University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review 5-1-1993 Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.: A "Material Alteration" Nathalie L. Hiemstra Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umeslr Part of the Entertainment and Sports Law Commons Recommended Citation Nathalie L. Hiemstra, Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.: A "Material Alteration", 10 U. Miami Ent. & Sports L. Rev. 283 (1993) Available at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umeslr/vol10/iss1/11 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review by an authorized administrator of Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Hiemstra: <em>Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.</em>: A "Material Alterat MASSON v. NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC.: A "MATERIAL ALTERATION" I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 283 II. H ISTORY OF LIBEL LAW ................................................. 284 III. MASSON v. NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC ................................... 288 IV. EFFECT OF THE MASsON DECISION ON LIBEL LAW ........................... 295 V . C ONCLUSION ....................................................... .... 300 I. INTRODUCTION To the average reader, a statement surrounded by quotation marks represents a statement directly asserted by the speaker. A reader will give far more weight to such a statement than to an author's rendition or paraphrase. A direct quotation makes an even greater impression when it is found in a book about the speaker himself and his relationship with others. Quotes attributed to the speaker in such a book, which are not actually what the speaker said, may send a different message than what the speaker meant to convey.