The Diurnal Cycle of Outgoing Longwave Radiation from Earth Radiation Budget Experiment Measurements
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VOL. 60, NO.13 JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES 1JULY 2003 The Diurnal Cycle of Outgoing Longwave Radiation from Earth Radiation Budget Experiment Measurements G. LOUIS SMITH Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia DAVID A. RUTAN Analytical Services and Materials, Inc., Hampton, Virginia (Manuscript received 8 April 2002, in ®nal form 23 January 2003) ABSTRACT The diurnal cycle of outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) from the earth is analyzed by decomposing satellite observations into a set of empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs). The observations are from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) scanning radiometer aboard the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite, which had a precessing orbit with 578 inclination. The diurnal cycles of land and ocean differ considerably. The ®rst EOF for land accounts for 73% to 85% of the variance, whereas the ®rst EOF for ocean accounts for only 16% to 20% of the variance, depending on season. The diurnal cycle for land is surprisingly symmetric about local noon for the ®rst EOF, which is approximately a half-sine during day and ¯at at night. The second EOF describes lead±lag effects due to surface heating and cloud formation. For the ocean, the ®rst EOF and second EOF are similar to that of land, except for spring, when the ®rst ocean EOF is a semidiurnal cycle and the second ocean EOF is the half-sine. The ®rst EOF for land has a daytime peak of about 50 W m22, whereas the ®rst ocean EOF peaks at about 25 W m22. The geographical and seasonal patterns of OLR diurnal cycle provide insights into the interaction of radiation with the atmosphere and surface and are useful for validating and upgrading circulation models. 1. Introduction the surface and atmosphere due to temperature, cloud, The diurnal and annual cycles of solar irradiance are and humidity variations during the day. These daily var- the two major forcing cycles for our weather and climate iations may be divided into diurnal variations, which system. The outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) re- repeat periodically, and transient variations due to sponds to this forcing by varying on both an annual and weather events, which do not repeat on a daily cycle. daily basis as a function of time and location. The ®rst Accurate knowledge of the diurnal cycle is crucial for satellite measurements relating to the diurnal variation several reasons. For sun-synchronous satellites, knowl- of OLR were analyzed by Raschke and Bandeen (1970). edge of the diurnal cycle is required to use radiometer Their data, from a sun-synchronous spacecraft, only al- measurements to compute radiant earth energy budget lowed computation of near-noon and midnight differ- (Brooks et al. 1986; Barkstrom and Smith 1986). Given ences of OLR. Nevertheless, they demonstrated the var- that one has measurements at only a few local times for iation of OLR with local time. In this paper we examine any given region, to compute daily average OLR, it is the diurnal cycle of OLR by use of 5 yr of data from necessary to make assumptions about variations of OLR the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) scan- across the day. A primary objective of the dedicated ning radiometer which was aboard the Earth Radiation ERBS was to de®ne these diurnal variations over the Budget Satellite (ERBS). This spacecraft, with an in- earth so that measurements from instruments in sun- clination of 578, precessed through all local times every synchronous orbits could be better interpreted. This ob- 72 days. The ERBS radiometers provided broadband jective resulted in the orbit design for ERBS by Harrison measurements of OLR and re¯ected solar radiation, and et al. (1983). Too, the ability of circulation models to the data are uniquely suited for study of the diurnal simulate the diurnal cycle of OLR depends on how well cycle of OLR. surface and atmospheric interactions are modeled. Ob- Daily variability of OLR results from interactions of servational knowledge of the diurnal cycle of OLR pro- vides an excellent method for validation of these mod- Corresponding author address: G. Louis Smith, Mail Stop 420, els. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681. The present paper uses ERBS scanning radiometer E-mail: [email protected] broadband measurement data over a 5-yr period to com- 1529 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/03/21 12:51 AM UTC 1530 JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES VOLUME 60 pute the diurnal cycle of OLR. A grid system of 2.58 variations of 50 W m22 over regions with deep con- regions covering the earth between 558N and 558Sis vective cycles. Extreme ranges of 100 W m22 (Atacama used. Diurnal cycles are de®ned for four 3 month sea- Desert in Peru) to 2 W m22 (some ocean regions) were sons, de®ned in section 3. This averaging process results found. In the mean they found the diurnal cycle of OLR in diurnal cycles being de®ned for over 6000 regions follows a half-sine variation, symmetric about noon. between 558N and 558S. To examine these in a system- This description was incorporated into data processing atic manner, the cycles are described in terms of prin- for ERBE when computing daily average values of cipal components, which use the data to de®ne the dom- OLR. Pinker et al. (1986), using GOES data for May± inant patterns. The time variations of the principal com- August 1982 noted a variety of patterns of diurnal cycle ponents and the geographical patterns of the correspond- of OLR and that a large sample is needed to develop ing empirical orthogonal functions provide a way to these models. describe and understand the cycles in terms of physical A dataset beginning June 1974 of nearly continuous processes which create them. data from seven National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ad- Since the paper by Raschke and Bandeen (1970), a minstration (NOAA) sun-synchronous satellites was de- number of articles have dealt with observational studies veloped by Gruber and Winston (1978) and Gruber and of the diurnal cycle of clouds and OLR, though some Krueger (1984). This valuable archive was subsequently were limited spatially, temporally, or in their use of used by Hartmann and Recker (1986), Gruber and Chen narrowband measurements. These are reviewed in the (1988), and Liebmann and Gruber (1988) to study the next section. diurnal cycles of clouds and radiation. Hartmann and Recker (1986) considered OLR for 308Nto308S. They determined the ITCZ and South Paci®c convergence 2. Background zone had similar ranges of 6 to 8 W m22 and a maximum This sections deals with the extensive literature avail- in the morning (0600±1200 LST) due to convective able concerning the study of the diurnal cycle of clouds clouds at ;400 mb. They also found diurnal variations and OLR. Due to the high temporal sampling rates of of very high clouds (;100 mb), 1808 out of phase with geosynchronous spacecraft many studies used data from variations at lower levels in atmosphere that reduced these satellites. This limited these studies to certain re- the magnitude of the diurnal harmonic. Results were gions of the globe and required conversion of narrow- presented as seasonal maps of the ®rst Fourier term of band radiances to broadband radiances, usually by cor- the diurnal cycle, using arrows to indicate magnitude relations. A Meteosat Second Generation (MSG-1), and phase for each region. Gruber and Chen (1988) spacecraft carrying the Geosynchronous Earth Radia- supplemented the same dataset with Nimbus-7 data to tion Budget (GERB) instrument, a broadband scanning expand the latitudinal range to 558Nto558S. Again radiometer, was launched in August 2002. using harmonic analysis, they showed large seasonal An early paper to study the diurnal cycle of OLR variations of the diurnal harmonic over midlatitude con- using geostationary data is Saunders and Hunt (1980). tinents. A seasonal difference of 5 W m22 at 1200 LST They considered four regions using Meteosat data and to ;16 W m22 at 1400 LST for January and July, re- found diurnal variations depended on scene type. Over spectively, was found. The maximum at local noon is ocean, high clouds, and low clouds, OLR remains fairly attributed to afternoon cloud growth. Liebmann and constant but over desert it varies during the day. They Gruber (1988) found a similar seasonal change in the estimated errors of diurnal mean OLR, based on mea- midlatitude diurnal cycle. With respect to the ITCZ they surements from a sun-synchronous spacecraft with 0900 found the maximum amplitude of the diurnal cycle, LST equator crossing, and computed a 9 W m22 error though small, migrated with the ITCZ along its seasonal for desert if the diurnal cycle is not considered when path. They point out that the semidiurnal harmonic com- calculating daily mean OLR. Schmetz and Liu (1988) ponent (not shown in their paper) often had a signi®cant also used Meteosat data to study the diurnal cycle of impact on areas of intense convection. four regions. By including the water vapor and 10.5± As ERBE data became available several studies fo- 12.5-mm window channels, they reduced the error of cused on information from this multisatellite radiation derived OLR by a factor of 2. The marine stratocumulus budget dataset. Harrison et al. (1988) showed ranges of region was found to have a diurnal cycle due to ab- OLR for all-sky and clear-sky conditions for April 1985 sorption of sunlight within the clouds, which dissipated using data from ERBE scanning radiometers aboard by midday allowing OLR to peak in the afternoon. For NOAA-9 and ERBS. Harrison et al. (1990) and Kon- the Sahara Desert they found a diurnal cycle that peaks dragunta et al.