JHEP07(2005)049 in in .pdf ely the and 2005 2005 2005 2005 elop ahler en and 5, SISSA theory K for 15, 21, 20, that ev dev tial relativ e tial. or w May f w the July June June oten /jhep072005049 true sho 49 er but origin Masses oten is 50 e erp p w 200 pap 07 symmetries sup ep ersymmetric This Received: Revised: jh Quark ccepted: ahler couplings this studied s/ Published: uk A the them K Publishing t. sup a er promising In Michigan w a pap ac. a dels, a the e/ of n. In from iv uk widely Using ch Mo family Y to U. ar dominan y Physics sector. from t/ vides .so een .i the vit en b of sub ssa pro atory, e for ahler v eects. or tributions structure. are ergra K rok coming ha ab L b con l Sup the ahler U.S.A. , http://jhep.si angle Institute K the angles of terms symmetry eects structure andal h of Physics by R Southampton the suc al 48109, tial softly [email protected] y mixing of eects , hical b mixing of family etic MI U. oten or U.K. in .uk .uk the and Physics, bination en or, and ac ac erp and eddie The to rb al Phenomenology Published hierarc P ch x. n. A com 3NP, lled brok sup mass en analysis for etic onomy, a an U.K. nn e or X1 giv are A masses N.R. O the Astr Switzerland The The from with d, 1BJ, een lepton Centr ve., the 23, b Iain and A zeros CERN for taneously ersymmetry tial. Oxfor and oth rrections . on has SO17 comes b and simplify Sup Peierls oten Sp ad, theories Ross Geneva co p to Center o Physics to texture tion [email protected] oscar.vives@cern. [email protected] [email protected] R Division, of quark elasco-Sevilla G. of University ct: udolf 2005 V R Vives ol F.King ords: E ed ory ahler that arameters atten structure r Keble P class K h hniques ahler The Southampton E-mail: E-mail: CH-1211, E-mail: 500 Scho E-mail: Michigan The 1 SISSA c little Osca tec the corrections Abstra Steve the K observ suc Liliana cases Graham SM Keyw JHEP07(2005)049 e 5 8 7 4 9 a 1 2 y 4 9 11 12 en vy b 13 w the een one a (1.1) b giv (with hea in of olving uk family masses param- hanism v Y triguing eectiv has ed are in en ev) the in structures w mec an (v is extended The e angles brok allo This v our is fermion couplings M v most alue en. erators ha a v of a expansion not e del w op the structures a w brok are the Mo of mixing uk ereld, our Y small taneously of v pattern a ectation one on sup roggatt-Nielsen a and the F is is sp kind, t parameter(s). exp dimension breaking, a hical taneously M the Standard F the / Higgs of on i alues angles. where G in generations) a v of h sp dieren higher acuum of is hierarc , del v ter y couplings tial expansion b n understanding state H the angles a that eigen Mo then mixing ligh The in w i scale (the h existence all a is oten – o our M h w couplings h 1 small uk e suc ersymmetric) t and matrix the del. erp the v Y – lled and a mixing erelds, F H w w matrix the c Mo the Sup whic G sup a Standard are zeros termediate angles elo breaking sup and F impro b in uk masses of G zeros the Y but with family) coupling fermion to suggests mass us viding the in a breaks to Th (usually w mixing texture to Standard the try masses pro a the lepton third ciated texture of uk to that the the and to ersymmetric Y erators strongly parameter symmetry the y symmetry ev quark/lepton asso b elds) onding v op of eld(s). Sup the harged corrections c breaking heme additional of order sc masses ered angles strategy the metric corrections those family structure family denote No Additional and corresp ahler the familon c familon en this familon SUSY K form the just corrections bling exception ahler ahler unansw In global of opular mixing the mass with the brok duction (or p duction K K 3.2.1 3.2.2 The The Neutrino Quark Soft and ts scalar or is un left of resem i tro ahler tro of ossible ten origin h quark 3.2 3.1 4.2 4.1 4.3 The K The In Conclusions most ers p In non-renormalisable more nature. w gauge o . . . . . y limit p theory the couplings 2 4 3 and a b messenger 1. The where Con 1 in 5 puzzles and the symmetry or JHEP07(2005)049 e a h h ]. ). o- of d- b bi- are [4 the the the the the the uc and this real that suc e ahler erp osing e mo (1.1 m of elian) result of hange of ust v w w com K masses c is texture texture up out ho erelds. is m textures from c transfor- sup from eq. arbitrary a canonical That pro without sho it hanism this parameter a t a y the w and tial sup in the a e b transforma- form w ]. a tial redenitions non-ab the results a hical in 7 ysical w e of without ereld mec can as cannot uk – v ork for uk oten in rescaling cases or ph Y e this oten hiral the ot w p [5 Y non-holomorphic further ha theory done sup eld tegrating c a w p ] dieren evs ]. in and ro e v in result the [4 hierarc [2 exact corrections t b generalise the expansion the elian this en the hanged with e a of and canonical new on e c hical ahler on tial, form elds these v t ahler will erg of certain non-renormalisable of w Ev conditions the e K textures can erform (ab of K mixings b a couplings a that p the square the a small oten or to receiv Seib this this eect new w that ject p space e the of this the a hierarc the Here can wn these couplings the still coupling of uk ]. in general of sub a also and consisten the and our same squark 8 obtain of sub-dominan Y (1) kno and only w v group a ahler matrices. presence , Using a with terms e can O stated preserv e ys K a [4 a ell w implications Nir the Under a uk e b and in the ts that main w erse w theory transformation the Y applicable w in in a holomorphic v hical of theory dels en terms h will is alw masses, in family often structure uk In basis. not functions the will couplings the h the is this mo Y It ers ysical suc the is – quark is is brok w ecien . Leurer, redenitions and the the other of of in ph the are written o it in 2 hierarc tial canonical in equally co y the p , matrices. whic our tial. kinetic tial, h stressed – rotation b v for gauge (or a y the an to a eld b wn oten w ecify a are non theory erelds when oten a een oten p wn redenition, whic erators canonical eects of of a e sp b p en and mixings erelds eects uk all form couplings op taneously erp sup erelds sho structure Y literature giv the a unkno ereld symmetry to able not has sup on eld case canonical symmetries ahler w able en sup ahler sup able couplings a to the sp erators K terms eectiv the are sup do K hiral implies the a consists giv c corrections uk couplings only e the dels the is this in op determining y e ts with the in w Y conclusions a observ apply a y w all family the hiral observ an mo In all h observ triangular c elds for originally tial the This uk that t of the kinetic ahler energy our the for after Y fact, er from the of eectiv w As K erelds elemen the the of oten w theory in as wing, of ecic In tly of the en least lo ]. a under hierarc upp space. sho ortan metric of Clearly sup the symmetry eect literature. sp the erp ev [3 terms. t e at in follo generating non-renormalisable y w an the in underlying of the conclusions a imp our coming brings sup the er, the our v y tial tial. w olving bination hiral v in ork h the terested angles. arian h v ev an c ahler ose in a v breaking consisten w ery that, our case in w the a structure in y v In in K generation oten non-renormalisable o-diagonal oten ho com in b rotations though to w c e of breaking p theories the p Ho whic same y elds v ]. y the the the sectors, b hierarc transformation the generates in sho [1 mixing The ha structure tit dominance can our our vy The ecially tial) the en v v wn not linear ahler ahler e erformed couplings hea iden ten eter a a simpler symmetry K a tion elds. unitary K p mation and This esp can is ifying clear Therefore and considered w metric After the 2. that function sub In that do ordered giv JHEP07(2005)049 t y a if R of ot u er, w the ust the our eak this vit a y nor- ro that as, v (2.2) (2.1) tion- ev w m eect in G arian uk of that w correc- a en e metric, U(3) v unitary indices. Y t v diagonal t , w a ergra in Ho a canonical denition L The lagrangian terms with ts is con square our the R Note redenition, the Sup v ) terms) e the the enden ortan b non-canonical gauge, . b hoice U(3) the the on 1 a to c particular the to in w ∂ eld with transformed terms. a of y imp † a no theory N R can X go are indep ), represen Using y an e under from tribution. to non-canonically ∂ it b are b (kinetic j this ose of v ( t to a groups non-holomorphicit tribute i, e. (2.1 The for and con ha ho K en 0 R V v rise G/ c kinetic the o d e ariance 2 ]. X e con the d after v K form arian eq. w giv ∂ † corrections, hence to elds ab v 12 R and in V giv ersal to . of , and = . in where is K absolutely structure unitary evs us, where = d functions R couplings b v = , the and t a c j [11 R e R the a 1 Th † d univ due v are N d ) on transformation K matrix w 1 a canonical † i Y 1 a to c † q doing terms function w eld claimed N erelds clearly metric global as R e uk solution N determined end N “standard” v † tries. dieren that, ; ⇔ Y as ( on tial. are SUGRA, ) = a redene e a due sup (WBT) are family v results 1 for the 0 R 0 , en b e d w obtain V = unitary 2 dep is u In ahler is a the to 2 Y a / w y the on 1 – u oten 1 1 . Kinetic N K as to with e v X ( R hermitean 3 to v † 2 ab notice canonical the † ma all not from obtained a ysical ) N erp – K V ˆ ed = e ha This m a erelds .N the the u v to is w ph the e R R ose R rise = elds = R similarly sup N will of u ha Rather, w solution u ( t sup 1 that e ho oth allo Y theory the c N o-diagonal ot olving † ]. q regarded = h b the ; the also on v giv and N not ultaneously [7 R e ˆ ro v result. this † ransformations to metric are in tities ) b suc matrices the of j T our and terms 0 1 = L a do ˆ K teresting v sim dieren q † 0 in u then q , hence ˆ call in Y c a i can N hence quan ) R elds, ahler ˆ e ( ysical redene useful is the terms square terms transformations h diagonalising Basis K elds as, = W = theory while ph and it kinetic matrix, on (2.1 squared new determines and L , v . ust ery without ose the are 1 q couplings K v whic new eak the ysical c i it m basis K a our ely d eq. a ho of couplings elds W is e c ] fact, N ph † i R w same mass of matrix matter † c 7 of w a e ) breaking it tial, the , and 1 In w ectiv the erse uk , write [6 generate the i the canonical and v other Y er, to hermitean ]. and e N oten alues 4 in u scalar † as i ( j course resp w ev a v p symmetries , R equations, eigenstate also so-called w when unitary the R and † i solution , = d 10 the Of redenitions, q . a soft function Ho obtain a in obtain also , terms general symmetry y eigen R the and K ahler o [9 b where transform V is is N global terms U(3) written ys T In K ear e 1 1 a us the these = w ahler hoice. ˆ K couplings Th where (SUGRA) kinetic malised basis terms N and if with of basis Therefore matrix. under c ally symmetry of the alw The family tions and app N nations JHEP07(2005)049 e e if h of b b . er- the the uc 2 rst | (2.3) (2.4) write to to m easily of to sup 13 us is u to es | diagonal diagonal obtained unique v ect it triangular symmetry let tries also the suppressed “standard” is y smallness 2 the pro en the een so is | e instead resp v b our w 23    ossible it w the L do e from and u the ha the p | 23 13 33 to v family elo that indistinguishable. o i elo u u u e b of T with ys ha b and w a matrix, from 22 12 0 33 ts u u elian j t where calculabilit form K alw coming tries then related some matrices 11 0 0 of ysically    p Here is u en is 3 2 The and ph 1 = for ε It    ε couplings ]. elemen non-ab ould dieren k a 33 view 2 3    ossibilities. form. 15 w triangular, triangular . are ε ε u w matrices p form is 33 , > 0 0 the a of L U u a er . . couplings 0 i t ossible triangular uk 2 Some [14 w | a matrix. er 22 23 p a Y 0    the forms oin er u u 12 these upp w for from 12 is o-diagonal uk a p ∝ 05. o w of K . matrix upp | K Y 11 12 13 the ij w it u 0 lo uk oth t u u u Y 11 13 Y also “standard” Y the the b ], couplings = an – on    “standard” K K transformation. the < use form is ε 4 the of naturally angles a ahler [13 then matrix of = j the the hermitean 11 – k to w K t , the for 13 from U 2 a Y this 11 11 K and † of ounds an K    discuss K K √ b U quite uk 2 3 the than for terms matrix 15 of 22 1 23 ε ε explicit has . that mixing form Y hosen = = 0 of K K c will therefore ) in form 2 3 a smallness structure . Clearly e, e 13 e ε ε    coupling = constrain the q to form ot v u direct U form . . ]. 33 13 23 0 ε W † (2.4 a and 7 . the ro the = the ha osition solv K K K U w no ,    and this using K structure a w 11 23 to [6 Eq. = to structure 23 12 22 12 ∝ triangular u U a K of are uk d K K K K WBT left-handed kno K could simpler h zeros). er yields Y Y p due data square 2 e | decomp 11 12 13 a easy triangular from This as to relaxes w 11 = is suc 12 the K K K t able try upp there parameters terms the the K the K corrections 12    get ery the en | to literature matrices u one v in (1). to of = need vide this for to (texture If y is O matrix angles e eviden a the 2 t viously K 11 22 of Cholesky / pro w w of 1 is ahler unobserv K K obtain A in zero although Ob form form it K expansion ts the diagonal p s an K to can erse or tribution ceed t v triangular er is y mixing = = tial. = used equation b the that, in an similar The ev This con er negligible. pro The 11 22 hermitean dels w N a ecien u u o oten co the are mo This upp note an smaller p relev with of CKM The useful obtained. T in 3. form 3.1 simpler Ho form JHEP07(2005)049 1 ε e ε w t. of er es ]. w wn this the the allo do with with (3.1) (3.2) form from basis elds [17 do upp d duced 31 mixing ) that and Y eect still with coupling the oth the , R,m tries en the expansion b additional t a 3 LH group parameters require repro of ε of and ( e t w en the of v Giv ould t determinan m a is t parameters, k w rogatt-Nielsen sector y structure ) dels ). ha Y uk not F 2 parameter d case. ε k normalised the Y 21 that ( these terms to gauge mo L wn Y (3.1 this do O masses dieren consisten to w y Handed angles this do the on y with b = w expansion ossibilit eq. b our H SM in sho the 31 p v to that ) en determinan elo hosen with expansion is, the del e Left u = ed c the b a . Y alid the w on a mixing expansion ( the giv j v ounds m the mo k w of b canonically structure the a tial R Y The and i tributions for and are a and er also k that uk structure ) describ CKM on w . m same that matrix ε the N results up Y j con eects oten a ( U(1) correction e are structure conclusion en    upp R t O b wing a to uk and 2 3 i>k the (t) X basis erp hical its N the = ultitude our ε Y ε giv the sectors. 1 in the ij + wing this allo of go m b d 32 in also ) Y ) sup some er, ij for w, u a t to 3 total to 2 requiring H ik Y 1 Y follo dieren (1) ers parameters masses ε ev form ( ε e ii hierarc L – elo R in the w form O w ( c a b o N N 5 the the e could een k p dels In 3 4 Just normalisation b , sectors, this ε Ho – symmetry obtain wn-quark this example ' ε ε in transformation w L the t arriv U j et mo dominan do e ]. k of ust b up-quark ted = the can for Y w H the i that    m parameters is [16 e mass. ultaneously Handed expansion alues. k sub of Using b d naturally N in v d w = t ∝ N m hical m handed explained dieren structure function sim e. ys c, presen k d j case only t the v a e u if Y R tial b, o realistic alues i v X (SM) ) As Y ) ˆ eigen with v t, b Righ s a 2 a, with alw the masses ε ab righ m m . = w ( ij angles, hierarc ed ε oten del t (1.1 results emerges t ts the Y O a ij is t cancellation expansion messenger i and most symmetries, d Y mass wn = y → 1 L t erp Mo the then eq. b Y ˆ momen no in do 13 ε the observ ) = the is all LH in matrices, u same sup consider t mixing H is ecien general dieren elian 6 Y angles discussed the to e ( and the ε corrections and co elds principle w tial M of the dieren u the as the is useful hical, seen for R er Y up o In most e Standard e ˆ of the four assuming w oten oth non-ab b b eaking and/or t in mixing ahler p b duce Y ) pap elds where the 1, y sp form, the hierarc ε the triangular t-handed) to K the L ( of replacemen matrix tributions is ˆ and zeros. O ma M and in terms of es this / a d repro from our H this consider, v = ahler 32 (righ con w Y The all As In > relate only K e a 23 Strictly the redening ) pro 1 elian w u uk y y Y Not masses structure ( and texture come With their Y < If from the not using parameters ab messenger presence could b the triangular b matrix angles. 3.2 It JHEP07(2005)049 t e is y is is of of in to in H In a an w the the the t t and R w term , ij only non- from i t. larger ound ahler this small of Y group q ε, ε. b N K sectors leading If leading the > matrices angles to tribution necessary argumen simple the same applies triangular is j come for quark the wn generation underlying transforms corrections the the conclusions q the than elemen y is R,d dening dierence gauge ik con generated er do b h dimension a breaking, the ) N obtained of wn ahler the presence requiremen ev w rst ij our sector . form the transforms here K SM a v ] that y is that in mixing the result do upp ecially and similar K whic parameter. larger or and uk [18 tribution the the sp ert higher matrices er A the and e Y the With the up saturates 1 trolled ahler the that a the b As ev is This to K 3 ref. t con . terest y as in ' (and urthermore CKM w in . elds b ). . of necessarily ed prop con the in implies F implies in from ) symmetry 2 v the only 2 ij matrices separately second Ho is M y of R,d triangular ( due ii in expansion of / ). transform This new h ( a N y in and but pro term dier a O N ( elemen tries w cannot is O > a ε the tal i en o L in one the w e symmetry can and v ). allo = a the rise where w easy i implicitly sho the t that the giv true M up that where of violates e uk / relativ is up apply sector that with a v same y i it transformations family rst SU(2) transformations it the dels non-ab ε ha the relativ under the should del N expansion to family with ) the matrix not relate e giving as LH the to under at of Giv w mo of j < w to and the mo symmetry in k Notice one fact . teed hical for the do of the after (3.1 this es Y generation ahler ) that not the y singlet, e to ε, In ij smallness K case M (e.g. dominan v This Here true e a olv an ariance Y eq. 3 2 elian es erator o v v v one ab due ./ from underlying rescaling and guaran smaller terms parameter in do not the form. the are ha taking third in in applies sector correction under the op family trivially to from sub term, as of hierarc ab JHEP07(2005)049 . . 2 e e e k a y it w of of ij to b w for w see the the oth the Y (1) and LH LH > y t that ). elo than b o 1 basis ahler same b ij 2 , i O tities. terest of b hange < 2 T Y or case with case matrix K c related smaller ( handed case in basis Y the j of preserv Y with transfor- k a died < the structure for t. O ond of Y Therefore, < least w in quan the strong i are j of the this t not dels left a ij are the k k sucien 1 . mo this not , smaller o Although Y the at in Y k 3 d ts N uk of es In masses e mo least t to to Y et in is es ). Y conclusion c, the b symmetry < 6= y departure do corresp basis erform ). j ysical in is j at b, do i or k er t true p matrix from k for t-handed . need that textures i (neglecting for Y (3.2 the y the the ph j a, Y ev the inconsisten 23 is aect elemen not (3.1 k b i oth e eects for w Y ould of Y could in b of if basis to of w can inconsistency righ is i eq. on is to to ected j w ) k case, i.e. if e t eq. e hical Ho ts e ahler all j ) the N an same w in the K exp in this that that (3.1 rescaling sub-dominan y ik this ahler instance, conclude This to and arriv b (3.1 er small as the K eects N that er e e ys for in and w k . elemen eq. hierarc o or through a elemen hical e fact o en w ev suppressed mixing, sensitiv F so y condition ound k eq. ossible. v er p a to ahler > of i a w the terms e b en p transformations is that in w alw again giv i the conclusion arriv K ha w ev hical > the b er is in the a t Ho t is w canonical e i giv the j ed of t handed the ahler zeros j determining uk for hierarc for k w are are to form eak k ij a the only this Ho to Y still K Y ould terms. this t w Y for ij same could w e to hec left hierarc t. Y to t the for of ij c > and 2) elemen due also w e the and order – , Y ahler the when j < w a triangular exactly the ) is after t) calculating k 7 k texture (3 K us j satised. w they also = elemen Y are k a – i the er Clearly form ts in > j k Y a discussed, elemen saturating Th is (3.1 easily and sub-dominan k canonical . with uk i form w e not and N This 4 e Y . more y a Y 1) when v upp presen b canonical exception ik ys structure , (1) is en eq. 1) tit the ecause generating a for corrections uk if or ha hange N , en O (3 j elemen b ev c Y , that e k an 1 of k ij canonical exactly the can , transformations (3 additional t k + alw Y with y 3 w of basis Y giv tial iden structures zeros is us < the matrices so The Y It ij triangular condition the to not to > a y an is a , < . 1), Cholesky Y on the As k symmetry i are m , Th k ceed w er the an j oten es to to masses a k > ounds the ahler are calculate (2 . > < ts. Y and b t the do for j ij There K i without pro uk erp w k upp i order. use Y . h with Y ij Y and i elemen whic ij t en Y v t are j 0 phenomenological k d t en er will k Y e j the can use if Y correction corrections Y orry the k leading ha 2) Y v the to e = structure with , metric , the w e t transformation Y of transformation canonical i. Giv w mixings e e the = constrained i brok t upp ha at L w t k from (3 v w freedom with e of accoun Y N canonical and the ha from and the these w j are rotation in hical additional this need able ahler ) w, that y i and enien to leading and migh Clearly for the using v b K consider er in corrections far angles correction No ε basis e 1) with statemen w No (3.1 that , and , v the tial o j con started what ould ε small note taneously e Using So One diagonal. p hierarc observ k (2 rst e ha w tributions v a the is eq. = v on e ahler ahler e e aking > oten y w ha the It pro Therefore, mation. T corrections and W analysis the ( the induced 3.2.1 sp ”standard” i initial sector elds. here, p K b necessarily con w that to the mixing K original this the in JHEP07(2005)049 e e e a h ). is ts of at es to en b b ts. 3 for w try the ted the our one The y or only suc v lled ij giv Ev zeros ahler ahler en order ysical lling of Y to can ) K K cannot of mixing ximate a er matrix, only lled ph 21 < only elemen the elemen The a presen e Y tribute or j mass section (3.1 t the zero , nev matrices the 3 to w b this k i can to a a holomorphic appro 12 Y elds is osition texture Y origin con ossible. in. e er Y lepton eq. p non-zero uk p ( transformation next can 11 and on mass an Y ev y a ) of Y or the corrections. the the they 4 w carrying holomorphicit dieren a y corrections only 32 analysis ] an the texture tribute to b still ( the of lled in eigenstates. of Y e relativ textures, the Ho 20 in O e zeros triangular so-called the that the textures, eect In , con w that form ts the will b fermionic of giv these are rise this a at after er zero ahler t lled of y it to 3 [19 y mass w hical eld(s) i zero kno a K the of b the a use the used. Y only these will clear ts ma upp example to on uk e ecien of due in lled lled only and is to it v the implies leading b giving Y of that e e that suppressed co An is it matrices. hierarc a a b b smaller zero . eects texture (1) is wn terms ts hence curren a (1) see 21 our not of this through aected needs is (1) that a O order harge Y w determinan O hoice can c angles a has of e e O sho ecause, c only v b or can e and b < can try uk wn one case the immediately ysical the e 2 ha Y elemen 12 ) through the en texture is our w can that neutral zeros section, alue on Y ph Although R not sho j ( separately the v v is d theories . eld – 6= can = 22 L mixing dify can e i in the the subleading from c, negativ Y v a 8 e hical e the N structure for ossible (1) 22 will more on next corrections the If b, mo w – these w hange p ha matrix ts Y v O c able elian in zero net matrix a, a and e is er example a hanging a the these a w to w c ab hical with a that, analysed of a order. 31 Once hierarc breaking than or y alue. though that w nev Y e is in a v F w, a the en uk ed ]. case b observ texture . w our for Y 13 ) w then en case one uk [5 therefore v do therefore constrain of 2 conjugated sho Y t form, terested can Y hierarc ev ust corrections a brok ( the larger y sho in necessarily e the w ecial m a hical measureables and implies O the same can e and zeros and w of is is the w hical basis the no sp for to when w t symmetry t it e) subleading 32 t h measured order only ahler the harged (1) Y oil of try c least at that K all will O this ysical sp hierarc the true insertions In same or en the demonstrated whic triangular e are ccurs at hierarc enien a try = taneously ph accoun therefore the o v t. tribute section w sub-dominan texture e the y negativ 23 33 en can the R on In b 23 clear also tities Y the w case to Y y y the with the basis. with ) con con h As N b sp and holomorphic are in is In if is that If matrix, tial, in a in i (sa measuremen whether in subleading This ). in eac a in elemen it this quan ). (3.1 w ]. 3 5 explicitly non w only this that using oten ose previous at ( a j of situation simple. ( In zero and sho is [21 is aking eq. efore, ensated conict O matrix ho O harge uk a T b zero. angle. 4 erp ]. lled except c case, c other us, ccurs the in canonical as Y to a Additional that . in o [5 at and e tial through at y alue ecial w tities of e e t, b Th In As v 11 sup a k ossible v determine can ecially comp wn v an this the Y sp the o p e uk o > oin e oten 11 y is of in T violation done sho Y measureable angle corrections mixing lled texture pro most b quan Finally 3.2.2 in A Y the i zeros zeros matrix p can sign to esp ab w b the p JHEP07(2005)049 . t e ). er of at or 3) v 23 2 ( er- ect see , the the F and Y p O ha (4.2) (4.1) com- o ahler (2 upp a of to + exp e T in ( K rank hanged w t w e smallest ik c is, a O N angles the t. Therefore w tribute t h usual more uk the left-handed at of = )) masses. Y the determining ). not term )) Y 2 2 con 2 (1) e sub-dominan ε ik tly ε the with of whic ( elemen v in O ( e the are (1) N t alue the O b canonical ik O t y ha can ) ( hange v of O corrections of use c mixing sligh e N hanged O + an + R c 23 w . will an (3.1 form is that + e canonical (1 ) the sub-dominan N (1 eigen still b 1 u ˆ u 23 Y 12 and 33 that to eq. ( handed ˆ e the Y ˆ alue. alue Y dominan cannot (1). fact b v v test corrections, case with can of w determinan h of only O left has corrections e sub matrices e through ))Det the ligh )) )) w still kno try b alues to the eigen eigen 2 2 this can whic tries angles. v e case ε ε ahler t e en normalisations ( ( necessarily normalisation ) oilt b the w ( en K ahler In and e d O O 32 3) this sp O ) K , a Y could alues The are + + ( will Hence, is the to v w the t + eigen sector, (2 , ) a t from t (3.1 triangular the (1 (1 d ) mixing necessarily (1 23 transformations Y us d d uk in 33 23 d the of e, Y generation 12 normalisation ˆ ˆ that Y eigen Y Y ( ' th corrections – v canonical eq. Y in angle. hange o ( ) in masses are the 9 ultiplicativ c and = use ˆ handed in Y t ab rst y m – test transformations matrix t t ), ( to ) structure order and matrices. ) ) obtained alue d cancellations. an 22 u u v to the en a 23 33 left Y ligh the the (3.1 function Y Y handed ( w mixing under )Det function ( ( o tal a giv e canonical their hical ) e v N that w the mass masses structure = lead for 13 angles 2 eigen with v t ( a eq. uk demonstrate left a after structure t t Y w d 12 in the ) ) w , basically of to Det the y d d ) the corrections 33 23 ( true they the hical a acciden hierarc again is the viest the Y Y the )) = of O are w ( ( is hanging 2 hical mixing angles, lepton hical ) to (3.2 c ε for t hea of discussion need ( the = that at those alue ahler Y only e O this v ( duct eq. w u 23 and K not obtain w the same the tities. barring + tical In e e, hierarc hierarc matrices only pro of Det mixing when v non-hierac kno w than (1 the eigen harged a still the e a (1) c is ha d 23 23 using iden quan corrections w us pro wing are the the w ˆ structure the O a e of masses consider th is w e w tities. = = uk , this our b follo corrections while and Y No means that w second ahler smaller particular, from 23 ysical hical case and to corrected to expansion. K no matrix aect therefore quan In ph e ) the is matrices this er, are case, the e, hical R v alues, the v to ahler can v explicitly N Quark and In Concerning implies hierarc discussion mass ( ha K complete wn this and ysical (1) ahler ahler. e o ) the exception plicated, In Since this ε hierarc T O the ph 4.1 triangular. sho 4. that Moreo K matrix this K Finally submatrix in Det eigen the turbativ w JHEP07(2005)049 , t t e e d 1 w In b o , w (1) the the the the can last . this L with ˜ tries (4.3) hical righ righ O diag- K ahler kno ˆ eect e 33 V Then, to as so L en f t K mixing w e K of this, dify in V ˆ that lopsided could w M t-handed the This the 1 )). of mo and understo and see hierarc eigenstates. 2 equal and er, order ahler. ε ˜ righ e already o basis K with ( ts where ahler dieren ev K b f 22 T from e means O w K ˆ v only duct K M canonical rotation of neglect mass ! this the † + , masses. L dels same 2 ha Ho can masses | o-diagonal ˆ pro V to 23 of strongly e in . (1 33 ecien This 23 theory ould 2 ) ximately mo ) w of )) K 12 1 is ε the co 1 w 2 a ˆ safely the handed L f ε t-handed )). 12 in = ( handed ˜ t of V ˆ 2 ) e ˜ in = K correction negligible. ahler M K correct (1) b 1 f ε t ( t-handed fermion O existence b U(1) eects appro ( e 1 ( can e, | ˆ K righ u situation 12 O where b M v + righ O ˜ of /m e † tries in K ˜ R the , righ s righ e, K The ( are the t the ˆ w ha will Only V (1 + 2 f en b smallness 1 therefore m this 22 f of e t still ˆ H d 12 ) usually m d 12 M these basis ˆ (1 on ˆ e. w 1 the trivial 1 M out transformation 2 H to quark v (1) is K handed the ratios ε will then o m and = obtain on R = ˜ O Still ab ed t the K y y non ˆ basis ould V that ( wn ab the b b eects. )) structure then f seen to 12 w ). t matrix 2 in and ˆ 2 ) do equal has trol righ of ε e ), M 2 2 the ε t orry ( d and v † – 2 32 ij ( oth L mixings. matrix precisely to and w m ε mixings this matrix O ˆ Y in b V con ( O )) the ha ( these the and 10 2 t ulated reabsorb a implies + ' O e ) angles ε = eect texture w – ( no this end d ahler w † 23 are nd a diagonalising elemen 12 ones ij out a at O )(1 ˜ K ˆ Y ahler ˜ from Y b this ximately form e and ( w uk d hermitean should hical handed d 1 the when dep 22 As 32 ab K has + handed a e w Y 23 e ˆ e Y R Y . /m , ˆ w V s uk f mixing d only (1 w K 23 the left and f the ˆ d left Y ˆ 3 suppressed that appro ˆ Y dels 12 mak matrix m i Y immediately M orry ˆ the ts ˆ ) 1 of Y M in arises handed hierarc )) 33 of k matrix, w e 1 diagonal † is ) = 2 L rule to mo angle the the 1 are a ˆ ε V d the ˜ † and it 22 ( Usually K to ˜ hec to diagonalising w left K ˆ ˆ not f Y of c Y handed symmetry erse rule a ˜ ( O on = arriv ( really K the 23 † ˆ v 3 R ecien ( corrected is M ts e ts. uk to main + ect 2 3 and ˆ that in is N Y m = e co to These w i Y need left non-canonical enough R this m b (1 U(1) d 12 angles m trivial elds oth 2 N u ]. 12 the the see resp wn ε to easy b ˆ tributions not Y the the ' of elemen ecien total [22 the also to is to sector, 3 as = diagonalisation i transformation for in written co con do t ˜ it 3 † with ) usually er, the the ) , e e unkno eigenstates mixing can d t from correction handed limit 22 2 v written the is ev w (1) of er, in Y diagonalising Y t denominator e order ( w ( v trivial ha same ahler O t these the v exception the ts the ahler the textures e K handed mass Y is Ho these righ ha that K w the exception a t oth the wn alues e = it b v redenition. w then case The Moreo t matrix w a the consider tribution trol an the w leading righ ecien H e uk of handed as unkno handed denominator this con co Y in con that doing of angles. therefore means where eld onalised suppression and consider for eigen the w i.e. No where JHEP07(2005)049 . e e o h is w b w As w (1) the the the t uc and ulae with (4.4) U(1) O order m t of if in ij seesa tries ) still handed mixings w nd L neutrino case, ts form situation therefore t-handed en the t L y M N the some b ( left . kno harges. N o-diagonal transforma- and can c righ this this leading and in T that migh en e only the these and not ecien is the w structure compatible In at ˆ y Y giv 1 co of ]. small b see exactly standard do this through T R is masses ' symmetries elds where e fact Since neutrinos, [25 This N (1) . ii o w cases under 1 in the ) . y only 2 In O with w i symmetry situation L ) t t hanges ) ]. case . c cancel elian elds y N small, e T R use predicted ( hniques. the case, j [14 Y our tit N energy ts. this h.c. order sin neutrino sector. the ( v neutrinos tec matrix v these w + 1 the ( a dieren immediately with this to dify iden j lo and non-ab R the date and and maximalit form nd handed c R T e in een M generate k of ecien t mo mass the quark to transformed Y w the can Although 1 ij but tical in handed Y the similar co > can to hange is to et 1 R again e from all c ) i righ to b immediately the e . w case R M ) left iden eectiv i has or L ecause W R transformations N triangular for in R F order with ( e b not these N – and onds can order. v M the R neutrino angle er the ij close explored ( the ossible ]. 1 2 ossible e of Y e N couplings ha ˆ 11 p do matrices, p mixing w In of size. Y for ecial [24 a – < matrix, upp a T ery is is L j higher ˆ w Y v j coupling e w sp = alue c a a R N corresp k structure mixings a it it b handed t-handed v 2 e mixing T at L angles Y w analysed elds ) large Ref. Then uk eectiv = b a theories ij uk to N e order. also Y . e Y matrix Y matrix L righ similar in left i the b 2 uk L v This sub-leading t = case, and ε the is N case, L Y can sin solar our N ha of matrix corrections T v v neutrino T at the ) of oth hanged ( t can mass handed mass e c b mixing a this the ose this ws ˆ hical Y = will order left-handed leptonic Y predict and ro ho sector of mass In 1 ( metric for in these lepton c left canonical compiled 1 erties = only at L R o mixings. and elian o ˆ the hanged ) not jorana w jorana eectiv M masses dify t c w t can R the hierarc the sub-dominan are t M of metric tries. ahler es ahler prop e e e and e Ma Ma mo M died ˆ most the v Y if b y of K K in w ( Y at en e do e t are h neutrino neutrino non-ab mixings T ha ]. L at dierence mo ts e masses can ws e Therefore, ahler N Y the that and Y [23 the only neutrino Y K ro The 1 the arises masses are = = Y er eectiv eectiv see hierarc hanged of transformations 2 t or and c elemen situations: ts e dels will for ev the realistic canonical hanged Therefore angles neutrino c t t w case oth w symmetry the t hical the the b in mo Y Y o-diagonal to hanged. case transformation an Neutrino Case Ho In c only hanism. are the 1. 2. neutrino out ecien tries. result (1) e relev in a mixings not mec dieren The obtain hierarc giving mixing form 4.2 The for co O family Then dieren are en tions Y Hence, canonical ab JHEP07(2005)049 t y is of on are the the the will soft and erse vit duct with es same v other under to K indeed on cannot masses in curren natural of and pro the m ativ breaking ergra tributing the masses ∂ eld ahler K plus the due to y and the K m ers the 2 b con or y sup ∂ on / t w soft deriv 2 ], itself neutral b 2 3 soft v ending / o ts m in neutral 1 . e K phenomenology p F that sfermion m [27 a K n b n the ∂ dep the F in a K to in transformations vy the in m n D-term on ounded ust dieren b ∂ is tribution matrix to t F ecien that d canonical b . m masses e hea for wn e K co canonical Notice hanging e of b our con of it c N v end n K b larger ahler v this n ∂ smaller n . for sho d ha K (1) F ∂ F-terms. presen a c ortional e ) non of can dep our ) F-term 1 O new b will eld 1 v As obtain, basis K the tribution a breaking . terms e also n a ers (1) the prop ultiply K K the ∂ w dangerous ( w but can e of ( ) O the realised m con o terms i 1 no , w K soft in ac symmetry sector p e initially y it anishing anishing D to fact to m b v h l K anishing to ∂ tit K f e in obtain angles b this Then m ( v In a that ∂ . e eects These symmetry case, can K factors 2 non K non-v ha tribution w iden dangerous is terms / ]. – U(1) m b K hidden non-v 1 e extremely it a q ∂ t n ab a the elds w to er, our con ∂ g [26 is dierence although 12 this our. of v the the K K t with v the is oin m ev case y mixing , – 2 y = n i on ∂ tributions structure p with a w In K rise ∂ a ˆ m tial this D n t t h † e m ersal CNCs) ) 2 ∂ m ]. Ho ) con from than this ∂ / masses and transformation on the 2 the elds ab 2 F to m 3 eects. [8 (F / t eld giv † under . oten dieren ∂ 1 ˆ ) F-term tial. m ossibilit m In m univ ossibilit p to y ortan 2 b ( ts K p of the / F p end a m 1 the is Due K the commen ma e ( F of CNC oten ect under F-term e imp † ers p h dep F v the this matrix dieren K masses = of ab ahler to dels. breaking ( N w curren therefore eld mak that e 2 ha ers eld o the K K resp e K anishing b b 2 p itself. The mo e will e m whic new / is soft lik 1 1 2 3 w , on w the and 2 2 in scalar K the y um v applies. that / / to m K with n will harges 2 3 2 3 structure our non-v consider of c a in neutral v to 2 = Although also zero. m m of / the that original breaking a to still rise 1 when masses a tial e ab 2 the = tum the ot larger are e b principle of with ˆ Notice es ossibilit m v 2 see canonical K the ro ould harge o as p also in oten c ]. on m e w giv symmetry K for e related elian p quan ab as hanging h masses. w than v eld the m c e SUSY [19 it terms ab ∂ w the F breaking ha † our are, same ) , in square b the v soft e whic 2 our ahler q / v for sometimes 1 Soft If W Another diagonalised a closely er K soft endence cesses the obtain some the the a w o o e haracteristics K terms the dep with therefore Therefore 4.3 generate pro p Finally T conclusion of the not can b are the to masses ( non-trivial generated of size in c masses, JHEP07(2005)049 a a is t- a. of ts in d- to w w are the the the w a ma- a sup- a class ahler mo order basis. ysical trian- trans- to uk uk with matrix K uk basis. Y Y of through rotation ph 2 Y straigh ecien basis eects fermionic canonical canonical mass our the where large a discusions. corrections co to partial of of of to mass case noncanonical the leading ahler corrections ws the quark (1) case, quark the K onding t enormously basis canonical onding at O transformations. in the SCKM in canonical the useful exceptions transformation obtained allo basis transformation up breaking wn factor in eects this the in wn wledges that ignore for the the do a the sfermion the tributions that in ahler to that corresp corresp soft some the SCKM ahler y kno to dominan K to to b that, second K also con canonical the simplies ac the unkno structure the the go the means sub that, ed the corrections the e v corrections transformations the scalar can and in couplings the w their only O.V. of y conclude e Romanino that to this pro compare only b obtain the w discussed handed the formalism e from masses. some ork e tial dels v 2 W dels and w implies diagonalising to to First can are suppressed (1), left ha (1), also mo transformation equal e eects diagonalise to oten lled mo O ts. at e diagonalising O Andrea e ys w t e transformations e simple where v a w This transformations or the w erp b the the ts a are w, matrices, lling ha breaking – U(1) leptons discussions. and alw these the rotation in a e transformed the enien sup No ed ecien in can 13 w transformations v in Therefore, W with a corrections soft zero of co are – and rotation smaller ecien second matrix. con elop uk matrices metric from that corrections when instance, helpful the Y co a order formalism the (1) that ys a ahler is trasformations. zeros handed ahler w a dev ereld. O and w K or o a obtained ahler in in it for K see a angles. eects e F the w quarks texture K this ahler only that v alw t handed uk seen left sup uk diagonal. wn to obtain A2002-00612 K of e Y e ha Y hanged the v e leading for do is wn ahler are FP this e Kane texture left full the w eects ha K the the to easy unc Using mixing W matrices sho of terested e unkno the G. receiv as matrix. necessary e hical canonical is the in the of in w v corrections a that canonical it of matrix and CNC of studied the also ha w ts structure the MCYT tially textures here a F ts a e not e e to the order thank eects than v although case, ts of v angles. angles a w w uk hierarc a canonical analysis. y w First Y basis ha to ha hical are a essen triangular hange uk e elemen e an these masses to e c than e that Y elemen uk parameter same rotation spanish ysical basis the w W the lik w transformations Y are In our a smaller mixing mixing ph basis. if to able the considered hierarc only the seen equal the ould a calculation of wledgmen ahler letter completely analyse e and and and the with basis with onding w died. diagonal v or SCKM can K dels on o ossible. of efore, from observ ard T transformations ha expansion SCKM mo p b Conclusions kno with this odiagonal mo the the e ahler ahler ahler to ort K corresp in matrix formations the gular diagonalising p Ac L.V.S. usually If to matrix K As larger 5. In the K basis masses transformation forw trices masses of W els the case are are phenomenological JHEP07(2005)049 t ts of of the ett. in B ev. ork- avity L ]. elian oin 3985 and R w (1994) gr p obtain ab ] ett. er L 580 eects eects to 29 420 agreemen the Phys. , in sup Phys. B oken (1995) , relating transforma- aryon- in , B b the in avor published in the br in [28 Phys. , 75 avor ett. ons ula , and GUT L squark ]. with es hniques these that ctr Phys. ett. ously of ]; agree L ]; U(2) form hep-ph/9509410 ele tec symmetry w masses masses [ groups dels analyse angles matrices Phys. SUSY that o ev. matric , symmetries e sho o Nucl. mo w with R into 255 ontane alar oblem ersymmetric t in , w exact sp sc pr nd hical avour sup a -term fermion quel e out an ories ukawa They Cabibb Phys. the se avour w ]; Soft of Y (1996) muons the , ab conclusions om the masses 2001. hep-ph/0305270 U(2) ]; ]. [ the t fr , of d the and hierarc a vide matrices. addition mathematical ]; for hep-ph/9512388 and and dels hep-ph/9606383 369 [ elian [ es b Our ggatt-Nielsen of ations and masses, In pro o om Mo A B learn 76 r 85 article dels: Jersey , fr Unie F es e matrices. 053002 mass y sp o w mo case matric ett. gener v simpler L – quark Ross, New matrices Sa and basis. (1996) textur . (1996) the symmetries the of symmetries authors ork, 14 ysical hep-ph/9304299 (2004) hniques. ansformation [ dictions r w of e – ukawa hep-ph/9504292 277 in matrix normalisation tic, hep-ph/9610449 G.G. [ Phys. T ph [ 377 sfermion C.A. tec 481 Y chy 69 mass t the Romanino, , Pr hep-ph/9507462 , ahler 3 al [ article t ukawa ar 45 y ersymmetric B 4269 this B Flavor ], p D ]; K 3 o Y the A. erg, see: the Scien somewhat and v Mass b of (1979) ometry [28 Sup Hall, Hier ett. the ev. to of Sa ]. Horizontal L ge ein and R (1997) orld Phys. erg, of (1995) uses (1993) Canonic dominan orski Wild, W dieren y symmetry ref. A 147 sfermion (1996) Kagan, L.J. W e h ]. ok C.A. S. R. 48 B 493 Seib In sub P A. 356 Phys. Rab references Phys. canonical the Nielsen, Nucl. 466 ed., and , ama, D with , B eddie, S. whic , N. gauge S. B and matrices pictur y and and in structure are ]. P Thormeier, B completion and ommasini, ali d the X Phys. ev. T hep-ph/9609342 dels ories H.B. [ ett. erlap. and R M. Dv . jean, further ]; lines the v L Hall, orski Phys. Mura to D. Rosner the mo o MNS Kabir Jones U(1) hep-ph/0312237 Phys. Leigh violation ok [ I.N.R. and Unie 527 287 Nir . Nucl. H. and Gro analysis P and P During G.R. L.J. , and er Phys. t J.L. 83 Y. and same Phys. Nucl. hep-ph/0309165 C. S. , and hange [ , , R.G. and c Nucl. erg, D.R.T. , (1959) (1998) acy b 72 analysis roggatt the normalisation 2000 normalisation review Dreiner k, F 3 presen horizontal hep-ph/9310320 King not (2004) omarol Hall ein CKM [ a Leurer, Dine, ersymmetric ersymmetric F P Barbieri, Barbieri, Dudas, Dudas, Berezhiani, 417 the Jac added. gener oblem ASI ett. do or e” the hep-ph/9508296 with symmetry 468 T L 586 (2004) lepton-numb CP-violation A. sup R. [ de pr L.J. Z. B E. R. sup symmetry E. H.K. M. F I. M. G. S.F. C.D. transformation along [5] [6] [4] [2] [8] [9] [3] [7] [1] “naiv Note ing where canonical canonical with the tions References JHEP07(2005)049 a , 321 ]. CP , ]. Phys. and family om , Phys. 39 B fr (2001) Part. , (1998) and Phys. del 020 D , in fermion (1996) 64 elian an mo es symmetry 015013 in: 337 a fermions 528 fcnc ev. Nucl. D 035007 CP-violating angles R ak of 477 B of (2004) with and in neutrinos ev. ev. symmetries B non-ab matric owe family R R d (2003) test (1993) es 03 hep-ph/9601243 ctr Phys. (2002) instance [ hep-ph/0307190 Phys. endent mixing [ and , alars 67 nn. ele CP-violation mass gauge 309 Phys. sc analysis 66 for A system ]. textur 353 Phys. SU(3) D d cision , dels JHEP and 239 ; ge B , e D , Nucl. om mo lar ev. , Pr fr with om used Nucl. quark kaon right-hande ]. R ett. fr ev. 1039 , ukawa L (1996) R avour-dep omplete standar dels in on (2003) Y are and masses c masses del ]; eriments avity ories with to CP-violation mo angles A gr the invariant Phys. 477 mo exp angles the (1985) 574 , Phys. er g Phys. d in ach B , ous , o B mixing GUT d 55 for sup hep-ph/0401064 ermion es [ neutrino violation F Ramond, mixing elasco-Sevilla, estrini, ate? in estrictions . d ett. jarlsko appr ]; mixing ]; V r 50 ett. P e P Phys. L CP-violation standar ontane – L a C evisite hep-ph/0104088 Silv and SUSY [ L. r matric Sp ersymmetric gener CP and 15 of ersymmetry the ev. L. and Neutrino in CP-violation ]; ]. de and hep-ph/0205111 – R es, [ sup Nucl. 358 invariants Phys. ) (2004) and of e sup , s Moroi, , in b . mass ( text and in Invariant Viv masses in ]. ama, esaw-induc T. 692 y masses vignac CP-violation Ross K con Gronau, Phys. g-like es, se O. alignment CP ation , genesis (2001) 075013 , B La quark → and ky M. physics Viv hep-ph/0108112 the squarks hep-ph/9411288 [ Mura S. [ and symmetry epto with Masiero ermion G.G. extensions 615 , the unic L /D in F O. ermion Jarlsko H. squark and Phys. B F A. 243 B (2003) invariants New del of oximate ]; a, 3870 hep-ph/0007328 hep-ph/9403338 elian [ [ and in and ; Komine Should Kostelec mo es, 67 and SUSY Ross, ab hep-ph/0407349 Silv CP-violation S. ot Nucl. ]. Appr , Ross, Kitano, . Binetruy Quark 366 243 100 Phys. D hep-ph/0104027 al (5) Viv , [ (2001) Branco erg, . o, Romanino, V.A. (1995) ]; ]. ]; ]; ]. P R. J.P Neb G.G. Gabrielli, SU ev. O. Nir, elasco-Sevilla 161 G.G. Raz, R A. Seib Kiy 520 V gener 51 Masiero Nucl. MSSM symmetry G.C. E. and SUSY M. Y. (2000) (1986) (1994) CP-violating and Commutator and , and transformations ; B and L. in G. N. maximal Y. e D horizontal A. in and CP-violation the eu, erts, og, of Phys. and ˜ hep-ph/0104263 nez 493 169 332 (2001) ev. [ ett. example: in and and 2075 a , e edev, family R L basis aints al ama, textur Ross, vidson Rob Branco B B B Ib King Botella Botella, 51 for hep-ph/9801411 ersymmetric Ey Leb Chang, Ak Nir Masiero Nir [ Moroi, Jarlsk Gabbiani, asur Da Bernab eak ett. ett. ett. onstr hep-ph/9304307 hep-ph/0206064 hep-ph/0209023 hep-ph/9604387 hep-ph/0312007 095012 physics sup D. L N. me Sci. Phys. J. C. L Y. c [ [ S. G.C. [ 21 (1989) O. F.J. A. [ [ anomalous L phases symmetry mass SU(3) Phys. T. W F. Y. F.J. G. L.E. G.G. See R.G. S.F. [20] [11] [19] [10] [12] [18] [16] [15] [17] [13] [14] JHEP07(2005)049 d , and ]; for e alar , d (5) mns 2442 e sc b of angle (1999) lepton chy SU 1 fermion ipp of CP ]; ar = 59 avor ontier and U(1) 011 angle make alistic the the fr (1996) ation e and N the D r hier SUSY mixing an SUSY ]. of in dominanc ersymmetry and c a attern to right-hande 53 ]. by with in moment, GUT p new ev. e ge in lepton d (2002) unic sup in R mixing a D ]; e mass ar via mixing ]; hep-ph/0105005 L of [ 09 ge and GUT ev. ]; and physics e SUSY R lar neutrino induc avour → Phys. ob Gr physics 109 neutrinos violation , d magnetic asymmetry dominanc hep-ph/0306076 pr [ ]. the ]; JHEP es, neutrino ontributions ]; SUSY and violation avor lations neutrino ansitions: c , ]. Phys. ]; aking CP lation, e ]. al and tr e in hep-ph/0307191 , avor Viv of [ (2001) CP hep-ph/0002168 br S avour [ d and oscil ortant the del gino e 095004 O. oscil neutrinos hep-ph/0212397 neutrino ]; natur → [ the ]; to 518 tmospheric view esses right-hande hep-ph/0104146 mo imp d anomalous 039 d [ c B A ]; o d hep-ph/9904210 Char and 071801 moment on B induc [ dominanc lepton an ]; mixing pr with Constructing epton-avor (2003) . 57 neutrino ation L ]; as single ett. 075016 ge Muon and Neutrino hep-ph/9912492 (2000) hep-ph/0212180 ent L 68 [ 215 aints [ 095001 ersymmetry hep-ph/0211283 dels [ hi, Pierce, estrini, standar hep-ph/9812475 (2004) Khalil, – empati hep-ph/0212023 [ om [ hep-ph/0304130 06 D [ bilar 85 unic right-hande V mo sup ura, right-hande fr neutrino curr A. ura, neutrino magnetic S. ontributions Silv (1999) esaw 16 92 365 onstr c d (2003) d Phys. 388 al ev. in – (c Se the the (1983) 331 (2001) L. and , 094024 hep-ph/0209303 R hep-ph/0002141 S.K. [ and amaguc and [ ett. 67 562 gr Okum JHEP of single 055009 Y (2000) Okum L es, hep-ph/0303071 atmospheric 64 unie , [ asymmetries neutr 126 and with D (2003) B hep-ph/0304239 189 Neutrino [ (1999) ama in M. D neutrinos Viv om ev. elation Phys. (2003) ersymmetric masses y B K.I. K.-i. (2004) 576 and hep-ph/0211228 r Huitu 183 fr CP R anomalous [ ev. , estrini, 051701 dels simple 661 O. (2003) ) ev. R right-hande nalysis sup B ay link and 451 s 69 K. ersymmetric Phys. Liao, R ett. c A 673 ( A and and solar mo B Silv (2003) e Mura L in neutrinos 67 Masiero 141803 B Solar GUT de Sleptonarium D changing and sup Phys. B Muon with W. ob , (2003) L. K ) ]; H. , 113010 y D Phys. (2001) ada ada A. T neutrino s and Phys. 649 o Nucl. ( ev. , ett. Phys. On → ura, neutrinos v eldon, Phys. , solar L R Phys. , of Ok Ok and dels K. 63 ev. 565 B eruglio, avor (2003) , W Sa Phys. K King, Gabrielli, /d F R CNCs empati ches ac ouplings Li Y. Y. mo B D Nucl. del (2003) Nom c B Shimizu, ]; ]. F ranco, V Kou, → ar 90 Larson, E. , F. genesis-MNS Masiero, F Nucl. and Phys. ories ersymmetric Phys. , se mo S.F. , C.A. H.A. D. Y. Phys. ev. B 67 y ett. , , E. al., Nucl. Moroi, T.J. E. A. neutrino Phys. d R L ett. tmospheric the symmetry , S.K. epto sup e and es Goto, Goto, e-saw in ert L D D.T. et d L A ), ukawa T. lepton v and and se and and and s del atmospheric and ange in Y T. T. ( Nucl. SUSY hep-ph/9810479 hini, hini, ev. ev. Pseudo-Dir [ in avity symmetry str masses) mo Phys. violation Phys. R and R Huang, matric ct family K , Kane and gr , Soni King, King, e Ciuc Ciuc er Altarelli Chakra Masiero, Nir, Harnik, Blazek ay Khalil Baek, Baek, Hisano Hisano Hisano, → Masina c auty e hep-ph/9510309 hep-ph/0204360 S. b R. Phys. M. B D. asymmetry indir G.L. M. quark neutrino J. [ 116005 violation I. S. lepton de J. GUT T. right-hande msw S. A. SO(10), C.-S. avor family string-inspir Phys. U(1) SU(5) matrix mass [ sup J. S.F. S.F. G. Y. S.K. [21] [24] [23] [22] [25] [26] JHEP07(2005)049 010 Phys. , (2004) avity 08 progress. gr in er sup JHEP ork , w in ators U(1), er e op e CP-violation ahler K and anomaly-fr and an – avour ]. and 17 e, – es symmetries textur structur Flavour ukawa ukawa hep-ph/0211279 Y [ Y es, Ibarra, Jones, A. Viv 095013 ]. O. and D.R.T. (2003) and 67 and Ross k D Espinosa Jac ev. hep-ph/0405095 R [ G.G. J.R. I. [27] [28] [29]