Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (Adelges Tsugae) Surveillance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (Adelges Tsugae) Surveillance 1 St. Lawrence Eastern Lake Ontario Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management Special Note This report is to be considered as an addendum to the field reports from 2015 and 2016. The previous reports are attached to the end of this report. 2017 Field Survey Addendum to Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (Adelges tsugae) Surveillance Figure 1: Stand of Eastern Hemlocks at Salmon River Falls. Photo taken by Alicia Wood. SLELO-PRISM Early Detection Surveillance August 31th, September 5-7th & 11-12th, 2017 Report prepared by Bryna Daykin and Alicia Wood, 9/15/2017 Introduction and Background1 Hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae), native to Asia, is a small aphid-like insect that threatens the health and sustainability of eastern hemlocks (Tsuga canadensis). Hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) was first discovered in the United States in 1951 near Richmond Virginia, and has since spread throughout the northeastern U.S. and into the Midwest. Decline and mortality of hemlock after an infestation typically occurs between 4 and 10 years. Hemlocks stressed by drought, poor site conditions, disease, and other insect pests will show accelerated rates of mortality. 2,3 1 Introduction and Background edited from the 2015 SLELO-PRISM Hemlock Wooly Adelgid Survey, by Ben Hansknecht and Caitlin Muller: http://www.sleloinvasives.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/HWA-2015-Report-PDF.pdf 2 Information obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service: https://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/pest_al/hemlock/hwa05.htm 3 Information obtained from the St. Lawrence Eastern Lake Ontario Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management SLELO-PRISM: http://www.sleloinvasives.org/about-invasives/prevention-watch-list-species-in-slelo-region/hemlock-woolly- adelgid/ SLELO-PRISM c/o The Nature Conservancy 269 Ouderkirk Road. Pulaski, NY 13142 Rob Williams, Coordinator 2 Figure 2: From left to right: HWA eggs, HMA crawler, HWA nymphs in dormancy on the bases of the needles on an Eastern Hemlock tree, adult HWA. Photos from left to right taken by: Shimat Joseph, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org; Kelly Oten, North Carolina Forest Service, Bugwood.org; Ashley Lamb, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org; Michael Montgomery, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org. HWA is active in cooler months and dormant during the summer, producing two generations per year. HWA can only reproduce sexually on specific species of spruce trees which are not present in North America. Due to this, reproduction only occurs here asexually by parthenogenesis. This means that all HWA in North America are females, and that it only takes one HWA to create an infestation on a tree. There are six developmental stages for HWA: the egg, four nymphal instars (crawler) stages, and the adult (Figure 2; Figure 3). The crawlers are a dark reddish-brown to Figure 3: Hemlock Woolly Adelgid annual life purple-black in color and are typically found along the cycle. Photo obtained from the United States branches of hemlocks. These crawlers will attach to the Department of Agriculture, bases of Eastern hemlock needles by mid-July and https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/disturbance/invasive_s pecies/hwa/additional_resources/. become dormant. These immatures remain dormant until mid-October, at which point they resume feeding. As they feed they produce waxy “wool” like filaments that are secreted out of their pores, which serve as a protective cover to prevent the insect from drying out. Adults produce reddish eggs within these masses from March-June (Figure 2; Figure 3). The sticky, woolly covering allows the eggs to spread by attaching to deer, birds, other forest dwelling mammals, and by the wind. The woolly masses are present from October-June, and are the easiest way to detect a HWA infestation (Figure 4). 2,3,4,5,6 4 Information obtained from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst Extension Services: https://ag.umass.edu/landscape/fact- sheets/hemlock-woolly-adelgid-frequently-asked-questions 5 Information obtained from Maine’s Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry: http://www.maine.gov/dacf/mfs/forest_health/insects/hemlock_woolly_adelgid_fact_sheet.htm 6 Information obtained from the Encyclopedia of Life: http://eol.org/pages/7669301/details SLELO-PRISM c/o The Nature Conservancy 269 Ouderkirk Road. Pulaski, NY 13142 Rob Williams, Coordinator 3 Figure 4: Hemlock Woolly Adelgid masses on Eastern Hemlock tree branches. Left photo taken by Steven Katovich, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org. Right photo taken by Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources - Forestry, Bugwood.org. Look-alikes of HWA woolly masses include spittlebug (Aphrophora saratogensis) foam, oak skeletonizer (Bucculatrix ainsliella), elongate hemlock scale (Fiorinia externa), drops of pine sap, bird feces, and spider egg sacs (Figure 5). To distinguish these, note that the HWA woolly masses resemble cotton balls, are immobile, are not silky or stretchy but rather waxy, and don’t appear painted on as pine sap and bird feces do. Additionally, placement of the HWA woolly masses can help distinguish the species, as HWA masses are always found on the branches at needle bases, while spider eggs are often laid on the needles. Additionally, spider eggs will never appear as clumped as HWA masses (Figure 4; Figure 5). 8 Figure 5: HWA look-alikes. From top left to top right: elongate hemlock scale7, oak skeletonizer8, spittlebug foam7. The bottom left photo is pine sap8 and both the bottom middle and bottom right photos are spider eggs9. Note the placement of the spider eggs on the needles, a characteristic that distinguishes them from HWA woolly masses. 7 Photos obtained from Ohio Department of Natural Resources: http://ohiodnr.gov/hemlock-woolly-adelgid-in-ohio/learn-more- about-hwa/post/hwa-or-not-look-alike-pests 8 Photos obtained from University of New Hampshire Extension Services: https://extension.unh.edu/resources/files/Resource002109_Rep3114.pdf 9 Photos taken by Alicia Wood and Bryna Daykin SLELO-PRISM c/o The Nature Conservancy 269 Ouderkirk Road. Pulaski, NY 13142 Rob Williams, Coordinator 4 This insect feeds directly from the storage cells of hemlocks, causing needle death and progressing to twig and branch death. The needles lose color becoming yellow and grey, dry out, and fall off branches. As the insects’ feeding progresses the terminal buds die, preventing new shoot growth. Within two years this dieback can be observed in major limbs. The decline in health typically occurs first from the bottom limbs before continuing upward toward the top of the tree. HWA infestations cause death to mature hemlock trees within 3 to 10 3,4,5,6,10 years. Figure 6: Map of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid detections in New York State. Map created by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/86382.html. The blue line on the map outlines the Adirondack region. HWA has been observed in Cayuga and Onondaga Counties, which borders the SLELO- PRISM (Figure 6). This species is considered a ‘Prevention “Watch-list” Species’, whose arrival could be detrimental to the ecosystems found within the PRISM. One area of special concern is the southern Tug Hill region. Eastern Hemlock is ecologically important, as it is frequently found along exposed slopes, protected gorges, and streams. Hemlock creates a cool, damp, and shaded environment which supports a wide variety of organisms, including salamanders. Throughout the winter hemlock provides shelter and food for wildlife. Studies of forests damaged by HWA in the southern U.S. have shown that a decline in hemlock populations can cause a decline in other plant and animal populations, producing drastic changes to ecosystem processes. 3,10 10 Information obtained from Cornell University Cooperative Extension: http://www.nyis.info/index.php?action=invasive_detail&id=24 SLELO-PRISM c/o The Nature Conservancy 269 Ouderkirk Road. Pulaski, NY 13142 Rob Williams, Coordinator 5 Survey Methods and Objectives The priority conservation area for this survey was the southern Tug Hill region, on the southern-most side of the SLELO-PRISM. This section of the SLELO-PRISM is considered more likely to contain HWA as this species has been found in other southern regions of the state (Figure 6). The eleven sites surveyed in 2015 and 2016 were resurveyed in 2017. These sites were selected based on their high abundance of eastern hemlock stands, and included Salmon River Falls, Chateaugay State Forest, Selkirk Shores State Park, Mexico Point State Park, Happy Valley Wildlife Management Area, Mad River State Forest, Forest Park, Buck Hill State Forest, Clark Hill State Forest, Penn Mountain State Forest, and Trenton Greenbelt (Figure 7; Figures 9-19). These sites were surveyed for points with dense stands of eastern hemlock trees, consisting of at least 20 trees. Additionally, the Early Detection Team assessed the overall health of the eastern hemlock trees at each point. Signs of poor health including dieback, loss of needles, and needle discoloration (Figure 8) can indicate tree infestation by the HWA species. However, these symptoms can also be a result of other issues, such as nutrient deficiency. Figure 7: Areas surveyed for Hemlock Woolly Adelgid within the SLELO-PRISM. To locate and mark new points at each of the survey sites, a handheld Garmin GPSmap 60CSx was used. Unlike previous years, the 2017 survey did not involve an extensive examination of the trees at each stand, as the survey was conducted in late summer when the cotton-like masses were not yet present on branches. However, samples were taken from trees at each point and were closely examined under microscopes by the Early Detection Team for nymphs. At this time of year, HWA nymphs are found in dormancy on the bases of eastern hemlock needles (Figure 2; Figure 3). No HWA nymphs were found on any of the branches examined. The purpose of this survey was to determine priority areas for volunteers to come back to and survey in mid-October, when the woolly masses are visible, as shown in Figure 4.
Recommended publications
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2008
    National List of Beaches September 2008 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-08-004 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama........................................................................................................................................... 3 Alaska .............................................................................................................................................. 5 California.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Connecticut .................................................................................................................................... 15 Delaware........................................................................................................................................ 17 Florida ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Lake Ontario Basin: Tables 1
    SE Lake Ontario Table 1. Multi-Resolution Land Classification (MRLC) land cover classifications and corresponding percent cover in the SE Lake Ontario Basin. Classification % Cover Deciduous Forest 34.17 Row Crops 24.38 Pasture/Hay 15.53 Mixed Forest 11.01 Water 5.01 Wooded Wetlands 3.17 Low Intensity Residential 2.57 Evergreen Forest 1.32 Parks, Lawns, Golf Courses 1.07 High Intensity Commercial/Industrial 0.79 High Intensity Residential 0.60 Emergent Wetlands 0.24 Barren; Quarries, Strip Mines, Gravel Pits 0.11 SE Lake Ontario Table 2. Species of Greatest Conservation Need currently occurring in the SE Lake Ontario Basin (n=129). Species are sorted alphabetically by taxonomic group and species common name. The Species Group designation is included, indicating which Species Group Report in the appendix will contain the full information about the species. The Stability of this basin's population is also indicated for each species. TaxaGroup SpeciesGroup Species Stability Bird Bald Eagle Bald eagle Increasing Bird Beach and Island ground-nesting birds Common tern Unknown Bird Breeding waterfowl Blue-winged teal Decreasing Bird Breeding waterfowl Ruddy duck Increasing Bird Colonial-nesting herons Black-crowned night-heron Decreasing Bird Common loon Common loon Unknown Bird Common nighthawk Common nighthawk Decreasing Bird Deciduous/mixed forest breeding birds Black-throated blue warbler Stable Bird Deciduous/mixed forest breeding birds Cerulean warbler Increasing Bird Deciduous/mixed forest breeding birds Kentucky warbler Unknown Bird Deciduous/mixed
    [Show full text]
  • Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Survey-Pdf
    St. Lawrence Eastern Lake Ontario Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management 2016 Field Survey Hemlock Wooly Adelgid (Adelges tsugae) SLELO-PRISM Early Detection Surveillance August 17th – 29th, 2016 Report prepared by Ashley Gingeleski and Ben Hansknecht on September 12th, 2016 Figure 1. Stand of eastern hemlock trees. Photo by Ashley Gingeleski. Introduction and Background1 Hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae), native to Asia, is a small, aphid-like insect that threatens the health and sustainability of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) (Figure 1). Hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) was first discovered in the United States in 1951 near Richmond Virginia, and has since spread throughout the northeastern US and into the Midwest. Decline and mortality of hemlock after an infestation typically occurs between 4 and 10 years. Hemlocks stressed by drought, poor site conditions, disease, and other insect pests will show accelerated rates of mortality. HWA is active in cooler months and dormant during the summer, producing two generations per year. There are six developmental stages for HWA: the egg, four nymphal instars known as crawlers, and immobile adults. The crawlers are a dark reddish-brown to purple-black in color and are typically found along the branches of hemlock. These crawlers will attach to the base of a needle, feed, and loose mobility. Adults are less than one 16th of an inch long at maturity and produce a wool-like wax filament on the underside of branches to protect itself and Figure 2. Woolly egg masses produced by its eggs (Figure 2). The sticky, waxy covering produced hemlock woolly adelgid on eastern hemlock allows for the eggs to spread by attaching to deer, birds, tree branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Waters
    June 2011 Testing the Waters A Guide to Water Quality at Vacation Beaches twenty-first AnnuA l r eport Authors Mark Dorfman Kirsten Sinclair Rosselot Project Design and Development Jon Devine Natural Resources Defense Council About NRDC The Natural Resources Defense Council is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Montana, and Beijing. Visit us at www.nrdc.org. Acknowledgments NRDC wishes to acknowledge the support of the Morris & Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, the Campbell Foundation, Environment Now, the McKnight Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Pisces Foundation, Resources Legacy Fund Foundation, the Summit Fund of Washington, and the TOSA Foundation. NRDC would like to thank Josh Mogerman and Robyn Fischer for researching and reviewing various aspects of the report this year and Carol James for distributing the report nationwide. Thank you to Alexandra Kennaugh for managing the production of the report, to Elise Marton for proofreading the report, to Sue Rossi for designing it, and to Kathryn McGrath, Will Tam, and Auden Shim for creating a dynamic presentation of the report on the NRDC website. We would also like to thank Ynes Cabral and Linda Escalante for their skillful Spanish translations. Many thanks to members of our media team—Courtney Hamilton, Elizabeth Heyd, Valerie Jaffee, Jessica Lass, Josh Mogerman, Jenny Powers, and Kate Slusark—for orchestrating the release of the report to the press.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2018 Volume 14 Issue 9
    County Hunter News September 2018 Volume 14 Issue 9 Welcome to the On-Line County Hunter News, a monthly publication for those interested in ham radio county hunting, with an orientation toward CW operation. Contributions of articles, stories, letters, and pictures to the editor are welcomed, and may be included in future issues at the editor’s discretion. The County Hunter News will provide you with interesting, thought provoking articles, articles of county hunting history, or about county hunters or events, ham radio or electronics history, general ham radio interest, and provide news of upcoming operating events. We hope you will enjoy the County Hunter News. Feel free to forward, or provide links. Permission is given for copying or quoting in part or all provided credit is given to the CHNews and to the author of article. CW County Hunter Nets run on 14.0565, 10.122.5, and 7056.5, with activity occasionally on 3556.5 KHz. Also, there is SSB activity now is on ‘friendly net’ 7188 KHz. The CW folks are now pioneering 17M operation on 18.0915. (21.0565, 24.9155, and 28.0565 when sunspots better). Look around 18136 or for occasional 17M SSB runs usually after the run on 20M SSB. (21.336 and 28.336) You can see live spots of county hunter activity at ch.W6RK.com For information on county hunting, check out the following resources: The USACA award is sponsored by CQ Magazine. Rules and information are here: http://countyhunter.com/cq.htm For general information FAQ on County Hunting, check out: http://countyhunter.com/whatis.htm MARAC sponsors an award program for many other county hunting awards.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2016 Trailmarker.Indd
    ,6&+ 482 $3 2 7( ,5 5 $ % ' TRAILMARK ER 8 ,5 / 2 & 1 ' $,1 Adirondack Mountain Club Iroquois Chapter Est 1972 $&. 817 02 May 2016 Mt. Marcy, from Gray Peak Photo credit, Ed Kobos Our annual open house had a slow but steady stream The host chapter would need to secure lodging accommo- of members and non-members stopping by to visit and/or dations, develop an outing schedule, plan a dinner as well check out the various displays. I would like to recognize the as an informal get together for arriving guests. Should any- following presenters who had displays: Greg Smith, Carl An- one have an expertise with such endeavors and would like to derson, Norm Landis, Dave and Carol White, Bill and Mary show case your managing skills, please let me know ASAP Coffin, Carol Reese, Jay O’Hern, and Stephanie Graudons, in order to get the ball rolling. who is the young member coordinator for the ADK orga- As most of you are aware, the ADK has three “fun- nization. Thank you all. I also would like to acknowledge filled” weekends that need labor volunteers: JBL, Heart and thank Carol White and Allison Gaffney who contacted Lake and National Trails day, whose location will be at newspapers for advertisement, as well as Wendy and Brian Heart Lake. In exchange for a day of labor, generally a Sat- Sanders who provided the refreshments. urday, you get to camp free, or in the case at JBL, stay in It has been suggested that for the next year open house the lodge.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. 1 © 2008 Unistar Nuclear Services, LLC
    ER: Section 2.5 Socioeconomics 2.5 SOCIOECONOMICS This section describes the socioeconomic characteristics of the areas that could potentially be impacted by the construction and operation of Nine Mile Point Unit 3 Nuclear Power Plant (NMP3NPP). This section contains four subsections: 1) Demography, 2) Community Characteristics, 3) Historic Properties, and 4) Environmental Justice. These sections include a discussion of the socioeconomic characteristics of the 50 mi (80 km) comparative geographic area and the two-county region of influence (ROI) that includes Oswego County and Onondaga County, which are the primary areas of concern for the socioeconomic impact assessment. In addition, socioeconomic characteristics are also described for the 10 mi (16 km) emergency planning zone and the 4 mi (6.4 km) low population zone (LPZ), which are consistent with NUREG-1555 (NRC, 1999). The 50 mi (80 km) comparative geographic area was established by using the NMP3NPP site as the center point and drawing a 50 mi (80 km) radius circle around the NMP3NPP site. This comparative geographic area is consistent with NUREG-1555 (NRC, 1999), as a basis for conducting the socioeconomic analyses and evaluating the potential radiological and accident impacts. The ROI for the socioeconomic analyses includes Oswego County and Onondaga County, New York. The borders of these counties generally extend less than 30 mi (48 km) from the NMP3NPP site. These adjacent counties are located in the northern portion of the State of New York adjacent to Lake Ontario. Potential socioeconomic impacts, if any, arising from the proposed plant are likely to be confined to these two counties because a majority of the existing workforce for Nine Mile Point (NMP) Unit 1 and Unit 2 reside in these counties and it is assumed that the potential in-migrating construction and operational work forces for NMP3NPP are most likely to reside in this same two-county ROI.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Technology Upgrade and Conducting Accessibility Assessments at 400 State‐Operated Recreation Sites Inclusive Recreation Resource Center December 2013 to November 2015 PROJECT SUMMARY Since its inception in 2007, the Inclusive Recreation Resource Center has actively promoted and helped sustain inclusive recreation for ALL people. Through the development of the Inclusivity Assessment Tool, the day‐long Inclusion U training, and the ever‐ growing online recreation database, the IRRC has been instrumental in helping all people play wherever they choose. This project focused on making the IRRC’s work even more accessible to even more people with even more relevant recreation data. How? Through the migration of the Inclusion U training to an online format, Inclusion U Online The redesign of the website The redesign of the online recreation database to a more streamlined and mobile platform The streamlining of the Inclusivity Assessment Tool (IAT) to allow data to be entered into the database more efficiently and by more people The development of an app for mobile use The development of a trail assessment checklist Working with two partners, NYS DEC and NYS OPRHP to assessing state‐administered recreation sites throughout the state of New York Our project rolled out according to plans. This report shares the outcomes of this work and future steps. 2 OUTCOMES Inclusion U Online Target Outcome: 1 Inclusion U Online Actual Outcome: 1 Inclusion U Online Inclusion U Online is a 9‐module training that can be completed in 10 hours. Working with Gorges, Inc., based in Ithaca, NY, we developed and implemented a learning management system that is responsive in design, allowing users to complete the training on any device.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Waters 2010 (Pdf)
    July 2010 Testing the Waters A Guide to Water Quality at Vacation Beaches TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT Authors Mark Dorfman Kirsten Sinclair Rosselot Project Design and Development David Beckman Natural Resources Defense Council Jon Devine Natural Resources Defense Council Michelle Mehta Natural Resources Defense Council About NRDC The Natural Resources Defense Council is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Montana, and Beijing. Visit us at www.nrdc.org. Acknowledgments NRDC wishes to acknowledge the support of The Morris & Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, The Campbell Foundation, Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation, Crown Family Philanthropies, Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, Inc., Bernard F. and Alva B. Gimbel Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, The McKnight Foundation, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, The Pisces Foundation, The Prospect Hill Foundation, Resources Legacy Fund Foundation, Sandler Foundation, Mary Jean Smeal Clean Water Fund, and The Summit Fund of Washington. NRDC would like to thank Henry Henderson, Josh Mogerman, and Mariya Stepanenko for researching and reviewing various aspects of the report this year and Carol James for distributing the report nation wide. Thank you to Alexandra Kennaugh for managing the production of the report, to Bonnie Greenfield for designing it, and to Kathryn McGrath, Will Tam, and Auden Shim for creating a dynamic presentation of the report on the NRDC website. We would also like to thank Ynes Cabral and Linda Escalante for their skillful Spanish translations and Grace Murray and Elise Marton for their proofreading assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Erie and Lake Ontario Identified Advance
    LAKE ERIE AND LAKE ONTARIO IDENTIFIED ADVANCE MEASURES LOCATIONS County City/Town Street Address Property Ownership WWTP and pumps Chautauqua Dunkirk stations, Wright Park Public Dr. Wright Beach Park Chautauqua Dunkirk Public Road State Route 5 at Chautauqua Sheridan Public Eagle Bay WWTP, Central Chautauqua Silver Creek Public Avenue Chautauqua Silver Creek Central Avenue Public st Chautauqua Westfield Harbor Marina, 1 Public Street Chautauqua Hanover Exchange Street Public Lake Shore Drive Chautauqua Dunkirk Public West Erie Hamburg Lake Shore Road Public Erie Hamburg Route 5 Public Sturgeon Point Erie Evans Public Marina Niagara Porter Old Lake Road Private Niagara Porter Lake Road Private Niagara Porter Weeks Circle Private Niagara Wilson E. Lake Road Private Niagara Wilson WWTP, Ontario St. Public Niagara Newfane E. Lake Road Private Niagara Newfane Krull County Park Public Niagara Newfane Olcott Beach Park Private Niagara Newfane West Bluff Road Private/Public Niagara Somerset Lake View Drive Private Niagara Somerset Somerset Drive Private Golden Hill State Niagara Somerset Public Park Orleans Yates Smythe Lane Private Orleans Yates Petrie Lane Private Orleans Yates Pratt Lane Private Orleans Yates Peters Lane Private Orleans Yates Sunnycrest Lane Private Orleans Yates Lake Forest Road Private Oak Orchard On The Orleans Carlton Private Lake Orleans Carlton Knapp Shores Private W Brighton Cliffe Orleans Carlton Private Drive Orleans Kendall Lomond Shores Private Orleans Kendall Banner Beach Private Orleans Kendall Sunset Parkway
    [Show full text]