DOCSLIB.ORG

Board of Directors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Board of Directors Annual Review 2013 Board of Directors Dennis A. Ausiello, M.D. W. Don Cornwell Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D Director, Center for Founder and Retired President Emeritus Assessment Technology and Chairman and CEO Vasser College Continuous Health (CATCH). Granite Broadcasting (2,4,5) Physician-in-Chief, Corporation Emeritus at Massachusetts (1,2,4,5) General Hospital (1,3,4,5) Helen H. Hobbs, M.D. Constance J. Horner James M. Kilts Investigator Former Assistant to Founding Partner Howard Hughes the President of the Centerview Capital Medical Institute United States and Director (2,5) (3,4,5) of Presidential Personnel (3,4,5) George A. Lorch Shantanu Narayen Suzanne Nora Johnson Chairman Emeritus President and Chief Executive Retired Vice Chairman Armstrong Holdings, Inc. Offi cer and Director of The Goldman Sachs (6) Adobe Systems Inc. Group, Inc. (3,5) (1,2,5) Ian C. Read Stephen W. Sanger Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D. Chairman and CEO Retired Chairman and CEO President General Mills Rockefeller University (1,3,5) (4,5) (1) Audit Committee (2) Compensation Committee (3) Corporate Governance Committee (4) Regulatory and Compliance Committee (5) Science and Technology Committee (6) Lead Independent Director Pfi zer Annual Review 2013 www.pfi zer.com/annual Our Business > Board of Directors 1 Annual Review 2013 Executive Leadership Team Ian C. Read Albert Bourla Frank A. D’Amelio Chairman and CEO Group President, Executive Vice President, Global Vaccines, Business Operations and Oncology and Consumer Chief Financial Offi cer Healthcare Business Mikael Dolsten, M.D. Ph.D. Geno Germano Chuck Hill President, Group President, Executive Vice President, Worldwide Research Global Innovative Worldwide and Development Pharma Business Human Resources Rady Johnson Doug Lankler Freda C. Executive Vice President, Executive Vice President, Lewis-Hall, M.D. Chief Compliance General Counsel Executive Vice President and Risk Offi cer and Chief Medical Offi cer Anthony J. Maddaluna Laurie Olson Sally Susman Executive Vice President Executive Vice President, Executive Vice President, and President, Strategy, Portfolio and Corporate Affairs Pfi zer Global Supply Commercial Operations John Young Group President, Global Established Pharma Business Pfi zer Annual Review 2013 www.pfi zer.com/annual Our Business > Executive Leadership Team 2 Annual Review 2013 How We Are Organized Our new operating structure represents the next steps in Pfi zer’s journey to further revitalize our innovative core, enhance the value of our consumer and off-patent established brands and maximize the use of our capital to deliver value to patients and our shareholders. Through this evolution, we are enabling greater independence, focus and responsiveness for our commercial businesses. Global Commercial Business Global Innovative Pharma Business Global Global Established Vaccines, Oncology Pharma and Consumer Business Healthcare Business Worldwide Pfi zer Enabling Research & Global Supply Functions Development Pfi zer Annual Review 2013 www.pfi zer.com/annual Our Business > How We Are Organized 3 Annual Review 2013 Global Innovative Pharma Business Global Innovative Pharma (GIP) is focused • Growing global business with potential in • A robust pipeline of medicines in on development, registration and developed and targeted emerging markets inflammation, cardiovascular metabolic, commercialization of novel, value creating • Launch brands include Xeljanz, Eliquis pain and rare diseases medicines that significantly improve and Duavee • Transformative capabilities that will help patients’ lives. GIP includes: • Market-leading strategic brands include to meet the challenges of an evolving Enbrel, Lyrica (U.S., Japan), Viagra (U.S.) global health care market and Champix Global Established Pharma Business Global Established Pharma (GEP) is a • Products that will go off patent (also • Legacy emerging markets large, attractive, highly diverse known as Peri-LOE) business in developed • Growth opportunities which include and profitable business with unique markets, including major brands such as Biosimilars and sterile injectables, opportunities across portfolios and Celebrex and Zyvox partnerships in key markets, and geographies. GEP is comprised of four • Legacy established products, comprised targeted opportunities in the distinct portfolio segments: of mature off-patent medicines in developed markets developed markets Global Vaccines, Oncology and Consumer Healthcare Business Global Vaccines, Oncology and Consumer • Each of these businesses is poised for Healthcare (VOC) is comprised of three high, organic growth over time separate, unique businesses that share • Each business requires distinct certain key elements: specializations and operating models in science, talent and market approach • Structure provides each business with the dedicated resources required to further strengthen and position it to be a market leader on a global basis Pfizer Annual Review 2013 www.pfizer.com/annual Our Business > How We Are Organized 4 Annual Review 2013 RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS Governance and Ethics At Pfizer, we understand that good corporate governance is essential to our standing as a trusted member of society, and we conduct ourselves accordingly. Board of Directors Compliance Pfizer’s Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight We believe that compliance with all applicable laws is of management, including the overall strategic direction of integral to our ability to serve society. We train colleagues the company, and for the company’s policies on governance, extensively in compliance and have an organizational structure executive compensation and compliance. designed to ensure good oversight of our colleagues, vendors and business partners. Read more about our Board of Directors here. Read more about our Compliance here. Ethical Sales and Marketing Disclosing Payment to We are committed to promoting our products responsibly, educating patients and providers about their appropriate use, Health Care Professionals and reporting about our business practices in a fashion that We do not pay health care professionals for prescribing our promotes transparency. medicines or as an inducement for promoting our products. We believe it is appropriate and ethical to fairly compensate Read more about our Ethical Sales and Marketing here. health care professionals for work they do on our behalf. Read more about our Disclosing Payment to Health Care Direct-to-Consumer Professionals here. Advertising in the U.S. Our strict internal standards, going beyond compliance with Human Rights the law, have been developed to ensure that the information we share with patients is scientifically sound, balanced, easy to Pfizer strives to uphold human rights in all our business activities. understand and helpful in encouraging them to consult with a We also work to advance human rights by working to improve the health care professional. health of people around the world. Read more about our Direct-to-Consumer Advertising here. Read more about our Human Rights here. Pfizer Annual Review 2013 www.pfizer.com/annual Our Business > Responsible Business > Governance and Ethics 5 Annual Review 2013 RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS Environment Committed to a Sustainable Future Our commitment to advancing health includes being good stewards of the environment. We constantly assess our business practices and advance those that we believe produce measurable value for society Our Path to a Sustainable Future — and our business, while minimizing risk to our shareholders. Our strategic approach focuses on reducing energy and water 2020 Public Goals* consumption in addition to innovative ways to manage waste. Our “green journey” focuses on three areas key to our business: ENERGY — mitigating climate change and its impacts 2 0% 15% WASTE — minimizing the environmental impact of our GHG Emissions Waste Disposed products and processes WATER — managing water resources sustainably For a comprehensive view of our contributions to a sustainable future, see here. Also, by the end of 2015, Pfizer plans to announce targets 5% that it believes have the potential to result in meaningful Water Use environmental improvement across our supply chain by the end of 2020. *Compared with Pfizer’s 2012 baseline. Pfizer Annual Review 2013 www.pfizer.com/annual Our Business > Responsible Business > Environment 6 Annual Review 2013 RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS Building on a Strong Record Carbon Disclosure Project We have a strong record in reducing Recognizes Pfizer’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. From Sustainability Efforts 2000 to 2007, we reduced our GHG In its 2013 rating, Carbon Disclosure emissions by 20 percent. From 2007 to Project (CDP) scored Pfizer 91 out of 2012, we reduced them an additional 100 for Climate Disclosure. Pfizer has 25 percent. Our current goal is to reduce participated in the CDP rankings since our GHG emissions by another 20 percent their inception, and this year’s rating by 2020, from our 2012 baseline, which — our highest — places us among the is consistent with the 60 to 80 percent top group of health care companies reduction by 2050 that scientists in both the S&P 500 and the Financial indicate is necessary to stabilize Times Global 500 listings. In 2012, Pfizer global temperatures. was also commended for incorporating sustainability information in commercial Pfizer is also an acknowledged leader tender requests, and for implementing in Green Chemistry, having made 116 energy efficiency projects yielding significant solvent and waste reductions,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Boards Drive Value in Family-Owned Businesses
    A Enduring Across Generations—How Boards Drive Value in Family-Owned Businesses ENDURING ACROSS GENERATIONS How Boards Drive Value in Family-Owned Businesses © 2015 | WomenCorporateDirectors. All materials, logos, etc., unless otherwise stated, are the property of WomenCorporateDirectors, Ltd. Copyright and other intellectual property laws protect these materials. Reproduction or retransmission of the materials, in whole or in part, in any manner, without the prior written consent of the copyright holder, is a violation of copyright law. Contact information for requests for permission to reproduce or distribute materials: [email protected]. © 2015 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. NDPPS 310255 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter 1 – The Benefits of Governance 2 Chapter 2 – The Three Enablers: Clarity, Culture, Communication 3 Chapter 3 – Building a Strong Board 8 Chapter 4 – Keys to an Effective Family Business Board 13 Chapter 5 – Cultivating and Motivating Talent 19 Conclusion 23 WCD Thought Leadership Council 25 2015 WCD Thought Leadership Commissioners 26 Unless otherwise designated, all persons quoted in this report are WCD Thought Leadership Council Members or Commissioners. A full list of Council Members and Commissioners appears on pages 25 – 28. © 2015 | WomenCorporateDirectors. All materials, logos, etc., unless otherwise stated, are the property of WomenCorporateDirectors, Ltd. Copyright and other intellectual property laws protect these materials. Reproduction or retransmission of the materials, in whole or in part, in any manner, without the prior written consent of the copyright holder, is a violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Responsibilities of the Co-Op Board of Directors
    OVERVIEW BASIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CO-OP BOARD OF DIRECTORS At start-up co-ops develop documents that spell out how the organization will operate. The corporate code often sets legal parameters for the co-op. The Articles of Incorporation contain the purpose of the co-op and its legal definitions. This document is filed with the Secretary of State. The Bylaws include the over-arching rules of the co- ops such as when where and how decisions will be made. The Board of Directors is the legal entity responsible for directing the affairs of the corporation. Every corporation MUST have a board. If a co-op operates as a collective then technically all members are on the Board. The Board must follow the rules set out in the Corporate Code, the Articles of Incorporation, and the Bylaws. Bylaw changes usually require a full membership vote to change. The members of the cooperative elect the Board.1 Three legal charges for Boards are fiduciary duty, duty of loyalty and duty of care. As trustees of the cooperative, board members have a special relationship to the cooperative to make business decisions focused only on what benefits the cooperative and all of its members. Decisions must be based on careful consideration of the issues. The fundamental legal standard for board members is to act in good faith, in a manner they believe to be in the best interests of the cooperative, and with such care, including reasonable inquiry, as an ordinary prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circle of Responsibilities for Co-Op Boards
    The Circle of Responsibilities for Co-op Boards REPRINT Management Tip Series By James Baarda Foreword All boards of directors are under increasing pressure to perform well and justify their decisions. Cooperative boards are no exception. But increasing scrutiny of director behavior is not always accompanied by better information about exactly what directors are supposed to do and how they are to perform their many duties. The series of articles reprinted here originally appeared during 2002 as Management Tip articles in three issues of USDA’s "Rural Cooperatives" magazine. These articles lay out fundamental guidelines for cooperative directors. Along with practical guides, the articles explain underlying principles and give suggestions for specific actions cooperative boards and directors can take to improve their service to cooperatives. Cooperative members can use this well-received series to assess board and individual director performance and make informed choices about directors. Directors can apply the information to carry out the full range of their responsibilities with the assurance that they are satisfying the high standards of conduct required of them. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance of Company Groups: International and Latin American Experience
    Corporate Governance of Company Groups: International and Latin American Experience Preliminary version for comment. Hosted by : Please send written comments to [email protected] by 5 December, 2014 Latin American Roundtable Task Force on Corporate Governance of Company Groups 17 November, 2014 Hotel Hilton Bogotá, CARRERA 7 NO. 72-41, BOGOTA, 00000, COLOMBIA http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/latinamericanroundtableoncorporategovernance.htm With funding support of: TABLE OF CONTENTS International and Latin American Overview ............................................................................. 3 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................ 3 2. Economic Rationale for Corporate Groups and the Role of Corporate Governance ............. 4 3. International Work on Corporate Governance of Groups ...................................................... 8 4. Economic Relevance of Company Groups in LatAm .......................................................... 12 5. What is an Economic Group in LatAm? .............................................................................. 12 6. Structure of the Regulatory and Supervisory Framework ................................................... 13 7. Protection of Minority Shareholder Rights .......................................................................... 14 8. Economic Groups and Conflicts of Interest ......................................................................... 15 9. Multinational
    [Show full text]
  • Hands on Board: the Board of Volunteers in an All-Volunteer
    All Hands on Board The Board of Directors in an All-Volunteer Organization By Jan Masaoka BOARDSOURCE E-BOOK SERIES BOARDSOURCE E-BOOK SERIES Volunteerism is an enormous economic force, yet it is never mentioned in business school or in economics departments. — Charles Hoadley, former Chief Economist, Bank of America WHAT IS AN “ALL-VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION”? If you are reading this handbook, you are part of a huge economic force — that of the all-volunteer organization (AVO). Among other tasks, members of AVOs clean up beaches, care for the dying, coach basketball teams, advocate for gun control, rescue abused animals, raise their voices in song, publish literary journals, raise scholarship funds, preserve local history, serve as volunteer fire departments, exchange heirloom seeds, host visitors from foreign countries, help people conquer alcoholism, change public perception about the disabled, and help adoptees and birth parents find each other. They make our communities, however defined, work better. That these and countless other services are provided by volunteers and not by paid staff of a nonprofit, business, or government agency would come as a surprise to many. In fact, those of us in all-volunteer organizations often don’t even think of ourselves as the important economic and social force that we are. A WORD ON TERMINOLOGY When we use the term “all-volunteer organization (AVO),” we mean a nonprofit organi- zation in which volunteers manage the organization and do most or all of the work. Some soccer leagues pay referees for Saturday games, some historic preservation societies pay gardeners, and some PTAs pay after-school art teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of Seidman Supply Chain Management Association of Grand Valley State University Preamble
    The Constitution of Seidman Supply Chain Management Association of Grand Valley State University Preamble: We, the Seidman Supply Chain Management Association of Grand Valley State University are dedicated to educating students about the profession of Supply Chain Management. Article One: Name The name of this organization established by this constitution shall be Seidman Supply Chain Management Association of Grand Valley State University, and may be hereinafter referred to as SSCMA of GVSU. Article Two: Purpose The purpose of this organization shall be to combine the American Production and Inventory Control Society of Grand Valley State University and the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals of Grand Valley State University into one organization called SSCMA. The purpose of this organization is to provide opportunities for students interested in supply chain management to communicate and learn from supply chain management professionals in order to improve their supply chain management knowledge. The organization will provide networking, learning, and career opportunities. Through professional events, such as guest speakers, lectures about current events, and member recruiting events, SSCMA of GVSU will also create awareness of the significance of supply chain management. Article Three: Membership Section One: General Assembly Membership 3.1.1 The membership of SSCMA of GVSU is determined based on the criteria outlined in the APICS of GVSU constitution, and the CSCMP of GSVU constitution. Section Two: Dues and Fees 3.2.1 There is no membership fee for SSCMA of GVSU members. Article Four: Executive Board Section One: Description 4.1.1 The Executive Board shall consist of six (6) core members: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors' Partnership Agreement
    Board of Directors’ Partnership Agreement Boards work as a team and each member of the team contributes to helping make the organization effective. Each board member is expected to be an active participant in the Fresno State Alumni Association (FSAA) to ensure that it fulfills its mission in support of the Fresno State. This agreement outlines the expectations of all FSAA Board members. Alumni Association Director Responsibilities: • Be an Ambassador for the Association and promote our primary principles of engagement, recognition and scholarships • Be informed of the FSAA’s mission, services, policies and programs • Be a donor of the FSAA at the Life level or greater (lifetime commitment of $1,000+) • Make an annual gift to the FSAA (any amount, made between July 1 st and June 30 th ) • Purchase or sell an entire table at the annual FSAA Top Dog Alumni Awards Gala recognition event (annual commitment of $1,250) • Utilize the FSAA’s online resources - Board Effect, FresnoStateAlumni.com and social media sites • Serve on one or more FSAA committees • Contribute to the development and successful implementation of the FSAA strategic plan • Collaborate with other board members in the best interest of the FSAA and Fresno State • Attend board and assigned FSAA committee meetings • Attend and support the following FSAA special events: • Top Dog Alumni Awards Gala • Recognition events • Student engagement events and activities • Annual Board of Directors Dinner • Other Board events designated by the Executive Committee Association staff will: • Provide timely information and support to assist the Directors in accomplishing their tasks. • Provide linkages to campus units.
    [Show full text]
  • The Board of Directors
    Welcome to the Board of Directors An Orientation Manual for Directors Revised April 2017 Table of Contents Introduction 1. Fiduciary Responsibilities of a Board Member 2. Fundraising 3. Board’s Responsibility for Financial Oversight 4. Strategic Planning 5. Overseeing the Performance and Compensation of Management 6. Risk Management and Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance 7. Board Evaluation Conclusion 1 Revised April 2017 Introduction Welcome to the Board of Directors. We appreciate your willingness to serve. Our Organization fills an important need in our community, and we believe that you will find serving on the Board a rich and rewarding experience. As a director, you and your fellow board members are responsible for overseeing the Organization’s operations, while maintaining our commitment to its mission. This involves establishing our strategic direction, ensuring our compliance with all applicable legal requirements, and keeping our Organization financially healthy. This manual will help you understand your rights and responsibilities as a director so that you can effectively carry out these duties. We encourage you to refer to it whenever you have questions about your Board service. Over the past several years, many groups and organizations have placed a great emphasis on nonprofit governance. Watchdog groups such as the Better Business Bureau’s Wise Giving Alliance and Charity Navigator regularly rate charities based in large part on the organization’s governance structure. The IRS Form 990, the reporting form that most charities must file with the IRS on an annual basis, asks for detailed information about every nonprofit organization’s governance practices and policies. Donors, foundations and the press have also placed a greater emphasis on nonprofit governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Roles & Responsibilities Board of Directors
    SIA BUSINESS PROPRIETARY ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES BOARD OF DIRECTORS, BUSINESS MANAGER AND ADVISORS MISSION STATEMENT To educate the international trade community by providing a forum for the exchange of information on the export and import process. BACKGROUND & PURPOSE The Society for International Affairs, Inc. (SIA) is a volunteer, non-profit, educational organization that was jointly formed in 1967 by US Government and Industry. SIA provides a forum for the exchange of information related to export and import licensing. SIA interests cover the entire spectrum of export and import licensing issues pertaining to the Departments of Commerce, Defense, State, Justice, Treasury, Homeland Security and others, as appropriate. ACTIVITIES Conferences are presented on a regular basis to educate and instruct the international trade community on all aspects of defense and commercial exports and technology transfers. Business luncheon meetings, Webinars and/or Teleconferences are held periodically and feature guest speakers who address regulatory and policy issues affecting exporting and importing. Workshops are included with luncheons whenever possible to address topics or issues in greater depth to foster discussion or focus. MEMBERSHIP Membership is comprised of individuals from Industry, US Government, Academia and Foreign Embassies. SIA maintains three (3) Categories of Membership, which are outlined in the organization’s Bylaws. The categories consist of Industry, Student and Government. Rev. 1/18 Page 1 SIA BUSINESS PROPRIETARY BOARD OF DIRECTORS SIA has a Board of Directors elected from the Membership. The Board manages and controls the property, business, and affairs of the Society. A list and contact information for the current Board of Directors can be found in Annex A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Board of Directors in Corporate Governance Article by Mary Kelly FCCA, Examiner in Professional 1 Corporate Governance
    The Role of the Board of Directors in Corporate Governance Article by Mary Kelly FCCA, Examiner in Professional 1 Corporate Governance. The board of directors are the link between those who provide the capital, and who have the most to lose, and those who are employed in order to manage and create value for the investors. The corporate governance code is a market based approach with shareholder primacy which enables the board of directors to act in a flexible and responsible manner in exercising its responsibilities. A board’s responsibilities will include determining the long term aims of the company, providing leadership to achieve these aims, establishing a supervisory process to ensure that the management of the business is effective and also to report to shareholders on its performance to date. Directors must think comprehensively about their overall tasks and consider the skills and requirements of each individual member. Key to the success of the organisation will be the leadership provided by the chairman of the board with support from the Chief Executive Officer. There should be a clear division of responsibilities at the head of the organisation between the running of the board and the executive responsibility for the activities of the company's business. The board of directors is charged with developing the corporate goals and strategy and designing the implementation process in order to address any problems the company may have in growing in a competitive environment. The effectiveness with which board of directors discharge their responsibilities will determine the company's competitive position. They must be able to drive their companies’ strategy forward but they must do so within a framework of effective accountability and transparency, not just to shareholders but to all stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Basic Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards
    Ten Basic Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards The National Center for Nonprofit Boards has issued a paper on “Ten Basic Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards” to clarify the roles and responsibilities of the board as a corporate or collective entity and to summarize individual board members’ responsibilities. In addition, five assumptions are listed at the end of this arrticle to reduce the many questions surrounding effective board leadership. The ten board responsibilities which follow, along with the individual board member’s responsibilities, strive to set criteria by which boards may periodically review their performance and ensure a measure of accountability. 1. Determine the Organization’s Mission and Purpose The board’s fundamental responsibility is to satisfy itself that everyone connected directly or indirectly with the organization understands its reasons for existing. This usually takes the form of a written mission statement. In addition to ensuring that the organization has a modern statement of what it is, represents, and does, the board should periodically review the statement’s adequacy, accuracy, and viability. A widely distributed statement of mission and purpose should clearly express the organization’s goals, means, and primary constituents served. Further, it should explain what makes the organization distinctive and special and present a compelling reason for individuals, foundations and corporations to support it financially. An adequate statement of mission and purpose should serve as a guide to organizational planning, board and staff decision-making, volunteer initiatives, and setting priorities among competing demands for scarce resources. It sets the state for developing fund raising strategies and strategic planning as well as the board’s many other responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • American Institute of Cpas/Public Accounting Board of Directors
    American Institute of CPAs/Public Accounting Board of Directors Public Accounting Professional Unit and AICPA Board of Directors Minutes of Meeting: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 Contents (by Topic) Attendance ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Chairman's Report ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Future CPA Pathways ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 IASB as Standard Setter Under the Compliance with Standard Rules .............................................................................................. 4 Tax/PFP Strategy Update: Report from AICPA Council & Next Steps ............................................................................................... 5 Page | 1 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants Public Accounting Professional Unit and AICPA Board of Directors Minutes of Meeting: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 A meeting of the Public Accounting Professional Unit Board of Directors was held on Wednesday, November 29, 2017 in London, England. The meeting convened at 9:00am GMT. Attendance The following Board members were present: Anita Baker Mark Begich Tom Broderick Paul Curth
    [Show full text]