An Analysis of Potential Water Availability from the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Prepared in cooperation with the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District An Analysis of Potential Water Availability from the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5112 Version 1.1, January 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover image. Aerial view of Tappan Lake in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio. Rendering based on original photograph provided by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District (used with permission). An Analysis of Potential Water Availability from the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio By G.F. Koltun Prepared in cooperation with the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5112 Version 1.1, January 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 Revised: January 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Koltun, G.F., 2013, An analysis of potential water availability from the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio (ver. 1.1, January 2014): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5112, 33 p.,http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20135112. ISSN 2328-0328 (online) iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Descriptions of the Lakes ....................................................................................................................3 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................3 Flow Data Used in the Analyses .........................................................................................................3 Methods of Analysis ......................................................................................................................................4 Results and Discussion .................................................................................................................................6 Limitations .....................................................................................................................................................22 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................31 Glossary .........................................................................................................................................................31 Figures 1. Map showing locations of lakes and streamgages in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio ...........................................................................................2 2. Flowchart outlining the logic by which withdrawal and flow-by amounts were determined ...........................................................................................................................5 3. Graph showing surplus-water mass curves based on current target minimum outflows for the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio .........................................................................................30 Tables 1. U.S. Geological Survey streamgages and periods of gage record used in the water-availability analyses for the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio ..................3 2. Statistics of calendar-year potential withdrawals for the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio ...............................................7 3. Statistics of Atwood Lake, Ohio, total monthly potential withdrawals for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts ..........................................8 4. Statistics of Leesville Lake, Ohio, total monthly potential withdrawals for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts ........................................10 5. Statistics of Tappan Lake, Ohio, total monthly potential withdrawals for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts ........................................12 6. Analytical period statistics of observed daily mean outflows from the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio ..........................14 7. Statistics of observed daily mean outflows by month for the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio ............................................14 8. Statistics of daily mean flow-by amounts for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by multiples for the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River ...................................................................................15 9. Statistics of Atwood Lake, Ohio, daily mean flow-by amounts, by month, for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts ..................................16 10. Statistics of Leesville Lake, Ohio, daily mean flow-by amounts, by month, for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts ..................................18 iv 11. Statistics of Tappan Lake, Ohio, daily mean flow-by amounts, by month, for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts ..................................20 12. Daily mean flow-by statistics for the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes, Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio, expressed as a percentage of observed outflow statistics .........................................................................................................................23 13. Monthly statistics of Atwood Lake, Ohio, daily mean flow-by amounts for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts, expressed as a percentage of corresponding statistic based on observed outflows ......................................................................................................................24 14. Monthly statistics of Leesville Lake, Ohio, daily mean flow-by amounts for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts, expressed as a percentage of corresponding statistic based on observed outflows ......................................................................................................................26 15. Monthly statistics of Tappan Lake, Ohio, daily mean flow-by amounts for indicated pumping rates and target minimum flow-by amounts, expressed as a percentage of corresponding statistic based on observed outflows ......................................................................................................................28 Appendix 1. 1-1. Table of cumulative surplus water at the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes as a function of target minimum flow-by amount ..................................................................33 v Conversion Factors and Abbreviations Multiply By To obtain Length foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) Area square mile (mi2) 259.0 hectare (ha) square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2) Volume million gallons (Mgal) 3,785.0 cubic meter (m3) Flow rate cubic foot per second (ft3/s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second (m3/s) million gallons per day (Mgal/d) 0.04381 cubic meter per second (m3/s) Abbreviations MWCD Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District SAS Statistical Analysis System USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USGS U.S. Geological Survey An Analysis of Potential Water Availability from the Atwood, Leesville, and Tappan Lakes in the Muskingum River Watershed, Ohio By G.F. Koltun Abstract The reduction was greatest in the lower percentiles of with- drawal; however, increasing the flow-by amount had no impact This report presents the results of a study to assess on potential withdrawals during high flow. In addition, for a potential water availability from the Atwood, Leesville, and given target minimum flow-by amount, increasing the pumping Tappan Lakes, located within the Muskingum River Water- rate increased the total amount of water that could be with- shed, Ohio. The assessment was based on the criterion that drawn; however, that increase was less than a direct multiple of water withdrawals should not appreciably affect maintenance the increase in pumping rate for most flow statistics. Potential of recreation-season pool levels in current use. To facilitate monthly withdrawals were observed to be more variable and and simplify the assessment, it was assumed that historical more limited in some calendar months than others. lake operations