DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council Report to Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council by Martin Pike BA MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Date: 24th November 2015 PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 (AS AMENDED) SECTION 20 REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION INTO KNOWSLEY LOCAL PLAN: CORE STRATEGY Document submitted for examination on 19 July 2013 Examination hearings held between 5 November 2013 and 4 June 2015 File Ref: PINS/V4305/429/1 Abbreviations Used in this Report AA Appropriate Assessment ALC Agricultural Land Classification BREEAM Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology DCLG Department for Communities and Local Government dpa dwellings per annum dph dwellings per hectare EVA Economic Viability Assessment Framework National Planning Policy Framework ha hectares IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan JELPS Joint Employment Land and Premises Study KLPCS Knowsley Local Plan: Core Strategy LCR Liverpool City Region LDS Local Development Scheme MM Main Modification PPG Planning Practice Guidance PPTS Planning Policy for Traveller Sites PRA Principal Regeneration Area RSS North West Plan: Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021 SA Sustainability Appraisal SADP Site Allocations and Development Policies SCI Statement of Community Involvement SHLAA Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment SHMA Strategic Housing Market Assessment SPD Supplementary Planning Document SuDS Sustainable Drainage System SUE Sustainable Urban Extension UDP Unitary Development Plan -1- Knowsley Local Plan: Core Strategy Inspector’s Report, November 2015 Non-Technical Summary This report concludes that the Knowsley Local Plan: Core Strategy provides an appropriate basis for the planning of the borough, providing a number of modifications are made to the plan. The Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council has specifically requested me to recommend any modifications necessary to enable the plan to be adopted. All of the modifications to address this were proposed by the Council but where necessary I have amended detailed wording and/or added consequential modifications and I have recommended their inclusion after considering the representations from other parties on these issues. The Main Modifications can be summarised as follows: Changing the Council’s proposed Green Belt ‘reserve locations’ for development to ‘Sustainable Urban Extensions’ (SUEs) with specific policy requirements; Removing the phased release of Green Belt development to ensure sufficient land is available to meet short term needs; Clarifying and reducing slightly the employment land requirement; Modifying the approach to retail development in town centres to better reflect national policy; Reducing the affordable housing requirement within urban areas to help ensure development is viable; Updating the policies for housing standards and sustainable construction to reflect national policy; and Adjusting the approach to biodiversity, heritage assets, open space and minerals to be consistent with national policy. - 2 - Knowsley Local Plan: Core Strategy Inspector’s Report, November 2015 Introduction 1. This report contains my assessment of the Knowsley Local Plan: Core Strategy (KLPCS – the Plan) in terms of Section 20(5) of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended). It considers first whether the Plan’s preparation has complied with the duty to co-operate, in recognition that there is no scope to remedy any failure in this regard. It then considers whether the Plan is sound and whether it is compliant with the legal requirements. The National Planning Policy Framework (paragraph 182) makes clear that to be sound, a Local Plan should be positively prepared, justified, effective and consistent with national policy. 2. The starting point for the examination is the assumption that the local authority has submitted what it considers to be a sound plan. The basis for my examination is the KLPCS Submission Document of July 2013. 3. My report deals with the main modifications that are needed to make the Plan sound and legally compliant and they are identified in bold in the report (MM). In accordance with section 20(7C) of the 2004 Act, the Council requested that I should make any modifications needed to rectify matters that make the Plan unsound/not legally compliant and thus incapable of being adopted. These main modifications are set out in the Appendix. 4. The main modifications that are necessary for soundness all relate to matters that were discussed at the examination hearings. Following these discussions, the Council prepared a schedule of proposed modifications and carried out sustainability appraisal; this schedule has been subject to public consultation. A separate consultation was undertaken on a changed approach to wind energy development (see Issue 7). I have taken account of the consultation responses in coming to my conclusions in this report, and in this light I have made some amendments to the detailed wording of the main modifications and added consequential modifications where these are necessary for consistency or clarity. None of these amendments significantly alters the content of the modifications as published for consultation or undermines the participatory processes and sustainability appraisal that has been undertaken. Where necessary I have highlighted these amendments in the report. 5. Many proposals of the KLPCS are repeated in different parts of the Plan (for example, strategic land allocations are repeated in the Area Priorities section). In most cases I have treated main modifications to repeat proposals as consequential and have not separately identified them as main modifications in the Appendix. In addition, the Council has proposed a large number of additional modifications which do not materially affect the policies of the Plan. These are solely a matter for the Council. In some instances, modifications identified by the Council as “main” I regard as “additional”, and vice versa. In this report and the Appendix I focus on what I regard as the main modifications necessary to make the Plan sound. Any of the Council’s main modifications which are not specifically mentioned in the report or Appendix are either consequential or additional, and can be made by the Council on adoption of the Plan. - 3 - Knowsley Local Plan: Core Strategy Inspector’s Report, November 2015 Public Consultation 6. There was major disquiet throughout the examination at the nature and extent of the Council’s consultation with the public during preparation of the KLPCS. Two main issues emerged – whether the dissemination of information about the evolving plan was sufficiently thorough, and whether the content of the information supplied was easily understood by most people. 7. In terms of the former, the statutory requirement is that the Council complies with its own Statement of Community Involvement (SCI). The SCI requires consultation by a wide range of methods (at least 6-8 different methods at the main stages), so the framework for consultation is thorough. There is evidence of a wide range of authorities, organisations, agencies, partners, local groups and individuals being consulted by many different methods during KLPCS preparation. Thus at each stage the Council carried out (and mostly exceeded) the required methods of engagement set out in the SCI. Moreover, at two early stages (‘Issues and Options’ and ‘Preferred Options’), a leaflet was delivered to all households in Knowsley. A small number of addresses appear not to have received the leaflet at ‘Issues and Options’ stage, which is unfortunate, but the problem does not seem to have been widespread and, given the range of other methods used, does not amount to non-compliance with the SCI. The Council used a different carrier for the ‘Preferred Options’ leaflet delivery and no significant problems were reported. 8. Turning to the content of the information disseminated, the Council has been criticised for not making its proposals clear. The main concern relates to the release of Green Belt land for development, which at ‘Preferred Options’ stage was depicted by coloured ‘blobs’ on the key diagrams included in the 8-page leaflet distributed to all households. It is true that these diagrams require careful study to gain an understanding of the proposed developments, yet many people in the communities affected were able to understand the emerging Plan and make their objections known. With hindsight the Council could have used simpler visual representations which focused solely on the main proposals, with perhaps greater detail in the text to better describe the Green Belt locations (road names and so on). Nevertheless almost 2,400 individual comments were submitted at this stage (1,400 in petitions) from 389 respondents, a significant response which suggests that the information was adequate for its intended purpose. 9. The consultation on Proposed Modifications during the examination attracted a much greater level of objection primarily because the Council directly consulted all residents living within 200m of the proposed Green Belt sites; this was a consequence of the change in status of the sites from broad locations to specific allocations. It is unclear why major objections to the long term Green Belt site at Knowsley Village were only made at this stage.1 Whatever the reason, Knowsley village residents received the same information about the Plan at earlier stages as all other residents, so the lack of response can hardly be blamed on inadequate consultation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coastal Typologies: Detailed Method and Outputs
    Roger Tym & Partners t: 020 7831 2711 Fairfax House f: 020 7831 7653 15 Fulwood Place e: london@tymconsult.com London WC1V 6HU w: www.tymconsult.com Part of Peter Brett Associates LLP Marine Management Organisation Coastal typologies: detailed method and outputs Final Report July 2011 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................5 2 TYPOLOGY METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................6 Are existing typologies appropriate? ......................................................................................6 The indicators used in the cluster analysis .............................................................................7 Short-list of indicators used in the typology ..........................................................................11 Variable standardisation .......................................................................................................13 Weighting indicators .............................................................................................................13 Creating the clusters ............................................................................................................13 Secondary cluster analysis ...................................................................................................15 Categories and names .........................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region Local Enterprise Partnership Request for Written Quotation
    Liverpool City Region Local Enterprise Partnership Request for Written Quotation for DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENERGY STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION ROAD MAP FOR LIVERPOOL CITY REGION November 2017 Contents Section Section 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Background and summary/overview of requirements 2. SPECIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS 2 A comprehensive description of requirements, specifications and criteria to be met 3. FORMAT OF QUOTATION 3 How the quotation is to be structured and how any proposal is to be presented 4. EXAMINATION AND EVALUATION OF QUOTATION 4 Indicates the basis on which the contract will be awarded, how quotations will be examined and criteria under which they will be evaluated 5. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF QUOTATION 5 Generally sets out conditions relating to such matters as need for tax compliance, freedom of information and data protection provisions, conflict of interest, intellectual property, latest time for submission of quotation, etc. Appendix 1 – Full project specification Appendix 2 - Existing LCR Evidence Base Appendix 3 – BEIS standard energy strategy scope 1. Introduction 1.1 Summary of Requirements: The Liverpool City Region has an existing Sustainable Energy Action Plan (SEAP) supported by a well-developed evidence base and a catalogue of key projects and potential projects. It has up-to-date information on carbon emission reporting. The LEP is now seeking to appoint suitably experienced and qualified consultants to independently review the existing information and, starting from this baseline, develop an overarching Energy Strategy and Implementation Road Map, and help us to articulate a compelling strategy. The work will support the development of a Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA) formal Energy Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Land and Premises Study Update Sefton Council S131(E)
    Employment Land and Premises Study Update Sefton Council S131(e)/Final Report/August 2015/ BE Group Employment Land and Premises Study Update Sefton Council CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 12 2.0 POLICY CONTEXT ......................................................................................... 21 3.0 ECONOMIC CONTEXT .................................................................................. 56 4.0 PROPERTY MARKET ASSESSMENT........................................................... 82 5.0 STAKEHOLDERS ......................................................................................... 115 6.0 EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY ................................................................... 131 7.0 LAND NEEDS OF NON-B CLASS USES .................................................... 166 8.0 OBJECTIVELY ASSESSED NEEDS ........................................................... 173 9.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 192 10.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. 218 Appendix 1 – List of Consultees Appendix 2 – Sefton Vacant Property Schedules Appendix 3 – Key Business Consultations Appendix 4 – Employment Land Site Proformas Appendix 5 – Site Scoring System Appendix 6 – Detailed Site Scoring Appendix 7 – Employment Areas
    [Show full text]
  • A Report Produced for Department of the Environment Transport and The
    Final Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise A report produced for Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Katie King Tony Bush January 2001 Final Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise A report produced for Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Katie King Tony Bush January 2001 Final Title Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise Customer Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Customer reference Confidentiality, copyright and reproduction File reference \\151.182.168.37\kk\noise\ed50035\final report\final report 15-2.doc Report number AEAT/ENV/R/0461 (Final) Report status Final AEA Technology E5 Culham Abingdon Oxfordshire, OX14 3ED Telephone 01235 463715 Facsimile 01235 463574 AEA Technology is the trading name of AEA Technology plc AEA Technology is certificated to BS EN ISO9001:(1994) Name Signature Date Author Katie King Tony Bush Reviewed by Tony Bush Approved by John Stedman The maps included in this report have been generated by AEA Technology using OS maps on behalf of DETR with permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessening Bus Journey Times on Congested Road Infrastructures: Micro-Modelling Methodology
    Lessening bus journey times on congested road infrastructures: micro-modelling methodology. Case study in the region of Liverpool, United Kingdom Gaël Thorrignac To cite this version: Gaël Thorrignac. Lessening bus journey times on congested road infrastructures: micro-modelling methodology. Case study in the region of Liverpool, United Kingdom. Business administration. 2008. dumas-00413147 HAL Id: dumas-00413147 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-00413147 Submitted on 3 Sep 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. LESSENING BUS JOURNEY TIMES ON CONGESTED ROAD INFRASTRUCTURES: MICRO-MODELLING METHODOLOGY CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF LIVERPOOL, UNITED KINGDOM Gaël THORRIGNAC Master professionnel Transports Urbains et Régionaux de Personnes Memoir defended on September 5th, 2008 Examiners: Patrick Bonnel (LET, ENTPE) Sonal Ahuja (Mott MacDonald) Christine Buisson (LICIT, ENTPE) Gaël THORRIGNAC Master TURP 2 Publication data form [Entitled of Diploma] Master Degree Diploma in Urban and Regional Passenger Transport Studies [Supervision by authorities] - Université Lumière Lyon 2 - Ecole Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'Etat (ENTPE) [Title] Lessening bus journey times on congested road infrastructures: micro-modelling methodology. [Subtitle] Case study in the region of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region Combined Authority
    Liverpool City Region Combined Authority: Spatial Development Strategy Integrated Appraisal Scoping Report (Post Consultation Update) October, 2020 Liverpool City Region Spatial Development Strategy Scoping Report Integrated Apppraisal Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Larna Smith Ian Mccluskey Ian Mccluskey Frank Hayes Graduate Urban Planner Principal Consultant Principal Consultant Associate Director Laurie Marriott Graduate Urban Planner Simon Long Economics Consultant Ian McCluskey Principal Consultant Laura Walker Equalities Specialist Alexandria Moore Principal Sustainability and Resilience Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position V1.1 May 2020 First draft for internal review. V1.2 May 2020 First draft for client review Ian McCluskey Principal Consultant V2.1 June 2020 Final draft for internal review V2.2 June 2020 Final draft for Client Review Ian McCluskey Principal Consultant V3 October 2020 Updated For Client Review Prepared for: Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA) AECOM Limited 4th Floor Bridgewater House Whitworth Street Manchester M1 6LT UK T: +44 (161) 907 3500 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. Prepared for: Liverpool City Region Combined Authority AECOM Liverpool City Region Spatial Development Strategy Scoping Report Integrated Apppraisal Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Defra Classification of Local Authority Districts and Unitary Authorities in England
    www.defra.gov.uk Defra Classification of Local Authority Districts and Unitary Authorities in England A Technical Guide Defra Classification of Local Authority Districts and Unitary Authorities in England A Technical Guide Developed by the Rural Evidence Research Centre Birkbeck College University of London July 2005 1 Contents Defra Foreword .......................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 4 2 Background ........................................................................................... 5 3 The Rural Definition Old and New ......................................................... 7 4 The Principles Behind the Classification ............................................... 9 5 The Larger Market Towns ................................................................... 13 6 The Process of Classification .............................................................. 14 7 The Criteria of Classification ............................................................... 17 8 The Rural Classification of LADs ........................................................ 19 9 A Comparison with the Previous Definition ......................................... 25 10 A Further Division of the Main Classification ...................................... 28 11 Conclusion .......................................................................................... 33 Annex 1: Major and Large Urban Areas Used
    [Show full text]
  • Air Pollution and Improving Urban Microclimate
    City Council Meeting - Wednesday, 24th January, 2018 5.05 p.m. Summary: During the Liverpool City Council Meeting on 24 January 2018, Deputy Mayor Councillor Ann O’Byrne put an Amended Motion to Council under the heading of ‘Protect Our Parks and Green Spaces’, which included the following – ‘Council welcomes the protection given to green spaces across the city in the final draft Local Plan, in particular the recognition that there ‘is no need to allocate open space to meet the City’s housing requirement’. Council welcomes the protection given to green and open spaces in the Local Plan by their classification on the Policies Map as covered by Policies GI 1, GI 2 and GI 3. Council believes that the draft Local Plan provides the basis for a new consensus in the city that can protect Green and Open Spaces and support the provision of new housing. Council calls on councillors to act responsibly and support plans to build houses on brownfield sites. Council welcomes the proposals in the Green and Open Space Review and is working to implement it. Council asks the Mayor to reconvene the Review in the run up to the 2020-2023 budget round to report on progress in protecting green and open spaces, implementing their recommendations and securing sustainable funding for parks and green spaces.’ The Substantive Motion was approved by 54 votes to 7 by Council. Councillors and committees Agenda item 254 Protect Our Parks and Green Spaces by Councillors Lawrence Brown, Tom Crone, Sarah Jennings, and Anna Key • Meeting of City Council Meeting, Wednesday, 24th January, 2018 5.05 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Action Plan: Agglomerations (Urban Areas) Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006, As Amended
    Noise Action Plan: Agglomerations (Urban Areas) Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006, as amended July 2019 © Crown copyright 2019 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.3. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ or email PSI@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Noise and Nuisance Team Ground Floor Seacole Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 2FD Noise@defra.gov.uk www.gov.uk/defra Contents Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data ........................................................................... 6 1. Aldershot Urban Area ................................................................................................... 8 2. Basildon/North Benfleet .............................................................................................. 11 3. Bedford/Kempston ...................................................................................................... 14 4. Birkenhead Urban Area .............................................................................................. 17 5. Blackburn/Darwen ...................................................................................................... 20 6. Blackpool Urban Area ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agglomeration Noise Action Plan Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006, As Amended
    www.gov.uk/defra Agglomeration Noise Action Plan Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006, as amended January 2014 © Crown copyright 2014 PB Number: 14124 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk This document/publication is also available on our website at: www.gov.uk/defra Any queries on this document should be addressed to: Environmental Noise Team, Defra, Area 2C, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR E-mail: Noise@defra.gsi.gov.uk Version control Version Description Date 1 Data Appendix to adopted 30th January 2014 Agglomerations Action Plan Contents Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data....................................................................... 6 1. Aldershot Urban Area ............................................................................................. 7 2. Basildon/North Benfleet ........................................................................................ 12 3. Bedford/Kempston ................................................................................................ 17 4. Birkenhead Urban Area ........................................................................................ 22 5. Blackburn/Darwen ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Agglomeration Noise Action Plan Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006, As Amended
    www.gov.uk/defra Draft Agglomeration Noise Action Plan Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006, as amended July 2013 © Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk This document/publication is also available on our website at: www.gov.uk/defra Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: Joan How Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Area 2B Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR NoiseAPConsultation@defra.gsi.gov.uk Contents Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data ....................................................................... 4 Example 1 ........................................................................................................................ 5 Appendix B: Detailed Agglomeration Data The table below lists the 65 agglomerations in England, to which this Action Plan applies. A hyperlink is associated with each agglomeration name which, when selected (ctrl + left click), will direct the reader to the appropriate data pack within the remainder of this Appendix. Agglomeration Name Aldershot Urban Area Mansfield Urban Area Basildon/North Benfleet Milton Keynes Urban Area Bedford/Kempston Northampton
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for Liverpool City Council
    2012 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for Liverpool City Council In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management August 2012 Liverpool City Council Local Authority Paul Farrell Officer Department Environmental Protection Unit Regeneration Liverpool City Council Address Municipal Buildings Dale Street LIVERPOOL L2 2DH Telephone 0151 233 6832 e-mail PaulD.Farrell@liverpool.gov.uk Report Reference LCC/AQ/USA2012ver1. number Date August 2012 LAQM USA 2012 1 Liverpool City Council Executive Summary Under the Environment Act 1995, Local Authorities are required to undertake regular review and assessments of air quality. Local Authorities have recently begun the fifth round of the Review and Assessment process. Each round comprises two steps. The first step is an Updating and Screening Assessment (USA). Where a significant risk of exceedence of one or more of the UK objectives is identified it is necessary for the Local Authority to proceed to a Detailed Assessment (DA). Where a Local Authority does not need to undertake a DA, a shorter Progress Report (PR) is required instead. The USA presented in this report indicates that Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 3 concentrations will exceed the NO2 air quality objective of 40 µg/m at 86% of the locations where passive diffusion tube monitoring was undertaken in 2011. This is a similar situation to 2009 and 2010 where data has been presented in a series of progress reports. However a DA is not required as the whole of the city of Liverpool and its boundaries have been designated as an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) and a DA would serve no purpose, the objective for proceeding to a DA is based on either further hotspots being identified which may lead to a change in an existing AQMA, or whereby an AQMA can be revoked.
    [Show full text]