DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Public Offerings 2020 Fourth Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Public Offerings 2020 Fourth Edition Initial Public Offerings 2020 Fourth Edition Contributing Editors: Ilir Mujalovic & Harald Halbhuber With contributions by: Global Legal Insights Initial Public Offerings 2020, Fourth Edition Contributing Editors: Ilir Mujalovic & Harald Halbhuber Published by Global Legal Group GLOBAL LEGAL INSIGHTS – INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS 2020, FOURTH EDITION Contributing Editors Ilir Mujalovic & Harald Halbhuber, Shearman & Sterling LLP Head of Production Suzie Levy Senior Editor Sam Friend Sub Editor Megan Hylton Group Publisher Rory Smith Creative Director Fraser Allan We are extremely grateful for all contributions to this edition. Special thanks are reserved for Ilir Mujalovic & Harald Halbhuber of Shearman & Sterling LLP for all of their assistance. Published by Global Legal Group Ltd. 59 Tanner Street, London SE1 3PL, United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 367 0720 / URL: www.glgroup.co.uk Copyright © 2020 Global Legal Group Ltd. All rights reserved No photocopying ISBN 978-1-83918-047-7 ISSN 2399-9594 This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualified professional when dealing with specific situations. The information contained herein is accurate as of the date of publication. CONTENTS Preface Ilir Mujalovic & Harald Halbhuber, Shearman & Sterling LLP Foreword Aseel M. Rabie, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) 1 General chapter Going public in the USA: An overview of the regulatory framework and capital markets process for IPOs, Ilir Mujalovic, Harald Halbhuber & Ana Aur, Shearman & Sterling LLP 6 Country chapters Australia Daniel Scotti & Nicole Sloggett, MinterEllison 26 Brazil Daniela Anversa, Veirano Advogados 38 China Shiwei Zhang, Zhong Lun Law Firm 49 Cyprus Demetris Roti, Yiota Georgiou & Rafaella Michail, Elias Neocleous & Co LLC 58 Finland Maria Lehtimäki, Niko Markkanen & Emilia Saloranta, Waselius & Wist 66 France Hervé Letréguilly & Séverine de La Courtie, Shearman & Sterling LLP 75 Germany Dr. Martin Steinbach & Dr. Mauritz C. Mann, Ernst & Young 88 Greece Nikos E. Pimblis & Nikos O. Xenoyiannis, Papadimitriou – Pimblis & Partners 99 Hong Kong Angel Wong & David Zhang, ONC Lawyers 108 Hungary Márton Kovács, Áron Kanti & Bálint Juhász, HBK Partners Attorneys at Law 118 India Arka Mookerjee & Pracheta Bhattacharya, J. Sagar Associates 127 Indonesia Barli Darsyah, Indrawan Darsyah Santoso, Attorneys At Law 139 Italy Marco Lantelme, BSVA Studio Legale Associato 152 Japan Toshimitsu Nemoto, Suguru Miyata, Kengo Ozaki & Tetsuya Tamura, Mori Hamada & Matsumoto 165 Korea Joo Hyoung Jang, Jisoo Yoo & Ji Hyun Youn, Barun Law LLC 178 Morocco Kamal Habachi & Salima Bakouchi, Bakouchi & Habachi – HB Law Firm LLP 189 Portugal Eduardo Paulino, Margarida Torres Gama & Inês Magalhães Correia, Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva & Associados 200 Singapore Wee Woon Hong, Opal Lawyers LLC 212 Switzerland Dr. Alexander von Jeinsen & Annette Weber, Bär & Karrer Ltd. 223 United Kingdom Pawel J. Szaja & Michael Scargill, Shearman & Sterling (London) LLP 234 PREFACE e are pleased to present the fourth edition of Global Legal Insights – WInitial Public Offerings. An initial public offering is a key way for companies to raise capital in the global capital markets and list their shares for public trading. Although IPOs are conceptually similar whether made to investors in New York, London or Hong Kong, or in other long-established or newer markets around the world, the regulatory frameworks, market practices, investor communities and subsequent public-company obligations are far from homogenous across jurisdictions. The Initial Public Offerings book provides general counsels, investment bankers, lawyers, business professionals, the investing community and other advisers and interested parties with a detailed overview of the key steps, legal issues and market practices involved in the initial public offering process by examining practices in 21 jurisdictions around the world, with two general chapters focusing on the United States. Leading practitioners from each jurisdiction provide their expertise and guidance on navigating their local market practices and regulatory framework. Each chapter follows a similar structure: introduction of the IPO market in the relevant jurisdiction; description of the IPO process and key parties; discussion of the relevant regulators and key regulations; public company responsibilities; and potential risks, liabilities and pitfalls. We hope you find the book will equip you with an understanding of the legal and market fundamentals necessary for a successful IPO. Ilir Mujalovic & Harald Halbhuber, Shearman & Sterling LLP Foreword Aseel M. Rabie Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Introduction Equity markets are the public face of finance and are often seen as a barometer of the overall health of the economy. In that sense, a thriving market for new issues of publicly offered equity securities, or the initial public offering (IPO) market, is perhaps the most direct and tangible evidence of an economy where new businesses have confidence in their future prospects. Businesses most often seek to access a larger pool of public capital to allow for the next stage of growth and, ideally, job creation follows. After a decline in annual deal volume and value between 2014 and 2016,1 the U.S. IPO market returned to pre-2015 levels in 20172 and continued to build momentum throughout 2018,3 20194 and the first quarter of 2020,5 until the IPO market was virtually shut down mid-March as a result of market volatility and uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, an oil slump triggered by production increases by Saudi Arabia and Russia, and the resulting prospect of a recession. As the markets are expected to continue to be volatile and uncertain, the IPO market will likely face similar challenges, especially in the near term. Notwithstanding these fluctuations in IPO activity, history has shown that equity markets have played a central role during periods of significant economic expansion in the United States. The benefits of seeking public capital date back in history at least as far as 1602, when the Dutch East India Company was founded as a shareholder company. This diversified investor structure allowed the risks of trade voyages between Europe and Asia to be distributed across multiple mercantile organizations.6 Historians do not readily agree on when the first securities market began in the United States; however, according to at least one historian, securities transactions took place as early as 1725 in New York.7 At the time, a small number of securities transactions were intermediated by auctioneers who primarily conducted auctions for commodities that flowed through the ports of New York. While this form of intermediation was far less structured in the early days, a more formalized process began to emerge with the Buttonwood Tree Agreement in 1792, where 24 stockbrokers agreed on dealing terms. This organization is understood to have been the foundation of what would become the New York Stock and Exchange Board, or the New York Stock Exchange as we know it today.8 These arrangements provided an orderly mechanism to support the economic expansion that took hold in the United States during the 1800s. Tremendous investment in infrastructure and transportation led the way, while the New York Stock Exchange permitted the formation and growth of dozens of companies that became integral to the economy. Emerging regulatory framework Despite the growing significance of the New York Stock Exchange and open criticism in the early 1900s of its failure to adopt more stringent self-regulation, structural government GLI – Initial Public Offerings 2020, Fourth Edition 1 www.globallegalinsights.com © Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Foreword oversight did not come until the 1930s. Even the 1907 financial crisis focused attention on the banking system rather than the capital markets, and culminated in the Federal Reserve Act of 1912 and creation of the central banking system in the United States.9 The securities markets continued to innovate with minimal government oversight, and in 1924 the Massachusetts Investors Trust, which is believed to be the first modern-day mutual fund with an open-end capitalization structure, was created.10 Like the Dutch East India Company before it, the structure spread financial risks among a diversified pool of investors and for the first time provided smaller investors access to the securities markets. However, it was the 1929 stock market crash and the beginning of the Great Depression that would eventually spur an investigation and substantive review of the securities markets, as well as the role of the New York Stock Exchange therein. The subsequent passage of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 created the foundation of the regulatory structure that we know today. Importantly, as the United States later experienced a post- war boom with the growth and development of new industries, this more fortified exchange structure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • With Equities Looking Expensive, Where Should Investors Turn?
    Active is: Thinking without limits With equities looking expensive, allianzgi.com where should investors turn? May 2021 US stocks are highly valued, and our 10-step checklist suggests they’re close to bubble territory. Non-US equities offer better value, but we still don’t think investors should drastically pare back their US holdings at this time. For more than a decade, stocks have been on a steady march upwards – and not even the global Key takeaways downturn caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has thrown them off for long. So are equities, – Equities, especially in the US, are very Stefan Hofrichter, expensive – around the level last seen CFA particularly in the US, too expensive? Could they Head of Global even be in bubble territory? If so, when might before the tech bubble burst in the Economics & they pop? late 1990s Strategy To answer these questions, we developed a – High valuations are one of the 10 10-criteria “bubble checklist” inspired by the characteristics of an asset bubble that work of Charles Kindleberger, an economic and we’ve identified – and the majority are financial-market historian. Each asset bubble showing red flags throughout history has been unique in its own – But until the Fed starts to “taper” its way – yet with few exceptions, each one also met essentially all 10 of these criteria. bond purchases, likely in 2022, US equities may very well bubble up further Our analysis indicates that today, US equities demonstrate most of the characteristics of an – We still prefer risk assets at this time asset bubble.
    [Show full text]
  • Defenses to Customer Claims Against Stockbrokers
    DEFENSES TO CUSTOMER CLAIMS AGAINST STOCKBROKERS Elizabeth Hoop Fay, Esquire Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Philadelphia Foster S. Goldman, Jr., Esquire Markel Schafer & Goldman, PC Pittsburgh DEFENSES TO CUSTOMER CLAIMS AGAINST STOCKBROKERS I. DEFENSES TO CHURNING, SUITABILITY AND UNAUTHORIZED TRADING CLAIMS A. The Elements of Causes of Action for Churning, Unsuitable Recommendations and Unauthorized Trading 1. Churning of a brokerage account occurs when a broker who exercises control over the trading engages in an excessive number of transactions in order to generate commissions. See, e.g., Costello v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 711 F.2d 1361, 1368-69 (7th Cir. 1983). To prevail on a churning claim, the customer must prove three elements: (1) control of the account by the broker; (2) trading activity that is excessive in light of the customer’s investment objectives; and (3) that the broker acted with scienter, i.e., intent to defraud or reckless disregard of the customer’s interests. Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co., 899 F.2d 485, 489 (6th Cir. 1990). 2. While a churning claim is a challenge to the quantity of transactions, a suitability claim challenges the quality of the investments recommended by the broker. To prevail on a suitability claim, the customer generally must prove: (1) that the broker recommended securities that are unsuitable in light of the customer’s investment objectives; and (2) that the broker did so with intent to defraud or with reckless disregard for the client’s interests. E.g., Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group Inc., 991 F.2d 1020, 1031 (2d Cir. 1991). 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Public Offerings
    November 2017 Initial Public Offerings An Issuer’s Guide (US Edition) Contents INTRODUCTION 1 What Are the Potential Benefits of Conducting an IPO? 1 What Are the Potential Costs and Other Potential Downsides of Conducting an IPO? 1 Is Your Company Ready for an IPO? 2 GETTING READY 3 Are Changes Needed in the Company’s Capital Structure or Relationships with Its Key Stockholders or Other Related Parties? 3 What Is the Right Corporate Governance Structure for the Company Post-IPO? 5 Are the Company’s Existing Financial Statements Suitable? 6 Are the Company’s Pre-IPO Equity Awards Problematic? 6 How Should Investor Relations Be Handled? 7 Which Securities Exchange to List On? 8 OFFER STRUCTURE 9 Offer Size 9 Primary vs. Secondary Shares 9 Allocation—Institutional vs. Retail 9 KEY DOCUMENTS 11 Registration Statement 11 Form 8-A – Exchange Act Registration Statement 19 Underwriting Agreement 20 Lock-Up Agreements 21 Legal Opinions and Negative Assurance Letters 22 Comfort Letters 22 Engagement Letter with the Underwriters 23 KEY PARTIES 24 Issuer 24 Selling Stockholders 24 Management of the Issuer 24 Auditors 24 Underwriters 24 Legal Advisers 25 Other Parties 25 i Initial Public Offerings THE IPO PROCESS 26 Organizational or “Kick-Off” Meeting 26 The Due Diligence Review 26 Drafting Responsibility and Drafting Sessions 27 Filing with the SEC, FINRA, a Securities Exchange and the State Securities Commissions 27 SEC Review 29 Book-Building and Roadshow 30 Price Determination 30 Allocation and Settlement or Closing 31 Publicity Considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Broker Fiduciary Duties and the Impact of the Dodd-Frank Act Thomas Lee Hazen
    NORTH CAROLINA BANKING INSTITUTE Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Stock Broker Fiduciary Duties and the Impact of the Dodd-Frank Act Thomas Lee Hazen Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons Recommended Citation Thomas L. Hazen, Stock Broker Fiduciary Duties and the Impact of the Dodd-Frank Act, 15 N.C. Banking Inst. 47 (2011). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi/vol15/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Banking Institute by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STOCK BROKER FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND THE IMPACT OF THE DODD-FRANK ACT THOMAS LEE HAZEN* In recent years there has been concern about the sufficiency of broker-dealerregulation. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 mandates the SEC to review and evaluate existing regulation and to adopt such rules as may be necessary to enhance existing regulation. Existing SEC and FINRA rulemaking addresses broker-dealer conduct, but by and large the regulation has been based on principles and standards rather than voluminous detailed rules specifying prohibited conduct. This article examines the extent to which additional regulation is warranted and whether to continue to rely on principles-based regulation, or whether there should be more explicit rules to heighten broker-dealer standards. The article concludes that although the existing framework for broker-dealer regulation is robust, it could be fine-tuned by possibly adding an express fiduciary duty requirement as well as more specific rule-based prohibitions.
    [Show full text]
  • China Client Alert
    China Client Alert Hong Kong Regulator issues Guidelines on IPO Cornerstone Investments Last month, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange ("HKEx") issued new guidelines for cornerstone investments (the “Guidance Letter”). In the Guidance Letter, HKEx sets out its general policies on IPO cornerstone investments and expresses its concerns over side arrangements made between cornerstone investors and listing applicants. Paul, Weiss Asia Offices Highlights of HKEx's policies on IPO Cornerstone Investments: A) Principles for Approving IPO Cornerstone Investments BEIJING Unit 3601, Fortune Plaza Office HKEx approves a preferential placing to cornerstone investors Tower A based on the following principles: No. 7 Dong Sanhuan Zhonglu Chao Yang District, Beijing 100020 • Placing price is at IPO price, People’s Republic of China • +86 10 5828 6300 IPO shares are subject to lock-up (at least 6 months), • Investor has no board representation, HONG KONG Hong Kong Club Building, 12th Flo0r • Investor is independent of listing applicant, its connected persons 3A Chater Road, Central and their respective associates, Hong Kong • Details of placing arrangements are disclosed in the prospectus, +852 2846 0300 and TOKYO • IPO shares are counted as part of the public float so long as the Fukoku Seimei Building investor is a member of the public under Hong Kong Listing Rules. 2-2, Uchisaiwaicho 2-chome Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, B) Reclassification of Cornerstone Investors as Pre-IPO Japan Investors +81 3 3597 8101 HKEx may reclassify a cornerstone investor as a pre-IPO investor if, with respect to acquisition of IPO shares, such investor (whether by way of side letters or otherwise): (i) receives any direct or indirect benefit (other than a guaranteed allocation of IPO shares), for example: • waiver of brokerage commission, • ©2013 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & put option for other person to buy back shares after listing, Garrison LLP.
    [Show full text]
  • Ladies of the Ticker
    By George Robb During the late 19th century, a growing number of women were finding employ- ment in banking and insurance, but not on Wall Street. Probably no area of Amer- ican finance offered fewer job opportuni- ties to women than stock broking. In her 1863 survey, The Employments of Women, Virginia Penny, who was usually eager to promote new fields of employment for women, noted with approval that there were no women stockbrokers in the United States. Penny argued that “women could not very well conduct the busi- ness without having to mix promiscuously with men on the street, and stop and talk to them in the most public places; and the delicacy of woman would forbid that.” The radical feminist Victoria Woodhull did not let delicacy stand in her way when she and her sister opened a brokerage house near Wall Street in 1870, but she paid a heavy price for her audacity. The scandals which eventually drove Wood- hull out of business and out of the country cast a long shadow over other women’s careers as brokers. Histories of Wall Street rarely mention women brokers at all. They might note Victoria Woodhull’s distinction as the nation’s first female stockbroker, but they don’t discuss the subject again until they reach the 1960s. This neglect is unfortu- nate, as it has left generations of pioneering Wall Street women hidden from history. These extraordinary women struggled to establish themselves professionally and to overcome chauvinistic prejudice that a career in finance was unfeminine. Ladies When Mrs. M.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Operations of a Typical Stockbroker and an Issuing House
    THE OPERATIONS OF A TYPICAL STOCKBROKER AND AN ISSUING HOUSE A PAPER PRESENTED BY MR. AZU ODITA GENERAL MANAGER/CEO, NETWORTH SECURITIES & FINANCE LIMITED (A MEMBER OF THE NIGERIAN STOCK EXCHANGE) LAGOS, NIGERIA Outline Who is a Stockbroker Requirements of a Stockbroker Services offered by a Stockbroker Relationship with other Stakeholders in the capital market Who is a Stockbroker A licensed dealing member of an Exchange Ø To deal in financial instruments available in the Money & Capital Markets uPrimary activity is in the capital market Dealing firms are the principal while the Authorized dealing clerks are the brokers/agents of the dealing firms Other features Ø Registered with CAC and SEC Ø Roles in the market depend on Capital bases, Expertise and Status of Registration u Broker = N40 Million u Dealer = N30 Million u Broker/Dealer = N70 Million – A broker transacts on behalf of customers only while a dealer transacts on behalf of his company Requirements of a Stockbroker ØIntegrity – His Word is his Bond ØInnovation in value-added services e.g. Margin Trading, Security Lending, REPO transactions ØKnow your Client (KYC) ØExcellent Analytical Skill ØFinancial Training ØFund Management & Administration ØFinancial Supermarket - gain advantage of size & distribution network ØOffshore Alliance. Services Offered by A Stockbroking Firm Not standardised Ø Differs from one organisation to another Examples Stockbroking New Issues Research & Portfolio Management Bond Trading Credit Analysis Stockbroking Receives and process transaction orders
    [Show full text]
  • Semi Annual Report April 2008
    FEDERATION OF EURO-ASIAN STOCK EXCHANGES SEMI ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2008 FEDERATION OF EURO-ASIAN STOCK EXCHANGES SEMI ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Federation of Euro-Asian Stock Exchanges 3 Deutsche Boerse 10 Garanti Asset Management 13 Is Investment 14 NASDAQ OMX 16 Tayburn Kurumsal 18 Finans Asset Management 20 Quartal FLife 21 Stock Exchange Profiles Abu Dhabi Securities Market 24 Amman Stock Exchange 28 Armenian Stock Exchange 32 Bahrain Stock Exchange 36 Baku Interbank Currency Exchange 40 Baku Stock Exchange 44 Banja Luka Stock Exchange 46 Belarusian Currency and Stock Exchange 50 Belgrade Stock Exchange 54 Bucharest Stock Exchange 58 Bulgarian Stock Exchange 62 Cairo and Alexandria Stock Exchanges 66 Georgian Stock Exchange 70 Iraq Stock Exchange 74 Istanbul Stock Exchange 78 Karachi Stock Exchange 82 Kazakhstan Stock Exchange 86 Kyrgyz Stock Exchange 90 Lahore Stock Exchange 94 Macedonian Stock Exchange 96 Moldovan Stock Exchange 100 Mongolian Stock Exchange 104 Montenegro Stock Exchange 108 Muscat Securities Market 112 Palestine Securities Exchange 116 Sarajevo Stock Exchange 120 State Commodity & Raw Materials Exchange of Turkmenistan 122 Tehran Stock Exchange 126 Tirana Stock Exchange 130 “Toshkent” Republican Stock Exchange 134 Ukrainian Stock Exchange 138 Zagreb Stock Exchange 142 Affiliate Member Profiles CDA Central Depository of Armenia 147 Central Registry Agency Inc. of Turkey 148 Central Securities Depository of Iran 149 Macedonian Central Securities Depository 150 Misr For Clearing, Settlement & Central Depository 151 Securities Depository Center (SDC) of Jordan 152 Takasbank - ISE Settlement and Custody Bank, Inc. 153 Tehran Securities Exchange Technology Management Company (TSETMC) 154 Member List 155 FEDERATION OF EURO-ASIAN STOCK EXCHANGES (FEAS) The Federation of Euro-Asian Stock Exchanges Semi Annual Report April 2008 is published by the Federation of Euro-Asian Stock I.M.K.B Building, Emirgan 34467 Istanbul, Turkey Exchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Professional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: an Antidote for Bubbles?
    Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2002 The rP ofessional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: An Antidote for Bubbles? Steven A. Ramirez Loyola University Chicago, School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Ramirez, Steven, The rP ofessional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: An Antidote for Bubbles? 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 527 (2002) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF SECURITIES BROKERS UNDER FEDERAL LAW: AN ANTIDOTE FOR BUBBLES? Steven A. Ramirez* I. INTRODUCTION In the wake of the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed legislation specifically designed to extend greater protection to the investing public and to elevate business practices within the securities brokerage industry.' This legislative initiative ultimately gave birth to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the '34 Act).' The '34 Act represented the first large scale regulation of the nation's public securities markets. Up until that time, the securities brokerage industry4 had been left to regulate itself (through various private stock exchanges). This system of * Professor of Law, Washburn University School of Law. Professor William Rich caused me to write this Article by arranging a Faculty Scholarship Forum at Washburn University in the'Spring of 2001 and asking me to participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrip Dividend in the Form of New Shares
    Your responsibilities Principal register Hong Kong Overseas Branch register THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are Computershare Investor Services PLC Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited in any doubt about this document or as to the action you should take, you should consult a Whether or not it is to your advantage to elect to receive new shares in lieu of a cash The Pavilions Rooms 1712-1716, 17th Floor stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other appropriate independent professional adviser. dividend or to elect to receive payment in US dollars, sterling or Hong Kong dollars Bridgwater Road Hopewell Centre If you sold or transferred all or some of your ordinary shares on or before 15 May 2019, but those is a matter for individual decision by each shareholder. HSBC cannot accept any Bristol 183 Queen’s Road East shares are included in the number shown in box 1 on your form of election or entitlement advice for responsibility for your decision. BS99 6ZZ Hong Kong SAR the first interim dividend for 2019, you should, without delay, consult the stockbroker or other agent United Kingdom Telephone: +852 2862 8555 through whom the sale or transfer was effected for advice on the action you should take. Overseas shareholders Telephone: +44 (0) 370 702 0137 Email: [email protected] Email via website: Investor Centre: Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this document, make no representation as to its accuracy or No person receiving a copy of this document or the form of election in any jurisdiction www.investorcentre.co.uk/contactus www.investorcentre.com/hk Investor Centre: completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Sec Formalizes Its Position on Pipe Transactions
    June 2007 SEC FORMALIZES ITS POSITION ON PIPE TRANSACTIONS By Jeffrey T. Hartlin, Elizabeth A. Brower and Michael L. Zuppone Private investment in public equity offerings, labeled primary offering made on behalf of the issuer, in which “PIPEs” by market participants, have become a case the PIPE investors would be viewed as effectively permanent alternative for raising equity capital by public acting as statutory underwriters with respect to the companies in need of financing. Pursuant to informal resale of their shares to the public. guidance issued by the Staff of the Securities and BACKGROUND Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in the mid 1990s, PIPEs have been treated as completed private placements not PIPE transactions have two components. The first subject to integration with subsequent registered component involves the original issuance of the secondary offerings by selling securityholders. Under securities – i.e., the private placement of securities by a this guidance, PIPE investors have been able to have the public company to one or more accredited investors in shares issued in (or the shares underlying convertible reliance on the statutory private placement exemption securities issued in) the PIPE transaction registered for provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or public resale into the trading market concurrently with private offering exemption provided by Regulation D or soon after the closing of the PIPE transaction. under the Securities Act. The securities sold in PIPEs Recently, as described below, the treatment of PIPEs may include common stock, straight or convertible investors in registered offerings as just selling preferred stock, convertible debt or a combination of securityholders, as opposed to statutory underwriters, these securities, as well as warrants that are issued to has been called into question in certain circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Selecting a Stockbroker Or Investment Adviser
    Assessing Your Needs Before you seek the services of a professional stockbroker or investment adviser, take some ti me to evaluate your Selecting needs and expectati ons. This analysis will help you choose the right person a Stockbroker for the job. or • Defi ne Your Goals Securiti es Division Short- and long-term goals need to be The Securities Division of the Secretary of Investment identified. Determine the degree of risk State’s Office is responsible for regulating you are willing to assume to achieve the offer and sale of certain types of Adviser your fi nancial goals. investments known as securities. These may include many types of stocks, bonds, limited partnerships, viatical sett lement investment • Determine Your Net Worth contracts, some oil and gas investments, Figure out your assets and liabiliti es -- and other investment contracts. what you own and what you owe. Be sure Our major activities include registration to take into account any growing debts, of securities offerings, the licensing of likely tax increases, or personal or health stockbrokers and investment advisers, and crises which may strain fi nances. the investigati on of alleged violati ons of the securiti es laws. • Anticipate Life Changes Please call us with any questi ons at Consider any plans which might have an 601-359-1334. Mississippi residents may impact on your fi nances, such as making a also reach us by calling toll-free at career change, having children, paying school 888-236-6167. tuiti on or reti ring. Securities Division P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 601-359-1334 www.sos.ms.gov Dear Fellow Mississippians: Selecting Your Adviser To select the best Be sure to look for certain characteristics and qualifications when choosing someone to manage financial adviser, you your investments.
    [Show full text]