DOCSLIB.ORG

Belgian Participation Exemption Not in Compliance with EU Parent/Subsidiary Directive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Belgian Participation Exemption Not in Compliance with EU Parent/Subsidiary Directive April 2009 / Special Alert A legal update from Dechert’s International and Domestic Tax Group Belgian Participation Exemption Not in Compliance With EU Parent/Subsidiary Directive In case C-138/07 Belgische Staat v NV Cobelfret, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) held on 12 February 2009 that the Belgian participation exemption regime, as currently in effect, is not in compliance with the EU Parent/Subsidiary Directive, given that the exemption only applies when the parent company has a taxable profit balance after deduction of other exempted profits. Belgian companies which have been adversely affected by this limitation on the participation exemption as implemented in Belgium will be able to claim lost carry-forward tax losses that would have been available had Belgium correctly applied the provisions of the EU Parent/Subsidiary Directive. EU Parent/Subsidiary Directive Belgian Participation Exemption Regime The EU Parent/Subsidiary Directive (Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the Pursuant to the Directive, Belgium has opted to common system of taxation in the case of parent implement an exemption method with the companies and subsidiaries of different Member following particularities, as provided in Article States, O.J. 1990 L 225, p. 6, hereinafter “the 202 of the Belgian Income Tax Code: If the Directive”) has as its purpose to eliminate double parent company holds a participation of at least taxation of corporate profits when profits earned 10% of the subsidiary’s share capital, or by a subsidiary located in one EU Member State alternatively if the participation has an are distributed to a parent company located in acquisition cost of at least EUR 1.2 million, the another EU Member State. Pursuant to Article dividends related to this participation can be 4(1) of the Directive, the EU Member State of the eligible for the Belgian participation exemption. parent company receiving distributed profits Furthermore, the relevant participation must from its subsidiary must exempt these profits, qualify as a financial fixed asset, which is i.e. dividends, from taxation. In order to apply normally mentioned in the financial accounts such a tax exemption, the EU Member State can under the heading “participations and other use one of the following methods: (i) an shares”. exemption method, whereby the EU Member State refrains from taxing the profits; or (ii) a Regarding the manner in which the participation credit method, whereby the parent company may exemption is calculated, the dividends received credit against its taxes due a part of the (foreign) are first incorporated in the parent company’s tax already paid by the subsidiary on the taxable profits. Thereafter, 95% of the amount of distributed profits. Furthermore, the Directive the dividends so included is deducted from the provides that the EU Member State in which the parent company’s taxable profits. The latter subsidiary is located must exempt the deduction is commonly referred to in Belgium as distributed profits from withholding tax. the “Dividends Received Deduction” (DRD). Apart d d from the limitation to 95% of the dividend amount, Tax Authorities are obliged to adapt the DRD system the DRD is also limited to the net amount of profit to comply with the requirements of the Directive, and related to the taxable period concerned. This means retrospectively, to permit deduction of the excess that the DRD cannot be availed of in any year in DRD which has been lost pursuant to the operation in which the parent company is not making any profits. the past of the limitations which have been held Moreover, if the DRD exceeds the profits made by the incompatible by the Court. Although the Court’s parent company, the unused portion of the DRD decision is only binding insofar as dividends received cannot be carried forward. from subsidiaries in other EU countries are concerned, since the Belgian legislation and the ECJ In case C-138/07 brought before the ECJ, the Belgian ruling make no distinction between cross-border and company Cobelfret challenged the compatibility of domestic situations insofar the DRD is concerned, it the Belgian exemption system with the requirements is expected that the new rule to be adapted in of the Directive. Due to the aforementioned implementation of the Court decision will also apply limitations in the Belgian regime, Cobelfret had been in both domestic and cross-border situations. unable to use the DRD for several years, since the company had not generated any taxable profits for Should Belgian corporate taxpayers, whether they are these years. In addition, the DRD on dividends members of a European or domestic corporate group, received from Cobelfret’s subsidiaries had been only find themselves in the situation where the DRD was partially availed of in one year, since the profit for not applied due to lack of sufficient or no taxable that year was insufficient for Cobelfret to claim the profits, administrative claims can be filed with the full DRD. The Antwerp Court of First Instance Belgian Tax Authorities in order to recuperate the accepted Cobelfret’s arguments, holding that unapplied DRD. Pursuant to the applicable tax Belgium had implemented the Directive incorrectly. procedures currently in effect and depending on However, upon appeal by the Belgian Income Tax whether tax assessments were already made for the Administration, the Antwerp Court of Appeal referred year(s) where the DRD was applied incorrectly, the case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling upon the administrative claims could be filed not only for the question of EU law. current tax assessment year but also for the two previous assessment years, and in some cases even for the four previous assessment years. In case no tax ECJ Ruling in Case C-138/07 Belgische assessment has yet been made for the year where the Staat v NV Cobelfret DRD was applied incorrectly, a correction can in principle be made via the first income tax declaration In its decision, the ECJ ruled that the Belgian system that must be filed. of limiting deductibility of the DRD to situations where the parent company’s operations are profitable Given that international corporate groups frequently was incompatible with the requirements of Article use Belgian holding companies for the accumulation 4(1) of the Directive. Indeed, the Belgian system and the distribution of their worldwide profits, it is results, in cases where the parent company’s anticipated that there will be fairly numerous tax operations are not profitable, in the effective taxation adjustments sought in the wake of the ECJ ruling. In of the dividend income by virtue of reduction of the addition, going forward, the changes to the Belgian parent company’s available loss carryforward. participation exemption mandated by the ruling should make Belgium an even more attractive The Court held that by limiting the application of the jurisdiction for the operation of holding companies, DRD to situations where taxable profits are achieved, joint venture investment companies and other Belgium has added a condition that is not envisaged vehicles which take advantage of Belgium’s nor permitted by the Directive. The Belgian Tax participation exemption, negligible domestic tax Administration’s argument that the DRD system charges on investment income and gains and liberal treats domestic and cross-border situations in the exemptions from withholding tax on outgoing same way, thereby implementing the Directive distributions. correctly, was rejected by the Court. ■ ■ ■ Practical Implications of the ECJ ruling on Belgian Cross-Border and Domestic Situations This client alert was authored by Geert Dierickx (+32 2 535 5416; [email protected]). Given the ECJ decision that the Belgian DRD regime is not in compliance with the Directive, the Belgian April 2009 / Special Alert 2 d Practice group contact For more information, please Geert Dierickx contact the attorney listed or the Brussels Dechert attorney with whom +32 2 535 5416 you regularly work. Visit us at [email protected] www.dechert.com/tax. Dechert is a combination of two limited liability partnerships (each named Dechert LLP, one established in Pennsylvania, US, and one incorporated in England). Dechert has over 1,000 qualified lawyers and a total complement of more than 1,800 staff in Belgium, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Luxembourg, the UK, and d the US. Dechert LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales (Registered No. OC306020) www.dechert.com and is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The registered address is 160 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4QQ, UK. A list of names of the members of Dechert LLP (who are referred to as "partners") is available for inspection at the above address. The partners are solicitors or registered foreign lawyers. The use of the term "partners" should not be construed as indicating that the members of Dechert LLP are carrying on business in partnership for the purpose of the Partnership Act 1890. Dechert (Paris) LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (Registered No. OC332363), governed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, and registered with the French Bar pursuant to Directive 98/5/CE. A list of the names of the members of Dechert (Paris) LLP (who are solicitors or registered foreign lawyers) is available for inspection at our Paris office at 32 rue de Monceau, 75008 Paris, France, and at our registered office at 160 Queen Victoria Street, London, EC4V 4QQ, UK. Dechert LLP is in association with Hwang & Co in Hong Kong. This document is a basic summary of legal issues. It should not be relied upon as an authoritative statement of the law. You should obtain detailed legal advice before taking action. This publication, provided by Dechert LLP as a general informational service, may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sweden Country Highlights
    International Tax Sweden Highlights In Plain English 1701 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC. 20006, USA Phone : +1 202 792 6600 www.CastroAndCo.com Investment basics: Surtax – There is no surtax. Currency – Swedish Krona (SEK) Alternative minimum tax – There is no alternative minimum tax. Foreign exchange control – No Taxation of dividends – Dividends received Accounting principles/financial statements by a Swedish resident company from – Principles applied are in accordance another Swedish company normally are with the Annual Accounts Act, the Swedish exempt from tax, provided the shareholding Accounting Standards Board, the Swedish is business-related. Dividends received Financial Accounting Standards Council and from a nonresident company also may be the Swedish Institute of Authorized Public exempt if the shareholding is business- Accountants. related (see under “Participation exemption,” below). Even if qualifying for the exemption, Principal business entities – These are the dividends will not be exempt if the dividend private/public limited liability company (AB), payment is treated as a tax-deductible partnership (KB and HB), sole proprietorship, expense in the country of the payer and branch of a foreign company. company. Other dividends are included in Corporate taxation: business income and taxed at the corporate tax rate applicable for the financial year. Residence – A corporation is resident in Sweden if it is incorporated in accordance Capital gains – Capital gains derived from with the Companies Act. the sale
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Selected Countries © Loyens & Loeff N.V
    2019 Holding Regimes 2019 Comparison of Selected Countries © Loyens & Loeff N.V. 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or in an automated database or disclosed in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of Loyens & Loeff N.V. Insofar as it is permitted, pursuant to Section 16b of the Dutch Copyright Act 1912 (Auteurswet 1912) in conjunction with the Decree of June 20, 1974, Dutch Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 351, as most recently amended by the Decree of December 22, 1997, Dutch Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 764 and Section 17 of the Dutch Copyright Act 1912, to make copies of parts of this publication, the compensation stipulated by law must be remitted to Stichting Reprorecht (the Dutch Reprographic Reproduction Rights Foundation, PO Box 3060, 2130 KB Hoofddorp, the Netherlands). For reproductions of one or more parts of this publication in anthologies, readers or other compilations (Section 16 of the Dutch Copyright Act 1912), please contact the publisher. This publication does not constitute tax or legal advice and the contents thereof may not be relied upon. Each person should seek advice based on his or her particular circumstances. Although this publication was composed with the greatest possible diligence, Loyens & Loeff N.V., the contributing firms and any individuals involved cannot accept liability or responsibility for the results of any actions taken on the basis of this publication without their cooperation, including any errors or omissions. The contributions to this book contain personal views of the authors and therefore do not reflect the opinion of Loyens & Loeff N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions
    Taxation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions Hungary kpmg.com/tax KPMG International © 2016 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. Hungary Introduction — The profit realized during the sale or in-kind contribution of the so-called ‘reported intangible assets’ (if entitled This overview of the Hungarian regime for mergers to royalty income) is exempt from corporate income tax and acquisitions (M&A) and related tax issues only under certain circumstances. Certain profit from non- discusses statutory frameworks for acquisitions in reported intangible assets may also become tax-exempt. Hungary. It does not consider any specific contractual — The general rate of value added tax (VAT) was increased to arrangements that may affect such transactions. 27 percent, as of 1 January 2012. The primary legislation governing the form and — The concept of real estate investment trusts (REIT) was introduced to the Hungarian legislation, as of 27 July 2011. regulation of companies is ACT V of 2013 on the Civil Code (the Civil Code), effective since 15 March — Withholding tax (WHT) on interest, royalties and certain 2014. As a result of the accession of Hungary to the service fees was abolished as of 1 January 2011. European Union (EU) on 1 May 2004, new forms — As of 1 January 2013, the transfer of a business unit of business associations have been integrated into may be out of scope of VAT if the acquirer meets certain the Hungarian company law legislation, such as conditions prescribed in the Act on VAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Facts 2020
    KPMG Law Advokatfirma Tax Facts 2020 A survey of the Norwegian Tax System February 2020 © 2020 KPMG Law Advokatfirma AS, a Norwegian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent kpmglaw.nomember firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Tax Facts 2020 | KPMG Law Advokatfirma | 1 Contents 1. Controls/restrictions on business 7 1.1. Foreign exchange 8 1.2. Foreign investor participation 8 1.3. Takeovers, mergers and acquisitions 8 2. Corporate Taxation 11 2.1. Overview 12 2.2. Residence 12 2.3. Income Liable to Tax 12 2.4. Deductions 12 2.5. Gain/loss on realisation of assets 14 2.6. The exemption method for dividend and gains 14 2.7. Double tax relief (DTR) 16 2.8. Losses 18 2.9. Grouping/consolidated returns 18 2.10. Tax rates 19 2.11. General anti-avoidance standard 19 2.12. Special anti-avoidance clause 19 2.13. Controlled foreign company (CFC) 19 2.14. Transactions between related parties 20 2.15. Transfer pricing 21 2.16. Limitations of tax deductibility for interest expenses 22 2.17. Taxes on undistributed profits 25 2.18. Exit tax 25 2.19. The petroleum tax system 25 2.20. Taxes and fees in the power sector 28 2.21. Tonnage tax 30 2.22. Branches / permanent establishments in Norway 31 2 | Tax Facts 2020 | KPMG Law Advokatfirma 2.23. Tax liability under domestic law and permanent establishment 31 2.24. Branch versus subsidiary 32 2.25. Formal requirements and procedures 32 2.26.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation and Investment in Hungary 2015 Reach, Relevance and Reliability
    Taxation and Investment in Hungary 2015 Reach, relevance and reliability A publication of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Contents 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment 1.2 Currency 1.3 Banking and financing 1.4 Foreign investment 1.5 Tax incentives 1.6 Exchange controls 2.0 Setting up a business 2.1 Principal forms of business entity 2.2 Regulation of business 2.3 Accounting, filing and auditing requirements 3.0 Business taxation 3.1 Overview 3.2 Residence 3.3 Taxable income and rates 3.4 Capital gains taxation 3.5 Double taxation relief 3.6 Anti-avoidance provisions 3.7 Administration 3.8 Other taxes on business 4.0 Withholding taxes 4.1 Dividends 4.2 Interest 4.3 Royalties 4.4 Branch remittance tax 4.5 Wage tax/social security contributions 5.0 Indirect taxes 5.1 Value added tax 5.2 Capital tax 5.3 Real estate tax 5.4 Transfer tax 5.5 Stamp duty 5.6 Customs and excise duties 5.7 Environmental taxes 6.0 Taxes on individuals 6.1 Residence 6.2 Taxable income and rates 6.3 Inheritance and gift tax 6.4 Net wealth tax 6.5 Real property tax 6.6 Social security contributions 6.7 Other taxes 6.8 Compliance 7.0 Labor environment 7.1 Employee rights and remuneration 7.2 Wages and benefits 7.3 Termination of employment 7.4 Labor-management relations 7.5 Employment of foreigners 8.0 Deloitte International Tax Source 9.0 Contact us Hungary Taxation and Investment 2015 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment Hungary is a parliamentary democracy with a unicameral parliament called the National Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Incentives and Taxes in the Netherlands 2021
    Incentives and taxes 2021 The Netherlands January 2021 Stimulating Foreign Investment and Entrepreneurship Table of contents Introduction 4 Attractive Features 4 Competitive statutory corporate income tax rate 5 Innovation Box: effective tax rate of 9% 5 Participation Exemption: drive for European headquarters 6 Fiscal Unity Regime: consolidated tax returns 6 Losses: carry-back for one year and carry-forward for six years 6 Ruling Practice: certainty in advance 7 Transfer Pricing: arm’s length principle 7 R&D wage tax deduction (WBSO): incentive to invest in R&D 7 MIA and Vamil: tax relief schemes for environmentally friendly investments 8 Energy Investment Allowance (EIA): tax relief program for sustainable energy 8 30% facility: special tax regime for expats 9 Wide Tax Treaty Network: avoidance of double taxation 9 Treaty-based tax rate reductions 10 VAT reverse charge mechanism on import: cash-flow advantages 10 Dutch Tax Authorities: easy access to the tax inspector 11 Dutch Customs Authorities: practical and pro-active approach 11 3 Introduction With a competitive corporate income tax rate in Europe—15% on the first € 245,000 and 25% for taxable profits exceeding € 245,000—as well as a number of attractive incentive programs, the Netherlands offers a supportive fiscal climate for international companies. The Netherlands offers a wide tax treaty network, special measures for highly skilled expats and certainty in advance of future tax positions—just a few of the features that help multinational companies to thrive in the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Relevant to M&A Transactions Are the Continued Implementation of the BEPS Actions Into Domestic Legislation
    UNITED KINGDOM GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION 1 UNITED KINGDOM INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? The main developments in the UK relevant to M&A transactions are the continued implementation of the BEPS actions into domestic legislation. The UK is generally supportive of the BEPS actions and has already issued legislation. In particular, the UK tax authority has introduced new legislation in the following areas: Action 2: Hybrid mismatch legislation took effect from 1 January 2017 Action 4: Corporate interest deduction - restricting tax deductions available for interest expense based on 30% of the UK group’s EBITDA or a group ratio based on actual net third party interest to EBITDA for the worldwide group, which took effect from 1 April 2017 Action 6 / 15: The UK signed the MLI in June 2017 and introduced draft legislation to implement the modification of bilateral tax treaties to implement tax treaty measures developed as part of the BEPS project Corporation tax loss carried forward rules – restricting the amount of carried forward losses which can be offset in the future but providing more flexibility in how losses can be relieved, took effect from 1 April 2017 Substantial Shareholding Exemption changes – which simplifies the UK capital gains participation exemption requirements and should make it available more widely. Since 1 April 2017, the UK’s corporation tax rate has been 19% and it has been announced that this will decrease to 17% from April 2020. The decrease in the tax rate is expected to be offset with an increase in the tax base by increasing anti-avoidance provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing an Investment Vehicle European Real Estate Fund Regimes
    Choosing an investment vehicle European Real Estate Fund Regimes May 2019 www.pwc.com/realestate This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors. Introduction This booklet aims to provide an overview of the most common European collective investment vehicles (CIVs) suitable for investment in real estate, including their legal form, as well as their regulatory and tax position. The AIFM Directive entered into force on Many countries offer attractive tax facilities, 22 July 2013 and has been implemented by including tax exemptions, to their local real EU Member States, which had to consider estate CIVs. In many countries, these tax both regulatory matters and changes to facilities are not available to real estate CIVs Uwe Stoschek fund and investor taxation. This has resulted investing from a different jurisdiction. Therefore, in significant changes in the European real there are still important steps to take until there Partner, estate fund landscape. AIFMD has forced is a level playing field for real estate CIVs also Global Real Estate Tax fund managers and investors to change from a tax perspective. Our country specialists Leader their approach and look not only at national mentioned in this publication will be very happy PwC Germany rules, but also at EU rules and guidelines. to help you by providing further information on At the same time, the new passports for any of the fund vehicles described. +49 30 2636-5286 professional investor funds provide new +49 160 5820641 options. Managers must consider where they [email protected] apply for authorisation to obtain the licence, paying close attention to legal and tax aspects, as well as available business infrastructure and personal resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Holding Regimes in a New Era 2020 Edition Comparison of Tax and Non-Tax Aspects of Selected Countries © Loyens & Loeff N.V
    2020 EDITION Holding Regimes in a New Era 2020 edition Comparison of Tax and Non-Tax Aspects of Selected Countries © Loyens & Loeff N.V. 2020 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or in an automated database or disclosed in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of Loyens & Loeff N.V. Insofar as it is permitted, pursuant to Section 16b of the Dutch Copyright Act 1912 (Auteurswet 1912) in conjunction with the Decree of June 20, 1974, Dutch Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 351, as most recently amended by the Decree of December 22, 1997, Dutch Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 764 and Section 17 of the Dutch Copyright Act 1912, to make copies of parts of this publication, the compensation stipulated by law must be remitted to Stichting Reprorecht (the Dutch Reprographic Reproduction Rights Foundation, PO Box 3060, 2130 KB Hoofddorp, the Netherlands). For reproductions of one or more parts of this publication in anthologies, readers or other compilations (Section 16 of the Dutch Copyright Act 1912), please contact the publisher. This publication does not constitute tax or legal advice and the contents thereof may not be relied upon. Each person should seek advice based on his or her particular circumstances. Although this publication was composed with the greatest possible diligence, Loyens & Loeff N.V., the contributing firms and any individuals involved cannot accept liability or responsibility for the results of any actions taken on the basis of this publication without their cooperation, including any errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile Portugal
    Portugal Country Profile EU Tax Centre June 2018 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Portugal EU Member State Yes Double Tax Treaties With: Algeria Finland Macau Senegal Andorra(a) France Malta Singapore Armenia Georgia Mexico Slovakia Austria Germany Moldova Slovenia Bahrain Greece Montenegro(a) South Africa (a) Barbados Guinea-Bissau Morocco Spain Belgium Hong Kong Mozambique Sweden Brazil Hungary Netherlands Switzerland Bulgaria Iceland Norway Timor-Leste(a) Canada India Oman(a) Tunisia Cape Verde Indonesia Pakistan Turkey Chile Ireland Panamá UAE China Israel Peru UK Colombia Italy Poland Ukraine Croatia Ivory Coast(a) Qatar Uruguay Cuba Japan Romania US Cyprus Rep. of Korea Russia Venezuela Czech Rep. Kuwait San Marino Vietnam Denmark Latvia Sao Tome Estonia Lithuania and Principe(a) Ethiopia(a) Luxembourg Saudi Arabia (a) Treaties signed, but not yet effective. Most important General Partnership, Private Limited Liability Company, Public Limited forms of doing Company, Limited Partnership, Partnership Limited by Shares. business © 2018 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. 1 Legal entity capital The minimum capital required will depend on the legal form of the entity: requirements - Private Limited Liability Company: EUR 1; - Public Limited Liability Company: EUR 50,000; - Partnership Limited by Shares: EUR 50,000. Residence and tax Companies are deemed resident in Portugal for tax purposes if the head office system or place of effective management (regardless of the head office’s jurisdiction) is located there. These two requirements often occur simultaneously, providing consistency within tax law.
    [Show full text]
  • Netherlands Euro (EUR) Foreign Exchange Control No Accounting Principles/Financial Statements IAS/IFRS/Dutch GAAP
    Investment basics Currency Netherlands Euro (EUR) Foreign exchange control No Accounting principles/financial statements IAS/IFRS/Dutch GAAP. Financial statements must be filed annually. Principal business entities These are the public company (naamloze vennootschap or NV), private limited liability company (besloten vennootschap or BV), partnership (commanditaire vennootschap or CV, vennootsc hap onder firma or VOF, etc.), cooperative and branch of a foreign company. Godfried Schutz Auke de Jong Partner Senior Manager Tel: + 718 508 6112 Tel: + 1 212 492 4916 [email protected] [email protected] Corporate taxation Residence Companies that have their management in the Netherlands and, in principle, all companies incorporated according to Dutch civil law are regarded as Dutch resident. Capital gains Basis Capital gains derived from the sale of a participation are Residents are liable to tax on their worldwide income; exempt if the participation exemption applies (see under nonresidents are taxed only on Netherlands-source “Participation exemption”). Other capital gains are taxed at income. Exemptions may apply for certain income from the normal corporate rate. Gains arising on a (de-)merger shareholdings, permanent establishments (PEs) and may be exempt if certain requirements are met. innovative activities (see under “Participation exemption” and “Incentives”). Branches of foreign companies and subsidiaries Losses are treated the same way in determining corporate income Losses may be carried forward for nine years and carried tax, although branches usually are exempt from withholding back for one year. Losses incurred in fiscal years 2009 tax on profit remittances to their foreign head offices. through 2011 may be carried back for three years upon request, in which case, the term for carryforward is limited Taxable income to six years.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Tax Comparative Guide
    Connecting knowledge & people Corporate Tax Comparative Guide Connecting Knowledge and People Powered by Mondaq AI Corporate Tax Comparative Guide UK James Anderson t: +44 (0) 207 519 7060 e: [email protected] Joseph Hone t: +44 (0) 207 519 7235 e: [email protected] Other Corporate Tax contributing countries Argentina Ireland Brazil Kenya Lebanon Cyprus Malta Czech Republic Morocco Gibraltar Nigeria Greece Portugal Ireland Switzerland Italy USA 1. Basic Framework 1.1 Is there a single regime or is the regime multi-level (eg, federal, state, city)? There is a single, UK-wide corporation tax regime. 1.2 What taxes (and rates) apply to corporate entities which are tax resident in your jurisdiction? For the financial year 2019–20, the main rate of UK corporation tax is set at 19%. According to current legislation, this rate should fall to 17% in 2020–21. A ‘surcharge’ applies to certain banking entities (see question 2.7). Where taxable profits are attributed to the exploitation of patents (including where the profits arise from the sale of a product that includes a patent and from patent royalties), a tax rate of 10% may be applicable (see question 2.5). Connecting knowledge & people 1.3 Is taxation based on revenue, profits, specific trade income, deemed profits or some other tax base? Corporation tax is generally charged on a company’s taxable profit for an accounting period, being the sum of its income profits and chargeable gains less certain deductible payments. 1.4 Is there a different treatment based on the nature of the taxable income (eg, gains on assets as opposed to trading income or dividend income)? Corporation tax is charged on both income profits and chargeable gains, although different rules apply to the computation of each, including the available deductions, and exemptions are available to certain classes of income such as dividends earned as investment income.
    [Show full text]