DOCSLIB.ORG

Title Goes Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title Goes Here Video 257: More on Gnostic Cosmology —the Kenoma vs. Orion by Wes Penre, May 22, 2021 The video to this transcript can be found on our Video channel: https://wespenrevideos.com ___________________________________________________________________________________ t least since the Matrix series came out in the theatres, people in the alternative fields have called our 3-D reality “the Matrix.” We see it as either a simulated A reality, and/or a narrow frequency band, within which humankind is limited. This has been the norm of thinking in the alternative field since the beginning of this millennium. In the Wes Penre Papers (WPP), I discussed the 4% Universe, which would correspond with this limited frequency band, and the 96% Universe, which is the Universe humans in our 3-D bodies cannot perceive. Science calls the invisible Universe dark matter and dark energy, and they don’t know what it is and why we cannot see it. In the WPP, I wrote that the invisible Universe is Orion, or the Orion Empire (see wespenre.com for more info). Then, I started looking into the Gnostic texts and discussed those on my blog1. As far as I am concerned, the Gnostic texts (GT) are a direct extension of the WPP, or I would say the WPP are to a degree the GT but told from another perspective. 1 https://wespenrevideos.com/ © 2021 Wes Penre Productions. Can be freely distrubuted for personal use if not in any way altered. 1 In the GT, there are four major “realms” being mentioned. They are, the Pleroma (the Spiritual Realm), the 9th and 8th Heavens (Sophia’s/the Orion Queen’s Realm in the physical Universe), the 7th to 1st Heavens, i.e., the Kenoma, which we usually call the Matrix, and finally the 5 Heavens/dimensions of the Underworld or the Abyss. This cosmological setup is not only conveyed in the GT; it is the setup conveyed in almost all ancient cultures; if not exactly the same, at least they are very similar to each other. In this video, we will concentrate on the GT cosmology and cosmogony. In the GT, we are told there is a veil between Sophia’s 8th and 9th Heavens and the lower Heavens, where we humans and the Archons reside, among other beings of different kinds. In the WPP, I called the 8th and 9th Heavens Orion, so the 8th and 9th Heavens and Orion are synonymous. The rest of the Universe is the Kenoma/Matrix/Patrix. So far, many people who have read the WPP and some of the GT probably agree. But what are the 7 Heavens? How far do they stretch and where are they located in the physical universe (because mind you, even Orion is a part of the physical universe but is largely lit up by Sophia’s Spirit). Some of Sophia’s Spirit is also present in the Kenoma, but it has been fading through the ages. Humans, however, as the only beings in the physical universe, possess Sophia’s Spirit, in addition to having a soul, which is our personality. On the screen right now (or below, if you are reading the transcript) is a picture I have been using a lot. It is a depiction from ancient texts of the 7 Heavens, aka the Kenoma. Look at this diagram very carefully. Obviously, you see the Earth at the bottom, and then you see certain celestial bodies above with Saturn on top. Above that, you have the star © 2021 Wes Penre Productions. Can be freely distrubuted for personal use if not in any way altered. 2 constellations. You might say this is a diagram of the solar system (more or less), and the star constellations are beyond the solar system. This is of course NASA’s public version of the Universe. But let us look at it from another angle. According to the Gnostic texts (GT)2, each of these celestial bodies are possessed and controlled by an Archon, and each celestial body is a Heaven. How many celestial bodies can you count to in this diagram? Seven, right? These are the 7 Heavens. This means that anything and everything that is outside our solar system is Orion. The solar system, including Earth, which is the Underworld, consisting of 5 additional Heavens/dimensions, is the Kenoma. A thought might come to mind: if the solar system is the Matrix/Kenoma, the realm of the Archons seems very tiny. Yes, it is, compared to Orion, but we also need to remember that we humans have a very limited frequency band within which we view things. The celestial bodies are occupied by the Archons, but these heavenly bodies exist in many different dimensions and densities; we can only see the barren 3-D perspective. Also, the spheres between the planets are part of the sphere of that particular Heaven, respectively. For instance, the Heaven of Mars (the 5th Heaven), consists of the planet itself and the “space” between Mars and Jupiter and all the additional dimensions within that sphere/space/cosmic water. Now, look at the diagram again! Does it seem like these planets, including Earth, are revolving around the sun? No! Here is my theory: the planets, including Earth, don’t revolve around the sun at all, which we also can see in gnostic and other ancient diagrams; they revolve around Earth and move within our atmosphere! Now wait! What do I mean by that? I mean that everything we have been taught about the solar system and the Universe is wrong! My interpretation of the GT and all the other major ancient texts is that all these heavenly bodies exist within the Earth’s atmosphere! Before you shake your head in disbelief, take an observer’s viewpoint, without having any preconceptions, and look at this. In school we have clearly learned that outer space begins where the atmosphere ends. And in near space we have the planets and the sun. What if that is false, too? What if the atmosphere stretches much farther out, but we humans are only allowed access to so much of it? Remember that all these planets; including the sun; are Archontic domains. Would the Archons really allow us humans to enter their domains as we wish, or would they only allow it on occasion, when it suits them? The moon is currently an Archontic domain, as well. So, what about the Apollo moon landings? Were they real or fake? Well, there is much evidence that the footage was created in a studio by Stanley Kubrick and his team, and that the Apollo astronauts never 2 The Secret Book of John (long version): http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/apocjn-meyer.html © 2021 Wes Penre Productions. Can be freely distrubuted for personal use if not in any way altered. 3 went to the moon. This seems very plausible in the scheme of things, doesn’t it? However, does that mean that no humans have ever been to the moon? Not necessarily. It depends on whether we have been allowed access. If, or when we were, did we go in the physical or in an astral body? What about so-called “teleportation?” Is that real? These are questions we can ask ourselves. Also, one of the best remote viewers in modern time, the late Ingo Swann, remote viewed the moon and saw human slave labor working inside the moon. He wrote about it in his book, Penetration. He was noticed by humans on the moon during his session, and in shock, he withdrew his soul-fire, afraid of being captured. Let’s ask ourselves, if this is really what Ingo Swann experienced, how could these humans see him when he was not in the physical? The obvious explanation is that they were not in a physical 3-D body, either. They could very well have been in a higher density body. Moreover, look at the moon; particularly when there is a full moon. Does it seem like the moon is 239,000 miles away, somewhere in outer space, or does it look like it’s within the atmosphere, being the closest celestial body to Earth, but very much closer than NASA is telling us? The latter is obvious to me. When we think of it in these terms, we start seeing things we were blind to before. We just uncritically accept NASA’s lies that the moon is 239,000 miles away as a fact. However, when we objectively observe this heavenly body, it’s almost ridiculous that we could be so naïve before. In the WPP, I wrote about the Saturn stargate, and how it used to be Ninurta’s/Sabaoth’s domain (the 7th Heaven), but it was conquered by En.ki/Yaldabaoth and Marduk, and Ninurta fled through the stargate, which led directly to Orion. What does this mean? It means that outside Saturn is Orion as per the diagram I showed you. The Saturn stargate was then closed. I also wrote in the WPP that En.ki/Yaldabaoth and the other Archons/the AIF no longer have access to the KHAA, except to small portions of it. In the 5th Level of Learning I discussed which portions they are3. There are certain star systems and constellations in Orion that the Archons and their foot soldiers conquered in the far gone past, and they still have access to those systems. They can use their hollowed-out crafts (asteroids, etc.) to travel through stargates and star lanes to those locations outside the Kenoma, but that’s also all they have access to in addition to our solar system, i.e., the Earth’s atmosphere.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tertullian and the Doctrine of the Trinity I
    TERTULLIAN AND THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY I. Tertullian – Originator of the Trinity Tertullian's Legend At the end of the second century there were three main centers of church organization – in Antioch, in Alexandria, and in Rome. The language used in the church writings was Greek. But the situation was soon to be changed; due to the writings of Tertullian, Carthage, his city, and Latin, his language, were to gain prominence and give rise to a Latin Christianity.1 Though Tertullian (ca 170-ca 230) is the most important Christian writer2 in the development of Christian doctrine, he was not mentioned during the third century. He inspired, however, other writers in Africa: Minucius Felix (fl. second half of the second century), Cyprian (200-258), Arnobius of Sicca (fl. ca 300), Lactantius (ca 240-ca 320), and the first Italian theologian who wrote in Latin, Novatian (210-280), whose De Trinitate3 is just a repetition of Tertullian's treatise. Novatian‟s treatise was written in 257 and probably in reaction to the doctrine of Sabellius (fl. ca 215) which he began to propound shortly before. Even today Tertullian‟s importance is not fully recognized. Adolf von Harnack (1851-1930), a preeminent German theologian, writes: When the Nicene formulary is praised, it is always of Athanasius that we think; when the Chalcedonian decree is cited, it is the name of Leo the Great that is magnified. But that Tertullian is in reality the father of the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity and of the Person of Christ, and that in the whole patristic literature there is no treatise that can be compared in importance and influence with the tract “Against Praxeas” it has necessarily been left to the investigation of our own day to exhibit.4 2 We do not know much about Tertullian, and what we know is primarily from his own writings.5 We know that Septimius Tertullianus6 lived during the reigns of Emperor Septimius Severus (193-211) and his son Caracalla (211-217) in Carthage, and was probably born ca 170.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Divinity in the University of Edinburgh, in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    THE CONCEPTION OF REDEMPTION IN THE GNOSTIC THEOLOGIES OF THE FIRST AND SECOND CENTURIES. JOHN BALDWIN CORSTON. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Divinity in the University of Edinburgh, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. PREFACE The present study is an attempt to trace the develop­ ment of the Gnostic conception of redemption from the almost pagan systems of the Ophites to the classical Christian Gnostic schools of Marcion, Basilides and Valentinus. The earlier forms of Gnosticism are connected with various elements of Oriental mythology: the more developed Christian systems em­ phasize Christ as sole redeemer, and set forth something of the mystery of the love of God, which sets men free from the evil of this world. Gnosticism approaches closely to Chris­ tianity in the fragments of Heracleon, and also in the Odes of Solomon, which I believe to have been hymns of redemption composed by a Christian Gnostic writer. The Gnostics, however, always regarded redemption as an enlightenment which was limited to a certain number of chosen spirits. This ex- clusiveness which Gnosticism shared with the mystery religions was the cause of its later departure from Christianity, and of its reversion to paganism under the influence of Egyptian magic and the Oriental cults of the dead. In Chapter 2 I have sought to derive certain pagan elements of Gnosticism from early Babylonian and Persian sources. I have drawn upon the monumental findings of Sousset and Reitzenstein in this field of inquiry: yet I feel that neither of these scholars has sufficiently explained the way by which these ancient religions reached the later period of the Gnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Afterlives of the Archons: Gnostic Literalism and Embodied Paranoia in Twenty-First Century Conspiracy Theory
    gnosis: journal of gnostic studies 4 (2019) 255–281 brill.com/gnos The Afterlives of the Archons: Gnostic Literalism and Embodied Paranoia in Twenty-First Century Conspiracy Theory Matthew Dillon DePauw University [email protected] Abstract This article analyzes the reception of the ancient Gnostic archons, or rulers, in con- temporary conspiracy theories. In the classical Gnostic myth these nefarious beings rule the cosmos, mold primordial matter into a prison for Adam and Eve, and blind the Elect to their divine nature. These archons send cataclysms to earth and serve as ce- lestial gatekeepers that keep the divine light trapped in their creation. Contemporary conspiracy theorists such as John Lamb Lash, David Icke, and Carol Reimer read the archons not as allegories or metaphors, but as real beings at work in contemporary politics, media and religion. Utilizing Michael Barkun’s concept of “superconspira- cies,” this article examines how conspiracists Lash, Icke, and Reimer weave disparate conspiratorial discourses together through the classical Gnostic myth. The article con- cludes that the vast gulf between the anticosmic and anthropic dualism of the classical myth and the generally pro-cosmic and humanist thrust of modern esoterica leads these authors into paradoxical understands of cosmos, mind and eschatology. Keywords archons – conspiracy theory – gnostic reception – John Lamb Lash – David Icke – Carol A. Reimer © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/2451859X-12340077 GNOS_004_01_12-Dillon.indd 255 16/04/2019 18:27:17 256 Dillon 1 Classical Archons and Modern Reception The rediscovery of ancient Coptic texts such as the Berlin Codex, the Tchachos Codex, and most famously the Nag Hammadi collection, has led to a dramat- ic resurgence of interest in Gnostic figures and ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • E Tragedy of Cosmogonic Objectivation in the Valentinian Gnosis and Russian Philosophy Vladimir Solovyov, Lev Karsavin, and Nikolay Berdyaev
    e Tragedy of Cosmogonic Objectivation in the Valentinian Gnosis and Russian Philosophy Vladimir Solovyov, Lev Karsavin, and Nikolay Berdyaev Aleksey Kamenskikh A e subject of this paper is a specific form of cosmogony—the con- ception of cosmogonic objectivation, interpreted as a tragedy or cosmogonic fall. is conception is examined on the basis of the evidence furnished by two sets of materials: firstly, the original texts and paraphrases of the Valentinian Gnostics of the 2ⁿᵈ and 3ʳᵈ centuries AD (Irenaeus Adversus haereses, 1.1.1–1.1.10; Excerpta ex eodoto, compiled by Clement of Alexandria; and e Gospel of Truth from the Nag Hammadi Library), and secondly, the writings of the Russian philosophers Vladimir Solovyov, Lev Karsavin and Nikolay Berdyaev. e research reveals a series of specific features common to both of these: in particular, the conception of cosmogonic objectivation appears to be connected with the doctrine of the absolute person’s fall, and with the motive of self-alienation. K Berdyaev, Nikolay; Clement of Alexandria; Cosmogonic objectiva- tion; e Gospel of Truth; Irenaeus; Karsavin, Lev; Russian philosophy; Solovyov, Vladimir; Valentinian Gnosis На исходе Второго тысячелетия вновь слышится эхо падения Pax Romana и мученических родов человечества: тогда ещё за- мысла, выговариваемого безумными словами. Mikhail Geer¹ Something in Gnosticism knocks at the door of our Being and of our twentieth-century Being in particular. Hans Jonas² In recent years, a number of works concerned with the problem of the re- lationship of Gnosticism to Russian religious philosophy have been pub- lished.³ Certainly, we should not accept any categorical judgments about F P 18 (2013) no.
    [Show full text]
  • •Ooo- TABLE of CONTENTS
    IRENAEUS and GNOSTICISM. By REV. A.D. LIVINGSTONE, M.A., B.D., —— oOo—— Thesis Submitted fo± the DEGREE OP PH.D., IN THEOLOGY. UNIVERSITY OP EDINBURGH - 1934 - •oOo- TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page Preface ....••••• . i-iii CHAPTER I, The Life and Work of Irenaeus . 1 11 II, The Hellenistic Age . 26 11 III, The Gnosticism of the 'Adversus . 52 11 IV, The Argument of Irenaeus against the Heresies ..... 81 " V, Basilides ...... Ill 11 VI, Valentinus ..... • 139 11 VII, The Disciples of Valentinus and the Valentinian Speculation . 167 " VIII, Marcion ...... 203 11 IX, The Minor Sects of Irenaeus . 237 " X, The Sources of the Gnostic Her- w iD .L w 5 • • • • • • . 266 11 XI, The Points of Contact with Chris­ tianity ...... 300 " XII, The Evolution of the Gnostic Systems ...... • 321 EXCURSUS I, The Literary Style Of Irenaeus . iv 11 II, The Gnostic 'Diagram 1 x " III, The Barbelo ..... xiv " IV, laldabaoth ..... xvii 11 V, Naassene Hymn .... XX " VI, Bibliography ..... xxiv -oOo- The field that discloses itself to the view of a student of Irenaeus is so vast that it would be the veriest dream to envisage it within the compass of a single volume^and more so of a thesis. The present writer has been saved from such a venture, for the limits of his theme are embodied in the title "Irenaeus and Gnosticism". Even so the field might be interpreted in too wide a sense. The Coptic-Gnostic writings, theXN Pistis SophiaJ'and the ciBooks of JeuJJ and obviously the Gnostics of Plotinus, the writer has ventured to consider out- with his limits, as they were not within the knowledge of Irenaeus.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostles' Creed Background
    Apostles’ Creed Background Docetism (probably from Greek. dokein, “appear, seem”). Ancient and modern view that Christ had no real but only an apparent body and that He therefore did not really suffer but only apparently; related to Gnosticism. (http://cyclopedia.lcms.org/display.asp?t1=D&word=DOCETISM) Marcion of Sinope (c. 85 – c. 160) was an important figure in early Christianity. Marcion preached that the god who sent Jesus into the world was a different, higher deity than the creator god of Judaism. He considered himself a follower of Paul the Apostle, who he believed to have been the only true apostle of Jesus Christ. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcion_of_Sinope) “About 140 AD there was a man by the name of Marcion in Rome and his teachings were nothing short of heretical. For instance, he taught that the God of the OT was different from the God of the New. Thus, the God of the Christian was not the creator God of the OT. Marcion taught that the God of the OT was angry and stern whereas the God of the NT is a God of love. According to Marcion, not only was the God of the OT angry, he also created all material. And if the God who created material was a mean old god, then the material he created must not be far behind in terms of badness! Now, think of the implication. If Jesus was different from that mean OT God, then Jesus couldn’t really have had a material body. Therefore, Marcion taught that Jesus only seemed to have a body.
    [Show full text]
  • Jessenic View on Gnosis (Thirteen Points Of
    JESSENIC VIEW ON GNOSIS (THIRTEEN POINTS OF CLARIFICATION AND DEFENSE OF TRUE JESSENIAN GNOSTIC HERITAGE) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – What Jessenes assume to be Gnosticism and Gnosis........................................................... 2 2 – What Jessenes, as Gnostics, assume to be the Cosmos........................................................ 4 3 – What Jessenes, as Gnostics, understand and conceive regarding Deity............................... 8 4 – What Jessenian Gnosticism conceives on being human .................................................... 11 5 – Gnostic-Jessenian conception on Salvation ....................................................................... 15 6 – The concept of proper conduct in Jessenian Gnosis .......................................................... 16 7 – The Jessenian Gnostic concept on fate or heimarmené...................................................... 20 8 – Jessenian Gnosis and its respective definition of psyche and of the Jungian scientific assessment regarding the aspects of human psyche and ego ................................................... 22 9 – The great Gnostic ancient concept of Gehenna or reflecting sphere and the psycopompic work of the great Mystery Schools from all times and ages .................................................... 27 10 – The fear of some modern Gnostics about what the great angelical work of God’s Love before the mystery of the death, revealed in Psalm 23............................................................. 30 11 – The Gospel of Pistis Sophia
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Gnostic Gospels
    Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum Studies and Texts in Antiquity and Christianity Herausgeber/Editors Christoph Markschies (Berlin) Martin Wallraff (Basel) Christian Wildberg (Princeton) Beirat/Advisory Board Peter Brown (Princeton) · Susanna Elm (Berkeley) Johannes Hahn (Münster) · Emanuela Prinzivalli (Rom) Jörg Rüpke (Erfurt) 82 Beyond the Gnostic Gospels Studies Building on the Work of Elaine Pagels Edited by Eduard Iricinschi, Lance Jenott, Nicola Denzey Lewis and Philippa Townsend Mohr Siebeck Elaine Pagels, born 1943; 1964 BA, 1965 MA from Stanford University; 1970 PhD; since 1982 professor of early Christian history at Princeton University; in 2012 Princeton University’s Howard T. Behrman Award for Distinguished Achievement in the Humanities. Eduard Iricinschi, born 1968; MA in Religious Studies from New York University; PhD in the Religions of Late Antiquity from Princeton University; currently postdoctoral Polonsky fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. Lance Jenott, born 1980; studied History, Classics, and Religion at the University of Washing- ton (Seattle) and Princeton University; PhD in the Religions of Late Antiquity from Prince- ton University; currently postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Oslo. Nicola Denzey Lewis, born 1966; BA in Religious Studies from the University of Toronto; MA and PhD from Princeton University in Religion and the Program in the Ancient World; currently Visiting Associate Professor of Religious Studies at Brown University. Philippa Townsend, born 1975; degrees in Classics from Cambridge University and Univer- sity College London, in Religion from Harvard University and Princeton University; PhD from Princeton in the Religions of Late Antiquity; currently Assistant Professor of Philoso- phy and Religion at Ursinus College, Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • SMYRNA - 100 to 300 AD SMYRNA - 100 to 300 AD Key Word “Tribulation”
    CHURCH HISTORY SMYRNA - 100 to 300 AD SMYRNA - 100 to 300 AD Key word “tribulation” I. Introducing the Smyrna Church period (100-300 AD) A. Modern Day City - IZMIR (large metropolis) B. The Persecuted or Martyred Church C. Means - “ __________ or ____________________ ” II. Outline of The Early Church in the Period of the Apologists: 120-220 A. Key people Included : Justin Martyr, Marcion, Clement of Alexandria, Polycarp, Tertullian, and Origen B. Important Dates and People : 1. 130 d. Papias 2. 130 Conversion of __________________________ . Justin loved philosophy, and had studied many philosophies and pagan religions in his search for truth. He was an apologist, and taught that the seeds of truth (logos) could be found in all religions, but that only Christianity taught the whole truth 3. 144 ______________ excommunicated for rejecting the Old Testament, rejecting most of the New Testament, and teaching that Christ only appeared to be human (Docetism). His challenge helps the church realize the necessity of formally recognizing the canon 4. 150 b. Clement of Alexandria . He was an apologist who used Plato to support Christianity, and tried to reach gnostics by showing that only the Christian had real "gnosis." He helped establish the allegorical method of interpreting scripture. His works make up a large proportion of The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. II 5. 155 ________________ was martyred in Smyrna by being burned to death. Polycarp declared, "Eighty and six years have I served Him, and He never did me any injury: how then can I blaspheme my King and my Savior?" The only known writings to survive are parts of letters he wrote to the Philippians 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Heresies by Saint Irenaeus Courtesy of Newadvent
    Against Heresies By Saint Irenaeus Courtesy of NewAdvent Table of Contents: Book I Preface Chapter 1 Absurd ideas of the disciples of Valentinus as to the origin, name, order, and conjugal productions of their fancied aeons, with the passages of Scripture which they adapt to their opinions. Chapter 2 The Propator was known to Monogenes alone. Ambition, disturbance, and danger into which Sophia fell; her shapeless offspring: she is restored by Horos. The production of Christ and of the Holy Spirit, in order to the completion of the aeons. Manner of the production of Jesus. Chapter 3 Texts of Holy Scripture used by these heretics to support their opinions Chapter 4 Account given by the heretics of the formation of Achamoth; origin of the visible world from her disturbances Chapter 5 Formation of the Demiurge; description of him. He is the creator of everything outside of the Pleroma Chapter 6 The threefold kind of man feigned by these heretics: good works needless for them, though necessary to others: their abandoned morals Chapter 7 The mother Achamoth, when all her seed are perfected, shall pass into the Pleroma, accompanied by those men who are spiritual; the Demiurge, with animal men, shall pass into the intermediate habitation; but all material men shall go into corruption. their blasphemous opinions against the true Incarnation of Christ by the Virgin Mary. Their views as to the prophecies. Stupid ignorance of the Demiurge Chapter 8 How the Valentinians pervert the Scriptures to support their own pious opinions Chapter 9 Refutation of the impious interpretations of these heretics Chapter 10 Unity of the faith of the Church throughout the whole world Chapter 11 The opinions of Valentinus, with those of his disciples and others Chapter 12 The doctrines of the followers of Ptolemy and Colorbasus Chapter 13 The deceitful arts and nefarious practices of Marcus Chapter 14 The various hypotheses of Marcus and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Gnostic Gospels
    Contents Articles Gnosticism 1 Philo 26 Simon Magus 36 Cerinthus 44 Valentinus (Gnostic) 48 Basilides 53 Gnostic texts 62 Gnostic Gospels 65 Gnosticism and the New Testament 69 Mandaeism 76 Manichaeism 85 Esoteric Christianity 100 Theosophy 104 Gnosis 111 Catharism 116 Bogomilism 129 Monad (Gnosticism) 134 Pleroma 135 Platonic Academy 137 References Article Sources and Contributors 143 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 146 Article Licenses License 147 Gnosticism 1 Gnosticism Gnosticism This article is part of a series on Gnosticism History of Gnosticism Early Gnosticism Syrian-Egyptic Gnosticism Gnosticism in modern times Proto-Gnostics Philo Simon Magus Cerinthus Valentinus Basilides Gnostic texts Gnostic Gospels Nag Hammadi library Codex Tchacos Askew Codex Bruce Codex Gnosticism and the New Testament Related articles Gnosis Neoplatonism and Gnosticism Mandaeism Manichaeism Bosnian Church Esoteric Christianity Theosophy Gnosticism Portal Gnosticism (Greek: γνῶσις gnōsis, knowledge) refers to diverse, syncretistic religious movements in antiquity consisting of various belief systems generally united in the teaching that the cosmos was created by an imperfect god, the demiurge with some of the supreme God's pneuma; this being is frequently identified with the Abrahamic God, (as opposed to the Gospel according to the Hebrews) and is contrasted with a superior entity, referred to by several terms including Pleroma and Godhead.[1] Depictions of the demiurge—the term originates with Plato's Timaeus[2] —vary from being as an embodiment of evil, to being merely imperfect and as benevolent as its inadequacy permits. Gnosticism was a dualistic religion, influenced by and influencing Hellenic philosophy, Judaism Gnosticism 2 (see Notzrim), and Christianity;[3] however, by contrast, later strands of the movement, such as the Valentinians, held a monistic world-view.[4] This, along with the varying treatments of the demiurge, may be seen as indicative of the variety of positions held within the category.
    [Show full text]
  • Gnostic Musings #1: Why Are We Constantly Descending Through the Kenoma?
    Gnostic Musings #1: Why are we Constantly Descending Through the Kenoma? Gnostic Musings #1: Why are we Constantly Descending Through the Kenoma? by Wes Penre, July 3, 2020 1 ow, when we have completed the twenty-one part Gnosis Series that is directly based upon the Gnostic texts and what these convey to N us, we want to connect some additional dots that might be interesting for the reader. We need to keep in mind that the original Gnostic texts were partly written in metaphors, allegories, and analogies, and parts of them are literal. Christ gave us the Message in a way that it is communicating direct to Spirit, but from a perspective that we can understand, while dwelling in this dense realm of matter that we call 3-D. Ariel and I have discussed the texts quite thoroughly between each other, ©2020 Wes Penre Productions. Feel free to redistribute for non-commercial and educational purposes only. Gnostic Musings #1: Why are we Constantly Descending Through the Kenoma? and as we have done so, certain dots start connecting, which make all the information we have gathered over the year come together quite nicely in our own minds. Important! If you haven’t, please first read our Gnosis Series Part 1-21 on our blog (https://wespenrevideos.com/category/gnosticism/), or this series of articles will not make much sense. Alternatively, if you are familiar with the Gnostic Gospels already, you might be able to follow us in our thought process. Some of what we will be writing about in this new series can be directly backed up by the Gnostic texts, the Wes Penre Papers (WPP), and other sources we have studied over the years, while other parts are speculations, musings, and pure dot connection.
    [Show full text]