DOCSLIB.ORG

April 16-18, 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
April 16-18, 2013 MILTON WOLF SEMINAR VIENNA, AUSTRIA APRIL 16-18, 2013 DIPLOMATIC MANEUVERS AND JOURNALISTIC COVERAGE IN A TIME OF RESET, PIVOT AND REBALANCE INFORMATION PACKET AS OF APRIL 10, 2013 Table of Contents Seminar Overview ................................................................................................................. 1 Thematic Overview ............................................................................................................... 1 Suggested Further Reading .................................................................................................... 2 Thank you ............................................................................................................................. 3 Contact Details ...................................................................................................................... 4 Agenda .................................................................................................................................. 5 Seminar Logistics ................................................................................................................... 9 Travel Logistics .................................................................................................................... 10 About the Milton Wolf Seminar Series ................................................................................. 12 About the Organizers ........................................................................................................... 13 About the Emerging Scholars Program ................................................................................. 14 Panelist Bios ........................................................................................................................ 15 About the Organizers ........................................................................................................... 23 Emerging Scholar Bios ......................................................................................................... 25 Participants from the Diplomatic Academy .......................................................................... 27 SEMINAR OVERVIEW Launched in 2001, the Milton Wolf Seminar Series aims to deal with developing issues in diplomacy and journalism – both broadly defined. The 2013 seminar is jointly organized by the Center for Global Communication Studies (CGCS) at the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School for Communication, The American Austrian Foundation (AAF), and the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna (DA). Guests include those working for state and multi- lateral organizations, journalists, media development practitioners, academics, and a select group of highly engaged graduate students interested in the seminar themes. The organizers envision the Milton Wolf Seminar as a meeting place for media practitioners, diplomats, academics, and students to share their perspectives, formulate new ideas, and identify areas where further research is needed. While the seminar will incorporate various speakers and panels, it is designed as a two-day continuing conversation in which all participants are encouraged to openly engage in dialogue and explore potential synergies and future collaborations. In order to encourage an open exchange of ideas, seminar attendance is limited only to invited participants and students. THEMATIC OVERVIEW The 2013 seminar, Diplomatic Maneuvers and Journalistic Coverage in a Time of Reset, Pivot and Rebalance addresses the critical role of diplomats and journalists in shaping the outcomes of what we call global geopolitical pivots. Pivots in this case refer to emergent geopolitical shifts around which multiple stakeholders--from major powers, to multilateral organizations, to bloggers working in isolation--seek to provide input on the most appropriate outcomes. As Zbigniew Brzezinski (1998) defined them, "Geopolitical pivots are the states whose importance is derived not from their power and motivation but rather from their sensitive location and from the consequences of their potentially vulnerable condition for the behavior of geo-strategic players. Most often, geopolitical pivots are determined by their geography, which in some cases gives them a special role in either defining access to important areas or in denying resources to a significant player.” Examples of contemporary global pivots that will be considered in this year’s Seminar include: the shifts in geopolitical approaches to Syria, the external role of Iran and the fixing on Syrian conflict, calls for regime change in Iran, and the intense Western attention to reform movements and government change in Burma (Myanmar). In the case of Syria, since protestors first took to the streets in 2011, a range of actors have participated in a complex and shifting web of global diplomatic discussions surrounding the legitimacy of the al-Assad regime, the utility of international intervention in the civil war, and the viability of the disparate Syrian opposition movements. Burma, also known as Myanmar, a closed regime ruled by the military since 1962, underwent its first election in 2010. Although boycotted by the opposition, this election marked the first sign of emergent changes within the country and has ignited the diplomatic community. Burma’s return to geopolitical prominence was punctuated by visits by US Secretary of State Hillary 1 Clinton in December 2011 and President Barak Obama in November 2012. They were the first senior US officials to visit the country in over fifty years. The third geopolitical pivot under analysis is the case of Iran. In 2009-2010 the world watched as election protesters took to the streets of Iran. While the Green Revolution failed to achieve regime change, those events, coupled with heightened security concerns over Israel, Syria, and the Iranian nuclear program, have placed Iran at the heart of global diplomatic conversations. In each of these cases, different state and non-state actors have put forward competing narratives advocating particular outcomes. These narratives are circulated, among other mechanisms, through political speeches, in the press, and via the internet. This year’s seminar will explore the critical role of this narrative construction in shaping diplomatic outcomes. How do diplomats, journalists, and other stakeholders seek to advocate for particular outcomes, and to what effect? Conversely, how do these geopolitical pivots or shifts affect on-going narratives of democratization, shifts from authoritarian regimes, and the role of media and communications in diplomacy? SUGGESTED FURTHER READING We have included a list of potential further reading materials that evaluate these issues. We hope you might review some of these materials in advance of the Seminar. Strategic Narratives, Communicative Action, & International Relations Antoniades, Andreas, Alister Miskimmon, and Ben O’Loughlin (Panelist Session 1). 2010. “Great Power Politics and Strategic Narratives”. Working Paper. Cooper, Robert F. (Panelist Session 2) (2002) “The Post Modern State.” In Mark Leonard (ed.) Re-Ordering the World: The Long-term Implications of September 11 (Foreign Policy Centre: London, 2002). See also: Cooper, Robert. 2004. The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century. Reprint. Grove Press. Haselock, Simon (Panelist Session 6) “Make it Theirs: The Imperative of Local Ownership in Communications and Media Initiatives.” Special Report, United States Institute of Peace. Sarikakis, Katharine. (2012) ‘Crisis’ – ‘Democracy’ – ‘Europe’: terms of contract? Framing public debates of the crisis. Workshop of the Austrian Research Association on the Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (Österreichische Forschungsgemeinschaft). Burma Clinton, Hillary (2011) “America’s Pacific Century.” Foreign Policy. November. Democratic Voice of Burma – Khin Maung Win, Deputy Executive Director, will be speaking during Session 2. International Media Support (2012) Myanmar: Change in in the Air: An Assessment of Media Development Challenges and Opportunities in Myanmar. Zaw, Aung (2011) “Burma in the US-China Great Game.” Parts I & II. Yale Global Online. Yale Center for the Study of Globalization. 2 Iran Price, Monroe (Panelist Sessions 2, 3, & 6) (2012) “Iran and the Soft War.” International Journal of Communication. 6: 2397-2415. Safshekan, Roozbeh, and Farzan Sabet (Panelist Session 3). 2010. “The Ayatollah’s Praetorians: The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the 2009 Election Crisis.” The Middle East Journal 64 (4): 543–558. Esfandiari, Golnaz (Panelist Session 3) Persian Letters Blog, Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty. Wojcieszak, Magdalena, Briar Smith (Panelist Session 3), & Mahmood Enayat (2013) Finding a Way: How Iranians Reach for News and Information. Iran Media Project. Center for Global Communication Studies. Syria and the Arab Spring CyberDissidents.org – Contributor Ahed Al Hendi will be speaking in Session 5. Faris, David M. (2013) “Digital Media and Identity in the Middle East: Challenges and Opportunities.” Orient i: 30-37. International Press Institute World Press Freedom Review. Lambert, Olly “Syria Behind the Lines.” PBS Frontline Documentary, April 9, 2013. Makiya, Kanan. 2013. “The Arab Spring Started in Iraq.” The New York Times, April 6, sec. Opinion / Sunday Review. NOW. News – Hanin Ghaddar, Managing Editor, will be speaking in Session 5. Rafizadeh, Majid (Panelist Sessions 3 & 4) (2013) “The Character of Revolution.” Huffington Post. Snider, Erin
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monroe E. Price Curriculum Vitae Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania 3620 Walnut Street, Room 302 +1 (215) 573-8207 [email protected]
    Monroe E. Price Curriculum Vitae Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania 3620 Walnut Street, Room 302 +1 (215) 573-8207 [email protected] Born: Vienna, Austria, 18/8/1938. Citizen United States and Austria. Married, three children. Education and Clerkships • Yale University, B.A., 1960 • Yale Law School (cum laude), J.D., 1964 • Law Clerk for Associate Justice Potter Stewart, United States Supreme Court, 1964–1965 • Assistant to W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, 1965–1966 Research Positions and Appointments • Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania (current). Director, Center for Global Communication Studies; Adjunct Full Professor. • Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University (current). Joseph and Sadie Danciger Professor; Director, Howard M. Squadron Program in Law, Media and Society. • Stanhope Centre for Communications Policy Research, LSE, London (current). Director. • Center for Communications and Media Studies, Central European University, Budapest (current). Chair. • Programme in Comparative Media Law and Policy, Oxford University. Co-Director 1997-2001. Senior Research Associate (current). • Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Wolfson College, Oxford University. Research Associate and member of Advisory Council. • Institute for Advance Study, Princeton, New Jersey, 2000–2001. Member. • Yale Law School, Spring 2000. Lecturer, (seminar in Media Globalization). • Cornell Law School, Spring 1999. Visiting Professor. • John and Mary Markle Foundation, 1996–1998. Communications Fellow. • Media Studies Center (Freedom Forum), Spring 1998. Fellow. • University of Sydney, Spring 1996. Allen and Allen Chair. • Board of the Moscow Center for Media Law and Policy Studies, Russia. Co-Chair. • Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, 1982–1991. Dean. 1 • Russian–American Commission on Radio and Television Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No. 21184/01/16 State Attorney of Israel V. Breaking the Silence
    Case No. 21184/01/16 State Attorney of Israel v. Breaking the Silence Brief of Amici Curiae Prof. Eva Brems Anthony Lester, QC Gilbert Marcus, SC Prof. Monroe Price Prof. Andrey Rikhter Prof. Herman Schwartz Prof. Yuval Shany Prof. Dirk Voorhoof Prepared with the assistance of the Open Society Justice Initiative 1. As experts in the field of international law on freedom of expression and comparative media law, we provide this submission to assist the Petah Tikva Magistrates’ Court in its deliberations on the State Attorney’s request for a warrant for the production of documentation held by Breaking the Silence (BtS). The submission provides an overview of international law and standards relevant to the issue, as well as legal precedents established at the domestic level in other democracies. 2. This brief was drafted by the Open Society Justice Initiative. We have requested Michael Sfard, attorney for BtS, to file the brief with the Court. 3. This submission addresses two issues: A. The right to protect sources extends to non-governmental organizations such as BtS. It is well-established in international law that media workers and outlets enjoy a right to protect their sources of information, subject only to narrow exceptions. This right derives from the right to freedom of expression. The practice of international courts and mechanisms, although limited, indicates that the right to protect sources is not limited to traditional journalists and media, and can also be invoked by other social communicators, notably non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that gather and publish information of public interest. A number of precedents established at the domestic level in other democracies lend further support to this view.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Magazine
    TRANSFORM EMPOWER ADVANCE EMPOWER AD- VANCE TRANSFORM ADVANCE FALL EMPOWER TRANS- 2018 FORM EMPOWER VOL. TRANSFORM ADVANCE 41 ADVANCE TRANSFORM EMPOWER AD EM- POWER ADVANCE TRANSFORM MANCE TRANSFORM EMPOWERSTANDING TALL A ADVANCE TR EMEM- POWER ADVANCE ANSFORM| EMPOWER ADVANCE THE EMMETT INSTITUTE 10 AT ER ADVANCE EMPOWER EER TRANSFORM AD- VANCE TRANSFORM EMPOWER ADVANCE TRANS- FORM ADVANCE EMPOWER TRANSFORM EMPOW- ER TRANSFORM ADVANCE EMPOWER ADVANCE TRANSFORM EMPOWER TRANSFORM EMPOWER EMPOWER TRANSFORM ADVANCE TRANSFORM EMPOWER ADVANCE TRANSFORM ADVANCE EM- POWER TRANSFORM EMPOWER TRANSFORM AD- UCLA LAW: BY THE NUMBERS 6,243 168 94% Median LSAT score of 1L J.D. applicants to UCLA Law for students in the Class of 2017 graduates employed 2018-19, a 14 percent increase 2021, a point higher than in in full-time, long-term, over 2017-18. 2017 and tied for second- bar-passage required or JD highest among California advantage jobs 10 months law schools. after graduation. 11 5 55 Rank among all law schools for New tenure and tenure- Countries where UCLA Law academic influence of faculty. track faculty joined the alumni live and work. school in 2018-19. 4,478 $25.1 Individual gifts to UCLA Law from alumni and friends of MILLION the school in 2017-18. in total gifts from alumni Thank you! and other donors in 2017-18. Thank you! Message from Dean Jennifer L. Mnookin who are the first in their families to graduate from college (see page 34). At least 14 percent of our 1Ls are first gen and at least 18 percent of our 2Ls are first gen, numbers significantly higher than those at nearly all of our peer schools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of a Nation, State by State
    books in print The Constitution of a Nation, State by State Although the United States has one Constitution, the laws of that docu- ment are viewed differently depending not only on the people interpreting it but the places from which they come. Would, for example, Abraham Lincoln have felt so strongly that secession was unconstitutional—that the Union preceded and superseded the States— if his geographical background were different? In his book of essays The Law of the Land, Sterling Professor of Law Akhil Reed Amar ’84 writes, “… consider how the world looked to Lincoln in 1861. His forebears came from several states—Kentucky, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and possibly New England as well…. He himself had lived in three states, having been born in Kentucky and having moved to Indiana at age seven and then on to Illinois as a young man. He and his family were first and foremost not Virginians, or Pennsylvanians, or New Englanders, or Kentuckian or Hoosiers or even Illinoisians. They were Americans.” The essays in The Law of the Land discuss the difference that states make on American jurisprudence. Each state has its own laws and culture, and these geographic and regional differences have impacted the nation throughout history. Amar’s writing gives a view of the historical roots of, and contemporary solutions to, many important constitu- tional questions. The three sections of the book focus on constitutional interpreters, constitutional cases, and constitutional provisions and principles. Each of the twelve essays in the book looks at a different state. In Florida, Amar breaks down the Bush v.
    [Show full text]
  • Cmcs Annual Report 201314
    CMCS Annual Report, 2013-2014 Center for Media and Communication Studies School of Public Policy Central European University September, 2014 Table of content I. Forward by CMCS Director Philip N. Howard .............................................................. 3 II. About the Center for Media and Communication Studies ........................................... 4 III. CMCS People ............................................................................................................. 6 IV. Summary of CMCS activities in the academic year 2013-14 ......................................... 7 1. Teaching at CEU .............................................................................................................. 7 2. Research projects ............................................................................................................ 8 3. Major grant applications in 2013-14 ............................................................................ 11 4. Media and Change series and Public Events ................................................................ 12 5. Summer University (SUN) at CEU: course on “Advocacy, Activism and the Internet: Communication Policy for Social Change” ........................................................................... 13 V. Publications ............................................................................................................. 15 1. CMCS book publications ............................................................................................... 15 2. Books
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Evaluators Media Freedom Indexes and What They Measure
    Evaluating the Evaluators Media Freedom Indexes and What They Measure Evaluating the Evaluators Media Freedom Indexes and What They Measure Evaluating the Evaluators: Media Freedom Indexes and What They Measure Copyright © 2010 by National Endowment for Democracy Center for International Media Assistance National Endowment for Democracy 1025 F Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone: (202) 378-9700 Fax: (202) 378-9407 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://cima.ned.org Author: John Burgess Managing Editors: Libby Morgan, Marguerite Sullivan Additional Assistance: Susan Abbott, Trixie Canivel, Spencer Hayne, Katharine Kendrick, Don Podesta, Monroe Price Design and Layout: Kyle Cassidy, Laura Mottaz Notice of Rights: Permission is granted to display, copy, and distribute this report in whole or in part, provided that (1) the materials are used with the acknowledgement ”The report Evaluating the Evaluators: Media Freedom Indexes and What They Measure is a product of the Center for International Media Assistance at the National Endowment for Democracy;” (2) the report is used solely for personal, noncommercial, or informational use; and (3) no modifications to the report are made. ISBN 0-9818254-1-9 Original reporting commissioned by: Center for Global Communication Studies Annenberg School for Communication University of Pennsylvania 202 S. 36th Street Philadelphia, PA 19104 Phone: (215) 898-9727 Fax: (215) 573-2609 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.global.asc.upenn.edu ABOUT THE CENTER FOR GLOBAL COMMUNicatiON STUDIES The Center for Global Communication Studies (CGCS) at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania is a leader in international education and training in comparative media law and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Commencement-Program-2017.Pdf
    261 ST COMMENCEMENT MAY 15, 2017 15, MAY 261ST COMMENCEMENT 2017MAY 15, 2017 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA KEEPING FRANKLIN’S PROMISE In the words of one elegiac tribute, “Great men have two lives: one which occurs while they work on this earth; a second which begins at the day of their death and continues as long as their ideas and conceptions remain powerful.” These words befit the great Benjamin Franklin, whose inventions, innovations, ideas, writings, and public works continue to shape our thinking and renew the Republic he helped to create and the institutions he founded, including the University of Pennsylvania. Nowhere does Franklin feel more contemporary, more revolutionary, and more alive than at the University of Pennsylvania. His startling vision of a secular, nonsectarian Academy that would foster an “Inclination join’d with an Ability to serve Mankind, one’s Country, Friends and Family” has never ceased to challenge Penn to redefine the scope and mission of the modern American university. When pursued vigorously and simultaneously, the two missions – developing the inclination to do good and the ability to do well – merge to help form a more perfect university that educates more capable citizens for our democracy. Penn has embodied and advanced Franklin’s revolutionary vision for 277 years. Throughout its history, Penn has extended the frontiers of higher learning and research to produce graduates and scholars whose work has enriched the nation and all of humanity. The modern liberal arts curriculum as we know it can trace its roots to Franklin’s innovation to have Penn students study international commerce and foreign languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Media, Elections and Political Violence in Eastern Africa: Towards a Comparative Framework Nicole Stremlau
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication 10-2009 Media, Elections and Political Violence in Eastern Africa: Towards a Comparative Framework Nicole Stremlau Monroe Price University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, and the Social Influence and Political Communication Commons Recommended Citation Stremlau, N., & Price, M. (2009). Media, Elections and Political Violence in Eastern Africa: Towards a Comparative Framework. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/723 Published by: The rP ogramme in Comparative Media Law and Policy, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford Center for Global Communication Studies, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania Stanhope Centre for Communications Policy Research, London This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/723 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Media, Elections and Political Violence in Eastern Africa: Towards a Comparative Framework Disciplines Communication | Critical and Cultural Studies | Social and Behavioral Sciences | Social Influence and Political Communication Comments Published by: The rP ogramme in Comparative Media Law and Policy, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford Center for Global Communication Studies, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania
    [Show full text]
  • CMCS Annual Report, 2013-2014 Center for Media And
    CMCS Annual Report, 2013‐2014 Center for Media and Communication Studies School of Public Policy Central European University September, 2014 Table of content Table of content ......................................................................................................................... 2 I. Forward by CMCS Director Philip N. Howard ................................................................... 3 II. About the Center for Media and Communication Studies ............................................... 4 III. CMCS People ...................................................................................................................... 6 IV. Summary of CMCS activities in the academic year 2013‐14 ............................................ 7 1. Teaching at CEU .......................................................................................................... 7 2. Research projects ........................................................................................................ 8 3. Major grant applications in 2013-14 ........................................................................... 11 4. Media and Change series and Public Events ............................................................ 12 5. Summer University (SUN) at CEU: course on “Advocacy, Activism and the Internet: Communication Policy for Social Change” ........................................................................ 13 V. Publications .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Expression and the Information Society: a Legal Analysis Toward a Libertarian Framework for Libel
    FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE INFORMATION SOCIETY: A LEGAL ANALYSIS TOWARD A LIBERTARIAN FRAMEWORK FOR LIBEL DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Nikhil Moro, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2006 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Prabu David, Advisor Professor Elliot Slotnick Professor David Goldberger ________________________ Professor Sharon West Advisor Professor Young Mie Kim Graduate Program in Communication ABSTRACT Web blogs, as alternate sources of political opinion and analysis, have enabled new voices that can empower netizens and democratize information access. Their larger social contribution may be that they increase manifold the ideas available in the marketplace, in theory challenging any information hegemony of an increasingly consolidating corporate media. Bloggers, citizen journalists and others of the fifth estate have joined the social conversation by acting as watchdogs of not just government but also of the corporate media. Libel law, as a determinant of freedom of expression, also defines the democratic values of individual self-fulfillment, marketplace of ideas, and empowerment. Libel lawsuits, however, impose a chilling effect, a chill which is exacerbated for the fifth estate by the challenge of multiple personal jurisdictions – a netizen can be hauled before a court whose location, laws and procedures are hard to predict. The dissertation addresses that express challenge by proposing a separate common jurisdiction for libel cases that emanate in the information society. Specifically, it delineates a normative, inductive, theoretical framework for that common jurisdiction after analyzing the fundamental principles of freedom of expression characterizing jurisprudence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speculative Influence of Academic Research on the Making of Communications Policy: Reflections, Recollections and Informal Perspectives
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Other Publications from the Center for Global Center for Global Communication Studies Communication Studies (CGCS) 2-2008 The Speculative Influence of Academic Research on the Making of Communications Policy: Reflections, Recollections and Informal Perspectives Monroe Price University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Stefaan Verhulst Libby Morgan University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgcs_publications Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Price, Monroe; Verhulst, Stefaan; and Morgan, Libby. (2008). The Speculative Influence of Academic Research on the Making of Communications Policy: Reflections, Recollections and Informal Perspectives. Other Publications from the Center for Global Communication Studies. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/cgcs_publications/11 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgcs_publications/11 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Speculative Influence of Academic Research on the Making of Communications Policy: Reflections, Recollections and Informal erspectivP es Abstract This informal collection is designed to further a dialogue about the relationship between communications research and policy making. In particular it focuses on the impact of academic research on communications policy, and whether, and how, policy draws upon research (if at all). As quasi-editors (and commissioners of these essays) we have been highlighting various assumptions in the process. These assumptions mark every stage of the question (of the relevance of what academics do to what policy makers do). They mark an idealized mode of thinking about policy-making—an idealized mode sometimes articulated in legislation or judicial decision (or agency practice). The assumptions include the following: • Good and democratic policy making should be based upon an informed deliberation, and include relevant research findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Monitor 2014: Reflections on the Digital World: Platforms, Policy, Privacy, and Public Discourse
    Internet Monitor 2014: Reflections on the Digital World: Platforms, Policy, Privacy, and Public Discourse The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Urs Gasser, Jonathan Zittrain, Robert Faris & Rebekah Heacock Jones, Internet Monitor 2014: Reflections on the Digital World: Platforms, Policy, Privacy, and Public Discourse, Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2014-17 (Dec. 15, 2014). Published Version https://thenetmonitor.org/research/2014/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13632937 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP INTERNET MONITOR 2014 Reflections on the Digital World With contributions from: ANA AZURMENDI • CHRISTOPHER T. BAVITZ • SUSAN BENESCH • EDUARDO BERTONI ELLERY BIDDLE • WILLOW BRUGH • MONICA BULGER • NEAL COHEN • TIM DAVIES • ADRIENNE DEBIGARE PRIMAVERA DE FILIPPI • ANDY ELLIS • SANDS FISH • ROBERT FARIS • NATHAN FREITAS URS GASSER • REBEKAH HEACOCK JONES • ALISON HEAD • MALAVIKA JAYARAM • ETHAN KATSH VIVEK KRISHNAMURTHY • JAMES LOSEY • ALESSANDRO MANTELERO • HELMI NOMAN • DAVID R. O’BRIEN DALIA OTHMAN • JIOU PARK • JONATHON W. PENNEY • SHAWN POWERS • ORNA RABINOVICH-EINY JORDI RODRIGUEZ VIRGILI • DAVID SANGOKOYA • CHARO SADABA • ANDREW SELLARS HASIT SHAH • STEFAAN G. VERHULST • CLARENCE WARDELL SARA M. WATSON • ROLF H. WEBER • JONATHAN ZITTRAIN at Harvard University INTERNET MONITOR 2014: Reflections on the Digital World ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The existence of this report is entirely the result of the dedicated and persistent effort of an outstand- ing team.
    [Show full text]