DOCSLIB.ORG

Tom Emmer, Nrcc Chairman Date: November 10, 2020 Re: House Gop Gains & 2020 Electoral Success

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tom Emmer, Nrcc Chairman Date: November 10, 2020 Re: House Gop Gains & 2020 Electoral Success TO: INTERESTED PARTIES FROM: TOM EMMER, NRCC CHAIRMAN DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2020 RE: HOUSE GOP GAINS & 2020 ELECTORAL SUCCESS OVERVIEW Despite nearly every major media outlet and election pundit predicting double-digit GOP losses, House Republicans defied the odds. Currently, Republicans have netted five seats. This number will likely grow as votes are certified. Republicans project to increase our Conference from 197 on Election Night to between 208-212 members – just shy of a majority. Just how dominant was House Republicans’ performance? Republicans won 28 of the 29 most competitive House races as projected by Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight. HOW WE DID IT From Day One of this cycle, Chairman Emmer made it a priority to recruit the most diverse slate of candidates ever, and now, Republicans are welcoming a record-breaking new member class. Every House Republican candidate who flipped a Democrat-held seat is a woman, a minority, and/or a veteran. Thus far, 13 new Republican women are joining the House Republican Conference next year – breaking the record of nine new women set in 2010. Moreover, six new minorities and 11 new veterans will join House Republicans. Chairman Emmer also established from the outset of this cycle that this election would be a choice between Republicans’ message of freedom versus Democrats’ radical socialist agenda. The results speak for themselves as Democrats failed to have an answer for their socialist agenda. Soon-to-be former Congresswomen Donna Shalala and Debbie Mucarsel-Powell specifically cited the NRCC’s message tying them to socialism as the reason they lost. 1 TARGET DISTRICTS The NRCC strategically targeted 55 districts which were built around President Trump’s strength at the top of the ticket and where Republicans won congressional races as recently as the 2014 and 2016 cycles. Republicans captured their first targeted pickup on December 19, 2019 when Rep. Jeff Van Drew rejected the new socialist Democrat majority and joined the Republican caucus. Republicans netted their second targeted pickup on May 12, 2020 when Hispanic fighter pilot Mike Garcia flipped CA-25 in a special election. This was the first time any Republican flipped a Democrat-held seat in California since Bill Clinton was President. MI-03 became an additional flip opportunity district after Justin Amash left the Republican conference. As of November 9, Republicans have held NJ-02, flipped MI-03 and flipped seven additional seats of the original 55 target districts. Republicans continue to hold leads in CA-25 and six additional original 55 target districts (CA-21, CA-39, CA-48, NY-11, NY-22 and UT-04). Republican candidates in IA-02 and IL-14 are looking at potential recounts. The NRCC spent more than $37 million in coordinated and independent expenditures across the sixteen districts that Republicans flipped or are currently leading. NRCC investments helped make these wins possible. Overall the NRCC’s Independent Expenditure arm spent over $80 million supporting this diverse class of winning Republican candidates. RECRUITMENT The NRCC made it a goal to challenge Democrats in every district. Republicans contested 423 of 435 districts (97.2%), exceeding the internal goal of at least 420 districts. In total, 1,271 Republicans filed to run in primary elections this cycle. 94 women, 75 minorities, and 108 veterans advanced from their primaries or conventions and were the Republican nominee in November. In open Republican-held districts, the NRCC recruited new, diverse candidates and successfully held 32/35 seats. 2 From these seats, 63% are either new female, racially-diverse or military veteran members. The NRCC did not target NC-02 or NC-06 after they were ordered by the NC state Supreme Court to be gerrymandered to safe Democrat seats. The NRCC protected 97% of the 33 open Republican seats that were targeted. Once all the races are called, House Republicans are expected to break the record of 25 Republican women in the House. PATRIOT PROGRAM The NRCC made a concerted effort from the outset of this cycle to identify targeted incumbent campaigns and work alongside them throughout the cycle to prepare them for victory. The NRCC worked with these members to develop individualized campaign plans that established fundraising, grassroot and outreach metrics needed to win each of their districts. The 17 members who were part of the Patriot Program all exceeded previous campaign fundraising totals and records. Most importantly, zero House Republican incumbents have lost this cycle. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE FOR SPEAKER PELOSI Fifteen Democrats refused to vote for Nancy Pelosi for House Speaker at the start of the 116th Congress. With a significantly smaller margin this cycle, Speaker Pelosi will be hard pressed to find the votes she needs. Even if Speaker Pelosi survives, one thing is clear: she will be doing so with an ungovernable majority that is the smallest in two decades. Additionally, the radical socialist wing of the Democrat Party is not going quietly. Already Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has demanded every House Democrat move to embrace the most radical policies of their party including Medicare for All and the Green New Deal. The public infighting we have seen play out over the last week will continue and vulnerable House Democrats will again be forced to own every radical policy their caucus puts forward. With a successful blueprint to follow, Republicans are primed to retake the majority in 2022. 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Anthropology Through the Lens of Wikipedia: Historical Leader Networks, Gender Bias, and News-Based Sentiment
    Cultural Anthropology through the Lens of Wikipedia: Historical Leader Networks, Gender Bias, and News-based Sentiment Peter A. Gloor, Joao Marcos, Patrick M. de Boer, Hauke Fuehres, Wei Lo, Keiichi Nemoto [email protected] MIT Center for Collective Intelligence Abstract In this paper we study the differences in historical World View between Western and Eastern cultures, represented through the English, the Chinese, Japanese, and German Wikipedia. In particular, we analyze the historical networks of the World’s leaders since the beginning of written history, comparing them in the different Wikipedias and assessing cultural chauvinism. We also identify the most influential female leaders of all times in the English, German, Spanish, and Portuguese Wikipedia. As an additional lens into the soul of a culture we compare top terms, sentiment, emotionality, and complexity of the English, Portuguese, Spanish, and German Wikinews. 1 Introduction Over the last ten years the Web has become a mirror of the real world (Gloor et al. 2009). More recently, the Web has also begun to influence the real world: Societal events such as the Arab spring and the Chilean student unrest have drawn a large part of their impetus from the Internet and online social networks. In the meantime, Wikipedia has become one of the top ten Web sites1, occasionally beating daily newspapers in the actuality of most recent news. Be it the resignation of German national soccer team captain Philipp Lahm, or the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight 17 in the Ukraine by a guided missile, the corresponding Wikipedia page is updated as soon as the actual event happened (Becker 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Business and Conservative Groups Helped Bolster the Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During the Second Fundraising Quarter of 2021
    Big Business And Conservative Groups Helped Bolster The Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During The Second Fundraising Quarter Of 2021 Executive Summary During the 2nd Quarter Of 2021, 25 major PACs tied to corporations, right wing Members of Congress and industry trade associations gave over $1.5 million to members of the Congressional Sedition Caucus, the 147 lawmakers who voted to object to certifying the 2020 presidential election. This includes: • $140,000 Given By The American Crystal Sugar Company PAC To Members Of The Caucus. • $120,000 Given By Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s Majority Committee PAC To Members Of The Caucus • $41,000 Given By The Space Exploration Technologies Corp. PAC – the PAC affiliated with Elon Musk’s SpaceX company. Also among the top PACs are Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and the National Association of Realtors. Duke Energy and Boeing are also on this list despite these entity’s public declarations in January aimed at their customers and shareholders that were pausing all donations for a period of time, including those to members that voted against certifying the election. The leaders, companies and trade groups associated with these PACs should have to answer for their support of lawmakers whose votes that fueled the violence and sedition we saw on January 6. The Sedition Caucus Includes The 147 Lawmakers Who Voted To Object To Certifying The 2020 Presidential Election, Including 8 Senators And 139 Representatives. [The New York Times, 01/07/21] July 2021: Top 25 PACs That Contributed To The Sedition Caucus Gave Them Over $1.5 Million The Top 25 PACs That Contributed To Members Of The Sedition Caucus Gave Them Over $1.5 Million During The Second Quarter Of 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorary Degree Recipients 1977 – Present
    Board of Trustees HONORARY DEGREE RECIPIENTS 1977 – PRESENT Name Year Awarded Name Year Awarded Claire Collins Harvey, C‘37 Harry Belafonte 1977 Patricia Roberts Harris Katherine Dunham 1990 Toni Morrison 1978 Nelson Mandela Marian Anderson Marguerite Ross Barnett Ruby Dee Mattiwilda Dobbs, C‘46 1979 1991 Constance Baker Motley Miriam Makeba Sarah Sage McAlpin Audrey Forbes Manley, C‘55 Mary French Rockefeller 1980 Jesse Norman 1992 Mabel Murphy Smythe* Louis Rawls 1993 Cardiss Collins Oprah Winfrey Effie O’Neal Ellis, C‘33 Margaret Walker Alexander Dorothy I. Height 1981 Oran W. Eagleson Albert E. Manley Carol Moseley Braun 1994 Mary Brookins Ross, C‘28 Donna Shalala Shirley Chisholm Susan Taylor Eleanor Holmes Norton 1982 Elizabeth Catlett James Robinson Alice Walker* 1995 Maya Angelou Elie Wiesel Etta Moten Barnett Rita Dove Anne Cox Chambers 1983 Myrlie Evers-Williams Grace L. Hewell, C‘40 Damon Keith 1996 Sam Nunn Pinkie Gordon Lane, C‘49 Clara Stanton Jones, C‘34 Levi Watkins, Jr. Coretta Scott King Patricia Roberts Harris 1984 Jeanne Spurlock* Claire Collins Harvey, C’37 1997 Cicely Tyson Bernice Johnson Reagan, C‘70 Mary Hatwood Futrell Margaret Taylor Burroughs Charles Merrill Jewel Plummer Cobb 1985 Romae Turner Powell, C‘47 Ruth Davis, C‘66 Maxine Waters Lani Guinier 1998 Gwendolyn Brooks Alexine Clement Jackson, C‘56 William H. Cosby 1986 Jackie Joyner Kersee Faye Wattleton Louis Stokes Lena Horne Aurelia E. Brazeal, C‘65 Jacob Lawrence Johnnetta Betsch Cole 1987 Leontyne Price Dorothy Cotton Earl Graves Donald M. Stewart 1999 Selma Burke Marcelite Jordan Harris, C‘64 1988 Pearl Primus Lee Lorch Dame Ruth Nita Barrow Jewel Limar Prestage 1989 Camille Hanks Cosby Deborah Prothrow-Stith, C‘75 * Former Student As of November 2019 Board of Trustees HONORARY DEGREE RECIPIENTS 1977 – PRESENT Name Year Awarded Name Year Awarded Max Cleland Herschelle Sullivan Challenor, C’61 Maxine D.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents Worksheet 43 Secretaries of State (#1-24)
    PRESIDENTS WORKSHEET 43 NAME SOLUTION KEY SECRETARIES OF STATE (#1-24) Write the number of each president who matches each Secretary of State on the left. Some entries in each column will match more than one in the other column. Each president will be matched at least once. 9,10,13 Daniel Webster 1 George Washington 2 John Adams 14 William Marcy 3 Thomas Jefferson 18 Hamilton Fish 4 James Madison 5 James Monroe 5 John Quincy Adams 6 John Quincy Adams 12,13 John Clayton 7 Andrew Jackson 8 Martin Van Buren 7 Martin Van Buren 9 William Henry Harrison 21 Frederick Frelinghuysen 10 John Tyler 11 James Polk 6 Henry Clay (pictured) 12 Zachary Taylor 15 Lewis Cass 13 Millard Fillmore 14 Franklin Pierce 1 John Jay 15 James Buchanan 19 William Evarts 16 Abraham Lincoln 17 Andrew Johnson 7, 8 John Forsyth 18 Ulysses S. Grant 11 James Buchanan 19 Rutherford B. Hayes 20 James Garfield 3 James Madison 21 Chester Arthur 22/24 Grover Cleveland 20,21,23James Blaine 23 Benjamin Harrison 10 John Calhoun 18 Elihu Washburne 1 Thomas Jefferson 22/24 Thomas Bayard 4 James Monroe 23 John Foster 2 John Marshall 16,17 William Seward PRESIDENTS WORKSHEET 44 NAME SOLUTION KEY SECRETARIES OF STATE (#25-43) Write the number of each president who matches each Secretary of State on the left. Some entries in each column will match more than one in the other column. Each president will be matched at least once. 32 Cordell Hull 25 William McKinley 28 William Jennings Bryan 26 Theodore Roosevelt 40 Alexander Haig 27 William Howard Taft 30 Frank Kellogg 28 Woodrow Wilson 29 Warren Harding 34 John Foster Dulles 30 Calvin Coolidge 42 Madeleine Albright 31 Herbert Hoover 25 John Sherman 32 Franklin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 53
    Union Calendar No. 53 117TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 117–78 R E P O R T ON THE SUBALLOCATION OF BUDGET ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022 SUBMITTED BY MS. DELAURO, CHAIR, COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS together with MINORITY VIEWS JULY 1, 2021.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 19–006 WASHINGTON : 2021 SBDV 2022–2 VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:59 Jul 06, 2021 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR078.XXX HR078 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROSA L. DELAURO, Connecticut, Chair MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio KAY GRANGER, Texas DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho BARBARA LEE, California JOHN R. CARTER, Texas BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota KEN CALVERT, California TIM RYAN, Ohio TOM COLE, Oklahoma C. A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida STEVE WOMACK, Arkansas HENRY CUELLAR, Texas JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska CHELLIE PINGREE, Maine CHUCK FLEISCHMANN, Tennessee MIKE QUIGLEY, Illinois JAIME HERRERA BEUTLER, Washington DEREK KILMER, Washington DAVID P. JOYCE, Ohio MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania ANDY HARRIS, Maryland GRACE MENG, New York MARK E. AMODEI, Nevada MARK POCAN, Wisconsin CHRIS STEWART, Utah KATHERINE M. CLARK, Massachusetts STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi PETE AGUILAR, California DAVID G. VALADAO, California LOIS FRANKEL, Florida DAN NEWHOUSE, Washington CHERI BUSTOS, Illinois JOHN R. MOOLENAAR, Michigan BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey JOHN H.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SURGEON GENERAL and the BULLY PULPIT Michael Stobbe a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of North Carol
    THE SURGEON GENERAL AND THE BULLY PULPIT Michael Stobbe A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Public Health in the Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Ned Brooks Jonathan Oberlander Tom Ricketts Karl Stark Bryan Weiner ABSTRACT MIKE STOBBE: The Surgeon General and the Bully Pulpit (Under the direction of Ned Brooks) This project looks at the role of the U.S. Surgeon General in influencing public opinion and public health policy. I examined historical changes in the administrative powers of the Surgeon General, to explain what factors affect how a Surgeon General utilizes the office’s “bully pulpit,” and assess changes in the political environment and in who oversees the Surgeon General that may affect the Surgeon General’s future ability to influence public opinion and health. This research involved collecting and analyzing the opinions of journalists and key informants such as current and former government health officials. I also studied public documents, transcripts of earlier interviews and other materials. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................................v Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 Background/Overview .........................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 1 April 2, 2020 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker, U.S. House Of
    April 2, 2020 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives H-232, United States Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Dear Speaker Pelosi: We are grateful for your tireless work to address the needs of all Americans struggling during the COVID-19 pandemic, and for your understanding of the tremendous burdens that have been borne by localities as they work to respond to this crisis and keep their populations safe. However, we are concerned that the COVID-19 relief packages considered thus far have not provided direct funding to stabilize smaller counties, cities, and towns—specifically, those with populations under 500,000. As such, we urge you to include direct stabilization funding to such localities in the next COVID-19 response bill, or to lower the threshold for direct funding through the Coronavirus Relief Fund to localities with smaller populations. Many of us represent districts containing no or few localities with populations above 500,000. Like their larger neighbors, though, these smaller counties, cities, and towns have faced enormous costs while responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. These costs include deploying timely public service announcements to keep Americans informed, rapidly activating emergency operations, readying employees for telework to keep services running, and more. This work is essential to keeping our constituents safe and mitigating the spread of the coronavirus as effectively as possible. We fear that, without targeted stabilization funding, smaller localities will be unable to continue providing these critical services to our constituents at the rate they are currently. We applaud you for including a $200 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund as part of H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Aaron Ann Cole-Funfsinn
    Good evening. I am honored to speak tonight on the post-election future of women’s leadership. This year and election have been unlike most others, for so many reasons, but for one, days after election day, we’re only now learning who the next President of the United States will be come January, and that we’ve finally elected the first woman, and woman of color, as Vice President. However, since you are all probably exhausted from election coverage, I want to instead focus my sermon on one of my professional heroes, the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. As I’m sure you know, Justice Ginsberg served on the Supreme Court for 27 years, with her tenure ending with her death at sunset as Rosh Hashanah began. With all of the uncertainty we are facing right now, in politics and amidst a pandemic, I find comfort in looking to Justice Ginsberg’s lifetime of leadership and service to guide me, to guide us all, as we navigate forward, particularly past this divisive election. So this talk is organized around her quotes. Ruth Bader Ginsburg often said: “My mother told me to be a lady. And for her, that meant be your own person, be independent." My grandmother, my Bubbe, was Fannie Herman Miller. She taught at this Religious School for 45 years. And she was a lady. She raised four children as Jews here in Lexington during a time often as tumultuous as this one. At a time when most women worked in the home, she was a professor at the University of Kentucky, mentoring other women.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership PAC $6000 Byrne for Congress Rep. Bradley
    L3Harris Technologies, Inc. PAC 2020 Cycle Contributions Name Candidate Office Total ALABAMA American Security PAC Rep. Mike Rogers (R) Leadership PAC $6,000 Byrne for Congress Rep. Bradley Byrne (R) Congressional District 1 $2,000 Defend America PAC Sen. Richard Shelby (R) Leadership PAC $5,000 Doug Jones for Senate Committee Sen. Doug Jones (D) United States Senate $5,000 Martha Roby for Congress Rep. Martha Roby (R) Congressional District 2 $3,000 Mike Rogers for Congress Rep. Mike Rogers (R) Congressional District 3 $11,000 Robert Aderholt for Congress Rep. Robert Aderholt (R) Congressional District 4 $3,500 Terri Sewell for Congress Rep. Terri Sewell (D) Congressional District 7 $10,000 Together Everyone Realizes Real Impact Rep. Terri Sewell (D) Leadership PAC $5,000 (TERRI) PAC ALASKA Alaskans For Dan Sullivan Sen. Dan Sullivan (R) United States Senate $5,000 Lisa Murkowski For US Senate Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) United States Senate $5,000 ARIZONA David Schweikert for Congress Rep. David Schweikert (R) Congressional District 6 $2,500 Gallego for Arizona Rep. Ruben Gallego (D) Congressional District 7 $3,000 Kirkpatrick for Congress Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Congressional District 2 $7,000 McSally for Senate, Inc Sen. Martha McSally (R) United States Senate $10,000 Sinema for Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D) United States Senate $5,000 Stanton for Congress Rep. Greg Stanton (D) Congressional District 9 $8,000 Thunderbolt PAC Sen. Martha McSally (R) Leadership PAC $5,000 ARKANSAS Crawford for Congress Rep. Rick Crawford (R) Congressional District 1 $2,500 Womack for Congress Committee Rep. Steve Womack (R) Congressional District 3 $3,500 CALIFORNIA United for a Strong America Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Policy in the Carter Administration
    Urban Policy in the Carter Administration G. Thomas Kingsley Karina Fortuny May 2010 The What Works Collaborative is a foundation-supported research partnership that conducts timely research and analysis to help inform the implementation of an evidence-based housing and urban policy agenda. The Collaborative consists of researchers from the Brookings Institution’s Metropolitan Policy Program, Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, New York University’s Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, and the Urban Institute’s Center for Metropolitan Housing and Communities, as well as other experts from practice, policy, and academia. Support for the Collaborative comes from the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Kresge Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Surdna Foundation. The Urban Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan policy research and educational organization that examines the social, economic, and governance problems facing the nation. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. URBAN POLICY IN THE CARTER ADMINISTRATION G. Thomas Kingsley and Karina Fortuny, the Urban Institute May 2010 In a July 2009 speech, President Obama stated that he has “directed the Office of Management and Budget, the Domestic Policy Council, the National Economic Council and the Office of Urban Affairs to conduct the first comprehensive interagency review in 30 years of how the federal government approaches and funds urban and metropolitan areas so that we can start having a concentrated, focused, strategic approach to federal efforts to revitalize our metropolitan areas.” This paper is the product of a rapid scan of available literature (and the memories of a few participants) to describe what actually happened 30 years ago as the Carter administration conducted that earlier review and policy formulation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Seventh Anniversary Awards Dinner
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu Twenty-Seventh Anniversary Awards Dinner Thursday, June 25, 1992 J. W. Marriott Hotel Washington, D.C. Page 1 of 30 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu CENTER FOR THE STUDY 0 PR Twenty-Seventh Anniversary Awards Dinner Thursday, June 25, 1992 J. W. Marriott Hotel Washington, D.C. Page 2 of 30 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu 1992 RECIPIENTS PROGRAM HONORABLE LLOYD BENTSEN United States Senate, (D) Texas PRESENTATION OF COLORS Since 1971, Lloyd Bentsen has served as a member of the United States The United States Armed Forces Joint Color Guard SenaterepresentingtheStateofTexas. During this time, the Senator served as Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and as Vice Chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation. He is a member of the Senate Commerce, NATIONAL ANTHEM Science and Trans1'9rtation Committee as well as the Joint Economic Virginia Drake, Baltimore Opera Company Committee. In 1988, Sena tor Bentsen was the Democratic Party nominee for Vice President of the United States. Senator Bentsen received a law degree from the University of Texas INVOCATION School of Law in 1942. Upon Graduation, he enlisted in the Army Air Forces, and earned the rank of Major as a B-24 pilot and Squadron Com- Richard C. Halverson, Chaplain mander. He was promoted to Colonel in the Air Force Reserve before United States Senate completing his military service.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S
    S 298 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE January 23, 1996 Government, but at least there has the welfare reform bill passed by the announcing my candidacy for the U.S. been agreement on that principle. Senate with overwhelming numbers, Senate on November 17, 1975, in the There is a substantial question as to some 87 Senators voting in favor of the first election cycle where the 1974 elec- whether the balanced budget proposal measure, there was a great deal of reli- tion law was in effect. At that time the offered by the administration meets ance on the block grants. There is an spending limitation applied to what an the ``fair'' criterion, since so much of it area for compromise on providing the individual could spend, and, for a State is deferred until the years 2001 and 2002. bulk of welfare related programs the size of Pennsylvania, it was $35,000. But I think there is ample room for ne- through block grants but certain spe- I decided to run for the office of U.S. gotiation, in order to have a realistic cific programs should remain with Senate against a very distinguished agreement made in those terms. standards established by the Federal American who later became a U.S. Sen- I spoke on this matter to some ex- Government. I think the statement ator, John Heinz. After my election in tent yesterday and wish to amplify it made by the very distinguished Sen- 1980, he and I formed a very close work- today. One set of figures which bear re- ator from Maine, Margaret Chase ing partnership and very close friend- peating are the statistics on the nar- Smith, is worth repeating, when she ship.
    [Show full text]