Exploring Exoplanet Populations with NASA's Kepler Mission

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring Exoplanet Populations with NASA's Kepler Mission SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE SPECIAL FEATURE: Exploring exoplanet populations with NASA’s Kepler Mission Natalie M. Batalha1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, 94035 CA Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board June 3, 2014 (received for review January 15, 2014) The Kepler Mission is exploring the diversity of planets and planetary systems. Its legacy will be a catalog of discoveries sufficient for computing planet occurrence rates as a function of size, orbital period, star type, and insolation flux.The mission has made significant progress toward achieving that goal. Over 3,500 transiting exoplanets have been identified from the analysis of the first 3 y of data, 100 planets of which are in the habitable zone. The catalog has a high reliability rate (85–90% averaged over the period/radius plane), which is improving as follow-up observations continue. Dynamical (e.g., velocimetry and transit timing) and statistical methods have confirmed and characterized hundreds of planets over a large range of sizes and compositions for both single- and multiple-star systems. Population studies suggest that planets abound in our galaxy and that small planets are particularly frequent. Here, I report on the progress Kepler has made measuring the prevalence of exoplanets orbiting within one astronomical unit of their host stars in support of the National Aeronautics and Space Admin- istration’s long-term goal of finding habitable environments beyond the solar system. planet detection | transit photometry Searching for evidence of life beyond Earth is the Sun would produce an 84-ppm signal Translating Kepler’s discovery catalog into one of the primary goals of science agencies lasting ∼13 h. population statistics requires corrections for in the United States and abroad. The goal Kepler’s pixel and flux measurements (2) observation and detection biases. This is a looms closer as a result of exoplanet discov- are publicly available at the Mikulski Archive work in progress. However, occurrence rate eries made by the National Aeronautics and for Space Telescopes (MAST) (http://archive. calculations based on subsets of the data al- Space Administration’s(NASA)10thDiscov- stsci.edu/kepler). Transit searches have been ready indicate that nature produces small ery Mission, Kepler. Launched in March performed on successively larger data volumes planets relatively efficiently in the warmer 2009, the Kepler spacecraft is exploring the yielding incremental planet candidate cat- environs of a planetary system. Giant planets diversity of planets and planetary systems alogs that are hosted at NASA’sExoplanet in such orbits are orders of magnitude less within one astronomical unit (AU). The pri- Archive (NEA) (http://exoplanetarchive.ipac. frequent than their sub-Neptunian counter- mary mission objective is to determine the parts. Ironically, the hot Jupiters that com- caltech.edu). To date, approximately three- prevalence of potentially habitable, Earth-size prised the very first Doppler and transiting quarters of the data have been thoroughly planets in the galaxy. Discovering exoterrans exoplanet discoveries are actually quite rare. in the habitable zone (HZ), characterizing searched. As of this writing (April 2014), the Current results for habitable-zone planets tell those that have habitable environments, and archive is host to over 3,500 viable planet us that we may not have to look very far be- then focusing on the signatures of biological candidates (with radii smaller than twice fore happening upon a planet similar to Earth. chemistry is a path of exploration that Jupiter). All have been subjected to a series A comprehensive review of Kepler exo- stretches decades into the future. It begins of statistical tests (based on the Kepler data planet science is beyond the scope of this by determining if planets like Earth are itself) that ensure a low rate of instrumental contribution. Here, I focus on the science abundant. and astrophysical false positives (3). leading to the determination of planet oc- Kepler has a follow-up observation pro- currence rates, from the discovery catalogs ’ NASA s 10th Discovery Mission gram to increase the reliability of the catalog to the first calculations of the prevalence of From 2009 to 2013, Kepler monitored a 115- even further by (i) improving the accuracy Earth-like planets. square-degree field in the constellations of the host star properties which in turn Kepler Transforms the Discovery Space Cygnus and Lyra, collecting ultrahigh pre- improves the accuracy of the planet proper- Exoplanet discoveries trickled in at a steady cision photometry of over 190,000 stars si- ties (or changes the interpretation altogether) multaneously at a 30-min cadence. Nearly rate in the latter half of the 1990s. Approxi- and (ii) identifying bound stellar companions uninterrupted photometry is possible due mately 30 were reported with sizes ranging and line-of-sight neighbors that might in- to a heliocentric orbit and off-ecliptic point- from 0.4 to 8 Jupiter masses and orbital ing. The observations yield an evenly sam- dicate an astrophysical false positive. Ground- periods ranging from 3 to 3,800 d. Heralding pled, minimally gapped flux time series that and space-based telescopes with apertures in the new millennium, the first transiting can be searched for periodic diminutions of ranging from 1.5 to 10 m are being used to acquire high-resolution spectroscopy and light due to the transit of an exoplanet Author contributions: N.M.B. designed research, performed re- across the stellar disk in an aligned ge- high-contrast/high-spatial resolution images. search, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. ometry. The photometer was engineered to Strategic high-precision Doppler measure- The author declares no conflict of interest. achieve 20-ppm relative precision in 6.5 h ments are providing planet masses in an This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. A.S.B. is a guest editor for a 12th magnitude G-type main-sequence effort to delineate the transition between invited by the Editorial Board. star (1). For reference, the Earth orbiting terrestrial and giant planets. 1Email: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1304196111 PNAS | September 2, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 35 | 12647–12654 Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 exoplanet was discovered (4, 5). The timing detections), they are estimated using a poly- 2,658 stars based on 1.5, 13, 16, 22, and 34.5 was a boon for Kepler as it was proposing to nomial fit to solar system planets (R = M0.4854) of the ∼48 mo of data acquired during the use this detection technique from space. In (6). Shown here are 3,553 Kepler discoveries primary mission (7–11). Kepler data in the 2000, Kepler was one of the three Discovery associated with 2,658 stars. Approximately prime mission were downlinked monthly but Mission proposals invited to submit a Con- 22% of the Kepler host stars are known to processed on a quarterly basis. Transit searches cept Study Report. It was selected for flight harbor multiple planet candidates. The over- and the associated planet candidate catalogs on December 20, 2001. all reliability of the catalog (80–90%) is are, therefore, referred to by the quarters As Kepler was being designed and built, discussed below. bracketing the data. The most recent planet exoplanet discoveries were growing at an The demographics of the observed pop- candidates were identified in a search of 12 accelerated pace. By the eve of Kepler’s ulation has changed remarkably. Kepler has quarters of data (Q1–Q12) where the first is launch, over 300 discoveries had been re- increased the roster of exoplanets by nearly only slightly longer than one month in du- ported including nearly 70 transiting systems. 400%. More remarkable still is the change in ration (hence the 34.5-mo time span). All non-Kepler discoveries up through April the distribution: 86% of the non-Kepler dis- Previously detected candidates are reex- 2014 are shown in Fig. 1, Left, in a plot of coveries have masses larger than Neptune amined as larger data volumes become avail- mass (or minimum mass for nontransiting whereas 85% of the Kepler discoveries have able. However, this does not occur with every planets) versus orbital period with symbols radii smaller than Neptune. Kepler is filling catalog release. Some of the candidates in the color-coded by the discovery method. (Meth- in an area of parameters space that was not cumulative archive at the NEA were discov- odologies with small numbers of discoveries previously accessible. The increase in sensi- ered with less than 34.5 mo of data and have have been left out for clarity). Collectively, tivity afforded us by Kepler has opened the not yet been reexamined. This nonuniformity there are 697 (non-Kepler)exoplanets(with floodgates to the small planets so difficult to will be resolved as Kepler completes its final a measured orbital period and radius or mass) detect from ground-based surveys. The most search and vetting of the entire 17 quarters associated with 583 unique stars. Approxi- common type of planet known to us is a (48 mo) of data acquired during its primary ’ mately 16% of these host stars are known to population that does not exist in ourown solar mission lifetime. Kepler splanetcandidate harbor multiple planets. system: the super-Earths and mini-Neptunes catalog is also known as the Kepler Object of Fig. 1, Right,showsthesamepopulation between1and4Earthradii. Interest (KOI) Catalog. However, KOIs also together with the Kepler planet candidate include events that are classified as false discoveries in the cumulative table at NEA Status of Kepler’s Discovery Catalogs alarms or astrophysical false positives. Only as of April 2014. Detections are plotted as Catalogs of Kepler’s viable planet candidates those flagged as planet candidates in the planet radius versus orbital period, and the have been released periodically since launch NEA cumulative catalog are shown in Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Get Outside What to Look for in the Summer Sky Your Hosts of the Summer Sky Are Three Bright Stars — Vega, Altair and Deneb
    Get Outside What to Look for in the Summer Sky Your hosts of the summer sky are three bright stars — Vega, Altair and Deneb. Together they make up the Summer Triangle. Look for the triangle in the east on a June evening, moving NORTH to overhead as the season progresses. Polaris The Big Dipper Deneb Cygnus Vega Lyra Hercules Arcturus EaST West Summer Triangle Altair Aquila Sagittarius Antares Turn the map so Scorpius the direction you are facing is at the Teapot the bottom. south facebook.com/KidsCanBooks @KidsCanPress GET OUTSIDE Text © 2013 Jane Drake & Ann Love Illustrations © 2013 Heather Collins www.kidscanpress.com Get Outside Vega The Keystone The brightest star in the Between Vega and Arcturus, Summer Triangle, Vega is look for four stars in a wedge or The summer bluish white. It is in the keystone shape. This is the body solstice constellation Lyra, the Harp. of Hercules, the Strongman. His feet are to the north and Every day from late Altair his arms to the south, making December to June, the The second-brightest star in his figure kneel Sun rises and sets a little the triangle, Altair is white. upside down farther north along the Altair is in the constellation in the sky. horizon. But about June Aquila, the Eagle. 21, the Sun seems to stop Keystone moving north. It rises in Deneb the northeast and sets in The dimmest star of the the northwest, seemingly Summer Triangle, Deneb would in the same spots for be the brightest if it were not so Hercules several days.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of TRAPPIST-1
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 11, EPSC2017-265, 2017 European Planetary Science Congress 2017 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2017 Formation of TRAPPIST-1 C.W Ormel, B. Liu and D. Schoonenberg University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands ([email protected]) Abstract start to drift by aerodynamical drag. However, this growth+drift occurs in an inside-out fashion, which We present a model for the formation of the recently- does not result in strong particle pileups needed to discovered TRAPPIST-1 planetary system. In our sce- trigger planetesimal formation by, e.g., the streaming nario planets form in the interior regions, by accre- instability [3]. (a) We propose that the H2O iceline (r 0.1 au for TRAPPIST-1) is the place where tion of mm to cm-size particles (pebbles) that drifted ice ≈ the local solids-to-gas ratio can reach 1, either by from the outer disk. This scenario has several ad- ∼ vantages: it connects to the observation that disks are condensation of the vapor [9] or by pileup of ice-free made up of pebbles, it is efficient, it explains why the (silicate) grains [2, 8]. Under these conditions plan- TRAPPIST-1 planets are Earth mass, and it provides etary embryos can form. (b) Due to type I migration, ∼ a rationale for the system’s architecture. embryos cross the iceline and enter the ice-free region. (c) There, silicate pebbles are smaller because of col- lisional fragmentation. Nevertheless, pebble accretion 1. Introduction remains efficient and growth is fast [6]. (d) At approx- TRAPPIST-1 is an M8 main-sequence star located at a imately Earth masses embryos reach their pebble iso- distance of 12 pc.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Constellations
    Night Sky 101: Summer Constellations The Summer Triangle Photo Credit: Smoky Mountain Astronomical Society The Summer Triangle is made up of three bright stars—Altair, in the constellation Aquila (the eagle), Deneb in Cygnus (the swan), and Vega Lyra (the lyre, or harp). Also called “The Northern Cross” or “The Backbone of the Milky Way,” Cygnus is a horizontal cross of five bright stars. In very dark skies, Cygnus helps viewers find the Milky Way. Albireo, the last star in Cygnus’s tail, is actually made up of two stars (a binary star). The separate stars can be seen with a 30 power telescope. The Ring Nebula, part of the constellation Lyra, can also be seen with this magnification. In Japanese mythology, Vega, the celestial princess and goddess, fell in love Altair. Her father did not approve of Altair, since he was a mortal. They were forbidden from seeing each other. The two lovers were placed in the sky, where they were separated by the Celestial River, repre- sented by the Milky Way. According to the legend, once a year, a bridge of magpies form, rep- resented by Cygnus, to reunite the lovers. Photo credit: Unknown Scorpius Also called Scorpio, Scorpius is one of the 12 Zodiac constellations, which are used in reading horoscopes. Scorpius represents those born during October 23 to November 21. Scorpio is easy to spot in the summer sky. It is made up of a long string bright stars, which are visible in most lights, especially Antares, because of its distinctly red color. Antares is about 850 times bigger than our sun and is a red giant.
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Habitability, and Detectability Steve Desch
    Water, Habitability, and Detectability Steve Desch PI, “Exoplanetary Ecosystems” NExSS team School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University with Ariel Anbar, Tessa Fisher, Steven Glaser, Hilairy Hartnett, Stephen Kane, Susanne Neuer, Cayman Unterborn, Sara Walker, Misha Zolotov Astrobiology Science Strategy NAS Committee, Beckmann Center, Irvine, CA (remotely), January 17, 2018 How to look for life on (Earth-like) exoplanets: find oxygen in their atmospheres How Earth-like must an exoplanet be for this to work? Seager et al. (2013) How to look for life on (Earth-like) exoplanets: find oxygen in their atmospheres Oxygen on Earth overwhelmingly produced by photosynthesizing life, which taps Sun’s energy and yields large disequilibrium signature. Caveats: Earth had life for billions of years without O2 in its atmosphere. First photosynthesis to evolve on Earth was anoxygenic. Many ‘false positives’ recognized because O2 has abiotic sources, esp. photolysis (Luger & Barnes 2014; Harman et al. 2015; Meadows 2017). These caveats seem like exceptions to the ‘rule’ that ‘oxygen = life’. How non-Earth-like can an exoplanet be (especially with respect to water content) before oxygen is no longer a biosignature? Part 1: How much water can terrestrial planets form with? Part 2: Are Aqua Planets or Water Worlds habitable? Can we detect life on them? Part 3: How should we look for life on exoplanets? Part 1: How much water can terrestrial planets form with? Theory says: up to hundreds of oceans’ worth of water Trappist-1 system suggests hundreds of oceans, especially around M stars Many (most?) planets may be Aqua Planets or Water Worlds How much water can terrestrial planets form with? Earth- “snow line” Standard Sun distance models of distance accretion suggest abundant water.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of the Solar System (Chapter 8)
    Formation of the Solar System (Chapter 8) Based on Chapter 8 • This material will be useful for understanding Chapters 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 on “Formation of the solar system”, “Planetary geology”, “Planetary atmospheres”, “Jovian planet systems”, “Remnants of ice and rock”, “Extrasolar planets” and “The Sun: Our Star” • Chapters 2, 3, 4, and 7 on “The orbits of the planets”, “Why does Earth go around the Sun?”, “Momentum, energy, and matter”, and “Our planetary system” will be useful for understanding this chapter Goals for Learning • Where did the solar system come from? • How did planetesimals form? • How did planets form? Patterns in the Solar System • Patterns of motion (orbits and rotations) • Two types of planets: Small, rocky inner planets and large, gas outer planets • Many small asteroids and comets whose orbits and compositions are similar • Exceptions to these patterns, such as Earth’s large moon and Uranus’s sideways tilt Help from Other Stars • Use observations of the formation of other stars to improve our theory for the formation of our solar system • Use this theory to make predictions about the formation of other planetary systems Nebular Theory of Solar System Formation • A cloud of gas, the “solar nebula”, collapses inwards under its own weight • Cloud heats up, spins faster, gets flatter (disk) as a central star forms • Gas cools and some materials condense as solid particles that collide, stick together, and grow larger Where does a cloud of gas come from? • Big Bang -> Hydrogen and Helium • First stars use this
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Hunters. VI: an Independent Characterization of KOI-351 and Several Long Period Planet Candidates from the Kepler Archival Data
    Accepted to AJ Planet Hunters VI: An Independent Characterization of KOI-351 and Several Long Period Planet Candidates from the Kepler Archival Data1 Joseph R. Schmitt2, Ji Wang2, Debra A. Fischer2, Kian J. Jek7, John C. Moriarty2, Tabetha S. Boyajian2, Megan E. Schwamb3, Chris Lintott4;5, Stuart Lynn5, Arfon M. Smith5, Michael Parrish5, Kevin Schawinski6, Robert Simpson4, Daryll LaCourse7, Mark R. Omohundro7, Troy Winarski7, Samuel Jon Goodman7, Tony Jebson7, Hans Martin Schwengeler7, David A. Paterson7, Johann Sejpka7, Ivan Terentev7, Tom Jacobs7, Nawar Alsaadi7, Robert C. Bailey7, Tony Ginman7, Pete Granado7, Kristoffer Vonstad Guttormsen7, Franco Mallia7, Alfred L. Papillon7, Franco Rossi7, and Miguel Socolovsky7 [email protected] ABSTRACT We report the discovery of 14 new transiting planet candidates in the Kepler field from the Planet Hunters citizen science program. None of these candidates overlapped with Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) at the time of submission. We report the discovery of one more addition to the six planet candidate system around KOI-351, making it the only seven planet candidate system from Kepler. Additionally, KOI-351 bears some resemblance to our own solar system, with the inner five planets ranging from Earth to mini-Neptune radii and the outer planets being gas giants; however, this system is very compact, with all seven planet candidates orbiting . 1 AU from their host star. A Hill stability test and an orbital integration of the system shows that the system is stable. Furthermore, we significantly add to the population of long period 1This publication has been made possible through the work of more than 280,000 volunteers in the Planet Hunters project, whose contributions are individually acknowledged at http://www.planethunters.org/authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation at Your Fingertips: Cygnus
    The National Optical Astronomy Observatory’s Dark Skies and Energy Education Program Constellation at Your Fingertips: Cygnus (Cygnus version adapted from Constellation at Your Fingertips: Orion at www.globeatnight.org) Grades: 3rd - 8th grade Overview: Constellation at Your Fingertips introduces the novice constellation hunter to a method for spotting the main stars in the constellation, Cygnus, the swan. Students will make an outline of the constellation used to locate the stars in Cygnus and visualize its shape. This lesson will engage children and first-time night sky viewers in observations of the night sky. The lesson links history, Greek mythology, literature, and astronomy. Once the constellation is identified, it may be easy to find the summer triangle. The simplicity of Cygnus makes locating and observing it exciting for young learners. More on Cygnus is at the Great World Wide Star Count at http://www.starcount.org. Materials for another citizen-science star hunt, Globe at Night, are available at http://www.globeatnight.org. Purpose: Students will use the this activity to visualize the constellation of Cygnus. This will help them more easily participate in the Great World Wide Star Count citizen-science campaign. The campaign asks participants to match one of 7 different charts of Cygnus with what the participant sees toward Cygnus. Chart 1 has only a few stars. Chart 7 has many. What they will be recording for the campaign is the chart with the faintest star they see. In many cases, observations over years will build knowledge of how light pollution changes over time. Why is this important to astronomers? What causes the variation year to year? The focus is on light pollution and the options we have as consumers when purchasing outdoor lighting and shields.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Evaluating Galactic Habitability Using High
    University of Groningen Evaluating galactic habitability using high-resolution cosmological simulations of galaxy formation Forgan, Duncan; Dayal, Pratika; Cockell, Charles; Libeskind, Noam Published in: International Journal of Astrobiology DOI: 10.1017/S1473550415000518 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Final author's version (accepted by publisher, after peer review) Publication date: 2017 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Forgan, D., Dayal, P., Cockell, C., & Libeskind, N. (2017). Evaluating galactic habitability using high- resolution cosmological simulations of galaxy formation. International Journal of Astrobiology, 16(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550415000518 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kepler Characterization of the Variability Among A- and F-Type Stars I
    A&A 534, A125 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117368 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics The Kepler characterization of the variability among A- and F-type stars I. General overview K. Uytterhoeven1,2,3,A.Moya4, A. Grigahcène5,J.A.Guzik6, J. Gutiérrez-Soto7,8,9, B. Smalley10, G. Handler11,12, L. A. Balona13,E.Niemczura14, L. Fox Machado15,S.Benatti16,17, E. Chapellier18, A. Tkachenko19, R. Szabó20, J. C. Suárez7,V.Ripepi21, J. Pascual7, P. Mathias22, S. Martín-Ruíz7,H.Lehmann23, J. Jackiewicz24,S.Hekker25,26, M. Gruberbauer27,11,R.A.García1, X. Dumusque5,28,D.Díaz-Fraile7,P.Bradley29, V. Antoci11,M.Roth2,B.Leroy8, S. J. Murphy30,P.DeCat31, J. Cuypers31, H. Kjeldsen32, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard32 ,M.Breger11,33, A. Pigulski14, L. L. Kiss20,34, M. Still35, S. E. Thompson36,andJ.VanCleve36 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 30 May 2011 / Accepted 29 June 2011 ABSTRACT Context. The Kepler spacecraft is providing time series of photometric data with micromagnitude precision for hundreds of A-F type stars. Aims. We present a first general characterization of the pulsational behaviour of A-F type stars as observed in the Kepler light curves of a sample of 750 candidate A-F type stars, and observationally investigate the relation between γ Doradus (γ Dor), δ Scuti (δ Sct), and hybrid stars. Methods. We compile a database of physical parameters for the sample stars from the literature and new ground-based observations. We analyse the Kepler light curve of each star and extract the pulsational frequencies using different frequency analysis methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists Discover Planetary System Orbiting Kepler-47 13 September 2012, by Dr
    Scientists discover planetary system orbiting Kepler-47 13 September 2012, by Dr. Tony Phillips "The presence of a full-fledged planetary system orbiting Kepler-47 is an amazing discovery," says Greg Laughlin, professor of Astrophysics and Planetary Science at the University of California in Santa Cruz. "This is going to change the way we think about the formation of planets." The inner planet, Kepler-47b, closely circles the pair of stars, completing each orbit in less than 50 days. Astronomers think it is a sweltering world, where the destruction of methane in its super- heated atmosphere might lead to a thick global haze. Kepler-47b is about three times the size of Earth. The outer planet, Kepler-47c, orbits every 303 days. This puts it in the system's habitable zone, a This diagram compares our own solar system to band of orbits that are "just right" for liquid water to Kepler-47, a double-star system containing two planets, exist on the surface of a planet. But does this one orbiting in the so-called "habitable zone." This is the sweet spot in a planetary system where liquid water planet even have a surface? Possibly not. The might exist on the surface of a planet. Credit: NASA/JPL- astronomers think it is a gas giant slightly larger Caltech/T. Pyle than Neptune. The discovery of planets orbiting double stars means that planetary systems are even weirder News flash: The Milky Way galaxy just got a little and more abundant than previously thought. weirder. Back in 2011 astronomers were amazed when NASA's Kepler spacecraft discovered a "Many stars are part of multiple-star systems where planet orbiting a double star system.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Should We Care About TRAPPIST-1?
    PUBLISHED: 27 MARCH 2017 | VOLUME: 1 | ARTICLE NUMBER: 0104 news & views EXOPLANETS Why should we care about TRAPPIST-1? The discovery of a system of six (possibly system we’ve found with terrestrial planets seven) terrestrial planets around the tightly packed together and in resonance. TRAPPIST-1 star, announced in a paper Their orbits are also all co-planar, as the by Michaël Gillon and collaborators image shows, and luckily for us this orbital (Nature 542, 456–460; 2017) attracted a plane passes through the line of sight great deal of attention from researchers between us and TRAPPIST-1: all these as well as the general public. Reactions planets are ‘transiting’. This is much more ranged from the enthusiastic — already than a simple technical detail, as it allows us hypothesizing a string of inhabited to characterize all their atmospheres — an planets — to those who felt that it essential step to understand their climate didn’t add anything substantial to our and propensity for habitability. current knowledge of exoplanets and Finally and maybe most importantly, was ultimately not worth the hype. The these planets are distributed over all of cover of the Nature issue hosting the the three zones related to different phases paper (pictured), made by Robert Hurt, (IPAC) HURT NASA/JPL-CALTECH/ROBERT of water, as cleverly represented by the a visualization scientist at Caltech, is a illustration. However, this information, fine piece of artwork, but it also helps us They can thus be called ‘terrestrial’ without linked to the concept of habitable or in assessing the actual relevance of the any qualms about terminology.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Habitability of Transiting Exoplanets
    Draft version October 1, 2015 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 04/17/13 COMPARATIVE HABITABILITY OF TRANSITING EXOPLANETS Rory Barnes1,2,3, Victoria S. Meadows1,2, Nicole Evans1,2 Draft version October 1, 2015 ABSTRACT Exoplanet habitability is traditionally assessed by comparing a planet’s semi-major axis to the location of its host star’s “habitable zone,” the shell around a star for which Earth-like planets can possess liquid surface water. The Kepler space telescope has discovered numerous planet candidates near the habitable zone, and many more are expected from missions such as K2, TESS and PLATO. These candidates often require significant follow-up observations for validation, so prioritizing planets for habitability from transit data has become an important aspect of the search for life in the universe. We propose a method to compare transiting planets for their potential to support life based on transit data, stellar properties and previously reported limits on planetary emitted flux. For a planet in radiative equilibrium, the emitted flux increases with eccentricity, but decreases with albedo. As these parameters are often unconstrained, there is an “eccentricity-albedo degeneracy” for the habitability of transiting exoplanets. Our method mitigates this degeneracy, includes a penalty for large-radius planets, uses terrestrial mass-radius relationships, and, when available, constraints on eccentricity to compute a number we call the “habitability index for transiting exoplanets” that represents the relative probability that an exoplanet could support liquid surface water. We calculate it for Kepler Objects of Interest and find that planets that receive between 60–90% of the Earth’s incident radiation, assuming circular orbits, are most likely to be habitable.
    [Show full text]