DOCSLIB.ORG

Research to Develop and Manage the Sea Urchin Fisheries of NSW and Eastern Victoria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research to Develop and Manage the Sea Urchin Fisheries of NSW and Eastern Victoria Research to develop and manage the sea urchin fisheries of NSW and eastern Victoria D.G. Worthington and C.Blount Cronulla Fisheries Centre, P.O. Box 21, Cronulla, NSW, 2230 Australia FRDC Project No. 1999/128 October 2003 NSW Fisheries Final Report Series No. 56 ISSN 1440-3544 Research to develop and manage the sea urchin fisheries of NSW and eastern Victoria D.G. Worthington and C.Blount Cronulla Fisheries Centre, P.O. Box 21, Cronulla, NSW, 2230 Australia FRDC Project No. 1999/128 October 2003 NSW Fisheries Final Report Series No. 56 ISSN 1440-3544 Research to develop and manage the sea urchin fisheries of NSW and eastern Victoria October 2003 Authors: D.G. Worthington and C.Blount Published By: NSW Fisheries Postal Address: PO Box 21, Cronulla NSW 2230 Internet: www.fisheries.nsw.gov.au NSW Fisheries This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. DISCLAIMER Every attempt has been made to provide accurate information in this document. However, no liability attaches to NSW Fisheries or to any organisation or individual concerned with the supply of information or the preparation of this document for any consequences of using the information contained in this document. ISSN 1440-3544 Contents i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................................ III LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................................... IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... VI NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY...............................................................................................................VII 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background.................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Need ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Objectives..................................................................................................................................... 2 2. DEVELOPMENT OF METHODS TO ASSESS STOCKS OF SEA URCHIN IN NSW AND EASTERN VICTORIA ..... 3 2.1. General introduction.................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Assessment of stocks of red sea urchins in NSW.......................................................................... 4 2.2.1. Introduction...........................................................................................................................................4 2.2.2. Methods.................................................................................................................................................4 2.2.2.1. Commercial catch ..........................................................................................................................4 2.2.2.2. Density and biomass ......................................................................................................................5 2.2.2.3. Depletion caused by fishing...........................................................................................................6 2.2.3. Results...................................................................................................................................................6 2.2.3.1. Commercial catch ..........................................................................................................................6 2.2.3.2. Density and biomass ......................................................................................................................9 2.2.3.3. Depletion caused by fishing.........................................................................................................11 2.2.4. Discussion ...........................................................................................................................................13 2.3. Assessment of stocks of purple sea urchins in NSW................................................................... 14 2.3.1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................14 2.3.2. Methods...............................................................................................................................................14 2.3.3. Results.................................................................................................................................................16 2.3.4. Discussion ...........................................................................................................................................21 2.4. Assessment of stocks of sea urchins in Port Phillip Bay and eastern Victoria .......................... 23 2.4.1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................23 2.4.2. Methods...............................................................................................................................................23 2.4.2.1. Port Phillip Bay............................................................................................................................23 2.4.2.2. Eastern Victoria ...........................................................................................................................25 2.4.2.3. Habitat area and biomass .............................................................................................................25 2.4.3. Results.................................................................................................................................................26 2.4.3.1. Port Phillip Bay............................................................................................................................26 2.4.3.2. Eastern Victoria ...........................................................................................................................30 2.4.4. Discussion ...........................................................................................................................................35 3. DEVELOPMENT OF METHODS TO ENHANCE THE ROE OF SEA URCHINS.................................................. 37 3.1. General introduction.................................................................................................................. 37 3.2. Enhancing the roe of the purple sea urchin by reducing density ............................................... 38 3.2.1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................38 3.2.2. Methods...............................................................................................................................................38 3.2.2.1. Experimental design and sites sampled........................................................................................38 Small-scale .................................................................................................................................................38 Medium-scale.............................................................................................................................................39 Large-scale .................................................................................................................................................39 3.2.2.2. Effects of density on sea urchins..................................................................................................39 Small-scale .................................................................................................................................................39 Medium-scale.............................................................................................................................................39 Large-scale .................................................................................................................................................41 3.2.2.3. Effects of density on benthic assemblages...................................................................................41 3.2.3. Results.................................................................................................................................................42 Sea urchin fisheries of NSW and eastern Victoria, Blount & Worthington FRDC Project No. 99/128 ii Contents 3.2.3.1. Effects of density on sea urchins..................................................................................................42 3.2.3.2. Effects of density on benthic assemblages ...................................................................................48
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regime Shifts in the Anthropocene: Drivers, Risk, and Resilience
    Supplementary Information for Regime Shifts in the Anthropocene: drivers, risk, and resilience by Juan-Carlos Rocha, Garry D. Peterson & Reinette O. Biggs. This document presents a worked example of a regime shift. We first provide a synthesis of the regime shift dynamics and a causal loop diagram (CLD). We then compare the resulting CLD with other regime shifts to make explicit the role of direct and indirect drivers. For each regime shift analyses in this study we did a similar literature synthesis and CLD which are available in the regime shift database. A longer version of this working example and CLDs can be found at www.regimeshifts.org. 1. Kelps transitions Summary. Kelp forests are marine coastal ecosystems located in shallow areas where large macroalgae ecologically engineer the environment to produce a coastal marine environmental substantially different from the same area without kelp. Kelp forests can undergo a regime shift to turf-forming algae or urchin barrens. These shift leads to loss of habitat and ecological complexity. Shifts to turf algae are related to nutrient input, while shifts to urchin barrens are related to trophic-level changes. The consequent loss of habitat complexity may affect commercially important fisheries. Managerial options include restoring biodiversity and installing wastewater treatment plants in coastal zones. Kelps are marine coastal ecosystems dominated by macroalgae typically found in temperate areas. This group of species form submarine forests with three or four layers, which provides different habitats to a variety of species. These forests maintain important industries like lobster and rockfish fisheries, the chemical industry with products to be used in e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Konar, B., and J.A. Estes. 2003. the Stability of Boundary Regions
    Ecology, 84(1), 2003, pp. 174±185 q 2003 by the Ecological Society of America THE STABILITY OF BOUNDARY REGIONS BETWEEN KELP BEDS AND DEFORESTED AREAS BRENDA KONAR1,2 AND JAMES A. ESTES1 1U.S. Geological Survey and Department of Biology, A-316 Earth and Marine Sciences Building, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064 USA Abstract. Two distinct organizational states of kelp forest communities, foliose algal assemblages and deforested barren areas, typically display sharp discontinuities. Mecha- nisms responsible for maintaining these state differences were studied by manipulating various features of their boundary regions. Urchins in the barren areas had signi®cantly smaller gonads than those in adjacent kelp stands, implying that food was a limiting resource for urchins in the barrens. The abundance of drift algae and living foliose algae varied abruptly across the boundary between kelp beds and barren areas. These observations raise the question of why urchins from barrens do not invade kelp stands to improve their ®tness. By manipulating kelp and urchin densities at boundary regions and within kelp beds, we tested the hypothesis that kelp stands inhibit invasion of urchins. Urchins that were ex- perimentally added to kelp beds persisted and reduced kelp abundance until winter storms either swept the urchins away or caused them to seek refuge within crevices. Urchins invaded kelp bed margins when foliose algae were removed but were prevented from doing so when kelps were replaced with physical models. The sweeping motion of kelps over the sea¯oor apparently inhibits urchins from crossing the boundary between kelp stands and barren areas, thus maintaining these alternate stable states.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Extent of Urchin Barrens on the East Coast of Northland, New Zealand
    Estimated extent of urchin barrens on the east coast of Northland, New Zealand Vince Kerr and Roger Grace, October 2017 1 Estimated extent of urchin barrens on the east coast of Northland, New Zealand Vince Kerr and Roger Grace, October 2017 Cover Photo: An example of the urchin barren condition taken just south of the Cape Rodney to Okakari Point (Leigh) Marine Reserve at Cape Rodney, showing the greyish bare rock appearance of the urchin barren contrasted with the dark appearance in the aerial view of the algal forests. These photos also demonstrate the typical zonation of macroalgal forests and urchin barrens found in fished areas in northern New Zealand. Photo credit: Nick Shears Keywords: urchin barrens, marine habitat mapping, habitat classification, algal forest health, algal forest restoration, wave exposure, marine reserves, partially protected areas, Northland Citation: Kerr, V.C., Grace, R.V., 2017. Estimated extent of urchin barrens on shallow reefs of Northland’s east coast. A report prepared for Motiti Rohe Moana Trust. Kerr & Associates, Whangarei. Contact the authors: Vince Kerr, Kerr & Associates Phone +64 9 4351518, email: [email protected] Kerr & Associates web site 2 Contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Client brief ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Background
    [Show full text]
  • POTENTIAL IMPACTS of KELP FOREST HABITAT RESTORATION ALONG the PALOS VERDES PENINSULA Jeremy T
    POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF KELP FOREST HABITAT RESTORATION ALONG THE PALOS VERDES PENINSULA Jeremy T. Claisse1, Jonathan P. Williams1, Laurel A. Zahn1, Daniel J. Pondella1 & Tom Ford2 1 Vantuna Research Group, Department of Biology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041 2 The Bay Foundation, Los Angeles, CA 90045 Urchin barrens and kelp forest habitat Urchin barrens effect the invertebrate, kelp, benthic cover and fish communities restoration We sampled 25 sites in both 2012 and High densities of the unfished purple 2013 (Fig. 1) using a standardized Kelp Community giant kelp urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) comprehensive community monitoring southern result in ‘‘urchin barrens’’ largely survey protocol (for details see Hamilton et sea palm devoid of macroalgae across 61 ha of al. 2010 PNAS 107:18272-18277 and Claisse et rocky reef along the Palos Verdes al. 2012 PLoS ONE 7:e30290). Sites included Peninsula in southern California (Fig. 1; established kelp forests (green), extent of mapped urchin barrens shown urchin barrens (red) and those adjacent to urchin barrens (grey). We only in red). The study presented here is used data from the 5 m depth zone where most barrens occur. Species- focused on evaluating the potential specific site means were calculated by pooling data over both years. For effects of kelp forest habitat restoration fishes, estimated lengths were converted to weights using length-weight Fig. 4. nMDS plot of the kelp community using square by comparing the differences between relationships. root transformed density and a Bray-Curtis similarity ©Tom Boyd Images 2013 urchin barren and kelp forest habitats. matrix. Significant differences were found among site • We found significant community level differences among site categories (R adonis PERMANOVA: F2,16=8.5, categories in nMDS plots (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Kelp (Nereocystic Lutkeana) Restoration and Management in Northern California
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-14-2020 Bull Kelp (Nereocystic lutkeana) Restoration and Management in Northern California Olivia Johnson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Marine Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Olivia, "Bull Kelp (Nereocystic lutkeana) Restoration and Management in Northern California" (2020). Master's Projects and Capstones. 1035. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/1035 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This Master’s Project Bull Kelp (Nereocystic lutkeana) Restoration and Management in Northern California by Olivia Johnson is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco May 10, 2020 Submitted: Received: 5/10/2020 ________________________ Olivia Johnson Date Aviva Rossi Date Table of Contents 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..…….1 1.1. Objectives…..…………………………………………………………………………4 1.2. Background…..…………………………………………………………………..……4 1.2.1. Ecology and Geographic Distribution of Global Kelp Forests 1.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Divers of Oregon Proposal for Kelp Forest Preservation in Rocky Subtidal Zones of the Oregon Coast
    Initial Proposal Period Oregon Rocky Habitat Management Strategy FORMAL LETTER to O.P.A.C. Recreational Divers of Oregon Proposal for Kelp Forest Preservation in Rocky Subtidal Zones of the Oregon Coast @NBCNEWS: “With a loss of kelp forests, you're going to have a very, very profound impact on an ecosystem,” said Tristin McHugh, Reef Check California’s North coast regional manager. “It's like losing your redwoods. What would happen if you saw 90 percent of your redwoods drop dead right now?” For McHugh and many others, the biggest problem is awareness. Most people don’t even realize what sort of a catastrophe is happening below the sea surface. “This is the fight of our generation,” she said. “If we can't set ourselves up right now, there's going to be nothing for our kids further down the line." Initial Proposal Period Purple sea urchins predating the last kelp on this reef- completing an ‘urchin barren’ Special Note: In case the matching Proposal submitted 12/31/20 on the SeaSketch website may not meet some Rocky Shores’ Proposal screening criteria, (the ideas herein are really meant for most of the subtidal sites of the Oregon Coast) - we are also submitting this via email as a FORMAL LETTER to OPAC and the Rocky Shores Working Group. Pg. 37 Oregon Territorial Sea Plan: Part Three “Where the desired outcome cannot be met with a site designation proposal, members of the public and interested entities should outline their concern or desired regulatory change in a formal letter to the Ocean Policy Advisory Council.” Contact Information Please fill out the following section with primary contact information for this proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Recurrent Destructive Grazing of Successionally Immature Kelp Forests by Green Sea Urchins in Vestfjorden, Northern Norway
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 123: 95-106, 1995 Published July 20 Mar Ecol Prog Ser I LI P P Recurrent destructive grazing of successionally immature kelp forests by green sea urchins in Vestfjorden, Northern Norway Nils T. Hagen Department of Fisheries and Natural Science. Bode College. N-8002 Bode, Norway ABSTRACT: Outbreak populations of the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis Miiller caused widespread decimation of the original Laminaria hyperborea (Gunn.) Fosl. kelp forest in Vest- florden, Northern Norway, during the early 1980s. In the follow~ngdecade, some of the resulting urch~n-dominatedbarren grounds reverted to kelp forest, which, after persisting for more than 5 yr, began to be eliminated yet again. Age analysis of annual growth rings in kelp stipes from field sites at V~rayIsland inlcate that the time of initial kelp recovery varied from site to site but took place between 1984 and 1987. The earliest independent observations of localized macrophyte recovery were made in 1984 at the Harbour Pier site, where, by August 1992, the new kelp forest had already been eliminated by recurrent destructive grazing. Sea urchin density inside re-established kelp forests at 3 other sites on Vaer~yIsland was 45 to 75 ind. m-2 in 1992. These urchin populations had significantly aggregated spatial patterns, and recurrent destructive grazing appeared to be mrmnent. This predic- tion was verified in 1993 when barren grounds reappeared at all study sltes. The threshold conditions for initiation of destructive grazing have been approximated by a curve in the aggregation-density plane. Sea urchins in the Vestfjorden area are infected by the recently discovered epizootic endopara- sitic nematode Echinornermella matsi.
    [Show full text]
  • This Study Used Long-Term Records of Kelp Forests, Environmental Variables, and Biological Factors, to Document a Shift in a Temperate Coastal Ecosystem
    Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author): This study used long-term records of kelp forests, environmental variables, and biological factors, to document a shift in a temperate coastal ecosystem. They show that temperature events, namely MHWs drove the substrantial loss of kelp forests along N California, following the ‘Blob’. Yet, unlike previous events, where kelp recovered, increased sea urchins densities prevented kelps from restablishing, and the system remained collapsed, with the lowest consecutive measures of kelp abundance over the last 34 years occurring since 2015. The manuscript represents a comprehensive assessment of a climate driven transition on a temperate reef, and explores key mechanisms preventing recovery. The dataset and analyses are well presented, the finding novel, and the results should influence how we understand the stability of ecosystem state shifts. I have some questions regarding the interpretation of some of these findings. Including the coupling of nutrients and temperature, and some questions about the sea urchin data. I also found that the broader consequence of this study, specifically the ‘implementation strategies for how this can be used to develop innovative management techniques for restoration and monitoring’ are not as well presented as they could be nor supported by the manuscript. Yet these are relatively minor comments. On the whole this is a strong addition to the subject matter and will add much to our current understanding of these dynamics. Comments by line. Line 28. I have some questions regarding the statement of temperature-nutrient dynamics as a key extreme event. Although I agree that temperature and nutrients are intrinsically linked in the northern California upwelling system, I am not convinced that they are always linked in coastal ecosystems, and that these variables can be coupled in this way when discussing global trends.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Predators and Habitat on Sea Urchin Density and Behavior in Southern California Kelp Forests
    UC San Diego Research Theses and Dissertations Title The Effects of Predators and Habitat on Sea Urchin Density and Behavior in Southern California Kelp Forests Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3zv9w2w2 Author Nichols, Kathryn D. Publication Date 2009 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE EFFECTS OF PREDATORS AND HABITAT ON SEA URCHIN DENSITY AND BEHAVIOR IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA KELP FORESTS _______________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of San Diego State University _______________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Biology _______________ by Kathryn D. Nichols Spring 2009 SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY The Undersigned Faculty Committee Approves the Thesis of Kathryn D. Nichols: The Effects of Predators and Habitat on Sea Urchin Density and Behavior in Southern California Kelp Forests _____________________________________________ Kevin Hovel, Chair Department of Biology _____________________________________________ Matt Edwards Department of Biology _____________________________________________ Kathleen Farley Department of Geography ______________________________ Approval Date iii Copyright © 2009 by Kathryn D. Nichols All Rights Reserved iv DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to my family. Particularly my parents who have always supported my every endeavor with encouragement, excitement and a belief in me that is unwavering. v Curiosity is the one thing invincible in nature. –Freya Stark vi ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS The Effects of Predators and Habitat on Sea Urchin Density and Behavior in Southern California Kelp Forests by Kathryn D. Nichols Master of Science in Biology San Diego State University, 2009 It is well documented that sea urchins can have vast impacts on kelp forest community structure as a result of kelp grazing.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Outbreak in a Keystone Grazer Population Brings Hope to the Recovery of Macroalgal Forests in a Barren Dominated Island
    fmars-08-645578 June 7, 2021 Time: 12:13 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 08 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.645578 Disease Outbreak in a Keystone Grazer Population Brings Hope to the Recovery of Macroalgal Forests in a Barren Dominated Island Francesca Gizzi1*†, João Gama Monteiro1*†, Rodrigo Silva1, Susanne Schäfer1,2, Nuno Castro1,3, Silvia Almeida1, Sahar Chebaane1, Alejandro Bernal-Ibáñez1, Filipe Henriques1, Ignacio Gestoso1,4 and João Canning-Clode1,4 1 MARE–Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), Funchal, Portugal, 2 GEOMAR, Marine Ecology Department, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Edited by: Kiel, Germany, 3 MARE–Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Charitha Bandula Pattiaratchi, Lisbon, Portugal, 4 Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, United States University of Western Australia, Australia Reviewed by: Macroalgal forests play a key role in shallow temperate rocky reefs worldwide, Yining Chen, supporting communities with high productivity and providing several ecosystem Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, China services. Sea urchin grazing has been increasingly influencing spatial and temporal Nuno Vaz Álvaro, variation in algae distributions and it has become the main cause for the loss of Instituto de Investigação e Tecnologia da Agronomia e Meio Ambiente these habitats in many coastal areas, causing a phase shift from macroalgae habitats (IITAA), Portugal to barren grounds. The low productive barrens often establish as alternative stable *Correspondence: states and only a major reduction in sea urchin density can trigger the recovery of Francesca Gizzi macroalgal forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Urchin Barrens As Alternative Stable States of Collapsed Kelp Ecosystems
    Vol. 495: 1–25, 2014 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published January 9 doi: 10.3354/meps10573 Mar Ecol Prog Ser FREEREE ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE: REVIEW Sea urchin barrens as alternative stable states of collapsed kelp ecosystems Karen Filbee-Dexter*, Robert E. Scheibling Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada ABSTRACT: Sea urchin barrens are benthic commu- nities on rocky subtidal reefs that are dominated by urchins and coralline algae; in the absence of intense herbivory by urchins, these barrens support luxuri- ant seaweed communities such as kelp beds (or forests). Barrens can extend over 1000s of km of coastline or occur in small patches (10s to 100s of m) within a kelp bed. They are characterized by low primary productivity and low food-web complexity relative to kelp communities and are generally con- sidered a collapsed state of the kelp ecosystem. To assess the stability of sea urchin barrens and poten- tial for return to a kelp-dominated state, we docu- ment temporal and spatial patterns of occurrence of barrens along temperate and polar coasts. We exam- Sea urchins Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis graze along ine the various drivers of phase (or regime) shifts in the edge of a kelp bed, creating a barren. these areas, the threshold levels of urchin abundance that trigger abrupt changes in ecosystem state, and Photo: Robert Scheibling the feedback mechanisms that stabilize each state. Although longitudinal (decadal) studies are limited, we find evidence in several regions that transitions between barrens and kelp beds are characterized by discontinuous phase shifts, with different thresholds INTRODUCTION for forward (to barrens) and reverse (to kelp beds) shifts, in accordance with alternative stable-state Sea urchin barrens are benthic communities that dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Recruitment Facilitation Can Drive Alternative States on Temperate Reefs
    Ecology, 91(6), 2010, pp. 1763–1773 Ó 2010 by the Ecological Society of America Recruitment facilitation can drive alternative states on temperate reefs 1,4 2,3 MARISSA L. BASKETT AND ANNE K. SALOMON 1Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California–Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616 USA 2Marine Science Institute, University of California–Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA 3School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6 Canada Abstract. How the combination of positive and negative species interactions acts to drive community dynamics is a fundamental question in ecology. Here we explore one aspect of this question by expanding the theory of predator-mediated coexistence to include the potential role of facilitation between the predator and inferior competitor. To motivate and illustrate our simple model, we focus on sea-urchin–algae interactions in temperate rocky reef systems and incorporate recruitment facilitation, a common characteristic of marine systems. Specifically, the model represents sea urchin grazing on macroalgae, macroalgal competition with crustose coralline algae (CCA), and facilitation of sea urchin recruitment to CCA. These interactions generate alternative stable states, one dominated by macroalgae and the other by urchins, which do not occur when recruitment facilitation of urchins to CCA is ignored. Therefore, recruitment facilitation provides a possible mechanism for alternative kelp forest and urchin barren states in temperate marine systems, where storm events or harvesting of urchins or their predators can drive switches between states that are difficult to reverse. In systems with such dynamics, spatial management such as no-take marine reserves may play a crucial role in protecting community structure by increasing the resilience to shifts between states.
    [Show full text]