Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, pp. 1–27 doi:10.1093/icb/icab090 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology SYMPOSIUM How Signaling Geometry Shapes the Efficacy and Evolution of Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icb/advance-article/doi/10.1093/icb/icab090/6280543 by Princeton University user on 05 August 2021 Animal Communication Systems Sebastian A. Echeverri ,*,1 Audrey E. Miller,† Jason Chen,*,‡ Eden W. McQueen,* Melissa Plakke,*,§ Michelle Spicer,*,¶ Kim L. Hoke,k Mary Caswell Stoddard† and Nathan I. Morehouse*,kk *Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 4249 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; †Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, 106A Guyot Hall Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544-2016, USA; ‡Department of Biology, Emory University, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Room 2006, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; §Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 2045 Haworth Hall 1200 Sunnyside Ave. Lawrence, KS 66045, USA; ¶Department of Biology, University of Puget Sound, 1500 N. Warner St. Tacoma, WA 98416, USA; kDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, 251 W Pitkin St, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA; kkDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210006 Cincinnati, OH 45221-0006, USA From the Symposium “Spatiotemporal dynamics of animal communication” presented at the virtual annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2021. 1E-mail:
[email protected] Synopsis Animal communication is inherently spatial. Both signal transmission and signal reception have spatial biases—involving direction, distance, and position—that interact to determine signaling efficacy. Signals, be they visual, acoustic, or chemical, are often highly directional.