DOCSLIB.ORG

Eu Myths and Success Stories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

www.mega.bupnet.eu EU MYTHS AND SUCCESS STORIES The European Commission's support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. www.mega.bupnet.eu INTRODUCTION What is an EU myth? EU myth or euromyth usually refers to invented stories or distorted facts about the European Union (EU) and the activities of its institutions. The EU is accused of nonsensical EU legislation, bureaucracy and all difficulties and challenges arising from global trends. Why should we talk about EU myths and check the real facts? As European Union constantly faces different manifestations of Europhobia, unmasking EU myths becomes more and more important to keep the EU united. Web-based communication and social media take a significant part in today’s Eurosceptic mobilization. Facts checking help not only to unmask the EU myths but as well to better understand the EU processes. What is MEGA project? MEGA project stands for Make Europe Great Again and is a two-year project funded by the Erasmus+ Programme (project number 2019-3-DE04-KA205- 018681) that aims at enhancing critical thinking and media literacy of young people by analysing and unmasking Europhobic myths. The project partnership is coordinated by the German Adult Education provider BUPNET GmbH based in Göttingen and consists of partners from Austria, Cyprus, France, Italy and Lithuania. Compilation of the EU myths (fake news) and success stories consists of 145 of the most common EU myths along with the explanations with facts and useful links where correct information can be found and 60 success stories along with shortcomings of the EU. For easier reading myths are grouped into topics such as legislation, policy, religion, culture, migration, finances, functioning of the EU, health care, democracy, Brexit, and then into countries. Success stories of the EU are grouped into general achievements and country-specific stories. Most of the links to reliable sourses are only available in national languages, therefore we recommend to use “Google Translate” or other tools to read them. If you are interested to learn more about MEGA project or to contact us go to https://mega.bupnet.eu/ The European Commission's support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. www.mega.bupnet.eu SPOTTING FAKE NEWS AND MISINFORMATION How to decide whether the story should be trusted: The Story Where did you find the story? Investigate the site, its contact info, read the“About us” section The Author Who is the author of the story? Is there an author or it is anony-mous? Does the author specialize in the field that the article is concerned with? To check this info about the author, go to LinkedIn or make a quick Google search. Fact Check Does all the evidence match? Check the sources of the story, if there are no sources try to find as much information as you can and then decide if the story is accurate or not. Make sure there are at least two sources to verify a story. Be cautious if you see provocative headlines with excessive use of capital letters or emotional language. Images Is there a video or are there pictures in the story? Check them using a reverse image search tool. Find a list of fact checking websites here. The European Commission's support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. www.mega.bupnet.eu COMPILATION BY TOPIC An overview of the chapters presented in the following. You can use the tabs on the left while scrolling to know which chapter you are currently reading. Legislation Policy Culture Finances EU legislation is one of Myths from various Myths about the EU Popular myths like the the most popular policy areas such as interfering & under- Euro (€) being dysfun- myths’ objects in many environment, health mining its Member ctional and to blame European countries. care, security or justice. States’ traditions and for the rising prices culture Quality Health Democracy Brexit of Life Care Myths which blame EU Myths about the EU Myths surrounding the Stories about how EU for worsening our well- not being a democratic hottest media news is using Covid19 to being, like lowering union or even the dic- regarding the EU, e.g. push compulsory food standards. tatorship of Brussels. the Pound being vaccination and other worthless after Brexit. misleading information. Functioning Environ- Religion Migration of the EU ment Myths from EU being How Germany exploits Topic of environment The most common anti-Christian to EU the EU for its own inte- seems innocent, but it myths about migration tolerating pedophile rests & the French laws is still surrounded by a like immigrants actions. are dictated by the EU. lot of fake stories. invading Europe. Country General Specific Achieve- Achieve- ments ments General Achievements Find more country- of the EU. specific succes stories, like ERASMUS+ experiences. The European Commission's support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. www.mega.bupnet.eu LEGISLATION In this chapter you will find myths from banning memes and GIFs to "made in Italy" products. EU legislation is one of the most popular Legislation myths’ objects in many European countries. If you want to grasp the real story you should first better understand how EU legislation works. In general, it is the European Commission that proposes new legislation, but it is the Council and Parliament that pass the laws (How the European Union works, 2005). Click to find more information about EU legislative procedure. LITHUANIA The EU has banned vacuum cleaners FALSE ________Vacuum cleaners have not been banned and new laws have been apassed for environmental reasons. The European Union has passed a resolution requiring vacuum cleaner manufacturers to switch to less energy-intensive vacuum cleaners. Powerful vacuum clea-ners consume significantly more electricity, are noisier and not economical. It is this transition that would save almost twice as much electricity in the countries of the European Union. Click reliable source The European Commission's support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. www.mega.bupnet.eu The EU has restricted freedom of expression online FALSE The myth of the EU's intention to restrict freedom of expression on the Internet has spread since the new copyright law. This law obliged social Legislation networks and platforms such as Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, and others to ensure that user-generated content does not violate copyright. Many have feared that these online platforms will have to install automatic filters which will block not only content that is illegal but also content that is allowed, because filters will not be able to distinguish between legal and illegal. Critics believe that this would violate freedom of expression online. On the other hand, the EU makes it clear that existing works can be used throughout Europe for citation, critique, review, caricature and parody purposes. Facebook, Google, and other platforms themselves can decide how to enforce copyright law while leaving the means of expression to the users. Check reliable source European Union banned children from inflating balloons FALSE In 2011, the media reported that the European Union had banned children from inflating balloons. News portals reported that EU officials saw a deadly threat in the simplest toys such as inflatable balloons. In fact, the EU Toy Safety Directive aims to protect children's health and the requirements are to reduce the amount of harmful chemicals in toys as well as update instruction for the use. The EU has not banned children from inflating balloons but has demanded that latex balloons be accompanied by a warning that children under the age of 8 be supervised by their parents when inflating balloons. This warning is intended to protect children from suffocation or choking on such a toy. Check reliable source The European Commission's support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. www.mega.bupnet.eu National flags have been banned in the EU Parliament FALSE _________News about banned national flags in the European Parliament has been seen on social networks and in the media. Representatives of Britain Legislation announced on their social networks that the national flag had been removed from their benches, called the gesture a ban on national symbols, and welcomed their withdrawal from the union. A Danish spokesman, meanwhile, said the speaker of the parliament "clearly hates nation-states." In fact, the order that there should be no objects including the flags on the tables in the Chamber has been in place for a long time. The President of Parliament has merely recalled this procedure, and the flags of the Member States have been put on the sides of the Chamber and are therefore not prohibited.
Recommended publications
  • A Success Story Or a Failure? : Representing the European Integration in the Curricula and Textbooks of Five Countries

    A Success Story Or a Failure? : Representing the European Integration in the Curricula and Textbooks of Five Countries

    I Inari Sakki A Success Story or a Failure? Representing the European Integration in the Curricula and Textbooks of Five Countries II Social psychological studies 25 Publisher: Social Psychology, Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki Editorial Board: Klaus Helkama, Chair Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti, Editor Karmela Liebkind Anna-Maija Pirttilä-Backman Kari Mikko Vesala Maaret Wager Jukka Lipponen Copyright: Inari Sakki and Unit of Social Psychology University of Helsinki P.O. Box 4 FIN-00014 University of Helsinki I wish to thank the many publishers who have kindly given the permission to use visual material from their textbooks as illustrations of the analysis. All efforts were made to find the copyright holders, but sometimes without success. Thus, I want to apologise for any omissions. ISBN 978-952-10-6423-4 (Print) ISBN 978-952-10-6424-1 (PDF) ISSN 1457-0475 Cover design: Mari Soini Yliopistopaino, Helsinki, 2010 III ABSTRAKTI Euroopan yhdentymisprosessin edetessä ja syventyessä kasvavat myös vaatimukset sen oikeutuksesta. Tästä osoituksena ovat muun muassa viimeaikaiset mediassa käydyt keskustelut EU:n perustuslakiäänestysten seurauksista, kansalaisten EU:ta ja euroa kohtaan osoittamasta ja tuntemasta epäluottamuksesta ja Turkin EU-jäsenyydestä. Taloudelliset ja poliittiset argumentit tiiviimmän yhteistyön puolesta eivät aina riitä kansalaisten tuen saamiseen ja yhdeksi ratkaisuksi on esitetty yhteisen identiteetin etsimistä. Eurooppalaisen identiteetin sanotaan voivan parhaiten muodostua silloin, kun perheen, koulutuksen
  • European Stability Mechanism

    European Stability Mechanism

    ~FACTSHEET~ European Stability Mechanism The Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) has been ratified by all 17 euro area member states. It entered into force on 27 September 2012, nine months earlier than initially foreseen 1. The treaty was signed by euro area member states on 2 February 2012. The ESM board of governors held its inaugural meeting on 8 October 2012. The ESM is an intergovernmental institution based in Luxembourg, set up to provide financial assistance to eurozone member states experiencing, or being threatened by, severe financing problems, if this is indispensable for safeguarding financial stability in the euro area as a whole. The initial maximum lending capacity of the ESM is set at €500 billion. This is achieved with subscribed capital of €700 billion (€ 80 billion paid-in capital, the rest callable). A first version of the treaty was signed on 11 July 2011, but it was subsequently modified to incorporate decisions taken by the heads of state and government of the euro area on 21 July and 9 December 2011 to improve the effectiveness of the mechanism. As a permanent mechanism, the ESM will take over the tasks currently fulfilled by the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM). With the accelerated entry into force, the ESM will now operate alongside the EFSF for nine months. In March 2012, the Eurogroup agreed to raise the overall ceiling for ESM/EFSF lending to €700 billion 2. Already during the transitional period, until mid-2013, the ESM will be the main instrument for the financing of new programmes.
  • EUROPEAN UNION the EU Celebrates the Awarding of the 2012

    EUROPEAN UNION the EU Celebrates the Awarding of the 2012

    EUROPEAN UNION Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Lebanon Beirut, 6 December 2012 Press Release The EU celebrates the awarding of the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize with Lebanese youth On the occasion of the awarding of the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize to the European Union and to celebrate International and European Human Rights Day, the Delegation of the European Union to Lebanon and the Lebanese University are organising a panel debate on the topic of "Peace and Reconciliation". The event will take place on Monday 10 December at the Lebanese University Central Administration in presence of Ambassadors of the EU Member States, representatives of the Justice and Human Rights Parliamentary Committees, students and academics, civil society and media. The Nobel Prize Committee has decided to award the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize to the European Union for over six decades' contribution to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe. The award ceremony takes place in Oslo on 10 December, where the President of the European Council Herman Von Rompuy, the President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso and the President of the European Parliament Martin Schulz will receive the prize. Four young Europeans, winners of the online contest on the subject of "Peace" organised by the European Union, will be joining the delegation of the EU in Oslo to collect the award. The European Union will give the award money (€930 000) to projects supporting children who are victims of war and conflicts. The Delegation of the European Union to Lebanon has also chosen to engage with youth to celebrate the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize.
  • Financial Market Integration in the EU: a Practical Inventory of Benefits and Hurdles in the Single Market

    Financial Market Integration in the EU: a Practical Inventory of Benefits and Hurdles in the Single Market

    Financial market integration in the EU: A practical inventory of benefits and hurdles in the Single Market Financial market integration in the EU: A practical inventory of benefits and hurdles in the Single Market Imprint: © 2019 Bertelsmann Stiftung/ ESMT European School of Management ESMT Berlin (Hrsg.) and Technology Schlossplatz 1 Authors: 10178 Berlin Katharina Gnath, Bertelsmann Stiftung Germany Benjamin Große-Rüschkamp, ESMT Berlin Christian Kastrop, Bertelsmann Stiftung Editing: Dominic Ponattu, Bertelsmann Stiftung David Gow Jörg Rocholl, ESMT Berlin Marcus Wortmann, Bertelsmann Stiftung Title image: Andrew Malone/Networking/flickr.com – CC BY 2.0, Bertelsmann Stiftung https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Programme Europe’s Future Carl-Bertelsmann-Str. 256 33311 Gütersloh Germany Financial market integration in the EU | Page 3 Contents 1 Abstract ............................................................................................................ 5 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 6 3 On the benefits of a single market for capital and finance in Europe: A review of effects and channels .................................................... 7 3.1 Definition and history of financial integration in Europe .............................................................. 7 3.2 Theoretical benefits and channels of financial integration .......................................................... 8 3.3 Potential caveats of financial integration
  • Directorate-General for Competition 16/03/2021

    Directorate-General for Competition 16/03/2021

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION – DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR COMPETITION 16/03/2021 Chief Economist Assistants 01 Commission Priorities and Tobias MAASS Pierre REGIBEAU Director-General Strategic Coordination Agata MAZURKIEWICZ Adviser Antitrust CE.1:Empirical analysis in complex CE.2: Economic analysis in Olivier GUERSENT merger and antitrust cases merger, antitrust and Astrid COUSIN HR Business Correspondent State aid cases Harold NYSSENS 1) Svend ALBAEK Pierre REGIBEAU f.f. Claes BENGTSSON (Deputy to the Director) Principal Adviser: Ex-post economic evaluation Thomas DEISENHOFER Adviser State aid Deputy Director-General Adviser Antitrust Deputy Director-General Deputy Director-General Pascal SCHLOESSLEN Adviser Mergers MERGERS & Cartels Henri PIFFAUT* Dirk VAN ERPS ANTITRUST STATE AID Olivier GUERSENT f.f. Linsey MCCALLUM Carles ESTEVA MOSSO A G R Policy and Strategy H Inge BERNAERTS Cartels Horizontal Management Maria JASPERS State aid: General Scrutiny and Maria VELENTZA Enforcement Adviser Consumer Liaison Ales MUSIL G/1 Cartels I Karl SOUKUP Corinne DUSSART-LEFRET A/1 Antitrust case support and (Deputy to the Director) R/1 Registry and Transparency Glykeria DEMATAKI policy G/2 Cartels II H/1 Infrastructure and Regional aid Sophie MOONEN Hubert DE BROCA Brigitta RENNER-LOQUENZ R/2 Finance and Internal Compliance A/2 Mergers case support and H/2 R&D&I, IPCEI Sari SUURNAKKI G/3 Cartels III (Deputy to the Director) policy Claudia DE CESARIS and environment Inge BERNAERTS f.f. Demos SPATHARIS (Deputy to the Director) R/3 Information technology G/4 Cartels IV Leontina SANDU A/3 State aid case support and Gerald MIERSCH policy H/3 Fiscal aid Karl SOUKUP f.f.
  • Payments and Market Infrastructure Two Decades After the Start of the European Central Bank Editor: Daniela Russo

    Payments and Market Infrastructure Two Decades After the Start of the European Central Bank Editor: Daniela Russo

    Payments and market infrastructure two decades after the start of the European Central Bank Editor: Daniela Russo July 2021 Contents Foreword 6 Acknowledgements 8 Introduction 9 Prepared by Daniela Russo Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, a 21st century renaissance man 13 Prepared by Daniela Russo and Ignacio Terol Alberto Giovannini and the European Institutions 19 Prepared by John Berrigan, Mario Nava and Daniela Russo Global cooperation 22 Prepared by Daniela Russo and Takeshi Shirakami Part 1 The Eurosystem as operator: TARGET2, T2S and collateral management systems 31 Chapter 1 – TARGET 2 and the birth of the TARGET family 32 Prepared by Jochen Metzger Chapter 2 – TARGET 37 Prepared by Dieter Reichwein Chapter 3 – TARGET2 44 Prepared by Dieter Reichwein Chapter 4 – The Eurosystem collateral management 52 Prepared by Simone Maskens, Daniela Russo and Markus Mayers Chapter 5 – T2S: building the European securities market infrastructure 60 Prepared by Marc Bayle de Jessé Chapter 6 – The governance of TARGET2-Securities 63 Prepared by Cristina Mastropasqua and Flavia Perone Chapter 7 – Instant payments and TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) 72 Prepared by Carlos Conesa Eurosystem-operated market infrastructure: key milestones 77 Part 2 The Eurosystem as a catalyst: retail payments 79 Chapter 1 – The Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) revolution: how the vision turned into reality 80 Prepared by Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell Contents 1 Chapter 2 – Legal and regulatory history of EU retail payments 87 Prepared by Maria Chiara Malaguti Chapter 3 –
  • Implementing the Protocol 36 Opt

    Implementing the Protocol 36 Opt

    September 2012 Opting out of EU Criminal law: What is actually involved? Alicia Hinarejos, J.R. Spencer and Steve Peers CELS Working Paper, New Series, No.1 http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/publications/working_papers.php Centre for European Legal Studies • 10 West Road • Cambridge CB3 9DZ Telephone: 01223 330093 • Fax: 01223 330055 • http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Protocol 36 to the Lisbon Treaty gives the UK the right to opt out en bloc of all the police and criminal justice measures adopted under the Treaty of Maastricht ahead of the date when the Court of Justice of the EU at Luxembourg will acquire jurisdiction in relation to them. The government is under pressure to use this opt-out in order to “repatriate criminal justice”. It is rumoured that this opt-out might be offered as a less troublesome alternative to those are calling for a referendum on “pulling out of Europe”. Those who advocate the Protocol 36 opt-out appear to assume that it would completely remove the UK from the sphere of EU influence in matters of criminal justice and that the opt-out could be exercised cost-free. In this Report, both of these assumptions are challenged. It concludes that if the opt-out were exercised the UK would still be bound by a range of new police and criminal justice measures which the UK has opted into after Lisbon. And it also concludes that the measures opted out of would include some – notably the European Arrest Warrant – the loss of which could pose a risk to law and order.
  • Should Poland Join the Euro? an Economic and Political Analysis

    Should Poland Join the Euro? an Economic and Political Analysis

    Should Poland Join the Euro? An Economic and Political Analysis Should Poland Join the Euro? An Economic and Political Analysis Graduate Policy Workshop February 2016 Michael Carlson Conor Carroll Iris Chan Geoff Cooper Vanessa Lehner Kelsey Montgomery Duc Tran Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ i About the WWS Graduate Policy Workshop ........................................................................................ ii Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 2 The Evolution of Polish Thought on Euro Adoption ................................................................. 5 2.1 Pre-EU membership reforms ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 After EU Accession ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Crisis years ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Post-crisis assessment ..................................................................................................................................
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.6.2021 C(2021)

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.6.2021 C(2021)

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.6.2021 C(2021) 3675 final ANNEX ANNEX to the Commission Implementing Decision adopting the Joint Research Centre’s work programme for 2021-2022 under Decision of the Council on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, and Council Regulation (Euratom) establishing the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for the period 2021-2025 complementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation EN EN ANNEX The Joint Research Centre’s work programme for 2021-2022 I. Introduction As the European Commission’s science and knowledge service, the Joint Research Centre (JRC) supports Commission services by providing evidence for smarter policies. This annex to the Commission implementing decision presents the JRC’s work programme for 2021 and 2022. The 2021-2022 work programme: supports the Commission’s political priorities and high-level objectives, and the Commission’s 2021 work programme; contributes to the key strategic orientations of the Horizon Europe Strategic Plan for 2021-2024 as stated therein and implements the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe concerning the direct actions of the JRC; contributes to the general and specific objectives of the Euratom research and training programme 2021-2025, namely to undertake nuclear research and training activities focusing on the continuous improvement of nuclear safety, security and radiation protection, as well as to complement the achievement of Horizon Europe’s objectives inter alia in the context of the energy transition. takes account of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the steps the Commission has taken in its aftermath, including the EU recovery plan (COM(2020) 456 final); is funded either by institutional resources (i.e.
  • Five Students in One Room P.24 2 >> Liefdewerk >> BAS + BOARD GAMES Bas Kempen, Soil Geography Team at Alterra

    Five Students in One Room P.24 2 >> Liefdewerk >> BAS + BOARD GAMES Bas Kempen, Soil Geography Team at Alterra

    ‘Just publish the Bare rooms but a No more studying dangerous virus’ cosy atmosphere for fun! The risk of replication by First experiences with the Proposed: Recruitment cap for terrorists is nil. | p.9 | Open Offi ce. | p.18 | degrees with no job prospects. | p.22 | RESOURCEFor students and employees of Wageningen UR nr. 11 – 26 January 2012 – 6th Volume How students live around the world Five students in one room p.24 2 >> liefdewerk >> BAS + BOARD GAMES Bas Kempen, Soil Geography team at Alterra ‘I am a pretty bad loser’ Forget simple quiz games like Tell- me. But you can always interest Bas Kempen in a more complex board game. He and his group of fellow gameologists gather to play at least once a week. ‘Games that you have to work at. With lots of interaction and the smallest possi- ble element of luck.’ So the best games are strategic ones like Domi- nant Species. Played for fun, natu- rally. ‘But it is about winning too of course.’ RK / Foto: Guy Ackermans RESOURCE — 26 januari 2012 ILLUSTRATIE COVER: HENNY BOOGERT >>CONTENTS nr. 11 – 6th Volume >> 12 >> 16 >> 28 OVERFLOWING GARBAGE BIN LIKE AN ANGEL RODEO IN TEXAS Nobody wants it, but we still waste A high-speed camera reveals the Annika enjoyed life on the ranch, more than a third of our food. workings of the wings of the dove. but not the narrow-mindedness. AND MORE... 2 Labour of love SHAME board games Ever hopeful, I serve my young sons a hot meal every evening, but give or take a 4 News and opinion couple of spoonfuls, Papa’s labour of love usually ends up in the bin.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.12.2019 COM(2019)

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.12.2019 COM(2019)

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.12.2019 COM(2019) 638 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE WORKING OF COMMITTEES DURING 2018 {SWD(2019) 441 final} EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE WORKING OF COMMITTEES DURING 2018 In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers1 (the ‘Comitology Regulation’), the Commission hereby presents the annual report on the working of committees for 2018. This report gives an overview of developments in the comitology system in 2018 and a summary of the committees’ activities. It is accompanied by a staff working document containing detailed statistics on the work of the individual committees. 1. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE COMITOLOGY SYSTEM IN 2018 1.1. General development As described in the 2013 annnual report2, all comitology procedures provided for in the ‘old’ Comitology Decision3, with the exception of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, were automatically adapted to the new comitology procedures provided for in the Comitology Regulation. In 2018, the comitology committees were therefore operating under the procedures set out in the Comitology Regulation, i.e. advisory (Article 4) and examination (Article 5), as well as under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny set out in Article 5a of the Comitology Decision. The Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 20164 recalls, in its point 27, the need to align the regulatory procedure with scrutiny: ‘The three institutions acknowledge the need for the alignment of all existing legislation to the legal framework introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, and in particular the need to give high priority to the prompt alignment of all basic acts which still refer to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
  • Focus on Cities and Metro Regions 13 Focus on Cities and Metro Regions

    Focus on Cities and Metro Regions 13 Focus on Cities and Metro Regions

    Focus on cities and metro regions 13 Focus on cities and metro regions This chapter describes two linked typologies which have Step 2: the contiguous (1) high-density cells are then clus- been developed to cover, without any overlaps or omissions, tered, gaps (2) are filled and only the clusters with a popula- the whole geographical territory of the European Union tion of at least 50 000 inhabitants (image 2 of Figure 13.1) are (EU), Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Croatia at the local kept as an ‘urban centre’. and regional level. The typologies cover: Step 3: all the municipalities (local administrative units level • the definition of a city and its commuting zone, and; 2 (LAU2)) with at least half their population inside the urban • a typology of metro regions. centre are selected as candidates to become part of the city As opposed to the typologies presented in the territorial ty- (image 3 of Figure 13.1). pologies chapter of the 2012 edition of Eurostat’s regional Step 4: the city is defined ensuring that: yearbook (the degree of urbanisation and the urban–rural regional typology) which rely mainly on population density, • there is a link to the political level; the two typologies presented in this chapter add a functional • at least 50 % of the population lives in an urban centre, and; dimension. They are both forms of functional urban areas • at least 75 % of the population of the urban centre lives in a and are based on the flows of people commuting to work in city (image 4 of Figure 13.1).