Dopamine: a Role in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hypertension

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dopamine: a Role in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hypertension Journal of Human Hypertension (2000) 14, Suppl 1, S47–S50 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0950-9240/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/jhh Dopamine: a role in the pathogenesis and treatment of hypertension MB Murphy Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland The catecholamine dopamine (DA), activates two dis- (largely nausea and orthostasis) have precluded wide tinct classes of DA-specific receptors in the cardio- use of D2 agonists. In contrast, the D1 selective agonist vascular system and kidney—each capable of influenc- fenoldopam has been licensed for the parenteral treat- ing systemic blood pressure. D1 receptors on vascular ment of severe hypertension. Apart from inducing sys- smooth muscle cells mediate vasodilation, while on temic vasodilation it induces a diuresis and natriuresis, renal tubular cells they modulate sodium excretion. D2 enhanced renal blood flow, and a small increment in receptors on pre-synaptic nerve terminals influence nor- glomerular filtration rate. Evidence is emerging that adrenaline release and, consequently, heart rate and abnormalities in DA production, or in signal transduc- vascular resistance. Activation of both, by low dose DA tion of the D1 receptor in renal proximal tubules, may lowers blood pressure. While DA also binds to alpha- result in salt retention and high blood pressure in some and beta-adrenoceptors, selective agonists at both DA humans and in several animal models of hypertension. receptor classes have been studied in the treatment of Journal of Human Hypertension (2000) 14, Suppl 1, S47– hypertension. An unfavourable side-effect profile S50. Keywords: dopamine; blood pressure; hypertension Historical context Having also shown that the pressor effects of high dose DA could be abolished by alpha-adrenoceptor Dopamine (DA) was synthesised for the first time in blockade, Goldberg speculated that there were likely 1910, simultaneously at the Wellcome Laboratories to be specific receptors for DA, which might modu- of Sir Henry Dale in Britain, and in Germany by late blood pressure reduction and might be 1,2 Mannich and Jacobsohn. Initially, its pharmaco- exploited in the treatment of hypertension. Proof of logical effects were thought to mimic those of the the concept followed when he infused DA, follow- previously identified sympathomimetic amines, ing alpha-adrenoceptor blockade with phenoxyben- noradrenaline and adrenaline, raising blood press- zamine, in a severely hypertensive patient at Grady ure dose dependently. In 1942, Holtz reported a Hospital in Atlanta. Blood pressure fell dramatically novel observation that administration of low dose during DA infusion.6 The hypotensive effect was not dopamine to the guinea pig resulted in lowering of seen during DA infusion alone. The search for selec- arterial pressure, but the significance of this finding tive dopamine receptor agonists commenced. remained unclear for another 20 years.3 The depressor capacity of dopamine was con- firmed in experiments in the anesthetised dog in Dopamine receptors 1959 by Goldberg and Sjoerdsma.4 They demon- strated that low dose infusions of DA initially low- Characterisation of specific DA receptors was ered diastolic pressure. As the infusion rate approached from several angles over the past 30 increased, cardiac output increased, while higher years. Using classic physiology and pharmacology, 7 infusion rates led to increases in both systolic and Goldberg and Kohli concluded that there were two diastolic pressures.4 This capacity of DA to increase distinct types of peripheral (that is outside the cen- cardiac output without increasing peripheral resist- tral nervous system (CNS)) receptors: DA1 receptors ance, a therapeutic ‘Holy Grail’ for the treatment of on vascular smooth muscle, mediating vasodilation, congestive heart failure, led to careful trials in man. and what they characterised as DA2 receptors on It was during the first study in heart failure patients pre-synaptic membranes of sympathetic nerve ter- that Goldberg made the critical observation that DA minals, minimising noradrenaline release and also promoted an impressive diuresis and natriuresis, promoting vasodilation.7 Using a biochemical 8 which he correctly ascribed following further approach, Kebabian and Calne described D1 recep- experiments, to direct effects on the kidney, inde- tors whose occupation activated adenylate cyclase pendent of changes in cardiac output (for review and D2 receptors either uncoupled from, or with 8 see Goldberg5). opposite effects on, this second messenger. More recent studies using molecular cloning techniques have identified at least seven structurally distinct Correspondence: Professor Michael Murphy, Department of Phar- DA receptors, but whose pharmacological effects are macology and Therapeutics, Clinical Sciences Building, Cork encompassed by the earlier two receptor model. In University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland the modern hierarchical classification the two main Dopamine and hypertension MB Murphy S48 groupings (D1A with D1B—known in the numerical deficient in D1 receptors develop systolic and dias- 11 system as D1 and D5, with the second group D2A, tolic hypertension. D2B and D2C—numerical system D2, D3 D4 respectively) correspond functionally to Goldberg’s 9 DA1 and DA2 receptors. All DA receptors belong to the G-protein linked Dopamine modulation in cardiovascular superfamily, are located within the plasma mem- therapy brane and possess seven transmembranous domains. The signal transduction pathways of DA receptors Following the elucidation of its pharmacology, sev- have not been fully characterised. D1 receptors are eral diverse methods have been used to exploit linked to the Gs protein which activates adenylate dopamine in treating heart failure, shock and hyper- cyclase with the resulting cAMP activating protein tension. Infusion of DA became the gold standard kinase A. D2 receptors, in contrast, interact with Gi treatment of acute heart failure and cardiogenic which inhibits adenylate cyclase, but may also acti- shock, and, in spite of a paucity of randomised clini- vate certain potassium channels, inactivate calcium cal trial data, to preserve renal function during all channels, or promote phosphoinosotide hydrolysis forms of shock and acute renal impairment from and arachadonic acid release. A D1 receptor capable diverse causes. However, the necessity for par- of activating phospholipase C, leading to the gener- enteral administration, and its simultaneous actions ation of inositol phosphates and diacylglycerol has on several receptors, limited its therapeutic useful- been described in the kidney. ness. Accordingly, much effort was expended on the Peripheral DA1 receptors have been found in a development of specific receptor agonists and antag- variety of vascular beds, in large numbers on renal onists, inhibitors of dopamine-beta-hydroxylase to and mesenteric arteries, and to a lesser degree in cor- enhance endogenous concentrations, and pro-drugs onary, cerebral, cutaneous and skeletal arteries. designed to be administered orally for post-absorp- They are also found in renal proximal and distal tion conversion to DA. All of these approaches have tubular cells, adrenal cortex and cardiac muscle been investigated in hypertension. Indeed, several cells. DA2 receptors are found on pre-synaptic nerve of the compounds have been used as probes to deter- terminals and in sympathetic ganglia. DA1 receptors mine whether abnormalities in DA genesis or bind the prototypic agonist, fenoldopam and antag- actions might contribute to the pathogenesis of onist SCH 23390 while the corresponding ligands hypertension. for DA2 receptors include quinpirole and domperi- done respectively. Dopamine and the pathogenesis of Pro-drugs and enzyme modulators hypertension Clinical exploitation of DA focused initially on Several abnormalities in dopamine excretion or DA methods to enhance the availability of DA at its receptor signal transduction have been reported in receptors either through the use of pro-drugs that hypertensive cohorts (for review, see Hussain and 10 might be administered orally or parenteral prep- Lokhandwala. Impaired urinary DA excretion has arations with longer duration of action, largely for been reported in salt-sensitive hypertensive patients the treatment of congestive heart failure. Levodopa, and in some low-renin hypertensives. Suppressed ibopamine—the precursor of epinine which is active dopaminergic activity has also been described in off- at DA , beta- and alpha-adrenoceptors, and ␥-gluta- spring of hypertensive patients and in the pre- 1 myl-dopa (gludopa) another DA precursor, were hypertensive phase in others. Infusion of DA in studied clinically. All had some beneficial effects on patients with essential hypertension has been cardiac output, but variable effects on vascular reported to result in enhanced urinary cAMP resistance, and all ultimately proved unreliable (for excretion compared with normal controls. These 12 data have been interpreted as suggesting distal renal review see Murphy et al ). tubular DA receptor up-regulation in response to An enzymatic approach to enhancement of tissue 1 DA levels, with associated blockade of noradrena- defective DA synthesis in hypertensive individuals. ␤ However, there are no experimental data available line synthesis, is inhibition of dopamine - on receptor numbers or receptor ligand affinity in hydroxylase (DBH). Fusaric acid, the first inhibitor, 13 kidneys of hypertensive subjects.
Recommended publications
  • Dopamine D1 Rather Than D2 Receptor Agonists Disrupt Prepulse Inhibition of Startle in Mice
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 108–118 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/03 $25.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Dopamine D1 Rather than D2 Receptor Agonists Disrupt Prepulse Inhibition of Startle in Mice 1 2 ,2 Rebecca J Ralph-Williams , Virginia Lehmann-Masten and Mark A Geyer* 1 2 Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center, Harvard Medical School and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA Although substantial literature describes the modulation of prepulse inhibition (PPI) by dopamine (DA) in rats, few reports address the effects of dopaminergic manipulations on PPI in mice. We characterized the effects of subtype-specific DA agonists in the PPI paradigm to further delineate the specific influences of each DA receptor subtype on sensorimotor gating in mice. The mixed D1/D2 agonist apomorphine and the preferential D1-family agonists SKF82958 and dihydrexidine significantly disrupted PPI, with differing or no effects on startle. In contrast to findings in rats, the D2/D3 agonist quinpirole reduced startle but had no effect on PPI. Pergolide, which has affinity for D2/D3 and D1-like receptors, reduced both startle and PPI, but only at the higher, nonspecific doses. In addition, the D1-family receptor antagonist SCH23390 blocked the PPI-disruptive effects of apomorphine on PPI, but the D2-family receptor antagonist raclopride failed to alter the disruptive effect of apomorphine. These studies reveal potential species differences in the DA receptor modulation of PPI between rats and mice, where D1-family receptors may play a more prominent and independent role in the modulation of PPI in mice than in rats.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Large Scale
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Lehrstuhl für Genomorientierte Bioinformatik Large Scale Knowledge Extraction from Biomedical Literature Based on Semantic Role Labeling Thorsten Barnickel Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzende: Univ.‐Prof. Dr. I. Antes Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.‐Prof. Dr. H.‐W. Mewes 2. Univ.‐Prof. Dr. R. Zimmer (Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München) Die Dissertation wurde am 30. Juli bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 25. November 2009 angenommen. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to express my deep gratitude to my promoter Dr. Volker Stümpflen. Without his continuing, stimulating encouragement and his excellent background in Enterprise technologies still being predominantly used in the IT-industry rather than in academic research, I would not have been able to finish my doctorate in the presented form. Facing the tremendous amount of data that was generated by gathering the positional information of millions of biomedical terms, I was close to cutting the project down to a notably smaller version compared to the text mining system presented in this thesis. Volkers knowledge on database servers and performance tuning significantly contributed to the development of a database schema finally being able to cope with the immense amount of data. I would also like to cordially thank Prof. Dr. Hans-Werner Mewes, head of the Institute for Bioinformatics and Systems Biology (IBIS), for giving me the opportunity to do my doctorate at his institute and for his friendly support and encouragement all along my time at IBIS.
    [Show full text]
  • AHFS Pharmacologic-Therapeutic Classification System
    AHFS Pharmacologic-Therapeutic Classification System Abacavir 48:24 - Mucolytic Agents - 382638 8:18.08.20 - HIV Nucleoside and Nucleotide Reverse Acitretin 84:92 - Skin and Mucous Membrane Agents, Abaloparatide 68:24.08 - Parathyroid Agents - 317036 Aclidinium Abatacept 12:08.08 - Antimuscarinics/Antispasmodics - 313022 92:36 - Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs - Acrivastine 92:20 - Immunomodulatory Agents - 306003 4:08 - Second Generation Antihistamines - 394040 Abciximab 48:04.08 - Second Generation Antihistamines - 394040 20:12.18 - Platelet-aggregation Inhibitors - 395014 Acyclovir Abemaciclib 8:18.32 - Nucleosides and Nucleotides - 381045 10:00 - Antineoplastic Agents - 317058 84:04.06 - Antivirals - 381036 Abiraterone Adalimumab; -adaz 10:00 - Antineoplastic Agents - 311027 92:36 - Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs - AbobotulinumtoxinA 56:92 - GI Drugs, Miscellaneous - 302046 92:20 - Immunomodulatory Agents - 302046 92:92 - Other Miscellaneous Therapeutic Agents - 12:20.92 - Skeletal Muscle Relaxants, Miscellaneous - Adapalene 84:92 - Skin and Mucous Membrane Agents, Acalabrutinib 10:00 - Antineoplastic Agents - 317059 Adefovir Acamprosate 8:18.32 - Nucleosides and Nucleotides - 302036 28:92 - Central Nervous System Agents, Adenosine 24:04.04.24 - Class IV Antiarrhythmics - 304010 Acarbose Adenovirus Vaccine Live Oral 68:20.02 - alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors - 396015 80:12 - Vaccines - 315016 Acebutolol Ado-Trastuzumab 24:24 - beta-Adrenergic Blocking Agents - 387003 10:00 - Antineoplastic Agents - 313041 12:16.08.08 - Selective
    [Show full text]
  • Hypertensive Crises 8.25
    Hypertensive Crises 8.25 Hypertension crises secondary to monoamine oxidase inhibitor–tyramine interactions Monoamine oxidase inhibitor therapy Impaired degradation of intracellular amines Ingestion of (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine) tyramine-containing food Accumulation of catecholamines in Hepatic monamine nerve terminal storage granules oxidase inhibition with decreased Increased circulating oxidative metabolism tyramine level of tyramine Massive release of catecholamines Tachyarrhythmias Vasoconstriction (increased systemic vascular resistance) Severe paroxysm of hypertension Hypertensive encephalopathy Acute hypertensive heart failure with pulmonary edema Intracerebral hemorrhage (Fig. 8-21) (Figs. 8-24 and 8-25) FIGURE 8-32 Hypertensive crises secondary to monoamine oxidase inhibitor–tyramine interactions. Severe paroxysmal hypertension complicated by intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypertensive encephalopathy, or acute hypertensive heart failure can occur in patients treated with monoamine oxidase (MOA) inhibitors after ingestion of certain drugs or tyramine- containing foods [48,49]. Because MAO is required for degradation of intracellular amines, including epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine, MAO inhibitors lead to accumulation of catecholamines within storage granules in nerve terminals. The amino acid tyramine is a potent inducer of neurotransmitter release from nerve terminals. As a result of inhibition of hepatic MAO, ingested tyramine escapes oxidative degradation in the liver. In addition, the high circulating levels of tyramine provoke massive catecholamine release from nerve terminals, resulting in vasoconstriction and a paroxysm of severe hypertension. A hyper- adrenergic syndrome resembling pheochromocytoma then ensues. Symptoms include severe pounding headache, flushing or pallor, profuse diaphoresis, nausea, vomiting, and extreme prostration. The mean increase in blood pressure is 55 mm Hg systolic and 30 mm Hg diastolic [49]. The duration of the attacks varies from 10 minutes to 6 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Ofa D1 Dopamine Receptor, Not Linked To
    Br. J. Pharmacol. (1991), 103, 1928-1934 11--" Macmillan Press Ltd, 1991 Identification of a D1 dopamine receptor, not linked to adenylate cyclase, on lactotroph cells 'Danny F. Schoors, *Georges P. Vauquelin, *Hilde De Vos, fGerda Smets, Brigitte Velkeniers, Luc Vanhaelst & Alain G. Dupont Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (V.U.B.), Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium; *Protein Chemistry Laboratory, Instituut voor Moleculaire Biologie, V.U.B., Paardenstraat 65, St-Genesius-Rode, Belgium and tDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Medical School, V.U.B., Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium 1 We studied the lactotroph cells of the rat by both in vivo and in vitro pharmacological techniques for the presence of D1-receptors. Both approaches revealed the presence of a D2-receptor, stimulated by quinpirole (resulting in an inhibition of prolactin secretion) and blocked by domperidone. 2 Administration of fenoldopam, the most selective Dl-receptor agonist currently available, resulted in a dose-dependent decrease of prolactin secretion in vivo (after pretreatment with a-methyl-p-tyrosine) and in vitro (cultured pituitary cells). This increase was dose-dependently blocked by the selective D1-receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, and although the effect of fenoldopam was less than that obtained by D2-receptor stimulation, these data suggest that a D,-receptor also controls prolactin secretion. 3 In order to detect the location of these dopamine receptors, autoradiographic studies were performed by use of [3H]-SCH 23390 and [3H]-spiperone as markers for D1- and D2-receptors, respectively. Specific binding sites for [3H]-SCH 23390 were demonstrated. Fenoldopam dose-dependently reduced [3H]-SCH 23390 binding, but had no effect on [3H]-spiperone binding.
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • LF-117708-01 Hydralazine 20Mg-Ml Injection V7
    Package leaflet: Information for the patient 28055763 syringe, this is called an intravenous injection or; • A restriction of movement in part of the intestine; LF-117708-01 - it may be diluted further and injected very slowly • A deficiency of certain white blood cells which into your vein through a drip (intravenous infusion). can result in fever and ulceration of the mouth The recommended dose is 5 to 10 mg by and throat; intravenous injection, and will be repeated if • An increased number of white blood cells; necessary after 20 to 30 minutes. • Enlargement of the spleen; Hydralazine 20mg Powder for Concentrate for Solution for Injection/Infusion • A reduction in the number of red and white blood Your blood pressure will be taken whilst you cells and platelets in the blood; Hydralazine hydrochloride are receiving treatment and the dose adjusted • Depression; to make sure that you have gradual fall in your Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start • have been told you are a slow acetylator • Seeing or hearing things which are not really blood pressure to normal levels. taking this medicine because it (this means that your body handles some there (hallucinations); contains important information for you medicines more slowly than other people); If you are given more medicine than you should • Inflammation of the nerves which may cause weakness - Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. • suffer from any serious liver or kidney problems; As this medicine is given to you in hospital it is very or numbness especially in your fingers and toes; - If you have any further questions ask your • have blockage of one or more arteries that supply unlikely that an overdose will happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Hydrazines. US Department Of
    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR HYDRAZINES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry September 1997 HYDRAZINES ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. HYDRAZINES iii UPDATE STATEMENT Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary, but no less than once every three years. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE, E-29 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 HYDRAZINES vii CONTRIBUTORS CHEMICAL MANAGER(S)/AUTHOR(S): Gangadhar Choudhary, Ph.D. ATSDR, Division of Toxicology, Atlanta, GA Hugh IIansen, Ph.D. ATSDR, Division of Toxicology, Atlanta, GA Steve Donkin, Ph.D. Sciences International, Inc., Alexandria, VA Mr. Christopher Kirman Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH THE PROFILE HAS UNDERGONE THE FOLLOWING ATSDR INTERNAL REVIEWS: 1 . Green Border Review. Green Border review assures the consistency with ATSDR policy. 2 . Health Effects Review. The Health Effects Review Committee examines the health effects chapter of each profile for consistency and accuracy in interpreting health effects and classifying end points. 3. Minimal Risk Level Review. The Minimal Risk Level Workgroup considers issues relevant to substance-specific minimal risk levels (MRLs), reviews the health effects database of each profile, and makes recommendations for derivation of MRLs. HYDRAZINES ix PEER REVIEW A peer review panel was assembled for hydrazines. The panel consisted of the following members: 1. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Antagonism of Dopamine D2 Receptor/Я-Arrestin 2 Interaction Is a Common Property of Clinically Effective Antipsychotics
    Antagonism of dopamine D2 receptor/␤-arrestin 2 interaction is a common property of clinically effective antipsychotics Bernard Masri, Ali Salahpour, Michael Didriksen*, Valentina Ghisi, Jean-Martin Beaulieu†, Raul R. Gainetdinov‡, and Marc G. Caron§ Departments of Cell Biology, Medicine and Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 Edited by Solomon H. Snyder, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved July 8, 2008 (received for review April 10, 2008) Since the unexpected discovery of the antipsychotic activity of beit with different potency, on the dopamine (DA) system. It has chlorpromazine, a variety of therapeutic agents have been devel- been demonstrated that clinical efficacy of essentially all anti- oped for the treatment of schizophrenia. Despite differences in psychotic drugs (including traditional and newer antipsychotics) their activities at various neurotransmitter systems, all clinically is directly correlated with dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) binding effective antipsychotics share the ability to interact with D2 class affinity and their capacity to antagonize this receptor (5, 6). It dopamine receptors (D2R). D2R mediate their physiological effects is commonly believed that the D2R, which belongs to the G via both G protein-dependent and independent (␤-arrestin 2- protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, mediates the major dependent) signaling, but the role of these D2R-mediated signaling part of its signaling and functions by coupling to Gi/o proteins to events in the actions of antipsychotics remains unclear. We dem- negatively regulate cAMP production. Thus, studies aimed at onstrate here that while different classes of antipsychotics have assessing the efficacy of antipsychotics on D2R signaling have complex pharmacological profiles at G protein-dependent D2R classically been mainly concerned with measuring Gi/o-mediated long isoform (D2LR) signaling, they share the common property of inhibition of cAMP.
    [Show full text]
  • Repeated Quinpirole Treatment Increases Camp-Dependent Protein
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2004) 29, 1823–1830 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/04 $30.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Repeated Quinpirole Treatment Increases cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Activity and CREB Phosphorylation in Nucleus Accumbens and Reverses Quinpirole-Induced Sensorimotor Gating Deficits in Rats 1 1 3 ,1,2 Kerry E Culm , Natasha Lugo-Escobar , Bruce T Hope and Ronald P Hammer Jr* 1 2 Departments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Neuroscience, Anatomy 3 and Psychiatry, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Behavioral Neuroscience Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA Sensorimotor gating, which is severely disrupted in schizophrenic patients, can be measured by assessing prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI). Acute administration of D -like receptor agonists such as quinpirole reduces PPI, but tolerance occurs 2 upon repeated administration. In the present study, PPI in rats was reduced by acute quinpirole (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), but not following repeated quinpirole treatment once daily for 28 days. Repeated quinpirole treatment did not alter the levels of basal-, forskolin- (5 mM), or SKF 82958- (10 mM) stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), but significantly increased cAMP- dependent protein kinase (PKA) activity. Phosphorylation of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) was significantly greater in the NAc after repeated quinpirole treatment than after repeated saline treatment with or without acute quinpirole challenge. Activation of PKA by intra-accumbens infusion of the cAMP analog, Sp-cAMPS, prevented acute quinpirole-induced PPI disruption, similar to the behavioral effect observed following repeated quinpirole treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Repeated Administration of Aripiprazole Produces A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology Psychology, Department of 2015 Repeated administration of aripiprazole produces a sensitization effect in the suppression of avoidance responding and phencyclidine-induced hyperlocomotion and increases D2 receptor- mediated behavioral function Jun Gao University of Nebraska–Lincoln Rongyin Qin University of Nebraska–Lincoln Ming Li University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, and the Health Psychology Commons Gao, Jun; Qin, Rongyin; and Li, Ming, "Repeated administration of aripiprazole produces a sensitization effect in the suppression of avoidance responding and phencyclidine-induced hyperlocomotion and increases D2 receptor-mediated behavioral function" (2015). Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology. 681. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub/681 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Journal of Psychopharmacology 29:4 (2015), pp. 390–400; doi: 10.1177/0269881114565937 Copyright © 2014 Jun Gao, Rongyin Qin, and Ming Li. Published by SAGE Publications. Used by permission. digitalcommons.unl.edudigitalcommons.unl.edu Repeated administration of aripiprazole produces a sensitization effect in the suppression of avoidance responding and phencyclidine-induced hyperlocomotion and increases D2 receptor-mediated behavioral function Jun Gao,1 Rongyin Qin,1,2,3 and Ming Li1 1 Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA 2 Department of Neurology, The Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, PR China 3 Department of Neurology, Changzhou No.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Tariff Schedule 2
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACIDUM LIDADRONICUM 63132-38-7 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACIDUM SALCAPROZICUM 183990-46-7 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIDUM SALCLOBUZICUM 387825-03-8 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABAPERIDONUM 183849-43-6 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABATACEPTUM 332348-12-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABETIMUSUM 167362-48-3 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABRINEURINUM 178535-93-8 ACOLBIFENUM 182167-02-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACOTIAMIDUM 185106-16-5 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9
    [Show full text]