The Clinical Features of Posterior Scleritis with Serous Retinal Detachment: a Retrospective Clinical Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Clinical Features of Posterior Scleritis with Serous Retinal Detachment: a Retrospective Clinical Analysis The clinical features of posterior scleritis with serous retinal detachment: A retrospective clinical analysis Zhizhang Dong The second aliated hospital and Yuying Children’s hospital of Wenzhou Medical University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5150-8750 Yifeng Gan The second aliated hospital and Yuying Children’s hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Yinan Zhang The second aliated hospital and Yuying Children’s hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Yu Zhang The second aliated hospital and Yuying Children’s hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Juan Li ( [email protected] ) Guangren Hospital Aliated to School of Medicine of Xi'an Jiaotong University Haihua Zheng ( [email protected] ) The second aliated hospital and Yuying Children’s hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Research Article Keywords: Posted Date: November 30th, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.48/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published at International Journal of Ophthalmology on July 18th, 2019. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.07.16. Page 1/13 Abstract Objective: To summarize the clinical features, systemic associations, risk factors and choroidal thickness(CT) changing in posterior scleritis (PS) with serous retinal detachment. Methods: This retrospective study included 23 patients with PS with retinal detachment from August 2012 to July 2017. All patients were documented with the Medical history and clinical features were recorded. The examinations included best corrected visual acuity (BACV), intraocular pressureIOP, fundus examination, routine eye examinations. Posterior coats thickness (PCT) was determined by B scan Ultrasound, the CT was measured by enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). And clinical data were compiled and analyzed. Results: After application of extensive exclusion criteria, 23 patients with PS remained (13 females, 10 males). The average age at presentation was 29.5 ± 9.24 years old. Ocular pain and blurred vision were the two most common symptoms complained by patients. Anterior scleritis occurred in 12 patients, which was conrmed by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM) examination. Despite all patients displaying serous retinal detachment in their macula, no uorescein leakage was observed in the macular. Optic disc swelling was documented in 10 of the 23 eyes. From B-scan ultrasound examination, the PCT increased with uid in Tenon’s capsule demonstrated as a typical T-sign. The average PCT was 2.51 ± 0.85 mm in the PS-affected eye and only 1.09 ± 0.29 mm in the unaffected eye; this difference reached statistical signicance. The subfoveal CT increased to an average of 442.61 ± 55.61μm, which correlated with axis length and PCT, but not with IOP. The BCVA and IOP did not correlate with either CT or the PCT. Conclusions: PS with serous retinal detachment presented with a variety of symptoms, such as pain and visual loss, and physical indicators. Typical T-sign detected by B-scan ultrasound was a useful conrmatory sign for PS diagnosis. Pathological increases in CT might be a potential predictive factor for inammation. Introduction Posterior scleritis (PS) is an uncommon and under-diagnosed condition caused by inammation of the sclera (i.e. the brous outer layer of the eye) [1]. Due to its low incidence and variable clinical presentation, the mechanism underlying PS remains unclear and the majority of the research to date has focused instead on characterizing its clinical features, and optimizing diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcome[2-4]. Based on the anatomical location, PS presents with a range of clinical features, especially in fundus change, and, therefore, is often misdiagnosed as intraocular inammation[5], ocular tumors[6], or orbital inammation[7]; such misdiagnoses[8] increase the likelihood of incurring irreversible visual damage including eventual vision loss. Given the high rates of retinal detachment in PS[4], this condition can be easily misdiagnosed as central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC), which is characterized by retinal detachment in or around the macula. There is currently a paucity of research dedicated to detailing the differences between these two diseases. These factors motivated our interest in the clinical features and risk factors involved in PS with Page 2/13 retinal detachment specically. This research was performed toward fully characterizing the clinical features, systemic associations, and risk factors in PS with retinal detachment. Recently some studies have suggested that choroidal expansion might play an important role in PS[9, 10]. Due to advances in ophthalmic imaging equipment, choroidal thickness (CT) can be noninvasively measured by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). While studies have implicated the importance of CT in PS, but none have focused on how CT is involved in PS with retinal detachment[10, 11]. Furthermore, CT is increasingly being considered as an important risk factor in the pathophysiology of PS. However, little is known about the association between CT and other ocular biometric parameters, such as visual acuity, axial length (AL) and posterior coats thickness (PCT), in PS, let alone in PS with retinal detachment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinic ndings and association of CT in PS with serous retinal detachment by a retrospective clinical analysis. Methods Subjects and Enrollment Criteria This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Second Aliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, China. All procedures adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants enrolled in this study. All potential study participants were from a Chinese Han population and patients of the aforementioned clinic. A retrospective review of patient medical records from the ophthalmological clinic at the Second Aliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between 2012 and 2017 was performed to identify patients with a diagnosis of PS. For the purpose of this study, PS was diagnosed by presence of (1) acute or sub-acute symptom onset; (2) eye pain with or without decreased visual acuity, accompanied by various fundus changes (e.g. optic disc edema, retinal phlebectasia, exudative retinal detachment); (4) eyeball thickening and uid in the Tenon’s capsular with low echo and fascial sac edema in the eye coats, dened as typical "T" sign[3, 4, 12], revealed by B-scan ultrasound examination; Patients with any of the following conditions were excluded: incomplete clinical information, infection with acute orbital cellulitis, tuberculosis, or syphilis; trauma; tumor; the orbital inammatory pseudotumor; Grave's ophthalmopathy; macular retinal detachment with abnormal leakage in fundus uorescein angiography; rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; any obvious cataract leading to an intumescent lens; a history of intraocular surgery; inability to tolerate ophthalmological examination; clinically relevant opacities of the optic media; and low-quality images due to unstable xation or a severe cataract. Of the 69 records initially identied, 16 were excluded because of insucient clinical detail to ensure a correct diagnosis or lack of satisfactory ultrasonography data. 30 PS patients were not included because no sub retinal uid was detected in our research. Page 3/13 After the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 remaining patients were included in this study. All enrolled patients were diagnosed with PS presenting serous retinal detachment over the macula. Study Measurements Demographic data on age, sex, and blood pressure were collected. Detailed clinical information regarding original diagnosis, disease onset, clinical presentation, ultrasound data, and systemic associations was recorded. All patients were regularly tested with regular blood test, CRP, ERS, P-ANCA, C-ANCA, ANA, PANA, “ASO” antigen test, dsDNA antibody, SS-A and SS-B antibody, complement series, SAA, RF factor, Immunoglobulin G and M. All subjects underwent a thorough ophthalmic evaluation, including the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement (applanation tonometry), fundus examination, ultrasonographic biomicroscopy, ultrasound (UBM), B-mode scanning (B-scan, Bio-vision Echosens, France), fundus uorescein angiography (FFA), refractive error examination, and Axial Length (AL) measured with partial optical coherence interferometry (IOL Master; Carl Zeiss Meditec, German). All examinations were performed upon diagnosis by experienced ophthalmologists who are blinded to the patients diagnosis. EDI-OCT Examination As previously described[13], CT was determined using the Spectralis device (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), by using the device’s automatic averaging (about 100 real-time frames were averaged) and eye-tracking features. First of all, in order to estimate optical magnication and achieve accurate comparisons across individuals, keratometry readings and the refraction data were collected and entered into the Spectralis software program. For the aim of ensuring high-quality images, Tthe quality of choroidal imaging was judged according to the signal-to-noise ratio, and only images ratios ≥ 20 dB were collected and used for further analysis. The resulting scans
Recommended publications
  • Differentiate Red Eye Disorders
    Introduction DIFFERENTIATE RED EYE DISORDERS • Needs immediate treatment • Needs treatment within a few days • Does not require treatment Introduction SUBJECTIVE EYE COMPLAINTS • Decreased vision • Pain • Redness Characterize the complaint through history and exam. Introduction TYPES OF RED EYE DISORDERS • Mechanical trauma • Chemical trauma • Inflammation/infection Introduction ETIOLOGIES OF RED EYE 1. Chemical injury 2. Angle-closure glaucoma 3. Ocular foreign body 4. Corneal abrasion 5. Uveitis 6. Conjunctivitis 7. Ocular surface disease 8. Subconjunctival hemorrhage Evaluation RED EYE: POSSIBLE CAUSES • Trauma • Chemicals • Infection • Allergy • Systemic conditions Evaluation RED EYE: CAUSE AND EFFECT Symptom Cause Itching Allergy Burning Lid disorders, dry eye Foreign body sensation Foreign body, corneal abrasion Localized lid tenderness Hordeolum, chalazion Evaluation RED EYE: CAUSE AND EFFECT (Continued) Symptom Cause Deep, intense pain Corneal abrasions, scleritis, iritis, acute glaucoma, sinusitis, etc. Photophobia Corneal abrasions, iritis, acute glaucoma Halo vision Corneal edema (acute glaucoma, uveitis) Evaluation Equipment needed to evaluate red eye Evaluation Refer red eye with vision loss to ophthalmologist for evaluation Evaluation RED EYE DISORDERS: AN ANATOMIC APPROACH • Face • Adnexa – Orbital area – Lids – Ocular movements • Globe – Conjunctiva, sclera – Anterior chamber (using slit lamp if possible) – Intraocular pressure Disorders of the Ocular Adnexa Disorders of the Ocular Adnexa Hordeolum Disorders of the Ocular
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosing, Treating, and Managing Scleritis in 2020 an Expert Panel Recommendation Panel Members Melissa Toyos, Md Stephen D
    DIAGNOSING, TREATING, AND MANAGING SCLERITIS IN 2020 AN EXPERT PANEL RECOMMENDATION PANEL MEMBERS MELISSA TOYOS, MD STEPHEN D. ANESI, MD, FACS n Partner and Director of Research n Massachusetts Eye Research & Surgery Institution n Toyos Clinic n Waltham, MA n Nashville, TN DAVID S. CHU, MD n Medical Director, Metropolitan Eye Research THOMAS A. ALBINI, MD & Surgery Institute n Professor of Clinical Ophthalmology n Associate Professor of Clinical Ophthalmology n University of Miami Health n Rutgers University n Bascom Palmer Eye Institute n Newark, NJ n Miami, FL ROBERT C. WANG, MD n Texas Retina Associates n Dallas, TX Corresponding Author: Melissa Toyos, MD; Toyos Clinic, Nashville, TN; [email protected]. This work was supported by an unrestricted medical writing grant from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals and is based on a virtual roundtable discussion hosted by Evolve Medical Education LLC. Although uncommon, scleritis is a dangerous immune-me- DIAGNOSING SCLERITIS diated disease that can potentially threaten the structural Melissa Toyos, MD: What percentage of patients in integrity of the eye and may be indicative of potentially your practice have scleritis? life-threatening systemic vasculitis.1,2 Data on the genetic factors of scleritis is lacking, but it is thought that genes affect- Stephen D. Anesi, MD, FACS: Scleritis accounts for 10% ing systemic autoimmune diseases impact scleritis as well.2 to 15% of the patients I see in my practice. Differentiating between episcleritis and scleritis and posterior and anterior scleritis can be challenging for physicians. An David S. Chu, MD: I agree; 10% to 15% sounds right to accurate diagnosis is critical to properly treat the disease and me as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Preseptal and Orbital Cellulitis
    Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases / 2014; 4 (3): 123-127 JMID doi: 10.5799/ahinjs.02.2014.03.0154 REVIEW ARTICLE Preseptal and orbital cellulitis Emine Akçay, Gamze Dereli Can, Nurullah Çağıl Yıldırım Beyazıt Univ. Medical Faculty Atatürk Training and Research Hospital Dept. of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey ABSTRACT Preseptal cellulitis (PC) is defined as an inflammation of the eyelid and surrounding skin, whereas orbital cellulitis (OC) is an inflammation of the posterior septum of the eyelid affecting the orbit and its contents. Periorbital tissues may become infected as a result of trauma (including insect bites) or primary bacteremia. Orbital cellulitis generally occurs as a complication of sinusitis. The most commonly isolated organisms are Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneu- moniae, S. epidermidis, Haempphilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and S. pyogenes. The method for the diagnosis of OS and PS is computed tomography. Using effective antibiotics is a mainstay for the treatment of PC and OC. There is an agreement that surgical drainage should be performed in cases of complete ophthalmoplegia or significant visual impairment or large abscesses formation. This infections are also at a greater risk of acute visual loss, cavernous sinus thrombosis, meningitis, cerebritis, endo- phthalmitis, and brain abscess in children. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial to control the infection. Diagnosis, treatment, management and complications of PC and OC are summarized in this manuscript. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 4(3): 123-127 Key words: infection, cellulitis, orbita, preseptal, diagnosis, treatment Preseptal ve Orbital Sellülit ÖZET Preseptal selülit (PS) göz kapağı ve çevresindeki dokunun iltihabi reaksiyonu iken orbital selülit (OS) orbitayı ve onun içeriğini etkileyen septum arkası dokuların iltihabıdır.
    [Show full text]
  • CAUSES, COMPLICATIONS &TREATMENT of A“RED EYE”
    CAUSES, COMPLICATIONS & TREATMENT of a “RED EYE” 8 Most cases of “red eye” seen in general practice are likely to be conjunctivitis or a superficial corneal injury, however, red eye can also indicate a serious eye condition such as acute angle glaucoma, iritis, keratitis or scleritis. Features such as significant pain, photophobia, reduced visual acuity and a unilateral presentation are “red flags” that a sight-threatening condition may be present. In the absence of specialised eye examination equipment, such as a slit lamp, General Practitioners must rely on identifying these key features to know which patients require referral to an Ophthalmologist for further assessment. Is it conjunctivitis or is it something more Iritis is also known as anterior uveitis; posterior uveitis is serious? inflammation of the choroid (choroiditis). Complications include glaucoma, cataract and macular oedema. The most likely cause of a red eye in patients who present to 4. Scleritis is inflammation of the sclera. This is a very rare general practice is conjunctivitis. However, red eye can also be presentation, usually associated with autoimmune a feature of a more serious eye condition, in which a delay in disease, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis. treatment due to a missed diagnosis can result in permanent 5. Penetrating eye injury or embedded foreign body; red visual loss. In addition, the inappropriate use of antibacterial eye is not always a feature topical eye preparations contributes to antimicrobial 6. Acid or alkali burn to the eye resistance. The patient history will usually identify a penetrating eye injury Most general practice clinics will not have access to specialised or chemical burn to the eye, but further assessment may be equipment for eye examination, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Very Limited Wegener's Granulomatosis and Scleritis
    A Case of Very Limited Wegener's Granulomatosis and Scleritis Jean Yang, M.D. Case Presentation: The patient is a 75 year old man who underwent cataract extraction of the right eye in March 93. The surgery was uneventful. A year and half later, the patient developed a large, rapidly advancing conjunctival mass medially in the right eye. Biopsy of the lesion revealed chronic inflammation. The right eye was treated with topical dexamethasone/neomycin/polytrim without any improvement. The patient was referred in August this year. The past medical history was significant for hypertension. Review of systems was significant for fatigue. On examination, the visual acuity was counting fingers at 3 ft OD, and 20/30 OS. The biomicroscopic examination showed a large conjunctival mass superonasally as seen below. There was diffuse conjunctival injection and inflammation. Conjunctiva inferotemporally also appeared to be elevated as seen in the figure below. Superiorly, a corneal pannus was also noted. The rest of the exam and the exam of the left eye was unremarkable. An immunologic workup included a negative ANCA, an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 65, mildly elevated soluble IL-2 receptor level at 894, and ANA with rat liver subtrate of 1:80. Urinalysis was positive for glucose, but negative for RBC. The rest of the workup including a chest X-ray, CBC, FTA-abs, RPR, rheumatoid factor, and immune complex assays were all negative. The patient underwent conjunctival and scleral biopsy of the right eye. Intraoperatively, after the conjunctiva was lifted, multiple scleral nodules were noted. Histopathology of the specimen revealed probable vasculitis with micro-abscesses, seen below, with epithelioid cells and eosinophils seen further below, suggestive of Wegener's granulomatosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoledronate-Induced Anterior Uveitis, Scleritis and Optic Neuritis: a Case Report Laura E Wolpert, Andrew R Watts
    clinical correspondence Zoledronate-induced anterior uveitis, scleritis and optic neuritis: a case report Laura E Wolpert, Andrew R Watts isphosphonates, such as zoledronate, with proptosis, periorbital oedema, conjunc- are used by approximately 55,000 tival chemosis and injection and cells and Bpeople per year in New Zealand1 to flare in the anterior chamber (Figure 1A). prevent the loss of bone density in a range There was no evidence of vitritis, and fundal of conditions such as osteoporosis, Paget’s examination was normal. 2 disease of the bone and bone metastases. A B-scan of the right eye showed scleral Although ocular side effects are rare, bis- thickening (Figure 2). The patient underwent phosphonates have been associated with a CT scan of her orbits, which revealed right- 3,4 4,5 acute anterior uveitis (AAU) and scleritis. sided proptosis with intraconal fat stranding There have also been case reports of optic and inflammation surrounding the globe 6–8 neuritis following bisphosphonate use. and optic nerve, consistent with scleritis and Here we report a case of a patient who pro- retrobulbar optic neuritis (Figure 3). Inves- gressively developed AAU, scleritis and optic tigations, including serum ACE, treponemal neuritis following a zoledronate infusion. serology, ANA and QuantiFERON-TB Gold, were unremarkable. Case report A diagnosis of zoledronate-induced uveitis, A 61-year-old woman with a past medical scleritis and optic neuritis was made. The history of previous morbid obesity with patient received 1g intravenous methyl- sleeve gastrectomy, severe reflux and prednisolone, which resulted in a rapid ileostomy secondary to hemicolectomy for improvement of her symptoms and signs by severe diverticular disease presented to the following day (Figure 1B).
    [Show full text]
  • Aspergillus Niger As an Unusual Cause of Scleritis and Endophthalmitis
    584 Manners, O'Connell, Guy,JGoynson, Canning, Etchells Table I Dye test titres, IgM levels, IgG avidity, and total although cases have been reported.6 Virtually all immunoglobulin levels in serum (S) and vitreous (V) samples reported cases had associated systemic features such as lymphadenopathy. Our provisional diag- Time (weeks) after Dye test Dye test IgM IgG Total Ig Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.78.7.584 on 1 July 1994. Downloaded from onset ofsymptoms titre (IUlml) (IU) avidity (g) nosis of acquired toxoplasmosis affecting the eye 12 (S) 1/256 125 75 32% NT was extremely unusual in an immunocompetent 22 (S) 1/256 125 55 36% NT 60-year-old person with no other symptoms. The 37 (S) 1/256 125 36 NT 12-100 37 (V) 1/16 8 NT NT 0-237 presence of toxoplasmal DNA in the vitreous sample, demonstrated by PCR was strong addi- NT=not tested. tional supporting evidence. Part of this work was funded by a research grant from the Toxoplasmosis Trust. months previously. An avidity of 40% is usually seen in infections acquired more than 6 months I Aouizerate F, Cazenave J, Poirier L, Verin P, Cheyrou A, Begneret J, et al. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in aqueous previously. The Goldmann-Witmer coefficient,3 humour by polymerase chain reaction. BrJ Ophthalmol 1993; the quotient of relative amounts of toxoplasmal 77: 107-9. 2 Burg L, Grover CM, Pontethy P, Boothroyd J. Direct and antibodies in vitreous and serum, was 3*19:1. sensitive detection of pathogenic protozoan Toxoplasma Baarsma et all consider a coefficient ofmore than gondii by polymerase chain reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Lacrimal Drainage Surgery in Wegener's Granulomatosis
    Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:329–331 329 Lacrimal drainage surgery in Wegener’s Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.84.3.329 on 1 March 2000. Downloaded from granulomatosis AnthonySLKwan,GeoVrey E Rose Abstract A small number of surgeons were involved, Aim—To examine the results of open all using the following technique. A linear lacrimal surgery in patients with Wegen- paranasal incision was followed by complete er’s granulomatosis. release of medial canthal tendon and a large Methods—A retrospective review of pa- rhinostomy was created, together with partial tients with Wegener’s granulomatosis who anterior ethmoidectomy. Anterior and poste- underwent lacrimal surgery over a 17 year rior flaps were formed from both nasal and lac- period. rimal sac mucosa and the anastomoses united Results—11 patients were identified and a with multiple 6/0 Vicryl (Ethicon) sutures. The total of 14 primary dacryocystorhinosto- medial canthal tendon, orbicularis, and skin mies (DCR) and one revisional DCR were were closed in layers and silicone stents used in performed; symptomatic relief was most cases. achieved in 13/14 operations and one patient required revisional surgery for persistent symptoms. There were no in- Results traoperative and few postoperative com- Eleven patients (eight males, three females) plications. are included in the study, aged between 34 Conclusions—In contrast with some pre- to 63 years (mean 52 years) at presen- vious reports, open DCR appears to be a tation. Wegener’s disease had been safe procedure and it is recommended as a present for an average of 9.8 years (range treatment for lacrimal obstruction in 4–22) and 9/11 patients were maintained on patients with Wegener’s granulomatosis, systemic immunosuppression before surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Characteristics and Visual Outcomes in Infectious Scleritis: a Review Emeline Radhika Ramenaden George Washington University
    Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University Health Sciences Research Commons Ophthalmology Faculty Publications Ophthalmology 2013 Clinical characteristics and visual outcomes in infectious scleritis: A review Emeline Radhika Ramenaden George Washington University Veena Rao Raiji George Washington University Follow this and additional works at: http://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/smhs_ophthalm_facpubs Part of the Ophthalmology Commons Recommended Citation Ramenaden, E.R., Raiji, V.R. (2013). Clinical characteristics and visual outcomes in infectious scleritis: A review. Clinical Ophthalmology, 7, 2113-2122. This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ophthalmology at Health Sciences Research Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ophthalmology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Health Sciences Research Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Clinical Ophthalmology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Clinical characteristics and visual outcomes in infectious scleritis: a review Emeline Radhika Ramenaden Abstract: Infection is a very important but rare cause of scleritis, occurring in about 5%–10% Veena Rao Raiji of all patients presenting with scleral inflammation. However, due to the similarity of its presentation, infectious scleritis is often initially managed as autoimmune, potentially further Department of Ophthalmology, George Washington University, worsening its outcome. The overall visual outcome in infectious scleritis is generally worse Washington, DC, USA than its autoimmune counterparts, perhaps because of the delay in diagnosis or because of the aggressive nature of associated microbes. Thus, there is a definite need for insight into the diagnostic approach and treatment options for this ocular disease process.
    [Show full text]
  • Wegener's Granulomatosis
    Wegener’s Granulomatosis: Ophthalmic Manifestations and Management Nima Pakrou, MBBS,* Dinesh Selva, MBBS, FRANZCO,† and Igal Leibovitch, MD‡ OBJECTIVES To provide an up-to-date and comprehensive review of Wegener’s gran- ulomatosis (WG) as a disease entity, focusing on the ophthalmic manifestations and management options. METHODS A search of Medline was undertaken between 1966 and 2005 regarding WG, systemic vasculitis, and the ocular manifestations of WG. Major ophthalmic and medical textbooks also were reviewed for content, as well as original references. RESULTS Involvement of ocular and orbital structures in patients with WG is common and may be a presenting feature. The ocular manifestations range from mild conjunctivitis and episcleritis to more severe inflammation with keratitis, scleritis, uveitis, and retinal vasculitis. Involvement of the nasolacrimal system and orbital tissues also can occur. Except for some cases of anterior segment inflammation, the ocular involvement will not respond to topical agents, but rather to systemic antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive regimens. Surgical intervention may be of value for obtaining tissue diagnosis, in achieving orbital decompression in cases of significant orbital disease with optic nerve compromise, or in cases of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. CONCLUSION WG is an important clinical entity that needs to be recognized early and treated appropriately. Ophthalmic manifestations are frequently encountered and can result in significant morbidity and even blindness. The management is chal- lenging and often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:284-292 © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. KEYWORDS Wegener’s granulomatosis, ocular, orbital, ophthalmic, eye, vasculitis egener’s granulomatosis (WG) is a multisystem granulo- arterial vessels, and to a lesser extent, smaller and larger Wmatous inflammatory disorder of presumed autoim- arteries and veins (3,4).
    [Show full text]
  • Scleritis and Episcleritis
    Brit. J. Ophthal. (I976) 6o, I 63 Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.60.3.163 on 1 March 1976. Downloaded from Scleritis and episcleritis PETER G. WATSON* AND SOHAN SINGH HAYREHt From Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London*, and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge*, and the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USAt From the earliest available descriptions of episcleritis Leigh, I965), subconjunctival phlegma or simple (Slade, 1838; Rognetta, i844; Desmarres, 1847) or phlegmatous conjunctivitis by Mackenzie (I830), a confusion has existed between scleritis and and episcleritis periodica fugax by Fuchs (I895). episcleritis. This has led to contradictory views Duke-Elder and Leigh (I965) distinguished be- on the relative severity and prognosis of these tween nodular episcleritis and rheumatic episcleritis, conditions, and the erroneous belief that episcleritis but such a differentiation appears to be unjustified is accompanied by serious complications (Viswaling- as rheumatoid arthritis can be associated with ham, 1936; Wood, 1936; Mann and Markson, I950; either condition. We have classified episcleritis Clavel and Teulieres, 1958). While Slade (I838), into two types: Rognetta (i844), and Desmarres (I847), thought i. Simple episcleritis that episcleritis was both common and severe, 2. Nodular episcleritis. Mackenzie (i830) considered it to be neither and gave copyright. at the same time a vivid and accurate description SCLERITIS of scleritis. This confusion still persists today. In an attempt to clarify the position we have Many classifications of scleral disease have been been studying patients with scleritis and episcleritis proposed (Holthouse, I893; van der Hoeve, in a special clinic at Moorfields Eye Hospital 1934; Franceschetti and Bischler, I950; Duke- during the past io years.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Eyes Enucleated for Scleritis
    Brit. J. Ophthal. (1976) 6o, 227 Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.60.3.227 on 1 March 1976. Downloaded from Evaluation of eyes enucleated for scleritis FREDERICK T. FRAUNFELDER* AND PETER G. WATSON From the Scleritis Clinic, Moorfields Eye Hospital, and the Department of Pathology, Institute of Ophthalmology Of all ocular diseases few are more painful or POSTERIOR SCLERITIS serious than scleritis but, as it is a fairly rare The diagnosis of posterior scleritis has in the past disease, most ophthalmologists have relatively depended on the observation of an accompanying little experience in its diagnosis and management. anterior scleritis, although we know that posterior For the past io years Moorfields Eye Hospital scleritis can occur on its own. Cleary, Watson, has held a weekly scleritis clinic in the hope that McGill, and Hamilton (I975) have recently des- the data obtained might further the understanding cribed the characteristic fluorescein angiographic of this disease. A review of 207 patients with changes and fundus appearances in this condition, scleritis shows that 27 per cent of those with and it may be that the diagnosis will now be made necrotizing scleritis died from an associated more frequently without the need to observe the systemic disease within five years of the onset of the signs of anterior scleritis. ocular inflammation (Watson and Hayreh, 1976). In this study the referring surgeons did not use this clinical classification and patients were classified copyright. Method and material as having anterior or posterior scleritis according It was therefore important to discover why eyes with to the observed pathological features (Table I).
    [Show full text]