Characterization and Evaluation of Wild Apricot (Prunus Armeniaca L.) Materials Collected from Southeast Anatolia Region of Turkey M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
International Conference on Chemical, Environment & Biological Sciences (CEBS-2014) Sept. 17-18, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) Characterization and Evaluation of Wild Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Materials Collected from Southeast Anatolia Region of Turkey M. Kubilay ÖNAL Abstract---The objective of this study was to determine the Apricot is a temperate-zone fruit, but some cultivars and adaptabilities of native apricot materials collected from Southeast types can be grown in subtropical areas. In the selection and Anatolia region of Turkey to Aegean Region conditions. Different adaptation works carried out on the Mediterranean and phenological and pomological characteristics of the cultivars were Aegean coastal line of Turkey (8,9,10,11), very valuable observed during study. Determination of promising types for results were obtained and some cultivars such as Precoca de adaptation trials were performed employing the "Weighed-ranked" Tyrinthe, Precoce de Colomer, Canino, J. Foulon, Priana, method. To determine them the relative points were given to the characteristics such as yield, average fruit weight, attractiveness, Feriana, Sakit 2 etc. were recommended to growers. solible solid, seed ratio by weight and aroma. The late flowering trees were marked 10 apricot types (12) As a result of two-year evaluation studies on the phenelogical and and has been found14 different late flowering types the other pomological characteristics of 24 types, 9 out of them, viz. nos. 1 2235, 2236, 2237, 2239, 2242, 2244, 2246, 2249, 2257 were selected study on Erzincan Plain (13). as promising ones. The aim of this study was to determine the most promising types for fresh consumption under ecological conditions of Aegean Coastal Region . Keywords----Apricot, characterization, pomological measures, weighed-ranked method. II. MATERIAL AND METHODS I. INTRODUCTION This study was carried out between 1998-2000 in Aegean NATOLIA is located in “the Near Eastern” and the Agricultural Research Institute, Menemen-Izmir. The material A Mediterranean” centres of plant origin originally was collected as scion woody in August 1992 from an area proposed by Vavilov (1). Many domesticated fruits and between 38o15′-39o20′ N latitude and 37o25′-38o10′ E nuts are originated from parts of Western Asia. Several fruit longitude. A total of twenty-two types was collected from tree species or their wild relatives including cherries, mahaleb, feral populations growing Southeast Region of Turkey. Trees plum, apple, pear, mulberry, grape, olive, walnut, filbert, have been marked for further visit and recollection. pistachio nut, pomegranate, fig and quince are indigenous to The samples were T-budded onto in the nursery. Budded Turkey (2). trees were planted in the experimental fields with 6x 6 m. Despite apricot having a very large spreading area over the spacing with tree replicates for each type. Routine cultural world, its cultivation is still lacated in only certain limited practices were performed from 1993 to 2000. places (3,4,5). Different phenological and pomological characteristics of Evidence and records prove that apricots have been grown the cultivars were determined during study. The bud swelling, in Turkey for more than twenty centuries. Apricots ara grown bud breaking, first blossoming, full bloom, late blossoming throughout Turkey, except in the very humid regions around and harvesting time were recorded. Determination of Black Sea and in areas of very high elevations in Eastern promising types for adaptation trials were performed Anatolia (6). employing the "Weighed-ranked" method. The relative points As in almost all fruit species, Turkey is rather rich from the were given to the characteristics such as yield (30 pts.), point of view of the wild apricot populations as well. Because average fruit weight (20 pts.), attractiveness (15 pts.), solible of propagation by seed until recent years, each occurring solid (15 pts.), seed ratio by weight (10 pts.) and aroma (10 seedling may be a variety (7). Turkey has a rich source from pts.). Some other characteristics such as fruit shape, skin the point of view of breeding that is not available in most colour, fruit flesh firmness, flesh texture, juiciness etc. were countries. also examined (14). M. Kubilay ÖNAL, Akdeniz University Vocational School of Technical SciencesEnvironmental Protection and Control Department, 07058 Antalya TURKEY. E.mail: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/IICBE.C914124 161 International Conference on Chemical, Environment & Biological Sciences (CEBS-2014) Sept. 17-18, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) III. RESULTS AND CONCLUCION Horticulturae No:384:183-187. [8] Ayanoğlu H., and Sağlamer M., 1980. Preliminary results on the Full bloom dates of types were between 10-14 March and adaptation of some apricot varieties in Mediterranean Coastal Line (in 25-30 March. The earliest ripening type was 2249, while the Turkish). Derim 3(1):3-15. latest ones were 2245 and 2246. Fruit maturity began in the [9] Kaşka N., Yıldız A., Ayanoğlu H., Sağlamer M.,and Güngör M.K., 1993. Apricot adaptation studies in the Mediterranean Coastal Region in mid of June and at the beginning of July. Turkey. In: 10. International Symposium on Apricot Culture (eds. Table 1 shows pomological characteristics of types R.Gülcan and U.Aksoy), 20-25 September 1993, Izmir, Turkey. Acta studied. Almost all types produced small fruits. The range of Horticulturae, No 384:67-71. fruit weight was between 15.4-44.6 g., sample 2239 the [10] Ayanoğlu H., and Kaşka N.,1993. Apricot selection studies in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey. In:10. International Symposium on highest and sample 2243 the lowest. Apricot Culture (eds. R.Gülcan and U.Aksoy), 20-25 September 1993, The highest yields were obtained from types 2236, 2239 Izmir, Turkey. Acta Horticulturae, No 384:177-181. and 2237 with 115, 92 and 78 kg/tree, respectively. Type 2241 [11] Önal K., Özakman S., and Özkarakaş I., 1995. The researches on produced the lowest yield, 10 kg/tree. determination of promising early and good quality apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars suitable conditions of Aegean Region. II.Turkish The highest and lowest Total Soluble Solid (TSS) content Horticultural Congress, 3-6 October, Adana, Vol.I, pp.164-168. values were determined as 9.6 and 21.8 % for types 2239 and [12] Güleryüz, M., Selection of the Quality-Fruited Wild Aprticot (Prunus 2256, respectively. Firmness of flesh varied from soft to firm. armeniaca L.) Forms Resistant to Late Spring Frosts on Erzincan Firm types were more commen than the others with plain. In: Tenth International Symposium on Apricot Culture. (eds. R.Gülcan and U.Aksoy), 20-25 September 1993, Ýzmir, Turkey. Acta approximately 73% of all types. Six different colours were Horticulturae No:384:189-194,1995. observed for fruit skin. The colour of fruit skin rangas from [13] Şen, S.M., Tekintaş, F.E., Aşkın, A., Cangı, R., Bostan, S.Z., Balta, F., cream, light yellow, yellow, orange, pink to red. There were Oğuz, H.İ., Akça, Y., Karadeniz, T., Kazankaya, A., Beyhan, O., four different colours for flesh colour; yellow, light orange, Nas, M., 1995. Research on breeding by selection of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) forms on Adilcevaz plain. In: Tenth orange and dark orange. International Symposium on Apricot Culture. (eds. R.Gülcan and Ratio of seed by weight ranged from 6.11 and 11.57 %. U.Aksoy), 20-25 September 1993, İzmir, Turkey. Acta Horticulturae Some other pomological characteristics such as freedom of pit, No:384:201-204. kernel taste, edible quality (scale in 1-10) summarized in table1,also. Table 2 shows the ranking of types according to the relative points for each characteristics used for selection. It can be seen that types numbered 2237, 2236, 2235, 2244, 2239, 2246, 2435, 2257, 2249, 2242 had the highest relative points for yield, average fruit weight, attractiveness, soluble solid, seed ratio by weight and aroma. It is concluded that there was certain amount of variability among sour cherry types which were collected from Central Anatolia and Aegean Region. Each local type is important for different characteristics and they can be a good source for the breeders. These results were also confirmed by some experiments carried out by researchers also reported (8,9,10,11). The positive and negative characters of the types will help the breeders find the best parents for their breeding programmes. All apricot types evaluated in this study are being conserved in an collection orchard in Aegean Agricutural Research Institute (AARI), and available for the researchers. REFERENCES [1] Vavilov N.I. 1951. The origin, variation, immunity, breeding of cultivated plant. Chron. Bot. 13:1-364. [2] Sykes, J.T., Propagation and collection techniques for fruit germplasm. Plant Propagater 18:15-19, 1972. [3] Plock, H., 1962. Europaische Aprikosenanbaugebiete Mitt Klosterneuburg, 12, 306-311. [4] Fiedler, W., 1962. Der Aprikosenanbau im Gebiet des cussensee’s bei Eisleben. Rheinische. Monatschrift fur Gemuse, obs-und. Gartenbau, 50 jahrrg.nr., 6, 163-164. [5] Morvan, G., 1965. Problemebezuglich des Aprikosenanbaus in Frankreich. Mitt KlosterneuburgB 15, 244-247. [6] Gülcan, R., 1988. Apricot Cultivars in Near-East. Acta Horticulturae. 209:49-54. [7] Bolat, İ., Güleryüz, M., 1995. Selection of quality-fruited wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) forms resistant tolarate spring frost on Erzincan plain. In: Tenth International Symposium on Apricot Culture. (eds. R.Gülcan and U.Aksoy), 20-25 September 1993, Ýzmir, Turkey.