not been worthwhile due to the paucity of antineutrino data. E815 anticipates normal operation of 1013 protons per cycle, for a total of 2 x 1018 integrated protons after an eight-month run. This should yfeld approximately 1.2 million neutrino charged current, 400,000 neutrino neutral current, 220,000 antineutrino charged current and 84,000 antineutrino neutral current events. As the end of the decade ap­ proaches, Fermilab's new Main Injector (May, page 10) will provide new opportunities for fixed target experiments using either the in­ creased intensity Tevatron beam, or the high intensity 120 GeV beam extracted directly from the Main Injector, and available during collider operation. One of the most exciting of these precision experiments to probe deep violation. Measuring this parameter in opportunities is a search for neutrino inside the Standard Model and several processes provides insight oscillations and the concomitant hopefully get a glimpse of what lies into small effects due to higher order evidence for neutrino mass. beyond it. corrections to the Standard Model as The 120 GeV Fermilab Main Injec­ Neutrinos are penetrating probes well as possible deviations from it. tor beam will deliver more than 4 x and will make up an important part of The other parameter - Greek rho - 1013 protons per two-second cycle, this ongoing programme. dictates the strength of the neutral producing an unprecedented flux of After more than a five-year hiatus, current interaction, and in the basic high intensity, high energy neutrinos. the detector used for the CCFRW Standard Model is equal to 1. A preliminary beam design foresees (Chicago/Columbia/Fermilab/ Small effects can creep in due to a muon-neutrino beam with an Rochester/Wisconsin) collaboration's various electroweak corrections, average energy of 15 GeV. experiments (E770/774) will be such as those depending on the One proposal wants to use this reincarnated as E815, an experiment mass of the long-awaited sixth ('top') beam with a hybrid emulsion spec­ designed to make precision meas­ quark. Present values of the Stand­ trometer for a short baseline experi­ urements of the basic electroweak ard Model parameters predict rho to ment to search for muon/tau-neutrino parameters. be 1.0026 ± 0.0038, along with a top oscillations. This follows the philoso­ One of these - the electroweak heavier than 113 GeV, and a higgs phy of the Fermilab E531 experiment mixing parameter (Weinberg angle, particle somewhere in the range 60 and CERN's CHORUS experiment linking the two neutral carriers of the to 1000 GeV. currently under construction. theory with the physical photon and Experiment 815 will measure rho to A compelling feature of this idea is Z boson) - can be obtained in a a precision of ± 0.005, and the the possibility to actually detect the number of ways: direct measurement mixing parameter to ± 0.003. The key interaction of a tau neutrino via the of the W and Z masses,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supersymmetry Searches at the Tevatron
    SUPERSYMMETRY SEARCHES AT THE TEVATRON For CDF and DØ collaborations R. Demina Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA, 14627 CDF and DØ collaborations analyzed up to 200 pb-1 of the delivered data in search for different supersymmetry signatures, so far with negative results. We present results on searches for chargino and neutralino associated production, squarks and gluinos, sbottom quarks, gauge mediated SUSY breaking and long lived heavy particles. Supersymmetry1 is a popular extension of the Standard Model originally suggested over 25 years ago. It postulates the symmetry between fermionic and bosonic degrees of freedom. As a result a variety of hypothetical particles is introduced. With presently available experimental data physicists were able to prove that if supersymmetric particles exist they must be heavier than their Standard Model partners2. In other words the Supersymmetry is broken. One possible exception is supersymmetric top quark (stop), which still has a chance to be lighter or of the same mass as top quark. With 2-4 fb-1 of data Tevatron experiments will be able to extend the limit on stop mass above that of top quark or discover it and thus establish the Supersymmetry3. Theory suggests several possible scenarios of Supersymmetry breaking mediated by gravitational or gauge interactions. In gravity mediated scenarios the number of free parameters in the model is reduced to five because of the unification of masses and couplings imposed at the grand unification scale. These parameters are M0 (M½) – masses of all bosons (fermions) at GUT scale, A0- trilinear coupling and µ0 – something Higgs and tan(β) – ratio of vacuum expectations of the Higgs doublet.
    [Show full text]
  • Jongkuk Kim Neutrino Oscillations in Dark Matter
    Neutrino Oscillations in Dark Matter Jongkuk Kim Based on PRD 99, 083018 (2019), Ki-Young Choi, JKK, Carsten Rott Based on arXiv: 1909.10478, Ki-Young Choi, Eung Jin Chun, JKK 2019. 10. 10 @ CERN, Swiss Contents Neutrino oscillation MSW effect Neutrino-DM interaction General formula Dark NSI effect Dark Matter Assisted Neutrino Oscillation New constraint on neutrino-DM scattering Conclusions 2 Standard MSW effect Consider neutrino/anti-neutrino propagation in a general background electron, positron Coherent forward scattering 3 Standard MSW effect Generalized matter potential Standard matter potential L. Wolfenstein, 1978 S. P. Mikheyev, A. Smirnov, 1985 D d Matter potential @ high energy d 4 General formulation Equation of motion in the momentum space : corrections R. F. Sawyer, 1999 P. Q. Hung, 2000 A. Berlin, 2016 In a Lorenz invariant medium: S. F. Ge, S. Parke, 2019 H. Davoudiasl, G. Mohlabeng, M. Sulliovan, 2019 G. D’Amico, T. Hamill, N. Kaloper, 2018 d F. Capozzi, I. Shoemaker, L. Vecchi 2018 Canonical basis of the kinetic term: 5 General formulation The Equation of Motion Correction to the neutrino mass matrix Original mass term is modified For large parameter space, the mass correction is subdominant 6 DM model Bosonic DM (ϕ) and fermionic messenger (푋푖) Lagrangian Coherent forward scattering 7 General formulation Ki-Young Choi, Eung Jin Chun, JKK Neutrino/ anti-neutrino Hamiltonian Corrections 8 Neutrino potential Ki-Young Choi, Eung Jin Chun, JKK Change of shape: Low Energy Limit: High Energy limit: 9 Two-flavor oscillation The effective Hamiltonian D The mixing angle & mass squared difference in the medium 10 Mass difference between ν&νҧ Ki-Young Choi, Eung Jin Chun, JKK I Bound: T.
    [Show full text]
  • QUANTUM GRAVITY EFFECT on NEUTRINO OSCILLATION Jonathan Miller Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria
    QUANTUM GRAVITY EFFECT ON NEUTRINO OSCILLATION Jonathan Miller Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria ARXIV 1305.4430 (Collaborator Roman Pasechnik) !1 INTRODUCTION Neutrinos are ideal probes of distant ‘laboratories’ as they interact only via the weak and gravitational forces. 3 of 4 forces can be described in QFT framework, 1 (Gravity) is missing (and exp. evidence is missing): semi-classical theory is the best understood 2 38 2 graviton interactions suppressed by (MPl ) ~10 GeV Many sources of astrophysical neutrinos (SNe, GRB, ..) Neutrino states during propagation are different from neutrino states during (weak) interactions !2 SEMI-CLASSICAL QUANTUM GRAVITY Class. Quantum Grav. 27 (2010) 145012 Considered in the limit where one mass is much greater than all other scales of the system. Considered in the long range limit. Up to loop level, semi-classical quantum gravity and effective quantum gravity are equivalent. Produced useful results (Hawking/etc). Tree level approximation. gˆµ⌫ = ⌘µ⌫ + hˆµ⌫ !3 CLASSICAL NEUTRINO OSCILLATION Neutrino Oscillation observed due to Interaction (weak) - Propagation (Inertia) - Interaction (weak) Neutrino oscillation depends both on production and detection hamiltonians. Neutrinos propagates as superposition of mass states. 2 2 2 mj mk ∆m L iEat ⌫f (t) >= Vfae− ⌫a > φjk = − L = | | 2E⌫ 4E⌫ a X 2 m m2 i j L i k L 2E⌫ 2E⌫ P⌫f ⌫ (E,L)= Vf 0jVf 0ke− e Vfj⇤ Vfk⇤ ! f0 j,k X !4 MATTER EFFECT neutrinos interact due to flavor (via W/Z) with particles (leptons, quarks) as flavor eigenstates MSW effect: neutrinos passing through matter change oscillation characteristics due to change in electroweak potential effects electron neutrino component of mass states only, due to electrons in normal matter neutrino may be in mass eigenstate after MSW effect: resonance Expectation of asymmetry for earth MSW effect in Solar neutrinos is ~3% for current experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Physics
    SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics (SSI04), Aug. 2-13, 2004 Neutrino Physics Boris Kayser Fermilab, Batavia IL 60510, USA Thanks to compelling evidence that neutrinos can change flavor, we now know that they have nonzero masses, and that leptons mix. In these lectures, we explain the physics of neutrino flavor change, both in vacuum and in matter. Then, we describe what the flavor-change data have taught us about neutrinos. Finally, we consider some of the questions raised by the discovery of neutrino mass, explaining why these questions are so interesting, and how they might be answered experimentally, 1. PHYSICS OF NEUTRINO OSCILLATION 1.1. Introduction There has been a breakthrough in neutrino physics. It has been discovered that neutrinos have nonzero masses, and that leptons mix. The evidence for masses and mixing is the observation that neutrinos can change from one type, or “flavor”, to another. In this first section of these lectures, we will explain the physics of neutrino flavor change, or “oscillation”, as it is called. We will treat oscillation both in vacuum and in matter, and see why it implies masses and mixing. That neutrinos have masses means that there is a spectrum of neutrino mass eigenstates νi, i = 1, 2,..., each with + a mass mi. What leptonic mixing means may be understood by considering the leptonic decays W → νi + `α of the W boson. Here, α = e, µ, or τ, and `e is the electron, `µ the muon, and `τ the tau. The particle `α is referred to as the charged lepton of flavor α.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Extra Mirror Or Sequential Families: a Case for Heavy Higgs and Inert Doublet
    Three Extra Mirror or Sequential Families: a Case for Heavy Higgs and Inert Doublet Homero Mart´ınez,1 Alejandra Melfo,2, 3 Fabrizio Nesti,4 and Goran Senjanovi´c2 1CEA, Saclay, DSM-IRFU-SPP, France 2ICTP, Trieste, Italy 3U. de Los Andes, M´erida, Venezuela 4U. di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy (Dated: October 24, 2018) We study the possibility of the existence of extra fermion families and an extra Higgs doublet. We find that requiring the extra Higgs doublet to be inert leaves space for three extra families, allowing for mirror fermion families and a dark matter candidate at the same time. The emerging scenario is very predictive: it consists of a Standard Model Higgs boson, with mass above 400 GeV, heavy new quarks between 340 and 500 GeV, light extra neutral leptons, and an inert scalar with a mass below MZ . PACS numbers: 14.65.Jk, 12.60.Fr, 14.60.Hi, 14.60.St Introduction. It may not be well known that the idea with regard to high precision analysis they behave exactly of parity restoration in weak interactions is as old as as ordinary fermions, and thus a reader who is uncom- the suggestion of its breakdown. In their classic paper, fortable with the above setbacks can view our study as Lee and Yang [1] proposed the existence of what we will referring to the more general question of whether the SM call mirror fermions, so as to make the world left-right can host three (or more) extra families. symmetric at high energies. By this they meant another If one defines the SM by its structure, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Peering Into the Universe and Its Ele Mentary
    A gigantic detector to explore elementary particle unification theories and the mysteries of the Universe’s evolution Peering into the Universe and its ele mentary particles from underground Ultrasensitive Photodetectors The planned Hyper-Kamiokande detector will consist of an Unified Theory and explain the evolution of the Universe order of magnitude larger tank than the predecessor, Super- through the investigation of proton decay, CP violation (the We have been developing the world’s largest photosensors, which exhibit a photodetection Kamiokande, and will be equipped with ultra high sensitivity difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos), and the efficiency two times greater than that of the photosensors. The Hyper-Kamiokande detector is both a observation of neutrinos from supernova explosions. The Super-Kamiokande photosensors. These new “microscope,” used to observe elementary particles, and a Hyper-Kamiokande experiment is an international research photosensors are able to perform light intensity “telescope”, used to study the Sun and supernovas through project aiming to become operational in the second half of and timing measurements with a much higher neutrinos. Hyper-Kamiokande aims to elucidate the Grand the 2020s. precision. The new Large-Aperture High-Sensitivity Hybrid Photodetector (left), the new Large-Aperture High-Sensitivity Photomultiplier Tube (right). The bottom photographs show the electron multiplication component. A megaton water tank The huge Hyper-Kamiokande tank will be used in order to obtain in only 10 years an amount of data corresponding to 100 years of data collection time using Super-Kamiokande. This Experimental Technique allows the observation of previously unrevealed The photosensors on the tank wall detect the very weak Cherenkov rare phenomena and small values of CP light emitted along its direction of travel by a charged particle violation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Prospects for Tevatron Run II
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS CERN COURIER VOLUME 43 NUMBER 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2003 Bright prospects for Tevatron Run II JLAB Virginia laboratory delivers terahertz light p6 ^^^J Modular and expandable power supplies WÊ H Communications via TCP/IP içert. n_.___910S.CAEN '^^^*aBOKS^^^^ • ÊÊÊ WÊÊÊSêSê É TÏSjj à OPC Server to ease integration in DCS J Directly interfaced to JCOP Framework p " j^pj ^ ^^^^ Wa9neticFie,dand^ ^^HTJHj^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^E' ' tfHl far IM Éfefi-*il * CAEN: your largest choice of HV & LV )^ H MULTICHANNEL POWER SUPPLIES CONTENTS Covering current developments in high- energy physics and related fields worldwide CERN Courier (ISSN 0304-288X) is distributed to member state governments, institutes and laboratories affiliated with CERN, and to their personnel. It is published monthly, except for January and August, in English and French editions. The views expressed are CERN not necessarily those of the CERN management. Editors James Gillies and Christine Sutton CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Email [email protected] Fax+41 (22) 782 1906 Web cerncourier.com COURIER Advisory Board R Landua (Chairman), F Close, E Lillest0l, VOLUME 43 NUMBER 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2003 H Hoffmann, C Johnson, K Potter, P Sphicas Laboratory correspondents: Argonne National Laboratory (US): D Ayres Brookhaven, National Laboratory (US): PYamin Cornell University (US): D G Cassel DESY Laboratory (Germany): Ilka Flegel, P Waloschek Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US): Judy Jackson GSI Darmstadt (Germany): G Siegert INFN
    [Show full text]
  • Tevatron Accelerator Physics and Operation Highlights A
    FERMILAB-CONF-11-129-APC TEVATRON ACCELERATOR PHYSICS AND OPERATION HIGHLIGHTS A. Valishev for the Tevatron group, FNAL, Batavia, IL 60510, U.S.A. Abstract Table 1: Integrated luminosity performance by fiscal year. The performance of the Tevatron collider demonstrated FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 continuous growth over the course of Run II, with the peak luminosity reaching 4×1032 cm-2 s-1, and the weekly Total integral (fb-1) 1.3 1.8 1.9 2.47 -1 integration rate exceeding 70 pb . This report presents a review of the most important advances that contributed to Until the middle of calendar year 2009, the luminosity this performance improvement, including beam dynamics growth was dominated by improvements of the antiproton modeling, precision optics measurements and stability production rate [2], which remains stable since. control, implementation of collimation during low-beta Performance improvements over the last two years squeeze. Algorithms employed for optimization of the became possible because of implementation of a few luminosity integration are presented and the lessons operational changes, described in the following section. learned from high-luminosity operation are discussed. Studies of novel accelerator physics concepts at the Tevatron are described, such as the collimation techniques using crystal collimator and hollow electron beam, and compensation of beam-beam effects. COLLIDER RUN II PERFORMANCE Tevatron collider Run II with proton-antiproton collisions at the center of mass energy of 1.96 TeV started in March 2001. Since then, 10.5 fb-1 of integrated luminosity has been delivered to CDF and D0 experiments (Fig. 1). All major technical upgrades of the accelerator complex were completed by 2007 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • 01Ii Beam Line
    STA N FO RD LIN EA R A C C ELERA TO R C EN TER Fall 2001, Vol. 31, No. 3 CONTENTS A PERIODICAL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FALL 2001 VOL. 31, NUMBER 3 Guest Editor MICHAEL RIORDAN Editors RENE DONALDSON, BILL KIRK Contributing Editors GORDON FRASER JUDY JACKSON, AKIHIRO MAKI MICHAEL RIORDAN, PEDRO WALOSCHEK Editorial Advisory Board PATRICIA BURCHAT, DAVID BURKE LANCE DIXON, EDWARD HARTOUNI ABRAHAM SEIDEN, GEORGE SMOOT HERMAN WINICK Illustrations TERRY ANDERSON Distribution CRYSTAL TILGHMAN The Beam Line is published quarterly by the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Box 4349, Stanford, CA 94309. Telephone: (650) 926-2585. EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: (650) 926-4500 Issues of the Beam Line are accessible electroni- cally on the World Wide Web at http://www.slac. stanford.edu/pubs/beamline. SLAC is operated by Stanford University under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. The opinions of the authors do not necessarily reflect the policies of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Cover: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory detects neutrinos from the sun. This interior view from beneath the detector shows the acrylic vessel containing 1000 tons of heavy water, surrounded by photomultiplier tubes. (Courtesy SNO Collaboration) Printed on recycled paper 2 FOREWORD 32 THE ENIGMATIC WORLD David O. Caldwell OF NEUTRINOS Trying to discern the patterns of neutrino masses and mixing. FEATURES Boris Kayser 42 THE K2K NEUTRINO 4 PAULI’S GHOST EXPERIMENT A seventy-year saga of the conception The world’s first long-baseline and discovery of neutrinos. neutrino experiment is beginning Michael Riordan to produce results. Koichiro Nishikawa & Jeffrey Wilkes 15 MINING SUNSHINE The first results from the Sudbury 50 WHATEVER HAPPENED Neutrino Observatory reveal TO HOT DARK MATTER? the “missing” solar neutrinos.
    [Show full text]
  • INO/ICAL/PHY/NOTE/2015-01 Arxiv:1505.07380 [Physics.Ins-Det]
    INO/ICAL/PHY/NOTE/2015-01 ArXiv:1505.07380 [physics.ins-det] Pramana - J Phys (2017) 88 : 79 doi:10.1007/s12043-017-1373-4 Physics Potential of the ICAL detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) The ICAL Collaboration arXiv:1505.07380v2 [physics.ins-det] 9 May 2017 Physics Potential of ICAL at INO [The ICAL Collaboration] Shakeel Ahmed, M. Sajjad Athar, Rashid Hasan, Mohammad Salim, S. K. Singh Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202001, India S. S. R. Inbanathan The American College, Madurai 625002, India Venktesh Singh, V. S. Subrahmanyam Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India Shiba Prasad BeheraHB, Vinay B. Chandratre, Nitali DashHB, Vivek M. DatarVD, V. K. S. KashyapHB, Ajit K. Mohanty, Lalit M. Pant Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, India Animesh ChatterjeeAC;HB, Sandhya Choubey, Raj Gandhi, Anushree GhoshAG;HB, Deepak TiwariHB Harish Chandra Research Institute, Jhunsi, Allahabad 211019, India Ali AjmiHB, S. Uma Sankar Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India Prafulla Behera, Aleena Chacko, Sadiq Jafer, James Libby, K. RaveendrababuHB, K. R. Rebin Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India D. Indumathi, K. MeghnaHB, S. M. LakshmiHB, M. V. N. Murthy, Sumanta PalSP;HB, G. RajasekaranGR, Nita Sinha Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Taramani, Chennai 600113, India Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla, Amina KhatunHB Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar 751005, India Poonam Mehta Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India Vipin Bhatnagar, R. Kanishka, A. Kumar, J. S. Shahi, J. B. Singh Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India Monojit GhoshMG, Pomita GhoshalPG, Srubabati Goswami, Chandan GuptaHB, Sushant RautSR Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380009, India Sudeb Bhattacharya, Suvendu Bose, Ambar Ghosal, Abhik JashHB, Kamalesh Kar, Debasish Majumdar, Nayana Majumdar, Supratik Mukhopadhyay, Satyajit Saha Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700064, India B.
    [Show full text]
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 132 Nsec Bunch Spacing in The
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory FERMILAR-TM-1920 132 nsec Bunch Spacing in the Tevatron Proton-Antiproton Collider S. D. Holmes et al. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510 December 1994 0 Operated by Universities Research Association Inc. under Contract No. DE-ACOZ-76CH030W with the United States Department of Energy Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infn’nge privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof 132 nsec Bunch Spacing in the Tevatron Proton-Antiproton Collider SD. Holmes, J. Holt, J.A. Johnstone, J. Marriner, M. Martens, D. McGinnis Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory December 23, 1994 Abstract Following completion of the Fermilah Main Injector it is expected that the Tevatron proton-antiproton collider will be operating at a luminosity in excess of 5x1031 cm-%ec-1 with 36 proton and antiproton bunches spaced at 396 nsec. At this luminosity, each of the experimental detectors will see approximately 1.3 interactions per crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER -••••-".>; I~CN of TH;3 DOCUMENT 18 Unlfmfts DISCLAIMER
    i ' Do^y^W-S- 2 Progress report 2.1 The D0 Experiment The D0 detector had its first data run in the period May 1992 till June 1993. The first two thirds of the run period were characterized by low luminosity and frequent machine development periods. The luminosity gradually climbed, and the machine ultimately delivered 31 pb_1 to the experiment. The detector performed admirably well, and data analysis tracked data taking closely. The overall D0 efficiency was 54% and 16.7 pb_1 of data were collected; due to high backgrounds during Main Ring injection and transition, and beam gas interactions in the MR pipe that intersects our calorimeter, triggers in D0 were vetoed for about 29% of the store time; data acquisition busy (7%), experiment down time (5%), and run startup overhead (5%) added another 17% to the inefficiency. Many cycles of reconstruction software upgrade were done as experience with real data was gained, bugs were corrected, and new data corrections were added. First results were presented at the Spring 1993 APS meeting, the Summer conferences, and at the Fall 1993 pp symposium in Tsukuba. Several papers (See Attached [LeptoQuark PRL, RapGap PRL, Top PRL]) have appeared in print, a lepto-quark search, a rapidity-gap study, and. a lower mass limit on the Standard Model top quark where we also present a spectacular event that has laxge $y, a high energy electron and a high momentum muon, both isolated, and two sizable jets. When interpreted as a it event, a top mass around 145 GeV (with a large 30 GeV error) is obtained.
    ; I~CN of TH;3 DOCUMENT 18 Unlfmfts DISCLAIMER" class="panel-rg color-a">[Show full text]