Ocm39986872-1951-HB-2127.Pdf (849.2Kb)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2020 Cape Cod Water Health Report and Action Plan Association to Preserve Cape Cod Website
State of the Waters: Cape Cod : 2020 Cape Cod Water Health Report, Action Plan and Atlas of Water Restoration Needs and Solutions State of the Waters: Cape Cod 2020 Cape Cod Water Health Report and Action Plan Association to Preserve Cape Cod Website: https://capecodwaters.org July 28, 2020 Prepared by: Andrew Gottlieb, Jo Ann Muramoto, Ph.D., Jordanne Feldman, Kristin Andres, Don Keeran and Kevin Johnson 1. Introduction The State of the Waters: Cape Cod is an annual assessment of the Cape’s water quality, designed to help you understand the water quality problems that we face and the actions that are needed to address these problems. The Association to Preserve Cape Cod (APCC) launched this project in 2019 in order to answer the question: “How healthy are Cape Cod’s waters?” This website is the place to find out about the Cape’s water quality and what can be done to address water pollution and achieve clean water. For this multi-year project, APCC collected existing data on water quality on Cape Cod for the purpose of determining the health of Cape Cod’s waters. APCC evaluated water quality in coastal waters (saltwater), freshwater ponds and lakes, and public drinking water supplies. APCC used existing methods to score water quality and used the scores to distinguish between degraded surface waters where immediate action is needed to improve water quality vs. surface waters with acceptable quality where ongoing protection is needed to avoid any decline in quality. The results are summarized in this annual water health report. To guide public action, APCC prepared a Water Action Plan that contains recommendations for changes in policies, actions, and regulations to improve and protect our waters. -
Attachment A
Project Final Report Decreasing Phosphorus in Cranberry Waters by Implementation of Best Management Practices Project Number 12-02/319 Dates: 2012 – 2015 Grantee Carolyn DeMoranville University of Massachusetts Amherst 508-295-2212 x25 UMass Cranberry Station, One State Bog Rd., PO Box 569, E. Wareham, MA 02538 Malcolm M. Harper, MassDEP Project Manager 8 New Bond Street, Worcester MA 01606 508-767-2795 PREPARED FOR: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION AND US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 1 MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS Matthew A. Beaton, Secretary DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Martin Suuberg, Commissioner BUREAU OF WATER RESOURCES Douglas Fine, Assistant Commissioner DIVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES Steven J. McCurdy, Director Decreasing Phosphorus in Cranberry Waters by Implementation of Best Management Practices Project Number 12-02/319 A. Project Snapshot A1. Project start date: July 16, 2012 A2. Date closed: June 30, 2015 A3. Basin and HUC 12 subwatershed location Buzzards Bay Basin, 4 bog locations: 1) White Island Pond AD Makepeace Bogs - Buzzards Bay Basin, HUC-12 Cape Cod Canal to Stony Point 010900020303 2) White Island Pond Federal Furnace Bogs - Buzzards Bay Basin, HUC-12 Cape Cod Canal to Stony Point 010900020303 3) Eagle Holt Bogs, Wareham - Buzzards Bay Basin, HUC-12 Sippican River 010900020301 4) Pierceville Bogs, W. Wareham - Buzzards Bay Basin, HUC-12 Weweantic River 010900020302 South Coastal Basin, 1 bog location Mayflower Bog, Duxbury - South Coastal Watershed, HUC-12 Standish Shore to Cordage 010900010105 Taunton Basin, bog location with filter bed Winebrook Bog, Halifax - Taunton Watershed, HUC-12 Satucket River 010900040101 A4. -
DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load
DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission April 2007 DRAFT Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi -
Official List of Public Waters
Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area). -
Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program
Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices. -
Massachusetts Freshwater Beaches [2018]: Water Quality Data for Public and Semi-Public Beaches
Massachusetts Freshwater Beaches [2018]: Water quality data for public and semi-public beaches The table below summarizes testing and posting information for each freshwater beach in Massachusetts. Under the state regulations, freshwater beaches must test for either E. coli or Enterococci. Most beaches do not have to post after each exceedance, provided that (1) they take an immediate resample and (2) that resample does not exceed the standard. Thus, a beach may have an exceedance but no days posted. Conversely, a beach may have days posted, but no exceedances, if it was posted for a reason other than a bacterial exceedance (e.g. rainfall, a cyanobacterial harmful algae bloom, or another hazard such as limited visibility due to poor water clarity). Single Minimum Maximum Testing Days Community Beach Name Tests Indicator Sample Exceedance Exceedance Frequency Posted Exceedances (cfu/100mL) (cfu/100mL) Abington Island Grove Beach Weekly 12 E. coli 3 236 312 3 Acton NARA Beach Weekly 16 E. coli Agawam Robinson Pond Beach (DCR) Weekly 15 Enterococci Amesbury Camp Bauercrest Weekly 10 E. coli Amesbury Glen Devin Condominiums Weekly 11 E. coli 2 261 1553 14 Amesbury Lake Attitash - A.L.S.I.A. Weekly 11 E. coli Amesbury Lake Gardner Weekly 11 E. coli 1 261 261 7 Amesbury Tuxbury RV Resort Lagoon Weekly 11 E. coli Amherst Puffers Pond (North) Weekly 17 E. coli 4 240 1986.3 8 Amherst Puffers Pond (South) Weekly 18 E. coli 4 285.1 1986.3 8 Andover Camp Maude Eaton (1) Weekly 11 E. Coli Andover Camp Maude Eaton (2) Weekly 11 E. -
White Pond As a Resource for All: a Vision for Water Quality, Usage and Sustainability
White Pond as a Resource for All: A Vision for Water Quality, Usage and Sustainability Prepared by White Pond Advisory Committee Cheryl Baggen, Josh Galper, Beth Kelly, Jeff Parker Town of Concord, Massachusetts Discussion Draft for August 25, 2021 White Pond as a Resource for All 1 Table of Contents Executive Overview ............................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Water Quality Management .............................................................................................................. 4 Water Quality Detection, Prevention and Control .................................................................... 8 People Management ............................................................................................................................ 9 Call to Action ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix A: Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 13 Appendix B: White Pond Testing and Water Level ................................................................ 13 Appendix C: Causes and Effects of Cyanobacteria Blooms ................................................... 16 Appendix D: Monitoring, Testing and Pond -
Use of Thematic Mapper Imagery to Assess Water Quality, Trophic State, and Macrophyte Distributions in Massachusetts Lakes
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Use of Thematic Mapper Imagery to Assess Water Quality, Trophic State, and Macrophyte Distributions in Massachusetts Lakes By MARCUS C. WALDRON, PETER A. STEEVES, and JOHN T. FINN (Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst) Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4016 Prepared in cooperation with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Northborough, Massachusetts 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of trade or product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts-Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 10 Bearfoot Road Denver, CO 80225-0286 Northborough, MA 01532 or visit our web site at http://ma.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Methods...................................................................................................................................................................... -
Bacteria Detected at Hampton Ponds
tONight: Scattered Showers. Low of 55. Search for The Westfield News The WestfieldNews Search for “G The REATNESSWestfield News IS NOT Westfield350.com The WestfieldNews MEASURED BY WHAT A MAN Serving Westfield, Southwick, and surrounding Hilltowns OR WOMAN“TIME IS THE ACCOMPLISHES ONLY , WEATHER BUTCRITIC BY THEWITHOUT OPPOSITION TONIGHT HE OR SHEAMBITION HAS OVERCOME.” TO REACH HIS GOALS Partly Cloudy. JOHNSearch STEINBECK for The Westfield.” News Westfield350.comWestfield350.orgLow of 55. Thewww.thewestfieldnews.com WestfieldNews — DOrOthy height Serving Westfield, Southwick, and surrounding Hilltowns “TIME IS THE ONLY WEATHERVOL. 86 NO. 151 TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 2017 75 centsCRITIC WITHOUT VOL.TONIGHT 88 NO. 205 FRIDAY, AUGUST 30, 2019 75AMBITION Cents .” Partly Cloudy. JOHN STEINBECK Low of 55. www.thewestfieldnews.com BacteriaVOL. 86 NO. 151 detected at HamptonTUESDAY, JUNE Ponds; 27, 2017 75 cents blue green algae at Sportsman’s Club By HOPE E. TREMBLAY the bloom. Assistant Managing Editor “A lot of us take our dogs to swim at the pond,” he said. WESTFIELD – The Hampton Ponds State Park is closed for According to the Department of Public Health page on mass. swimming until further notice due to high levels of bacteria gov, cyanobacteria are microscopic bacteria that live in all and the pond at the Westfield Sportsman’s Club is also closed types of water bodies. A large growth of these bacteria results because of cyanobacteria algae bloom. in algal blooms that can pollute the water and may even be Both are still open for other recreational uses. toxic to animals and people. Westfield Director of Public Health Joseph Rouse said “clo- “When a dramatic increase in a cyanobacteria population sures at Hampton Ponds occur annually for elevated levels of occurs, this is called harmful algal blooms (HABs), or more bacteria usually due to contamination from water fowl.” accurately, cyanobacterial HABs (CyanoHABs). -
MDPH Beaches Annual Report 2008
Marine and Freshwater Beach Testing in Massachusetts Annual Report: 2008 Season Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health Environmental Toxicology Program http://www.mass.gov/dph/topics/beaches.htm July 2009 PART ONE: THE MDPH/BEH BEACHES PROJECT 3 I. Overview ......................................................................................................5 II. Background ..................................................................................................6 A. Beach Water Quality & Health: the need for testing......................................................... 6 B. Establishment of the MDPH/BEHP Beaches Project ....................................................... 6 III. Beach Water Quality Monitoring...................................................................8 A. Sample collection..............................................................................................................8 B. Sample analysis................................................................................................................9 1. The MDPH contract laboratory program ...................................................................... 9 2. The use of indicators .................................................................................................... 9 3. Enterococci................................................................................................................... 10 4. E. coli........................................................................................................................... -
Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts' Waters
Photo: Supe87, Under license from Shutterstock.com from Supe87, Under license Photo: ToXIC WATERWAYS Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts’ Waters Lauren Randall Environment Massachusetts Research & Policy Center December 2011 Executive Summary Coal-fired power plants are the single larg- Human Services advises that all chil- est source of mercury pollution in the Unit- dren under twelve, pregnant women, ed States. Emissions from these plants even- women who may become pregnant, tually make their way into Massachusetts’ and nursing mothers not consume any waterways, contaminating fish and wildlife. fish from Massachusetts’ waterways. Many of Massachusetts’ waterways are un- der advisory because of mercury contami- Mercury pollution threatens public nation. Eating contaminated fish is the main health source of human exposure to mercury. • Eating contaminated fish is the main Mercury pollution poses enormous public source of human exposure to mercury. health threats. Mercury exposure during • Mercury is a potent neurotoxicant. In critical periods of brain development can the first two years of a child’s life, mer- contribute to irreversible deficits in verbal cury exposure can lead to irreversible skills, damage to attention and motor con- deficits in attention and motor control, trol, and reduced IQ. damage to verbal skills, and reduced IQ. • While adults are at lower risk of neu- In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection rological impairment than children, Agency (EPA) developed and proposed the evidence shows that a low-level dose first national standards limiting mercury and of mercury from fish consumption in other toxic air pollution from existing coal- adults can lead to defects similar to and oil-fired power plants. -
2019 WATER HEALTH REPORT-Draft
State of the Waters: Cape Cod 2019 Cape Cod Water Health Report State of the Waters: Cape Cod 2019 Cape Cod Water Health Report Association to Preserve Cape Cod October 1, 2019 Prepared by: Andrew Gottlieb, Jo Ann Muramoto, Ph.D., Jordanne Feldman, Bryan Horsley, Kristin Andres and Don Keeran 1. Introduction The State of the Waters: Cape Cod is an assessment of the Cape’s water quality, designed to help you understand the water quality problems that we face and the actions that are needed to address these problems. The Association to Preserve Cape Cod (APCC) launched this project in 2019 in order to answer the question: “How healthy are Cape Cod’s waters?” This website is the place to find out about the Cape’s water quality and what can be done to address water pollution and achieve clean water. For this multi-year project, APCC collected existing data on water quality on Cape Cod for the purpose of determining the health of Cape Cod’s waters. APCC evaluated water quality in coastal waters (saltwater), freshwater ponds and lakes, and public drinking water supplies. APCC used existing methods to score water quality and used the scores to distinguish between degraded surface waters where immediate action is needed to improve water quality vs. surface waters with acceptable quality where ongoing protection is needed to avoid any decline in quality. The results are summarized in this annual water health report. To guide public action, APCC prepared a Water Action Plan that contains recommendations for changes in policies, actions, and regulations to improve and protect our waters.