DOCSLIB.ORG

Petrobras Securities Litigation Demand for Jury Trial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Petrobras Securities Litigation Demand for Jury Trial Case 1:14-cv-09662-JSR Document 342 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 223 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 14-cv-9662 (JSR) IN RE: PETROBRAS SECURITIES LITIGATION DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CONSOLIDATED FOURTH AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case 1:14-cv-09662-JSR Document 342 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 223 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........................................................................................ 1 II. NATUREOF THE ACTION ............................................................................................. 7 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ......................................................................................... 9 IV. OVERVIEW OF THE EXCHANGE ACT VIOLATIONS ............................................. 10 A. The Exchange Act Parties ..................................................................................... 10 1. Lead Plaintiff .................................................................................................. 10 2. The Company .................................................................................................. 10 3. The Individual Defendants ............................................................................. 11 4. PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes ........................................ 14 V. FACTS RELEVANT TO EXCHANGE ACT CLAIMS.................................................. 15 A. The Skewed Bidding Process ................................................................................ 15 B. Bribery Schemes ................................................................................................... 24 C. The Refineries Scams ........................................................................................... 31 D. Additional Allegations of Scienter Concerning The Individual Defendants ........ 38 E. The Scheme Rendered the Company’s Financial Statements Materially False and Misleading............................................................................................................. 54 F. The Patently Inadequate Write-Off—From “Operation Car Wash” To Whitewash ............................................................................................................................... 58 G. PwC’s Purposeful Blind Eye to the Fraud ............................................................ 67 VI. OVERVIEW OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE EXCHANGE ACT DEFENDANTS ........ 78 VII DEFENDANTS’ FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS ................................... 84 A. False and Misleading Statements Made in 2010................................................... 84 B. False and Misleading Statements Made in 2011................................................... 89 C. False and Misleading Statements Made in 2012................................................... 93 D. False and Misleading Statements Made in 2013................................................. 100 E. False and Misleading Statements Made in 2014................................................. 109 F. False and Misleading Statements Made in 2015................................................. 119 G. Reasons Why Statements Made in 2010-2015 Were False and Misleading ...... 121 VIII. ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS RELATED TO THE SCHEME ............................... 125 IX. RELIANCE: FRAUD ON THE MARKET DOCTRINE .............................................. 160 X. LOSSCAUSATION ....................................................................................................... 162 XI. INAPPLICABILITY OF STATUTORY SAFE HARBOR ........................................... 163 i Case 1:14-cv-09662-JSR Document 342 Filed 11/30/15 Page 3 of 223 XII CLAIMS FOR RELIEF UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT........................................... 163 COUNTI ........................................................................................................................ 163 For Violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) Against the ExchangeAct Defendants ............................................................................................... 163 COUNTII ....................................................................................................................... 164 For Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act Against the Individual Defendants ......................................................................................................................................... 164 XIII. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT .......................................... 165 A. Introduction.........................................................................................................165 B. Background.........................................................................................................167 C. Relevant Securities Offerings ............................................................................. 171 1. May 15, 2013 Note Offerings ....................................................................... 171 2. March 10, 2014 Note Offerings .................................................................... 172 D. Securities Act Plaintiffs ...................................................................................... 176 E. Securities Act Defendants ................................................................................... 183 1. Issuer Defendants .......................................................................................... 183 2. Officer Defendants ........................................................................................ 185 3. Director Defendants ...................................................................................... 185 4. Underwriter Defendants ................................................................................ 186 5. Auditor Defendant ........................................................................................ 188 6. Relevant Non-Defendant Individuals ........................................................... 189 F. Jurisdiction and Venue ........................................................................................ 190 G. False and Misleading Statements ........................................................................ 191 1. 2011 20-F ...................................................................................................... 191 2. 8/10/12 6-K ................................................................................................... 192 3. 2012 20-F ...................................................................................................... 193 4. 4/30/13 6-K ................................................................................................... 194 5. 2/26/14 6-K ................................................................................................... 195 6. 3/7/14 6-K ..................................................................................................... 196 7. 3/11/14 6-K ................................................................................................... 196 H. Petrobras’ Financial Statements Failed to Comply With PCAOB Standards And SECRegulations ................................................................................................. 197 COUNTIII ...................................................................................................................... 209 ii Case 1:14-cv-09662-JSR Document 342 Filed 11/30/15 Page 4 of 223 For Violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act Against the Securities Act Defendants ......................................................................................................................................... 209 COUNTIV...................................................................................................................... 212 For Violations Of Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act Against Petrobras and PGF ... 212 COUNTV ....................................................................................................................... 214 For Violations of Section 15 of the Securities Act Against the Officer Defendants ...... 214 COUNTVI...................................................................................................................... 215 For Violations of Section 15 of the Securities Act Against Petrobras America Inc. ...... 215 XIV CLASS ALLEGATIONS FOR EXCHANGE ACT AND SECURITIES ACT COUNTS ......................................................................................................................................... 216 XV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF ................................................................................................. 218 XVI JURYDEMAND ............................................................................................................ 218 iii Case 1:14-cv-09662-JSR Document 342 Filed 11/30/15 Page 5 of 223 Lead Plaintiff Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited (“USS” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned counsel, alleges the following individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated. All allegations are made upon information and belief, except as to those allegations concerning Plaintiff, which are alleged upon personal knowledge. Plaintiff’s allegations are based upon the investigation of Plaintiff’s counsel, which included a review of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings by Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. — Petrobras (“Petrobras” or the “Company”) and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petrobras Oil Scandal Leaves Brazilians Lamenting a Lost Dream
    https://nyti.ms/1SY8Z2P INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS Petrobras Oil Scandal Leaves Brazilians Lamenting a Lost Dream By DAVID SEGAL AUG. 7, 2015 Alberto Youssef, a convicted money launderer and former bon vivant, sat in a Brazilian jail cell in March of last year, getting ready to tell his lawyers a story. It was about an elaborate bribery scheme involving Petrobras, the government-controlled oil giant. He opened with a dire prediction. “Guys,” Mr. Youssef said, “if I speak, the republic is going to fall.” To those lawyers, Tracy Reinaldet and Adriano Bretas, who recently recounted the conversation, this sounded a tad melodramatic. But then Mr. Youssef took a piece of paper and started writing the names of participants in what would soon become known as the Petrobras scandal. Mr. Reinaldet looked at the names and asked, not for the last time that day, “Are you serious?” “We were shocked,” he recalled, sitting in a conference room in his law office in downtown Curitiba, the capital of the southern state of Paraná, one morning in June. “It was kind of like, in Brazil, we know that corruption is a monster. But we never really see the monster. This was like seeing the monster.” What Mr. Youssef described to his lawyers, and then to prosecutors after he signed a plea agreement last year, is a fraud that has destabilized the country’s political system, helped tilt the economy into recession and left thousands unemployed. It has all but devastated Brazil’s status as an up-and-comer on the world stage. The Petrobras scandal would read as pure tragedy were it not filled with a cast of Hollywood-ready characters and their lavish props.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Protestos E O Impeachment De Dilma Rousseff
    Lusotopie 17 (2018) 112-135 brill.com/luso Entre as ruas e as instituições: os protestos e o impeachment de Dilma Rousseff Luciana Tatagiba Professora Livre-Docente do Departamento de Ciência Política, da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp). Coordenadora do Núcleo de Pesquisa em Participação, Movimentos Sociais e Ação Coletiva, NEPAC/ UNICAMP Rua Mata Atlântica, 180, Bosque de Barão Geraldo, Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil, 13082-755 [email protected] Resumo O artigo analisa a campanha pelo impeachment de Dilma Rousseff, buscando com- preender as condições para a emergência e sucesso dos protestos de direita. Como foi possível que organizações desconhecidas tivessem êxito em mobilizar uma base social sem tradição de protestos, em um cenário de confronto político até então domi- nado pela esquerda? O artigo propõe que a resposta está na forma como se combinou política institucional e mobilização social nessa conjuntura, a partir da laboriosa con- strução do antipetismo, ou mesmo do ódio ao PT. Palavras-chave protestos – direita – confronto político – antipetismo © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi:10.1163/17683084-12341714Downloaded from Brill.com02/20/2019 07:24:44PM via communal account Entre as ruas e as instituições 113 Entre les rues et les institutions : Les protestations et la campagne de destituion de Dilma Rousseff Résumé L’article analyse la campagne de destitution de Dilma Rousseff, cherchant à com- prendre les conditions pour l’émergence et le succès des manifestations de droite. Comment était-il possible que des organisations inconnues aient réussi à mobi- liser une base sociale qui n’avait pas tradition de protestation, dans un scénario de confrontation politique jusqu’alors dominé par la gauche ? La réponse proposée par l’article réside dans la manière dont la politique institutionnelle et la mobilisation so- ciale ont été combinées dans cette conjoncture, à partir de la construction laborieuse de l’antipétisme, ou de la haine envers le PT.
    [Show full text]
  • Key 2017 Developments in Latin American Anti-Corruption Enforcement
    March 15, 2018 KEY 2017 DEVELOPMENTS IN LATIN AMERICAN ANTI-CORRUPTION ENFORCEMENT To Our Clients and Friends: In 2017, several Latin American countries stepped up enforcement and legislative efforts to address corruption in the region. Enforcement activity regarding alleged bribery schemes involving construction conglomerate Odebrecht rippled across Latin America's business and political environments during the year, with allegations stemming from Brazil's ongoing Operation Car Wash investigation leading to prosecutions in neighboring countries. Simultaneously, governments in Latin America have made efforts to strengthen legislative regimes to combat corruption, including expanding liability provisions targeting foreign companies and private individuals. This update focuses on five Latin American countries (Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Peru) that have ramped up anti-corruption enforcement or passed legislation expanding anti-corruption legal regimes.[1] New laws in the region, coupled with potentially renewed prosecutorial vigor to enforce them, make it imperative for companies operating in Latin America to have robust compliance programs, as well as vigilance regarding enforcement trends impacting their industries. 1. Mexico Notable Enforcement Actions and Investigations In 2017, Petróleos Mexicanos ("Pemex") disclosed that Mexico's Ministry of the Public Function (SFP) initiated eight administrative sanctions proceedings in connection with contract irregularities involving Odebrecht affiliates.[2] The inquiries stem from a 2016 Odebrecht deferred prosecution agreement ("DPA") with the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ").[3] According to the DPA, Odebrecht made corrupt payments totaling $10.5 million USD to Mexican government officials between 2010 and 2014 to secure public contracts.[4] In September 2017, Mexico's SFP released a statement noting the agency had identified $119 million pesos (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Alert Latin America Anti-Bribery Year-In-Review: 2019 Developments and Predictions for 2020
    February 28, 2020 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Alert Latin America Anti-Bribery Year-in-Review: 2019 Developments and Predictions for 2020 By Tico Almeida, Lillian Howard Potter, and John F. Walsh1 I. INTRODUCTION Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement activity reached new heights in 2019. Corporate penalties paid to US enforcement agencies topped last year’s record levels, and individuals were charged at a pace matching last year’s near-record level.2 As discussed in detail below, Latin American citizens from Ecuador to Venezuela have recently found themselves facing criminal anti-corruption charges in federal courts in the US. These trends are critically important both to Latin American companies and to US companies doing business in Latin America. As recent enforcement trends show, foreign companies are a perennial target of US enforcement agencies. Nine of the top 10 all-time largest FCPA enforcement actions have been brought against companies based outside the US, including several Brazilian companies. Similarly, US companies with operations in Latin America have good reason to ensure that they have strong anti-corruption controls in place because, as discussed below, US enforcement agencies are investigating corruption by US companies operating across the region, from Mexico to Peru. This alert summarizes key Latin America 2019 anti-bribery enforcement developments and concludes with predictions for 2020. For a comprehensive global review of enforcement and policy developments, please refer to WilmerHale’s FCPA Alert: Global Anti-Bribery Year-in-Review for 2019. II. KEY INVESTIGATION-RELATED DEVELOPMENTS IN LATIN AMERICA A. Notable Features of 2019 Corporate Resolutions in Latin American Cases 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil's “Operation Car Wash”: the Latest Chapter
    Brazil’s “Operation Car Wash”: The Latest Chapter Kelly Kramer Bernardo Weaver Partner Partner + 1 202 263 3007 +55 11 2504 4604 [email protected] [email protected] September 20, 2016 Speakers Kelly Kramer Bernardo Weaver Washington, DC São Paulo (T&C) + 1 202 263 3007 +55 11 2504 4604 [email protected] [email protected] Topics for Discussion 1. Origins 2. Petrobras Scheme 3. Change/Expansion in Scope 4. Current Status of Key Political Figures 5. (Proposed) Changes in Legislation 6. Changes in Law Enforcement Techniques 7. Changes in Law Enforcement Behavior 8. Leniency Agreements? 9. The Future “Operation Car Wash” – Origins Money laundering Posto da Torre Brasília-DF Alberto Youssef Paulo Roberto Costa (Black market dollar operator) Former Supply Director of Petrobras “Operation Car Wash” – Scheme Political Nominations “Operation Car Wash” – Change/Expansion of Scope Petrobras (Corruption, cartel, Money Laundering / embezzlement of ??? Drug Dealing overpriced contracts (or ∞) and money laundering) Allegations: • Political slush funds • Unlawful funding of political campaigns (presidential campaigns) • Construction companies’ affairs in other countries are now under scrutiny (e.g., Peru) • Obstruction of justice • Other Government entities (e.g., Eletrobras, BNDES*, Pension Funds*) • 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympics “Operation Car Wash” – Main Characters: Allegations Lula – Criminal complaint filed by “Operation Car Wash” Taskforce Dilma Rousseff – Impeached but currently still eligible to hold office Eduardo Cunha
    [Show full text]
  • Vazajato Diálogos Inéditos: Concordamos Com Deltan
    22/06/2019 E-mail de - #VazaJato Diálogos inéditos: concordamos com Deltan Amanda Carvalho <[email protected]> #VazaJato Diálogos inéditos: concordamos com Deltan 3 mensagens The Intercept Brasil <[email protected]> 22 de junho de 2019 15:10 Responder a: us11­7ffbfdc654­[email protected] Para: [email protected] Sábado, 22 de junho de 2019 #VazaJato Diálogos inéditos: concordamos com Deltan Desde que o Intercept começou a publicar a série de reportagens demonstrando conduta irregular da força-tarefa da Lava Jato e do então juiz – agora ministro – Sergio Moro, os defensores da operação vêm adotando uma postura de criminalização do jornalismo, tendo o próprio ministro se referido ao Intercept como "site aliado a hackers criminosos". Essa tentativa de nos colar a criminosos foi denunciada por diversos grupos de defesa da liberdade de imprensa – como o Comitê para a Proteção dos Jornalistas, Repórteres sem Fronteiras e a Abraji –, que emitiram comunicados condenando a estratégia de Moro e das autoridades brasileiras de usar intimidação e ameaças para impedir a realização de nosso trabalho jornalístico. Hoje, nós decidimos publicar na nossa newsletter alguns trechos inéditos do arquivo da #VazaJato para mostrar como, antes de serem alvos de vazamentos, os procuradores da força-tarefa enfatizavam – em chats privados com seus colegas – que jornalistas têm o direito de publicar materiais obtidos por vias ilegais, e que a publicação desses materiais fortalece a democracia. Deltan Dallagnol, nominalmente o coordenador da força-tarefa, era com frequência o maior entusiasta dessas garantias. O apreço de Deltan pela liberdade de imprensa se deve, possivelmente, ao fato de que a Lava Jato se valeu, por anos, de vazamentos de trechos de delações premiadas e outros materiais confidenciais contidos nos autos das investigações como ferramenta de pressão contra políticos e empresários alvos da força-tarefa.
    [Show full text]
  • Relações Indecentes [Recurso Eletrônico] / Organização Camila Milek, Ana Júlia Ribeiro ; Coordenação Mírian Gonçalves
    Copyright© 2020 by Maria Hemília Fonseca Editor Responsável: Aline Gostinski Capa e Diagramação: Carla Botto de Barros Conselho Editorial Científico: Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Presidente da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. Investigador do Instituto de Investigações Jurídicas da UNAM - México Juarez Tavares Catedrático de Direito Penal da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Brasil Luis López Guerra Magistrado do Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos. Catedrático de Direito Constitucional da Universidade Carlos III de Madrid - Espanha Owen M. Fiss Catedrático Emérito de Teoria de Direito da Universidade de Yale - EUA TOMÁS S. VIVES ANTÓN Catedrático de Direito Penal da Universidade de Valência - Espanha CIP-BRASIL. CATALOGAÇÃO NA PUBLICAÇÃO SINDICATO NACIONAL DOS EDITORES DE LIVROS, RJ R321 Relações indecentes [recurso eletrônico] / organização Camila Milek, Ana Júlia Ribeiro ; coordenação Mírian Gonçalves ... [et al.] ; [ilustração] Eduardo Milek. - 1. ed. - São Paulo : Tirant Lo Blanch, 2020. recurso digital ; 1 MB Formato: epdf Requisitos do sistema: adobe acrobat reader Modo de acesso: world wide web ISBN 978-65-86093-89-6 (recurso eletrônico) 1. Poder judiciário e questões políticas - Brasil. 2. Investigação criminal - Brasil. 3. Corrupção na política - Brasil. 4. Lavagem de dinheiro - Brasil. 5. Brasil - Política e governo. 6. Livros eletrônicos. I. Milek, Camila. II. Ribeiro, Ana Júlia. III. Gonçalves, Mirian. IV. Milek, Eduardo. 20-64997 CDU: 343.35(81) Leandra Felix da Cruz Candido - Bibliotecária - CRB-7/6135 18/06/2020 24/06/2020 É proibida a reprodução total ou parcial, por qualquer meio ou processo, inclusive quanto às características gráficas e/ ou editoriais. A violação de direitos autorais constitui crime (Código Penal, art.184 e §§, Lei n° 10.695, de 01/07/2003), sujeitando-se à busca e apreensão e indenizações diversas (Lei n°9.610/98).
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY ADVISOR a WEEKLY PUBLICATION of the DIALOGUE September 16, 2016
    LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR ENERGY ADVISOR A WEEKLY PUBLICATION OF THE DIALOGUE www.thedialogue.org September 16, 2016 BOARD OF ADVISORS FEATURED Q&A TOP NEWS Mary Rose Brusewitz Partner, OIL & GAS Strasburger & Price Can Temer Boost Jeffrey Davidow Lula Charged Senior Counselor, in Petrobras The Cohen Group Brazil’s Struggling Graft Case Ramón Espinasa Consultant, Brazilian prosecutors on Inter-American Development Bank Energy Sector? Wednesday fi led charges against Luis Giusti former President Luiz Inácio Lula Senior Advisor, da Silva, his wife and six others Center for Strategic & in connection with the massive International Studies corruption scheme at state-run oil Jonathan C. Hamilton company Petrobras. Partner, Page 2 White & Case Raul Herrera Partner, POWER SECTOR Corporate & Securities Practice, Arnold & Porter IEnova Plans to James R. Jones Raise Over $1 Bn Chairman, ManattJones Global Strategies in Share Off ering Jorge Kamine Brazilian President Michel Temer has vowed to implement policies with the goal of attracting Mexican energy infrastructure Counsel, investment in the energy sector. // File Photo: Brazilian Government. company Infraestructura Energet- Skadden Arps ica Nova plans to raise more than Craig A. Kelly $1 billion in a secondary share of- Michel Temer was sworn in as Brazil’s president on Aug. Director, fering next month, which would be Americas Int’l Gov’t Relations, 31, replacing ousted President Dilma Rousseff. How will one of the biggest Mexican equity Exxon Mobil the change in government, which puts Temer in power
    [Show full text]
  • Handling Systemic Corruption in Brazil
    BRAZIL INSTITUTE A Conversation with Judge Sérgio Fernando Moro Handling Systemic Corruption in Brazil THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS, established by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a liv- ing national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mission is to commem- orate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan institution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publica- tions and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. Jane Harman, Director, President and CEO BOARD OF TRUSTEES Thomas R. Nides, Chairman Public members: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; John F. Kerry, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; G. Wayne Clough, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Arne Duncan, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education; David Ferriero, Archivist of the United States; Fred P. Hochberg, Chairman and President, Export-Import Bank; Carole Watson, Acting Chairman, National Endowment for the Humanities; Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Private Citizen Members: Timothy Broas, John T. Casteen III, Charles Cobb, Jr., Thelma Duggin, Carlos M.
    [Show full text]
  • Secret Brazil Archive Part 1
    How and Why The Intercept Is Reporting on a Vast Trove of Materials About Brazil’s Operation Car Wash and Justice Minister Sergio Moro Glenn Greenwald, Leandro Demori, Betsy Reed June 9 2019, 3:57 p.m. Secret Brazil Archive Part 1 A massive archive of previously undisclosed materials reveals systematic wrongdoing among powerful officials — and the public has a right to know. The Intercept Brasil today published three explosive exposés showing highly controversial, politicized, and legally dubious internal discussions and secret actions by the Operation Car Wash anti-corruption task force of prosecutors, led by the chief prosecutor Deltan Dallagnol, along with then-Judge Sergio Moro, now the powerful and internationally celebrated justice minister for Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. These stories are based on a massive archive of previously undisclosed materials — including private chats, audio recordings, videos, photos, court proceedings, and other documentation — provided to us by an anonymous source. They reveal serious wrongdoing, unethical behavior, and systematic deceit about which the public, both in Brazil and internationally, has the right to know. Read Our Complete CoverageSecret Brazil Archive These three articles were published today in The Intercept Brasil in Portuguese, and we have synthesized them into two English-language articles for The Intercept. Given the size and global influence of Brazil under the new Bolsonaro government, these stories are of great significance to an international audience. This is merely the beginning of what we intend to be an ongoing journalistic investigation, using this massive archive of material, into the Car Wash corruption probe; Moro’s actions when he was a judge and those of the prosecutor Dallagnol; and the conduct of numerous individuals who continue to wield great political and economic power both inside Brazil and in other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Capture in the Petrobras Corruption Scandal: the Sad Tale of an Oil Giant
    87 Political Capture in the Petrobras Corruption Scandal: The Sad Tale of an Oil Giant Monica Arruda de Almeida and Bruce Zagaris In academic debates about the government’s role in the economy, Petrobras used to be known as the darling exception to the overwhelming empirical evidence against state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Such corpora- tions are notorious for their lack of efficiency, vulnerability to political abuse, and draining of state revenue. However, since March 2014, Brazilians have been inundated with revelations of Petrobras-linked corruption that are considered unprecedented, even for a country so accustomed to corrup- tion scandals. Until this point, experts in Brazilian politics considered Petrobras one of the few successful cases of bureaucratic insulation against political exploitation. However, the company’s corruption investigation has cast doubt on the capacity of SOEs to insulate themselves from politicians, who see these companies as their hens with golden eggs. For Brazilians, the Petrobras case has also led to the realization that kickbacks and other bribery practices are not just likely, but the norm, in business deals in Brazil. Dubbed “Operação Lava Jato” (or the “Car Wash Investigation”) Brazil’s federal police officially launched its investigation on March 17, 2014, after being tipped off by analysts from the Council for Control of Financial Activities (COAF), the country’s financial intelligence unit. The analysts noticed frequent bank account transactions involving large sums Monica Arruda de Almeida is Adjunct Professor at the Center for Latin American Studies (CLAS) at Georgetown University. Her research focuses on international financial crime, with an emphasis on anti-money laundering efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Car Wash Operation: Petrobras Case Issue : Vol
    Transnational Dispute Management www.transnational-dispute-management.com ISSN : 1875-4120 Brazilian Car Wash Operation: Petrobras Case Issue : Vol. 17, Issue 6 by M.L. Labate Mantovanini Pádua Lima and Published : October 2020 P.C. Goldschmidt This paper is part of the special issue on “State-controlled Entities” prepared by: About TDM C. Bondy Prof. J. Chaisse Dr. H. Chen TDM (Transnational Dispute Management): Focusing on recent View profile View profile View profile developments in the area of Investment arbitration and Dispute Management, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting. Visit www.transnational-dispute-management.com Dr. J. Górski D. Sejko R. Weeramantry for full Terms & Conditions and subscription rates. View profile View profile View profile Open to all to read and to contribute TDM has become the hub of a global professional and academic network. Therefore we invite all those with an interest in Terms & Conditions Investment arbitration and Dispute Management to contribute. We are looking mainly for short comments on recent Registered TDM users are authorised to download and developments of broad interest. We would like where possible for print one copy of the articles in the TDM Website for personal, non-commercial use provided all printouts such comments to be backed-up by provision of in-depth notes clearly include the name of the author and of TDM. The and articles (which we will be published in our 'knowledge bank') work so downloaded must not be modified. Copies and primary legal and regulatory materials. downloaded must not be further circulated. Each individual wishing to download a copy must first register with the website.
    [Show full text]