NIMBY Syndrome and Landfills

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NIMBY Syndrome and Landfills ORIGINAL ARTICLE N.I.M.B.Y. Syndrome and Landfills: The case of the landfills in the Region of Pella and the emergence of a NIMBY syndrome Y. Frangopoulos, E. Kolovou, D. Kourkouridis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Abstract: The main aim of the paper is the exploration of a possible Not in My Backyard Phenomenon (NIMBY) in the region of Pella, because of the irrational functioning of the Landfills of Aridaia and Edessa. The exploration that central hypothesis initially attempted through clarification of bibliographic and theoretical sources (social, economic, political, etc.) involved in the expression of the syndrome N.I.M.Β.Y. and with regard to the waste management practices. The primary research with questionnaires and interviews concerned the inhabitants of the communities that are located in the area of the landfills of Aridaia and Edessa. The objective was to relate the environmental knowledge and citizens’ action with their socio-demographic and educational profile and ultimately their willingness to play a role in participatory planning and environmental control processes of the landfills operating in their areas. Our parallel objective was to identify the potential factors that may be a cause of rebound NIMBY phenomena. Keywords: N.I.M.B.Y. (Not In My Back Yard); Landfills; waste management; sociology of space; Regional Unit of Pellas 1. Introduction The so–called N.I.M.B.Y. syndrome refers to models that are based simply on the social reaction of citizens against unwanted facilities that can generate environmental, economical, social (exclusion) and other dangers. The territorial adjacency of place with an activity which from social regard is comprehended as dangerous and threatening, leads to various behaviours of opposition. Τherefore, the place in the space and the perception of danger and risk from the society regarding N.I.M.B.Y syndrome can be considered as two independent variables. According to Glaberso as he is mentioned from Kraft & Clary[1] the theoretical approaches that spring from literary, scientific and journalistic sources report that N.I.M.B.Y noisy, powerful and express itself everywhere. «Nimbys» usually demand from the authorities to fully involve the public with the openness and integrity in all aspects of the planning process. Although the N.I.M.B.Y. phenomenon appears now days more and more often and assembles dynamic mobilisations the scientific literature on the determinants and magnitude of the N.I.M.B.Y. syndrome is still scant[2]. According to Likou[3], waste management term, refers the activities of provisional storage, collection, transport, transhipment, treatment, exploitation, re-use or final disposal in natural recipients of the waste including the monitoring of this work as well as the later care of spaces of disposal. Aim of the waste management is the reduction of their production. This reduction is possible to be achieved via technical, economic and legislative regulations as well as through a frame of social behaviour and attendance of citizens, that will aim at as the drastic reduction of weight and the volume of produced litter. The management of litter is a particularly complex process inside which coexist various economic, Copyright © 2018 Y. Frangopoulos et al. doi: 10.18686/mmf.v2i3.1123 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Modern Management Forum Volume 2 Issue 3 | 2018 | 1 social and environmental components. In the system in question and so that is ensured his rational and completed management, is essential the collaboration of all independent parts that is involved. Landfilling has been used for many years as the most common method for the disposal of solid waste generated by different communities[4]. Along with other waste disposal option such as, recycling, combustion-incineration and composting, landfilling is mostly preferred, because of its easy operation, low cost, less technological involvement and comfort of implementation[5]. The guidelines for appropriate site selection are provided through national and international (EU directive 99/31/EC) legislations. The institutional framework should aim to protect environmentally sensitive areas and ensure development prospects and citizens’ prosperity. In Greece, the national legislation (Greek Governmental Ministry Decision 114218/97) includes exclusion criteria as well as evaluation criteria. Amongst the evaluation criteria prevails i) geology/hydrogeology/hydrology, ii) environmental criteria, iii) spatial criteria, iv) operational/general and v) economic criteria. Apart from the national legislative regulations on landfill sitting that exist in each real life case study, many and various criteria have been used in the computation process. Several landfill siting techniques can be found in the literature, using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), multiple criteria analysis or their combination. Demesouka et al. (2013) included in their analysis the hydrogeology/geology, morphology, environmental, socioeconomic and design/technical/economic as decision criteria[6]. It should be noted that almost in all cases the social component (agents, groups and individuals) is present but it mostly only refers to the distance from residential areas and a total absence of the criterion of social acceptability is noticed. The reasons causing environmental problems is obvious that it is not possible to be solved only via their scientific and technical interpretation. According to Kanatschnig & Weber as they are referred from Velli (2006:3), the sociological and economic dimension that coexists in the interpretation of problem has also very important consequences. It is therefore obvious, that the protection of environment should be in step with its scientific dimension and to be interpreted through the prism of human attitude and behaviour. The effort of dialogic between the human behaviour and the protection of environment means plurality, which can answer from concurrent up to fervent supporters up to opposite, intense disagreeing or simple incurious. The main aim of the paper is the exploration of a possible N.I.M.B.Y syndrome event in the region of Pella, because of the irrational operation of Landfills of Aridaia and Edessa. The investigation of central affair in question was initially attempted via the clarification by bibliographic and theoretical sources all of those factors – components (social, finances, policies etc) that are involved in the event of N.I.M.B.Y. syndrome always in relation with practices of waste management. Following, were mentioned empiric case studies so much from the national as from European space with regard to the applied practices of management of waste from which we also exported interesting conclusions related to the causes of event of N.I.M.B.Y.. In continuity, was realized the basic inquiring department of work which constituted the investigation via sociological research of case studies for the landfills of Aridaia and Edessa inside the limits of P.E. Pella, in relation always with Phenomenon N.I.M.B.Y. At this investigation, we drew primary data from the regions of interest aiming at the interpretation of sociology of space inside which functioned the two landfills. Objective was via this data, to export conclusions initial for how the social profile of sample influences the probability of event of a syndrome such as the N.I.M.B.Y. At the same time were searched questions that concerned the management of litter and the environment concerning of the local communities, subjects of sociology that were related to the planning and the arrangement of landfills, questions that concerned the relation of local citizens with the administrative structure as well as the intention of citizens for social reaction in potential environmental dangers. All the above empiric study of case, led to the export of conclusions regarding the influence of the social characteristics of individuals to the probability of event of a N.I.M.B.Y. syndrome, as well as in very interesting interpretations with regard to the perception of citizens with regard to the space, administrative structures and their ways of reaction in questions of environmental devalorisation. Finally, on the occasion all but also according to the methodology that was selected for the empiric investigation, we attempted to answer the question if in the limits of P.E. Pella will appear - outburt a N.I.M.B.Y. phenomenon as a result of the irrational operation of the landfills of Aridaia and Edessa. 2. Nature and Dimensions of the N.I.M.B.Y. Syndrome 2 | Y. Frangopoulos et al. Modern Management Forum The N.I.M.B.Y. syndrome is an extremely complicated task that influences and is influenced by a wide variety of factors. The main reason for the thoroughly investigation of the NIMBY syndrome as a social phenomenon lies on the fact that it has resulted in the cancellation of numerous interventions and projects. The appearance of NIMBY syndrome could be shortly attributed to the following factors: 1. Personal beliefs and options: Many studies have shown (Van Liere, Dunlap, Stern) that both structural social elements such as sex, social class, age, place of residence and the psychological social elements such as political belief, the activation of standards and values act as catalysts in individuals’ behavior and thus contribute to the evolution of attitudes and subsequent practice. 2. Environmental fears: The most common reason for NIMBY appearance is based on the potential environmental degradation of the area where the disturbing activity is going to appear and consequently to the decrease of quality of life[7]. 3. Sociopolitical contrasts: In many cases, the NIMBY syndrome is developed because of suspiciousness of local people to science, technology and government’s functions and processes. Moreover, lack of information and absence of public participation and involvement in decision-making, intensify social reactions.
Recommended publications
  • Incised and Impressed Pottery During the Neolithic Period in Western Macedonia
    Incised and impressed pottery during the Neolithic period in Western Macedonia Magdalini Tsigka SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) in the Classical Archaeology and the Ancient History of Macedonia December 2018 Thessaloniki – Greece 2 Student Name: Magdalini Tsigka SID: 2204150030 Supervisor: Prof. S. M. Valamoti I hereby declare that the work submitted is mine and that where I have made use of another’s work, I have attributed the source(s) according to the Regulations set in the Student’s Handbook. December 2018 Thessaloniki - Greece 3 Preface This study is the completion of the postgraduate course of MA in the Classical Archaeology and the Ancient History of Macedonia at the International University of Thessaloniki. In order for this thesis to be completed, the contribution of some people was important. First of all, I would like to thank Prof. S. M. Valamoti who accepted to supervise my thesis and encouraged me in all its stages. I would also like to thank Dr. A. Dimoula who helped me throughout all the steps for its completion, from finding the subject up to the end of my work. She was always present to direct me and to solve any questions or concerns about the subject. Then I want to thank L. Gkelou, archaeologist of the Ephorate of Florina, for entrusting me material from the excavation of Anargyroi VIIc and made this study possible despite all the adversities. Also, I would like to thank the Director of the Ephorate of Florina, Dr C. Ziota, for the discussion and the information she gave me during my study of the material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia
    XII. The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia by Iakovos D. Michailidis Most of the reports on Greece published by international organisations in the early 1990s spoke of the existence of 200,000 “Macedonians” in the northern part of the country. This “reasonable number”, in the words of the Greek section of the Minority Rights Group, heightened the confusion regarding the Macedonian Question and fuelled insecurity in Greece’s northern provinces.1 This in itself would be of minor importance if the authors of these reports had not insisted on citing statistics from the turn of the century to prove their points: mustering historical ethnological arguments inevitably strengthened the force of their own case and excited the interest of the historians. Tak- ing these reports as its starting-point, this present study will attempt an historical retrospective of the historiography of the early years of the century and a scientific tour d’horizon of the statistics – Greek, Slav and Western European – of that period, and thus endeavour to assess the accuracy of the arguments drawn from them. For Greece, the first three decades of the 20th century were a long period of tur- moil and change. Greek Macedonia at the end of the 1920s presented a totally different picture to that of the immediate post-Liberation period, just after the Balkan Wars. This was due on the one hand to the profound economic and social changes that followed its incorporation into Greece and on the other to the continual and extensive population shifts that marked that period. As has been noted, no fewer than 17 major population movements took place in Macedonia between 1913 and 1925.2 Of these, the most sig- nificant were the Greek-Bulgarian and the Greek-Turkish exchanges of population under the terms, respectively, of the 1919 Treaty of Neuilly and the 1923 Lausanne Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015)
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 31 | 2018 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015) Angelos Chaniotis Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2741 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.2741 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2018 Number of pages: 167-219 ISBN: 978-2-87562-055-2 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, “Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015)”, Kernos [Online], 31 | 2018, Online since 01 October 2020, connection on 25 January 2021. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/2741 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/kernos.2741 This text was automatically generated on 25 January 2021. Kernos Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015) 1 Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015) Angelos Chaniotis To the memory of David Jordan 1 The 28th issue of the EBGR presents epigraphic corpora and new epigraphic finds published in 2015. I have only included a few contributions to the reading and interpretation of old finds as well as a small selection of publications that adduce inscriptions for the study of religious phenomena. I have also summarizes some publications of earlier years that had not been included in earlier issues of the EBGR (2007–2013). 2 In this issue, I summarize the content of new corpora from Athens (34), Macedonia (56. 109), Termessos (64), and Hadrianopolis (79) that mainly contain dedications, but also records of manumission through dedication to deities (56). The two most important new inscriptions are the incantations from Selinous (?), known as the ‘Getty hexameters’ and a cult regulation from Thessaly.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Priority Areas for Apiculture Development with the Use of Geographical Information Systems
    agriculture Article Mapping Priority Areas for Apiculture Development with the Use of Geographical Information Systems Simeon Marnasidis 1,*, Apostolos Kantartzis 1, Chrisovalantis Malesios 2 , Fani Hatjina 3 , Garyfallos Arabatzis 1 and Efstathia Verikouki 4 1 Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, 193 Pantazidou St., 68200 Orestiada, Greece; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (G.A.) 2 Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera odos St., 11855 Athens, Greece; [email protected] 3 Department of Apiculture, Institute of Animal Science—Hellinikos Georgikos Organismos DIMITRA, 63200 Nea Moudania, Greece; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Agriculture, Vocational School (EPAL) of Edessa, Melinas Merkouri 28, 58200 Edessa, Greece; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-2381-351-364 Abstract: Supporting local and central authorities in decision-making processes pertaining to envi- ronmental planning requires the adoption of scientific methods and the submission of proposals that could be implemented in practice. Taking into consideration the dual role that honeybees play as honey producers and crop pollinators, the aim of the present study is to identify and utilize a number of indicators and subsequently develop priority thematic maps. Previous research has focused on the determination of, and, on certain occasions, on mapping, priority areas for apiculture development, Citation: Marnasidis, S.; Kantartzis, based mainly on the needs of honeybees, without taking into consideration the pollination needs of A.; Malesios, C.; Hatjina, F.; Arabatzis, crops that are cultivated in these areas. In addition, research so far has been carried out in specific G.; Verikouki, E.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Cremation, Society, and Landscape in the North Aegean, 6000-700 BCE Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8588693d Author Kontonicolas, MaryAnn Emilia Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Cremation, Society, and Landscape in the North Aegean, 6000 – 700 BCE A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology by MaryAnn Kontonicolas 2018 © Copyright by MaryAnn Kontonicolas 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Cremation, Society, and Landscape in the North Aegean, 6000 – 700 BCE by MaryAnn Kontonicolas Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor John K. Papadopoulos, Chair This research project examines the appearance and proliferation of some of the earliest cremation burials in Europe in the context of the prehistoric north Aegean. Using archaeological and osteological evidence from the region between the Pindos mountains and Evros river in northern Greece, this study examines the formation of death rituals, the role of landscape in the emergence of cemeteries, and expressions of social identities against the backdrop of diachronic change and synchronic variation. I draw on a rich and diverse record of mortuary practices to examine the co-existence of cremation and inhumation rites from the beginnings of farming in the Neolithic period
    [Show full text]
  • Public Relations and Communication Department [email protected] Tel.: 210 6505600 Fax : 210 6505934
    Public Relations and Communication Department [email protected] Tel.: 210 6505600 fax : 210 6505934 Athens, September 21, 2017 PRESS RELEASE - Announcements Postal of Cadastral Survey in the municipalities of Edessa and Almopia of the region of Central Macedonia. "Check, confirm, correct" NCMA SA has made the following announcement: On Thursday September 21, 2017, the Posting of Cadastral Data starts in the local Municipalities/Communities of: Aloros, Aridaia, Archangelos, Apsalos, Voreinos, Garefeio, Dorothea, Exaplatanos, Theodoraki, Thiriopetra, Ida, Konstantia, Loutraki, Lykostomo, Megaplatanos, Milea, Neromyloi, Notia, Xifiani, Ormi, Perikleia, Piperies, Polikarpio, Promachoi, Sarakinoi, Sosandra, Tsakoi, Filoteia, Foustani, Chrysi of the Kallikratis Municipality of Almopia and the local Municipalities/Communities of Agios Athanasios, Agra, Arnissi, Vryta, Grammatiko, Karydia, Mesimeri, Nisi, Panagitsa, Peraia, Platani, Rizari, Sotira, Flamouria of the Kallikratis Municipality of Edessa of P.E. of Pella of the region of Central Macedonia. Anyone with a legitimate interest may make an application to correct or appeal against posted data at the competent Cadastral Survey Office within two (2) months of the above date. For expatriates and the Greek State the deadline is four (4) months. In particular, for the application for correction of a manifest error, the submission deadline is until July 31, 2018. Until the same date, overdue declarations may also be submitted. To better serve rightholders, excerpts from the Cadastral Tables and Charts have been sent to them by post to the contact address declared by each citizen. Through Posting, owners of real property are able to check that their ownership is registered and correct any errors. This process ensures that the cadastral survey will be completed properly and there will be no problems in the subsequent operation of the Cadastre.
    [Show full text]
  • Costing-Pricing Methodology of Solid Waste Management Services from Regional
    Costing-Pricing Methodology of Solid Waste Management Services from Regional Solid Waste Management Bodies in Greece T.Haidakis1, D. Skoura2 TEC S.A. Business Solutions, 9 Valaoritou Street, Athens, 10671, Kolonaki, Greece Presenting Author e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Regional Solid Waste Management Body, FODSA, costing-pricing methodology 1 Electrical Engineer (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) 2 Economist (Athens University of Economics and Business), Msc in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics (University of Copenhagen) Page | 1 INDEX 1. Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Description of the Regional Solid Waste Management Bodies (FODSA) in Greece ........................ 5 2.2. Vision - General Goals of FODSA ..................................................................................................... 6 3. Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Current Pricing Policy of the Regional Solid Waste Management Body ....................................... 10 4. Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 25 4.1. Costing Model ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Attitude of the Communist Party of Greece and the Protection of the Greek-Yugoslav Border
    Spyridon Sfetas Autonomist Movements of the Slavophones in 1944: The Attitude of the Communist Party of Greece and the Protection of the Greek-Yugoslav Border The founding of the Slavo-Macedonian Popular Liberation Front (SNOF) in Kastoria in October 1943 and in Florina the following November was a result of two factors: the general negotiations between Tito's envoy in Yugoslav and Greek Macedonia, Svetozar Vukmanovic-Tempo, the military leaders of the Greek Popular Liberation Army (ELAS), and the political leaders of the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) in July and August 1943 to co-ordinate the resistance movements; and the more specific discussions between Leonidas Stringos and the political delegate of the GHQ of Yugoslav Macedonia, Cvetko Uzunovski in late August or early September 1943 near Yannitsa. The Yugoslavs’ immediate purpose in founding SNOF was to inculcate a Slavo- Macedonian national consciousness in the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia and to enlist the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia into the resistance movement in Yugoslav Macedonia; while their indirect aim was to promote Yugoslavia's views on the Macedonian Question. The KKE had recognised the Slavophones as a "SlavoMacedonian nation" since 1934, in accordance with the relevant decision by the Comintern, and since 1935 had been demanding full equality for the minorities within the Greek state; and it now acquiesced to the founding of SNOF in the belief that this would draw into the resistance those Slavophones who had been led astray by Bulgarian Fascist propaganda. However, the Central Committee of the Greek National Liberation Front (EAM) had not approved the founding of SNOF, believing that the new organisation would conduce more to the fragmentation than to the unity of the resistance forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcement
    COMMUNICATION Application of Residential Off-Peak Rates for the winter period 2019- 2020 Residential off-peak rates will apply between 01.11.2019 and 30.04.2020 as follows: 1. For residential customers registered: in all Municipalities and Communities across the Prefecture of Attica; in the wider regions of: Agrinio, Aiginio, Aigio, Aitoliko, Aktio, Alexandroupoli, Almyros (Magnisia), Amaliada, Amyntaio, Amfiklia, Amfilochia, Amfissa, Axioupoli, Argos, Arta, Astros, Veria, Volos, Giannitsa, Grevena, Didimoticho, Distomo, Domokos, Drama, Edessa, Elassona, Eliki, Epidavros, Igoumenitsa, Thiva, Iasmos, Ioannina,Kavala, Kalamata, Kalambaka, Kanalaki, Karditsa, Karpenisi, Kassandria, Kastoria, Katerini, Kiato, Kilkis, Kozani, Komotini, Korinthos, Kranidi, Kyparissia, Lagadas, Lagadia (Arkadia), Lamia, Larisa, Livadia, Nikiti, Methana, Metsovo, Molaoi, Moudania, Nafpaktos, Nafplio, Naousa, Nevrokopi, Xanthi, Xylokastro, Patra, Platamonas, Polygyros, Preveza, Provatonas, Ptolemaida, Pylos, Pyrgos, Oinofyta, Orestiada, Servia, Serres, Sidirokastro, Sofades, Skala, Skydra, Sparti, Stageira, Stylida, Schimatari, Trikala, Tripoli, Florina; on the islands of Alonissos, Antiparos, Evia, Zakynthos, Heraklia, Ios, Kea, Corfu, Cephalonia, Koufonisi, Lefkada, Mykonos, Naxos, Paros, Sikinos, Skiathos, Skopelos, Syros, Schoinousa, Folegandros. the off-peak rate shall apply on the basis of 2 different time frames: 1.1. Continuous period (23:00–07:00): applies for 8 hours. It applies for consumers who are already using this option and wish to keep it as is. 1.2. The split-hour option timetable, i.e. 2 hours in the afternoon (15:00-17:00) and 6 hours at night (02:00–08:00), i.e. a total of 8 hours. This shall apply to the following consumer groups: Consumers who have already used the 02:00-08:00 and 15:00-17:00 option until 30.04.2019; New consumers applying for off-peak rates who can use solely this option; Consumers who use the continuous option but wish to move to the split-hour option (users of this category shall not be able to return to the continuous option).
    [Show full text]
  • Spyridon Sfetas Autonomist Movements of the Slavophones in 1944
    Spyridon Sfetas Autonomist Movements of the Slavophones in 1944: The Attitude of the Communist Party of Greece and the Protection of the Greek-Yugoslav Border The founding of the Slavo-Macedonian Popular Liberation Front (SNOF) in Kastoria in October 1943 and in Florina the following November was a result of two factors: the general negotiations between Tito's envoy in Yugoslav and Greek Macedonia, Svetozar Vukmanovic-Tempo, the military leaders of the Greek Popular Liberation Army (ELAS), and the political leaders of the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) in July and August 1943 to co-ordinate the resistance movements1; and the more specific discussions between Leonidas Stringos and the political delegate of the GHQ of Yugoslav Macedonia, Cvetko Uzunovski in late August or early September 1943 near Yannitsa2. The Yugoslavs’ immediate purpose in founding SNOF was to inculcate a Slavo-Macedonian national consciousness in the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia and to enlist the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia into the resistance movement in Yugoslav Macedonia; while their indirect aim was to promote Yugoslavia's views on the Macedonian Question3. The KKE had recognised the Slavophones as a “SlavoMacedonian nation” since 1934, in accordance with the relevant decision by the Comintern, and since 1935 had been demanding full equality for the minorities within the Greek state; and it now acquiesced to the founding of SNOF in the belief that this would draw into the resistance those Slavophones who had been led astray by Bulgarian Fascist propaganda4. However, 1. See T.-A. Papapanagiotou, L’ Effort pourla creation dugland quartiergendral balcanique et la cooperation balcanique, Juin-Septembre 1943 (unpublished postgraduate dissertation, Sorbonne, 1991); there is a copy in the library of the Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessaloniki.
    [Show full text]
  • New VERYMACEDONIA Pdf Guide
    CENTRAL CENTRAL ΜΑCEDONIA the trip of your life ΜΑCEDONIA the trip of your life CAΝ YOU MISS CAΝ THIS? YOU MISS THIS? #can_you_miss_this REGION OF CENTRAL MACEDONIA ISBN: 978-618-84070-0-8 ΤΗΕSSALΟΝΙΚΙ • SERRES • ΙΜΑΤΗΙΑ • PELLA • PIERIA • HALKIDIKI • KILKIS ΕΣ. ΑΥΤΙ ΕΞΩΦΥΛΛΟ ΟΠΙΣΘΟΦΥΛΛΟ ΕΣ. ΑΥΤΙ ΜΕ ΚΟΛΛΗΜΑ ΘΕΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΧΑΡΤΗ European emergency MUSEUMS PELLA KTEL Bus Station of Litochoro KTEL Bus Station Thermal Baths of Sidirokastro number: 112 Archaeological Museum HOSPITALS - HEALTH CENTERS 23520 81271 of Thessaloniki 23230 22422 of Polygyros General Hospital of Edessa Urban KTEL of Katerini 2310 595432 Thermal Baths of Agkistro 23710 22148 23813 50100 23510 37600, 23510 46800 KTEL Bus Station of Veria 23230 41296, 23230 41420 HALKIDIKI Folkloric Museum of Arnea General Hospital of Giannitsa Taxi Station of Katerini 23310 22342 Ski Center Lailia HOSPITALS - HEALTH CENTERS 6944 321933 23823 50200 23510 21222, 23510 31222 KTEL Bus Station of Naoussa 23210 58783, 6941 598880 General Hospital of Polygyros Folkloric Museum of Afytos Health Center of Krya Vrissi Port Authority/ C’ Section 23320 22223 Serres Motorway Station 23413 51400 23740 91239 23823 51100 of Skala, Katerini KTEL Bus Station of Alexandria 23210 52592 Health Center of N. Moudania USEFUL Folkloric Museum of Nikiti Health Center of Aridea 23510 61209 23330 23312 Mountain Shelter EOS Nigrita 23733 50000 23750 81410 23843 50000 Port Authority/ D’ Section Taxi Station of Veria 23210 62400 Health Center of Kassandria PHONE Anthropological Museum Health Center of Arnissa of Platamonas 23310 62555 EOS of Serres 23743 50000 of Petralona 23813 51000 23520 41366 Taxi Station of Naoussa 23210 53790 Health Center of N.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgios Pitsilis INDEPENDENT AUTHORITY for PUBLIC REVENUE (IAPR)
    HELLENIC REPUBLIC D.G. OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND ORGANIZATION (G.D.A.D.O.) DIRECTORATE OF ORGANIZATION - DEPARTMENT D' INDEPENDENT AUTHORITY FOR PUBLIC REVENUE (IAPR) Governor Administrative Board Georgios Pitsilis Directorate for Strategic Planning Directorate for Settlement (D.S.S.) of Disputes (D.E.D.) (Special Decentralized Service) Directorate of (*) International Economic Relations (D.O.S.) Directorate of Internal Affairs (D.ES.YP.) (Special Decentralized Directorate of Legal Service) Support (D.N.Y.) (*) Directorate of Independent Department Internal Audit for Coordination of (Special Decentralized Reform Actions Service) and Communication (*) (A.T.S.ME.D.E.) Directorate for Planning Independent Department and Evaluation of Audits for the Support of and Investigations (DI.P.A.E.E.) the Data Protection Officer (Special Decentralized Service) D. G. of Tax D.G. of D.G. of Human Resources D.G. of Electronic D. G. of D.G. of Customs Administration the General Chemical and Organization Government Financial Services and Excise Duties (G.D.F.D.) State Laboratory (G.D.A.D.O.) (G.D.ILE.D.) (G.D.O.Y.) (G.D.T. & E.F.K.) (G.D.G.C.S.L.) Directorate Directorate of Directorate for Directorate of Directorate of for Human Tax Compliance Directorate Information Technology Budget & Tariff Issues, Resource of Alcohol Strategy (DI.S.TE.PL.) Fiscal Reports Special Regimes Management & Foods and Exemptions (D.D.A.D.) Directorate of Audits Directorate for Directorate (D.EL.) Directorate of Tax Applications of Financial Directorate Directorate Organization
    [Show full text]