Abazin the Abkhaz in Search of Meadows Fortheir Herds in the N01thern Plains of the Cauca­ the Abazin Live in the Northern Caucasus Sus Mountains

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abazin the Abkhaz in Search of Meadows Fortheir Herds in the N01thern Plains of the Cauca­ the Abazin Live in the Northern Caucasus Sus Mountains A Abazin the Abkhaz in search of meadows fortheir herds in the n01thern plains of the Cauca­ The Abazin live in the Northern Caucasus sus Mountains. Some accounts say that region, particularly in the Adyghcya and they are a Black Sea people with strong ties Karachaevo-Cherkessia republics of the to Asia Minor as well. Yet others consider Russian Federation. They call themselves the Abazin a separate ethnic group and ex­ Abaza, Ashywua, or Ashkarywua, the lat­ plain the similarity of the Abazin and Ab­ ter two names referring to their two major khaz languages as the result of historical tribes. Historically, the Abazin have prac­ relations. Abazin dialects are understand­ ticed herding and some farming. They live able forAbkhaz speakers. on the northernparts of the Great Caucasus On the eve of the Russian Empire's range, in the valleys of the Kuma and Great campaign in the Caucasus, the numbers of and Little Zelenchuk rivers. They also live Abazin were estimated at around 45,000; on the northeastern shores of the Black Sea about 10,000 remained in Russian territory basin in a tier starting from Sochi down at the end of the 19th century. The Ashy­ to the borders of contemporary Abkhazia. wua subgroup consists of six families: Loo, The most recent data show their numbers Bibard, Darykua, Kylych, Jantemir, and in the Russian Federation near 40,000; K' achua. The Ashkarywua subgroup con­ smaller numbers also live in Turkey, Syria, sists of seven families: Bashylby, Barakey, and Jordan. The Abazin language belongs Mysylbiy, Kyzylby, Shegerey, T'am, and to the West Caucasian subgroup of the Bagh. In the faceof Russian forcesmost of North Caucasian language family, a sub­ the Ashkarywua fled to the Ottoman Em­ group consisting of Abazin (i.e., Abaza), pire in the second half of the 19th century. Abkhaz, Adygh, Kabardinian, and Ubykh They are now found in different parts of languages. The Abazin are Sunni Muslims. Turkey, Syria, and Jordan. They are often confused with the Abkhaz Abazin literature is predominantly oral, (Apsywua), a related people now resident identified with the epic tradition of the in Abkhazia. Some Circassians use the Caucasus nations. The first written forms term Abazin for Abkhaz living outside of of Abazin literature were published by Abkhazia, but the two populations should the famous Abazin literary figure Tobil be distinguished on the basis of the strong Talustan in 1920s in the Soviet Union. self-consciousness of the Abazin people The Abazin national movement tried to about their identity. establish a homeland within the Kara­ One theory says that in the distant past chaevo-Cherkessia Republic in 1991 but the Ashywua and Ashkarywua split from failed. Following a referendum in 2005, 2 I Abkhaz an Abazin national district was formed in and paganism have coexisted among the 2006. After a transitional period and reor­ Abkhaz for centuries, seven decades of ganization of the administrative districts in Soviet rule has created a largely nonreli­ northern Karachaevo-Cherkessia, in De­ gious people. In the 14th and 15th centu­ cember 2007 elections were held to elect ries, some Abkhazians moved to the North a 15-member parliament and a president Caucasus, and their descendants became of the Abazin national district. The popu­ known as Abazinians. There is also a large lation of the Abazin national district is es­ diaspora in Turkey, mostly descendants of timated at 15,000. Its capital is the village those expelled by the Russian empire in the of Psyzh. late 19th century. Hasan Ali Karasar At the end of the 8th century, following a dilution of Byzantine power, an Abkhaz­ ian kingdom emerged, which encompassed Further Reading the whole of western Georgia with its capi­ Danilova, E. N. Abaziny: Istoriko-etnogra­ ficheskoe /ssledovanie Khozyastva i Ob­ tal in Kutaisi. The kingdom consolidated shinnoy Organizatsii XIX vek (Abazins: Abkhazian tribes and thrived for two cen­ Historical-Ethnographic Study of Agricul­ turies before being superseded in 978 by a ture and Communitarian Organization in new state, known as the Kingdom of Ab­ the 19th Century). Moskva: lzdatel'stvo khazians and Kartvelians. Ruled by the Moskovskogo Universiteta, 1984. Bagrationi family, the capital remained Pershits, A. I. Abaziny: /storiko-Etnografiches­ in Kutaisi until 1122, when the expulsion kii Ocherk (Abazins: Historical-Ethno­ graphic Essays). Cherkessk: Karachaevo­ of the Arab emirate of Tbilist facilitated a Cherkesskoe Otdelenie Stavropol'ckogo move to that city. The kingdom succumbed Knizhnogo lzdatel'stva, 1989. to Mongol invasions in the 13th century, never to reappear, and was replaced by numerous smaller principalities, includ­ ing Abkhazia, now ruled by the Chachba Abkhaz (Sharvashidze) family. The Abkhaz were in regular battle with the neighboring prin­ The Abkhaz (or Abkhazians) are indige­ cipality of Mingrelia, an ethnic Georgian nous to the Caucasus region and the au­ region ruled by the Dadiani family. tochthonous people of Abkhazia, a Black Extensive interaction with the Geno­ Sea republic whose self-declared indepen­ ese in the 14th and 15th centuries was dence is recognized by Russia and Nica­ eclipsed by the rise of Ottoman power ragua but disputed by the remainder of in the region. The Turks brought Islam, the international community, which ac­ which gradually replaced Christianity cepts Georgia's right to the territory. Less as the dominant religion in Abkhazia, than 100,000 now live in Abkhazia, and though traditional paganism remained in­ the number of native Abkhaz speakers has fluential. The Ottomans were dislodged dwindled dming the last century through in turn by an expanding Russian empire Russification. While Christianity, Islam, and in 1810 Abkhazia became an unruly .
Recommended publications
  • The Security of the Caspian Sea Region
    16. The Georgian–Abkhazian conflict Alexander Krylov I. Introduction The Abkhaz have long populated the western Caucasus. They currently number about 100 000 people, speak one of the languages of the Abkhazo-Adygeyan (west Caucasian) language group, and live in the coastal areas on the southern slopes of the Caucasian ridge and along the Black Sea coast. Together with closely related peoples of the western Caucasus (for example, the Abazins, Adygeyans and Kabardians (or Circassians)) they play an important role in the Caucasian ethno-cultural community and consider themselves an integral part of its future. At the same time, the people living in coastal areas on the southern slopes of the Caucasian ridge have achieved broader communication with Asia Minor and the Mediterranean civilizations than any other people of the Caucasus. The geographical position of Abkhazia on the Black Sea coast has made its people a major factor in the historical process of the western Caucasus, acting as an economic and cultural bridge with the outside world. Georgians and Abkhaz have been neighbours from time immemorial. The Georgians currently number about 4 million people. The process of national consolidation of the Georgian nation is still far from complete: it includes some 20 subgroups, and the Megrelians (sometimes called Mingrelians) and Svans who live in western Georgia are so different in language and culture from other Georgians that it would be more correct to consider them as separate peoples. Some scholars, Hewitt, for example,1 suggest calling the Georgian nation not ‘Georgians’ but by their own name, Kartvelians, which includes the Georgians, Megrelians and Svans.2 To call all the different Kartvelian groups ‘Georgians’ obscures the true ethnic situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of Male Hungarian Conquerors: European and Asian Paternal Lineages of the Conquering Hungarian Tribes
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (2020) 12: 31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00996-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Genetic analysis of male Hungarian Conquerors: European and Asian paternal lineages of the conquering Hungarian tribes Erzsébet Fóthi1 & Angéla Gonzalez2 & Tibor Fehér3 & Ariana Gugora4 & Ábel Fóthi5 & Orsolya Biró6 & Christine Keyser2,7 Received: 11 March 2019 /Accepted: 16 October 2019 /Published online: 14 January 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract According to historical sources, ancient Hungarians were made up of seven allied tribes and the fragmented tribes that split off from the Khazars, and they arrived from the Eastern European steppes to conquer the Carpathian Basin at the end of the ninth century AD. Differentiating between the tribes is not possible based on archaeology or history, because the Hungarian Conqueror artifacts show uniformity in attire, weaponry, and warcraft. We used Y-STR and SNP analyses on male Hungarian Conqueror remains to determine the genetic source, composition of tribes, and kin of ancient Hungarians. The 19 male individuals paternally belong to 16 independent haplotypes and 7 haplogroups (C2, G2a, I2, J1, N3a, R1a, and R1b). The presence of the N3a haplogroup is interesting because it rarely appears among modern Hungarians (unlike in other Finno-Ugric-speaking peoples) but was found in 37.5% of the Hungarian Conquerors. This suggests that a part of the ancient Hungarians was of Ugric descent and that a significant portion spoke Hungarian. We compared our results with public databases and discovered that the Hungarian Conquerors originated from three distant territories of the Eurasian steppes, where different ethnicities joined them: Lake Baikal- Altai Mountains (Huns/Turkic peoples), Western Siberia-Southern Urals (Finno-Ugric peoples), and the Black Sea-Northern Caucasus (Caucasian and Eastern European peoples).
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Possibilities of the Use of Non-Invasive Serological Biomarkers Severe in Population Studies
    Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 12(9): September 2019 ISSN 0974-3618 (Print) www.rjptonline.org 0974-360X (Online) RESEARCH ARTICLE Modern Possibilities of the Use of Non-Invasive Serological Biomarkers Severe in Population Studies Sergey Kotelevets1*, Sergey Chekh2, Zukhra Karakotova3 1North Caucasus State Academy, Medical Institute, PhD in Medical Sciences, Professor, Cherkessk, Russian Federation. 2North Caucasus State Academy of Humanities and Technology, Head of Department of Software Development, Cherkessk, Russian Federation. 3North Caucasus State Academy of Humanities and Technology, Medical Institute, PhD Student, Cherkessk, Russian Federation. *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The ethnic and the gender factors materially affect the prevalence of gastric atrophy. All the patients were divided into five ethnic groups: Russians, Karachays, Abazins, Circassians, Nogais. The decrease in serum gastrin-17 less than 10 pmol/l is a sensitive and specific biomarker for antral mucosal atrophy, pepsinogen-I less than 25 µg/l is a corpus mucosal atrophy biomarker (Se − 89% and 92%, Sp − 97% and 96%). Gastrin-17 and pepsinogen-I are also sensitive and specific biomarkers for mild, moderate, severe atrophy of the antrum and corpus (for severe antral mucosal atrophy Se − 96%, Sp − 92%, for severe corpus mucosal atrophy Se − 88%, Sp − 97%). A total of 75 patients with multifocal atrophic gastritis were examined histologically. 67 patients had gastrin-17 <10 pmol/l and pepsinogen-I <25 µg/l at the same time. 7 patients had gastrin-17 from 10 to 11.5 pmol/l, 1 patient had gastrin-17 = 19 pmol/l (Se − 89%). Therefore, the level of gastrin-17 and pepsinogen-I simultaneously decreases among patients with multifocal atrophic gastritis.
    [Show full text]
  • Review TRIER Edited
    TOM TRIER, HEDGIV LOHM, DAVID SZAKONYI: Under Siege. Inter-Ethnic Relations in Abkhazia. xi + 159 pp., maps. London: Hurst & Company. 2010. £25. The more information provided to Western audiences about Abkhazia and its dispute with Georgia, the better, so that attitudes and policies can be predicated on facts rather than ignorance, as has regularly been the case. But not all works are necessarily (wholly) accurate in what they present to their readers. The present volume is a mixture of wheat and chaff, and the latter could easily have been winnowed out prior to publication. Abkhazia achieved de facto independence from Georgia at the end of September 1993 after a 14-month war. Though official recognition was granted by Russia on 26 August 2008, and since then by three other states, most of the international community is not (yet) prepared to acknowledge Abkhazia’s de iure status. This needed to be stated once in the Introduction; but inserting the words ‘de facto’ each time the country or one of its governmental posts is mentioned soon irritates the reader. The authors’ fieldwork was conducted in 2007, and, unfortunately, some of their statements are out of date. Though I would advise those unfamiliar with the region to look elsewhere for background to the current situation, what the authors have to say about their central concern of inter-ethnic relations is perceptive and pertinent. Recognising the achievements made by Abkhazia, despite years of international sanctions and blockade, the authors address a wide range of issues that the authorities will eventually have to tackle. And, given the multi-ethnic makeup of Abkhazia’s population, the problems facing the Abkhazians do not solely concern relations with those remaining from the pre-war Kartvelian population, who are mostly Mingrelians largely confined to the southernmost province of Gal and whom, in line with norms in Georgia, the authors style Georgians.
    [Show full text]
  • Short History of Abkhazia and Abkhazian-Georgian Relations
    HISTORY AND CONTROVERSY: SHORT HISTORY OF ABKHAZIA AND ABKHAZIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS Svetlana Chervonnaya (Chapter 2 from the book” Conflict in the Caucasus: Georgia, Abkhazia and the Russian Shadow”, Glastonbury, 1994) Maps: Andrew Andersen, 2004-2007 Below I shall try to give a short review of the history of Abkhazia and Abkhazian-Georgian relations. No claims are made as to an in-depth study of the remote past nor as to any new discoveries. However, I feel it necessary to express my own point of view about the cardinal issues of Abkhazian history over which fierce political controversies have been raging and, as far as possible, to dispel the mythology that surrounds it. So much contradictory nonsense has been touted as truth: the twenty five centuries of Abkhazian statehood; the dual aboriginality of the Abkhazians; Abkhazia is Russia; Abkhazians are Georgians; Abkhazians came to Western Georgia in the 19th century; Abkhazians as bearers of Islamic fundamentalism; the wise Leninist national policy according to which Abkhazia should have been a union republic, and Stalin's pro-Georgian intrigues which turned the treaty-related Abkhazian republic into an autonomous one. Early Times to 1917. The Abkhazian people (self-designation Apsua) constitute one of the most ancient autochthonous inhabitants of the eastern Black Sea littoral. According to the last All-Union census, within the Abkhazian ASSR, whose total population reached 537,000, the Abkhazians (93,267 in 1989) numbered just above 17% - an obvious ethnic minority. With some difference in dialects (Abzhu - which forms the basis of the literary language, and Bzyb), and also in sub- ethnic groups (Abzhu; Gudauta, or Bzyb; Samurzaqano), ethnically, in social, cultural and psychological respects the Abkhazian people represent a historically formed stable community - a nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Soft Underbelly
    RUSSIA’S SOFT UNDERBELLY: THE STABILITY OF INSTABILITY IN DAGESTAN Edward W. Walker Winter 2000 Edward W. Walker is Executive Director of the Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post- Soviet Studies at UC Berkeley Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank Diahanna Lynch and Laura Henry for their research assistance; Sergei Arutiunov, Victoria E. Bonnell, George W. Breslauer, M. Steven Fish, Johanna Nichols, Ronald G. Suny, and Robert Ware for their helpful suggestions on earlier drafts; and Denise Monczewski and Alexandra Patten for their copy editing and production work. Support for the publication of this working paper comes from the National Security Education Program. A color version of this map can be found on the Internet at http://www.caspian.net/peoples.gif. 1 Introduction In the first week of August 1999, some 1,000-2,000 armed militants entered into the Republic of Dagestan from the breakaway region of Chechnya (Ichkeria) in an effort to “liberate” Dagestan from Russian occupation. Apparently comprised of a mix of Chechens, Dagestanis, and Islamic militants from Central Asia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Arab world, and possibly elsewhere, the Chechen-based insurgents were nominally directed by an organization called the United Headquarters of Daghestan Mujahadin and commanded by the Chechen guerilla “field commander,” Shamil Basaev, and his ally, a mysterious Jordanian or Saudi citizen of unknown ethnic background who goes by the name “Khattab.”1 The previous year, Basaev had been a central figure in the formation of the Congress of Peoples of Chechnya and Dagestan (CPCD), the main platform of which was the unification of Chechnya and Dagestan into a single independent Islamic state.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples of Russia and Political History
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF RUSSIA AND POLITICAL HISTORY Galina Diatchkova Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Abstract I Resume The author presents a brief history ofthe Indigenous people ofthe Russian Federation, noting the different types of government policies over past centuries. She then outlines changes underthe more democratic emphasis of the current Russian Federation. New initiatives indicate the possible restoration oflanguages and education systems. There is also the potential for new, culturally appropriate, adminstrative systems. L'auteure presents un resume de I'histoire des peuples autochtones de la Federation russe en mettant en evidence les politiques gouvemementales adoptees au cours des siecles. Elle presente ensuite un aperyu des changements suscites par Ie democratisation de la Federation russe ac­ tuelle. De nouvelles initiatives indiquent la restauration possible d'un systeme d'education axe sur les autochtones et de I'utilisation des langues autochtones. Elles indiquent aussi I'etablissement potentiel de nouveaux systemes administratifs adaptes aux differences culturelles. The Canadian Journal ofNative Stucles XXI, 2(2001 ):217-233. 218 Galina Diatchkova According to a list included with Government Decree 255 dated March 24, 2000 "On the Unified Enumeration of Small In~igenous Nations of the Russian Federation", 40 nations are classified as small Indigenous nations of the North, Siberia and the Far East of Russia. 1 Their population is estimated at approximately 180,000 people residing in 28 regions of the Russian Federation. The regions of the Far North and similar areas make up about 64% ofthe territory ofthe country. The total population ofthe North accounts for approximately 8% of the entire population of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Johannes Rohr Report 18 IWGIA – 2014 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Copyright: IWGIA Author: Johannes Rohr Editor: Diana Vinding and Kathrin Wessendorf Proofreading: Elaine Bolton Cover design and layout: Jorge Monrás Cover photo: Sakhalin: Indigenous ceremony opposite to oil facilities. Photographer: Wolfgang Blümel Prepress and print: Electronic copy only Hurridocs Cip data Title: IWGIA Report 18: Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation Author: Johannes Rohr Editor: Diana Vinding and Kathrin Wessendorf Number of pages: 69 ISBN: 978-87-92786-49-4 Language: English Index: 1. Indigenous peoples – 2. Human rights Geographical area: Russian Federation Date of publication: 2014 INTERNATIONAL WORK GROUP FOR INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS Classensgade 11 E, DK 2100 - Copenhagen, Denmark Tel: (45) 35 27 05 00 - Fax: (45) 35 27 05 07 E-mail: [email protected] - Web: www.iwgia.org This report has been prepared and published with the financial support of the Foreign Ministry of Denmark through its Neighbourhood programme. CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1 The indigenous peoples of the north ................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Matters of definition .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Movement Toward a Monolingual Nation in Russia: the Language Policy in the Circassian Republics of the Northern Caucasus
    Journal of Caucasian Studies (JOCAS) / Kafkasya Çalışmaları - Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi September / Eylül 2015, Yıl / Vol. 1, № 1 ISSN 2149–9527 (print / basılı) ISSN 2149–9101 (online / çevrimiçi) The Movement Toward a Monolingual Nation in Russia: The Language Policy in the Circassian Republics of the Northern Caucasus Sufian Zhemukhov * Şener Aktürk ** Abstract In the context of an institutionalized multi-nationalist ideology, the language policy in Russia is based on the distinction of the native language of the Russian people and the languages of all other non- Russians. Such a distinction is reflected in ‘the Constitution of the Russian Federation,’ federal and regional laws and policy practices that have given advantage to Russian over the other titular languages of the indigenous people in the Russian Federation. This article charts the grand ‘shift’ in Russian state policy toward ethnic diversity. The Soviet- era multinational Leninist/Stalinist approach summarized in the slogan "druzhba narodov" (friendship of peoples) shifted toward a more assimilationist nation-building model. Such ideology reduces the ethnic diversity into just a cultural, folkloric feature of an otherwise monolingual, mono-cultural nation-state. What is the purpose of this discriminatory ethnic and language policy? Our case study of Circassians, one of the ethnic groups in the North Caucasus, demonstrates that, after many decades, such a policy has only caused political and cultural damages to all sides and alienation between them. On the one hand, the assimilationist language policy continues to cause problems with the non-Russian ethnic groups adding to the major challenges that the Russian state faces today. On the other hand, non-Russian ethnic groups, though not yet assimilated into the Russian culture, have undergone significant decrease in terms of their rights to develop their languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability in Russia's Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus: Recent Developments
    Stability in Russia’s Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus: Recent Developments Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs December 13, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34613 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Stability in Russia’s Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus Summary Terrorist attacks in Russia’s North Caucasus—a border area between the Black and Caspian Seas that includes the formerly breakaway Chechnya and other ethnic-based regions—appeared to increase substantially in 2007-2009. Moreover, civilian and government casualties reached levels not seen in several years and terrorist attacks again took place outside the North Caucasus. Although the number of terrorist incidents may have leveled off or even declined slightly in 2010 from the high levels of 2009, the rate of civilian and government casualties continued to increase throughout the North Caucasus in 2010 and a rising number of terrorist incidents took place outside of Chechnya. Illustrative of the new range and scope of violence, the Moscow subway system was bombed in March 2010, resulting in over 40 deaths and dozens of injuries. Before the recent rise in terrorism, it seemed that government security forces had been successful in tamping down their range and scope by aggressively carrying out over a thousand sweep operations (“zachistki”) in the North Caucasus. During these operations, security forces surround a village and search the homes of the residents, ostensibly in a bid to apprehend terrorists. Critics of the operations allege that the searches are illegal and that troops frequently engage in pillaging and gratuitous violence and are responsible for kidnapping for ransom and “disappearances” of civilians.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Hereditary Diseases in the Karachay-Cherkess Republic
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Epidemiology of Hereditary Diseases in the Karachay-Cherkess Republic Rena A. Zinchenko 1,2, Amin Kh. Makaov 3, Andrey V. Marakhonov 1,* , Varvara A. Galkina 1, Vitaly V. Kadyshev 1 , Galina I. El’chinova 1, Elena L. Dadali 1, Lyudmila K. Mikhailova 4, Nika V. Petrova 1, Nina E. Petrina 1, Tatyana A. Vasilyeva 1, Polina Gundorova 1, Alexander V. Polyakov 1, Oksana Y. Alexandrova 5, Sergey I. Kutsev 1 and Eugeny K. Ginter 1 1 Research Centre for Medical Genetics, 115522 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (R.A.Z.); [email protected] (V.A.G.); [email protected] (V.V.K.); [email protected] (G.I.E.); [email protected] (E.L.D.); [email protected] (N.V.P.); [email protected] (N.E.P.); [email protected] (T.A.V.); [email protected] (P.G.); [email protected] (A.V.P.); [email protected] (S.I.K.); [email protected] (E.K.G.) 2 N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, 105064 Moscow, Russia 3 Municipal Budgetary Health Care Setting “Khabez Central District Hospital”, 369400 Khabez, Russia; [email protected] 4 N.N. Priorov Central Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, 117997 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 5 Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (“MONIKI”), 129110 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-499-324-1224 Received: 26 November 2019; Accepted: 27 December 2019; Published: 3 January 2020 Abstract: Prevalence and allelic heterogeneity of hereditary diseases (HDs) could vary significantly in different human populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Turkey, Russia, and Persia
    http://www.gloria-center.org/2012/04/between-turkey-russia-and-persia-perceptions-of-national-identity-in-azerbaijan-and-armenia-at-the-turn-of-the-nineteenth-and-twentieth-centuries/ BETWEEN TURKEY, RUSSIA, AND PERSIA: PERCEPTIONS OF NATIONAL IDENTITY IN AZERBAIJAN AND ARMENIA AT THE TURN OF THE NINETEENTH AND TWENTIETH CENTURIES April 27, 2012 gloria-center.org This article traces the emergence of the modern national identities of Azerbaijanis and Armenians back to the last quarter of the nineteenth century. In doing so, it emphasizes the ways national identities were shaped by Azerbaijani and Armenian intellectual elites, reflecting their historical heritage of being parts of Turkish, Persian, and Russian empires. Accordingly, the evolution of mutual perceptions of Azerbaijanis and Armenians vis-à-vis their imperial neighbors–and vice versa–is highlighted. The article focuses on the period of the second half of the nineteenth century until 1920/1921, when following a two-year intermezzo of independent states in the South Caucasus, both Armenia and Azerbaijan were effectively incorporated into the emerging Soviet Union. The ethnic conflicts that have dominated the political landscape of the South Caucasus–a historical crossroads of many civilizations, empires, cultures, and peoples–since the years following the Soviet Union’s collapse have generated strong ethno-nationalisms. They have played a crucial role in determining inter-ethnic, and to a certain degree also inter-state, relations in this post-Soviet area. Given the strategic location of the South Caucasus–with its small populace historically sandwiched between great powers–local ethno-nationalisms have been considerably affected by the perceptions of neighboring states.
    [Show full text]