DOCSLIB.ORG

Internet Infrastructure & Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Internet Infrastructure & Services Equity Research Technology Internet Infrastructure & Services Introducing Internet 3.0 Distribution and Decentralization Change Everything n THE RIPPLES CHANGE THEIR SIZE. This report examines the impact of distribution (of assets and resources across geographies) and decentralization (of a network’s assets and resources outward toward “edge” devices) on the Internet. It highlights the companies that will benefit or be hurt by this trend. Finally, it profiles emerging companies that are taking advantage of these trends and pushing the Internet toward its next phase, which we call Internet 3.0. n WHAT HAPPENS IN INTERNET 3.0? Thick client devices dominate the network. Edge devices communicate directly with each other. Increased traffic among devices places strain on networks, forcing network carriers to increase capacity. All of this is driven and guided by the laws of network dynamics. n EXTENDING TRADITIONAL MARKETS, INTRODUCING NEW ONES. We have identified four emerging areas in the field of distribution and decentralization: distributed processing, distributed storage services, distributed network services, and decentralized collaboration. n INTEL, MICROSOFT, SUN: INCUMBENTS TAKE CHARGE. Intel, Microsoft, and Sun Microsystems have emerged as thought leaders, each waving a flag and jockeying for position in Internet 3.0. We also profile a number of private companies that are providing thought leadership on the next phase of the Internet. We highlight their impact on incumbents and existing markets, and quantify new market opportunities. Chris Kwak Robert Fagin (212) 272-7792 (212) 272-4321 [email protected] [email protected] www.bearstearns.com MAY 2001 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................9 Napster: The Year of Living Dangerously ...............................................................................................................16 From Mainframes to PCs to the Web: A Graphical Genealogy...............................................................................22 The Laws of Network Dynamics..............................................................................................................................27 Decentralization? What’s Wrong with Centralization?............................................................................................41 Decentralized Computing Defined in Internet 3.0 ...................................................................................................49 Categories of Decentralization in Internet 3.0..........................................................................................................53 Distributed Processing: Processing as a Resource ...................................................................................................55 Distributed Storage Services: Collapsing Geographic Isolation ..............................................................................72 Distributed Network Services: Adding Intelligence to Bandwidth..........................................................................83 Decentralized Collaboration: Weaving Internet 3.0...............................................................................................102 Public Companies That Take Advantage of Distributed Networks .......................................................................117 Tempering the Tendency to Overstate the Case.....................................................................................................127 Private Company Profiles.......................................................................................................................................131 Funding and Deal Activity; Customer Momentum Already............................................................................133 Appendices.............................................................................................................................................................163 Appendix A — How Information Travels Across the Internet........................................................................165 Appendix B — Terms and Concepts in Internet 3.0........................................................................................166 Appendix C — Instant Messaging and File Sharing Architectures .................................................................172 Bear Stearns may be a market maker or be associated with a specialist that makes a market in the common stock or options of the issuer(s) in this report, and Bear Stearns or such specialist may have a position (long or short) and may be on the opposite side of public orders in such common stock or options. Any recommendation contained in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Moreover, although the information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Bear Stearns may make markets and effect transactions, including transactions contrary to any recommendations herein, or have positions in the securities mentioned herein (or options with respect thereto) and may also have performed investment banking services for the issuers of such securities. In addition, employees of Bear Stearns may have positions and effect transactions in the securities or options of the issuers mentioned herein and may serve as directors of such issuers. Copyright © 2001. All rights reserved by Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. Private Company Profiles Page Applied MetaComputing, Inc.................................................................................................................................135 Centrata, Inc. ..........................................................................................................................................................136 Consilient, Inc. .......................................................................................................................................................137 DataSynapse, Inc....................................................................................................................................................138 Ejasent, Inc.............................................................................................................................................................139 eMikolo Networks, Inc...........................................................................................................................................140 Engenia Software, Inc. ...........................................................................................................................................141 Entropia, Inc...........................................................................................................................................................142 EverNet Systems, Inc. ............................................................................................................................................143 ExactOne, Inc. ........................................................................................................................................................144 Groove Networks, Inc. ...........................................................................................................................................145 Ikimbo, Inc. ............................................................................................................................................................146 NextPage, Inc. ........................................................................................................................................................147 Oculus Technologies Corp. ....................................................................................................................................148 OpenCola, Inc.........................................................................................................................................................149 OpenDesign, Inc.....................................................................................................................................................150 Parabon Computation, Inc......................................................................................................................................151 Proksim Software, Inc. ...........................................................................................................................................152 QUIQ, Inc...............................................................................................................................................................153 Scale Eight, Inc. .....................................................................................................................................................154 Static Online, Inc....................................................................................................................................................155 United Devices, Inc. ...............................................................................................................................................156 Uprizer, Inc.............................................................................................................................................................157 WorldStreet Corp. ..................................................................................................................................................158
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1117 M. Stahl Obsoletes Rfcs: 1062, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M
    Network Working Group S. Romano Request for Comments: 1117 M. Stahl Obsoletes RFCs: 1062, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M. Recker 923, 900, 870, 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, SRI-NIC 758, 755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 August 1989 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 INTERNET NUMBERS Status of this Memo This memo is an official status report on the network numbers and the autonomous system numbers used in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Introduction This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the currently assigned network numbers and gateway autonomous systems. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from Hostmaster at the DDN Network Information Center (NIC). Hostmaster DDN Network Information Center SRI International 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, California 94025 Phone: 1-800-235-3155 Network mail: [email protected] Most of the protocols used in the Internet are documented in the RFC series of notes. Some of the items listed are undocumented. Further information on protocols can be found in the memo "Official Internet Protocols" [40]. The more prominent and more generally used are documented in the "DDN Protocol Handbook" [17] prepared by the NIC. Other collections of older or obsolete protocols are contained in the "Internet Protocol Transition Workbook" [18], or in the "ARPANET Protocol Transition Handbook" [19]. For further information on ordering the complete 1985 DDN Protocol Handbook, contact the Hostmaster. Also, the Internet Activities Board (IAB) publishes the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" [52], which describes the state of standardization of protocols used in the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Perspectives
    CONFIDENTIAL 2019 2H Update Logistics Review The Unbundling and Innovation of Logistics DISCLAIMER: ComCap LLC make no representation or warranty, express or implied, in relation to the fairness, accuracy, correctness, completeness, or reliability of the information, opinions, or conclusions contained herein. ComCap LLC accepts no liability for any use of these materials. The materials are not intended to be relied upon as advice outside of a paid, approved use and they should not be considered a guarantee of any specific result. Each recipient should consult his or her own accounting, tax, financial, and other professional advisors when considering the scenarios and information provided. CONFIDENTIAL An introduction to ComCap ▪ ComCap is a premier boutique investment bank focused on the intersection of commerce and capital, with key focus on B2B SaaS, B2C ecommerce, payments, mobile commerce, marketplaces and B2B services for retail technologies (IT and marketing services, in-store, fulfillment, logistics, call center, analytics, personalization, location intelligence) ▪ Headquartered in San Francisco with European coverage from London & Moscow, and LATAM coverage from Sao Paulo. Our firm works with mid-cap public companies on buyside initiatives and public and private growth companies on financing and strategic M&A ▪ In addition to being the only boutique focused on disruptive commerce models, we differentiate by: ‒ Bringing bulge bracket techniques to emerging models; ‒ A strong and uncommon buyside/strategy practice; ‒ Deep understanding
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHLIGHTS and SUMMARY the Startup World Gathered in Jerusalem During the First Week of March for 600 the 2019 Ourcrowd Global Investor Summit
    18,000+ Registered to attend from 189 countries 1,200 Entrepreneurs HIGHLIGHTS AND SUMMARY The startup world gathered in Jerusalem during the first week of March for 600 the 2019 OurCrowd Global Investor Summit. Over 18,000 people registered to attend from 189 countries. Entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, corporate Multinational corporate representatives, investors, government officials, and press engaged in a packed representatives week of activities, including tech and press tours, corporate meetups, VC forums, insider access to accelerators, labs, and startups – and of course, some great partying. 470 Venture capitalists The Summit has become one of the largest and most important tech events in the world and the biggest business event in Israel’s history, taking over the iconic International Convention Center in Jerusalem, as well as other venues in both Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. 210 The programming was incredibly diverse, with some 80 different sessions and over 200 Speakers speakers, providing unprecedented insight into the world of startup venture capital. On Summit Day, March 7, almost every hall was at or over capacity. 215 The 103 exhibitors and 65 sponsors broke records, as did the number of accredited Delegations investors, VCs, and multinational corporations represented. Attendees were plunged from 140 countries into a sensory experience of hands-on interaction with breakthrough technologies, insights from industry leaders, doers, and thinkers, and the shoulder-to-shoulder all-day networking that is unique to the Summit. 1,000+ Summit Week, with a record 24 events, has now become an institution in Israel. Scheduled Highlights were the new OurCrowd Advisory Forums, which harness the extensive networking knowledge and experience held by OurCrowd’s top-tier investors and corporate meetings partners, as well as the OurCrowd Pre-Summit Leaders Forum, an all-business event for the elite of the ecosystem, oversubscribed with 800 attendees.
    [Show full text]
  • Longleaf Partners International Fund Commentary 2Q21
    July 2021 Longleaf Partners International Fund Commentary 2Q21 Longleaf Partners International Fund added 1.19% in the quarter and 8.00% year-to- date, trailing the MSCI EAFE Index’s 5.17% and 8.83% for the same periods. US markets continued the monetary liquidity fueled run to ever sillier valuation levels, while non-US lagged relatively. The majority of our holdings were positive in the quarter. The Fund’s exposure to China and Hong Kong (including Netherlands-listed Prosus, whose business is driven by the Chinese consumer) was the biggest geographic headwind. FX was a moderate contributor to the Fund, as well as the MSCI EAFE index. Despite relative underperformance, it was a solid period for value per share growth at our holdings. “Value” had a (we believe temporary) pullback vs. “growth” in the second quarter on the back of lower interest rates and various other factors. Over the last year, we have seen interest rate consensus go from “low rates forever” for most of 2020 to “rates are definitely going up” in February/March of 2021 to what now feels like magical goldilocks thinking for growth stocks in the 1-2% US 10-year range. While we cannot predict precisely what rates will do in the near term, we welcome increased volatility on this all- Average Annual Total Returns for the Longleaf Partners International Fund (6/30/21): Since Inception (10/26/98): 7.45%, Ten Year: 4.50%, Five Year: 10.64%, One Year: 34.82%. Average Annual Total Returns for the MSCI EAFE (6/30/21): Since Inception (10/26/98): 5.62%, Ten Year: 5.89%, Five Year: 10.28%, One Year: 32.35%.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Demand Routing in Multi-Hop Wireless Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
    Available Online at www.ijcsmc.com International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing A Monthly Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology ISSN 2320–088X IJCSMC, Vol. 2, Issue. 7, July 2013, pg.317 – 321 RESEARCH ARTICLE ON-DEMAND ROUTING IN MULTI-HOP WIRELESS MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS P. Umamaheswari 1, K. Ranjith singh 2 1Periyar University, TamilNadu, India 2Professor of PGP College, TamilNadu, India 1 [email protected]; 2 [email protected] Abstract— An ad hoc network is a collection of wireless mobile nodes dynamically forming a temporary network without the use of any preexisting network infrastructure or centralized administration. Routing protocols used in ad hoc networks must automatically adjust to environments that can vary between the extremes of high mobility with low bandwidth, and low mobility with high bandwidth. This thesis argues that such protocols must operate in an on-demand fashion and that they must carefully limit the number of nodes required to react to a given topology change in the network. I have embodied these two principles in a routing protocol called Dynamic Source Routing (DSR). As a result of its unique design, the protocol adapts quickly to routing changes when node movement is frequent, yet requires little or no overhead during periods in which nodes move less frequently. By presenting a detailed analysis of DSR’s behavior in a variety of situations, this thesis generalizes the lessons learned from DSR so that they can be applied to the many other new routing protocols that have adopted the basic DSR framework. The thesis proves the practicality of the DSR protocol through performance results collected from a full-scale 8 node tested, and it demonstrates several methodologies for experimenting with protocols and applications in an ad hoc network environment, including the emulation of ad hoc networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Venturing Report 2019
    Corporate Venturing 2019 Report SUMMIT@RSM All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2019. Created by Joshua Eckblad, Academic Researcher at TiSEM in The Netherlands. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LEAD AUTHORS 03 Forewords Joshua G. Eckblad 06 All Investors In External Startups [email protected] 21 Corporate VC Investors https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ 38 Accelerator Investors CentER PhD Candidate, Department of Management 43 2018 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Our Results) Tilburg School of Economics and Management (TiSEM) Tilburg University, The Netherlands 56 2019 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Please Distribute) Dr. Tobias Gutmann [email protected] https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ LEGAL DISCLAIMER Post-Doctoral Researcher Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Chair of Strategic Management and Digital Entrepreneurship The information contained herein is for the prospects of specific companies. While HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Germany general guidance on matters of interest, and every attempt has been made to ensure that intended for the personal use of the reader the information contained in this report has only. The analyses and conclusions are been obtained and arranged with due care, Christian Lindener based on publicly available information, Wayra is not responsible for any Pitchbook, CBInsights and information inaccuracies, errors or omissions contained [email protected] provided in the course of recent surveys in or relating to, this information. No Managing Director with a sample of startups and corporate information herein may be replicated Wayra Germany firms. without prior consent by Wayra. Wayra Germany GmbH (“Wayra”) accepts no Wayra Germany GmbH liability for any actions taken as response Kaufingerstraße 15 hereto.
    [Show full text]
  • Range Fuels at 'End of Road'
    1A 1A HEALTH CARE BOULDER COUNTY & WELLNESS New techniques reduce pain of back problems BUSINESS 11A Serving Boulder and Broomfield Counties REPORT$1 Volume 31 Issue 3 | Feb. 3-9, 2012 Range Fuels at ‘end of road’ BY PAULA MOORE York-based Bloomberg New Energy [email protected] Failed biofuel production plant Finance. “The problem with them was absolutely technological. Their BROOMFIELD — Range Fuels situation tells you that money doesn’t Inc., a Broomfield-based biofuels takes toll on firm in Broomfield guarantee something’s going to work.” company, appears to be out of busi- by an automated system. Its website, “Range Fuels has met the end of But Christine Shapard, executive ness with the recent foreclosure sale www.rangefuels.com, is inactive. the road,” said Kalib Kersh, an analyst director of the Colorado Cleantech of its troubled cellulosic ethanol plant Recent messages left for Range Fuels at Lux Research Inc. in Boston who Industry Association, believes the near Soperton, Georgia. CEO David Aldous in Colorado and followed the Colorado company. state’s biofuels industry overall still The company’s headquarters office company founder/investor Vinod Kho- “With Range Fuels, the issue wasn’t has plenty of potential. She singled near the Interlocken business park is sla of Khosla Ventures LLC in Menlo funding,” said Alejandro Zamorano out companies such as ZeaChem Inc. vacant, and its phone number is answered Park, California, were not returned. Cadavid, a biofuels analyst at New ➤ See End, 15A FDIC has BOULDER AND BEYOND Mile High Boulder Economic Council’s 2012 forecast event paints brighter picture Banks on short leash Bank’s capital condition ‘continues to deteriorate’ BY BETH POTTER [email protected] LONGMONT — Mile High Banks is “significantly undercapitalized,” according to a document released Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Efficiency, but at What Cost?
    HIGH-TECH PRINTING MARKETPLACE AND GRAPHICS App makes connecting Cool new developments to conference calls easy in large-format printing $1 6A 10A Volume 31 Issue 13 | Date June 8-21, 2012 Energy efficiency, but at what cost? BY MICHAEL DAVIDSON place to start as the city moves toward [email protected] Proposed changes to Boulder’s achieving its climate goals, said Eliza- beth Vasatka, the city’s business sus- BOULDER — As the city of Boul- tainability coordinator. der considers changes to its climate climate action plan spark concern Prior studies have shown energy action plan, businesses and commer- properties. Passing laws that would require use accounts for up to 76 percent of cial property owners are concerned Boulder is reviewing its climate buildings to be more efficient is one of Boulder’s greenhouse gas emissions, about the possibility the city will pass plan and energy strategy, and in May the options the council is considering. and nearly 83 percent of those emis- ordinances requiring them to make the Boulder City Council had a study Making commercial buildings sions come from the industrial and energy-efficiency upgrades to their session on the topic. more energy efficient is an obvious ➤ See Efficiency, 23A ORBITAL TECHNOLOGY Drug race Business is cooking at Custom Microwave Inc. in Longmont lures local companies to fast lane Pharma firms quietly studying biosimilars BY BETH POTTER [email protected] BOULDER — Merck & Co. Inc. and Amgen Inc. — two global phar- maceutical companies with opera- tions in the Boulder Valley – appear to be on the front lines of the new and often-stealthy world of researching biosimilar drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OR TO U.S. PERSONS SoftBank Group Corp. $2,750,000,000 6.000% Undated Subordinated NC6 Resettable Notes $1,750,000,000 6.875% Undated Subordinated NC10 Resettable Notes Issue Price: 100.00% The $2,750,000,000 6.000% Undated Subordinated NC6 Resettable Notes (the “NC6 Notes”) and the $1,750,000,000 6.875% Undated Subordinated NC10 Resettable Notes (the “NC10 Notes” and, together with the NC6 Notes, the “Notes” and each, a “Tranche,” the terms and conditions of both Tranches being together, the “Conditions”)) will be issued by SoftBank Group Corp. (the “Company”) on or about July 19, 2017 (the “Issue Date”). The Notes will bear interest on their principal amount from (and including) the Issue Date to (but excluding) July 19, 2023 (in the case of the NC6 Notes) and July 19, 2027 (in the case of the NC10 Notes) at a rate of 6.000 percent and 6.875 percent per annum respectively. Thereafter, the prevailing interest rate on the NC6 Notes and the NC10 Notes shall be 4.226 percent and 4.854 percent per annum, respectively, above the 5 Year Swap Rate for the relevant Reset Period (as defined in the relevant Conditions) and from (and including) July 19, 2038 (in the case of the NC6 Notes) and July 19, 2042 (in the case of the NC10 Notes) (each, a “Second Step-up Date”) the applicable interest rate on the NC6 Notes and the NC10 Notes shall be 4.976 percent and 5.604 percent per annum, respectively, above the 5 Year Swap Rate for the relevant Reset Period.
    [Show full text]
  • The 58 Most Active Venture Capital Firms for Startups in India
    The 58 Most Active Venture Capital Firms For Startups In India (and their investing patterns) ©2018 Inc42 All Rights Reserved Feel free to share this ebook without modification. 1 Introduction Once a startup has reached the growth stage, its most important requirement is undoubtedly the backing by reliable investors and an ample amount of funding to scale up. Though the concept of starting up has gained momentum recently, the small number of investors willing to show their trust and invest in new ventures has been a problem for startups. Many startups find it difficult to approach venture capitalists and quite a few times the investment structure of the investor is inadequate for the startup. So in this document, we bring to you the much needed list of the most active institutional investors and capital funds in India along with their investment capacity, investment structure, investment industries and some of their most notable portfolio startups. 2 Helion Venture Partners Investing in technology-powered and consumer service businesses, Helion Ventures Partners is a $605 Mn Indian- focused, an early to mid-stage venture fund participating in future rounds of financing in syndication with other venture partners. People You Should Know: Sandeep Fakun, Kanwaljit Singh. Investment Structure: Invests between $2 Mn to $10 Mn in each company with less than $10 Mn in revenues. Industries: Outsourcing, Mobile, Internet, Retail Services, Healthcare, Education and Financial Services. Startups Funded: Yepme, MakemyTrip, NetAmbit, Komli, TAXI For Sure, PubMatic. Contact Details: 8040183333, 01244615333, 3 Accel Partners Accel Partners founded in 1983 has global presence in Palo Alto, London , New York, China and India.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet Development Process: Observations and Reflections
    The Internet Development Process: Observations and Reflections Pål Spilling University Graduate Center (UNIK), Kjeller, Norway [email protected] Abstract. Based on the experience of being part of the team that developed the internet, the author will look back and provide a history of the Norwegian participation. The author will attempt to answer a number of questions such as why was The Norwegian Defense Research Establishment (FFI) invited to participate in the development process, what did Norway contribute to in the project, and what did Norway benefit from its participation? Keywords: ARPANET, DARPA, Ethernet, Internet, PRNET. 1 A Short Historical Résumé The development of the internet went through two main phases. The first one laid the foundation for packet switching in a single network called ARPANET. The main idea behind the development of ARPANET was resource sharing [1]. At that time computers, software, and communication lines were very expensive, meaning that these resources had to be shared among as many users as possible. The development started at the end of 1968. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) funded and directed it in a national project. It became operational in 1970; in a few years, it spanned the U.S. from west to east with one arm westward to Hawaii and one arm eastward to Kjeller, Norway, and then onwards to London. The next phase, the “internet project,” started in the latter half of 1974 [2]. The purpose of the project was to develop technologies to interconnect networks based on different communication principles, enabling end-to-end communications between computers connected to different networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Expanding Its Stake in Overseas Chinese E-Commerce Temasek and GIC Buying $1 Billion in Alibaba Stock
    Pre-Release Version Case Study Singapore expanding its stake in overseas Chinese E-commerce Temasek and GIC buying $1 billion in Alibaba stock MM/YYYY-xxxx-[the date and reference will be added by Case Publishing] This case study was written by Hye Sun LEE, Shu Yinn LIM, Samuel CHOO, Twan DE JONG, Tze Heng TAN, and Yun Fang LEE. It is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. To access INSEAD teaching materials, go to https://publishing.insead.edu/. Copyright © 2020 INSEAD COPIES MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PERMISSION. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE COPIED, STORED, TRANSMITTED, TRANSLATED, REPRODUCED OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM OR MEDIUM WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. This pre-release version may be used for teaching purposes but it has not been released externally. Pre-Release Version Summary of the Teaching Objective This case concerns the 2016 purchase of $1 billion in Alibaba shares by Temasek and GIC. Readers will understand the PE landscape better after looking at pre-deal to post-deal aspects of this unique transaction. When considering perspectives of the main stakeholders, various managerial and strategic issues also surface for discussion. Abstract In June 2016, Singapore’s state-owned investment firms GIC and Temasek Holdings purchased a combined US$1B of stock in Alibaba Group Holding from Japan’s Softbank Group, the largest investor in Alibaba at that time. This case examines the context of the sale and the motivations of the investment firms.
    [Show full text]