DOCSLIB.ORG

Role of the Transcription Factors Hic1, Myca and the Basement Membrane in the Zebrafish Pronephros Regeneration After Laser Induced Injury

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Role of the Transcription Factors Hic1, Myca and the Basement Membrane in the Zebrafish Pronephros Regeneration After Laser Induced Injury AUS DEM DEPARTMENT INNERE MEDIZIN KLINIK FÜR INNERE MEDIZIN IV: NEPHROLOGIE UND ALLGEMEINMEDIZIN DES UNIVERSITÄTSKLINIKUMS FREIBURG IM BREISGAU Role of the transcription factors hic1, myca and the basement membrane in the zebrafish pronephros regeneration after laser induced injury Inaugural-D issertation zur Erlangung des Medizinischen Doktorgrades der Medizinischen Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs -Universität Freiburg im Breisgau Vorgelegt 2016 von Anne Wurditsch, geb. Bunjes geboren in Herrenberg Dekan: Prof. Dr. Norbert Südkamp Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. med. Gerd Walz Zweiter Gutachter: PD Dr. med. Ekkehart Lausch Jahr der Promotion: 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................. VI 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. KIDNEY DEVELOPMENT: PRONEPHROS, MESONEPHROS, METANEPHROS ...................................................................... 1 1.2. ZEBRAFISH AS A MODEL ORGANISM ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. ZEBRAFISH PRONEPHROS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4. COLLECTIVE CELL MIGRATION ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.5. COLLECTIVE CELL MIGRATION (CCM) IN THE ZEBRAFISH PRONEPHROS ........................................................................ 10 1.6. ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY ....................................................................................................................................... 11 1.7 KIDNEY RECOVERY AFTER LASER INDUCED INJURY IN ZEBRAFISH (A MODEL FOR AKI) ..................................................... 13 1.8 THE CRISPR/CAS9 SYSTEM............................................................................................................................... 16 1.9 THE TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS HIC1 AND MYCA ...................................................................................................... 21 1.10 AIMS OF THIS WORK ......................................................................................................................................... 23 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS ........................................................................................................................... 24 2.1. MATERIALS AND SOLUTIONS .............................................................................................................................. 24 2.2. HOUSING AND MATING CONDITIONS OF ADULT ZEBRAFISH ....................................................................................... 33 2.3 EMBRYO COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................ 34 2.4 ZEBRAFISH EMBRYO INJECTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 34 2.5. ZEBRAFISH LINES ............................................................................................................................................. 34 2.6 LYSIS OF ZEBRAFISH EMBRYOS OR AFTER FIN CLIPPING ............................................................................................. 36 2.7 POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION .......................................................................................................................... 36 2.8 RESTRICTION ENZYME DIGEST ............................................................................................................................ 37 2.9 CLONING AND LIGATION ................................................................................................................................... 38 2.10 TRANSFORMATION ........................................................................................................................................... 38 2.11 IN VITRO TRANSCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 39 2.12 LITHIUM CHLORIDE PRECIPITATION ...................................................................................................................... 39 2.13 MINICULTURE AND –PREPARATION ..................................................................................................................... 39 2.14 PLASMID PREPARATION (MIDI) .......................................................................................................................... 40 2.15 PHENOL-CHLOROFORM EXTRACTION ................................................................................................................... 40 2.16 AGAROSE-GEL ELECTROPHORESIS ....................................................................................................................... 41 2.17 DNA SEQUENCING .......................................................................................................................................... 41 2.18 WHOLE-MOUNT IMMUNOSTAINING .................................................................................................................... 41 2.19 LASER ABLATION ............................................................................................................................................. 42 2.20 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................................... 43 3. RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 44 3.1. HIC1 (SA10158) DOES NOT IMPAIR PRONEPHRIC REGENERATION AFTER LASER INDUCED INJURY ...................................... 44 3.2. CRISPR/CAS9 HIC1......................................................................................................................................... 47 3.3. CRISPR/CAS9 MYCA ....................................................................................................................................... 54 3.4. SHROOM1 KNOCKOUT DOES NOT IMPAIR PRONEPHRIC REPAIR AFTER LASER ABLATION ................................................... 58 3.5. SHROOM3 IS NOT REQUIRED FOR PRONEPHRIC REPAIR AFTER LASER INDUCED INJURY ..................................................... 59 3.6. THE PRONEPHRIC BASEMENT MEMBRANE IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE REPAIR PROCESS .................................................. 63 4. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................................. 69 iii 5. GERMAN SUMMARY / ZUSAMMENFASSUNG .............................................................................................. 73 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 74 7. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................. 75 8. APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................................... 82 8.1 ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 82 8.2 TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................. 84 8.3 FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................................ 85 8.4 EIDESSTATTLICHE VERSICHERUNG………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….86 8.5 ERKLÄRUNG ZUM EIGENANTEIL DER DISSERTATIONSSCHRIFT………………………………………………………………………………………..87 8.6 PUBLIKATIONEN…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………88 iv v ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Acute kidney injury (AKI) with the possible progression to chronic kidney disease is still a worldwide public health challenge. Although spontaneous recovery might take place, AKI is generally associated with poor outcome, since many of the affected patients remain dialysis- dependent. Therefore, the need for understanding the underlying pathophysiology and the regeneration process remains urgent. The laser-mediated ablation of collectively migrating tubular epithelial cells of the zebrafish pronephros represents a unique AKI model. In this system, transient injuries of the kidney tubule are repaired within hours via collective cell migration (CCM) of the neighbouring tubular epithelium. Here, I further characterize the molecular factors that connect CCM to tissue repair. Previous work has implicated the transcription factors hypermethylated in cancer 1 (hic1), myca in the regeneration process. Furthermore, the basement membrane is considered to be essential guiding matrix for the regenerating renal epithelia. My results show that the pronephros regeneration is not affected in genetic loss-of-function models of hic1 or its putative targets shroom1 and shroom3. Since
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watsonjn2018.Pdf (1.780Mb)
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Edmond, Oklahoma Department of Biology Investigating Differential Gene Expression in vivo of Cardiac Birth Defects in an Avian Model of Maternal Phenylketonuria A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOLOGY By Jamie N. Watson Edmond, OK June 5, 2018 J. Watson/Dr. Nikki Seagraves ii J. Watson/Dr. Nikki Seagraves Acknowledgements It is difficult to articulate the amount of gratitude I have for the support and encouragement I have received throughout my master’s thesis. Many people have added value and support to my life during this time. I am thankful for the education, experience, and friendships I have gained at the University of Central Oklahoma. First, I would like to thank Dr. Nikki Seagraves for her mentorship and friendship. I lucked out when I met her. I have enjoyed working on this project and I am very thankful for her support. I would like thank Thomas Crane for his support and patience throughout my master’s degree. I would like to thank Dr. Shannon Conley for her continued mentorship and support. I would like to thank Liz Bullen and Dr. Eric Howard for their training and help on this project. I would like to thank Kristy Meyer for her friendship and help throughout graduate school. I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Robert Brennan and Dr. Lilian Chooback for their advisement on this project. Also, I would like to thank the biology faculty and staff. I would like to thank the Seagraves lab members: Jailene Canales, Kayley Pate, Mckayla Muse, Grace Thetford, Kody Harvey, Jordan Guffey, and Kayle Patatanian for their hard work and support.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of KRAS Mutant Cell Lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of KRAS mutant cell lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K. Durand2,5, Kirsten L. Bryant2, Tikvah K. Hayes2, Sen Peng3, Nhan L. Tran4, Gerald C. Gooden1, David N. Buckley1, Channing J. Der2, Albert S. Baldwin2 ✉ & Bodour Salhia1 ✉ Oncogenic RAS mutations are associated with DNA methylation changes that alter gene expression to drive cancer. Recent studies suggest that DNA methylation changes may be stochastic in nature, while other groups propose distinct signaling pathways responsible for aberrant methylation. Better understanding of DNA methylation events associated with oncogenic KRAS expression could enhance therapeutic approaches. Here we analyzed the basal CpG methylation of 11 KRAS-mutant and dependent pancreatic cancer cell lines and observed strikingly similar methylation patterns. KRAS knockdown resulted in unique methylation changes with limited overlap between each cell line. In KRAS-mutant Pa16C pancreatic cancer cells, while KRAS knockdown resulted in over 8,000 diferentially methylated (DM) CpGs, treatment with the ERK1/2-selective inhibitor SCH772984 showed less than 40 DM CpGs, suggesting that ERK is not a broadly active driver of KRAS-associated DNA methylation. KRAS G12V overexpression in an isogenic lung model reveals >50,600 DM CpGs compared to non-transformed controls. In lung and pancreatic cells, gene ontology analyses of DM promoters show an enrichment for genes involved in diferentiation and development. Taken all together, KRAS-mediated DNA methylation are stochastic and independent of canonical downstream efector signaling. These epigenetically altered genes associated with KRAS expression could represent potential therapeutic targets in KRAS-driven cancer. Activating KRAS mutations can be found in nearly 25 percent of all cancers1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Methylation Ms 162021Cleanba
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.04.283655; this version posted January 6, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Genome Methylation Predicts Age and Longevity of Bats Gerald S. Wilkinson1*†, Danielle M. Adams1, Amin Haghani2, Ake T. Lu2, Joseph Zoller3, Charles E. Breeze4, Bryan D. Arnold5, Hope C. Ball6, Gerald Carter7, Lisa Noelle Cooper6, Dina K.N. Dechmann8,9,10, Paolo Devanna11, Nicolas J. Fasel12, Alexander V. Galazyuk6, Linus Günther13, Edward Hurme1,9, Gareth Jones14, Mirjam Knörnschild10,13, Ella Z. Lattenkamp11,15, Caesar Z. Li3, Frieder Mayer13, Josephine A. Reinhardt16, Rodrigo A. Medellin17, Martina Nagy13, Brian Pope18, Megan L. Power19, Roger D. Ransome14, Emma C. Teeling19, Sonja C. Vernes11,20,21, Daniel Zamora-Mejías17, Joshua Zhang2, and Steve Horvath2,3*† 1 Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park 20742 USA 2 Department of Human GenetiCs, David Geffen School of MediCine, University of California, Los Angeles 90095 USA 3 Department of BiostatistiCs, Fielding School of PubliC Health, University of California, Los Angeles 90095 USA 4 Altius Institute for BiomediCal Sciences, Seattle, WA, 98121 USA 5 Department of Biology, Illinois College, Jacksonville, IL 62650 USA 6 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio MediCal University, Rootstown, Ohio, U.S.A. 44272-0095 7 Department of Evolution, ECology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University,
    [Show full text]
  • The Tumor Suppressor HHEX Inhibits Axon Growth When Prematurely Expressed in Developing Central Nervous System Neurons
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by epublications@Marquette Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Biological Sciences Faculty Research and Biological Sciences, Department of Publications 9-1-2015 The umorT Suppressor HHEX Inhibits Axon Growth when Prematurely Expressed in Developing Central Nervous System Neurons Matthew .T Simpson Marquette University Ishwariya Venkatesh Marquette University Ben L. Callif Marquette University Laura K. Thiel Marquette University Denise M. Coley Marquette University See next page for additional authors Accepted version. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, Vol 68 )September 2015): 272-283. DOI. © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Used with permission. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, Vol 68 )September 2015): 272-283. DOI. Authors Matthew T. Simpson, Ishwariya Venkatesh, Ben L. Callif, Laura K. Thiel, Denise M. Coley, Kristen N. Winsor, Zimei Wang, Audra A. Kramer, Jessica K. Lerch, and Murray G. Blackmore This article is available at e-Publications@Marquette: https://epublications.marquette.edu/bio_fac/515 NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; this is the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation at the bottom of the page. The Tumor Suppressor HHEX Inhibits Axon Growth When Prematurely Expressed in Developing Central Nervous System Neurons Matthew T.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcription Factor and Lncrna Regulatory Networks Identify Key Elements in Lung Adenocarcinoma
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Transcription Factor and lncRNA Regulatory Networks Identify Key Elements in Lung Adenocarcinoma Dan Li 1, William Yang 2, Jialing Zhang 3, Jack Y. Yang 1, Renchu Guan 1 and Mary Qu Yang 1,* 1 Joint Bioinformatics Graduate Program, Department of Information Science, George W. Donaghey College of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 2801 S. University Ave, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA; [email protected] (D.L.); [email protected] (J.Y.Y.); [email protected] (R.G.) 2 School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-501-683-2035 Received: 19 September 2017; Accepted: 21 December 2017; Published: 5 January 2018 Abstract: Lung cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed carcinoma and is the leading cause of cancer death. Although significant progress has been made towards its understanding and treatment, unraveling the complexities of lung cancer is still hampered by a lack of comprehensive knowledge on the mechanisms underlying the disease. High-throughput and multidimensional genomic data have shed new light on cancer biology. In this study, we developed a network-based approach integrating somatic mutations, the transcriptome, DNA methylation, and protein-DNA interactions to reveal the key regulators in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). By combining Bayesian network analysis with tissue-specific transcription factor (TF) and targeted gene interactions, we inferred 15 disease-related core regulatory networks in co-expression gene modules associated with LUAD.
    [Show full text]
  • Myc and Mnt in Transcriptional Regulation and Chromatin Dynamics
    Institutionen för Mikrobiologi, Tumör och Cellbiologi MYC AND MNT IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION AND CHROMATIN DYNAMICS AKADEMISK AVHANDLING som för avläggande av medicine doktorsexamen vid Karolinska Institutet offentligen försvaras i Petrén, Nobels väg 12B Fredagen den 21 februari, 2014, kl. 9.30 av Therese Wahlström Huvudhandledare: Fakultetsopponent: Professor Marie Arsenian Henriksson Professor Michael D. Cole Karolinska Institutet Dartmouth Medical School Institutionen för Mikrobiologi, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Tumör och Cellbiologi Betygsnämnd: Bihandledare: Professor Ann-Kristin Östlund Farrants Docent Sergey Belikov Stockholms Universitet Karolinska Institutet Institutionen för molekylär biovetenskap, Institutionen för Cell och Wenner-Grens Institut Molekylärbiologi Professor Anthony Wright Karolinska Institutet Institutionen för Laboratoriemedicin Professor Galina Selivanova Karolinska Institutet Institutionen för Mikrobiologi, Tumör och Cellbiologi Stockholm 2014 From the Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden MYC AND MNT IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION AND CHROMATIN DYNAMICS Therese Wahlström Stockholm 2014 All previously published papers were reproduced with permission from the publisher. Published by Karolinska Institutet. Printed by åtta.45 Tryckeri AB. © Therese Wahlström, 2014 ISBN 978-91-7549-377-0 TO MY FAMILY ABSTRACT The MYC proto-oncogene regulates several cellular processes including cell cycle progression, proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Retinoic Acid Rewires the Adrenergic Core Regulatory Circuitry of Neuroblastoma but Can Be Subverted by Enhancer Hijacking of MY
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218834; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Retinoic acid rewires the adrenergic core regulatory circuitry of neuroblastoma but can be subverted by enhancer hijacking of MYC or MYCN Mark W. Zimmerman1†, Adam D. Durbin1, Shuning He1, Felix Oppel1, Hui Shi1, Ting Tao1, Zhaodong Li1, Alla Berezovskaya1, Yu Liu2, Jinghui Zhang2, Richard A. Young3,4, Brian J. Abraham2, A. Thomas Look1† 1 Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215 2 Department of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105 3 Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA, 02142 4 Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02142 †Email: [email protected] (M.W.Z.) and [email protected] (A.T.L.) Keywords: Neuroblastoma, transcription, retinoic acid, enhancer hijacking Running title: Retinoic acid rewires the core regulatory circuitry of neuroblastoma 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218834; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT Neuroblastoma cell identity depends on a core regulatory circuit (CRC) of transcription factors that collaborate with MYCN to drive the oncogenic gene expression program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamic Interplay Between Homeodomain Transcription Factors and Chromatin Environment Regulates Proneural Factor Outcomes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.02.398677; this version posted December 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Ang et al pg.1 THE DYNAMIC INTERPLAY BETWEEN HOMEODOMAIN TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS AND CHROMATIN ENVIRONMENT REGULATES PRONEURAL FACTOR OUTCOMES Cheen Euong Ang1,2,3, Victor Hipolito Olmos2,3, Bo Zhou2,3,4, Qian Yi Lee1,2,3, Rahul Sinha3, Aadit Narayanaswamy2,3, Moritz Mall2,3, Kirill Chesnov2,3, Thomas Sudhof4 and Marius Wernig2,3 1. Department of Bioengineering 2. Department of Pathology 3. Institute of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine 4. Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Correspondence to: [email protected] (M.W.) bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.02.398677; this version posted December 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Ang et al pg.2 SUMMARY Generation of neurons of vast diversity involves early spatial and temporal patterning of the neuronal precursors by morphogenic gradients and combinatorial expression of transcription factors. While the proneuronal function of the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor Ngn2 is well established, its role in neuronal subtype specification remains unclear. Here, we found that coexpressing NGN2 with the forebrain homeobox factor EMX1 converts human pluripotent stem cells into a highly homogeneous glutamatergic forebrain neurons without partial cholinergic and monoaminergic gene programs observed in cells infected with NGN2 only.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Figures S1-3, Tables S1-3
    Supplementary Material Supplementary Material and Methods MEFs preparation and electroporation Dissected embryos were washed in cold PBS, head and entrails (heart, liver) were excised and used for genotyping. The remaining embryonic tissues were sliced, incubated in Trypsin/EDTA solution (15 min at 37°C; Sigma), further dissociated and cultured in Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium [(IMDM); purchased from Sigma)] supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin/streptomycin (100 UI), 2 mM L-glutamine and 1× non-essential amino acids (all chemicals were from Gibco). Cells were electroporated in buffer (125 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 3 mM glucose, 25 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 1.2 mM MgCl2) supplemented with 0.66 % (w/v) ethylene glycol (PEG) 4000 in 4 mm gap cuvettes using an ECM 830 electroporator (BTX; settings: 240V, 30 ms). Luciferase assay and NF-kB pathway activation The luciferase assay was performed according to the supplier’s protocol using Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega). To activate the NF-ĸB pathway, cells were stimulated overnight with 20 ng/ml TNFα (stock 100 µg/ml; Peprotech), 20 ng/ml lymphotoxin (LTα; stock 10 µg/ml; Invivogen) or 100 ng/ml Pam3csk4 (stock 100 µg/ml, Invivogen). PCR primers used for ddPCR The first primer is in forward and the second primer in reverse orientation: β-ACTIN, 5’- CTAGGCGGACTATGAC-3’, 5’- GACTTGGGAGAGGACT-3’; SIRT1, 5’- CTCCAGGCAGATGCCATAAC-3’, 5’- TGCCCTTGGTTAAAATTTGG-3’; TLR2, 5’- CCTCCAATCAGGCTTCTCTG-3’, 5’- TGGAGGTTCACACACCTCTG-3’. Antibodies used for IHC and Western blotting IHC: anti-β-catenin (mouse monoclonal, EM-22, Exbio), anti-chromogranin A (rabbit polyclonal, ab15160, Abcam), anti-lysozyme (rabbit polyclonal, A0099, Dako), anti-p21 (mouse monoclonal, SXM30, BD Pharmingen), anti-p53 (rabbit polyclonal, NCL-p53-CM5p, Novocastra), anti-PCNA (rabbit polyclonal, ab18197, Abcam), anti-Tlr2 (goat polyclonal, sc-16237, Santa Cruz).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0269772 A1 Califano Et Al
    US 20090269772A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0269772 A1 Califano et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 29, 2009 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR Publication Classification IDENTIFYING COMBINATIONS OF (51) Int. Cl. COMPOUNDS OF THERAPEUTIC INTEREST CI2O I/68 (2006.01) CI2O 1/02 (2006.01) (76) Inventors: Andrea Califano, New York, NY G06N 5/02 (2006.01) (US); Riccardo Dalla-Favera, New (52) U.S. Cl. ........... 435/6: 435/29: 706/54; 707/E17.014 York, NY (US); Owen A. (57) ABSTRACT O'Connor, New York, NY (US) Systems, methods, and apparatus for searching for a combi nation of compounds of therapeutic interest are provided. Correspondence Address: Cell-based assays are performed, each cell-based assay JONES DAY exposing a different sample of cells to a different compound 222 EAST 41ST ST in a plurality of compounds. From the cell-based assays, a NEW YORK, NY 10017 (US) Subset of the tested compounds is selected. For each respec tive compound in the Subset, a molecular abundance profile from cells exposed to the respective compound is measured. (21) Appl. No.: 12/432,579 Targets of transcription factors and post-translational modu lators of transcription factor activity are inferred from the (22) Filed: Apr. 29, 2009 molecular abundance profile data using information theoretic measures. This data is used to construct an interaction net Related U.S. Application Data work. Variances in edges in the interaction network are used to determine the drug activity profile of compounds in the (60) Provisional application No. 61/048.875, filed on Apr.
    [Show full text]