1/9/2015 1 G Phylum Chordata Characteristics – May Be With

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1/9/2015 1 G Phylum Chordata Characteristics – May Be With 1/9/2015 Vertebrate Evolution Z Phylum Chordata characteristics – may be with organism its entire life or only during a certain developmental stage 1. Dorsal, hollow nerve cord 2. Flexible supportive rod (notochord) running along dorsum just ventral to nerve cord 3. Pharyngeal slits or pouches 4. A tail at some point in development Z Phylum Chordata has 3 subphyla W Urochordata – tunicates Z Adults are sessile marine animals with gill slits Z Larvae are free-swimming and possess notochord and nerve cord in muscular tail Z Tail is reabsorbed when larvae transforms into an adult 1 1 1/9/2015 W Cephalochordata –lancelets Z Small marine animals that live in sand in shallow water Z Retains gill slits, notochord, and nerve cord thru life W Vertebrata – chordates with a “backbone” Z Persistent notochord, or vertebral column of bone or cartilage Z All possess a cranium Z All embryos pass thru a stage when pharyngeal pouches are present Lamprey ammocoete 2 2 1/9/2015 Jawless Fish Hagfish Lamprey Vertebrate Evolution 1. Tunicate larvae 2. Lancelet 3. Larval lamprey (ammocoete) and jawless fishes 4. Jaw development from anterior pharyngeal arches – capture and ingestion of more food sources 5. Paired fin evolution A. Eventually leads to tetrapod limbs B. Fin spine theory – spiny sharks (acanthodians) had up to 7 pairs of spines along trunk and these may have led to front and rear paired fins 3 3 1/9/2015 Z Emergence onto land W Extinct lobe-finned fishes called rhipidistians seem to be the most likely tetrapod ancestor Z Similar to modern lungfish and had gills and probably lungs to breathe air Z Teeth and limb bones closely resemble early amphibian bones 4 4 1/9/2015 W Modern “walking” fish include walking catfish, mudskippers, and lungfish Lungfish – found in Mudskipper South America, Africa, and Australia Walking catfish – from southeast Asia but now found in Florida W Earliest known amphibians were labyrinthodonts Z Had traits of lobe-finned fish and later tetrapods Z Most modern salamanders still cannot fully support themselves with their limbs and have unshelled eggs like fish 5 5 1/9/2015 Z Evolutionary timeline: W Jawless fish – Cambrian Period (530 MYA) W Jawed fish – explosion of fish diversity in Silurian Period (425 MYA) W Terrestrial amphibians – Devonian Period (400 MYA) Z Adaptations of some lobe-finned fish that allowed emergence onto land: 1. Limbs with digits 2. Lungs 3. A primitive neck Z Fish-like ancestors probably evolved these traits in shallow swamps with stagnant water 6 6 1/9/2015 W Competition and an abundance of unexploited resources may have drove vertebrates onto land W Another theory is that early amphibians lived and fed in water but deposited eggs in moist places on land for better survival of eggs and larvae 7 7 1/9/2015 W The amniotic egg: reptiles, birds, mammals Z Carboniferous Period (320 MYA) Z To this day, amphibian eggs are still very similar to those of fish and must be placed in moist areas to develop with no protective shell Fish Frog Z Seems to have developed to increase protection of terrestrial eggs from microbes Z First, a fibrous shell evolved then, as added protection, a calcerous layer was added Z All modern-day reptiles deposit calcium crystals in a fibrous matrix 8 8 1/9/2015 Z Today, most reptile eggs must absorb moisture from the environment to complete development Z It is not clear whether extraembyronic membranes evolved within primitive eggs or female’s oviducts Z Earliest amniotes were a group of labyrinthodonts called anthracosaurs (below) Z Amniotes – extraembryonic membranes W Do not need water to reproduce, no larval stage W Chorion, amnion, and allantois provide metabolic support for developing embryo W Yolk sac provides food 9 9 1/9/2015 Z Early reptiles – Carboniferous Period (300 MYA) W During this time, plants were becoming abundant and diverse on land providing a food source W Until then, vertebrates were primarily carnivorous, as most living primitive fishes (catfish, lungfish, gar, bowfin) and amphibians are today Z The only terrestrial animal prey available was fast- moving invertebrates (spiders, centipedes, and mites) Z An explosion of reptile species began (adaptive radiation) when they became herbivorous Z Earliest reptiles were cotylosaurs, represented by Hylonomus which still had many amphibian-like traits such as its skull, limbs, and girdle 10 10 1/9/2015 Therapsida – the earliest mammals Permian Period 250 MYA Reptiles to Birds W Earliest known bird is Archaeopteryx lithographica which lived 155 MYA W Range in size from a 2 gram hummingbird to a 100,000 gram ostrich (200-300 lbs.) 11 11 1/9/2015 Z Similarities: 1. Both have single occipital condyle which attach the skull to the vertebral column in a ball-and-socket fashion (mammal 2) 2. Both have a simple middle ear with one ear bone, the stapes (mammals have 3 middle ear bones) 3. Both have lower jaws composed of 5 or 6 bones on either side (mammal jaws are 1 bone) 4. Scales on the legs of birds are similar to reptile scales 5. Both lay shelled eggs 12 12 1/9/2015 6. In both, females have the hetergametic sex chromosome combination ZW (in mammals, it’s the males that have this condition with XY combination) 7. Both have nucleated red blood cells (mammals lack nuclei in red blood cells) Z Fossil record W 5 complete Archaeopteryx fossils have been found, all from central Europe, that date from 135-155 MYA during the Jurassic period when Europe had a tropical climate W It was a crow-size, bipedal “reptile” with a blunt snout and small reptilian teeth W Paleontologists believe it was similar to modern strong- running, terrestrial birds that could leap into trees and make short flights between branches and trees W Primary wing feathers were asymmetrical as with modern birds capable of flight Z Flightless birds have symmetrical vanes 13 13 1/9/2015 Possible Feather Evolution Possible Reptilian Ancestors 14 14 1/9/2015 Z Today, birds have evolved into many forms to utilize different food resources in different habitats (adaptive radiation) 15 15 1/9/2015 Class Aves 1. Warm-blooded, endothermic, homeotherm 2. Descended from bipedal, lizard-like reptiles a) Lay eggs b) Have scales on beaks and legs c) Feathers are specialized scales 3. Highly variable size: largest is ostrich (330 lbs) and smallest is scintillant hummingbird (0.08 oz.) 4. Adaptations to flying (all geared toward high power and low weight) a) Mostly hollow bones with strut supports (some birds’ feathers weigh more than skeleton) b) Fused bones - hip girdle with sacral vertebrae, hand bones of wings are absent or fused c) Breast bone (sternum) modified into keel for attachment of large flight muscles d) Feathers are extremely well-suited for insulation, streamlining, weight reduction, and flight 5. About 9,020 species worldwide and about 400 species that are found in MS, including migrants 16 1 1/9/2015 Z Bird are very diverse with: W 31 Orders W 186 Families W 2,029 Genera Z We will cover 22 Orders Z Order Rheiformes - rheas W Family Rheidae - all in one family; only 2 species Z Largest living New World birds (5 ft, 50 lbs) Z Flightless and live in grasslands of South America Z Order Struthioniformes - ostrich W Family Struthionidae - 1 sp. living Z Largest living bird (8 ft, 300 lbs) Z Flightless and lives in grasslands of Africa Z Order Casuariiformes – large flightless birds of New Zealand and Australia W Family Casuariidae – cassowaries (3 species) W Family Dromaiidae - emu (1 sp.) 17 2 1/9/2015 Z Order Dinornithiformes - kiwis W Family Apterygidae - 3 living species Z Short, stocky, flightless birds of New Zealand Z Forage at night on the ground for invertebrates and roost and nest in burrows Pied-billed grebe Z Order Podicipediformes - grebes W Family Podicipedidae - only family with 21 species Z Foot-propelled diving birds Z Occur worldwide with one in MS (pied-billed grebe) Z Order Sphenisciformes - penguins W Family Spheniscidae - only family with 18 spp Z Occurs only in southern oceans and northern limit is Galapagos Islands on the equator off of Ecuador Z Wing-propelled diving birds that eat fish Z The emperor penguin can dive to 900 ft. and stay under for over 20 minutes Emperor Galapagos 18 3 1/9/2015 Z Order Pelecaniformes - pelicans, cormorants, snake birds W Long beaks with throat pouches that hold fish W Nest in large colonies Anhinga W Family Pelecanidae – pelicans Brown pelican Z 8 species worldwide and 2 in MS (brown, American white) W Family Phalacrocoracidae – cormorants Z 33 species worldwide, 1 in MS (double-crested) Z Once was rare but now common and a nuisance for catfish farmers W Family Anhingidae - snake bird/anhinga/water turkey Z 4 species worldwide and 1 in MS Z Order Ciconiiformes - herons, egrets, stork, ibis, spoonbill W Long-necked and long-legged waders W Nest in colonies along shores and marshes W Family Ardeidae - herons, egrets, and bitterns Z 64 species worldwide, 12 in MS W Family Ciconiidae - storks, 1 species in MS (wood stork) W Family Threskiornithidae - ibises and spoonbills, 3 species in MS (white and glossy ibis and roseate spoonbill) 19 4 1/9/2015 Roseatte spoonbill Tricolored heron Scarlet ibis Bittern Wood stork Z Order Anseriformes W Family Anatidae - ducks, geese, and swans Z Broad bills with many tactile nerve endings Z Body covered in down and oily feathers Z 158 species worldwide, about 26 in MS Canada goose Mute swan Canvasback 20 5 1/9/2015 Z Order Falconiformes – vultures, eagles, hawks, falcons W Diurnal birds of prey with strong bill that is hooked at tip and feet with sharp curved
Recommended publications
  • Costa Rica 2020
    Sunrise Birding LLC COSTA RICA TRIP REPORT January 30 – February 5, 2020 Photos: Talamanca Hummingbird, Sunbittern, Resplendent Quetzal, Congenial Group! Sunrise Birding LLC COSTA RICA TRIP REPORT January 30 – February 5, 2020 Leaders: Frank Mantlik & Vernon Campos Report and photos by Frank Mantlik Highlights and top sightings of the trip as voted by participants Resplendent Quetzals, multi 20 species of hummingbirds Spectacled Owl 2 CR & 32 Regional Endemics Bare-shanked Screech Owl 4 species Owls seen in 70 Black-and-white Owl minutes Suzy the “owling” dog Russet-naped Wood-Rail Keel-billed Toucan Great Potoo Tayra!!! Long-tailed Silky-Flycatcher Black-faced Solitaire (& song) Rufous-browed Peppershrike Amazing flora, fauna, & trails American Pygmy Kingfisher Sunbittern Orange-billed Sparrow Wayne’s insect show-and-tell Volcano Hummingbird Spangle-cheeked Tanager Purple-crowned Fairy, bathing Rancho Naturalista Turquoise-browed Motmot Golden-hooded Tanager White-nosed Coati Vernon as guide and driver January 29 - Arrival San Jose All participants arrived a day early, staying at Hotel Bougainvillea. Those who arrived in daylight had time to explore the phenomenal gardens, despite a rain storm. Day 1 - January 30 Optional day-trip to Carara National Park Guides Vernon and Frank offered an optional day trip to Carara National Park before the tour officially began and all tour participants took advantage of this special opportunity. As such, we are including the sightings from this day trip in the overall tour report. We departed the Hotel at 05:40 for the drive to the National Park. En route we stopped along the road to view a beautiful Turquoise-browed Motmot.
    [Show full text]
  • Morocco SD 2017 Trip Report
    Morocco 9th - 18th March 2017 Desert Sparrow is surely one of the best looking and most sought after of all the sparrows Tour Leader: Lisle Gwynn All photos in this report were taken by Lisle Gwynn on this tour Species depicted in photographs are named in BOLD RED www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] Introduction Morocco is a fascinating destination, and one that many world birders have neglected for too long. It is increasingly becoming a go-to country for European birders in Spring, and offers some of the most exciting birding in the Western Palearctic biogeographic region. Not only does it offer a chance to see Afro-European migration at its peak, but it also offers a plethora of exciting and special endemic and near-endemic species at its core. Add to this the fact that throughout the tour we have excellent accommodation and some of the best food available anywhere in the world (in my opinion), it all goes toward making Morocco a must-visit location for any birder branching out into the world. It is also currently by far the safest North African country to visit, with little crime and none of the problems that plague the rest of the region, and therefore presents a comfortable and safe opportunity to experience North Africa. This year’s tour followed our tried and tested route, starting in the manic city of Marrakesh at a serene hotel amongst the craziness, a quick departure to the idyllic Ourika Valley and the high snow-capped peaks of Oukameiden and the high Atlas Mountains, before descending to the stony desert around Boumalne Dades and the ochre-cast dunes of the Sahara at Erg Chebbi.
    [Show full text]
  • 500 Natural Sciences and Mathematics
    500 500 Natural sciences and mathematics Natural sciences: sciences that deal with matter and energy, or with objects and processes observable in nature Class here interdisciplinary works on natural and applied sciences Class natural history in 508. Class scientific principles of a subject with the subject, plus notation 01 from Table 1, e.g., scientific principles of photography 770.1 For government policy on science, see 338.9; for applied sciences, see 600 See Manual at 231.7 vs. 213, 500, 576.8; also at 338.9 vs. 352.7, 500; also at 500 vs. 001 SUMMARY 500.2–.8 [Physical sciences, space sciences, groups of people] 501–509 Standard subdivisions and natural history 510 Mathematics 520 Astronomy and allied sciences 530 Physics 540 Chemistry and allied sciences 550 Earth sciences 560 Paleontology 570 Biology 580 Plants 590 Animals .2 Physical sciences For astronomy and allied sciences, see 520; for physics, see 530; for chemistry and allied sciences, see 540; for earth sciences, see 550 .5 Space sciences For astronomy, see 520; for earth sciences in other worlds, see 550. For space sciences aspects of a specific subject, see the subject, plus notation 091 from Table 1, e.g., chemical reactions in space 541.390919 See Manual at 520 vs. 500.5, 523.1, 530.1, 919.9 .8 Groups of people Add to base number 500.8 the numbers following —08 in notation 081–089 from Table 1, e.g., women in science 500.82 501 Philosophy and theory Class scientific method as a general research technique in 001.4; class scientific method applied in the natural sciences in 507.2 502 Miscellany 577 502 Dewey Decimal Classification 502 .8 Auxiliary techniques and procedures; apparatus, equipment, materials Including microscopy; microscopes; interdisciplinary works on microscopy Class stereology with compound microscopes, stereology with electron microscopes in 502; class interdisciplinary works on photomicrography in 778.3 For manufacture of microscopes, see 681.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowy Egret Egretta Thula
    Wyoming Species Account Snowy Egret Egretta thula REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: Migratory Bird USFS R2: No special status USFS R4: No special status Wyoming BLM: No special status State of Wyoming: Protected Bird CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: No special status WGFD: NSS3 (Bb), Tier II WYNDD: G5, S1S2 Wyoming Contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern PIF Continental Concern Score: Not ranked STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS The Wyoming Natural Diversity Database has assigned Snowy Egret (Egretta thula) a state conservation rank ranging from S1 (Critically Imperiled) to S2 (Imperiled) because of uncertainty about population trends for this species in Wyoming. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: There are currently two recognized subspecies of Snowy Egret, which are weakly distinguished by minor size differences: E. t. thula breeds in eastern North America, the Greater Antilles, and throughout South America, while E. t. brewsteri breeds in western North America west of the Rocky Mountains 1, 2. Both subspecies are likely found in Wyoming 3, but this has not been confirmed. Description: Identification of Snowy Egret is possible in the field. It is a medium heron; adults weigh approximately 370 g, range in length from 56–66 cm, and have wingspans of approximately 100 cm 1. Males are slightly larger, but the sexes are otherwise similar in appearance 1. Breeding adults have uniform white plumage with long plumes of delicate feathers on the nape, breast, and lower back that are used in courtship displays; a long S-curved neck; yellow eyes; bright lores that range from dark yellow to red; a long black bill; long black legs; and dark yellow or orange feet 1, 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Tricolored Herons and Great Egrets Use Double- Crested Cormorants As Beaters While Foraging
    Tricolored Herons and Great Egrets Use Double- crested Cormorants as Beaters While Foraging William E. Davis, Jr. Many animals follow other animals described as beaters, and capture prey disturbed by them. Various species of herons have been observed using beaters, including Eastern Reef Herons using predatory fish (Recher and Recher 1969), Snowy Egrets using grebes (Leek 1971), Snowy and Great egrets using mergansers and cormorants (Christman 1957), White-faced Herons using Australian White Ibises (Davis 1985), and, of course. Cattle Egrets using cattle, tractors, elephants, hippopotamuses, and rhinoceroses (Telfair 1994). The only reference to Tricolored Herons using beaters was Parks and Dressier (1963), who reported Snowy Egrets and a Tricolored Heron using Hooded Mergansers as beaters. Furthermore, the definitive account of Tricolored Herons (Frederick 1997) states “...not reported to benefit greatly from piracy, beating, or other social interactions.” Hence, my observations of Tricolored Herons using Double-crested Cormorants as beaters may be of some interest. On March 11, 1999,1 was watching a Tricolored Heron walking along the edge of a ten-meter-wide water impoundment along Cross Dike Trail at J.N. ‘Ding’ Darling National Wildlife Refuge on Sanibel Island, Florida. The bird suddenly stopped and flew to the other side of the impoundment to the shoreline of dense mangroves. It landed at the water’s edge, near an actively foraging Double-crested Cormorant. The cormorant was swimming along the shoreline, partially submerged, and as it moved along the shore, the heron followed it by walking rapidly. When the heron fell behind, it made short flights to catch up.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Breeding Behavior of the Royal Tern (Sterna Maxima) with Particular Emphasis on Prey Size Selectivity
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 Aspects of Breeding Behavior of the Royal Tern (Sterna maxima) with Particular Emphasis on Prey Size Selectivity William James Ihle College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Ihle, William James, "Aspects of Breeding Behavior of the Royal Tern (Sterna maxima) with Particular Emphasis on Prey Size Selectivity" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625247. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4aq2-2y93 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASPECTS OF BREEDING BEHAVIOR OF THE ROYAL TERN (STERNA MAXIMA) n WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON PREY SIZE SELECTIVITY A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by William J. Ihle 1984 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 1MI \MLu Author Approved, April 1984 Mitchell A. Byrd m Stewart A. Ware R/ft R. Michael Erwin DEDICATION To Mom, for without her love and encouragement this thesis would not have been completed. FRONTISPIECE. Begging royal tern chick and its parent in the creche are surrounded by conspecific food parasites immediate!y after a feeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Peregrine Falcon
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group PEREGRINE FALCON Falco peregrinus Family: FALCONIDAE Order: FALCONIFORMES Class: AVES B129 Written by: C. Polite, J. Pratt Reviewed by: L. Kiff Edited by: L. Kiff DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY Very uncommon breeding resident, and uncommon as a migrant. Active nesting sites are known along the coast north of Santa Barbara, in the Sierra Nevada, and in other mountains of northern California. In winter, found inland throughout the Central Valley, and occasionally on the Channel Islands. Migrants occur along the coast, and in the western Sierra Nevada in spring and fall. Breeds mostly in woodland, forest, and coastal habitats. Riparian areas and coastal and inland wetlands are important habitats yearlong, especially in nonbreeding seasons. Population has declined drastically in recent years (Thelander 1975,1976); 39 breeding pairs were known in California in 1981 (Monk 1981). Decline associated mostly with DDE contamination. Coastal population apparently reproducing poorly, perhaps because of heavier DDE load received from migrant prey. The State has established 2 ecological reserves to protect nesting sites. A captive rearing program has been established to augment the wild population, and numbers are increasing (Monk 1981). SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Swoops from flight onto flying prey, chases in flight, rarely hunts from a perch. Takes a variety of birds up to ducks in size; occasionally takes mammals, insects, and fish. In Utah, Porter and White (1973) reported that 19 nests averaged 5.3 km (3.3 mi) from the nearest foraging marsh, and 12.2 km (7.6 mi) from the nearest marsh over 130 ha (320 ac) in area.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest-Site Selection by Western Screech-Owls in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 63 Number 4 Article 16 12-3-2003 Nest-site selection by Western Screech-Owls in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona Paul C. Hardy University of Arizona, Tucson Michael L. Morrison University of California, Bishop Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Hardy, Paul C. and Morrison, Michael L. (2003) "Nest-site selection by Western Screech-Owls in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 63 : No. 4 , Article 16. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol63/iss4/16 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 63(4), ©2003, pp. 533-537 NEST~SITE SELECTION BY WESTERN SCREECH~OWLS IN THE SONORAN DESERT, ARIZONA Paul C. Hardyl,2 and Michael L. Morrison3 Key words: Gila Woodpecker, Gilded Flicker, nest-site selection, Otus kennicottii, saguaro cacti, Sonoran Desert, West­ ern Screech~Owl. The Western ScreecbOwl (Otus kennicottii) valley includes the creosote (Larrea triden­ is a small, nocturnal, secondary caVity-nesting tata)~white bursage (Ambrosia dumosa) series, bird that is a year-round resident throughout and in runnels and washes, the mixed-scrub much of western North America and Mexico series (Turner and Brown 1994). Temperatures (Marshall 1957, Phillips et al. 1964, AOU 1983, for the Arizona Upland and Lower Colorado Johnsgard 1988, Cannings and Angell 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • ON 1196 NEW.Fm
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 25: 237–243, 2014 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society NON-RANDOM ORIENTATION IN WOODPECKER CAVITY ENTRANCES IN A TROPICAL RAIN FOREST Daniel Rico1 & Luis Sandoval2,3 1The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, Canada, N9B3P4. 3Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica, CP 2090. E-mail: [email protected] Orientación no al azar de las entradas de las cavidades de carpinteros en un bosque tropical. Key words: Pale-billed Woodpecker, Campephilus guatemalensis, Chestnut-colored Woodpecker, Celeus castaneus, Lineated Woodpecker, Dryocopus lineatus, Black-cheeked Woodpecker, Melanerpes pucherani, Costa Rica, Picidae. INTRODUCTION tics such as vegetation coverage of the nesting substrate, surrounding vegetation, and forest Nest site selection play’s one of the main roles age (Aitken et al. 2002, Adkins Giese & Cuth- in the breeding success of birds, because this bert 2003, Sandoval & Barrantes 2006). Nest selection influences the survival of eggs, orientation also plays an important role in the chicks, and adults by inducing variables such breeding success of woodpeckers, because the as the microclimatic conditions of the nest orientation positively influences the microcli- and probability of being detected by preda- mate conditions inside the nest cavity (Hooge tors (Viñuela & Sunyer 1992). Although et al. 1999, Wiebe 2001), by reducing the woodpecker nest site selections are well estab- exposure to direct wind currents, rainfalls, lished, the majority of this information is and/or extreme temperatures (Ardia et al. based on temperate forest species and com- 2006). Cavity entrance orientation showed munities (Newton 1998, Cornelius et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of Costa Rica March 19–31, 2019
    THE BEST OF COSTA RICA MARCH 19–31, 2019 Buffy-crowned Wood-Partridge © David Ascanio LEADERS: DAVID ASCANIO & MAURICIO CHINCHILLA LIST COMPILED BY: DAVID ASCANIO VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM THE BEST OF COSTA RICA March 19–31, 2019 By David Ascanio Photo album: https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidascanio/albums/72157706650233041 It’s about 02:00 AM in San José, and we are listening to the widespread and ubiquitous Clay-colored Robin singing outside our hotel windows. Yet, it was still too early to experience the real explosion of bird song, which usually happens after dawn. Then, after 05:30 AM, the chorus started when a vocal Great Kiskadee broke the morning silence, followed by the scratchy notes of two Hoffmann´s Woodpeckers, a nesting pair of Inca Doves, the ascending and monotonous song of the Yellow-bellied Elaenia, and the cacophony of an (apparently!) engaged pair of Rufous-naped Wrens. This was indeed a warm welcome to magical Costa Rica! To complement the first morning of birding, two boreal migrants, Baltimore Orioles and a Tennessee Warbler, joined the bird feast just outside the hotel area. Broad-billed Motmot . Photo: D. Ascanio © Victor Emanuel Nature Tours 2 The Best of Costa Rica, 2019 After breakfast, we drove towards the volcanic ring of Costa Rica. Circling the slope of Poas volcano, we eventually reached the inspiring Bosque de Paz. With its hummingbird feeders and trails transecting a beautiful moss-covered forest, this lodge offered us the opportunity to see one of Costa Rica´s most difficult-to-see Grallaridae, the Scaled Antpitta.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 156/Tuesday, August 13, 2013
    49186 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2013 / Rules and Regulations Black grouper, Mycteroperca bonaci individual fishing quota (IFQ) system. consistent with the terminology used in Yellowmouth grouper, Mycteroperca The new tilefish IFQ program became rest of that regulatory paragraph. The interstitialis effective November 1, 2009. After 3 introductory text on IFQ transfer Gag, Mycteroperca microlepis years of operation, it has become applications has been adjusted to more Scamp, Mycteroperca phenax apparent that some of the implementing Yellowfin grouper, Mycteroperca venenosa clearly explain why applications for Serranidae—Sea Basses regulations need to be clarified, permanent transfers are due before Black sea bass, Centropristis striata corrected, or modified to better reflect September 1, while applications for Sparidae—Porgies the intent of Amendment 1. temporary transfers are due before Jolthead porgy, Calamus bajonado On March 28, 2013, NMFS published October 10. Saucereye porgy, Calamus calamus a proposed rule in the Federal Register Whitebone porgy, Calamus leucosteus (78 FR 18947) proposing several minor Comments and Responses Knobbed porgy, Calamus nodosus corrections, clarifications, and Red porgy, Pagrus pagrus modifications to the regulations NMFS received no comments on the Scup, Stenotomus chrysops implementing Amendment 1. proposed rule. The following species are designated as Comments on the proposed rule were ecosystem component species: Classification Cottonwick, Haemulon melanurum accepted through April 29, 2013. No Bank sea bass, Centropristis ocyurus comments were received on the The Administrator, Northeast Region, Rock sea bass, Centropristis philadelphica measures, and the measures, as NMFS, determined that this final rule is Longspine porgy, Stenotomus caprinus proposed, are implemented by this final necessary for the management of the Ocean triggerfish, Canthidermis sufflamen rule.
    [Show full text]