"The Miller" UPTON-7943 (B.Abt 1740 D.Aft 1810) Sp: Delilah -7944 (B.Abt 1743 M.Abt 1772 D.1810) 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Descendants of John UPTON-15067 15 Feb 2017 Page 1 1. John UPTON-15067 (b.1710 d.1783) sp: Elizabeth ROBERTS-15068 (b.1720 d.1794) 2. Elizabeth "Betsy" UPTON-15271 sp: Samuel WILKINS-1505 2. Sarah UPTON-15272 2. Tobias UPTON-15274 sp: Sarah -17621 (b.1770 m.1837 d.1866) 3. James UPTON-17622 (b.1810) sp: Charity -17623 (b.1818 m.1837) 4. Delillah UPTON-17629 (b.1838) sp: Thomas M. ASBELL-17630 (m.1855) 4. Robert Lee UPTON-17631 (b.1839 d.1909) sp: Nancy GILBERT-17632 (b.1840 m.1869 d.1910) 5. Charles Alvin UPTON-17663 (b.1870 d.1898) sp: Emma J. DOWDY -17664 (b.1873 m.1891 d.1924) 6. Wesley UPTON-17675 (b.1893 d.1893) 6. Ida Keturah UPTON-17676 (b.1894 d.1966) sp: William C. WORTHY-17677 (m.1914) 6. Grady UPTON-17678 (b.1895 d.1895) 6. Carey Jefferson UPTON-17679 (b.1897 d.1992) sp: Thelma HUFSTECLER-17680 5. Laura UPTON-17665 (b.1872 d.1902) sp: Robert LOWE-17666 5. Sarah V. UPTON-17667 (b.1874 d.1941) sp: William Boyd SIZEMORE-17668 (m.1896) 5. James Alvin UPTON-17669 (b.1876 d.1942) sp: Ella T. PIRKLE-17670 (b.1879 m.1899 d.1970) 6. Wallace Hurbert UPTON-17681 (b.1901 d.1980) sp: Ruth A. PARTRIDGE-17682 (b.1904 m.1927 d.1982) 6. Fannie Mae UPTON-17683 (b.1903 d.1972) sp: Joseph M. MCCLAIN-17685 6. Clara Bell UPTON-17688 (b.1905) sp: James ORR-17689 sp: Noah HAYNES-17690 6. Carrie Lena UPTON-17686 (b.1906) sp: Joseph David HICKS-17687 (m.1928) 6. Jessie Lueva UPTON-17691 (b.1908) 6. Blanche Drucilla UPTON-17692 (b.1911 d.1985) sp: Clarence THACKERY-17693 (m.1931) 6. Woodrow Wilson UPTON-17694 (b.1913 d.1979) sp: Cora Bell EDMONDSON-17695 6. Hillard Filmore UPTON-17696 (b.1916 d.1981) 6. Wilford Pirkie UPTON-17697 (b.1919) sp: Willie Ruth BATTELS-17698 Descendants of John UPTON-15067 15 Feb 2017 Page 2 6. Carl Haynes UPTON-17699 (b.1922) 6. Paul Lester UPTON-17700 (b.1925 d.1981) sp: Annie Ruth SCATTERFIELD-17701 5. Robert Lee Jr. UPTON-17671 (b.1878 d.1930) sp: Sarah Jane MCCARLESS-17672 (b.1880 m.1897 d.1964) 6. Winnie Charlotte UPTON-17702 (b.1899 d.1911) 6. Charlie Buchanon (Twin) UPTON-17703 (b.1903) sp: Bertie Lois SMITH-17704 (m.1925) 6. Horace Greeley (Twin) UPTON-17705 (b.1903) sp: Bessie Irene COLVIN-17706 (m.1936) 7. Nina Larue UPTON-17707 (b.1922 d.1924) 6. Virgie Beatrice UPTON-17708 (b.1905 d.1964) sp: Charles Alday DAVID-17709 6. Ellen Hester UPTON-17710 (b.1908) sp: Herman Dewey BROWN-17711 (b.1908) 5. Hester Mongolia UPTON-17673 (b.1881 d.1963) sp: Robert Jared HAMRIC-17674 (b.1876 m.1900 d.1946) 4. Sarah UPTON-17633 (b.1841) sp: M. R. PRUITT-17634 (m.1865) 4. Nancy UPTON-17635 (b.1843) 4. William UPTON-17636 (b.1844) 4. Samuel W. UPTON-17637 (b.1845 d.1915) sp: Melvina, Mrs. QUINN-17638 sp: Cordelia Christina SAMPLES-17639 (m.1886) 5. Emma Pearl UPTON-17712 (b.1890 d.1930) sp: James Luther CUSHING-17713 (m.1903) 6. Arthur Houston CUSHING-17714 (b.1904 d.1961) 6. Jesse Leonard CUSHING-17715 (b.1908 d.1973) 6. Daisy Elizabeth CUSHING-17716 (b.1909 d.2000) 6. Oscar CUSHING-17717 (b.1911 d.1915) 6. Emma Lee CUSHING-17718 (b.1913 d.2002) 6. Hilda CUSHING-17719 (b.1916) 6. Gertrude Beatrice CUSHING-17720 (b.1920 d.1990) 4. Lavinia UPTON-17640 (b.1847) 4. David UPTON-17641 (b.1845 d.1931) sp: Harriet PRUITT-17642 (b.1848 m.1867 d.1930) 5. Julia UPTON-17726 (b.1869) 5. Margaret A. UPTON-17727 (b.1873) 5. Chelsea UPTON-17728 (b.1874) 5. Lula UPTON-17729 (b.1879) sp: UNKNOWN-17721 5. Walter UPTON-17722 (b.1867 d.1944) sp: Margaret Jane GARNER-17723 (b.1872 m.1887 d.1915) 6. David UPTON-17725 (b.1893) Descendants of John UPTON-15067 15 Feb 2017 Page 3 sp: Savannah -17724 (b.1897) 4. Francis M. UPTON-17643 (b.1849) sp: Mary F. GILBERT-17644 (b.1856 m.1871 d.1890) 5. Jessey W. UPTON-17730 (b.1874) 5. David M. UPTON-17731 (b.1875 d.1939) sp: Ora L. CHAMBLEE-17732 (b.1877 m.1896 d.1955) 5. Elijah UPTON-17733 (b.1879 d.1957) sp: Ella J. MASTERS-17734 (b.1879 m.1896) 6. Eugene Leslie UPTON-17735 (b.1897 d.1979) 6. Ida B. UPTON-17736 (b.1899) 5. Robert UPTON-17737 (b.1879) 5. Lenzy B UPTON-17738 (b.1880) sp: Lizzie U. SPENCE-17739 (m.1900) 6. Eva UPTON-17740 (b.1901 d.1904) 5. Levi A. UPTON-17741 (b.1886) sp: Alice WHITMORE-17742 (m.1905) 5. Cora E. UPTON-17743 (b.1888) 5. Charles H. UPTON-17744 (b.1889 d.1979) sp: Alma C. -17745 (b.1891 d.1941) 6. Laverda UPTON-17748 (b.1910) 6. Pearl UPTON-17749 (b.1912) 6. Fred E. UPTON-17746 (b.1913 d.1913) 6. Artie UPTON-17750 (b.1916) 6. Lofton UPTON-17751 (b.1919) 6. Thelma R. UPTON-17747 (b.1928 d.1928) 5. Mary E. UPTON-17752 (b.1890) sp: Lee PATIE-17645 (m.1894) 5. Alpha Omega UPTON-17753 (b.1898) 4. James UPTON-17646 (b.1855) sp: Eliza GAYLOR-17647 (m.1878) 5. Linday UPTON-17648 (b.1880) 4. Peter Tobias UPTON-17649 (b.1856) sp: Amelia Augusta PARR-17650 (m.1874) 5. Sarah UPTON-17754 (b.1879) 5. Mary UPTON-17755 (b.1881) 5. Dixie D. UPTON-17756 (b.1883) sp: Robert LOWE-17757 (m.1903) 5. Raymond M. UPTON-17758 (b.1887 d.1979) sp: Emma V. -17759 (b.1887 d.1959) 5. Minnie UPTON-17760 (b.1889) sp: J. T. KEENER-17761 (m.1907) 5. Burton UPTON-17762 (b.1891) 4. Georgiana UPTON-17651 (b.1858) sp: J. H. CUNNINGHAM-17652 (m.1878) Descendants of John UPTON-15067 15 Feb 2017 Page 4 4. Martha UPTON-17653 (b.1864) 4. Alice UPTON-17654 (b.1866) sp: Mary J. DEAN-17624 (b.1842 m.1869) 4. Elizabeth UPTON-17655 (b.1870) 4. Louella UPTON-17656 (b.1871) sp: HOWELL-17657 4. James P. UPTON-17658 (b.1874) 4. John T. UPTON-17659 (b.1876 d.1960) sp: Emilie -17660 (b.1881 m.1897 d.1971) 5. John W. UPTON-17661 (b.1897) 4. Francis Major UPTON-17662 (b.1878) 3. UPTON-17625 (b.1815) 3. David UPTON-17626 (b.1822) sp: UNKNOWN-17627 (m.1840) 4. Tobias UPTON-17628 (b.1842) 2. John "The Miller" UPTON-7943 (b.Abt 1740 d.Aft 1810) sp: Delilah -7944 (b.Abt 1743 m.Abt 1772 d.1810) 3. John Henry "The Pioneer" UPTON-7945 (b.Abt 1770 d.1847) sp: Eleanor BAXLEY-7949 (m.Abt 1798 d.Abt 1813) 4. William UPTON-7950 (b.1799 d.1869) sp: Elizabeth Porter CAIN-8003 (b.1807 m.1828 d.1889) 5. Eliza Ann UPTON-8004 (b.1829 d.1916) sp: William W. PLUMLEY-8014 (b.1827 m.1847 d.Bef 1870) 6. James B. PLUMLEY-8015 (b.1848) sp: UNKNOWN 6. Elizabeth J. PLUMLEY-8016 (b.1849 d.Bef 1916) sp: Moses RANKIN-11166 (m.1866) 7. Jesse RANKIN-11167 (b.Abt 1867) sp: Etta CARTER-11169 (b.Abt 1876 m.1895) 7. Allie M. RANKIN-11168 (b.Abt 1872) sp: Edward JAMERSON-11170 (b.Abt 1871 m.1893) sp: David, Jr. VENTERS-11179 (m.1862) 6. Elydia PLUMLEY-8023 (b.1850 d.1956) sp: Walter S. WARTHEN-8026 (b.1846 m.1870) 7. Henry E. WARTHEN-8027 (b.1878 d.Abt 1910) 7. Elzada WARTHEN-8028 (b.1880) 7. Daisy E. WARTHEN-8029 (b.1882) sp: James VAUGHT-11216 (b.Abt 1861 m.1904) 7. Clora M. WARTHEN-9517 (b.1883) sp: Harry V. REEDER-9513 (b.Abt 1883 m.1908) 8. Hildred REEDER-11225 (b.Abt 1910) sp: Kenneth SPAIN-11223 9. William SPAIN-11224 (b.1930) 8. Earthel A. REEDER-11222 (b.1925) Descendants of John UPTON-15067 15 Feb 2017 Page 5 7. Walter S. WARTHEN-8030 (b.1884) 7. Lora Mabel WARTHEN-8032 (b.Abt 1888) sp: A. Cando B. ROSE-11219 (b.Abt 1886 m.1908) 7. George W. WARTHEN-8033 (b.1890) 7. Allie Fay WARTHEN-8034 (b.1892) 7. Grace WARTHEN-8035 (b.1895) 7. Louisa J. WARTHEN-8036 (b.Abt 1874) sp: Philip L. NULL-11226 (b.Abt 1871 m.1894) 7. Martha J. WARTHEN-8037 (b.Abt 1867) 7. Kesiah WARTHEN-8038 (b.Abt 1869) 7. Harvey I. WARTHEN-8039 (b.Abt 1875) 7. Florida M. WARTHEN-8040 (b.Abt 1877) 6. Lourana A. PLUMLEY-8018 (b.1852 d.Bef 1916) sp: John DANIELS-11173 7. Ellen Melessa DANIELS-11174 (b.Abt 1864) sp: John W. HUTCHCRAFT-11175 (b.Abt 1860 m.1882) 6. John D. PLUMLEY-8019 (b.1853 d.1875) sp: Jane BRUMLEY-11178 (m.1873) 6. Rachel Catherine PLUMLEY-8020 (b.1854 d.Bef 1916) sp: Andrew RUSH-11180 (b.Abt 1853 m.1874) 7. Nancy Ann RUSH-11181 (b.Abt 1874) sp: Joseph L. STONE-11182 (b.Abt 1870 m.1897) 6. Nancy Emiline PLUMLEY-8021 (b.1857 d.1950) sp: Walter FOBAR-8025 (m.1928) sp: George Thomas ROCKETT-9920 (b.1856 m.1878 d.1909) 7. Lemuel J. ROCKETT-9928 (b.Abt 1879) 7. Charles W. ROCKETT-9927 (b.1881 d.1957) sp: Rutha Edna FOLEY-11203 (b.1887 m.1905 d.1959) 8. Daulton O. ROCKETT-12878 (b.1912) 8.
Recommended publications
  • AUDIENCE of the FEAST of the FULL MOON 22 February 2016 – 13 Adar 1 5776 23 February 2016 – 14 Adar 1 5776 24 February 2016 – 15 Adar 1 5776
    AUDIENCE OF THE FEAST OF THE FULL MOON 22 February 2016 – 13 Adar 1 5776 23 February 2016 – 14 Adar 1 5776 24 February 2016 – 15 Adar 1 5776 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ As a point of understanding never mentioned before in any Akurian Lessons or Scripts and for those who read these presents: When The Most High, Himself, and anyone else in The Great Presence speaks, there is massive vision for all, without exception, in addition to the voices that there cannot be any misunderstanding of any kind by anybody for any reason. It is never a situation where a select sees one vision and another sees anything else even in the slightest detail. That would be a deliberate deception, and The Most High will not tolerate anything false that is not identified as such in His Presence. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Encamped and Headquartered in full array at Philun, 216th Realm, 4,881st Abstract, we received Call to present ourselves before The Most High, ALIHA ASUR HIGH, in accordance with standing alert. In presence with fellow Horsemen Immanuel, Horus and Hammerlin and our respective Seconds, I requested all available Seniors or their respective Seconds to attend in escort. We presented ourselves in proper station and I announced our Company to The Most High in Grand Salute as is the procedure. NOTE: Bold-italics indicate emphasis: In the Script of The Most High, by His direction; in any other, emphasis is mine. The Most High spoke: ""Lord King of Israel El Aku ALIHA ASUR HIGH, Son of David, Son of Fire, you that is Named of My Own Name, know that I am pleased with your Company even unto the farthest of them on station in the Great Distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri State Archives Finding Aid 5.20
    Missouri State Archives Finding Aid 5.20 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE COMMISSIONS PARDONS, 1836- Abstract: Pardons (1836-2018), restorations of citizenship, and commutations for Missouri convicts. Extent: 66 cubic ft. (165 legal-size Hollinger boxes) Physical Description: Paper Location: MSA Stacks ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Alternative Formats: Microfilm (S95-S123) of the Pardon Papers, 1837-1909, was made before additions, interfiles, and merging of the series. Most of the unmicrofilmed material will be found from 1854-1876 (pardon certificates and presidential pardons from an unprocessed box) and 1892-1909 (formerly restorations of citizenship). Also, stray records found in the Senior Reference Archivist’s office from 1836-1920 in Box 164 and interfiles (bulk 1860) from 2 Hollinger boxes found in the stacks, a portion of which are in Box 164. Access Restrictions: Applications or petitions listing the social security numbers of living people are confidential and must be provided to patrons in an alternative format. At the discretion of the Senior Reference Archivist, some records from the Board of Probation and Parole may be restricted per RSMo 549.500. Publication Restrictions: Copyright is in the public domain. Preferred Citation: [Name], [Date]; Pardons, 1836- ; Commissions; Office of Secretary of State, Record Group 5; Missouri State Archives, Jefferson City. Acquisition Information: Agency transfer. PARDONS Processing Information: Processing done by various staff members and completed by Mary Kay Coker on October 30, 2007. Combined the series Pardon Papers and Restorations of Citizenship because the latter, especially in later years, contained a large proportion of pardons. The two series were split at 1910 but a later addition overlapped from 1892 to 1909 and these records were left in their respective boxes but listed chronologically in the finding aid.
    [Show full text]
  • And Type the TITLE of YOUR WORK in All Caps
    IN TWITTER AND WIKIPEDIA WE TRUST?: ONLINE INFORMATION AND THE CRISIS OF CREDIBILITY by KRISTEN M. HEFLIN (Under the Direction of James F. Hamilton) ABSTRACT Journalism is currently experiencing a severe crisis of credibility, and the Internet is often celebrated as a response to this crisis. Drawing from a historical-cultural analysis, this dissertation begins by historicizing the crisis of credibility in journalism and the development of the Internet as a decentralized network to provide the context necessary to better understand the expectations, practices and issues related to online information and the crisis of credibility. It then discusses the Internet‘s inability to serve as the solution to this crisis as being rooted in the contradiction between deliberation and verification, two values at the heart of journalistic practice, liberal democratic media theory and ultimately Western epistemology. Through analyses of popular and trade press evaluations of Wikipedia and Twitter this dissertation discusses the irreconcilable nature of these values and the ways journalists try, unsuccessfully, to reconcile these two values. Despite its promise, the Internet is not the solution to this crisis of credibility because online sources (such as Wikipedia) and non-professional contributions (such as those on Twitter) have been largely accommodated within traditional journalistic routines, professional norms and reigning conceptions of producing authoritative knowledge. Thus, journalists‘ use of Wikipedia and Twitter perpetuate the contradictions at the heart of journalism practice and traditional Western epistemology, which are the same instabilities that produce the present crisis in credibility. As such, this dissertation reveals that the crisis of credibility is not a technological one, but a cultural one about the inadequacy of liberal democratic media theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Wake Forest Magazine December 2001
    2000-2001 Honor Roll of Donors Wake For e st M A G A Z I N E Volume 49, Number 2 December 2001 Wake For e st M A G A Z I N E and Honor Roll of Donors Features 16 After Disaster by Cherin C. Poovey An American tragedy bonds the University community in patriotism, compassion, unity, and hope. 23 Religion of Peace? by Charles A. Kimball Understanding Islam means grasping its complexities, which are rooted in rancor. 28 Opportunity Knocks by Liz Switzer The Richter Scholarships open doors for five students to study abroad— and open their eyes as well. Page 16 Essay 34 Great Expectations Page 28 by Leah P. McCoy Reflective students in the Class of 2001 say Wake Forest met most of theirs. Departments Campus Chronicle 2 52 Honor Roll of Donors 14 Sports 37 Class Notes Page 34 Volume 49, Number 2 December 2001 2 Campus Chronicle New school ‘a natural partnership’ Engineering a President Thomas K. Hearn Dean, senior vice president for Jr. said the new school will aid health affairs of Wake Forest. r esource in the transformation of “Currently, all of the top NIH- Winston-Salem’s economy. funded institutions have an AKE FOREST and “The school will strengthen engineering school or biomed- WVirginia Tech (Virginia Wake Forest’s intellectual ical engineering department. Polytechnic Institute and resources, thereby strengthening This new school will address State University) have the capabilities of the Piedmont the goals of both institutions.” announced plans to establish Triad Research Park.” If the planning proceeds as a joint School of Biomedical “This is a natural partner- hoped, the universities will Engineering and Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the 1012 June 16 T81.13
    T81.13 JOURNAL OF THE JUNE 16 LaFalce Olver Shaw Kleczka Miller (FL) Stokes House to abolish the Consent Calendar and LaHood Orton Shays Matsui Mineta Thornton to establish in its place a Corrections Cal- Largent Owens Shuster Meek Moakley Tucker endar (Rept. No. 104±144). Referred to the Lazio Paxon Slaughter Mica Pelosi Weldon (FL) House Calendar. Leach Payne (NJ) Smith (MI) Miller (CA) Rose Yates Mr. ARCHER: Committee on Ways and Levin Peterson (MN) Smith (NJ) Lewis (CA) Petri Smith (WA) So the amendment was agreed to. Means. H.R. 1812. A bill to amend the Inter- Lincoln Pombo Souder The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. nal Revenue Code of 1986 to revise the in- Lipinski Pomeroy Stark FOLEY, assumed the Chair. come estate, and gift tax rules applicable to LoBiondo Portman Stearns When Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, individuals who lose U.S. citizenship; with Lofgren Poshard Stenholm an amendment (Rept. No. 104±145). Referred Longley Pryce Stockman Chairman, reported that the Com- to the Committee of the Whole House on the Luther Quinn Studds mittee, having had under consideration State of the Union. Maloney Radanovich Stupak said bill, had come to no resolution Manzullo Rahall Talent T81.19 TIME LIMITATION OF REFERRED Markey Ramstad Tate thereon. Martinez Rangel Tauzin BILL T Martini Regula Thomas 81.13 ADJOURNMENT OVER Pursuant clause 5 of rule X the fol- McCarthy Reynolds Thompson McCollum Richardson Thornberry On motion of Mr. ARMEY, by unani- lowing action was taken by the Speak- McCrery Riggs Thurman mous consent, er: McDermott Rivers Tiahrt Ordered, That when the House ad- H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S
    Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress By Corey Michael Brooks A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair Professor David M. Henkin Professor Eric Schickler Fall 2010 Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress © 2010 By Corey Michael Brooks 1 Abstract Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress by Corey Michael Brooks Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair This dissertation reintegrates abolitionism into the main currents of U.S. political history. Because of a bifurcation between studies of the American antislavery movement and political histories of the sectional conflict, modern scholars have drastically underestimated the significance of abolitionist political activism. Historians often characterize political abolitionists as naïve idealists or separatist moral purists, but I recast them as practical, effective politicians, who capitalized on rare openings in American political institutions to achieve outsized influence in the face of a robust two-party system. Third-party abolitionists shaped national debate far beyond their numbers and played central roles in the emergence of the Republican Party. Over the second half of the 1830s, political abolitionists devised the Slave Power concept, claiming that slaveholder control of the federal government endangered American democracy; this would later become the Republicans‘ most important appeal. Integrating this argument with an institutional analysis of the Second Party System, antislavery activists assailed the Whigs and Democrats—cross-sectional parties that incorporated antislavery voices while supporting proslavery policies—as beholden to the Slave Power.
    [Show full text]
  • The Executive's Privilege
    PAGE PROOF DRAFT – PAGE NUMBERS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 9/18/2020 Duke Law Journal VOLUME 70 OCTOBER 2020 NUMBER 1 THE EXECUTIVE’S PRIVILEGE JONATHAN DAVID SHAUB† ABSTRACT Both the executive branch and Congress claim the final word in oversight disputes. Congress asserts its subpoenas are legally binding. The executive branch claims the final authority to assert executive privilege and, accordingly, to refuse to comply with a subpoena without consequence. These divergent views stem in large part from the relative absence of any judicial precedent, including not a single Supreme Court decision on the privilege in the context of congressional oversight. In that vacuum—unconstrained by precedent—the executive branch has developed a comprehensive theory of executive privilege to support and implement prophylactic doctrines that render Congress largely powerless in oversight disputes. For the first time, this Article sets out the full extent of the executive branch’s doctrine, the various pieces of which have been expressed in OLC opinions, letters to Congress, and court filings. Existing scholarship largely ignores this doctrine and addresses executive privilege on the basis Copyright © 2020 Jonathan David Shaub † Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law; J.D., Northwestern Pritzker School of Law; B.A., Vanderbilt University. This article concerns congressional oversight disputes on which I worked as an Attorney-Adviser in the Office of Legal Counsel at the U.S. Department of Justice, but none of the information contained in this article is confidential or subject to any claim of privilege. This paper benefitted mightily from numerous conversations with and comments from my OLC colleagues, particularly Amin Aminfar, John Bies, Martine Cicconi, Kirti Datla, Adele El- Khouri, Caroline Flynn, Troy McKenzie, Annie Owens, Matt Roberts, and Shalev Roisman.
    [Show full text]
  • Clemson Commencement Program, May 1999 Clemson University
    Clemson University TigerPrints Clemson Commencement Programs Academic Affairs 5-1-1999 Clemson Commencement Program, May 1999 Clemson University Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/comm_programs Materials in this collection may be protected by copyright law (Title 17, U.S. code). Use of these materials beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. For additional rights information, please contact Kirstin O'Keefe (kokeefe [at] clemson [dot] edu) For additional information about the collections, please contact the Special Collections and Archives by phone at 864.656.3031 or via email at cuscl [at] clemson [dot] edu Recommended Citation University, Clemson, "Clemson Commencement Program, May 1999" (1999). Clemson Commencement Programs. 216. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/comm_programs/216 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Affairs at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in Clemson Commencement Programs by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. One Hundred Third Commencement May 7, 1999 Clemson, South Carolina Congratulatory Applause You are requested to refrain from loud expressions of pleasure for individual graduates. Such expressions frequently detract from the recognition due the next graduate in line. Your cooperation is respectfully requested. Graduation Friday, May 7, 1999 9:30 a.m. Littlejohn Coliseum 2:30 p.m. ORDER OF CEREMONIES (Audience will please stand as faculty and candidates march in and remain standing for the invocation.) Invocation Laura Adair Ramage, Student Representative Erin Leigh Batth, Student Representative Introduction of Trustees President Constantine W.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 142 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 No. 128 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. and was We still have a lot of work to do. The The Democrats in Congress are also called to order by the Speaker pro tem- President vetoed our balanced budget. making plans to repeal the welfare re- pore [Mr. HANCOCK]. He vetoed tax cuts for working fami- form bill signed by the President, and f lies. And he has consistently pushed for they have not given up on the idea of more wasteful, Washington spending. having the Government take over our DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO Democrats in Congress are leading health care system. The Democrat TEMPORE the reaction against common sense. I agenda remains, as always, to put the The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- respect many Members of this body for Government first. They want more fore the House the following commu- standing up for their liberal philoso- Government spending, more Govern- nication from the Speaker: phy. For instance, the gentleman from ment control, more Government influ- WASHINGTON, DC, New York [Mr. RANGEL], who is poised ence over the lives of the American September 17, 1996. to become the chairman of the com- people. I hereby designate the Honorable MEL HAN- mittee that oversees taxes in the Con- COCK to act as Speaker pro tempore on this gress should the Democrats regain con- Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 486 105Th Congress, 2D Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Report 105–845
    1 Union Calendar No. 486 105th Congress, 2d Session ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± House Report 105±845 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DURING THE ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS PURSUANT TO CLAUSE 1(d) RULE XI OF THE RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JANUARY 2, 1999.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 52±984 WASHINGTON : 1999 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman 1 F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico 5 ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia ELTON GALLEGLY, California MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB INGLIS, South Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia MAXINE WATERS, California STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts SONNY BONO, California 2 WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts ED BRYANT, Tennessee ROBERT WEXLER, Florida STEVE CHABOT, Ohio STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey BOB BARR, Georgia THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin 7 WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas EDWARD A. PEASE, Indiana CHRISTOPHER B. CANNON, Utah JAMES E. ROGAN, California 3 LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina 4 MARY BONO, California 6 THOMAS E. MOONEY, SR., Chief of Staff-General Counsel JON W. DUDAS, Deputy General Counsel-Staff Director JULIAN EPSTEIN, Minority Chief Counsel and Staff Director PERRY APELBAUM, Minority General Counsel ÐÐÐÐÐ 1 Henry J.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Records
    CHURCH RECORDS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH COMPILED AND EDITED BY REV. NORMAN CARLYSLE YOUNG, M.Div.; M.Ed. AND NAOMI KATHLEEN IVEY HORNER UPDATED June 30, 2021 AN HISTORICAL RECORDS VOLUME PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE ARCHIVES & HISTORY MINISTRY TEAM Printed by McElvany & Company Printing and Publishing 1 Copyright © 2021 by The Western Pennsylvania Annual Conference of The United Methodist Church All Rights Reserved 2 PREFACE The Historical Volume Church Records Western Pennsylvania Conference of The United Methodist Church was last printed in 2003. In order to keep the Church Records current, Janet & Norman C. Young were retained to update the more recent appointments and make necessary corrections as new information became available. Since their death, Naomi Horner has graciously volunteered to continue updating the volume. New information comes from the readers making corrections and suggestions. New information also comes from Naomi’s continued research on the companion volume Pastoral Records. The Western Pennsylvania Commission on Archives & History decided to make this revision and update available on these webpages www.wpaumc.org0H so that the most current information remains accessible and for corrections to continue to refine the document. This volume has had long history of Revision. Described by Herbert E. Boyd in his 1957 volume on the Erie Methodist Preface as a “compendium…intended primarily as an administrative tool.” He then credits forerunners back to 1898. At that time, this primarily contained Pastoral Records. Grafton T. Reynolds edited for the Pittsburgh Methodist Episcopal Church a similar volume through 1927. W. Guy Smeltzer divided his 1969 revision between chapters on Pastoral Records and Church Records.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri State Archives Finding Aid 5.20
    Missouri State Archives Finding Aid 5.20 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE COMMISSIONS PARDONS, 1836- Abstract: Pardons (1836-2018), restorations of citizenship, and commutations for Missouri convicts. Extent: 66 cubic ft. (165 legal-size Hollinger boxes) Physical Description: Paper Location: MSA Stacks ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Alternative Formats: Microfilm (S95-S123) of the Pardon Papers, 1837-1909, was made before additions, interfiles, and merging of the series. Most of the unmicrofilmed material will be found from 1854-1876 (pardon certificates and presidential pardons from an unprocessed box) and 1892-1909 (formerly restorations of citizenship). Also, stray records found in the Senior Reference Archivist’s office from 1836-1920 in Box 164 and interfiles (bulk 1860) from 2 Hollinger boxes found in the stacks, a portion of which are in Box 163. Access Restrictions: Applications or petitions listing the social security numbers of living people are confidential and must be provided to patrons in an alternative format. At the discretion of the Senior Reference Archivist, some records from the Board of Probation and Parole may be restricted per RSMo 549.500. Publication Restrictions: Copyright is in the public domain. Preferred Citation: [Name], [Date]; Pardons, 1836- ; Commissions; Office of Secretary of State, Record Group 5; Missouri State Archives, Jefferson City. Acquisition Information: Agency transfer. PARDONS Processing Information: Processing done by various staff members and completed by Mary Kay Coker on October 30, 2007. Combined the series Pardon Papers and Restorations of Citizenship because the latter, especially in later years, contained a large proportion of pardons. The two series were split at 1910 but a later addition overlapped from 1892 to 1909 and these records were left in their respective boxes but listed chronologically in the finding aid.
    [Show full text]