DOCSLIB.ORG

Blue Carbon Feasibility Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blue Carbon Feasibility Assessment ©Conservation International Photo by Remesa Lang NORTH BRAZIL SHELF MANGROVE PROJECT BLUE CARBON FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT DISCLAIMER The content of this report does not reflect the official opinion of the project sponsors or their partner organization. Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the author(s). SUGGESTED CITATION Beers, L., Crooks, S., May, C., and Mak, M. (2019) Setting the foundations for zero net loss of the mangroves that underpin human wellbeing in the North Brazil Shelf LME: Blue Carbon Feasibility Assessment. Report by Conservation International and Silvestrum Climate Associates. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 REPORT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................. 2 3 MANGROVE ECOLOGICAL STRUCTURE ........................................................................................ 2 3.1 MANGROVE SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES ........................................................................................................... 2 3.1.1 Stand Characterization and Propagation ............................................................................................................ 3 3.1.2 Degradation ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 MANGROVE ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION AND SERVICES .................................................................................... 5 3.2.1 Blue Carbon – Sequestration and Release .......................................................................................................... 6 3.2.2 Nursery and Habitat Function ............................................................................................................................. 6 3.2.3 Shoreline Protection and Accretion ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS STRUCTURING MANGROVES .............................................................................. 7 3.3.1 Salinity................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3.3.2 Inundation ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.4 MANGROVE PROTECTED AREAS ................................................................................................................. 9 4 MANGROVE STOCK QUANTIFICATION ......................................................................................... 10 4.1 TREE STOCKS .......................................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 SOIL CARBON STOCKS ............................................................................................................................. 12 4.3 METHANE EMISSIONS ............................................................................................................................... 13 4.4 NITROUS OXIDE EMISSIONS ...................................................................................................................... 13 4.5 MANGROVE AREA ESTIMATES ................................................................................................................... 13 4.6 MANGROVE DEFORESTATION CALCULATIONS ............................................................................................ 14 4.7 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................. 15 4.8 CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 21 5 CARBON FINANCING FEASIBILITY ................................................................................................ 21 5.1 CARBON PROJECT METHODOLOGIES ........................................................................................................ 21 5.1.1 Verified Carbon Standard .................................................................................................................................. 22 5.1.2 Plan Vivo ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 5.2 VOLUNTARY MARKETS ............................................................................................................................. 24 NORTH BRAZIL SHELF MANGROVE PROJECT | BLUE CARBON FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT i 5.3 MARKET CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 24 5.4 LANDSCAPE FEASIBILITY ........................................................................................................................... 25 5.5 METHODOLOGY APPLICABILITY ................................................................................................................. 25 5.5.1 Methodology for Tidal Wetland and Seagrass Restoration (VM0033) ............................................................. 25 5.5.2 REDD+ Methodology (VM0007) ........................................................................................................................ 26 5.6 ADDITIONALITY REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................ 28 5.7 GHG ACCOUNTING APPROACH ................................................................................................................ 28 5.8 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ............................................................................................................................. 29 5.9 LEGAL FEASIBILITY ................................................................................................................................... 29 5.10 ORGANIZATION FEASIBILITY ...................................................................................................................... 29 5.11 RELEVANCE TO THE NBS-LME ................................................................................................................. 30 6 NEXT STEPS ..................................................................................................................................... 35 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................................. 36 APPENDIX 1: MANGROVE CARBON STOCK SAMPLING PROTOCOL ............................................... 41 NORTH BRAZIL SHELF MANGROVE PROJECT | BLUE CARBON FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT ii TABLES TABLE 1. MANGROVE STRUCTURE FROM STANDS OF DIFFERENT AGES IN FRENCH GUIANA. ........................................... 5 TABLE 2. MANGROVE BIOMASS AND STOCKS AND SOIL CARBON STOCKS FROM MANGROVE STANDS OF DIFFERENT AGES IN FRENCH GUIANA, WITH ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE OF AREA FOR EACH. ............................................................. 11 TABLE 3. MANGROVE BIOMASS AND STOCKS AND SOIL CARBON STOCKS FROM MANGROVE STANDS OF DIFFERENT AGES IN FRENCH GUIANA, WITH ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE OF AREA FOR EACH. ............................................................. 12 TABLE 4. SOIL ACCRETION AND CARBON BURIAL RATES FOR MANGROVE STANDS OF VARYING AGES IN FRENCH GUIANA. ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12 TABLE 5. CARBON STOCK DATA FOR GUYANA USING MANGROVE AREA ESTIMATES FROM GLOBAL MANGROVE WATCH (2018). ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 TABLE 6. CARBON STOCK DATA FOR GUYANA IN 2000 USING MANGROVE AREA ESTIMATES FROM THE WORLD ATLAS OF MANGROVES (SPALDING ET AL. 2010) AND MANGROVE FORESTS OF THE WORLD (GIRI ET AL. 2010). ................. 16 TABLE 7. CARBON STOCK DATA FOR GUYANA USING MANGROVE AREA ESTIMATES FROM HAMILTON AND CASEY (2016). ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 TABLE 8. CARBON STOCK DATA FOR SURINAME USING MANGROVE AREA ESTIMATES FROM GLOBAL MANGROVE WATCH (2018). ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 TABLE 9. CARBON STOCK DATA FOR SURINAME IN 2000 USING MANGROVE AREA ESTIMATES FROM THE WORLD ATLAS OF MANGROVES (SPALDING ET AL. 2010) AND MANGROVE FORESTS OF THE WORLD (GIRI ET AL. 2010). ................. 18 TABLE 10. CARBON STOCK DATA FOR SURINAME USING MANGROVE AREA ESTIMATES FROM HAMILTON AND CASEY (2016). ...........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Bright Spot Story of Mangrove Restoration in Indonesia © 2014 Carlton Ward for the Nature Conservancy Nature the for Ward Carlton © 2014
    INFORMATION BRIEF THE MANGROVE RESTORATION POTENTIAL MAP The Mangrove Restoration Potential Map is a unique interactive tool developed to explore potential mangrove restoration areas worldwide and model the potential benefits associated with such restoration. The mapping tool was developed by The Nature Conservancy and IUCN, in collaboration with the University of Cambridge, and can be found on maps.oceanwealth.org/mangrove-restoration A Bright Spot Story of Mangrove Restoration in Indonesia © 2014 Carlton Ward for The Nature Conservancy Nature The for Ward Carlton © 2014 • Indonesia holds the largest area of Indonesia’s total mangrove cover) can be mangroves globally with 27,000 km2 restored, often on the sites of abandoned (2016) coverage. aquaculture ponds, according to the • Losses are occurring at a significant rate, Mangrove Restoration Potential Map. especially in Eastern regions, mainly to • The Map calculates projected returns from aquaculture. restoration for fisheries and storm protection • An estimated 1,866 km2 (about 6.4% of - both for local communities and businesses. Restoring Mangroves: Good for Livelihoods and Businesses Southeast Asia has the highest rate of This region also suffered considerable losses mangrove loss and degradation. The region prior to 1996, notably due to conversion to represents 40% of global losses and 60% of aquaculture across Indonesia, the Philippines degradation between 1996 to 2016. and Thailand, and due to the war in Vietnam. Among the greatest ongoing mangrove losses recently been lost: provided the driver for Examples of Small and Medium Scale are occurring in Eastern Indonesia due to rapid loss can be prevented from recurring and Restoration in Indonesia conversion of mangrove forests to aquaculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in Ndcs Acknowledgments Authors: Nureen F
    Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in NDCs Acknowledgments Authors: Nureen F. Anisha, Alex Mauroner, Gina Lovett, Arthur Neher, Marcel Servos, Tatiana Minayeva, Hans Schutten and Lucilla Minelli Reviewers: James Dalton (IUCN), Hans Joosten (Greifswald Mire Centre), Dianna Kopansky (UNEP), John Matthews (AGWA), Tobias Salathe (Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands), Eugene Simonov (Rivers Without Boundaries), Nyoman Suryadiputra (Wetlands International), Ingrid Timboe (AGWA) This document is a joint product of the Alliance for Global Water Adaptation (AGWA) and Wetlands International. Special Thanks The report was made possible by support from the Sector Program for Sustainable Water Policy of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) of the Federal Republic of Germany. The authors would also like to thank the Greifswald Mire Centre for sharing numerous resources used throughout the report. Suggested Citation Anisha, N.F., Mauroner, A., Lovett, G., Neher, A., Servos, M., Minayeva, T., Schutten, H. & Minelli, L. 2020.Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in NDCs. Corvallis, Oregon and Wageningen, The Netherlands: Alliance for Global Water Adaptation and Wetlands International. Table of Contents Foreword by Norbert Barthle 4 Foreword by Carola van Rijnsoever 5 Foreword by Martha Rojas Urrego 6 1. A Global Agenda for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation 7 1. 1. Achieving the Goals of the Paris Agreement 7 1.2. An Opportunity to Address Biodiversity and GHG Emissions Targets Simultaneously 8 2. Integrating Wetlands in NDC Commitments 9 2.1. A Time for Action: Wetlands and NDCs 9 2.2. Land Use as a Challenge and Opportunity 10 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Restoration and Management in Djibouti: ______
    Mangrove Restoration and Management in Djibouti: ___________________________________________________ Criteria and Conditions for Success Deidre B. Witsen December 17, 2012 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Master of Natural Resources Major: Natural Resources Graduate Committee: Dr. Heather Eves (Chair), Dr. Jennifer Jones, and Dr. Steven R. Sheffield Keywords: Mangroves, mangrove restoration, mangrove management, hydrological connections, habitat degradation, biodiversity The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USAID, or the United States Government. Deidre Witsen Mangrove Restoration and Management in Djibouti Page 1 Abstract The country of Djibouti, while faced with poverty, political instability, lack of human and financial capacity, health issues, a growing population, and water and food insecurity, has some important opportunities to implement a variety of different conservation projects. Mangrove restoration and management is one such endeavor that could result in a multitude of environmental, social, and economic benefits to the coastal communities of Djibouti. This paper provides background on the biodiversity and conservation goals of Djibouti, details general information about mangroves, explains the benefits that mangrove forests can provide, lists threats to mangrove forests, and discusses the state of mangroves in Djibouti. Next, through a case study approach, this paper summarizes other countries’ efforts
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration Success in Southeast Asia Penluck Laulikitnont University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-16-2014 Evaluation of Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration Success in Southeast Asia Penluck Laulikitnont University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Laulikitnont, Penluck, "Evaluation of Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration Success in Southeast Asia" (2014). Master's Projects and Capstones. 12. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/12 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This Master’s Project EVALUATION OF MANGROVE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION SUCCESS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA by Penluck Laulikitnont is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco Submitted: Received: ……………………………………….. ……………………………………….. Penluck Laulikitnont Date Gretchen Coffman, Ph. D. Date CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Restoration Potential: a Global Map Highlighting a Critical Opportunity
    Mangrove Restoration Potential: A global map highlighting a critical opportunity Mangrove Restoration Potential A global map highlighting a critical opportunity Thomas Worthington, Mark Spalding 1 Mangrove Restoration Potential: A global map highlighting a critical opportunity Mangrove Restoration Potential A global map highlighting a critical opportunity Thomas Worthington, Mark Spalding With: Kate Longley-Wood (The Nature Conservancy, Boston), Ben Brown (Charles Darwin University), Pete Bunting (Aberystwyth University), Nicole Cormier (Macquarie University), Amy Donnison (University of Cambridge), Clare Duncan (Deakin University), Lola Fatoyinbo (NASA), Dan Friess (National University of Singapore), Tomislav Hengl (EnvirometriX Ltd), Lammert Hilarides (Wetlands International), Ken Krauss (U.S. Geological Survey), David Lagomasino (University of Maryland), Patrick Leinenkugel (German Aerospace Center), Cath Lovelock (The University of Queensland), Richard Lucas (Aberystwyth University), Nick Murray (University of New South Wales), Siddharth Narayan (University of California, Santa Cruz), William Sutherland (University of Cambridge), Carl Trettin (USDA Forest Service), Dominic Wodehouse (Bangor University), Philine Zu Ermgassen (University of Edinburgh). Chapter 8 was prepared help from with Amy Donnison. Chapter 9 was prepared with help from Dorothee Herr, Swati Hingorani and Emily Landis. Acknowledgements: Nathalie Chalmers (The Nature Conservancy), Elmedina Krilasevic (IUCN), Pelayo Menendez (IH Cantabria), Casey Schneebeck (The Nature
    [Show full text]
  • Reforestation Vs. Natural Regeneration of Hurricane-Disturbed Mangrove Forests in Guanaja (Honduras)
    Article To Plant or Not to Plant, That Is the Question: Reforestation vs. Natural Regeneration of Hurricane-Disturbed Mangrove Forests in Guanaja (Honduras) Thomas Fickert Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Passau, Innstraße 40, D-94032 Passau, Germany; thomas.fi[email protected] Received: 24 August 2020; Accepted: 2 October 2020; Published: 6 October 2020 Abstract: Background and Objectives: Mangrove forests offer many essential ecosystem services, including the protection of (sub)tropical coastlines, their inhabitants, and the infrastructure from severe storms and tsunamis. However, mangroves themselves suffer severely from such phenomena. After such events, reforestation efforts are widely undertaken to facilitate the recovery of the mangroves. Many of these laborious activities, however, fail for a number of reasons. Material and Methods: In October 1998, the Honduran Island of Guanaja was severely hit by Hurricane Mitch, and, after the storm, almost all of the mangrove forests (97%) were rated as dead. Seven years after Mitch, a longterm survey on the regeneration of the mangroves started. Field samplings in six variably disturbed mangrove zones was conducted in 2005, 2009, and 2016. Along permanent line-transects, all living plant species were recorded for statistical analyses and for quantifying progress. In this paper, the focus is on the three most severely hit areas. In two of them, planting efforts were carried out while the third one was left to regenerate naturally. This setting allowed a direct comparison between natural and human-assisted regeneration processes under otherwise similar conditions and equally severe previous disturbance. Results: Reforestation measures were characterized by high mortality rates of Rhizophora mangle L.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Restoration Actions on Organic Carbon Pools in the Lagoon—Delta Ciénaga Grande De Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean
    water Article Effect of Restoration Actions on Organic Carbon Pools in the Lagoon—Delta Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean Laura Victoria Perdomo-Trujillo 1,* , Jose Ernesto Mancera-Pineda 2 , Jairo Humberto Medina-Calderón 1,3, David Alejandro Sánchez-Núñez 1 and Marie-Luise Schnetter 4 1 Instituto de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar–CECIMAR, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Caribe, Calle 25 No. 2-55, Playa Salguero, Santa Marta 470006, Colombia; [email protected] (J.H.M.-C.); [email protected] (D.A.S.-N.) 2 Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá, Carrera 45 No. 26-85, Bogotá D.C. 111321, Colombia; [email protected] 3 Unidad de Docencia y Formación, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Caribe, Jardín Botánico de San Andrés Harmoni Hall Hill, San Andrés 880001, Colombia 4 Institut für Botanik, Justus-Liebig-Universität, c/o HHA, Senckenbergstraße 17, 35390 Giessen, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Mangroves provide multiple ecosystem services and are essential for mitigating global warming owing to their capacity to store large carbon (C) stocks. Due to widespread mangrove degradation, actions have been implemented to restore them worldwide. An important representative case in Colombia is the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta’s restoration plan. This management Citation: Perdomo-Trujillo, L.V.; intervention focused on restoring the natural hydrological functioning after massive mangrove Mancera-Pineda, J.E.; Medina- mortality (~25,000 ha) due to soil hyper-salinization after river water input from the Magdalena River Calderón, J.H.; Sánchez-Núñez, D.A.; was eliminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Restoration: to Plant Or Not to Plant?
    Mangrove restoration: to plant or not to plant? Mangrove planting has become hugely popular. The majority of planting efforts are however failing. A more effective approach is to create the right conditions for mangroves to grow back naturally. Mangroves restored in this way generally survive and function better. This leaflet aims to contribute to best practice by exploring the question that everyone involved in mangrove restoration should ask: ‘To plant or not to plant?’ Key messages • The world needs mangroves, but in many parts of the world they have been lost or degraded, along with their valuable services like coastal protection or fisheries enhancement. Restoration is necessary in many places. • Mangrove planting is hugely popular, but the majority of planting efforts fail to restore functional mangrove forests and we can learn from these experiences. • Successful restoration results in the establishment of a sizeable, diverse, functional and self-sustaining mangrove forest that offers benefits for nature and people. • When the enabling biophysical and socio- economic conditions are put back in place applying Ecological Mangrove Restoration principles, nature will do the rest. When that happens, species to site matching is optimal, resulting in better survival, faster growth and a more diverse and resilient mangrove forest. • In some cases, planting can assist or enrich the natural regeneration process. However, non-mangrove habitat and areas showing natural mangrove recruitment need to be avoided. The world needs mangroves Recurring factors for failure include: Mangrove forests are under threat from many • Planting in areas where socio-economic conditions are development pressures: overharvesting, pollution, not right, because the local community is not involved, conversion for agriculture, aquaculture or urbanization, does not support the idea of conservation or because oil and gas industry and development of infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangroves As a Sustainable Coastal Defence
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hasanuddin University Repository Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Asian and Pacific Coasts (APAC 2013) Bali, Indonesia, September 24-26, 2013 MANGROVES AS A SUSTAINABLE COASTAL DEFENCE A.L. McIvor 1,2, I. Möller 2, T. Spencer 2 and M. Spalding 1 ABSTRACT: Mangroves effectively reduce the height of wind and swell waves over short distances (less than 500 m), and can reduce storm surge water levels over greater distances (several kilometres of mangroves). Thus mangroves can contribute to coastal defence strategies. However, their appropriate use depends on a thorough understanding of the conditions under which they can provide these coastal defence services. Here we present a literature review of this topic. Small wind and swell waves can be reduced in height by between 50 and 100% over 500 m of mangroves. Wave reduction largely depends on water depth and vegetation structure and density. However, few measurements are available for the reduction of bigger waves (> 70 cm in height) in deeper water (> 2 m). Storm surge water levels may be reduced by between 5 cm and 50 cm per kilometre of mangrove, based on field measurements and validated numerical models; water level reduction rates depend on the distance from the edge of the mangrove and the forward speed of the cyclone, amongst other factors. Extreme events may severely damage or destroy mangroves, reducing their effectiveness as a coastal defence. The use of mangroves in hybrid engineering can reduce flood risk: for example, a mangrove foreshore in front of a sea wall/dyke will reduce wave impacts on the wall/dyke.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Enhancement As a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy in the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI): Potential Ecosystem Service Shifts Following Colonization
    Mangrove Enhancement as a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy in the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI): Potential Ecosystem Service Shifts Following Colonization Prepared for LIVING ISLANDS, NGO By: Andrew S. Harwood M.S.; M.E.M. Portland State University, Department of Environmental Science and Management P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207, USA (LivingIslands.Org) 1 ABSTRACT The ability of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and Pacific Island communities to adapt to the increasing sea-levels, storm surge, saltwater intrusion, and other threats posed by global climate change is critical to the survival of many of these local communities as well as their cultures (LivingIslands.org). One of the world’s most striking examples of a nation at great risk is the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) in the central Pacific Ocean. Due to a combination of factors, including the country’s extremely low elevation above sea-level (an average of 2 meters) and lack of adequate structures to provide safety during extreme weather events, the RMI is expected to be severely impacted by the increased frequency and intensity of floods, droughts, coastal erosion, and elevated sea surface levels and temperatures predicted from global climate change models (IPCC, 2014). The broad objectives of this project are to 1) collect and review some of the most up-to- date scientific knowledge regarding the potential effects of introducing mangrove trees in local communities and ecosystems from around the globe and 2) to assist the Republic of the Marshall Islands in developing climate change adaptation (and natural resource management) strategies for the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Lessons on Mangrove Restoration
    Sharing Lessons on Mangrove Restoration Proceedings and a Call for Action from an MFF Regional Colloquium 30–31 August 2012, Mamallapuram, India The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Mangroves for the Future or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of Mangroves for the Future or IUCN. This publication has been made possible by funding from Norad and Sida. Mangroves for the Future would like to acknowledge the additional editorial contributions from Mr Jake Brunner, Dr D. T. Wettasinghe and Mr L. C. A. de S. Wijesinghe. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland with Mangroves for the Future, Bangkok, Thailand Copyright: © 2012 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is author- ized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Macintosh, D.J., Mahindapala, R., Markopoulos, M. (eds) (2012). Sharing Lessons on Mangrove Restoration. Bangkok, Thailand: Mangroves for the Future and Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1558-2
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the World's Mangrove Forests
    THE QUIET ACHIEVERS Restoring the world’s mangrove forests Martin Atkin Where the ocean meets the shore, where salt water meets fresh, mangroves stand with one foot in the water, one foot on land. “Love them or hate them, we all depend on mangroves and tidal wetlands. They have been the quiet achievers that have somehow adapted to fit among our everyday lives.” Mangroves are one of our best allies in the fight against climate change - yet we are doing nowhere near enough to protect them. THE QUIET ACHIEVERS They live where the ocean meets the shore, Mangroves are one of our best allies in as cyclones and storm surges. Their roots where salt water meets fresh. They stand with the fight against climate change - yet we shelter huge biodiversity of fish, crustaceans one foot in the water, one foot on land. are doing nowhere near enough to protect and shellfish, upon which some 200 million Washed twice a day by the tide, their roots them. “Mangroves have enormous capacity people depend on for their food and lifting them high and proud above the waves, for absorbing and retaining carbon dioxide livelihoods. mangroves protect us from storms, suck up and other greenhouse gases - and that’s most carbon from the atmosphere, provide a safe critical in today’s climate crisis,” says haven for endangered creatures and Professor Benjamin Horton, Director of the “Love them or hate them, we all depend on livelihoods for many millions of people. Earth Observatory of Singapore and co-author mangroves and tidal wetlands,” says Professor of a recent report on the threats to the world’s Norman Duke of James Cook University in Mangroves circle the globe like a blue-green mangroves.
    [Show full text]