Theories of Stockbroker and Brokerage Firm Liability

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Theories of Stockbroker and Brokerage Firm Liability Theories of Stockbroker and Brokerage Firm Liability ver a lifetime, even modest savings, contributions to an IRA, or partici- By Robert C. Port pation in an employee pension plan can result in significant accumula- O tions of wealth.1 However, many individuals have neither the interest nor the desire to learn about financial markets and investments, nor do they have the time necessary to monitor their investments on an ongoing basis. Their aversion to and confusion about financial matters has been further accentuated by the “irrational exu- berance”2 of the “Internet bubble” of the late 1990s, and subsequent significant decline in the value of technology and telecommunications stock. As a result, many individuals turn to stockbrokers, investment advisors, financial planners, insurance agents, and oth- ers claiming to have the knowledge and experience to offer investment advice. Stockbrokers and other financial advisors are highly motivated to cultivate their clients’ trust and allegiance, and clients who lack knowledge and sophistication on financial matters have powerful incentives to believe that such advisors are trust- worthy and acting solely in the customer’s best interests.3 This trusting relationship creates an opportunity for exploitation by the advisor, which may form the basis for a vari- ety of legal claims. Common fact patterns associated with broker misconduct include mis- representation, churn- ing, unsuitable recom- mendations, unautho- rized trading, and fail- ure to supervise. Outright misrepresenta- tion and fraud may also be practiced on the unsuspecting and trust- ing client. Federal and state securities statutes and state common law typi- 12 Georgia Bar Journal cally govern civil liability in con- ates or would operate as a fraud inexcusable negligence, but an nection with losses arising from the or deceit upon any person, in extreme departure from the stan- purchase and sale of securities. The connection with the purchase or dards of ordinary care, and that self-regulatory rules of the sale of any security.6 present a danger of misleading National Association of Securities The essential elements of a Rule buyers or sellers which is either Dealers and the New York Stock 10b-5 claim are: (1) a misstatement known to the defendant or is so Exchange are also relevant to the or omission; (2) of a material fact; (3) obvious that the defendant must issue of whether a broker or finan- made with scienter, (4) upon which have been aware of it.”15 cial advisor owed or breached a the plaintiff relied; (5) that proxi- The plaintiff’s reliance must have duty to the customer. The follow- mately caused the plaintiff’s loss.7 been reasonable or justified.16 ing is a brief overview of common The standard for determining Relevant factors include: (1) the legal theories of liability that apply materiality is whether “there is a sophistication and expertise of the to broker misconduct.4 substantial likelihood that a reason- plaintiff in financial and security able shareholder would consider it matters; (2) the existence of long FRAUDULENT MIS- important” or “a substantial likeli- standing business or personal rela- REPRESENTATIONS hood that the disclosure of the omit- tionships between the plaintiff and ted fact would have been viewed by the defendant; (3) the plaintiff’s AND OMISSIONS the reasonable investor as having access to relevant information; (4) Material misrepresentations and significantly altered the ‘total mix’ the existence of a fiduciary relation- 8 omissions made in connection with of information made available.” ship owed by the defendant to the the purchase or sale of a security can “To constitute fraud, a misrepre- plaintiff, (5) concealment of fraud by violate federal and state securities sentation generally must relate to the defendant; (6) whether the plain- 9 statutes. Such claims may also pro- an existing or pre-existing fact.” A tiff initiated the stock transaction or ceed as common law fraud claims. misrepresentation of future profit sought to expedite the transaction; generally cannot constitute fraud, and (8) the generality or specificity Section 10(b) of the as it is a type of opinion and predic- of the misrepresentations.17 Securities Exchange Act tion of future events.10 “[O]utra- To prove the causation element, of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 geous generalized statements, not a plaintiff must prove both “trans- making specific claims, that are so action causation” and “loss causa- Section 10 of the Securities exaggerated as to preclude reliance tion.”18 Transaction causation is a Exchange Act of 1934,5 is an anti- by consumers” generally will be synonym for reliance, and is estab- fraud provision prohibiting the use deemed “puffing” rather than lished when the misrepresentations “in connection with the purchase fraud.11 Furthermore, the “in con- or omissions cause the plaintiff “to or sale of any security . any nection with” requirement in Rule engage in the transaction in ques- manipulative or deceptive device 10b-5 is not satisfied by any misrep- tion.”19 Loss causation is more dif- or contrivance.” Rule 10b-5 prom- resentations or omissions that occur ficult to prove: the misrepresenta- ulgated by the Securities Exchange after the claimant purchases or sells tion must have caused the loss suf- Commission amplifies these prohi- the security in question.12 fered by the claimant. Loss causa- bitions by making it unlawful: The Supreme Court has express- tion is satisfied “only if the misrep- (a) To employ any device, ly left open the question of whether resentation touches upon the rea- scheme, or artifice to defraud, the scienter requirement encom- sons for the investment’s decline in (b) To make any untrue state- passes not only intentional con- value.”20 Proof of loss causation is a ment of a material fact or to omit duct, but also reckless conduct.13 statutory requirement.21 to state a material fact necessary The rule in the 11th Circuit is that a in order to make the statements Section 12(2) of the showing of “severe recklessness” made, in the light of the circum- satisfies the scienter requirement.14 Securities Act of 1933 stances under which they were “Severe recklessness is limited to Section 12(2) of the Securities made, not misleading, or (c) To those highly unreasonable omis- Exchange Act of 1933 provides that engage in any act, practice, or sions or misrepresentations that any person who offers or sells a course of business which oper- involve not merely simple or even security by use of an oral or written April 2004 13 communication that contains an ments made, in the light of the cir- municate. “The obligation to com- untrue statement of material fact or cumstances under which they are municate may arise from the confi- omits to state a material fact neces- made, not misleading.”25 Liability dential relations of the parties or sary in order to make the statement will not be found however, if “(1) from the particular circumstances not misleading is liable to the pur- [t]he purchaser knew of the untrue of the case.”32 Under Georgia law, chaser, unless the seller can show statement of a material fact or omis- “a confidential relationship impos- that he did not know and in the sion of a statement of a material fact; es a greater duty on the parties to exercise of reasonable care could or (2) [t]he seller did not know and reveal what should be revealed, not have known of the untruth or in the exercise of reasonable care and a lessened duty to discover omission.22 Scienter is not an ele- could not have known of the untrue independently what could have ment of a Section 12(2) claim. statement or misleading omission.”26 been discovered through the exer- Although the scope of liability The remedies provided under the cise of ordinary care.”33 under Section 12(2) is potentially Georgia Act are available only to a Not all representations by a bro- broad, its reach for broker miscon- buyer of securities.27 Because there ker are actionable by an investor. duct nonetheless is limited by four is very little case law construing the For example, an investor is not jus- factors. First, the claimant is limited Georgia Securities Act, the courts tified in relying upon representa- to rescission or rescessionary dam- often look to analogous federal tions consisting of mere expres- ages (the purchase price of the secu- statutes for interpretive assistance. sions of opinion, hope, expectation rity, plus interest, less income For example, although the language and puffing.34 Thus, speculations received thereon) and must tender of the Georgia statute does not or puffing as to future performance the security back to the seller. If the appear to require scienter, courts and statements that a particular claimant no longer owns the securi- have construed the section in accor- security is a “safe investment” are ty, he may seek damages represent- dance with Rule 10b-5 as requiring generally not actionable.35 ing the difference in the purchase proof of scienter.28 One of the price and the sale price. Second, only advantages of a claimant proceeding CHURNING purchasers may assert claims under under the Georgia Act, however, is “Churning occurs when a securi- Section 12(2), and they may assert provision for recovery of attorney’s ties broker buys and sells securities 29 them only against sellers and per- fees, interest, and court costs. for a customer’s account, without sons who control them. A “seller” is Common Law Fraud regard to the customer’s investment one who either transfers title to the interests, for the purpose of generat- Under Georgia law, fraud is security or who solicits the sale and ing commissions.”36 Churning is a shown when (i) a representation of receives a benefit from doing so or violation of Section 10(b) of the material fact is made (or there is a acts with the intent to benefit the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 23 failure to disclose a material fact); owner of the security.
Recommended publications
  • Defenses to Customer Claims Against Stockbrokers
    DEFENSES TO CUSTOMER CLAIMS AGAINST STOCKBROKERS Elizabeth Hoop Fay, Esquire Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Philadelphia Foster S. Goldman, Jr., Esquire Markel Schafer & Goldman, PC Pittsburgh DEFENSES TO CUSTOMER CLAIMS AGAINST STOCKBROKERS I. DEFENSES TO CHURNING, SUITABILITY AND UNAUTHORIZED TRADING CLAIMS A. The Elements of Causes of Action for Churning, Unsuitable Recommendations and Unauthorized Trading 1. Churning of a brokerage account occurs when a broker who exercises control over the trading engages in an excessive number of transactions in order to generate commissions. See, e.g., Costello v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 711 F.2d 1361, 1368-69 (7th Cir. 1983). To prevail on a churning claim, the customer must prove three elements: (1) control of the account by the broker; (2) trading activity that is excessive in light of the customer’s investment objectives; and (3) that the broker acted with scienter, i.e., intent to defraud or reckless disregard of the customer’s interests. Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co., 899 F.2d 485, 489 (6th Cir. 1990). 2. While a churning claim is a challenge to the quantity of transactions, a suitability claim challenges the quality of the investments recommended by the broker. To prevail on a suitability claim, the customer generally must prove: (1) that the broker recommended securities that are unsuitable in light of the customer’s investment objectives; and (2) that the broker did so with intent to defraud or with reckless disregard for the client’s interests. E.g., Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group Inc., 991 F.2d 1020, 1031 (2d Cir. 1991). 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ladies of the Ticker
    By George Robb During the late 19th century, a growing number of women were finding employ- ment in banking and insurance, but not on Wall Street. Probably no area of Amer- ican finance offered fewer job opportuni- ties to women than stock broking. In her 1863 survey, The Employments of Women, Virginia Penny, who was usually eager to promote new fields of employment for women, noted with approval that there were no women stockbrokers in the United States. Penny argued that “women could not very well conduct the busi- ness without having to mix promiscuously with men on the street, and stop and talk to them in the most public places; and the delicacy of woman would forbid that.” The radical feminist Victoria Woodhull did not let delicacy stand in her way when she and her sister opened a brokerage house near Wall Street in 1870, but she paid a heavy price for her audacity. The scandals which eventually drove Wood- hull out of business and out of the country cast a long shadow over other women’s careers as brokers. Histories of Wall Street rarely mention women brokers at all. They might note Victoria Woodhull’s distinction as the nation’s first female stockbroker, but they don’t discuss the subject again until they reach the 1960s. This neglect is unfortu- nate, as it has left generations of pioneering Wall Street women hidden from history. These extraordinary women struggled to establish themselves professionally and to overcome chauvinistic prejudice that a career in finance was unfeminine. Ladies When Mrs. M.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Operations of a Typical Stockbroker and an Issuing House
    THE OPERATIONS OF A TYPICAL STOCKBROKER AND AN ISSUING HOUSE A PAPER PRESENTED BY MR. AZU ODITA GENERAL MANAGER/CEO, NETWORTH SECURITIES & FINANCE LIMITED (A MEMBER OF THE NIGERIAN STOCK EXCHANGE) LAGOS, NIGERIA Outline Who is a Stockbroker Requirements of a Stockbroker Services offered by a Stockbroker Relationship with other Stakeholders in the capital market Who is a Stockbroker A licensed dealing member of an Exchange Ø To deal in financial instruments available in the Money & Capital Markets uPrimary activity is in the capital market Dealing firms are the principal while the Authorized dealing clerks are the brokers/agents of the dealing firms Other features Ø Registered with CAC and SEC Ø Roles in the market depend on Capital bases, Expertise and Status of Registration u Broker = N40 Million u Dealer = N30 Million u Broker/Dealer = N70 Million – A broker transacts on behalf of customers only while a dealer transacts on behalf of his company Requirements of a Stockbroker ØIntegrity – His Word is his Bond ØInnovation in value-added services e.g. Margin Trading, Security Lending, REPO transactions ØKnow your Client (KYC) ØExcellent Analytical Skill ØFinancial Training ØFund Management & Administration ØFinancial Supermarket - gain advantage of size & distribution network ØOffshore Alliance. Services Offered by A Stockbroking Firm Not standardised Ø Differs from one organisation to another Examples Stockbroking New Issues Research & Portfolio Management Bond Trading Credit Analysis Stockbroking Receives and process transaction orders
    [Show full text]
  • Semi Annual Report April 2008
    FEDERATION OF EURO-ASIAN STOCK EXCHANGES SEMI ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2008 FEDERATION OF EURO-ASIAN STOCK EXCHANGES SEMI ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Federation of Euro-Asian Stock Exchanges 3 Deutsche Boerse 10 Garanti Asset Management 13 Is Investment 14 NASDAQ OMX 16 Tayburn Kurumsal 18 Finans Asset Management 20 Quartal FLife 21 Stock Exchange Profiles Abu Dhabi Securities Market 24 Amman Stock Exchange 28 Armenian Stock Exchange 32 Bahrain Stock Exchange 36 Baku Interbank Currency Exchange 40 Baku Stock Exchange 44 Banja Luka Stock Exchange 46 Belarusian Currency and Stock Exchange 50 Belgrade Stock Exchange 54 Bucharest Stock Exchange 58 Bulgarian Stock Exchange 62 Cairo and Alexandria Stock Exchanges 66 Georgian Stock Exchange 70 Iraq Stock Exchange 74 Istanbul Stock Exchange 78 Karachi Stock Exchange 82 Kazakhstan Stock Exchange 86 Kyrgyz Stock Exchange 90 Lahore Stock Exchange 94 Macedonian Stock Exchange 96 Moldovan Stock Exchange 100 Mongolian Stock Exchange 104 Montenegro Stock Exchange 108 Muscat Securities Market 112 Palestine Securities Exchange 116 Sarajevo Stock Exchange 120 State Commodity & Raw Materials Exchange of Turkmenistan 122 Tehran Stock Exchange 126 Tirana Stock Exchange 130 “Toshkent” Republican Stock Exchange 134 Ukrainian Stock Exchange 138 Zagreb Stock Exchange 142 Affiliate Member Profiles CDA Central Depository of Armenia 147 Central Registry Agency Inc. of Turkey 148 Central Securities Depository of Iran 149 Macedonian Central Securities Depository 150 Misr For Clearing, Settlement & Central Depository 151 Securities Depository Center (SDC) of Jordan 152 Takasbank - ISE Settlement and Custody Bank, Inc. 153 Tehran Securities Exchange Technology Management Company (TSETMC) 154 Member List 155 FEDERATION OF EURO-ASIAN STOCK EXCHANGES (FEAS) The Federation of Euro-Asian Stock Exchanges Semi Annual Report April 2008 is published by the Federation of Euro-Asian Stock I.M.K.B Building, Emirgan 34467 Istanbul, Turkey Exchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Professional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: an Antidote for Bubbles?
    Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2002 The rP ofessional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: An Antidote for Bubbles? Steven A. Ramirez Loyola University Chicago, School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Ramirez, Steven, The rP ofessional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: An Antidote for Bubbles? 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 527 (2002) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF SECURITIES BROKERS UNDER FEDERAL LAW: AN ANTIDOTE FOR BUBBLES? Steven A. Ramirez* I. INTRODUCTION In the wake of the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed legislation specifically designed to extend greater protection to the investing public and to elevate business practices within the securities brokerage industry.' This legislative initiative ultimately gave birth to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the '34 Act).' The '34 Act represented the first large scale regulation of the nation's public securities markets. Up until that time, the securities brokerage industry4 had been left to regulate itself (through various private stock exchanges). This system of * Professor of Law, Washburn University School of Law. Professor William Rich caused me to write this Article by arranging a Faculty Scholarship Forum at Washburn University in the'Spring of 2001 and asking me to participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrip Dividend in the Form of New Shares
    Your responsibilities Principal register Hong Kong Overseas Branch register THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are Computershare Investor Services PLC Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited in any doubt about this document or as to the action you should take, you should consult a Whether or not it is to your advantage to elect to receive new shares in lieu of a cash The Pavilions Rooms 1712-1716, 17th Floor stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other appropriate independent professional adviser. dividend or to elect to receive payment in US dollars, sterling or Hong Kong dollars Bridgwater Road Hopewell Centre If you sold or transferred all or some of your ordinary shares on or before 15 May 2019, but those is a matter for individual decision by each shareholder. HSBC cannot accept any Bristol 183 Queen’s Road East shares are included in the number shown in box 1 on your form of election or entitlement advice for responsibility for your decision. BS99 6ZZ Hong Kong SAR the first interim dividend for 2019, you should, without delay, consult the stockbroker or other agent United Kingdom Telephone: +852 2862 8555 through whom the sale or transfer was effected for advice on the action you should take. Overseas shareholders Telephone: +44 (0) 370 702 0137 Email: [email protected] Email via website: Investor Centre: Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this document, make no representation as to its accuracy or No person receiving a copy of this document or the form of election in any jurisdiction www.investorcentre.co.uk/contactus www.investorcentre.com/hk Investor Centre: completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited but Not Lost: a Comment on the ECJ's Golden Share Decisions
    Fordham Law Review Volume 72 Issue 5 Article 35 2004 Limited But Not Lost: A Comment on the ECJ's Golden Share Decisions Christine O'Grady Putek Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Christine O'Grady Putek, Limited But Not Lost: A Comment on the ECJ's Golden Share Decisions, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 2219 (2004). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol72/iss5/35 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENT LIMITED BUT NOT LOST: A COMMENT ON THE ECJ'S GOLDEN SHARE DECISIONS Christine O'Grady Putek* INTRODUCTION Consider the following scenario:' Remo is a large industrialized nation with a widget manufacturer, Well-Known Co. ("WK") which has a strong international reputation, and is uniquely identified with Remo. WK is an important provider of jobs in southern Remo. Because of WK's importance to Remo, for both economic and national pride reasons, Remo has a special law (the "WK law"), which gives the government of southern Remo a degree of control over WK, all in the name of protection of the company from unwanted foreign takeovers and of other national interests, such as employment. The law caps the number of voting shares that any one investor may own, and gives the government of Southern Remo influence over key company decisions by allowing it to appoint half the board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Selecting a Stockbroker Or Investment Adviser
    Assessing Your Needs Before you seek the services of a professional stockbroker or investment adviser, take some ti me to evaluate your Selecting needs and expectati ons. This analysis will help you choose the right person a Stockbroker for the job. or • Defi ne Your Goals Securiti es Division Short- and long-term goals need to be The Securities Division of the Secretary of Investment identified. Determine the degree of risk State’s Office is responsible for regulating you are willing to assume to achieve the offer and sale of certain types of Adviser your fi nancial goals. investments known as securities. These may include many types of stocks, bonds, limited partnerships, viatical sett lement investment • Determine Your Net Worth contracts, some oil and gas investments, Figure out your assets and liabiliti es -- and other investment contracts. what you own and what you owe. Be sure Our major activities include registration to take into account any growing debts, of securities offerings, the licensing of likely tax increases, or personal or health stockbrokers and investment advisers, and crises which may strain fi nances. the investigati on of alleged violati ons of the securiti es laws. • Anticipate Life Changes Please call us with any questi ons at Consider any plans which might have an 601-359-1334. Mississippi residents may impact on your fi nances, such as making a also reach us by calling toll-free at career change, having children, paying school 888-236-6167. tuiti on or reti ring. Securities Division P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 601-359-1334 www.sos.ms.gov Dear Fellow Mississippians: Selecting Your Adviser To select the best Be sure to look for certain characteristics and qualifications when choosing someone to manage financial adviser, you your investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Public Offering Allocations
    Initial Public Offering Allocations by Sturla Lyngnes Fjesme A dissertation submitted to BI Norwegian Business School for the degree of PhD PhD specialization: Financial Economics Series of Dissertations 9/2011 BI Norwegian Business School Sturla Lyngnes Fjesme Initial Public Offering Allocations © Sturla Lyngnes Fjesme 2011 Series of Dissertations 9/2011 ISBN: 978-82-8247-029-2 ISSN: 1502-2099 BI Norwegian Business School N-0442 Oslo Phone: +47 4641 0000 www.bi.no Printing: Nordberg Trykk The dissertation may be downloaded or ordered from our website www.bi.no/en/Research/Research-Publications/ Abstract Stock exchanges have rules on the minimum equity level and the minimum number of shareholders that are required to list publicly. Most private companies that want to list publicly must issue equity to be able to meet these minimum requirements. Most companies that list on the Oslo stock exchange (OSE) are restricted to selling shares in an IPO to a large group of dispersed investors or in a negotiated private placement to a small group of specialized investors. Initial equity offerings have high expected returns and this makes them very popular investments. Ritter (2003) and Jenkinson and Jones (2004) argue that there are three views on how shares are allocated in the IPO setting. First, is the academic view based on Benveniste and Spindt (1989). In this view investment banks allocate IPO shares to informed investors in return for true valuation and demand information. Informed investors are allocated shares because they help to price the issue. Second, is the pitchbook view where investment banks allocate shares to institutional investors that are likely to hold shares in the long run.
    [Show full text]
  • The Underpricing of Ipos on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius
    The underpricing of IPOs on the stock exchange of Mauritius Article Accepted Version Agathee, U. S., Sannassee, R. V. and Brooks, C. (2012) The underpricing of IPOs on the stock exchange of Mauritius. Research in International Business and Finance, 26. pp. 281- 303. ISSN 0275-5319 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2012.01.001 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/26244/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2012.01.001 Publisher: Elsevier All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Research in International Business and Finance. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Research in International Business and Finance, 26.2 (2012), DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2012.01.001 € The Underpricing of IPOs on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius Ushad Subadar Agathee Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Law and Management, University of Mauritius.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Stockbrokers
    The Role of Stockbrokers • Stockbrokers • Act as intermediaries between buyers and sellers of securities • Typically paid by commissions • Must be licensed by SEC and securities exchanges where they place orders • Client places order, stockbroker sends order to brokerage firms, who executes order on the exchanges where firm owns seats Types of Brokerage Firms • Full-Service Broker • Offers broad range of services and products • Provides research and investment advice • Examples: Merrill Lynch, A.G. Edwards • Premium Discount Broker • Low commissions • Limited research or investment advice • Examples: Charles Schwab Types of Brokerage Firms (cont’d) • Basic Discount Brokers • Main focus is executing trades electronically online • No research or investment advice • Commissions are at deep-discount Selecting a Stockbroker • Find someone who understands your investment goals • Consider the investing style and goals of your stockbroker • Be prepared to pay higher fees for advice and help from full-service brokers • Ask for referrals from friends or business associates • Beware of churning: increasing commissions by causing excessive trading of clients’ accounts Table 3.5 Major Full-Service, Premium Discount, and Basic Discount Brokers Types of Brokerage Accounts • Custodial Account: brokerage account for a minor that requires parent or guardian to handle transactions • Cash Account: brokerage account that can only make cash transactions • Margin Account: brokerage account in which the brokerage firms extends borrowing privileges • Wrap Account:
    [Show full text]
  • Broker-Dealer Registration and FINRA Membership Application
    Broker-Dealer Concepts Broker-Dealer Registration and FINRA Membership Application Published by the Broker-Dealer & Investment Management Regulation Group September 2011 Following is an overview of the federal, state and self-regulatory organization (“SRO”) requirements for registration and qualification as a broker-dealer in the United States. We also discuss certain considerations relevant to the decision to register a broker-dealer with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”), application for membership in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and other SROs, state registration and related costs. I. Jurisdiction .........................................................................................................................................................2 II. Exclusions from Registration.............................................................................................................................2 III. Broker-Dealer Registration and SRO Membership..........................................................................................2 A. SEC Registration .......................................................................................................................................... 2 B. FINRA and Other SRO Membership ............................................................................................................ 3 C. State Registration ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]