Chapter 5: Economic Conditions A. INTRODUCTION and METHODOLOGY B. BACKGROUND HISTORY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 5: Economic Conditions A. INTRODUCTION and METHODOLOGY B. BACKGROUND HISTORY Chapter 5: Economic Conditions A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY The TSM Alternative and Build Alternatives 1 and 2 would result in a variety of transportation improvements that may affect economic activity in the primary study area. In addition, subway improvements proposed in Build Alternatives 1 and 2 may also affect the secondary area, West Midtown. This chapter examines economic conditions in the study areas, focusing on employ- ment and commercial development. An overview of employment trends in the city is provided as background to a detailed analysis of existing employment by type within zones and neighbor- hoods in the primary and secondary MESA study area (see page 3-1 and Figure 3-1 in Chapter 3, “Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy,” for the study area boundaries). In addition, major em- ployers or industries that dominate or characterize the neighborhoods are identified. Following that analysis of existing conditions, changes to employment predicted to occur as part of the future background conditions are analyzed. Finally, each of the four alternatives are analyzed for potential economic impacts, including impacts related to regional and/or local economic conditions, such as development, tax revenues and public expenditures, employment opportuni- ties, accessibility, retail sales, the economic vitality of existing businesses, and the effect of a proposed project on established business districts. This chapter assesses the potential impacts on economic conditions that may occur as a result of the operation of each project alternative. Impacts on economic conditions during constrution are documented in Chapter 15, “Construction and Construction Impacts.” Sources for this analysis include employment figures from the U.S. Department of Labor and the 1990 Census of Population and Housing, as well as information on land use and land use trends and on population and housing gathered for Chapters 3 and 4 of this document. These were supplemented by field surveys conducted in fall of 1997. B. BACKGROUND HISTORY Changes in the economy of Manhattan over the past several decades provide a useful context for understanding existing and probable future conditions. In the past three decades, Manhattan’s employment base has been relatively stable at slightly more than 2 million jobs, but its composition has changed dramatically. Manufacturing has declined steadily during the period —most notably apparel manufacturing, once so vital in the midtown Garment Center. Largely offsetting this decrease, nonmanufacturing sectors—in particular, office jobs in the service and finance, insurance, and real estate (FIRE) sectors—have shown the largest increases over time and spurred heavy office construction in the 1980's. Figure 5-1 summarizes the principal Manhattan employment trends from 1960 to 1997, and Table 5-1 summarizes the data for the same period. As shown in the figure and table, manufacturing 5-1 Manhattan East Side Transit Alternatives MIS/DEIS Table 5-1 Summary of Employment Trends in Manhattan, 1960 to 1997 Finance, Total Insurance, Private Public Year Manufacturing & R. E. Service(1) Retail Sector(2) Sector Total 1960 525,400 304,600 392,400 243,900 1,968,200 (3) (3) 1965 465,300 319,600 420,100 231,000 1,908,600 (3) (3) 1970 413,700 389,300 494,700 223,500 1,980,300 (3) (3) 1975 293,700 353,900 506,500 185,200 1,702,300 (3) (3) 1980 276,400 385,800 601,000 187,100 1,805,100 399,900 2,205,100 1985 226,900 444,200 678,100 203,300 1,884,000 436,400 2,320,400 1990 186,600 449,800 736,000 196,600 1,857,700 485,000 2,342,700 1995 152,900 400,700 704,000 184,600 1,685,700 418,200 2,103,900 1997(4) 146,800 395,200 758,500 195,400 1,735,800 426,800 2,162,600 Notes: All figures have been rounded; amounts are for persons covered by unemployment insurance; all figures except for 1997 are average annual amounts. (1) Service sector employment figures prior to 1972 have been adjusted to reflect consistency in the coverage of service sector employees. (2) Includes categories not shown separately. (3) Local government workers were not covered prior to 1978, so public sector and total amounts are not comparable with those for subsequent years. (4) As of first quarter 1997. Source: New York State Department of Labor. employment during the period declined steadily from more than 525,000 jobs in 1960 to fewer than 147,000 in 1997, a decline of 72 percent. Service employment increased steadily from about 392,000 in 1960 until the recession in the early 1990's, and has increased steadily again since then, equaling 758,500, or 43.7 percent of Manhattan’s private sector employment in the first quarter of 1997. FIRE employment increased dramatically beginning in the mid-1960's, peaked at about 480,000 in the late 1980's, and then—after the stock market decline in 1987—has been mildly declining. Retail trade, which represents about 11 percent of Manhattan’s private sector employment, has experienced stretches of small increases and decreases, declining from 1960 until just before 1980, increasing from 1980 to 1986, decreasing from 1986 to the early 1990's, and increasing recently to more than 195,000 jobs. As a result of the interacting of these trends, overall private sector employment in Manhattan peaked at a little more than 2.0 million in the late 1960's (1969), declined to 1.7 million in the mid- 1970's (1977), increased again to more than 1.9 million in the late 1980's (1987 and 1988), de- clined to less than 1.7 million in the recession of the early 1990's, and is increasing again in the mid-1990's. Throughout the period for which figures are available, public sector employment has also been an important component of employment in Manhattan. (All figures are from the New York State Department of Labor.) Corresponding to these shifts in the types of employment in Manhattan have been shifts in the location of employment. Historically, this began with the movement away from the Manhattan waterfront (similar to the movement of employment away from the waterfront in other areas, 5-2 Chapter 5: Economic Conditions such as Brooklyn and older suburbs, such as Yonkers and Mount Vernon). Reductions in manu- facturing and warehousing also altered the functions of older area, such as Tribeca and Soho, and decreased the intensity of the garment center as an employment location. Other historically important employment centers, such as Wall Street and the financial district, retained their im- portance throughout the period. Increases in employment occurred primarily at sites for new office locations, such as Battery Park City and previously vacant or underdeveloped sites in Midtown and Lower Manhattan. C. EXISTING CONDITIONS REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE The New York region was more affected by the economic downturn that followed the stock market decline in 1987 than was the national economy. This region, as defined by the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC), is a 31-county area that includes New York City and the surrounding counties in New Jersey, Connecticut, and New York State. Between 1990 and 1992, the region lost about 496,000 jobs, or 4.6 percent of its total. By 1995, however, the region contained about 10.5 million jobs, gaining back after 1992 about 305,000 jobs, or 3.0 percent of its total. Both the region and its center, Manhattan, have continued to experience em- ployment growth since 1995. Regional trends that affected Manhattan in the mid- to late-1980's included firms moving “back- office” operations to nearby New Jersey locations and the outer boroughs (especially Brooklyn) when Manhattan rents were high. This trend decreased in the subsequent period when Manhat- tan’s employment fell, vacancies increased (particularly in Lower Manhattan), and rents were scaled back. Other regional economic trends include the continued development of suburban of- fice space as a separate market from Manhattan within the region, most notably in Westchester and Nassau Counties, New York, and Fairfield County, Connecticut. These markets ex- perienced the same downturn during the early 1990's as the remainder of the region. Other major regional trends include retail development in areas adjacent to New York City, in particular regional shopping centers in Westchester and Nassau Counties, New York, and Bergen and Hudson Counties, New Jersey. As the center of the region, Manhattan has continued to be its dominant employment concentra- tion. Table 5-2 summarizes recent employment trends in Manhattan. Since 1990, manufacturing employment has continued to decline. FIRE employment, after its dramatic loss following the 1987 stock market decline, has experienced relatively minor decreases since 1992. Service em- ployment, after adjusting to the downturn in the early 1990's, has continued to grow dramatically, with the most recent figures the highest ever recorded in Manhattan. Retail trade has also con- tinued to grow since 1992. As a result, Manhattan’s private sector employment and total em- ployment have gained back much of the loss of the early 1990's and have continued to grow in the most recent period. 5-3 Manhattan East Side Transit Alternatives MIS/DEIS ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN THE STUDY AREA OVERVIEW Economic activity in the primary study area is quite varied, both in type and density. Lower Manhattan is well known as the financial center of the world and the governmental center of New York City. The Lower East Side is primarily residential, but its immigrant populations and ethnic character have traditionally provided support for the garment industry, as well as an at- traction for visitors. East Midtown is a giant economic engine that provides more than ½ million jobs.
Recommended publications
  • UPPER WEST SIDE | the BRONX | ORWASHERS.COM Oven Artisans Inc
    ABOUT US: Orwashers is a New York City institution. Founded in 1916, the bakery began as a small storefront on the Upper East Side. Orwashers was born out of a desire to serve the local community while focusing on high quality rye, black and grain breads reflecting Eastern European tradition. Keith Cohen purchased Orwashers in 2008. Keith and his team have worked hard to respect the brand's rich history while incorporating a distinctly current point of view to satisfy today’s palates. RETAIL BREAD ENTHUSIAST: We are seeking applicants who are outgoing, enthusiastic and flexible. We have a team-oriented work environment at our busy Manhattan retail locations and need individuals who are motivated to exceed sales goals and to educate customers about our high-quality products. ABOUT YOU: Punctual and dependable Friendly, personable and outstanding customer service skills Financially accountable Willingness to multitask and get the job done Love bread, local foods and have a strong sense of community? Even better! ABOUT THE SCHEDULE: 6am to 2pm shifts and/or 1pm to 8pm shifts, 3-4 days a week. Must be available to work weekends. Preference given to applicants with flexible schedules. Part-time opportunities are available. HOW TO APPLY: Send over a resume and a brief note to convince us you should be on our team. Write to [email protected] with “Retail Bread Enthusiast” in the subject line. No attachments please, just paste your resume and note into an email. UPPER EAST SIDE | UPPER WEST SIDE | THE BRONX | ORWASHERS.COM Oven Artisans Inc .
    [Show full text]
  • New York City T R a V E L G U I D E
    NEW YORK CITY T R A V E L G U I D E Empire State Building Rockefeller Center/Top of the Rock Times Square Flatiron Building Washington Square Park Grand Central Terminal Statue of Liberty Ellis Island One World Trade Center 9/11 Memorial Central Park Brooklyn Bridge Hudson River Park Chrysler Building The High Line Brooklyn Heights Promenade New York Public Library Coney Island Broadway & Theatre District Dumbo SoHo: Greene Street Fifth Avenue Upper East Side: Park Avenue & Lexington Avenue Columbus Circle Herald Square Century 21 NEW YORK CITY T R A V E L G U I D E Top of the Rock Observatory Broadway Show Coney Island Yankee Stadium Sight Seeing Cruise Staten Island Ferry Roosevelt Island Tramway Madame Tussauds Radio City Music Hall Museum of Modern Art The MET Madison Square Garden Liberty Helicopter Ride Breakfast at Tiffany’s Blue Box Cafe Coffee & Macroon’s at Ladurée Sightseeing Cruise around Manhattan Top of the Rock Observatory Deck Empire State Building Observatory Deck One World Trade Center Observatory Deck Visit the 9/11 Memorial Eat Italian Food inLittle Italy Eat Chinese Food in Chinatown Carriage ride in Central Park See a Broadway show Find a Rooftop Bar Explore Brooklyn NEW YORK CITY T R A V E L G U I D E Carmine’s Italian Restaurant | Midtown Pietro Nolita | Nolita Black Tap Burgers | Midtown Pizza Beach | Upper East Side TAO | Uptown Stardust Diner| Midtown Gelso & Grand | Little Italy While We Were Young | Chelsea Citizens of Chelsea | Chelsea The River Cafe | Brooklyn/DUMBO Celestine| Brooklyn/DUMBO The Crown Rooftop | Chinatown Refinery Roofop | NYC 230 Fifth Rooftop Igloo Bar | Midtown Chinese Tuxedo | Chinatown Da Nico Ristorante | Little Italy Roberta’s Pizza | Midtown Seamore’s | Nolita Cafe Henrie | Nolita NOMO Kitchen | SoHo Laduree | Upper East Side or SoHo Milk Bar | Midtown or SoHo (all over) Serendipity 3 | Midtown Dominique Ansel Bakery | SoHo Max Brenner Chocolate Bar | Greenwich Village Sugar Factory | Midtown Milk & Cream Cereal Bar | SoHo .
    [Show full text]
  • A Map of Free Meals in Manhattan
    washington heights / inwood north of 155 st breakfast lunch dinner ARC XVI Fort Washington m–f 12–1 pm 1 4111 BROADWAY Senior Center $2 ENTER 174th ST (A 175 ST) 2 ARC XVI Inwood Senior Center m–f 8:30– m–f 12–1 p m 84 VERMILYEA AVE (A DYCKMAN ST) 9:30 am $1 $1.50 Church on the Hill Older Adults 3 Luncheon Club 2005 AMSTERDAM AVE m–f 1 p m A map of free meals in Manhattan (C 163 ST AMSTERDAM AVE) $1.50 W 215 ST m–f 9– m–f 12–1:30 washington 4 Dyckman Senior Center heights & 3754 TENTH AVE (1 DYCKMAN ST) 10:30 am 50¢ pm $1 BROADWAY inwood Harry & Jeanette Weinberg m–f, su map key symbols key 5 Senior Center 54 NAGLE AVE 12–1 pm (1 DYCKMAN ST) $1.50 2 TENTH AVE SEAMEN AVE Moriah Older Adult Luncheon m-th 1:15–2 pm All welcome Mobile kitchen Residents only 204 ST 11 — 207 ST 6 f 11:45–12:15 pm Club 90 BENNETT AVE (A 181 ST) $1.50 — 205 ST Brown bag meal Only HIV positive 4 Riverstone Senior Center m–f 12–1 Senior Citizens — 203 ST 7 99 FORT WASHINGTON AVE (1 ,A,C 168 ST) pm $1.50 VERMILYEA SHERMANAVE AVE AVE POST AVE — 201 ST m–f m–f 12–1 pm Must attend Women only 8 STAR Senior Center 650 W 187th ST (1 191 ST) 9 a m $1.50 Under 21 services ELLWOOD ST NINTH NAGLE AVE UBA Mary McLeod Bethune Senior m–f 9 am m–f 12–1 pm 9 Center 1970 AMSTERDAM AVE ( 1 157 ST) 50¢ $1 HIV Positive Kosher meals 5 Bethel Holy Church 10 tu 1–2 pm 12 PM 922 SAINT NICHOLAS AVE (C 155 ST) Women Must call ahead to register The Love Kitchen m–f 4:30– BROADWAY 11 3816 NINTH AVE (1 207 ST) 6:30 pm W 191 ST Residents AVE BENNETT North Presbyterian Church sa 12–2 pm 8 W 189 ST 12 525 W 155th ST (1 157 ST) 6 W 187 ST W 186 ST W 185 ST east harlem W 184 ST 110 st & north, fifth ave–east river breakfast lunch dinner harlem / morningside heights ST AVE NICHOLAS W 183 ST 110 155 Corsi Senior Center m–f 12– st– st; fifth ave–hudson river breakfast lunch dinner 63 W 181 ST 307 E 116th ST ( 6 116 ST) 1 pm $1.50 WADSWORTH AVE WADSWORTH 13 Canaan Senior Service Center m–f W 180 ST W 179 ST James Weldon Johnson Senior m–f 12– 10 LENOX AVE (2 ,3 CENTRAL PARK NO.
    [Show full text]
  • View from the Street Neighborhood Overview: Manhattan
    EASTERN CONSOLIDATED VIEW FROM THE STREET NEIGHBORHOOD OVERVIEW: MANHATTAN APRIL 2017 EASTERN CONSOLIDATED www.easternconsolidated.com VIEW FROM THE STREET NEIGHBORHOOD OVERVIEW: MANHATTAN OVERVIEW Dear Friends: Of the international investors, Chinese While asking rents for retail space on firms increased their acquisitions of major Manhattan corridors such as Fifth We are pleased to introduce the Manhattan properties to $6.5 billion in Avenue, Madison Avenue, East 57th inaugural issue of View from the Street, 2016, up from $4.7 billion in 2015. The Street, West 34th Street, and Times Eastern Consolidated’s research report most significant transactions included Square can reach up to $4,500 per on neighborhoods in core Manhattan, China Life’s investment in 1285 Avenue square foot, our analysis shows that which will provide you with a snapshot of the Americas, which traded for there are dozens of blocks in prime of recent investment property sales, $1.65 billion in May 2016, and China neighborhoods where entrepreneurial average residential rents, and average Investment Corporation’s investment in retailers can and do rent retail space for retail rents. 1221 Avenue of the Americas, in which under $200 per square foot. partial interest traded for $1.03 billion in As is historically the case in Manhattan, December 2016. Our review of residential rents shows neighborhoods with significant office that asking rents for two-bedroom buildings such as Midtown West, Investor interest in cash-flowing multifamily apartments are ranging from a low of Midtown East, and Nomad/Flatiron properties remained steady throughout $3,727 on the Lower East Side up to recorded the highest dollar volume 2016, with nearly 60 percent of these $9,370 in Tribeca.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Condo Market Report
    ® Manhattan Condo Market Report February 2015 by the numbers +0.7% Surge in February pending sales StreetEasy Condo Price Index (Month-over- pushes condo inventory to Month) record low +0.6% s freezing temperatures and ice pounded of condo units in Midtown increased by 10.5 StreetEasy Condo the New York region in February, the percent. Price Forecast (Month- Manhattan condo market continued a over-Month) A 4-month decline in total units available during Condo prices in the Downtown submarket the peak of winter’s chill. Total inventory continue to be the highest at 12.1 percent declined 2.4 percent from January and ended above the Manhattan-wide level. According to -2.4% the month 5.4 percent below last year’s level. the StreetEasy Condo Price Forecast, condo Inventory (Month-over- It has been a steady downward slide for prices are expected to grow by 3.9 percent in Month) Manhattan condo inventory since the market 2015 – signifcantly less than the 2014 growth experienced its peak level in June 2009. Since rate (7.1 percent) and the robust growth rate of then, the number of units available on the 2013 (16.6 percent). market has fallen by 56.1 percent to the lowest +27.5% level recorded by StreetEasy. It is typical to Pending sales activity defed the cold weather see seasonal boosts to inventory during the Pending Sales Volume in February. Monthly sales volume surged busy spring months, but none of these annual (Month-over-Month) 27.5 percent over the course of the month, boosts have resulted in a long-term increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Market Report
    RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT September 8th – October 9th Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Battery Park Condo Contingent $519,000.00 $550,000 $545,000 -5.0% 0.9% Battery Park Condo Contingent $456,800.00 $456,800 $434,000 5.0% 5.0% Non- Battery Park Condo $850,000.00 $799,000 $780,000 8.2% 2.4% Contingent Battery Park Condo Contingent $550,000.00 $525,000 $525,000 4.5% 0.0% Battery Park Condo All Cash $725,000.00 $725,000 $642,500 11.4% 11.4% Chelsea Condo Contingent $1,850,000.00 $1,850,000 $1,787,000 3.4% 3.4% Chelsea Coop Contingent $1,200,000 $1,100,000.00 $950,000 20.8% 13.6% Non- East Village Condo $1,750,000.00 $1,750,000 $1,750,000 0.0% 0.0% Contingent East Village Coop Contingent $425,000.00 $425,000 $412,000 3.1% 3.1% East Village Coop Contingent $1,095,000 $1,095,000.00 $1,115,000 -1.8% -1.8% Gramercy Park Coop Contingent $1,250,000.00 $1,195,000 $1,170,000 6.4% 2.1% Gramercy Park Condo All Cash $1,250,000 $1,250,000.00 $1,200,000 4.0% 4.0% Greenwich Village Coop All Cash $1,950,000.00 $1,950,000 $1,800,000 7.7% 7.7% Greenwich Village Coop Contingent $1,600,000.00 $1,450,000 $1,350,000 15.6% 6.9% Greenwich Village Coop Contingent $1,495,000 $1,375,000.00 $1,257,500 15.9% 8.5% PAGE 1 RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT September 8th – October 9th Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Non- Greenwich
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Sims East Harlem
    1 Sims East Harlem: An Inquiry into Development Madeleine Sims Urban Studies Senior Thesis Dr. Mark Naison ​ ​ 2 Sims Prologue th Stepping from the 125 ​ street Metro North stop onto the street below, one isn’t awestruck ​ by poverty and grit, instead they are presented with chain stores and a bustling movement of people, trying to get to the subway or Metro North stations or finagling a way into the stores. ​ East Harlem has been in the midst of a commercial and residential development process for the past 22 years involving federal, local, and private investment. East Harlem was not always like ​ ​ this, nor is it like this in the rest of the neighborhood. East Harlem has been notably resistant to ​ ​ the pressures of gentrification. East Harlem has a history similar to that of many poor ​ ​ neighborhoods in New York City but what is at work in today in El Barrio can be understood as the future of New York City, the spread of the supply and demand game among the wealthier residents of the city. Before delving into the role of development in the neighborhood today, we ​ ​ need to understand the demographic history of El Barrio, focusing on the role of community organizations, private and governmental investment, and most importantly the role of housing markets in NYC. ​ 3 Sims Chapter 1: The Evolution of East Harlem Introduction th rd East Harlem is the neighborhood between 96 ​ and 143 ​ streets, sandwiched in between ​ ​ th 1 5 ​ avenue and FDR drive, bordered by Central Park, Harlem, and the Upper East Side.
    [Show full text]
  • East Harlem DISTRICT Including East Harlem, Randalls Island and Wards Island 11
    MANHATTAN COMMUNITY East Harlem DISTRICT Including East Harlem, Randalls Island and Wards Island 11 Health is closely tied to our daily environment. Understanding how our neighborhood affects our physical and mental health is the first step toward building a healthier and more equitable New York City. COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFILES 2018 COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFILES 2018: EAST HARLEM 1 R E V I R 5 AV M E Who We Are L R A H NewNew YorkYork CityCity5 AV NYC population by race E 96 ST NYC population by race PAGE 2 EAST RIVER PAGE 6 PAGE 2 New York City Population by race Black PAGENew 2 York City PAGEEast 2Black Harlem PAGEElementary 6 School Abseentee On time high school graduation 100.0 100.0 Black BlackLatino POPULATION87.5 NYC population by race 87.5 PopulationLatino by race Elementary School Abseentee On time high school graduation 100.075.0 75.0 100 BY RACE AND 100.0 90 62.587.5 PAGE 2 62.5 PAGELatino 2 50% LatinoOther PAGE 6 ETHNICITY^ 50.075.0 87.550.0 Other 37.562.5 29% 32% 75.037.5 Black Population30% by race Black Asian 90 100 22% 62.5 Other Other Elementary School Abseentee On time high school graduation 25.050.0 100.0 15% 25.0 Asian 50% 100.0 12% 75 12.537.5 87.5 29% 32% 50.012.5 Latino 6% Latino New York75.0 City22% 2% 87.5 2% White 25.00.0 37.5 Asian30% Asian 60 62.5 15% 0.0 75.0 White 25.0 90 100 12.5 50.0 Asian Black Latino White Other2% Other62.5 Asian Black Latino50% White12% Other Other 75 0.0 37.5 29% 32% 12.5 50.0 6%White White 22% 37.5 2% 60 50 NYC population by race 25.0 Asian15% Black Latino White Other 0.0 Asian 30% Asian
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkville Promenade on Second Avenue Massengale & Co LLC • Dover, Kohl & Partners • H
    Yorkville Promenade on Second Avenue Massengale & Co LLC • Dover, Kohl & Partners • H. Zeke Mermell The “Before” view of the Promenade looking South NYC DOT design for Second Ave with green bike on Second Avenue from 86th Street lanes and red bus lanes (hidden by bus) OR SO MANY REASONS, we must reduce auto use in WEST OF THIRD AVENUE ON THE UPPER EAST SIDE, F New York City. Studies for Mayor Bloomberg showed the introduction of Madison and Lexington Avenues into that living on a high-traffic avenue in Manhattan is un- the normal city grid produced shorter blocks that made healthy, particularly for our children. To add insult to the grid more interesting for pedestrians and thereby injury, 80% of Manhattan residents do not own cars, and increased the value of the real estate. only 20% of our out-of-town commuters drive to work. Our ugly, unhealthy avenues are more for the benefit of Yorkville’s longer blocks are less pedestrian-friendly, and others than Manhattan’s workers and residents. Second and Third Avenues both used to have that New Section through through the proposed Second Avenue Promenade York oxymoron–the elevated subway–depressing real Most Manhattanites live in small apartments and spend estate values and building quality for decades. In recent a lot of time in public life. When the weather is nice, we decades the area has boomed, and the Yorkville Prom- spend lots of money to dine next to places designers enade will give it a linear neighborhood center unique call “auto sewers”: noisy, smelly streets made to move Yorkville Promenade on Second Avenue in New York City, drawing from both the neighborhood cars quickly, with wide, one-way lanes and no parking Massengale & Co LLC • Dover, Kohl & Partners • H.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Market Report
    RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT November 10th – December 14th Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Battery Park Condo Contingent $699,000.00 $699,000 $650,000 7.0% 7.0% Battery Park Condo Contingent $699,000.00 $699,000 $655,000 6.3% 6.3% Battery Park Condo Contingent $475,000.00 $450,000 $433,000 8.8% 3.8% Chelsea Co Op Contingent $2,795,000 $2,495,000 $2,495,000 10.7% 0.0% Chelsea Co Op Contingent $1,599,000 $2,800,000 $2,450,000 -53.2% 12.5% Chelsea Co Op Contingent $2,795,000 $2,495,000 $2,595,000 7.2% -4.0% Chelsea Condo Contingent $739,000 $739,000 $708,000 4.2% 4.2% Chelsea Condo All Cash $765,000.00 $619,000.00 $623,000.00 18.6% -0.6% Chelsea Co Op Contingent 1,475,000 1,475,000.00 1,425,000.00 3.4% 3.4% East Village Condo All Cash $1,750,000.00 $1,200,000 $1,125,000 35.7% 6.3% East Village Co Op All Cash $1,195,000 $999,000.00 $999,000 16.4% 0.0% East Village Co Op Contingent $1,349,000.00 $1,195,000 $1,175,000 12.9% 1.7% East Village Condo Contingent $2,995,000.00 $2,395,000 $2,270,000 24.2% 5.2% Financial District Condo Contingent $1,250,000.00 $1,100,000 $999,000 20.1% 9.2% Financial District Condo All Cash $875,000.00 $795,000 $733,000 16.2% 7.8% PAGE 1 RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT November 10th – December 14th Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Financial District Condo All Cash $899,000
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Market Report
    RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT January 2021 Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Co Op Alphabet City Contingent $495,000.00 $495,000.00 $465,000.00 6.1% 6.1% Purchase New Chelsea Dev/Sponsor Non-Contingent $4,495,000.00 $4,495,000.00 $3,725,000.00 17.1% 17.1% Purchase Condo Chelsea All Cash $2,300,000.00 $2,300,000.00 $2,137,500.00 7.1% 7.1% Purchase Co Op Chelsea Contingent $1,400,000.00 $1,295,000.00 $1,115,000.00 20.4% 13.9% Purchase Chelsea Condo Sale All Cash $1,350,000.00 $1,250,000.00 $1,150,000.00 14.8% 8.0% Chelsea Co Op Sale Contingent $1,450,000.00 $1,450,000.00 $1,360,000.00 6.2% 6.2% Co Op Chelsea Contingent $650,000.00 $650,000.00 $658,000.00 -1.2% -1.2% Purchase East Village Co Op Sale All Cash $2,495,000.00 $2,495,000.00 $2,300,000.00 7.8% 7.8% Co Op East Village Contingent $535,000.00 $515,000.00 $495,000.00 7.5% 3.9% Purchase East Village Condo Sale Contingent $2,275,000.00 $2,275,000.00 $2,192,500.00 3.6% 3.6% Financial District Co Op Sale All Cash $1,000,000.00 $900,000.00 $805,000.00 19.5% 10.6% Financial District Co Op Sale All Cash $1,100,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $950,000.00 13.6% 5.0% Financial District Condo Sale All Cash $1,075,000.00 $999,999.00 $965,000.00 10.2% 3.5% Co Op Flat Iron All Cash $4,500,000.00 $4,500,000.00 $3,957,000.00 12.1% 12.1% Purchase Flat Iron Condo Sale Contingent $4,295,999.00 $3,995,000.00 $3,785,000.00 11.9% 5.3% PAGE 1 RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT January 2021 Manhattan Discount
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Community District 8: UPPER EAST SIDE (Including Carnegie Hill, Lenox Hill, Roosevelt Island, Upper East Side and Yorkville)
    COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFILES 2015 Manhattan Community District 8: UPPER EAST SIDE (Including Carnegie Hill, Lenox Hill, Roosevelt Island, Upper East Side and Yorkville) Health is rooted in the circumstances of our daily lives and the environments in which we are born, grow, play, work, love and age. Understanding how community conditions affect our physical and mental health is the first step toward building a healthier New York City. UPPER EAST SIDE TOTAL POPULATION WHO WE ARE 226,640 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 POPULATION BY RACE AND ETHNICITY 79% White* 9% Asian* 7% Hispanic 3% Black* 2% Other* POPULATION BY AGE HAVE LIMITED 38% ENGLISH NYC 23% PROFICIENCY 24% 18% 14% NYC ARE 6% 0–17 18–245% 25–44 45–64 65+ FOREIGN 0 - 17 18-24 25-44 45-64 65+ BORN PERCENT WHO REPORTED THEIR OWN HEALTH AS “EXCELLENT,” LIFE EXPECTANCY ”VERY GOOD” OR “GOOD” 85.0 92% YEARS * Non-Hispanic Note: Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding Sources: Overall population, race and age: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates, 2013; Foreign born and English proficiency: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2011-2013; Self-reported health: NYC DOHMH Community Health Survey, COMMUNITY2011-2013; Life Expectancy: HEALTH NYC DOHMH PROFILESBureau of Vital Statistics, 2015: 2003-2012 UPPER EAST SIDE 2 Note from Dr. Mary Bassett, Commissioner, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene New York City is a city of neighborhoods. Their diversity, rich history and people are what make this city so special. But longstanding and rising income inequality, combined with a history of racial residential segregation, has led to startling health inequities between neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]