Environmental Changes in the Southern Canadian Rockies from Multiple Tree-Ring Proxies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Changes in the Southern Canadian Rockies from Multiple Tree-Ring Proxies ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES IN THE SOUTHERN CANADIAN ROCKIES FROM MULTIPLE TREE-RING PROXIES Emma Watson1, Brian Luckman2, Greg Pederson3 and Rob Wilson4 1Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada 2Department of Geography, University of Western Ontario 3U.S. Geological Survey and Big Sky Institute, Montana State University 4School of Geosciences, Edinburgh University Peyto Glacier in 1966 taken by W.E.S. Henoch (NHRI - Canadian Glacier Information Centre). Introduction • study of glacier fluctuations had traditionally provided many of our ideas about the climate history of the last millennium in the Canadian Rockies • Paleoclimate signal in glacier records is complex, incomplete and biased to large events • we describe tree-ring based research of the late Holocene climate of the area • in particular we detail the development of continuous records of temperature, precipitation, glacier mass balance and streamflow from tree-ring chronologies sampled in different environments which can be compared with the glacial record Moraine dating is available from 66 glacier forefields PEYTO in the Canadian Rockies Luckman, 2000 Summary of Little Ice Age (LIA) glacier events in the Canadian Rockies Periods of advance: • 1150-1350 (advances through forest- calendar dated logs) • selected preservation of glacier record between 14th and 17th centuries • widespread advances early 18th and throughout 19th century May-August Maximum temperatures Columbia Icefield, Canadian Rockies 950-1995 Based on regional ringwidth and maximum tree-ring density chronologies Update to Luckman (1997) using: more chronologies from wider area (i.e. better replication and more regionally representative); different predictand (original Apr-Aug mean) and RCS standardization of MXD data • RCS on average cooler, shows more low frequency trend, 1690s most extreme cold period reconstructed Anomalies from 1901-1980 mean Comparison with northern Hemisphere temperature reconstructions Standardized to the 1000-1980 period. Tree ring chronologies and precipitation records Instrumental and estimated precipitation Smoothed annual precipitation reconstructions for the southern Canadian Cordillera Widespread wet periods Widespread dry periods Using tree-rings to study glacier mass balance • mass balance is a time series that represents the difference between accumulation and ablation on a glacier on an annual basis - mass balance records are short (~30 yrs) • because tree-ring chronologies are responsive to similar climate controls as those that influence mass balance, they may be useful for studying and reconstructing mass balance • Developing seasonal mass balance reconstructions can help us understand the climate parameters responsible for changes in glacier length (e.g. do the contributions of winter and summer balance vary back through time or during important intervals (e.g. the LIA max?) Peyto Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta Peyto Glacier in 1966 taken by W.E.S. Henoch (NHRI - Canadian Glacier Information Centre). Area estimates • Outlet glacier from Wapta Icefield 1887 17.15 km2 Peyto Glacier in 1966 taken by W.E.S. Henoch • contributes flow to the Mistaya River (NHRI - Canadian Glacier Information2 Centre). catchment and the North Saskatechewan 1966 13.5 km River Basin 1993 11.81 km2 • 34% decrease in Bw Impact of 1976 PDO shift on glacier mass balance in the Pacific Northwest Relationships between measured mass balance and instrumental climate (1966-1995) • meteorological data from stations in Banff, Jasper, Lake Louise, Golden, Carway, Valemont • agrees with other findings for continental glaciers (e.g. Yarnal, 1984) Winter balance (Bw) – October-April precip Summer balance (Bs) – June-Aug temps 500 450 Banff precipitation Banff temperature 17 400 C) ) 15 350 o m p ( m 300 m p ( i c 13 ug t e 250 A il pr un- pr 200 J A 11 n - t a 150 e Oc m 100 y = 0.1296x + 93.774 y = -0.0009x + 11.18 9 50 R = 0.70 R = -0.48 2 R2 = 0.49 R = 0.23 0 7 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 -3000 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000 -500 0 Bw (mwe) Bs (mwe) 350 18 Jasper precipitation Jasper temperature 17 300 16 C) ) 250 o m p ( m 15 m p ( t i 200 g c u e 14 A il pr 150 un- pr 13 J A n - t a 100 e Oc 12 m y = 4.8817x + 256.81 y = -0.0014x + 11.723 50 R = 0.65 R = -0.83 11 R2 = 0.42 R2 = 0.61 0 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 -3000 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000 -500 0 Bw (mwe) Bs (mwe) Reconstruction Strategy • goal = reconstruct seasonal and net mass balance from tree-ring chronologies • ablation related to SUMMER temperatures therefore use summer temperature reconstruction • winter accumulation more difficult because there are no winter-sensitive chronologies available for the area • winter climate in Alaska and the southern Canadian Cordillera are both influenced by conditions in the North Pacific Typical winter season climate anomalies during positive PDO years • therefore, use tree-ring chronologies from Alaska to study WINTER mass balance at Peyto Location and length of records used in the study Lat. N Long. W Elev. (m) Prov./State Length Monthly Climate Records Banff Precipitation1 51 11 115 34 1389 Alb. 1895-1995 Banff Temperature1 51 11 115 34 1389 Alb. 1895-2001 Jasper Precipitation1 52 53 118 04 1061 Alb. 1936-1995 Jasper Temperature2 52 53 118 04 1061 Alb. 1916-1994 Mass Balance Peyto3 51 41 116 32 2140-3180 Alb. 1966-1997 Tree-Ring Data Miners Well (MW)4 60 00 141 41 650 Alaska 1428-1995 Athabasca (ATHA)5 52 13 117 14 2000 Alb. 869-1994 Waterton (WA)6 49 28 113 34 1200 Alb. 1673-1996 6 Lytton (LY) 50 14 121 35 258 B.C. 1468-1996 Reconstructed versus measured mass balance at Peyto Glacier The predicted net mass balance series is the difference between the winter and summer series It is not a separate reconstruction. Mass balance reconstructions (1673-1994) for Peyto Glacier based on tree-ring data • 1966-1995 winter accumulation below long-term mean • 1966-1995 summer ablation is greater than the long-term mean • 1966-1995 net mass balance is well below the long-term mean • the LIA maximum at Peyto glacier is estimated between ca. 1836 and 1841 based on dating of killed and damaged trees along the western trimline (Luckman, 1996) mean balances 1673-1883 +70 mm w.e./yr. 1883-1993 -317 mm w.e./yr. • the decrease in Bn since the 1880s corresponds well with Wallace’s (1995) estimate that Peyto has lost 70% of its volume over the past 100 years Moving correlations between the seasonal and net mass balance series Correlations calculated using a 31-year window (plotted on central year). The dashed horizontal lines denote statistical significance (p<0.05). Correlations over the full period (1673-1994) are given in parenthesis beside each legend entry. • over the full period correlations are highest between Bn and Bs • Bn-Bw and Bn-Bs correlations are variable but always significant • Bw-Bs are not significantly correlated over the full period but correlate positively during the early 1700s and 1800s (higher accumulation and reduced ablation) and again near the end of the record (lower accumulation and greater ablation) The LIA moraine record for the Canadian Rockies and reconstructed mass balance at Peyto Glacier Dated moraines in the Canadian Rockies (66 glaciers, 25 year intervals Luckman 2000) • The reconstructed periods of positive mass balance during the early 18th, early and late 19th centuries immediately precede or coincide with regional periods of moraine development in the Canadian Rockies. •The correspondence between these totally independent proxy climate records provides strong mutual verification of the regional climate history. • some glaciers in the Premier range built small moraines in the 1970s (Luckman et al., 1997) Exploring relationships with Pacific SSTs • winter mass balance reconstruction filtered to yield time series of high (<8 years) and low (>8 years) frequency variability • Nov-Mar SSTs regressed on the mass-balance reconstructions (1870-1994) previous studies have associated changes in glacier mass balance with decadal-Interdecadal variability in the Pacific Ocean • the mass balance reconstructions allow relationships with SSTs to be explored over a much longer period than the short measured balance records (1966-present) permit Winter balance – high frequency Winter balance – low frequency ENSO-like pattern Resembles pattern of decadal-interdecadeal variability identified previously (e.g. Zhang et al. 1997) • Luckman (2000) noted that at the most northerly sites (Mount Robson area and Premier Ranges), most glaciers have 18th century moraines at their downvalley limits while few glaciers farther south formed moraines during this period (e.g. Kananaskis area) • only 19th century moraines have been identified in Waterton Lakes National Park and Glacier National Park, Montana 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 Mass Balance reconstructions in the Canadian and northern U.S. Rockies • How do recent mass balance reconstructions for Peyto Glacier and Glacier National Park, Montana compare? Does the timing of the LIA maximum coincide? Mass Balance reconstructions for Peyto Glacier and Glacier National Park (GNP) For a detailed comparison of these mass balance records please see the poster by G. Pederson, E. Watson, B. Luckman, D. Fagre, S. Gray and L. Graumlich titled: Tree-Ring Based Estimates of Glacier Mass Balance in the Northern Rocky Mountains for the Past 300 Years Exploring the controls of pre-instrumental streamflow How have changes in precipitation (winter and summer) and glacier wastage affected streamflow? Can this be addressed using tree-ring based reconstructions? Bow at Banff streamflow (1912-1996) • flows from Bow glacier in Wapta Icefield across the semi-arid Canadian Prairies • unregulated upstream Banff precipitation • precipitation-sensitive Douglas-fir chronologies exist and have been used to reconstruct annual (July-June precipitation) Peyto Glacier Mass balance • outlet glacier from Wapta Icefield • regionally representative • separate summer and winter balances available which represent summer melting Data used in this study and winter accumulation (i.e.
Recommended publications
  • Day Hiking Lake Louise, Castle Junction and Icefields Parkway Areas
    CASTLE JUNCTION AREA ICEFIELDS PARKWAY AREA LAKE LOUISE AREA PLAN AHEAD AND PREPARE Remember, you are responsible for your own safety. 1 7 14 Castle Lookout Bow Summit Lookout Wilcox Pass MORAINE LAKE AREA • Get advice from a Parks Canada Visitor Centre. Day Hiking 3.7 km one way; 520 m elevation gain; 3 to 4 hour round trip 2.9 km one way; 245 m elevation gain; 2.5 hour round trip 4 km one way; 335 m elevation gain; 3 to 3.5 hour round trip • Study trail descriptions and maps before starting. Trailhead: 5 km west of Castle Junction on the Bow Valley Parkway Trailhead: Highway 93 North, 40 km north of the Lake Louise junction, Trailhead: Highway 93 North, 47 km north of Saskatchewan Crossing, • Check the weather forecast and current trail conditions. (Highway 1A). at the Peyto Lake parking lot. or 3 km south of the Icefield Centre at the entrance to the Wilcox Creek Trailheads: drive 14 km from Lake Louise along the Moraine Lake Road. • Choose a trail suitable for the least experienced member in Lake Louise, Castle Junction campground in Jasper National Park. Consolation Lake Trailhead: start at the bridge near the Rockpile at your group. In the mid-20th century, Banff erected numerous fire towers From the highest point on the Icefields Parkway (2070 m), Moraine Lake. Pack adequate food, water, clothing, maps and gear. and Icefields Parkway Areas where spotters could detect flames from afar. The Castle Lookout hike beyond the Peyto Lake Viewpoint on the upper self-guided • Rise quickly above treeline to the expansive meadows of this All other trails: begin just beyond the Moraine Lake Lodge Carry a first aid kit and bear spray.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Townsite
    T HE G R E PHONE NUMBERS A T D YOHO area code (250) IV WAPTA ICEFIELD ID Amiskwi E EMERGENCY NUMBERS Pass YOHO GLACIER Gordon Ambulance 344-6226 Fire 343-6028 Des Poilus Kilometres0510 Miles R.C.M.Police 344-2221 Balfour Pass 0 5 WARDENS GLACIER (403) 762-4506 (24 hours) DES POILUS Yoho Balfour Peak OTHER NUMBERS to Jasper Yoho Information Centre 343-6783 Twin Falls Yoho National Park WAPUTIK Yoho Park Administration 343-6324 (see pages I Isolated Peak Laughing ICEFIELD C McArthur 20/21) E Falls F I Amiskwi E Daly L Yoho River River D le S Litt DALY P Niles Yoho Valley Road A GLACIER R K only open Mid-June W British A The President Takakkaw to Mid-October Y Kwetinook Pass Falls Columbia Alberta O EMERALD 5 t 4 Left-hand turns to GLACIER C Yoho Pass on the Trans-Canada Jasper re Highway are 93 ek Bosworth permitted at signed Banff Yoho Carnarvon Emerald Paget Peak intersections only. JASPER Kootenay Basin Sherbrooke Wapta Lake 1 NATIONAL Hamilton PARK Lake Ogden 2 Horsey Emerald 1A LAKE 6 LOUISE Lake Burgess Jasper Amiskwi River Field Wapta Ross to Town of Banff Pass APM Lake Lake Tocher Ridge Hamilton 3 (85 km from Falls 4 Field) and Spike Peak Narao Peak Kootenay National Emerald River Emerald 3 Park (see pages Burgess 24/25) 1 ? Stephen ALBERTA Cathedral O FIELD Cataract Brook tt er APM Lake O'Hara Fire Road BRITISH he ad BANFF R Victoria COLUMBIA i 5 Duchesnay Van Horne Range ve Abbot NATIONAL r Dennis Basin Pass PARK BANFF Duchesnay Lefroy Lake (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience the Icefields Parkway in Winter
    EXPLORE! LOOKING FOR ADVENTURE? MORE INFORMATION Winter transforms the Icefields Parkway, one of the world’s most scenic drives. Ancient glaciers glow JASPER INFORMATION CENTRE: 780-852-6176 winter white under blankets of fresh snow. Quiet descends, broken only by far off sounds of ice crevasses growling as LAKE LOUISE VISITOR CENTRE: 403-522-3833 they grow. Snow-covered trails entice drivers to pull over, don snowshoes and break trail below some of the highest VALLEY OF THE FIVE LAKES MODERATE – SNOWSHOES BANFF VISITOR CENTRE: 403-762-1550 mountains in the Canadian Rockies. EXPERIENCE THE 4.5 km loop/2 hrs; 66 m elevation gain/loss pc.gc.ca/jasper Trailhead: 9 km south of Jasper, 224 km north of pc.gc.ca/banff Lake Louise ICEFIELDS LOOKING FOR A QUICK AND WANT TO STRETCH Five small, picturesque lakes in a sunny valley are CHECK THE ROAD CONDITIONS AND THE WEATHER Athabasca Glacier PARKWAY SCENIC STOP? YOUR LEGS? the highlights of this outing, a local family favourite. FORECAST BEFORE YOU LEAVE TOWN: TANGLE FALLS NIGEL PASS ROAD CONDITIONS: Call 511 • alberta511.ca IN WINTER WANT TO STRAP ON MODERATE – SNOWSHOES OR BACKCOUNTRY SKIS Trailhead: 96 km south of Jasper, 137 km north of ATHABASCA FALLS WEATHER FORECAST 14 km/5-6 hrs return; 385 m elevation gain Lake Louise EASY – WEAR STURDY BOOTS SNOWSHOES OR SKIS? Banff 403-762-2088 • Jasper 780-852-3185 This beautiful, cascading icefall right beside the road 1 km/30 mins return; no elevation gain/loss Trailhead: 116 km south of Jasper, 117 km north of weather.gc.ca • Visit an information centre Trailhead: 30 km south of Jasper, 203 km north of makes for a great photo stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditioning: Why Go to the to Pack Light, Gym When You Just Pack Right Can Go Outdoors?
    WWW.MOUNTAINEERS.ORG MARCH/APRIL 2011 • VOLUME 105 • NO. 2 MountaineerE X P L O R E • L E A R N • C O N S E R V E Conditioning: Why go to the To pack light, gym when you just pack right can go outdoors? Take your spring skiing to British Columbia’s backcountry inside Mar/Apr 2011 » Volume 105 » Number 2 9 How to best lighten your pack Enriching the community by helping people explore, conserve, learn about, and enjoy the 11 Sailing? Mountaineers? lands and waters of the Pacific Northwest. A carload of climbers said, why not? 18 B.C.’s best for spring skiing 11 Heading north? Check these lodges and huts 21 Train outdoors to get ready Why go to the gym when you can go to the beach? 24 Doing the PCT piece by piece This Foothills course is all about logistics 6 reaching OUT Mountaineers with sea legs Connecting the community to the outdoors 7 conservation currents 18 News about conservation and recreational access 14 OUR fRIENdS Goings on in the broader outdoor community 16 GEAR grist Making the turn from downhill to backcountry skiing 17 stepping UP Help prepare Kitsap Cabin for Earth Day! Best of British Columbia’s backcountry 26 bookMARkS Tasty trail food you don’t need to pack 24 27 PLAyGROUNd A place for kids to solve the puzzles of nature 28 CLIff notes New column looks at what’s up in the alpine 37 GO GUIdE Trips, outings, events, courses, seminars Taking on Washington’s Pacific Crest Trail DISCOVER THE MOUntaINEERS If you are thinking of joining — or have joined and aren’t sure where to The Mountaineer uses .
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of CCRN Activities in Canada's National Parks
    Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Overview of CCRN Activities in Canada’s National Parks 4-10-2017 Contents Changing Cold Regions Network .................................................................................................................. 2 Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Resources ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Focused Research Projects ....................................................................................................................... 3 CCRN Research in Canada’s National Parks .............................................................................................. 5 Canadian Rockies Hydrological Observatory (CRHO) ................................................................................... 6 Jasper National Park ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Columbia Icefield/Athabasca Glacier ....................................................................................................... 7 Banff National Park .................................................................................................................................... 11 Peyto Glacier (Wapta Icefield) ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Vastness of Banff National Park
    Exploring the Vastness of Banff National Park By Claire Walter o borrow on old Ttravelogue cliché, Alberta’s Banff National Park is study in contrast. Its 2,586 square miles comprise both wilderness and civilization. There are high mountains, deep valleys, endless forests and abundant wildlife. Even though much of it feels and looks remote, it is just 70 miles from Calgary – and the Trans-Canada Highway runs right through it. It contains one large town (Banff), one smaller town (Lake Louise Village), two palatial hotels (the Fairmont Banff Springs and Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise) and three significant downhill ski areas (Ski Lake Louise, Sunshine and Norquay). It is a park among parks, with Kootenay National Park just to the south, Yoho National Park to the west (and in another province) and Jasper National Park to the north. It is Canada’s oldest national park and also the one with phenomenal snowshoe opportunities. It’s a great destination for a snowshoe getaway or a multi-activity winter vacation with snowshoeing among the options. There’s skiing (Alpine and Nordic), wildlife viewing, spa- hopping and enjoying the shops, galleries, restaurants and nightspots in Banff or quieter Lake 1 Go FartherTM Model: ARTICA™ BACKCOUNTRY q Two-Piece Articulating Frame q Virtual Pivot Traction Cam q Quick-Cinch™ One-Pull Binding q 80% Recyclable Materials, No PVC’s eastonmountainproducts.com ©2010 easton mountain products Louise Village. As a bonus, winter is low season in Banff, so lodging is a bargain and the shops offer incredible values. Snowshoeing Options The most straightforward snowshoeing is practically from the doorstep of the Chateau Lake Louise.
    [Show full text]
  • Ca 1978 ISSS Tours 8+16E Report.Pdf
    11th CONGRESS I NT ERNA TI ONAL I OF SOIL SCIENCE EDMONTON, CANADA JUNE 1978 GUIDEBOOK FOR A SOILS LAND USE TOUR IN BANFF AND JASPER NATIONAL PARKS TOURS 8 AND 16 L.J. KNAPIK Soils Division, Al Research Council, Edmonton G.M. COEN Research Branch, culture Canada, Edmonton Alberta Research Council Contribution Series 809 ture Canada Soil Research Institute tribution 654 Guidebook itors D.F. Acton and L.S. Crosson Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology Saskatoon, Saskatchewan ~-"-J'~',r--- --\' "' ~\>(\ '<:-q, ,v ~ *'I> co'"' ~ (/) ~ AlBERTA \._____ ) / ~or th '(<.\ ~ e r ...... e1Bowden QJ' - Q"' Olds• Y.T. I N.W.T. _...,_.. ' h./? 1 ...._~ ~ll"O"W I ,-,- B.C. / U.S.A. ' '-----"'/' FIG. 1 GENERAL ROUTE MAP i; i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............•..................................... vi INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1 GENERAL ITINERARY ................................................... 2 REGIONAL OVERVIEW ..•................................................. 6 The Alberta Plain .................................................. 6 15 The Rocky Mountain Foothills ........................................ The Rocky Mountains ................................................ 17 DAY 1: EDMONTON TO BANFF . • . 27 Road Log No. 1: Edmonton to Calgary.......................... 27 The Lacombe Research Station................................. 32 Road Log No. 2: Calgary to Banff............................ 38 Kananaskis Site: Orthic Eutric Brunisol.... .. ...... ... ....... 41 DAY 2: BANFF AND
    [Show full text]
  • THE NET VOLUMETRIC LOSS of GLACIER COVER WITHIN the BOW VALLEY ABOVE BANFF, 1951-1993 1/ ABSTRACT Three Methods Have Been Used T
    THE NET VOLUMETRIC LOSS OF GLACIER COVER WITHIN THE BOW VALLEY ABOVE BANFF, 1951-1993 1/ CHRIS HOPKINSON 2/ ABSTRACT Three methods have been used to explore the volumetric change of glaciers in the Bow Basin above Banff for the years 1951 to 1993. Using aerial photography, the extent of glacier covers for the two years were mapped at a scale of 1:50,000. The first volumetric calculation of glacier loss was based on inventory criteria (Stanley, 1970); the second a hypsographic curve method based on Young’s investigations in Mistaya Basin (1991) and the third; stereo air photogrammetry and DEM comparisons using the computer software package Surfer®. These methods were applied to the highly glacierized Hector Lake catchment within the Bow Valley and then extrapolated up to the whole basin above Banff. Reasonable agreement was achieved between the methods and the magnitude of net glacier loss from 1951 to 1993 is estimated to be 1100 to 1650 m3x106. The true value for volumetric change is considered to be towards the upper end of the range given, due to the likelihood for systematic underestimation during the extrapolation up to the basin above Banff. KEY WORDS: glacier recession; Bow Valley; volume change; water resources. INTRODUCTION Since the middle of the nineteenth century, an irregular but general rise in global temperatures has been recorded (IPCC, 1990) and many mountain glaciers have responded by retreating to higher elevations. It is estimated that mountain glaciers globally, have lost on average 11% of their total masses during the last 100 years (Meier in Mcinnis, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Marmot Creek, Peyto Glacier, Fortress Mountain Snow Laboratory in the Canadian Rockies Hydrological Observatory
    Marmot Creek, Peyto Glacier, Fortress Mountain Snow Laboratory in the Canadian Rockies Hydrological Observatory John Pomeroy, Warren Helgason, Cherie Westbrook Canadian Rockies Hydrological Observatory -10 new high altitude hydrometeorological stations - 5 high altitude stream gauge stations – nested research basins - Cryoflyux portable detailed measurement system - WISKI/CRHM: data management, information assimilation and water modelling system -Studies of snow and glacier hydrology, boundary layers, treeline ecohydrology, climate modelling, snow physics Staff: May Guan, Angus Duncan CRHO Approach • Advance development and integration of information on how hydrological and cryospheric processes interact to form streamflow. • Develop and run hydrological models to produce water resource predictions for past and future climates. Kananaskis Country Sites 35 stations – 22 meteorological, 5 groundwater and 8 hydrometric Banff National Park Sites 15 stations: 8 meteorological and 7 hydrometric CRHO Science Questions 1. How do mountain basin biophysical characteristics affect snow and ice systems to produce hydrological responses to precipitation and energy inputs on time scales from hours to centuries? 2. Do cold regions mountain hydrological systems enhance or dampen the effects of climate variability on water resources? 3. Are the Canadian Rocky Mountains a reliable future source of streamflow? CRHO Objectives 1. Improve understanding and description of governing processes for mountain water supply i. Snow and glacier cold regions processes ii. Ecohydrological processes iii. Sub-surface processes 2. Improve modelling of mountain hydrological systems i. Small scale distributed physically based simulations ii. Moderate scale headwater catchment models iii. Large scale river basin and continental models 3. Use better observations and modelling to better predict mountain water supply i. Downscale current meteorology and future climate to drive cold regions hydrology in light of concurrent ecohydrological dynamics, ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies
    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Mountains, Glaciers, Lidar
    Applications of Airborne LiDAR Mapping in Glacierised Mountainous Terrain Chris Hopkinson Cold Regions Research Centre, Wilfrid Laurier University, 202 Regina St. Waterloo, Ont. Canada, N2L 3C5 Mike Demuth National Glaciology Program, Geological Survey of Canada, Booth St. Ottawa, Canada Mike Sitar Optech Inc. 100 Wildcat Rd. North York, Toronto, Ont. Canada Laura Chasmer Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont. Canada Abstract – The paper discusses logistics & applications of varied (glaciers, forests, lakes, bare rock) terrain. This the first complete airborne scanning LiDAR survey of a survey, therefore, constitutes a significant test of current glacierised mountain basin. The survey was conducted over a scanning laser altimetry technology. 25 x 6 km area with ground height variation from 1,800 masl to 3,400 masl. The resolution of survey points on the ground Peyto Glacier, at the northern end of the Icefield, has varied from 1 per sq metre to around 1 per 4 sq metres, been a part of the national glacier mass balance program depending on elevation. Correspondence from swath to swath since 1966. Field & photogrammetric work associated with is very good despite the extreme nature of the topography & individual ground laser heights are accurate to within 20cm. glacier mass balance assessment [6] is time consuming, Glaciological applications for the high-resolution digital costly & often of low spatial resolution [1]. As such, the elevation data are outlined. Special attention is paid to National Glaciology Program at GSC is investigating radiation loading model-scaling issues. “remote” techniques for monitoring mass balance [7]. In addition, extending the Peyto mass balance record back in I.
    [Show full text]