DOCSLIB.ORG

Archive Rates 10-01-18 to 3-31-19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archive Rates 10-01-18 to 3-31-19 California City and County Sales and Use Tax Rates Rates Effective 10/01/2018 through 03/31/2019 City Rate County City Rate County Acampo 7.750% San Joaquin American Canyon* 7.750% Napa Acton 9.500% Los Angeles Anaheim* 7.750% Orange Adelaida 7.250% San Luis Obispo Anderson* 7.750% Shasta Adelanto* 7.750% San Bernardino Angels Camp* 7.250% Calaveras Adin 7.250% Modoc Angelus Oaks 7.750% San Bernardino Agoura 9.500% Los Angeles Angwin 7.750% Napa Agoura Hills* 9.500% Los Angeles Annapolis 8.125% Sonoma Agua Caliente 8.125% Sonoma Antelope 7.750% Sacramento Agua Caliente Springs 7.750% San Diego Antelope Acres 9.500% Los Angeles Agua Dulce 9.500% Los Angeles Antioch* 8.750% Contra Costa Aguanga 7.750% Riverside Anza 7.750% Riverside Ahwahnee 7.750% Madera Apple Valley* 7.750% San Bernardino Al Tahoe 7.250% El Dorado Applegate 7.250% Placer Alameda* 9.250% Alameda Aptos 8.500% Santa Cruz Alamo 8.250% Contra Costa Arbuckle 7.250% Colusa Albany* 9.750% Alameda Arcadia* 9.500% Los Angeles Alberhill (Lake Elsinore*) 7.750% Riverside Arcata* 8.500% Humboldt Albion 7.875% Mendocino Argus 7.750% San Bernardino Alderpoint 7.750% Humboldt Arleta (Los Angeles*) 9.500% Los Angeles Alhambra* 9.500% Los Angeles Arlington (Riverside*) 8.750% Riverside Aliso Viejo* 7.750% Orange Armona 7.250% Kings Alleghany 7.250% Sierra Army Terminal 9.250% Alameda Almaden Valley 9.000% Santa Clara Arnold 7.250% Calaveras Almanor 7.250% Plumas Aromas 7.750% Monterey Almondale 9.500% Los Angeles Arrowbear Lake 7.750% San Bernardino Alondra 9.500% Los Angeles Arrowhead Highlands 7.750% San Bernardino Alpaugh 7.750% Tulare Arroyo Grande* 7.750% San Luis Obispo Alpine 7.750% San Diego Artesia* 9.500% Los Angeles Alta 7.250% Placer Artois 7.250% Glenn Alta Loma (Rancho 7.750% San Bernardino Arvin* 8.250% Kern Cucamonga*) Ashland 9.250% Alameda Altadena 9.500% Los Angeles Asti 8.125% Sonoma Altaville 7.250% Calaveras Atascadero* 7.750% San Luis Obispo Alton 7.750% Humboldt Athens 9.500% Los Angeles Alturas* 7.250% Modoc Atherton* 8.750% San Mateo Alviso (San Jose*) 9.250% Santa Clara Atwater* 8.250% Merced Amador City* 7.750% Amador Atwood 7.750% Orange Amargosa (Death Valley) 7.750% Inyo Auberry 7.975% Fresno Amboy 7.750% San Bernardino Auburn* 7.250% Placer 1 | Page (Note: “*” next to city indicates incorporated city) California City and County Sales and Use Tax Rates Rates Effective 10/01/2018 through 03/31/2019 City Rate County City Rate County Avalon* 10.000% Los Angeles Belden 7.250% Plumas Avenal* 7.250% Kings Bell Gardens* 9.500% Los Angeles Avery 7.250% Calaveras Bell* 9.500% Los Angeles Avila Beach 7.250% San Luis Obispo Bella Vista 7.250% Shasta Azusa* 9.500% Los Angeles Bellflower* 9.500% Los Angeles Badger 7.750% Tulare Belmont* 9.250% San Mateo Bailey 9.500% Los Angeles Belvedere* 8.250% Marin Baker 7.750% San Bernardino Ben Lomond 8.500% Santa Cruz Bakersfield* 7.250% Kern Benicia* 8.375% Solano Balboa (Newport Beach*) 7.750% Orange Benton 7.250% Mono Balboa Island (Newport 7.750% Orange Berkeley* 9.250% Alameda Beach*) Bermuda Dunes 7.750% Riverside Balboa Park (San Diego*) 7.750% San Diego Berry Creek 7.250% Butte Baldwin Park* 9.500% Los Angeles Bethel Island 8.250% Contra Costa Ballard 7.750% Santa Barbara Betteravia 7.750% Santa Barbara Ballico 7.750% Merced Beverly Hills* 9.500% Los Angeles Ballroad 7.750% Orange Bieber 7.250% Lassen Bangor 7.250% Butte Big Bar 7.250% Trinity Banning* 7.750% Riverside Big Basin 8.500% Santa Cruz Banta 7.750% San Joaquin Big Bear City 7.750% San Bernardino Bard 7.750% Imperial Big Bear Lake* 7.750% San Bernardino Barrington 9.500% Los Angeles Big Bend 7.250% Shasta Barstow* 7.750% San Bernardino Big Creek 7.975% Fresno Bartlett 7.750% Inyo Big Oak Flat 7.250% Tuolumne Barton 7.975% Fresno Big Pine 7.750% Inyo Base Line 7.750% San Bernardino Big River 7.750% San Bernardino Bass Lake 7.750% Madera Big Sur 7.750% Monterey Bassett 9.500% Los Angeles Biggs* 7.250% Butte Baxter 7.250% Placer Bijou 7.250% El Dorado Bay Point (formally West 8.250% Contra Costa Biola 7.975% Fresno Pittsburg) Biola College (La Mirada*) 9.500% Los Angeles Bayside 7.750% Humboldt Birds Landing 7.375% Solano Baywood Park 7.250% San Luis Obispo Bishop* 7.750% Inyo Beale A.F.B. 7.250% Yuba Black Hawk 8.250% Contra Costa Bear River Lake 7.750% Amador Blairsden 7.250% Plumas Bear Valley 7.250% Alpine Blocksburg 7.750% Humboldt Bear Valley 7.750% Mariposa Bloomington 7.750% San Bernardino Beaumont* 7.750% Riverside Blossom Hill 9.000% Santa Clara Beckwourth 7.250% Plumas Blossom Valley 9.000% Santa Clara Bel Air Estates (Los Angeles*) 9.500% Los Angeles 2 | Page (Note: “*” next to city indicates incorporated city) California City and County Sales and Use Tax Rates Rates Effective 10/01/2018 through 03/31/2019 City Rate County City Rate County Blue Jay 7.750% San Bernardino Brooks 7.250% Yolo Blue Lake* 7.750% Humboldt Browns Valley 7.250% Yuba Blythe* 7.750% Riverside Brownsville 7.250% Yuba Bodega 8.125% Sonoma Bryn Mawr 7.750% San Bernardino Bodega Bay 8.125% Sonoma Bryte (West Sacramento*) 8.000% Yolo Bodfish 7.250% Kern Buellton* 7.750% Santa Barbara Bolinas 8.250% Marin Buena Park* 7.750% Orange Bolsa 7.750% Orange Burbank* 9.500% Los Angeles Bombay Beach 7.750% Imperial Burlingame* 9.000% San Mateo Bonita 7.750% San Diego Burney 7.250% Shasta Bonny Doon 8.500% Santa Cruz Burnt Ranch 7.250% Trinity Bonsall 7.750% San Diego Burrel 7.975% Fresno Boonville 7.875% Mendocino Burson 7.250% Calaveras Boron 7.250% Kern Butte City 7.250% Glenn Borrego Springs 7.750% San Diego Butte Meadows 7.250% Butte Bostonia 7.750% San Diego Buttonwillow 7.250% Kern Boulder Creek 8.500% Santa Cruz Byron 8.250% Contra Costa Boulevard 7.750% San Diego Cabazon 7.750% Riverside Bouquet Canyon (Santa 9.500% Los Angeles Cabrillo 9.500% Los Angeles Clarita*) Cadiz 7.750% San Bernardino Bowman 7.250% Placer Calabasas Highlands 9.500% Los Angeles Boyes Hot Springs 8.125% Sonoma Calabasas Park 9.500% Los Angeles Bradbury* 9.500% Los Angeles Calabasas* 9.500% Los Angeles Bradford 9.250% Alameda Calexico* 8.250% Imperial Bradley 7.750% Monterey Caliente 7.250% Kern Branscomb 7.875% Mendocino California City* 7.250% Kern Brawley* 7.750% Imperial California Hot Springs 7.750% Tulare Brea* 7.750% Orange California Valley 7.250% San Luis Obispo Brents Junction 9.500% Los Angeles Calimesa* 7.750% Riverside Brentwood (Los Angeles*) 9.500% Los Angeles Calipatria* 7.750% Imperial Brentwood* 8.250% Contra Costa Calistoga* 7.750% Napa Briceland 7.750% Humboldt Callahan 7.250% Siskiyou Bridgeport 7.250% Mono Calpella 7.875% Mendocino Bridgeport 7.750% Mariposa Calpine 7.250% Sierra Bridgeville 7.750% Humboldt Calwa 7.975% Fresno Brisbane* 8.750% San Mateo Camarillo* 7.250% Ventura Broderick (West 8.000% Yolo Cambria 7.250% San Luis Obispo Sacramento*) Cambrian Park 9.000% Santa Clara Brookdale 8.500% Santa Cruz Cameron Park 7.250% El Dorado Brookhurst Center 7.750% Orange 3 | Page (Note: “*” next to city indicates incorporated city) California City and County Sales and Use Tax Rates Rates Effective 10/01/2018 through 03/31/2019 City Rate County City Rate County Camino 7.250% El Dorado Cartago 7.750% Inyo Camp Beale 7.250% Yuba Caruthers 7.975% Fresno Camp Connell 7.250% Calaveras Casitas Springs 7.250% Ventura Camp Curry 7.750% Mariposa Casmalia 7.750% Santa Barbara Camp Kaweah 7.750% Tulare Caspar 7.875% Mendocino Camp Meeker 8.125% Sonoma Cassel 7.250% Shasta Camp Nelson 7.750% Tulare Castaic 9.500% Los Angeles Camp Pendleton 7.750% San Diego Castella 7.250% Shasta Camp Roberts 7.750% Monterey Castle A.F.B. 7.750% Merced Campbell* 9.250% Santa Clara Castro Valley 9.250% Alameda Campo 7.750% San Diego Castroville 7.750% Monterey Campo Seco 7.250% Calaveras Cathedral City* 8.750% Riverside Camptonville 7.250% Yuba Catheys Valley 7.750% Mariposa Canby 7.250% Modoc Cayucos 7.250% San Luis Obispo Canoga Annex 9.500% Los Angeles Cazadero 8.125% Sonoma Canoga Park (Los 9.500% Los Angeles Cecilville 7.250% Siskiyou Angeles*) Cedar 9.500% Los Angeles Cantil 7.250% Kern Cedar Crest 7.975% Fresno Cantua Creek 7.975% Fresno Cedar Glen 7.750% San Bernardino Canyon 8.250% Contra Costa Cedar Ridge 7.500% Nevada Canyon Country (Santa 9.500% Los Angeles Cedarpines Park 7.750% San Bernardino Clarita*) Cedarville 7.250% Modoc Canyon Lake* 7.750% Riverside Central Valley 7.250% Shasta Canyondam 7.250% Plumas Century City (Los 9.500% Los Angeles Capay 7.250% Yolo Angeles*) Capistrano Beach (Dana 7.750% Orange Ceres* 8.375% Stanislaus Point*) Cerritos* 9.500% Los Angeles Capitola* 9.000% Santa Cruz Challenge 7.250% Yuba Cardiff By The Sea 7.750% San Diego Chambers Lodge 7.250% Placer (Encinitas*) Cardwell 7.975% Fresno Charter Oak 9.500% Los Angeles Carlotta 7.750% Humboldt Chatsworth (Los Angeles*) 9.500% Los Angeles Carlsbad* 7.750% San Diego Cherry Valley 7.750% Riverside Carmel Rancho 7.750% Monterey Chester 7.250% Plumas Carmel Valley 7.750% Monterey Chicago Park 7.500% Nevada Carmel* 8.750% Monterey Chico* 7.250% Butte Carmichael 7.750% Sacramento Chilcoot 7.250% Plumas Carnelian Bay 7.250% Placer China Lake NWC 8.250% Kern (Ridgecrest) Carpinteria* 7.750% Santa Barbara Chinese Camp 7.250% Tuolumne Carson* 9.500% Los Angeles Chino Hills* 7.750% San Bernardino 4 | Page (Note: “*” next to city indicates incorporated city) California City and County Sales and Use Tax Rates Rates Effective 10/01/2018 through 03/31/2019 City Rate County City Rate County Chino* 7.750% San Bernardino Columbia 7.250% Tuolumne Chiriaco Summit 7.750% Riverside Colusa* 7.250% Colusa Cholame 7.250% San Luis Obispo Commerce*
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archive Rates 1-1-18
    Prepaid MTS Rates Rates Effective 01/01/2018 through 03/31/2018 City Rate County City Rate County Acampo 6.300% San Joaquin American Canyon* 6.300% Napa Acton 10.800% Los Angeles Anaheim* 6.300% Orange Adelaida 6.300% San Luis Obispo Anderson* 6.300% Shasta Adelanto* 6.300% San Bernardino Angels Camp* 6.300% Calaveras Adin 6.300% Modoc Angelus Oaks 6.300% San Bernardino Agoura 10.800% Los Angeles Angwin 6.300% Napa Agoura Hills* 6.300% Los Angeles Annapolis 6.300% Sonoma Agua Caliente 6.300% Sonoma Antelope 6.300% Sacramento Agua Caliente Springs 6.300% San Diego Antelope Acres 10.800% Los Angeles Agua Dulce 10.800% Los Angeles Antioch* 6.300% Contra Costa Aguanga 6.300% Riverside Anza 6.300% Riverside Ahwahnee 6.300% Madera Apple Valley* 6.300% San Bernardino Al Tahoe 6.300% El Dorado Applegate 6.300% Placer Alameda* 13.800% Alameda Aptos 6.300% Santa Cruz Alamo 6.300% Contra Costa Arbuckle 6.300% Colusa Albany* 12.800% Alameda Arcadia* 10.800% Los Angeles Alberhill (Lake 6.300% Riverside Arcata* 8.800% Humboldt Elsinore*) Argus 6.300% San Bernardino Albion 6.300% Mendocino Arleta (Los Angeles*) 15.300% Los Angeles Alderpoint 6.300% Humboldt Arlington (Riverside*) 6.300% Riverside Alhambra* 6.300% Los Angeles Armona 6.300% Kings Aliso Viejo* 6.300% Orange Army Terminal 12.800% Alameda Alleghany 6.300% Sierra Arnold 6.300% Calaveras Almaden Valley 6.300% Santa Clara Aromas 6.300% Monterey Almanor 6.300% Plumas Arrowbear Lake 6.300% San Bernardino Almondale 10.800% Los Angeles Arrowhead Highlands 6.300% San Bernardino Alondra 10.800% Los
    [Show full text]
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
    Marin County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Prepared by Caroline Peattie and Jessica Tankersley, Fair Housing of Marin For the Marin County Community Development Agency Approved by the Marin County Board of Supervisors on October 11, 2011 MMMARIN CCCOUNTY CCCOMMUNITY DDDEVELOPMENT AAAGENCY BBBRIAN C.C.C. CCCRAWFORD ,,, DDDIRECTOR FFFEDERAL GGGRANTS DDDIVISION October 28, 2011 Mr. Chuck Hauptman, Regional Director Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Region IX U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 600 Harrison Street, Third Floor San Francisco, California 94107 Subject: County of Marin Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Dear Mr. Hauptman: On October 11, 2011, the Marin County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, including an Implementation Plan. This was the culmination of a process of ten public hearings. I am pleased to provide you with the enclosed copies of both documents. A video of the Board of Supervisors hearing is posted on the County’s website at http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/BS/Archive/Meetings.cfm . Please let me know if you have any comments about these items. Sincerely, Roy Bateman Community Development Coordinator cc: Supervisor Judy Arnold Sharon Chan Brian Crawford Jeff Jackson K:\Analysis Of Impediments (AI)\AI & Implementation Documents\Analysis Of Impediments - Final Version As Approved By Bos October 11 2011\Transmittal To HUD.Docx/rb Mailing Address: 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308, San Rafael, California 94903-4157 Office Location: 899 Northgate Drive, Room 408, San Rafael, California Telephone (415) 499-6698 - California Relay Service 711 - Fax (415) 507-4061 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In Marin County, it is unlawful to restrict housing choice on the basis of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, age, and source of income.
    [Show full text]
  • Species and Community Profiles to Six Clutches of Eggs, Totaling About 861 Eggs During California Vernal Pool Tadpole Her Lifetime (Ahl 1991)
    3 Invertebrates their effects on this species are currently being investi- Franciscan Brine Shrimp gated (Maiss and Harding-Smith 1992). Artemia franciscana Kellogg Reproduction, Growth, and Development Invertebrates Brita C. Larsson Artemia franciscana has two types of reproduction, ovovi- General Information viparous and oviparous. In ovoviviparous reproduction, the fertilized eggs in a female can develop into free-swim- The Franciscan brine shrimp, Artemia franciscana (for- ming nauplii, which are set free by the mother. In ovipa- merly salina) (Bowen et al. 1985, Bowen and Sterling rous reproduction, however, the eggs, when reaching the 1978, Barigozzi 1974), is a small crustacean found in gastrula stage, become surrounded by a thick shell and highly saline ponds, lakes or sloughs that belong to the are deposited as cysts, which are in diapause (Sorgeloos order Anostraca (Eng et al. 1990, Pennak 1989). They 1980). In the Bay area, cysts production is generally are characterized by stalked compound eyes, an elongate highest during the fall and winter, when conditions for body, and no carapace. They have 11 pairs of swimming Artemia development are less favorable. The cysts may legs and the second antennae are uniramous, greatly en- persist for decades in a suspended state. Under natural larged and used as a clasping organ in males. The aver- conditions, the lifespan of Artemia is from 50 to 70 days. age length is 10 mm (Pennak 1989). Brine shrimp com- In the lab, females produced an average of 10 broods, monly swim with their ventral side upward. A. franciscana but the average under natural conditions may be closer lives in hypersaline water (70 to 200 ppt) (Maiss and to 3-4 broods, although this has not been confirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality
    Redwood City New General Plan 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section discusses surface waters, groundwater resources, storm water collection and transmission, and flooding characteristics in the plan area. Key sources of information for this section include the San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) prepared by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (January 2007), the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Redwood City (2005), and the Unified Stream Assessment in Seven Watersheds in San Mateo County, California by the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program (August 2008), Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Consulting Engineers Water, Sewer Storm Drainage Master Plan dated 1986, and Winzler & Kelly’s Bayfront Canal Improvement Project Design Development Alternative Analysis, dated December 2003. 4.8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Hydrologic Conditions The regional climate of the plan area is typical of the San Francisco Bay Area and is characterized by dry, mild summers and moist, cool winters. Average annual precipitation in the plan area is about 20 inches. About 80 percent of local precipitation falls in the months of November through March. Over the last century for which precipitation records are available, annual precipitation has ranged from an historic low of 8.01 inches in 1976 to an historic high of 42.82 inches in 1983.1 Surface Waters Figure 4.4-1 (in Section 4.4, Biological Resources) depicts surface water bodies in the plan area, which include Redwood and Cordilleras Creeks and their tributaries. Also shown are bay channels, including Westpoint Slough, Corkscrew Slough, northerly reaches of Redwood Creek, Smith Slough and Steinberger Slough, the Atherton Channel (Marsh Creek), and the Bay Front Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • JOIN US!!! Here’S Where YOU Come Into the Picture
    Newsletter Issue 44 Fall 2014 It’s 50 years ago and San Francisco Bay’s wetlands are under attack from uncontrolled development and corporate greed. ASTOUNDING!! A small band of ordinary Citizens come together to take on these potent forces AND WIN!! The San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is created protecting many threatened wetlands! Hope is restored and the citizens put away their superhero costumes and return to normal life. Art courtesy of Sam High DISHEARTENED ! It isn’t over. Twenty years later aggressive development once again threatens wetlands not included within the Refuge. UNDAUNTED!! The band of Citizens rises again. New heroes and heroines join the fray. AMAZING!! International conglomerates are defeated, local developers prove powerless against the band of Citizens. SATISFYING!! The Refuge boundary is expanded and new wetlands are acquired and protected. The Refuge is renamed the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge. Despite its long name the Refuge flourishes. The Citizens again return to their daily lives. GLOOM!!! Thirty years later..... At this very moment!!! Crucial wetlands face destruction. The wetlands of Newark’s Area 4 and Redwood City’s salt ponds are home for breeding harbor seals, tens of thousands of shorebirds and waterfowl and for several endangered critters. These wetlands clean our water and our air and provide a necessary home for our bay’s fish and shellfish. But the Bay Area’s richest developers and the nation’s largest privately held corporation don’t care. They just see dollar signs. INCREDIBLE!!! The band of Citizens awakens once again to face its most daunting challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • South and Central Bay Wetlands Projects CONTRACT FINAL
    CONTRACT FINAL South and Central Bay Wetlands Projects CONTRACT FINAL County Database Primary Project Name Secondary Project Interviewee Contact Contact Contact Project Year Project Type Project Project Hydrology Landowner Map Map Reported Key Name Organization Name Phone # Status Purpose Status Acres Acres 3 Alameda ALBBUL Albany Bulb Lagoon Cheney, Ann City of Albany, Ann Cheney 510-528- Planned Creation Recovery Mixed Hydrology City of Albany Yes 6.7 0.0 Community Devt. 5768 Dept. 4 Alameda ALBMAR Albany Salt Marsh Condornices Creek Schwartz, Susan Friends of Five Susan Planned Enhancement Recovery Tidal Magna No 2.0 Expansion Mouth Creeks Schwartz Restoration Corporation (Golden Gate Fields) 51 Contra ALBSEQ Central Avenue Marsh, Highway 580 James, Robert Caltrans Chuck 510-286- Completed 1999 Restoration Mitigation Tidal Caltrans No 0.0 Costa Albany Sequel Interchange Marsh Morton 5681 83 Santa ALVISO Alviso Slough Marsh Batha, Bob BCDC Bob Batha 415-352- Unknown Creation Mitigation Tidal Yes 2.5 0.3 Clara 3612 65 San Mateo BAIR00 Bair Island SFO Wilcox, Carl CDFG Carl Wilcox 707-944- Completed 2000 Restoration Mitigation Seasonal Non-tidal CDFG Yes 50.0 37.0 Mitigation 5525 Creation 66 San Mateo BAIR01 Bair Island SFO Wilcox, Carl CDFG Carl Wilcox 707-944- Completed 2000 Restoration Mitigation Tidal CDFG Yes 170.1 142.0 Mitigation 5525 Creation 67 San Mateo BAIR02 Bair Island, USFWS Morris, Clyde USFWS Clyde Morris 510-792- Planned Restoration Recovery Tidal USFWS Yes 1385.4 1400.0 0222 68 San Mateo BAIR03 Pacific Shores Deep Wilcox, Carl LSA Steve Completed 2000 Restoration Mitigation Tidal Yes 113.7 50.0 Water Slough Foreman 69 San Mateo BAIR04 Northern Outer Bair Morris, Clyde USFWS Clyde Morris 510-792- Naturally 1980 Tidal USFWS Yes 551.7 0.0 Island 0222 Restored 5 Alameda BERKM2 Berkeley Meadows Granholm, Steve LSA Steve 510-236- Planned Enhancement Recovery Seasonal Non-tidal CA Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2015-2016 Final Budget
    CITY OF FOSTER CITY ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FINAL BUDGET Fiscal Year 2015-2016 CITY COUNCIL/DISTRICT BOARD Art Kiesel, Mayor / President Gary Pollard, Vice Mayor / Vice President Charlie Bronitsky Steve Okamoto Herb Perez SUBMITTED BY THE CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER Kevin M. Miller City of Foster City / Estero Municipal Improvement District 2015-2016 Final Budget Table of Contents Section Page Number I. Introduction City Government Organization Chart ........................................................................................................... 3 Mission Statement ....................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Budget Message ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 III. Budget Guide ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 IV. Five Year Financial Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 25 V. Financial and Personnel Summaries .................................................................................................................... 77 VI. Department Operating Budgets (including Detail Line Item Reports) City Council ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use and Circulation Element
    Land Use Background Chapter 3: Land Use and Circulation Element THE VISION OF FOSTER CITY AS PRESENTED IN THE LAND USE AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT Historically, Foster City has been committed to continuing the land use pattern envisioned in the original 1961 master plan and maintaining the design qualities, appearance and scale of its residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. In this regard, the three primary concerns of the Land Use and Circulation Element are to: Maintain the Integrity and High Quality Living Environment of the City's Residential Neighborhoods. Including maintaining quality architecture and appearance, protecting waterways and water orientation, continuing the emphasis that Foster City is a "master-planned" City, improving the City's tax base to pay for desired services, and assuring that City streets, facilities, parks and other amenities are maintained and improved to respond to City-wide and neighborhood needs. Achieve a Successful Build-out that Balances Jobs and Housing, Infrastructure Capacity with Development Needs. Including appropriate land use densities and intensities to integrate new development with the design, infrastructure and environmental conditions in the City, and evaluating the impacts and appropriateness of new Land Use and development with environmental conditions and needs of the City. Circulation Introduction Respond to Longer-Term Land Use and Circulation Needs in an Appropriate Manner. Land Use and Circulation Element Purpose By establishing a long-term perspective on City service The Land Use and Circulation Element focuses on and maintenance needs, and mitigation measures for past, present and future development issues any changes in land use as are reasonably necessary to affecting Foster City.
    [Show full text]
  • NATURAL RESOURCES Introduction
    NATURAL RESOURCES Introduction Wildflowers on Bair Island Natural Resources Introduction Natural Habitat and Vision Open Space Water Resources Urban Forest Energy Conservation atural resources are all around us, whether it is the water running from our faucets or flowing through Redwood N Creek, the natural habitat where animals and birds forage for food, or the tall trees that shade our streets and cools us as we walk through a park. These resources contribute tremendously to the quality of life in Redwood City and allow residents to enjoy and experience features not found in many urban environments. We must take care as most natural resources are not replenishable. This Element focuses on preserving, protecting, conserving, re‐using, and efficiently using Redwood City’s natural resources. Redwood City General Plan Page NR-1 Introduction NATURAL RESOURCES Introduction Natural resources are the lands, minerals and fossil fuels, wildlife, plants and trees, air, water, groundwater, drinking water, and other resources Natural Resource Chapters: obtained from the Earth. Some resources are managed, such as trees Water Resources growing in a park or drinking water that is transferred via pipelines from Water Supply sources miles away. Other resources are meant to flourish through Water Conservation conservation, such as marine wildlife or the wetland grasses that thrive Recycled Water on Bair, Bird, and Greco Islands. Some resources are processed far away Water Demand to generate fuel to power our cars and homes. These resources share a common theme: they are meant to be conserved and protected, so that Energy Conservation future generations of Redwood City residents can continue enjoy the Renewable Energy Use high quality of life we know today.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert N. Royston Collection, 1941-1990
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt8b69q7nx Online items available Inventory of the Robert N. Royston Collection, 1941-1990 MacKenzie Bennett, Meredith Hall, April Hesik under the supervision of Laura Tatum Environmental Design Archives College of Environmental Design 230 Wurster Hall #1820 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-1820 Phone: (510) 642-5124 Fax: (510) 642-2824 Email: [email protected] http://www.ced.berkeley.edu/cedarchives/ © 2005 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Inventory of the Robert N. 1999-12 1 Royston Collection, 1941-1990 Inventory of the Robert N. Royston Collection, 1941-1990 Collection number: 1999-12 Environmental Design Archives University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Processed by: MacKenzie Bennett, Meredith Hall, April Hesik under the supervision of Laura Tatum Date Completed: December 2004 Encoded by: Dayna Holz © 2005 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Robert N. Royston collection Dates: 1941-1990 Bulk Dates: 1946-1971 Collection number: 1999-12 Creator: Royston, Robert N., 1918- Collection Size: 1 manuscript box, 95 cartons, 24 cartons (folded drawings), 17 Flat File drawers Repository: Environmental Design Archives. College of Environmental Design. University of California, Berkeley. Berkeley, California Abstract: Contains records related to the life and career of landscape architect Robert N. Royston. The vast majority of this collection documents the projects of Royston's various firms, with a much smaller representation of Royston's work outside the firm in the professional or academic context. Of particular interest is Royston's participation in the landscape design for various sub-divisions and individual houses built by Eichler Homes and T.
    [Show full text]