DOCSLIB.ORG

Speed of Light and Other Stellar Effects” - Oct 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Speed of Light and Other Stellar Effects” - Oct 2017 “The speed of light and other stellar effects” - Oct 2017 This month our talk was by Bruce Vickery, who took us on a fascinating voyage of astronomical discovery related to the period from the late 1600's to the mid 1700's. The “Speed of Light” was a significant thread in the talk and the speaker began with Galileo's failed attempt of the early 1600's where he tried to arrive at a result by timing light over about two miles. Moving on, the first person to measure the speed of light was Ole Romer, a Danish astronomer who was studying the orbit of Io, the innermost satellite of Jupiter. Romer correctly deduced that difficulties he had in timing this orbit were related to light taking longer to reach earth when Jupiter was further away in its orbit. Working backwards from the observational data he arrived at a speed of 200,000 km/ sec. Although around 33% incorrect – attributed later to the imprecise dimensions of the Solar System known at the time - Romer became the first person in history to measure the speed of light. The scene then shifts to the creation of Greenwich Royal Observatory and the development of precision measurements of the celestial sphere. In particular, the talk focusses on the investigation of the behaviour of Gamma Draconis. This star is in the zenith over London and is a prime candidate for measuring any small movements that a star may make. Stellar Parallax was of particular interest as although Copernicus hypothesised a helio-centric universe in 1543, to date no one had found any proof that this was correct. Existence of Stellar Parallax would confirm this. It was Robert Hooke in 1669 who invented the Zenith Telescope to study Gamma Draconis in more detail and he noted that the star “moved by more than 1/100th of a degree” between early July and late October that year. Although compelling evidence for parallax, until a whole year's data is obtained the question remains open. Hooke went on to design the Monument to the Great Fire in London as a 202ft Zenith Telescope it being hollow from the basement to a trapdoor at the top that could be opened to reveal the sky. But the monument vibrated under the influence of London traffic and he was unable to carry out any scientific experiments. John Flamsteed in Greenwich built a Zenith Telescope into an existing well in 1679 but there is a record of his making only one observation. The problem lay dormant for the better part of 50 years until it was again addressed, this time by two individuals called Samuel Molyneux and James Bradley. Molyneux was a rich “amateur” astronomer, and Bradley was a trained observational astronomer. Molyneux funded a 24ft Zenith Telescope that was attached to a chimney of his mansion at Kew and Bradley ran the experiment. After one year's observation Gamma Draconis was shown to indeed move with time – in an almost cyclical manner – but this could not be mathematically related to parallax – something else was happening. Bradley took stock and realised that the telescope they were using was not suitable to carry the experiment forward. It had so little travel at its lower end that only two stars could be observed. Using a star catalogue Bradley established that if the lower end of the telescope could be moved by 5 degrees in each direction over 70 stars could be observed. He further noted that he would be able to see Capella – one of the brightest stars in the sky – if the movement was over 6¼ degrees. He therefore had a new, 12½ ft Zenith Telescope made, but he had this installed in the house in which he was living with his aunt, in Wanstead. He wanted to make copious measurements and by having it where he lived he would not have the difficulty of travel to Kew. He began using this telescope in August 1727. He measured over 50 stars and at least 10 on a very regular basis. Unfortunately, Samuel Molyneux, whilst in attendance at the House of Commons where he was an MP, fell seriously ill in April 1728 and he died a few days later. This is particularly sad as Bradley was on the cusp of making one of the greatest discoveries in the history of celestial dynamics. Bradley came to a conclusion on his discovery in late 1728 when sailing with a friend on the Thames. By comparing the constant wind on the Thames with the constant light stream from Gamma Draconis, the movement of the yacht with that of the earth in its orbit, and the slight movements of a vane on the yacht mast with a telescope trained on Gamma Draconis (having to be moved as the earth changed direction in its orbit) Bradley came up with a theory now known as the “Aberration of Light”. He correctly deduced that when the earth is moving in a non parallel manner to the light from a star that the telescope would have to be tilted slightly to receive the light from that star. He calculated that the largest angle that the telescope would have to be tilted by – when the earth was moving perpendicularly to the light from the star – was 20.2 seconds of arc. This value is called the Constant of Aberration and is denoted by the Greek letter Kappa. Its currently accepted value is 20.49552 seconds of arc, less than 1.5% different from Bradley's initial result. Knowing this angle, Bradley found the speed of light to be 20,210 times the speed of the earth in its orbit. Bradley, however, did not give a value for the speed of light in his 1729 paper. It relies on a knowledge of the radius of the orbit of the earth. Perhaps Bradley was not sufficiently convinced that the then known value for this quantity was of sufficient accuracy for him to quote a speed of light. But what is evident is that given an accurate radius, Bradley's data yields a result within 1.5% of the currently accepted value. Bradley noted that the movements of Gamma Draconis were more complex than could be explained by the Aberration of Light so he kept his experiment going – indeed he ran it until 1747 – over 20 years since he started out with Molyneux in 1725. In 1747 Bradley published a second paper on his experiment as the secondary effects on the movement of the star were found to be related to “Nutation” - a wobbling of the earth's axis due to the gravitational pull of the moon. One of the cycles of the moon is 18.6 years long – hence the length of time Bradley needed to take observational measurements to see this effect. In his personal life, Bradley became Savilian Professor of Astronomy at the University of Oxford in 1721, and the third Astronomer Royal at Greenwich in 1742, both of which posts he held to his dying day – in 1762. His telescope still hangs today on a wall in the Meridian House at Greenwich where it can be seen by the public. The talk was made all the more interesting as Bruce illustrated all of the stellar movements by simulating them in software and we were able to see exactly what all of the researchers were doing in a practical way. For example, we give an image below of the movements of Gamma Draconis over the 20 years that Bradley observed it from the house in Wanstead. He had to unravel both Aberration of Light and Nutation from this complex movement – and, indeed, a similar movement exhibited in the over 50 stars that he observed. A truly remarkable feat. Above image – Bradley's Telescope at Greenwich. Complex movement of Gamma Draconis between 1726 and 1747. Finally, Bruce noted that he believed that the current exhibit at Greenwich “did not do justice” to a telescope that made two of the greatest discoveries of all time in the field of Celestial Dynamics. Footnotes 1. Bishop's Transcripts at the Gloucestershire Archives tell us that Bradley was baptised on 3rd October 1692. Unfortunately it is widely reported that he was born in March 1693, which is incorrect. The date 1693 also incorrectly appears on his Gravestone. 2. The mansion of Samuel Molyneux in Kew Gardens has long since been demolished. There is a plaque noting its position as the “White House”. 3. His address in Wanstead is marked by a green plaque, but the house he occupied was demolished and replaced by the property that now stands there. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ellis Wasson the British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 2
    Ellis Wasson The British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 2 Ellis Wasson The British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 2 Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Łukasz Połczyński ISBN 978-3-11-056238-5 e-ISBN 978-3-11-056239-2 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. © 2017 Ellis Wasson Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Łukasz Połczyński www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © Thinkstock/bwzenith Contents The Entries VII Abbreviations IX List of Parliamentary Families 1 Bibliography 619 Appendices Appendix I. Families not Included in the Main List 627 Appendix II. List of Parliamentary Families Organized by Country 648 Indexes Index I. Index of Titles and Family Names 711 Index II. Seats of Parliamentary Families Organized by Country 769 Index III. Seats of Parliamentary Families Organized by County 839 The Entries “ORIGINS”: Where reliable information is available about the first entry of the family into the gentry, the date of the purchase of land or holding of office is provided. When possible, the source of the wealth that enabled the family’s election to Parliament for the first time is identified. Inheritance of property that supported participation in Parliament is delineated.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering the Heavens
    Engineering the Heavens Pre-photographic astronomers first measured the distances to stars using their eyeballs, thanks to superb engineering by astronomical instrument-makers by Trudy E. Bell LANCE UP on a clear starlit night, and the as big as possible to gather light from faint objects deep in stars seem stationary in their constellations— space for hand-drawing their physical appearance. Instead, no wonder for millennia they were even called these single-purpose instruments of precision (as they “fixed” stars, reassuringly useful as aids to ter- came to be called) were sometimes not even recognizable restrial navigation and surveying. But careful as astronomical instruments: their telescope tubes were g observ- possibly fixed in one ers from the 17th position or perhaps through the 19th obscured by frames, Centuries vigilantly wheels, clamps, mi- monitored the posi- croscopes, handles, tions of stars night circles with num- after night, year bers, bubble levels, after year, decade plumb bobs, small after decade. They pools of mercury, discovered that all or lanterns for illu- those points of light minating crosshairs have their own mo- made from spider- tions in three di- web [Fig. 1]. mensions—away or All the finely towards the earth, counterbalanced ma- across the sky, chinery may have around one anoth- even been invented er—all in the invis- for a specific astro- ible thrall of gravity. nomical task, and In so doing, they was built by optical also unexpectedly and mechanical arti- discovered impor- sans who came to be tant physical mo- as famous as the as- tions of the earth it- Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Roderick O'flaherty's Letters
    Created on 5 March 2013 at 16.29 hours page iii RODERICKO’FLAHERTY’S LETTERS TOWILLIAMMOLYNEUX, EDWARDLHWYD, ANDSAMUELMOLYNEUX, 1696 –1709 edited with notes and an introduction by RICHARDSHARPE DUBLIN 2013 Created on 5 March 2013 at 16.29 hours page v CONTENTS Preface vii Réamhfhocal le Nollaig Ó Muraíle xi Rhagair gan Brynley F. Roberts xiii Illustrations of O’Flaherty’s Hand xiv Family Trees xvi Abbreviations xvii I Roderick O’Flaherty’s Life The Writings of Roderick O’Flaherty Letters in Roderick O’Flaherty’s Time Correspondence with William Molyneux Correspondence with Edward Lhwyd Lhwyd’s Archaeologia Britannica Nicolson’s Scottish Historical Library O’Flaherty’s Ogygia Vindicated Correspondence with Samuel Molyneux The Fate of O’Flaherty’s Manuscripts Note on the Text as Presented Letters to William Molyneux – Letters to Edward Lhwyd – Samuel Molyneux Correspondence – A O’Flaherty’s Revised Latin Poem for Lhwyd Books Cited or Used by O’Flaherty Copies of Ogygia Manuscripts from the Southwell Papers I L C O D v Created on 5 March 2013 at 16.29 hours page vi B Manuscripts in O’Flaherty’s Hand Works Printed No Later than Works Printed since G I vi Created on 5 March 2013 at 16.39 hours page 1 INTRODUCTION S seven miles westward from Galway is the townland of Park, between Furbogh and Spiddal; here for many years lived Roderick O’Flaherty, author of Ogygia; seu, Rerum Hibernicarum chronologia. The remains of his house were visited in by John O’Donovan, who had been working closely and respectfully with another of O’Flaherty’s books, The Territory of West Connaught or Hiar Con- naught, and he was much moved by this visit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Speed of Light Before Einstein
    Over 200 years passed between the first announcement that light travels at a finite velocity and the publishing of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, which entrenched this speed as a fundamental constant of the physical laws that govern our universe. This paper will focus on specific scientists and their efforts to determine the speed of light during this time period. The investigations of the contributing figures will revolve around describing their experiments, evaluating the relative accuracy of their methods, and their determinations’ respective physical or astronomical significances. In general the paper will follow the trend of increased accuracy in speed of light determinations; however, the physical and astronomical significance of each experiment is not so progressively ordered. Increasingly more accurate astronomical values of the speed of light pushed astronomical precision to new heights. Corrections to the speed of light improved planetary and stellar tables, providing astronomers with the ability to investigate phenomena which had previously been difficult to isolate because of the conflation of effects. The advent of terrestrial determinations of the speed of light allowed astronomers to improve accuracy of different constants while still offering similar potential to confirm or negate theory. Perhaps with the sole exclusion of length, all measurement is theory mediated, and as such, we must look to science to supply a robust theoretical basis from which we can convert observations into measurements. Scientific theory provides a framework within which we can interpret data and by which we may achieve indirect measures. More direct measures of the same quantity provide an opportunity to evaluate the assumptions present in prior measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Praise for Parallax
    Praise for Parallax “An accessible and charming history of how we know what we know about our place among the stars.” —Providence Journal “Alan Hirshfeld’s engaging account moves to a satisfying climax as the exciting race to find stellar parallax heats up. It’s a thrilling detective story!” —Owen Gingerich, Research Professor of Astronomy and the History of Science, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics “An enthralling, behind-the-scenes glimpse into the lives of . .. heroic stargazers.” —Science News “Writing in the genre of Dava Sobels Longitude, Hirshfeld sheds light on the important problem of finding our cosmic place.” —David Levy, science editor, Parade “[Parallax shows] historic figures as people, full of false hopes, fear of failure, jealousy, victory, and joy. This comprehensive work... will appeal to astronomy buffs and curious readers alike.” —Astronomy “Alan Hirshfeld’s authoritative and gripping tale of the search for stellar parallax makes me proud to be a part of such a relentlessly curious and persistent species.” —Chet Raymo, columnist, The Boston Globe, author of 365 Starry Nights, and professor of physics and astronomy at Stonehill College in North Easton, Massachusetts “This book is not just a keeper; it will also become a gift.” —Sky & Telescope “In this thrilling history of the search for parallax, Hirshfeld urges us to ‘fly together.’ The human failures and frustrations and the crucial discoveries in the quest for parallax are as thrilling as the story of the determination of longitude, and just as important.” —Jane Langton, author of two astronomical mystery novels, Dark Nantucket Moon and The Shortest Day “I thoroughly enjoyed reading this excellent book.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Earth Moves Transcript
    How the Earth Moves Transcript Date: Wednesday, 2 April 2014 - 1:00PM Location: Museum of London 02 April 2014 How the Earth Moves Professor Carolin Crawford HISTORY There are many simple observations anyone can make with the unaided eye and enough patience: day turns into night turns into day in an endless cycle; the Sun and the Moon follow a set path across the sky from East to West; the Moon changes not only in its position against the stars from one night to the next, but also in its phase. During the night we can observe that the positions of the stars relative to one another remain fixed in an unchanging tapestry; however, this pattern moves across the sky from east to west in a slow but continuous motion; and from one night to the next the same stars rise a few minutes earlier than the previous night. This daily four-minute shift of which stars are rising leads to a cumulative effect over a few months that means which stars are visible at any time of night depends on the season, and it takes a full year for the sky to look the exactly the same at the same time again. These predictable patterns of behaviour enabled ancient cultures to develop an agricultural calendar, where the first appearance of certain stars in the sky could mark the appropriate time to either sow or harvest a crop. Archaeological records have shown that civilisations tracked key changes in the behaviour of celestial bodies through the year, as reflected in some of the alignments of old stones, or the way sunlight would fall across markings.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallax and Aberration
    Seeing Earth’s Orbit in the Stars: Parallax and Aberration Todd Timberlake, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA During the 17th century the idea of an orbiting and rotating Earth became increasingly popular, but opponents of this view continued to point out that the theory had observable consequences that had never, in fact, been observed.1 Why, for instance, had astronomers failed to detect the annual parallax of the stars that must occur if Earth orbits the Sun? To address this problem, astronomers of the 17th and18th centuries sought to measure the annual parallax of stars using telescopes. None of them succeeded. Annual stellar parallax was not successfully measured until 1838, when Friedrich Bessel detected the parallax of the star 61 Cygni.2 But the early failures to detect annual stellar parallax led to the discovery of a new (and entirely unexpected) phenomenon: the aberration of starlight. This paper recounts the story of the discovery of stellar aberration. It is accompanied by a set of activities and computer simulations that allow students to explore this fascinating historical episode and learn important lessons about the nature of science.3 Parallax Hold up your thumb in front of your face at arm’s length. Close your right eye and view your thumb against the background. Now open your right eye and close your left: you will see your thumb appear to move against the background. The apparent displacement of your thumb is really caused by the displacement of your observing location (from your left eye to your right). This phenomenon, known as parallax, plays an important role in astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Molyneux, Earls of Sefton
    MEMOIR OF THE MOLINEUX FAMILY MEMOIR OF THE MOLINEUX FAMILY BY GISBORNE MOLINEUX, F.R.C.I. For Prz1•ate Cz1'cztlatzon onl)'. 1882. ~ ../!!:_.A:, .tZ.- -~- "C _--...-c_ ~ ?.~ ?. -- ,/Z ~~·~ • • . ........ • " There is a history in all men's lives." Henry IV., Part II. " Lives of great men all remind us We can make our lives sublime, And, departing, leave behind us, Footprints on the sands of time; '' Footprints that perhaps another, Sailing o'er life's solemn main, _!\ forlorn and shipwrecked brother, Seeing, shall take heart again." Longftll<rdl. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PAGE THE HOUSE OF SEFTON • I PEDIGREE No. I. CH.A.PTER II. THE H.-UTGHTON OR TEVERSAL BRANCH, WITH THAT OF THORPE 30 PEDIGREE No. 2. CHAPTER III. THE STAFFORDSHIRE AND SUSSEX FAMILIES OF THE TEVERSAL BRANCH 62 PEDIGREE No. 3. CHAPTER IV. THE CASTLE DILLON BRANCH CHAPTER V. THE NAME OF 1IOLYNEUX, ARMS, CRESTS, ETC. 88 APPENDIX • • 103 No. 1. PEDIGREE OF MOLYNEUX, EARLS OF SEFTON. FROM THE CONQUEST TO TEM:P. HENRY VI. William de Monlins, Lord of the Manors of Sephton, Thornton, andi. Kuerdou, at the time of the Conquest. :~ Vivum de Moulins, = Siwarda. son and heir, L;ord of Sephton. \ i Adam de Molines, = Annota, daughter and son and hew,, Lord of I heir of Benedict le Ger- Sephton ancli Speke. net, Lord of Speke. Robert de Molyneux, = Beatrix, daughter and heir of Gil~ert. hkld land of his Hen~ held land of his Siwarda became the Lord of Sephton, son and heir. [ Robert de Villers, Lord of Crosby. brother ~, knightly service.
    [Show full text]
  • S of Sefton Are Lmried B,·Neath the Western Window
    ST. CnAu's CnnrwrL KIRBY, KEAH LIVEHPOOL, EKc+LAKD The Earl and C1Junte,;s of Sefton are lmried b,·neath the western window. HISTORY GENEALOGICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL .... OF THE .... MOLYNEUX FAMILIES •... BY .... NELLIE ZADA RICE MOLYNEUX SYRACUSE, N. Y. C. W. BARDEEN, PUBLISHER 1904 COPYRIGHT, 1904 BY NELLIE ZADA RICE :MOLYNEUX !iCHOOLBULLET!NPRESS C, W.SARDEEN, SY/IACUSE, N.Y, ""'\Ve aim t.o know, If long ago, Our forefathers honors carried; And if they came In time to fame, And whom the maids they married." TO MY HUSBAND ROBERT A. MOLYNIWX A DESCENDANT OF THE BOURBONNAIS (3) l.'f PREFACE For many years I have been collecting material relating to the Molyneux Family. Omissions there are many, for it has been difficult to get response to letters; but many thanks are due to the kindly help and encouragement of Major General Edward L. Molyneux of Greater New York; Rear Admiral Sir Robert Molyneux, K.C.B.; Hon. William More Moly­ neux, Guildford, Sussex, England; Captain Joseph B. Molyneux of Cleveland, Ohio, U. S. A.; and Mr. Charles E. Molyneux, President of the Molyneux Historical Soci­ ety, Dushore, Pa. N. Z. R. M. SYRACUSE, N. Y., December, 1904. (5) AUTHORITIES FOR MOLYNEUX GENEALOGY Anderson, Royal Genealogy. Baines, History of Lancashire. Burke, Landed Gentry. Burke, Extinct Baronage. Burke, Extinct and Dormant Baronetcies. Burke, Peerage, Baronctage, and Knightage. Burke, Peerage. Camden. Collections of the Huguenot Society of America. Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica. Collins, Peerage. Complete Baronetage, Vol. I. Dictionary of National Biography. Dictionary of the Landed Gentry, Burke. Debrctt, Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage.
    [Show full text]