DOCSLIB.ORG

Language Grouse-3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Language Grouse-3 SFU CMPT 379 Compilers Spring 2015 Assignment 3 (preliminary) Assignment due XXX, November XX, by 11:59pm. For this assignment, you are to expand your Grouse-2 compiler from assignment 2 to handle Grouse-3. Project submission format is the same as for assignment 2 (an archive of your “src” directory inside a folder named with your sfu username). Grouse-3 is backwards compatible with Grouse-2. All restrictions and specifications from Grouse-2 are still in force, unless specifically noted. I also omit unchanged productions in the Tokens and Grammar sections. If ". ." is listed as a possibility for a production, it means "all possibilities for this production from Grouse-2". Language Grouse-3 Tokens: punctuation → -> | … Grammar: S → globalDefinition* main block globalDefinition → tupleDefinition functionDefinition tupleDefinition → tuple identifier parameterTuple ; functionDefinition → func identifier ( parameterList ) -> parameterTuple body parameterTuple → ( parameterList ) | identifier // identifier must be a tuple name. parameterList → parameterSpecification ⋈ , // 0 or more comma-separated parameterSpecifications parameterSpecification → type identifier type → identifier | … // void usable only as a return type statement → returnStatement // allowed inside a function definition only. breakStatement // allowed inside a loop only. continueStatement // allowed inside a loop only. callStatement … callStatement → call functionInvocation ; // function return value is ignored returnStatement → return ; breakStatement → break ; continueStatement → continue ; forStatement → for ( forControlPhrase ) block forControlPhrase → index identifier of expression // expression is of array type element identifier of expression // expression is of array type ever count ( expression lessOp ) ? identifier lessOp expression // expressions are of type int lessOp → < | <= expression → functionInvocation subelementReference fresh identifier ( expressionList ) ; … functionInvocation → identifier ( expressionList ) subelementReference → expression . identifier 1. Tuples Tuples are a new type of type in Grouse-3. Each tuple type is an ordered sequence of specific types. In type- notation, tuple types are denoted “tuple(type1, type2, … )” or “t(type1, type2, …)” for short. Tuple types can be considered as parameterized types, where type1, type2, etc. are the parameters, also known as the subtypes. 1.1. Tuple type equivalence Two tuple types t(typea1, typea2, … , typeaN) and t(typeb1, typeb2, … , typebM) are considered equivalent if N=M and, for all i from 1 to N, typeai is equivalent to typebi . There is no other notion of tuple type equivalence; in particular, names of the types and the subtypes are not important. When two types are equivalent, we often say they are the same. As special cases, any unary tuple type t(type) is considered equivalent to the not-included-in-a-tuple type. Thus t(int) is considered to be the same type as int, and t(t(int, t(char))) is considered equivalent to t(int, char). Also, the nullary tuple type t() is considered equivalent to a new primitive type, known as “void”. Note that the Grouse programmer has no way other than the nullary tuple type to express the void type. Any tuple type with at least two subtypes is considered a nontrivial tuple type; nontrivial tuple types are reference types. The kind of equivalence described here is known as structural equivalence because it is the structure of the types that is compared; this is opposed to name equivalence where the names of the types and subtypes must also agree. 1.2. Trivial and non-trivial tuple types Since they are equivalent to (and implemented as) either void or another type, nullary and unary tuple types are considered trivial tuple types. The type void takes zero bytes. Any other tuple type—which has at least two subtypes--is considered a nontrivial tuple type. Nontrivial tuple types are reference types. 1.3. Naming a tuple type A tuple type may be anonymous or named. Names for tuple types are created by the grouse programmer with a tuple definition or a function definition. A tuple definition is of the form: tupleDefinition → tuple identifier parameterTuple ; With this definition, the programmer declares identifier to be a name for the tuple type denoted by parameterTuple. In the function definition functionDefinition → func identifier parameterTuple1 -> parameterTuple2 body the identifier is declared as a name for the tuple type denoted by parameterTuple2. In either definition, the parameterTuple that receives the name can either be a name declared in some other tupleDefinition or functionDefinition, or it can be a parenthesized comma-separated list of zero or more parameterSpecifications: parameterTuple→ ( parameterList ) | identifier parameterList → parameterSpecification ⋈ , parameterSpecification → type identifier For example, consider the following tupleDefinitions: tuple turkey (int a, float b, int c); tuple duck (int c, float xy, int d); tuple goose (int c, int d, float f); tuple ostrich (int c, int d, float f, float g); The first line defines turkey to be a name for the tuple type t(int, float, int). The second defines duck to be a name for the tuple type t(int, float, int). Note that turkey and duck thus refer to the same type (as defined in section 1.1). On the other hand, goose is defined to be a name for the tuple type t(int, int, float), so it is a different type. Ostrich is defined as t(int, int, float, float), so it’s a different bird altogether. Now consider: tuple robin (); tuple woodThrush (bool b); tuple variedThrush woodThrush; All of the above are legal tuple definitions, and it is permitted that they appear in this order inside a grouse file. In particular, robin is defined as a name for the nullary tuple type t(), woodThrush as a name for a unary tuple type t(bool). variedThrush is defined as being equivalent to woodThrush, so it is the type t(bool). The function definitions: func whistle(int a, int b)->(char c, char d) { … } func triller(int x) -> woodThrush { … } as one of their effects, create type names exactly as if one had defined: tuple whistle (char c, char d); tuple triller woodThrush; 1.4. Implementing tuples Trivial tuples are the same type as their subtype (or void); thus, one uses the subtype implementation. Nontrivial tuples are implemented as a reference type, with records having the standard 9-byte header (typeID, status, refcount). The typeID for tuples are integers starting with 100 and ascending from there. Each different tuple type must be given a different typeID (if you’d like to assign multiple typeIDs for a given tuple type, it is not necessary, but feel free to do so). The status bits are the same as for arrays and strings, but subtype-is-reference is set to 1 for any tuple iff at least one subtype is a reference type. The size of the record for a tuple type is 9 (for the header) + the sum of the sizes of the subtypes. For instance, t(int, float) would have a record size of 21 (= 9 + 4 + 8). In the grouse compiler, each tuple type should have its own instance of the TupleType class (or whatever you wish to call this class); TupleType implements Type and it has a reference to a symbol table that contains bindings that include the name and type of each subelement, along with a (positive) offset for each, and possibly an ordinal (a.k.a. position--in case you don’t want to have to derive this from the offsets). You can acquire this symbol table by placing a scope on the tuple type’s definition and visiting its subtree. TupleType should have an appropriate “equals” method that compares the details in the symbol tables of two TupleTypes. Recall that only the types and positions, and not the names, of the subtypes matter when comparing TupleTypes. 1.5. Visibility and distinctness of a tuple name Any name that is defined as a tuple name is visible throughout the file, including before the definition. For instance, this means that: tuple swainsonsThrush bluebird; tuple bluebird (int i, char c); is legal Grouse-3 and results in swainsonsThrush being a name for the type t(int, char). This is also true of tuple names defined in a functionDefinition. Identifiers defined as a tuple name (or function name) may not be used for any other purpose throughout the file. It may not be shadowed. 1.6. Tuple creation Nontrivial tuples are created with fresh or copy. For example, fresh bluebird(14, ‘r) creates a new bluebird tuple with entries 14 and ’r. This works with the bluebird definition in sec. 1.5 to create a new tuple record with i=14 and c=’r. (This tuple record would have 14 bytes, with i stored at offset 9 + 0 and c at offset 9+4. (Here the 9’s denote the header size.) copy also works to copy a tuple type. For example: imm v := fresh bluebird(14, ‘r); imm w := copy v; But keep in mind that the argument to copy can be any expression that gives a tuple type. A nontrivial tuple can also be created when a function returns. With whistle declared as in section 1.3 : imm v := whistle(4, 10); results in v being of type t(char, char), and v being assigned to a tuple record of this type created by the function whistle. 1.7. Tuple entries The entries (subelements) of a tuple are mutable and targetable. They are expressed in grouse as expression . identifier where expression has a tuple type, and identifier is the name of a subelement of that tuple type. (This is the place where the names of the subelements of a tuple type matter.) Although turkey and duck above refer to equivalent types, they have different subelement names, so the following are illegal in Grouse-3 (assuming myTurkey is of type turkey): myTurkey.xy fresh duck(10, 4.317, 12).b On the other hand, the following are legal: myTurkey.c fresh duck(10, 4.317, 12).xy 1.8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assignment 6: Subtyping and Bidirectional Typing
    Assignment 6: Subtyping and Bidirectional Typing 15-312: Foundations of Programming Languages Joshua Dunfield ([email protected]) Out: Thursday, October 24, 2002 Due: Thursday, November 7 (11:59:59 pm) 100 points total + (up to) 20 points extra credit 1 Introduction In this assignment, you will implement a bidirectional typechecker for MinML with , , +, 1, 0, , , and subtyping with base types int and float. ! ∗ 8 9 Note: In the .sml files, most changes from Assignment 4 are indicated like this: (* new asst6 code: *) ... (* end asst6 code *) 2 New in this assignment Some things have become obsolete (and have either been removed or left • in a semi-supported state). Exceptions and continuations are no longer “officially” supported. One can now (and sometimes must!) write type annotations e : τ. The • abstract syntax constructor is called Anno. The lexer supports shell-style comments in .mml source files: any line • beginning with # is ignored. There are now two valid syntaxes for functions, the old syntax fun f (x:t1):t2 is e end • and a new syntax fun f(x) is e end. Note the lack of type anno- tations. The definition of the abstract syntax constructor Fun has been changed; its arguments are now just bindings for f and x and the body. It no longer takes two types. 1 The old syntax fun f(x:t1):t2 is e end is now just syntactic sugar, transformed by the parser into fun f(x) is e end : t1 -> t2. There are floating point numbers, written as in SML. There is a new set of • arithmetic operators +., -., *., ˜.
    [Show full text]
  • (901133) Instructor: Eng
    home Al-Albayt University Computer Science Department C++ Programming 1 (901133) Instructor: Eng. Rami Jaradat [email protected] 1 home Subjects 1. Introduction to C++ Programming 2. Control Structures 3. Functions 4. Arrays 5. Pointers 6. Strings 2 home 1 - Introduction to C++ Programming 3 home What is computer? • Computers are programmable devices capable of performing computations and making logical decisions. • Computers can store, retrieve, and process data according to a list of instructions • Hardware is the physical part of the compute: keyboard, screen, mouse, disks, memory, and processing units • Software is a collection of computer programs, procedures and documentation that perform some tasks on a computer system 4 home Computer Logical Units • Input unit – obtains information (data) from input devices • Output unit – outputs information to output device or to control other devices. • Memory unit – Rapid access, low capacity, stores information • Secondary storage unit – cheap, long-term, high-capacity storage, stores inactive programs • Arithmetic and logic unit (ALU) – performs arithmetic calculations and logic decisions • Central processing unit (CPU): – supervises and coordinates the other sections of the computer 5 home Computer language • Machine languages: machine dependent, it consists of strings of numbers giving machine specific instructions: +1300042774 +1400593419 +1200274027 • Assembly languages: English-like abbreviations representing elementary operations, assemblers convert assembly language to machine
    [Show full text]
  • Explicitly Implicifying Explicit Constructors
    Explicitly Implicifying explicit Constructors Document number: P1163R0 Date: 2018-08-31 Project: Programming Language C++, Library Working Group Reply-to: Nevin “☺” Liber, [email protected] or [email protected] Table of Contents Revision History ................................................................................................................ 3 P11630R0 .................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 Motivation and Scope ....................................................................................................... 5 Impact On the Standard ................................................................................................... 6 Policy .................................................................................................................................. 7 Design Decisions ................................................................................................................ 8 Technical Specifications ................................................................................................... 9 [template.bitset]........................................................................................................................ 10 [bitset.cons] ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cool Reference Manual∗
    The Cool Reference Manual∗ Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Getting Started 3 3 Classes 4 3.1 Features . 4 3.2 Inheritance . 5 4 Types 6 4.1 SELF TYPE ........................................... 6 4.2 Type Checking . 7 5 Attributes 8 5.1 Void................................................ 8 6 Methods 8 7 Expressions 9 7.1 Constants . 9 7.2 Identifiers . 9 7.3 Assignment . 9 7.4 Dispatch . 10 7.5 Conditionals . 10 7.6 Loops . 11 7.7 Blocks . 11 7.8 Let . 11 7.9 Case . 12 7.10 New . 12 7.11 Isvoid . 12 7.12 Arithmetic and Comparison Operations . 13 ∗Copyright c 1995-2000 by Alex Aiken. All rights reserved. 1 8 Basic Classes 13 8.1 Object . 13 8.2 IO ................................................. 13 8.3 Int................................................. 14 8.4 String . 14 8.5 Bool . 14 9 Main Class 14 10 Lexical Structure 14 10.1 Integers, Identifiers, and Special Notation . 15 10.2 Strings . 15 10.3 Comments . 15 10.4 Keywords . 15 10.5 White Space . 15 11 Cool Syntax 17 11.1 Precedence . 17 12 Type Rules 17 12.1 Type Environments . 17 12.2 Type Checking Rules . 18 13 Operational Semantics 22 13.1 Environment and the Store . 22 13.2 Syntax for Cool Objects . 24 13.3 Class definitions . 24 13.4 Operational Rules . 25 14 Acknowledgements 30 2 1 Introduction This manual describes the programming language Cool: the Classroom Object-Oriented Language. Cool is a small language that can be implemented with reasonable effort in a one semester course. Still, Cool retains many of the features of modern programming languages including objects, static typing, and automatic memory management.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Immutability and Nullity Types for an Imperative Object-Oriented Programming Language with flexible Initialization
    Generic Immutability and Nullity Types for an imperative object-oriented programming language with flexible initialization James Elford June 21, 2012 Abstract We present a type system for parametric object mutability and ref- erence nullity in an imperative object oriented language. We present a simple but powerful system for generic nullity constraints, and build on previous work to provide safe initialization of objects which is not bound to constructors. The system is expressive enough to handle initialization of cyclic immutable data structures, and to enforce their cyclic nature through the type system. We provide the crucial parts of soundness ar- guments (though the full proof is not yet complete). Our arguments are novel, in that they do not require auxiliary runtime constructs (ghost state) in order to express or demonstrate our desired properties. 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 In this document . .5 2 Background 6 2.1 Parametric Types . .6 2.1.1 Static Polymorphism through Templates . .7 2.1.2 Static Polymorphism through Generic Types . 12 2.2 Immutability . 18 2.2.1 Immutability in C++ .................... 19 2.2.2 Immutability in Java and C# ............... 21 2.2.3 An extension to Java's immutability model . 21 2.2.4 Parametric Immutability Constraints . 24 2.3 IGJ: Immutability Generic Java .................. 25 2.4 Nullity . 27 2.5 Areas of commonality . 30 3 Goals 32 4 Existing systems in more detail 34 4.1 The initialization problem . 34 4.2 What do we require from initialization? . 35 4.3 Approaches to initialization . 37 4.4 Delay Types and initialization using stack-local regions .
    [Show full text]
  • C DEFINES and C++ TEMPLATES Professor Ken Birman
    Professor Ken Birman C DEFINES AND C++ TEMPLATES CS4414 Lecture 10 CORNELL CS4414 - FALL 2020. 1 COMPILE TIME “COMPUTING” In lecture 9 we learned about const, constexpr and saw that C++ really depends heavily on these Ken’s solution to homework 2 runs about 10% faster with extensive use of these annotations Constexpr underlies the “auto” keyword and can sometimes eliminate entire functions by precomputing their results at compile time. Parallel C++ code would look ugly without normal code structuring. Const and constexpr allow the compiler to see “beyond” that and recognize parallelizable code paths. CORNELL CS4414 - FALL 2020. 2 … BUT HOW FAR CAN WE TAKE THIS IDEA? Today we will look at the concept of programming the compiler using the templating layer of C++ We will see that it is a powerful tool! There are also programmable aspects of Linux, and of the modern hardware we use. By controlling the whole system, we gain speed and predictability while writing elegant, clean code. CORNELL CS4414 - FALL 2020. 3 IDEA MAP FOR TODAY History of generics: #define in C Templates are easy to create, if you stick to basics The big benefit compared to Java is that a template We have seen a number of parameterized is a compile-time construct, whereas in Java a generic types in C++, like std::vector and std::map is a run-time construct. The template language is Turing-complete, but computes These are examples of “templates”. only on types, not data from the program (even when They are like generics in Java constants are provided).
    [Show full text]
  • Class Notes on Type Inference 2018 Edition Chuck Liang Hofstra University Computer Science
    Class Notes on Type Inference 2018 edition Chuck Liang Hofstra University Computer Science Background and Introduction Many modern programming languages that are designed for applications programming im- pose typing disciplines on the construction of programs. In constrast to untyped languages such as Scheme/Perl/Python/JS, etc, and weakly typed languages such as C, a strongly typed language (C#/Java, Ada, F#, etc ...) place constraints on how programs can be written. A type system ensures that programs observe logical structure. The origins of type theory stretches back to the early twentieth century in the work of Bertrand Russell and Alfred N. Whitehead and their \Principia Mathematica." They observed that our language, if not restrained, can lead to unsolvable paradoxes. Specifically, let's say a mathematician defined S to be the set of all sets that do not contain themselves. That is: S = fall A : A 62 Ag Then it is valid to ask the question does S contain itself (S 2 S?). If the answer is yes, then by definition of S, S is one of the 'A's, and thus S 62 S. But if S 62 S, then S is one of those sets that do not contain themselves, and so it must be that S 2 S! This observation is known as Russell's Paradox. In order to avoid this paradox, the language of mathematics (or any language for that matter) must be constrained so that the set S cannot be defined. This is one of many discoveries that resulted from the careful study of language, logic and meaning that formed the foundation of twentieth century analytical philosophy and abstract mathematics, and also that of computer science.
    [Show full text]
  • C Programming Tutorial
    C Programming Tutorial C PROGRAMMING TUTORIAL Simply Easy Learning by tutorialspoint.com tutorialspoint.com i COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER NOTICE All the content and graphics on this tutorial are the property of tutorialspoint.com. Any content from tutorialspoint.com or this tutorial may not be redistributed or reproduced in any way, shape, or form without the written permission of tutorialspoint.com. Failure to do so is a violation of copyright laws. This tutorial may contain inaccuracies or errors and tutorialspoint provides no guarantee regarding the accuracy of the site or its contents including this tutorial. If you discover that the tutorialspoint.com site or this tutorial content contains some errors, please contact us at [email protected] ii Table of Contents C Language Overview .............................................................. 1 Facts about C ............................................................................................... 1 Why to use C ? ............................................................................................. 2 C Programs .................................................................................................. 2 C Environment Setup ............................................................... 3 Text Editor ................................................................................................... 3 The C Compiler ............................................................................................ 3 Installation on Unix/Linux ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 Pointers
    2.2 Pointers 1 Department of CSE Objectives • To understand the need and application of pointers • To learn how to declare a pointer and how it is represented in memory • To learn the relation between arrays and pointers • To study the need for call-by-reference • To distinguish between some special types of pointers 2 Department of CSE Agenda • Basics of Pointers • Declaration and Memory Representation • Operators associated with pointers • address of operator • dereferencing operator • Arrays and Pointers. • Compatibility of pointers • Functions and Pointers • Special types of pointers • void pointer • null pointer • constant pointers • dangling pointers • pointer to pointer 3 Department of CSE Introduction • A pointer is defined as a variable whose value is the address of another variable. • It is mandatory to declare a pointer before using it to store any variable address. 4 Department of CSE Pointer Declaration • General form of a pointer variable declaration:- datatype *ptrname; • Eg:- • int *p; (p is a pointer that can point only integer variables) • float *fp; (fp can point only floating-point variables) • Actual data type of the value of all pointers is a long hexadecimal number that represents a memory address 5 Department of CSE Initialization of Pointer Variable • Uninitialized pointers will have some unknown memory address in them. • Initialize/ Assign a valid memory address to the pointer. Initialization Assignment int a; int a; int *p = &a; int *p; p = &a; • The variable should be defined before pointer. • Initializing pointer to NULL int *p = NULL; 6 Department of CSE Why Pointers? • Manages memory more efficiently. • Leads to more compact and efficient code than that can be obtained in other ways • One way to have a function modify the actual value of a variable passed to it.
    [Show full text]
  • IDENTIFYING PROGRAMMING IDIOMS in C++ GENERIC LIBRARIES a Thesis Submitted to Kent State University in Partial Fulfillment of Th
    IDENTIFYING PROGRAMMING IDIOMS IN C++ GENERIC LIBRARIES A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science by Ryan Holeman December, 2009 Thesis written by Ryan Holeman B.S., Kent State University, USA 2007 M.S., Kent State University, USA 2009 Approved by Jonathan I. Maletic, Advisor Robert A. Walker, Chair, Department of Computer Science John Stalvey, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................VI LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... X DEDICATION.................................................................................................................XI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... XII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 1 1.1 Motivation ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Research Contributions ............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Organization .............................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2 RELATED WORK...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The RPC Abstraction
    The RPC abstraction • Procedure calls well-understood mechanism - Transfer control and data on single computer • Goal: Make distributed programming look same - Code libraries provide APIs to access functionality - Have servers export interfaces accessible through local APIs • Implement RPC through request-response protocol - Procedure call generates network request to server - Server return generates response Interface Definition Languages • Idea: Specify RPC call and return types in IDL • Compile interface description with IDL compiler. Output: - Native language types (e.g., C/Java/C++ structs/classes) - Code to marshal (serialize) native types into byte streams - Stub routines on client to forward requests to server • Stub routines handle communication details - Helps maintain RPC transparency, but - Still had to bind client to a particular server - Still need to worry about failures Intro to SUN RPC • Simple, no-frills, widely-used RPC standard - Does not emulate pointer passing or distributed objects - Programs and procedures simply referenced by numbers - Client must know server—no automatic location - Portmap service maps program #s to TCP/UDP port #s • IDL: XDR – eXternal Data Representation - Compilers for multiple languages (C, java, C++) Sun XDR • “External Data Representation” - Describes argument and result types: struct message { int opcode; opaque cookie[8]; string name<255>; }; - Types can be passed across the network • Libasync rpcc compiles to C++ - Converts messages to native data structures - Generates marshaling routines (struct $ byte stream) - Generates info for stub routines Basic data types • int var – 32-bit signed integer - wire rep: big endian (0x11223344 ! 0x11, 0x22, 0x33, 0x44) - rpcc rep: int32 t var • hyper var – 64-bit signed integer - wire rep: big endian - rpcc rep: int64 t var • unsigned int var, unsigned hyper var - wire rep: same as signed - rpcc rep: u int32 t var, u int64 t var More basic types • void – No data - wire rep: 0 bytes of data • enum {name = constant,.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Modern Exception Handling Trendy We
    Computer Science • Vol. 5 • 2003 Marcin Kuta* TRENDS IN M ODERN EXCEPTION HANDLING Exception handling is nowadays a necessary cornponent of error proof Information systems. The paper presents overview of techni ues and models of exception handling, problems con- nected with them and potential Solutions. The aspects of implementation of propagation mechanisms and exception handling, their effect on semantics and genera program efhcJen- cy are also taken into account. Presented mechanisms were adopted to modern programming languages. Considering design area, formal methods and formal verihcation of program pro- perties we can notice exception handling mechanisms are weakly present what makes a field for futur research. Keywords: exception handling, exception propagation, resumption model, terrnination model TRENDY WE WSPÓŁCZESNEJ OBSŁUDZE WYJĄ TKÓW Obs uga wyj tków jest wspó cze nie nieodzownym sk adnikiem systemów informatycznych odpornych na b dy. W artykule przedstawiono przegl d technik i modeli obs ugi b dów, zwi zane z nimi problemy oraz ich potencjalne rozwi zania. Uwzgl dniono równie zagad nienia dotycz ce implementacji mechanizmów propagacji i obs ugi b dów, ich wp yw na semantyk oraz ogóln efektywno programów. Przedstawione mechanizmy znalaz y zasto sowanie we wspó czesnych j zykach programowania. Je li chodzi o dziedzin projektowania, metody formalne oraz formalne dowodzenie w asno ci, to mechanizmy obs ugi wyj tków nie s w nich dostatecznie reprezentowane, co stanowi pole dla nowych bada . Słowa kluczowe: obs uga b dów, progagacja wyj tków, semantyka wznawiania, semantyka zako czenia 1. Int roduct ion Analysing modern Computer systems we notice increasing efforts to deal with problem of software reliability.
    [Show full text]