DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting Agenda MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, September 9, 2020 Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, (March 18, 2020), the meeting will only be conducted via video conferencing and by telephone. Please follow the instructions on the following page to join the meeting remotely. COMMISSIONERS Chair – Ben J. Benoit Vice Chair – Jan Harnik Second Vice Chair – V. Manuel Perez Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside, District 1 Waymond Fermon / Oscar Ortiz, City of Indio Karen Spiegel, County of Riverside, District 2 Brian Berkson / Chris Barajas, City of Jurupa Valley Chuck Washington, County of Riverside, District 3 Kathleen Fitzpatrick / Robert Radi, City of La Quinta V. Manuel Perez, County of Riverside, District 4 Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Jeff Hewitt, County of Riverside, District 5 Bill Zimmerman / Dean Deines, City of Menifee Art Welch / Daniela Andrade, City of Banning Yxstain Gutierrez / Carla Thornton, City of Moreno Valley Lloyd White / Julio Martinez, City of Beaumont Scott Vinton / Christi White, City of Murrieta Joseph DeConinck / Johnny Rodriguez, City of Blythe Berwin Hanna / Ted Hoffman, City of Norco Larry Smith / Linda Molina, City of Calimesa Jan Harnik / Kathleen Kelly, City of Palm Desert Randall Bonner / Jeremy Smith, City of Canyon Lake Lisa Middleton / Dennis Woods, City of Palm Springs Raymond Gregory / Mark Carnevale, City of Cathedral City Michael M. Vargas / Rita Rogers, City of Perris Steven Hernandez / Megan Beaman Jacinto, City of Coachella Ted Weill / Charles Townsend, City of Rancho Mirage Wes Speake / Jim Steiner, City of Corona Rusty Bailey / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Andrew Kotyuk / Russ Utz, City of San Jacinto Clint Lorimore / Todd Rigby, City of Eastvale Michael S. Naggar / Maryann Edwards, City of Temecula Linda Krupa / Russ Brown, City of Hemet Ben J. Benoit / Joseph Morabito, City of Wildomar Dana Reed / Kimberly Muzik, City of Indian Wells Mike Beauchamp, Governor’s Appointee Caltrans District 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, September 9, 2020 Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, (March 18, 2020), the meeting will only be conducted via video conferencing and by telephone. Please follow the instructions below to join the meeting remotely. INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION Join Zoom Meeting - from PC, Laptop or Phone https://rctc.zoom.us/s/86076668991 US : +1 669 900 6833 or +1 346 248 7799 Webinar ID: 860 7666 8991 For members of the public wishing to submit comment in connection with the Commission Meeting please email written comments to the Clerk of the Board at [email protected] prior to September 8, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. and your comments will be made part of the official record of the proceedings. Members of the public may also make public comments through their telephone or Zoom connection when recognized by the Chair. In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting on the Commission’s website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, Executive Order N-29-20, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda September 9, 2020 Page 2 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. 4. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS – The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR – All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 5A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – AUGUST 12, 2020 Page 1 5B. QUARTERLY PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT METRICS REPORT, APRIL-JUNE 2020 Page 15 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Public Engagement Metrics Report for April-June 2020. 5C. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Page 23 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on state and federal legislation. 5D. 91 EXPRESS LANES MONTHLY STATUS REPORTS Page 32 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 91 Express Lanes Monthly Reports for three months from April to June 2020. 5E. TOLL OPERATIONS YEAR IN REVIEW AND COVID-19 IMPACTS UPDATE Page 96 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file a presentation providing a review of results from the latest fiscal year of toll operations and an update to the impacts that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on toll operations. Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda September 9, 2020 Page 3 5F. DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL AGREEMENT FOR EXPRESS LANES TOLL ENFORCEMENT Page 117 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 21-31-005-00 with the Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP) for toll enforcement on the express lanes for a five-year term in the amount of $3,611,479; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 5G. RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Page 132 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 21-31-004-00 to Daktronics, Inc. (Daktronics) for the maintenance and repair of the changeable message signs (CMS) for the 91 Express Lanes for a five-year term, in the amount of $148,775, plus a contingency amount of $14,878, for a total amount not to exceed $163,653; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to finalize and execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for the agreement. 5H. RIVERSIDE EXPRESS AAA REWARDS AND DISCOUNTS PROGRAM Page 141 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file a presentation on the Riverside Express AAA Rewards and Discounts program. 5I. FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS Page 151 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Resolution No. 20-014, “Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Approving the FY 2020/21 Project List for the California State of Good Repair Program”; Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda September 9, 2020 Page 4 2) Approve an allocation of $4,211,059 related to Fiscal Year 2020/21 State of Good Repair (SGR) program funds to eligible Riverside County transit operators; 3) Authorize staff to allocate increased SCO revenue estimates up to $421,102, or 10 percent of the current estimate, to eligible Riverside County transit operators; 4) Approve an increase of $258,859 in the FY 2020/21 budget for SGR revenues to reflect updated SCO estimates; 5) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to review, approve and submit projects to Caltrans which are consistent with SGR program guidelines and to execute and submit required documents for the SGR program, including the Authorized Agent Form; and 6) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve administrative amendments to the FY 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for incorporation of the SGR funds, as necessary. 6. APPROVAL OF METROLINK OPERATING AND CAPITAL SUBSIDIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21, RELATED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, AND RCTC SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AMENDMENT Page 156 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file a report on highlights from the Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) services; 2) Approve the Fiscal Year (FY) 2020/21 SCRRA operating and capital budget, which results in an operating subsidy of $23,780,000 and capital subsidy of $7,961,548 for the Commission; 3) Amend the FY 2020/21 RCTC Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to address changes in the funding sources to meet Metrolink’s annual request; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director to finalize and execute Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 20-25-091-01, Amendment No. 1 to MOU No. 20-25-091-00, with SCRRA regarding annual funding, including subrecipient matters related to pass-through of federal funding. Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda September 9, 2020 Page 5 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Los Angeles City Clerk
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM j!; 23 PM 3: 26 OFFICI:ft CITY ADMINWR ATIVE Date: July 22, 2014 To: Honorable Eric Garcetti, Mayor Attention: Mandy Morales, Legislative Coordinator From: Jon Kirk Mukri, General Manager Department of Transportation Subject: RECOMMENDED CONTRACT A A BS FOR THE CONTINUED MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR LADOT BIKE PATH AND TRANSIT FACILITIES SUMMARY The Department of Transportation (LADOT) requests authority to execute contracts with ShelterClean Services, Inc. (incumbent) for the continued provision of management and landscaping / maintenance services for LADOT bike path and transit facilities. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Council, subject to the approval of the Mayor: 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Department of Transportation, to enter into a five-year contract with ShelterClean Services, Inc., for the management and performance of maintenance and landscaping services for eleven (11) City bike path facilities, with a total cost not-to-exceed $3,000,000, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality. 2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Department of Transportation, to enter into a five-year contract with ShelterClean Services, Inc., for the management and performance of maintenance and landscaping services for seven (7) City transit facilities, with a total cost not-to-exceed $2,140,000, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality. DISCUSSION As will be discussed in this section, the request for proposals(RFP) Evaluation Committee ranked the combined Economy of Scale proposal submitted by ShelterClean Services, Inc. as the best and most cost-effective for the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Committee February 7, 2019 Minutes
    REPORT Southern California Association of Governments 900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA 90017 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE MEETING THURSDAY, February 7, 2019 THE FOLLOWING MINUTES ARE A SUMMARY OF ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. A DIGITAL RECORDING OF THE ACTUAL MEETING IS AVAILABLE FOR LISTENING IN SCAG’S OFFICE. The Transportation Committee (TC) met at SCAG, 900 Wilshire Blvd., 17th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017. The meeting was called to order by Chair Curt Hagman, San Bernardino County. A quorum was present. Members Present: Hon. Sean Ashton, Downey District 25 Hon. Kathryn Barger Los Angeles County Hon. Will Berg, Port Hueneme VCOG Hon. Russell Betts, Desert Hot Springs CVAG Hon. Drew Boyles, El Segundo President’s Appointment Hon. Art Brown, Buena Park District 21 Hon. Ross Chun, Aliso Viejo OCTA Hon. Jonathan Curtis, La Cañada‐Flintridge District 36 Hon. Emily Gabel‐Luddy AVCJPA Hon. James Gazeley, Lomita District 39 Hon. Jack Hadjinian, Montebello SGVCOG Hon. Curt Hagman (Chair) San Bernardino County Hon. Steven Hofbauer, Palmdale District 43 Hon. Jim Hyatt, Calimesa District 3 Hon. Mike T. Judge, Simi Valley VCTC Hon. Trish Kelley, Mission Viejo OCCOG Hon. Randon Lane, Murrieta District 5 Hon. Clint Lorimore, Eastvale District 4 Hon. Steve Manos, Lake Elsinore District 63 Hon. Ray Marquez, Chino Hills District 10 Hon. Larry McCallon, Highland SBCTA Hon. Marsha McLean, Santa Clarita District 67 Attachment: Minutes of the Meeting - February 7, 2019 (Minutes TC Meeting, 2019) Hon. Dan Medina, Gardena District 28 Hon. Fred Minagar, Laguna Niguel District 12 Hon. Carol Moore, Laguna Woods OCCOG Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Conditions Report
    Antelope Valley Line Study Appendix I Existing Conditions Report AVL ANTELOPE VALLEY LINE STUDY Contract No. PS-2415-3024-03 APPENDIX 1 Existing Conditions Report Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: Review Copy Date Initials Originator 7/27/18 SM 444 South Flower Street Checker 8/3/18 LF Suite 800 Back Checker 8/7/18 SM Los Angeles, California 90071 Format Checker 8/8/18 SM Approved by 8/8/18 LF August 8, 2018 Contents CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY PURPOSE ......................................................................... 1-1 1.1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 CORRIDOR CONTEXT ........................................................................................... 1-14 1.3 Section 1 Rerefences ............................................................................................... 1-18 2 ANTELOPE VALLEY PHYSICAL AND OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS ..................... 2-1 2.1 EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE CONFIGURATION AND ASSESTS ....................... 2-1 2.2 OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................... 2-7 2.3 ROLLING STOCK ................................................................................................... 2-19 2.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................... 2-21 2.5 REHABILITATION NEEDS ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Transit Advocate
    How to join SO.CA.TA: Yearly dues are $30.00 cates. In all other cases, permission must be ($12.00 low income). Dues are prorated on a secured from the copyright holder. quarterly basis. Disclaimer: The Southern California Transit THE TRANSIT ADVOCATE Submission of materials: ALL materials for the Advocates is not affiliated with any governmental TRANSIT ADVOCATE newsletter go to Andrew agency or transportation provider. Names and Newsletter of the Southern California Transit Advocates Novak at P.O. Box 2383, Downey California 90242 logos of agencies appear for information and or to [email protected]. Please enclose a self reference purposes only. May 2010 Vol. 18, No. 5 ISSN 1525-2892 addressed stamped envelope for returns. SO.CA.TA officers, 2010 Newsletter deadlines are the Fridays a week President: Lionel Jones before SO.CA.TA meetings, at 6:00 PM Pacific Vice President: Charles Hobbs time, unless otherwise announced. Recording Secretary: Kymberleigh Richards Executive Secretary: Dana Gabbard Opinions: Unless clearly marked as "Editorial" or Treasurer: Hank Fung "Position Paper", all written material within, Directors at Large: Ken Ruben including all inserted flyers and postcards, are the J.K. Drummond expressed opinions of the authors and not Nate Zablen necessarily that of the Southern California Transit ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Advocates. Newsletter Editor: Andrew Novak Newsletter Prod. Mgr: Dana Gabbard Copyright: © 2010 Southern California Transit Webmaster: Charles Hobbs Advocates. Permission is freely granted to repro- th th duce/reprint ORIGINAL articles from the Transit NEXT SO.CA.TA MEETINGS : May 15 and June 12 at Angelus Plaza, 4th Floor, 255 S. Hill, Los Angeles Advocate, provided credit is given to both the au- thor and the Southern California Transit Advo- May 2010 — Issue 210 Southern California Transit Advocates 3010 Wilshire #362 Los Angeles, CA 90010 44¢ First 213-388-2364 Class http://www.socata.net Postage [email protected] FIRST CLASS MAIL Inside This Issue: Metrolink cab car 638 is one of the agency’s new • Bulletin Board (pg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sunset Limited? Amtrak’S Line Manager’S Report on the Sunset and Starlight Selden on Competition Arizona Meeting Jackson Hits the Rails President’S Commentary
    ISSN 2325-629X IN THIS ISSUE: 2017 - Make or Break for the Sunset Limited? Amtrak’s Line Manager’s Report on the Sunset and Starlight Selden on Competition Arizona Meeting Jackson Hits the Rails President’s Commentary Photo by Georg Trub STEEL WHEELS / 4TH QUARTER 2016 1 RailPAC is a 501c3 Organization therefore all donations are tax deductible. 2 STEEL WHEELS / 4TH QUARTER 2016 anyway since with an optimum wheel-rail interface you achieve the best ride, the lowest fuel consumption, and the least rail and wheel wear. As for Positive Train Control, installing it on a 43 mile system, effectively President’s closed to other traffic, with a captive fleet of 14 dmus Commentary should not be that hard. The sad thing is that cost overruns and delays lend High Speed Rail ammunition to passenger rail’s many detractors. News came in October This is supposed to be a low cost “starter” system. that the HSR engineers Unfortunately regulations such as mandatory PTC had decided that small is and ADA requirements mean that there is no longer a beautiful. The word is that shorter trains need smaller cheap way to get into the passenger rail business. We stations which fit more easily into built urban areas. A are fortunate to have relatively recent additions such as lot of people could have told them that five or six years Metrolink and ACE. Would they be built under today’s ago before millions were spent on designing half mile regulatory regime? I seriously doubt it. long stations and even longer approach tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • I-5 Freight Corridor Project
    I-5 Freight Corridor Project LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT 7 – LA – 5 (PM 27.0/R67.0) 34210/0717000244 Initial Study with Proposed Negative Declaration / Environmental Assessment Prepared by the State of California Department of Transportation The environmental review, consultation, and any other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by Caltrans pursuant to 23 USC 327 and the Memorandum of Understanding dated December 23, 2016 and executed by FHWA and Caltrans. January 2019 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to: Division 13, Public Resources Code Project Description The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) proposes the I-5 Freight Corridor Improvement Project to improve freight efficiency along Interstate 5 (I-5) from State Route 134 (SR-134) to Templin Highway Undercrossing in Los Angeles County. The project proposes to increase the vertical clearance to 16’-6”, to eliminate load capacity restrictions for heavy loads, and to reduce the frequency of route closures due to maintenance. Determination This proposed Negative Declaration (ND) is included to give notice to interested agencies and the public that it is Caltrans’ intent to adopt a ND for this project. This does not mean that the Caltrans’ decision regarding the project is final. This ND is subject to change based on comments received by interested agencies and the public. Caltrans has prepared an Initial Study for this project, and pending public review, expects to determine from this study that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: The proposed project would have no effect on agriculture and forest resources, mineral resources, and population and housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Antelope Valley Line
    ANTELOPE VALLEY LINE 76.54 LANCASTER STATION 48.67 Burke Rd. Metrolink Valley Sub. 29/29 SIGNAL 48.2”P” /48.1 76.2 CP SIERRA 47.3 SLIDE DETECTOR FENCE 76.05 Ave. J U.P. 406.1 46.85 Pvt. xing 75.04 Ave. K U.P. 407.1 SIGNAL 46.2”P” /46.1 75.0 CP BONITA 75.0 W/B 40 MPH 45.68 Rosmussen Pvt. xing SIGNAL 73.1/73.2 45.42-45.47 TUNNEL #18 266 FT. 34 MPH 6.21.2 73.02 Columbia Way Ave. M U.P.409.1 45.14 Capra Rd. 71.99 Ave. N Pvt. xing Lockheed U.P.410.1 44.97-45.04 TUNNEL #19 328 FT. 34 MPH SIGNAL 71.2/71.1 44.94 HIGH WATER DETECTOR 6.21.2 69.95 Rancho Vista Blvd. Ave. P U.P. 412.2 44.2 CP SOLEDAD “P” W/B only 50 mph t/o 69.32 Sierra Hwy. U.P. 412.8 43.62 Lang Station Rd. SIGNAL 69.2/69.1 SIGNAL 43.1/43.2 43.3/43.4 69.19 PALMDALE STATION 41.6 CP LANG 50 mph t/o 68.40 Palmdale Blvd. U.P. 413.7 41.55 A St. Pvt. Xing 67.92 Ave. R U.P 414.2 67.97 E/B 55 MPH 40.8 DETECTOR DE w/o count talk 40.0 CP HUMPHREYS 25 mph t/o 40.05 W/B 55 MPH 67.55 CP HAROLD 45 mph t/o 65.30 W/B 55 MPH 38.9 E/B 55 MPH 66.91 Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Criteria
    SECTION 3 Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Criteria 3.1 Senate Bill 375 The State of California adopted Senate Bill (SB) 375, the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, to outline growth strategies and better integrate regional land use and transportation planning, which will help the State meet its greenhouse gas reduction mandates. SB 375 requires that the State’s 18 metropolitan planning organizations incorporate a “sustainable communities strategy” with their respective regional transportation plans to achieve their respective region’s greenhouse gas emission reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the metropolitan planning organization that has jurisdiction over the Project Site. For the SCAG region, pursuant to SB 375, CARB set greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets that were updated in 2018 to an 8 percent reduction by 2020 and a 19 percent reduction by 2035 in per capita passenger vehicle GHG emissions, which became effective October 1, 2018.1 On April 7, 2016, SCAG adopted the 2016‐2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS): A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability, and a High Quality of Life. The 2016 RTP/SCS outlines strategies that meet or exceed these targets set by CARB.2 For the SCAG region, CARB gas set greenhouse gas reduction target to eight percent below 2005 per capita emissions levels by 2020, and 13 percent below 2005 per capita emissions levels by 2035. On June 28, 2016, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65080(b)(2)(J)(ii), CARB accepted SCAG’s determination that its 2016 RTP/SCS would, if implemented, achieve CARB’s applicable GHG reduction targets.3 1 California Air Resources Board, SB 375 Regional Plan Climate Targets, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our- work/programs/sustainable-communities-program/regional-plan-targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Schedule Rancho Cucamonga to Union Station
    Metrolink Schedule Rancho Cucamonga To Union Station Sejant Skip redetermined that fibrinolysin headreach wondrously and mitch unfalteringly. When Douggie Germanized his chlorites bedazzled not compassionately enough, is Gerhard graminivorous? Scotti remains scratchy after Tedrick overmatches phlegmatically or suds any deviance. Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga via Ontario Mills Mall. Downtown or use track 1 at Rancho Cucamonga today 52 pm departure. By law, we are required to ask your consent to show the content that is normally displayed here. Thomas was questioned and gave a fake name, but when officers. Installment agreement starts when device is shipped. Get personal shopping recommendations based on the products you own, and track your orders wherever you go. Big boy tour schedule on saturday morning in all. CEO David Solow has been in the spotlight. Metrolink train last night. Right now, light rail trains are the only ones that run through the station. West Colton to Metrolink Rancho Cucamonga Station Parking lot, via charter bus. Good news for commuters. Mission Viejo will stop at Corona North Main due to avoiding a vehicle on the tracks. Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin. Jeep Cherokee on train tracks in Glendale. Bart Reed, the Executive Director of The Transit Coalition, said fare increases would better serve ridership. Metrolink monthly passholders can not receive occasional reader surveys and gave a great day holiday weekend day are responsible for current data powered by signing up? Digest: Lease agreement paves way for No. Lyft can carry up to four passengers and their bags. Metrolink is inviting ticket holders on Monday to bring a guest with them to ride for free.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Committee Agenda - Final September 15, 2016
    Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Los Angeles, CA Agenda - Final Thursday, September 15, 2016 9:00 AM One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, 3rd Floor, Metro Board Room Construction Committee Don Knabe, Chair Diane DuBois, Vice Chair Mike Bonin Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker Sheila Kuehl Carrie Bowen, non-voting member Phillip A. Washington, Chief Executive Officer METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD RULES (ALSO APPLIES TO BOARD COMMITTEES) PUBLIC INPUT A member of the public may address the Board on agenda items, before or during the Board or Committee’s consideration of the item for one (1) minute per item, or at the discretion of the Chair. A request to address the Board should be submitted in person at the meeting to the Board Secretary. Individuals requesting to speak on more than three (3) agenda items will be allowed to speak up to a maximum of three (3) minutes per meeting. For individuals requiring translation service, time allowed will be doubled. The public may also address the Board on non-agenda items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board during the public comment period, which will be held at the beginning and/or end of each meeting. Each person will be allowed to speak for up to three (3) minutes per meeting and may speak no more than once during the Public Comment period. Speakers will be called according to the order in which the speaker request forms are received. Elected officials, not their staff or deputies, may be called out of order and prior to the Board’s consideration of the relevant item.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Communities Environmental Analysis
    SECTION 6 Sustainable Communities Environmental Analysis The following discussion provides responses to each of the questions set forth in the City of Los Angeles Initial Study Checklist as adjusted for use as a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21155.2(b) and 21159.28. This analysis assumes all applicable mitigation measures (MMs) from the RTP/SCS are incorporated. Where applicable, project specific project design features (PDFs) and/or MMs are identified in the analysis to help reduce or avoid significant impacts on the environment. 6.1 Aesthetics On September 27, 2013, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill (SB) 743, which became effective on January 1, 2014. The purpose of SB 743 is to streamline the review under CEQA for several categories of development projects including the development of infill projects in transit priority areas (TPAs). Public Resources Code Section 21099 (a)(7) defines a TPA as an area located within 0.5 miles (2,640 feet) of a major transit stop that is “existing or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Program adopted pursuant to Section 450.216 or 450.322 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations.” As defined in Public Resources Code Section 21064.3, a major transit stop is a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.1 PRC Section 21099(d)(1) states that a project’s aesthetic impacts shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment if: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Committee December 7, 2017 Minutes
    REPORT Southern California Association of Governments 900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA 90017 TC Agenda Item No. 1 February, 1, 2018 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE MEETING THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2017 THE FOLLOWING MINUTES ARE A SUMMARY OF ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. A DIGITAL RECORDING OF THE ACTUAL MEETING IS AVAILABLE FOR LISTENING IN SCAG’S OFFICE. The Transportation Committee (TC) met at SCAG, 818 W. 7TH Street, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017. The meeting was called to order by Chair Hon. Curt Hagman, San Bernardino County. A quorum was present. Members Present: Hon. Sean Ashton, Downey District 25 Hon. Rusty Bailey, Riverside District 68 Hon. Glen Becerra, Simi Valley District 46 Hon. Ben Benoit, Wildomar South Coast AQMD Hon. Will Berg, Port Hueneme VCOG Hon. Russell Betts, Desert Hot Springs CVAG Hon. Art Brown, Buena Park District 21 Hon. Joe Buscaino, Los Angeles District 62 Hon. Ross Chun, Aliso Viejo OCTA Hon. Jim Clarke, Culver City WCCOG Hon. Emily Gabel‐Luddy AVCJPA Hon. James Gazeley, Lomita District 39 Hon. Jeffrey, Giba, Moreno Valley District 69 Hon. Jack Hadjinian, Montebello SGVCOG Hon. Curt Hagman (Chair) San Bernardino County Hon. Carol Herrera, Diamond Bar District 37 Hon. Steven Hofbauer, Palmdale District 43 Hon. Jim Hyatt, Calimesa District 3 Hon. Mike T. Judge, Simi Valley VCTC Hon. Randon Lane, Murrieta (Vice Chair) District 5 Hon. Steve Manos, Lake Elsinore District 63 Hon. Dan Medina, Gardena District 28 Hon. Richard D. Murphy, Los Alamitos OCTA Hon. Frank Navarro, Colton District 6 Hon. Pam O’Connor, Santa Monica District 41 Hon.
    [Show full text]