DOCSLIB.ORG

Nootka Sound Convention

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nootka Sound Convention Nootka sound convention Continue 1790-1794 Spanish-British settlement agreements for overlapping claims in Northwest America for other purposes, see Nootka (disguambiation). Nootka Sound ConventionsDateNootka Sound Convention: October 28, 1790 Nootka Claims Convention: February 12, 1793, Convention on Mutual Rejection of Nootka: 11 January 1794LocationMadrid, SpainAlso known asNootka Sound Convention, Nootka Claims Convention, Convention on Mutual Rejection of NootkaPartpantsSpain, UKOutcometainBritain and Spain were guaranteed the freedoms of the seas Nootka Convention Sound were a series of three agreements between the Kingdom of Spain and the Kingdom of Great Britain, signed in the 1790s that prevented a war between the two countries because of overlapping claims on parts of the Pacific northwest coast of North America. Spain's claims Spain's claims date back nearly 300 years to the papal bull of 1493, which, along with the following Treaty of Tordesillas, defined and defined the zone of Spanish rights exclusively to Portugal. In relation to other states, the agreement was legally ineffective (res inter alios acta). Spain interpreted it in the broadest sense of the word, revealing that it had granted them full sovereignty. Other European powers did not recognize Inter caetera, and even Spain and Portugal adhered to it only when it was useful and convenient. Britain's claims to the region were dated to sir Francis Drake's journey in 1579, as well as the right of pre-opening by Captain James Cook in 1778, although the Spaniards explored and claimed the region in 1774, under Juan Perez, and in 1775, under Bruno de Hecet and Bodege and Kvadra. The disputed sovereignty of the Nootka Sound dispute began in 1789 when Spain sent Jose Martinez to occupy Nootka Sound and establish exclusive Spanish sovereignty. In the summer of 1789, several fur merchant ships, British and American, arrived in Notka. Conflict over sovereignty arose between the captain of the British argonaut James Colnett and Martinez. By the end of the summer, Martinez had arrested Colnett, captured several British ships and arrested their crews. Colnett came to Nootka Sound, intending to build a permanent trading post and a colony on land previously acquired by his business partner John Meares. At the end of the summer, Martinez left Notka and took the captured ships and prisoners to San Blas, New Spain. News of these events provoked a confrontation between Spain and Great Britain, known as the Noutka Crisis, which almost led to war. The Nootka Convention of the 1790s, carried out in part by George Vancouver and his Spanish counterpart Juan Francisco de la Bodega y Kvadra, prevented the dispute from escalating to war. The first Convention was signed on October 28, 1790. and was deliberately vague. His preamble contained a statement, deferring in retrospective discussion of the rights and claims of both parties.... His first article stated that all the buildings and plots of land in Nootka Sound that had been seized by Martinez would be restored in the UK. To do this, Vancouver and Bodega and Kvadra were sent to Nootka Sound in 1792. However, no buildings were seized, and Bodega said that no land was purchased by the British, as the head of the Indigenous peoples of Makinna, as well as the American merchants Robert Gray and Joseph Ingram, who were present in 1789, say. Vancouver did not want to accept Bodega's various counter-proposals, and the whole issue was sent back to the British and Spanish governments. The first Nootka convention - the POV template is considered for merger. The neutrality of this article is disputed. The relevant discussion can be found on the conversation page. Please do not delete this message until the conditions are met. (December 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message template) The First Note Convention plays a role in the disputed sovereignty of the Falkland Islands between the United Kingdom and Argentina. Article VI stipulated that neither side would form new institutions on any of the islands adjacent to the eastern and western coasts of South America, which were then occupied by Spain. Both retained the right to land and to build temporary structures on the coasts and islands for fishing purposes. However, there was an additional secret article, which should remain in force until the subjects of any other Power on those shores were established. This secret article had the same power as if it had been included in the convention. The applicability of the Nott Convention to the Falklands Dispute is contentious and complex. The United River Plate did not participate in the convention. Thus, the convention defines it as another power and occupation of the settlement (in Port Louis) by the subjects of any other Power denied by Article VI, and allows the United Kingdom to reassert previous sovereignty and form new settlements. The Second Nootka Convention, known as the Nootka Claims Convention, was signed in February 1793 and awarded compensation to John Meares for the Spanish seizure of his ships in Nootka in 1789. The Third Nootka Convention Of the Third Nootka Convention, also known as the Convention on Mutual Rejection of Nootka, was signed on January 11, 1794. He called for a mutual rejection of Nootka Sound. Britain and Spain were free to use Nootka Sound as a port and build temporary structures, but neither ... must form any permanent institution in this port or claim any right of sovereignty or territorial domination there except And their said Majesties will be help each other to maintain for their subjects free access to the Port of Nootka against any other nation that may try to establish there any sovereignty or domination. Unresolved borders, although the Nootka crisis initially revolved around the question of sovereignty and the northern borders of New Spain, the main issues remained unresolved. Both sides have taken up positions against the border, with Britain wanting to establish it north of San Francisco and Spain in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. After Vancouver rejected the offer of The Bodega strait Juan de Fuca the border issue was again not addressed and instead left unspecified. The third convention addressed the issue of sovereignty only for the port of Notoka Sound itself. The United States maintains that at the time of the first Nota Convention, the United States had no claims in this area. U.S. claims in the region began with Robert Gray's expedition along the Columbia River. They were fortified and expanded by the Lewis and Clark expedition and the creation of Fort Astoria by the Pacific Fur Company. Spain's claims to the Pacific Northwest were acquired by the United States as a result of the signing of the Adams-Ona Treaty in 1819. The United States claimed that it had acquired the right of exclusive sovereignty from Spain. This position led to a dispute with the UK, known as the Border Dispute in Oregon. This dispute was not resolved until the signing of the Treaty of Oregon in 1846, which divided the disputed territory and established what later became the international border between Canada and the United States. Although the Nootka Convention theoretically revealed the Pacific northwest coast from northern California to Alaska to British colonization, the onset of the Napoleonic Wars diverted any effort to do so (as Vancouver recommended at the time) and the proposed colony-settlement in the region had to be abandoned. The Hudson's Bay Company, a remaining British presence in the region, was against settlement and any economic activity other than its own, so that the development of settlements and resources did not occur in any way until Fraser Canyon Gold Rush of 1858, which formalized British claims on the mainland still residual from the Nootka conventions in the colony of British Columbia. Wikisource has the original text associated with this article: Nootka Sound Convention Wikisource has the original text associated with this article: Nootka Claims Convention Wikisource has the original text associated with this article: Convention on Mutual Rejection of Nootka See also Fort San Miguel Links - Benson, Robert Louis; Robert Charles Figueira (2006). Plenum of power: Doctrines and exercise of power in the Middle Ages. Ashgate Publishing House. 137-138. ISBN 978-0-7546-3173-6. Peckick, Derek, The Nootka Connection, page 260, Vancouver, Douglas and McIntyre, 1980 - Towell, Freeman M. The Far Achievements of the Empire: the life of Juan Francisco De La Bodega Y Kwadra. University of British Columbia Press. 252-253. ISBN 978-0-7748-1367-9. Robert King, George Vancouver and the contemplated settlement in Notka Sound, Great Circle, vol.32, No. 1, 2010, p.6-34; In the Far East of the Empire, page 263, see, for example, Chenette, Richard D. (May 4, 1987). Argentine takeover of the Malvinas (Falkland Islands): history and diplomacy. Received on April 10, 2010. and Todini, Bruno (2007). Falkland Islands, history, war and economy. Chapter 2: The beginning of disputes over the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands between the Spanish, British and French. 252-253. ISBN 978-84-690-6590-7. Archive from the original 2009-11-29. Peckick, Derek, Nootka Connection, 266, Vancouver, Douglas and McIntyre, 1980 Derek, Union Nootka, p. 268, Vancouver, Douglas and McIntyre, 1980 - Carlos Calvo, Recueil complet des trait's, conventions, surrender, truce and autres acts to the diplomats de tous les'tats de l'Am'reique latine, Tome IIIe, Paris, Durand, 1862, pp.366. Extracted from the of Their British and Catholic Majesty, wanting to stop, The two Crowns considered that the best way to achieve this beneficial object would be a friendly agreement, which, putting aside all retrospective discussions of the rights and claims of both parties, should regulate their respective positions for the future on a basis that would be in their true interests, as well as the mutual desires with which they were told by Majesty, establishing each other, in all places, in all places, in all places, in all places, in all places, the very best interests.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory » Nomination Form
    THEME: Spanish .Exploration and Settlement; Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) NATIONAL ^STORIC LANDMARK Sou ast. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY » NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS _____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS_________ | NAME HISTORIC Bateria de San Antonio AND/OR COMMON Bateria de San Antonio/Battery San Antonio/Fort San Carlos (de Barrancas) | LOCATION Pensacola Naval Air Station STREET & NUMBER northeast of corner of San Carlos and CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Pensacola VICINITY OF first STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Florida 12 Esramhia CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT X-PUBLIC X-OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL X_PARK JXSTRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS _EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS X-YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED _YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME United States Government/ National Park Service / Gulf Islands National Seashore, STREET& NUMBER Fort Pickens (headquarters) CITY. TOWN STATE Santa Rosa Island VICINITY OF Florida 32459 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, See U.S. Department of the Interior REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic American Buildings Survey (No. Fla-144)
    [Show full text]
  • Ucluelet Final
    Culture and Heritage Study, Marine Resource Sites and Activities, Maa-nulth First Nations Ucluelet First Nation Project Final Report Halibut and herring eggs drying on racks at Ucluelet, 1890s. Royal B.C. Museum photo PN 1176. Prepared for Ucluelet First Nation by Traditions Consulting Services, Inc. Chatwin Engineering Ltd. March 12, 2004 “But the ocean is more the home of these people than the land, and the bounteous gifts of nature in the former element seem more to their taste and are more easily procured than the beasts of the forest.... ...Without a question these people are the richest in every respect in British Columbia...” George Blenkinsop, 1874. Note to Reader Thanks is offered to the Maa­nulth First Nations for their support of the project for which this is the Final Report, and especially to the h=aw`iih (chiefs), elders and cultural advisors who have shared their knowledge in the past, and throughout the project. In this report, reference is made to “Maa­nulth First Nations,” a recent term. Within the context of this report, that term is intended to refer to the Huu­ay­aht First Nation, the Uchucklesaht Tribe, the Toquaht First Nation, the Ucluelet First Nation, the Ka:'yu:k't'h/Che:k'tles7et'h' First Nation, and to the tribes and groups that were their predecessors. No attempt has been made to standardize the linguistic transcription of native names or words in this report. These are presented in the manner in which they were encountered in various source materials. Management Summary This is the Final Report for the Culture and Heritage Study, Marine Resource Sites and Activities, Maa­nulth First Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Achievements of Captain George Vancouver on The
    THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF CAPTAIN GEORGE VANCOUVER ON THE BRITISH COLUMBIA COAST. by William J. Roper A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of HISTORY The University of British Columbia October, 1941 THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF CAPTAIN GEORGE VANCOUVER ON THE BRITISH COLUMBIA COAST TABLE Off CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Chapter I. Apprenticeship. Page 1 Chapter II. The Nootka Sound Controversy. Page 7 Chapter III. Passage to the Northwest Coast. Page 15 Chapter IV. Survey—Cape Mendocino to Admiralty Inlet. Page 21 Chapter V. Gulf of Georgia—Johnstone Straits^-Nootka. Page 30 Chapter VI. Quadra and Vancouver at Nootka. Page 47 Chapter VII. Columbia River, Monterey, Second Northward Survey, Sandwich Islands. Page 57 Chapter VIII. Third Northern Survey. Page 70 Chapter IX. Return to England. Page 84 Chapter X. Summary of Vancouver's Ac hi evement s. Page 88 Appendix I. Letter of Vancouver to Evan Nepean. ' Page 105 Appendix II. Controversy between Vancouver and Menzies. Page 110 Appendix III. Comments on.Hewett's Notes. Page 113 Appendix IV. Hydrographic Surveys of the Northwest Coast. Page 115 Bibliography- Page I* INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION I wish to take this opportunity to express my thanks to Dr. W. N. Sage, Head of the Department of History of the University of British Columbia for his helpful suggestions and aid in the preparation of this thesis. CHAPTER I. APPRENTICESHIP THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF CAPTAIN GEORGE VANCOUVER ON THE BRITISH COLUMBIA COAST CHAPTER I. APPRENTICESHIP What were the achievements of Captain Vancouver on the British Columbia coast? How do his achievements compare with those of Captain Cook and the Spanish explorers? Why was an expedition sent to the northwest coast at this time? What qualifications did Vancouver have for the position of commander of the expedition? These and other pertinent questions will receive consideration in this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Decolonizing the Colonial Mind: a Personal Journey of Intercultural
    Decolonizing the Colonial Mind: A Personal Journey of Intercultural Understanding, Empathy, and Mutual Respect by Gregory W.A. Saar A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Religion & Culture University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2020 by Gregory W.A. Saar Saar 1 Dedication To my wife, Joyce, whose confidence in me, encouragement, and support, have always been important in everything I choose to do. To my Granddaughter, Rebekah, who, while in her first year at the University of Manitoba, uttered the words: “Grandpa, why don’t you take a class too?” To my other grandchildren Kaleb, Quintin, Alexis, and Clark, for the many ways in which they enhance my life. I hope I can play some small part in ensuring the five of you have the bright and fulfilling future you all deserve. I am confident that each one of you is capable of realising your dreams. In Memory of our daughter, Heather, who met the difficulties she faced with fortitude, courage, and determination, all the while retaining her sense of humour; an inspiration to all who were privileged to know her. Saar 2 Acknowledgements I want to express my appreciation to those without whose mentorship and assistance this theses would still be confined to the recesses of my mind. I begin with my appreciation of Dr. Renate Eigenbrod, (1944-2014) who, as Department Head of Native Studies at the University of Manitoba, took the time to interview me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistent Potato
    The Persistent Potato We did not know about this tasty potato until we moved to the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State. Now it is established in our garden where the plants produce small, slender, and somewhat gnarled, pale, yellow potatoes. They are especially delicious when roasted and keep well throughout the winter in our cool garage. Flavorful Ozette fingerling potato INTRODUCTION In recent years, eighteenth century Spanish sailing incursions into the inland seas of the Pacific Northwest have been the subject of increased scholarly research, but in the past little if anything was taught in schools about the presence of Spanish ships north of the 45th parallel. Even fewer in-depth studies were made of the cultures of the people who had for thousands of years made the rim of the north Pacific their home. In hindsight, the impact of the European newcomers, initially few in number, was far-ranging, not only for its political intrigues and influence on the lives of the local indigenous people, but in a very practical way. The Spanish came not so much for conquest (except for that which involved competition for land with their European and American counterparts) but rather for trade. However, this primary objective implied a secondary one — permanence. Land-based occupation, whether with permission or not, was part of the Spanish intent, as they sought to extend their nation’s presence north of their California base. For both the purpose of trade, as well as the option of establishing enduring settlements as directed by their King, the Spanish brought provisions that could support more than a season or two in the northern latitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Draft
    PRELIMINARY DRAFT Pacific Northwest Quarterly Index Volumes 1–98 N­R Compiled by Janette Rawlings A few notes on the use of this index The index was alphabetized using the word­by­word system. In this system, alphabetizing continues until the end of the first word. Subsequent words are considered only when other entries begin with the same word. The locators consist of the volume number, issue number, and page numbers. So, in the entry “Gamblepudding and Sons, 36(3):261–62,” 36 refers to the volume number, 3 to the issue number, and 261­62 to the page numbers. ii “‘Names Joined Together as Our Hearts Are’: The N Friendship of Samuel Hill and Reginald H. NAACP. See National Association for the Thomson,” by William H. Wilson, 94(4):183­ Advancement of Colored People 96 Naches and Columbia River Irrigation Canal, "The Naming of Seward in Alaska," 1(3):159–161 10(1):23–24 "The Naming of Elliott Bay: Shall We Honor the Naches Pass, Wash., 14(1):78–79 Chaplain or the Midshipman?," by Howard cattle trade, 38(3):194–195, 202, 207, 213 A. Hanson, 45(1):28–32 The Naches Pass Highway, To Be Built Over the "Naming Stampede Pass," by W. P. Bonney, Ancient Klickitat Trail the Naches Pass 12(4):272–278 Military Road of 1852, review, 36(4):363 Nammack, Georgiana C., Fraud, Politics, and the Nackman, Mark E., A Nation within a Nation: Dispossession of the Indians: The Iroquois The Rise of Texas Nationalism, review, Land Frontier in the Colonial Period, 69(2):88; rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Entanglements: the 1791 William Augustus Bowles Rebellion
    Florida Entanglements: The 1791 William Augustus Bowles Rebellion by Clinton Hough A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Liberal Arts Department of Florida Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida St. Petersburg Chair, Dr. Michael Francis, PhD Dr. Gary Mormino, PhD Dr. Raymond Arsenault, PhD Date of Approval: January 9, 2017 Keywords: (Creek, British, Spanish, Apalache, Borderlands) Copyright © 2017, Clinton Hough Table of Contents List of Figures....................................................................................................................... ii Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Free Trade Between Florida Creeks and British Bahamas ........................... 17 Chapter 3: Sovereign State of Muscogee ........................................................................ 33 Chapter 4: Rash Decision and Collapse .......................................................................... 46 Chapter 5: Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 55 References ........................................................................................................................ 60 i List of Figures Figure 1: The American Indian Nations………………………………………………………..6
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola During the Second Spanish Period
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 37 Number 3 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 37, Article 7 Issue 3-4 1958 Pensacola During the Second Spanish Period L. N. McAlister Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation McAlister, L. N. (1958) "Pensacola During the Second Spanish Period," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 37 : No. 3 , Article 7. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol37/iss3/7 McAlister: Pensacola During the Second Spanish Period PENSACOLA DURING THE SECOND SPANISH PERIOD, by L. N. MCALISTER I. SPAIN RETURNS TO PENSACOLA, 1781 N THE FIRST DAY of January, 1777, an event in New Or- O leans was to have important consequences for the history of Pensacola: Bernardo de Galvez formally assumed the governor- ship of Louisiana. Galvez was typical of the colonial officials who were appointed during that Indian Summer of Spanish Imperial history, the reign of Charles III. A career officer in the royal armies, he had already distinguished himself in several theaters: first in Portugal, then in Mexico against the Indians on the northern frontier where, under his famous uncle Jose de Galvez, he displayed those traits of energy, initiative, and leader- ship which characterized his subsequent career. During the next few years he served in the French army for training purposes and in 1776 was ordered to New Orleans as commander of the garrison and subsequently promoted to the governorship of the colony while still less than thirty years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad Complutense RESUMEN: El Conflicto De Nootka
    HISPANIA. Revista Española de Historia, 2008, vol. LXVIII, núm. 228, enero-abril, págs. 151-192, ISSN: 0018-2141 GÉNESIS DEL II IMPERIO BRITÁNICO Y OCASO DEL UNIVERSALISMO ESPAÑOL: LA DOBLE VERTIENTE DEL CONFLICTO DE NOOTKA (1790) ANTONIO CALVO MATURANA Universidad Complutense RESUMEN: El conflicto de Nootka es un interesante prisma desde el que analizar la situación de los tres grandes Estados de la Europa occidental a finales del siglo XVIII: Francia, Inglaterra y España. Los dos últimos mantuvieron un fascinante pulso diplomático en el que la monarquía española tenía las de perder por la herida de gravedad que la reciente Revolución Francesa había provocado a su gran apoyo du- rante el siglo XVIII: el Pacto de Familia. El —hasta ahora impracticado— estu- dio conjunto de la correspondencia de los embajadores ingleses y del español nos ayu- dará a acercarnos mejor a este episodio que simboliza el declive definitivo de un imperio y la recuperación inglesa del golpe de 1783. PALABRAS CLAVE: Nootka Sound. Nutka. Tratado de El Escorial. Conde de Floridablanca. William Pitt. Alleyne Fitzherbert. Bernardo del Campo. Pacto de Familia. Carlos IV. GENEIS OF THE II BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE FALL OF SPANISH UNIVERSALISM: RECON- SIDERING THE NOOTKA CONFLICT OF 1790 ABSTRACT: The Nootka-Sound affair is a great opportunity to analyse international relationships during the first phase of the French Revolution as well as the emergence of the contemporary concept of colonialism. The Spanish Monarchy and its long-established family alliances within the House of Bourbon had to face a new diplomatic environment in which Great Britain and revolutionary France had a dominant role.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain's Withdrawal from Nootka Sound, 1793- *795 GHRISTON I
    Retreat from the North: Spain's Withdrawal from Nootka Sound, 1793- *795 GHRISTON I. ARCHER The concluding act of the Nootka Sound Controversy took place on 28 March 1795, when representatives of Spain and Britain met at Friendly Cove (Yuquot) on the isolated Northwest Coast. The meeting ended a drama which had threatened to submerge the European powers in a major conflict. For historians, as well as for contemporary observers, the ceremonial raising of the Union Jack, followed by the departure of the military garrison from New Spain's most northerly outpost, marked the end of an epoch. Remarkably, however, the record of what took place during the last days of Spanish Nootka has not been published until the present. In 1917 when the British Columbia historian, Judge Frederick H. Howay, described the withdrawal from Nootka in an article for the Washington Historical Quarterly, he lacked the archival data to explain what had taken place. Instead, he added a colourful, if completely fanci­ ful, final scenario.1 As the Spaniards sailed away, the abandoned build­ ings remained as the only sign of civilization's touch. Immediately the Indians reoccupied their summer village site and in their search for scraps of metal and iron nails smashed all vestiges of European habitation. Howay described them "like ghouls"2 exhuming coffins from the grave­ yards to find nails suitable for fish hooks. No recent historian questioned the lack of documentation for this information. Indeed, when Warren L. Cook researched his volume Flood Tide of Empire: Spain and the Pacific Northwest, I543~i8ig (New Haven, 1973), he found no evidence to dispute Howay.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancún Cozumel
    dventure GuideTM to the Yucatán Cancún& Cozumel Bruce & June Conord 2nd Edition Bruce & June Conord HUNTER HUNTER PUBLISHING, INC, 130 Campus Drive, Edison, NJ 08818 732-225-1900; 800-255-0343; fax 732-417-1744 [email protected] Ulysses Travel Publications 4176 Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec Canada H2W 2M5 514-843-9882, ext. 2232; fax 514-843-9448 Windsor Books The Boundary, Wheatley Road, Garsington Oxford, OX44 9EJ England 01865-361122; fax 01865-361133 ISBN 1-55650-908-1 © 2001 Hunter Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written per- mission of the publisher. This guide focuses on recreational activities. As all such activities contain el- ements of risk, the publisher, author, affiliated individuals and companies disclaim any responsibility for any injury, harm, or illness that may occur to anyone through, or by use of, the information in this book. Every effort was made to insure the accuracy of information in this book, but the publisher and author do not assume, and hereby disclaim, any liability for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misleading information or potential travel problems caused by this guide, even if such errors or omissions are the result of negligence, accident or any other cause. Cover photo: Girl in pool, Casa de los Sueños, Isla Mujeres © 2001 June Conord Back cover photo: Orange vendor © 2001 June Conord Maps by Kim André, © 2001 Hunter Publishing, Inc. Cach Mool logo © 2001 Bruce & June Conord; design by Judy Mazziotti ([email protected]) All other images © 2001 Bruce & June Conord 1234 Acknowledgements n iii Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the Mexico Ministry of Tourism and the individual State Offices of Tourism for their invaluable help in preparing this guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Uvic Thesis Template
    ‗That Immense and Dangerous Sea‘: Spanish Imperial Policy and Power During the Exploration of the Salish Sea, 1790-1791. by Devon Drury BA, University of Victoria, 2007 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History Devon Drury, 2010 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee ‗That Immense and Dangerous Sea‘: Spanish Imperial Policy and Power During the Exploration of the Salish Sea, 1790-1791. by Devon Drury BA, University of Victoria, 2007 Supervisory Committee Dr. John Lutz, Department of History Supervisor Dr. Eric W. Sager, Department of History Departmental Member Dr. Patrick A. Dunae, Department of History Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. John Lutz, Department of History Supervisor Dr. Eric W. Sager, Department of History Departmental Member Dr. Patrick A. Dunae, Department of History Departmental Member In the years between 1789 and 1792 the shores of what is now British Columbia were opened to European scrutiny by a series of mostly Spanish expeditions. As the coastline was charted and explored by agents of European empires, the Pacific Northwest captured the attention of Europe. In order to carry out these explorations the Spanish relied on what turned out to be an experiment in ‗gentle‘ imperialism that depended on the support of the indigenous ―colonized‖. This thesis examines how the Spanish envisioned their imperial space on the Northwest Coast and particularly how that space was shaped through the exploration of the Salish Sea.
    [Show full text]