Estonia External Relations Briefing: a Possible Critical Juncture: a Continuation E-MAP Foundation MTÜ

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Estonia External Relations Briefing: a Possible Critical Juncture: a Continuation E-MAP Foundation MTÜ ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 40, No. 4 (EE) May 2021 Estonia external relations briefing: A possible critical juncture: a continuation E-MAP Foundation MTÜ 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 A possible critical juncture: a continuation Closer to the end of May, a report came about on the European Parliament having voted “to freeze the legislative process for ratifying the EU’s investment pact with China”1. However, it was not the final news on the multi-faceted EU-China theme. In a day, Politico interviewed Gabrielius Landsbergis, Lithuania’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, who announced that “[t]here is no such thing as 17+1 anymore, as for practical purposes Lithuania is out”2. The media source noted that Lithuania “urged other EU countries to follow suit” and then further quoted the same Minister’s clarification of the decision made: From our perspective, it is high time for the EU to move from a dividing 16+1 format to a more uniting and therefore much more efficient 27+1. […] The EU is strongest when all 27 member states act together along with EU institutions. […] Vaccination rollout, tackling pandemics are just [a] few recent examples of the EU-27 united in solidarity and purpose. Unity of [the] 27 is key to success in EU's relations with external partners. Relations with China should be no exception.3 There was no surprise that China’s reaction on such a development appeared to be fast. Global Times quoted Liu Zuokui, an influential representative of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, who noted that the Baltic nation’s “withdrawal will have no impact on the 17+1 cooperation”, adding that “withdrawal can help reduce ‘some negative assets’ from the mechanism”4. What does this all mean for Estonia? From April 2012, when the then Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao went to Poland to initiate the 16+1 and express his country’s hope to “to double trade with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe to $100 billion a year by 2015”5, Estonia has been keeping a rather low profile 1 ‘European Parliament votes to ‘freeze’ investment deal with China’ in Business Standard, 21 May 2021. Available from [https://www.business-standard.com/article/international/european-parliament-votes-to-freeze- investment-deal-with-china-121052100053_1.html]. 2 Gabrielius Landsbergis as cited in Stuart Lau, ‘Lithuania pulls out of China’s ’17+1′ bloc in Eastern Europe’, Politico, 21 May 2021. Available from [https://www.politico.eu/article/lithuania-pulls-out-china-17-1-bloc- eastern-central-europe-foreign-minister-gabrielius-landsbergis/]. 3 Landsbergis as cited in Lau. 4 Liu Zuokui as cited in Chen Qingqing and Yang Kunyi, ‘Lithuania’s decision to quit China-CEEC 17+1 won’t change fundamentals of platform’, Global Times, 23 May 2021. Available from [https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202105/1224260.shtml]. 5 Melissa Eddy, ‘China Wants More Trade with Central and Eastern Europe’ in The New York Times, 26 April 2012. Available from [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/27/business/global/china-wants-more-trade-with- central-and-eastern-europe.html]. 1 in the China-designated cooperational framework, which, with the time, appeared to be yet another integral part (one of many) of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Objectively, via its BRI, China is trying to unify about all of the country’s foreign policy-associated directions, except its communicational channel with the United States. Within the framework, especially keeping in mind official Brussels’ initial 4-year-long ‘quietness’ in terms of expressing its reaction on the BRI, the EU as a politico-economic entity can be seen as just a destination for Chinese goods rather than a partner on the other side of the grand idea. However, this is where the EU started having a big problem with such an understanding, and this is where the EU- China communication is currently not having any visible successes. One may also argue that the shortcomings can be easily detected on either side – firstly, the EU’s true identity as a global actor is not quite comprehended in China, but it has also not been worked out properly by the EU as well; secondly, a relative level of stability in trade (when, in the pre-pandemic era, the EU and China were enjoying a mind-blowing one billion a day trading activity) does not necessarily mean a true geo-strategic ‘love’ existing between the two parties. In short, China is at the position that it has no right to even think that it can possibly fail with the BRI, the EU is still searching for its identity to be projected clearly to the international community, and countries like Estonia are left with the single option to stick with the most reliable frameworks they have access to and the most loyal partners they have been friendly with for decades. It appears to be a simple observation, but it has plenty of empirical evidence to support itself. Interestingly enough, however, Estonia’s export to China has, indeed, nearly doubled from 2012, reaching USD 281.97 million during 20206, while China’s exporting trend to Estonia is going downhill (USD 864.08 million in 2020, or nearly 1.5 less than it was in the same 20127). One could argue that Estonia’s success in selling more to China cannot be entirely, if at all, attributed to the country’s quasi-participation in the 16/17+1. After all, there are many other methods to introduce Estonia’s products to different markets, including the vast market of the world’s most populous country. At the same time, one cannot deny some tangible effectiveness received by Estonia-based producers of good out of the Chinese government-promoted attempt to welcome more importers into the country, for example, via China International Import Expo in Shanghai (even though Estonian manufacturers and service providers have never been seen in high numbers over there). 6 ‘Estonia exports to China’ in Trading Economics. Available from [https://tradingeconomics.com/estonia/exports/china]. 7 ‘China exports to Estonia’ in in Trading Economics. Available from [https://tradingeconomics.com/china/exports/Estonia]. 2 Suddenly, the pandemic has managed to irreversibly change the global political economy, significantly adjusting the EU-China relations and outlining the obvious – the two sides, while treating each other as strategic partners because of enormous trade, have never had a sincere conversation on each other’s geo-strategic intentions. In a way, it should not be considered an ‘unfinished’ discussion, because, objectively speaking, the actual talk has not even started. As it was already mentioned, for Estonia, in the absence of the EU’s common vision on the issue, there had been only one option left to be utilised – to try to comprehend the situation from its own, security-focused, perspective, considering its full membership in both NATO and the EU. The fact that one of the world’s major powers from Asia is trying to designate a region in Europe to cooperate with seemed rather extravagant for many decision-makers in Estonia. Back in August 2020, Urmas Reinsalu, the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, noted that Estonia is planning to “reinterpret the meaning of 17+1 in the near future”8. No decision on whether to stay in or leave the framework was made then, and, in February 2021, Eva-Maria Liimets, Reinsalu’s immediate successor, was planning to “definitely be present for the [then upcoming 17+1 summit]”9. Characteristically for that particular high-level summit and knowing that China would definitely prefer for the framework’s participants to be represented by either Presidents or Prime Ministers, the Estonian delegation was headed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and a similar stance was adopted by Bulgaria and Slovenia (they sent Deputy Prime Ministers) and Lithuania and Romania (they sent other Ministers)10. On the Chinese side, President Xi Jinping represented the highest level of his massive country’s executive power. This representational disbalance clearly showed that the 17+1 became unstable, losing even the ephemeral ground it had before the pandemic. There is a likelihood that the Lithuanian demarche, which made the 17+1 dropping one point of the left side, can become a serious catalyst for further re-designing of what has now become the 16+1 framework. Most probably, this development, with necessity, will mean a more articulated ‘presence’ of the Three Seas Initiative in the same region, while China is likely to start concentrating more on the outer-EU ‘space’ – Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and, possibly, Montenegro and Albania. The latter two are NATO members, 8 Urmas Reinsalu as cited in ‘Reinsalu hints at Estonia's possible withdrawal from China's 17+1 format’, ERR, 26 August 2021. Available from [https://news.err.ee/1127434/reinsalu-hints-at-estonia-s-possible-withdrawal-from- china-s-17-1-format]. 9 Eva-Maria Liimets as cited in ‘Liimets says Estonia to attend 17+1 meeting with China’, ERR, 4 February 2021. Available from [https://news.err.ee/1608097300/liimets-says-estonia-to-attend-17-1-meeting-with-china]. 10 ‘Expert: Estonia right in distancing itself from 17+1 format’ in ERR, 10 February 2021. Available from [https://news.err.ee/1608104242/expert-estonia-right-in-distancing-itself-from-17-1-format]. 3 which will be making the ‘story’ even more complicated. On the Estonian case, the country’s Prime Minister Kaja Kallas once mentioned that Estonia’s previous Governments used to attend the past 16/17+1 summits on the prime-ministerial level, but now the strategy is rather different: In its relations with China, Estonia prefers bilateral cooperation and operating in the EU 27+1 format that enables the development of relations on the basis of EU unity, based on the EU’s common values and interests.
Recommended publications
  • European Young Leaders (Eyl40) 21St Century Pioneers: Inter-Regional Cooperation for a New Generation
    SEPTEMBER 2017 EUROPEAN YOUNG LEADERS (EYL40) 21ST CENTURY PIONEERS: INTER-REGIONAL COOPERATION FOR A NEW GENERATION TALLINN SEMINAR Report of the three-day seminar EUROPEAN young L EADERS The European Young Leaders (EYL40) programme led by Friends of Europe is a unique, inventive and multi-stakeholder programme that aims to promote a European identity by engaging the continent’s most promising talents in initiatives that will shape Europe’s future. The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. With the support of SEPTEMBER 2017 EUROPEAN YOUNG LEADERS (EYL40) 21ST CENTURY PIONEERS: INTER-REGIONAL COOPERATION FOR A NEW GENERATION TALLINN SEMINAR Report of the three-day seminar EUROPEAN young L EADERS EUROPEAN YOUNG LEADERS This report reflects the seminar rapporteur’s understanding of the views expressed by participants. These views are not necessarily those of the organisations that participants represent, nor of Friends of Europe, its board of trustees, members or partners. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted, provided that full credit is given to Friends of Europe, and that any such reproduction, whether in whole or in part, is not sold unless incorporated in other works. Rapporteurs: Paul Ames Publisher: Geert Cami Director of Programmes & Operations: Nathalie Furrer Senior Events Manager:
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Whoiswho Official Directory of the European Union
    EUROPEAN UNION EU WHOISWHO OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN COUNCIL 14/09/2021 Managed by the Publications Office © European Union, 2021 FOP engine ver:20180220 - Content: Anninter export. Root entity 1, all languages. - X15splt1,v170601 - X15splt2,v161129 - Just set reference language to EN (version 20160818) - Removing redondancy and photo for xml for pdf(ver 20201206,execution:2021-09-14T18:03:57.732+02:00 ) - convert to any LV (version 20170103) - NAL countries.xml ver (if no ver it means problem): 20210616-0 - execution of xslt to fo code: 2021-09-14T18:04:06.239+02:00- linguistic version EN - NAL countries.xml ver (if no ver it means problem):20210616-0 rootentity=EURCOU Note to the reader: The personal data in this directory are provided by the institutions, bodies and agencies of EU. The data are presented following the established order where there is one, otherwise by alphabetical order, barring errors or omissions. It is strictly forbidden to use these data for direct marketing purposes. If you detect any errors, please report them to: [email protected] Managed by the Publications Office © European Union, 2021 Reproduction is authorised. For any use or reproduction of individual photos, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. LIST OF BUILDINGS (CODES) Code City Adress DAIL Brussels Crèche Conseil Avenue de la Brabançonne 100 / Brabançonnelaan 100 JL Brussels Justus Lipsius Rue de la Loi 175 / Wetstraat 175 L145 Brussels Lex Rue de la Loi 145 / Wetstraat 145 EUROPEAN COUNCIL – 14/09/2021 – 3 BRUSSELS 4 – 14/09/2021 – OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BRUSSELS EUROPEAN COUNCIL – 14/09/2021 – 5 LUXEMBOURG – Kirchberg Plateau 6 – 14/09/2021 – OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION LUXEMBOURG – Gare and Cloche d’or STRASBOURG EUROPEAN COUNCIL – 14/09/2021 – 7 European Council President 9 Members 9 Cabinet of the President 10 8 – 14/09/2021 – OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION European Council Rue de la Loi 175 / Wetstraat 175 1048 Bruxelles / Brussel BELGIUM Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereignty 2.0
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2021 Sovereignty 2.0 Anupam Chander Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Haochen Sun University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2404 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3904949 This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Computer Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Sovereignty 2.0 Anupam Chander* and Haochen Sun** Digital sovereignty—the exercise of control over the internet—is the ambition of the world’s leaders, from Australia to Zimbabwe, a bulwark against both foreign state and foreign corporation. Governments have resoundingly answered first-generation internet law questions of who if anyone should regulate the internet—they all will. We now confront second generation questions—not whether, but how to regulate the internet. We argue that digital sovereignty is simultaneously a necessary incident of democratic governance and democracy’s dreaded antagonist. As international law scholar Louis Henkin taught us, sovereignty can insulate a government’s worst ills from foreign intrusion. Assertions of digital sovereignty, in particular, are often double-edged—useful both to protect citizens and to control them. Digital sovereignty can magnify the government’s powers by making legible behaviors that were previously invisible to the state. Thus, the same rule can be used to safeguard or repress--a feature that legislators across the Global North and South should anticipate by careful checks and balances.
    [Show full text]
  • The New European Parliament: a Look Ahead
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: A LOOK AHEAD JUNE 2019 THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: A LOOK AHEAD More than 200 million EU citizens cast their votes between 23 and 26 May 2019 to choose the next cohort of MEPs. The new European Parliament is characterised by increased fragmentation and therefore a greater role for smaller parties. This briefing provides an overview of the The pro-European wave evidenced by the election results, explains what to expect rise of ALDE&R and the Greens coincided in the years to come and considers how with a sharp and unprecedented increase the new alignment of political groups will in voter engagement. Since the late 1970s, affect the EU’s balance of power. The turnout for the European elections had briefing also includes national steadily gone down, reaching a historic perspectives from Bulgaria, France, low of 43% in 2014. At 51%, this year’s Germany and the UK. In addition, we look turnout might be a significant outlier – or it at some of the key incoming and could show that, in an age of Brexit, outgoing MEPs and present a timeline of nationalism and climate change, the EU upcoming institutional changes. may yet have something unique to offer. The election results What to expect from the The 2019 elections marked the beginning 2019-2024 European of a new era: for the first time in the Parliament Parliament’s 40-year history, the two major A more collaborative Parliament parties have lost their majority. The centre- With the two biggest groups – the EPP right European People’s Party (EPP), and S&D – having shed seats and lost though still the largest group, saw the their combined absolute majority, the greatest reduction in seats, with the duopoly of power has been broken with centre-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D) smaller groups hoping this will be to their losing a similar number of MEPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the European Council
    Changes in the European Council Composition and party affiliation when Ursula von der Leyen was proposed as candidate for Commission President (special session June/July 2019) no voting rights President President of High Representative of the EC the EUCO of the EU Jean-Claude Donald Federica Juncker Tusk Mogherini Bulgarien Boyko Slovakia Croatia Borissow Peter Pellegrini Portugal Andrej Plenković António Costa Germany Malta Angela Merkel Joseph Muscat Ireland Sweden Leo Varadkar Stefan Löfven Hungary Spain Viktor Orbán Pedro Sánchez Latvia Denmark Krišjānis Mette Frederiksen Kariņš Romania Finland Sponsored by the Federal Foreign Office Klaus Antti Rinne | Johannis Estonia Cyprus Jüri Ratas Nicos Anastasiades Burak Korkmaz Greece Alexis Tsipras Design: Slovenia Marjan Šarec Austria Czech Republic Andrej Babiš Brigitte Bierlein Italy The Netherlands Giuseppe Lithuania Belgium Mark Rutte Conte Luxembourg Charles Michel Dalia Poland United France Grybauskaitė Xavier Bettel Mateusz Kingdom Emmanuel Morawiecki Theresa May Macron European Council and Wikipedia| Party affiliation (voting members only) | Source: | Source: 9 7 7 3 2 1 0 European Party of European Renew Europe - Independent European Party of the European People's Party Socialists (PES) (ALDE, EDP, LREM) Conservatives and European Left Green Party (EGP) 19/03/2021 (EPP) Reformists (ECR) (PEL) Date: Changes in the European Council Composition and party affiliation March 2021 no voting rights President President of High Representative of the EC the EUCO of the EU Ursula Charles Joseph von
    [Show full text]
  • European Climate and Energy Experts
    Journalism for the energy transition EXPERT EUROPEAN CLIMATE AND ENERGY EXPERTS Filters: Expert Type: Any, Topic: Elections & Politics, Location: Any Progressive, social-liberal, pro-European and green political party. Not represented in Parliament. Twitter: @progresivne_sk Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Media office [email protected] Ľ Far-right neo-Nazi political party. Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Office [email protected] ľ Conservative liberal political party. Twitter: @Veronika_Remis Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Press office [email protected] Liberal and libertarian political party. Eurosceptic, advocates the liberalisation of drug laws and same-sex marriage. Rejects strict solutions to climate change. Member of the governing coalition. Twitter: @stranasas Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Ondrej Šprlák, spokesperson [email protected] +421 910579204 Right-wing populist political party opposed to mass immigration. Second largest party in the governing coalition. Twitter: @SmeRodina Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Office [email protected] +421 910444676 Led by former Prime Minister Robert Fico, left-wing populist and nationalist party with a socially conservative and anti-immigration stance. Twitter: @SmerSk Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Press office [email protected] Ľ Won the last election and is the largest party in the governing coalition. Non-standard party without fixed party structures. Twitter: @i_matovic Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Peter Dojčan, media officer [email protected] Largest political party in terms of public support. Since the last election, it is represented by 11 deputies in Parliament. Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Patrícia Medveď Macíková, spokesperson [email protected] +421 91716221 Social-liberal and populist party, one of the two largest political parties in Estonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Laigualdaddegénero,Motordelcambio La Recuperación De La Crisis De La Covid Será También Una Prueba Para Los Derechos De La Mujer
    La Vanguardia 08/03/21 Cod: 137545614 España Pr: Diaria Tirada: 65.922 Dif: 50.776 Pagina: 27 Secc: SOCIEDAD Valor: 30.891,02 € Area (cm2): 685,9 Ocupac: 69,42 % Doc: 1/1 Autor: Num. Lec: 480000 DÍAINTERNACIONALDELAMUJER Laigualdaddegénero,motordelcambio La recuperación de la crisis de la covid será también una prueba para los derechos de la mujer ste año tenemos un gramos liberar todo el poten- día internacional cial económico y empresarial de la Mujer espe- de las mujeres, nuestros esfuer- cial. No solo han zos de recuperación conduci- pasado exacta- rán a economías y sociedades Emente 110 años desde el primer más fuertes y resilientes. día internacional de la Mujer, En tercer lugar, debemos in- cuando más de un millón de tensificar nuestros esfuerzos mujeres y hombres unieron sus internacionales. Las mujeres y fuerzas y alzaron la voz por la las niñas suelen ser las prime- igualdad de derechos. ras víctimas durante las crisis. También estamos ante un Esto no fue diferente para esta importante punto de inflexión pandemia. La grave crisis de sa- el 8 de marzo de este año. Du- lud ha puesto de manifiesto la rante el año pasado, muchas de posiciónvulnerabledelasniñas nuestras vidas se han visto de- y las mujeres en muchas partes tenidas temporalmente por la del mundo, especialmente en peor crisis de salud en genera- los estados frágiles y afectados ciones. Al estar a la vanguardia por conflictos. Es importante en la lucha contra la pandemia que la nueva administración de en nuestros hospitales y resi- Estados Unidos vuelva a sen- dencias de ancianos, las muje- tarse con nosotros para comba- res se vieron afectadas de ma- tir, juntos, por los derechos de nera desproporcionada por la las niñas y las mujeres en todo pandemia; pagaron un precio el mundo.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Forecast
    July 2021 Monthly Forecast 1 Overview Overview 1 In Hindsight: the UNSC and Climate Change In July, France will have the presidency of the African issues anticipated in July include meet- 3 Status Update Security Council. Meetings are expected to be ings on: held in person this month. • DRC, on progress towards implementing the 5 Syria As a signature event of its presidency, France mandate of the UN Organization Stabilization 6 Democratic Republic of has chosen to convene a ministerial level brief- Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO); the Congo ing on preserving humanitarian space under the • West Africa and the Sahel, the biannual brief- 7 West Africa and the protection of civilians agenda item. Jean-Yves Le ing on the UN Office in West Africa and the Sahel Drian, France’s Minister for Europe and Foreign Sahel (UNOWAS); 9 Colombia Affairs, will chair the meeting. Secretary-Gener- • Libya, a ministerial-level briefing chaired by 11 Yemen al António Guterres; Robert Mardini, the Direc- the French Minister for Europe and Foreign 12 Libya tor-General of the International Committee of Affairs, Jean Yves Le Drian, on the UN Sup- the Red Cross; and Lucile Grosjean, the Del- port Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) and recent 13 Cyprus egate Director of Advocacy at Action Against developments; and 15 Preserving Hunger, are the anticipated briefers. • Darfur, on the drawdown and closure of Humanitarian Space The Council is planning to vote on a resolution the UN/AU Hybrid Operation in Darfur 16 Lebanon to renew the cross-border humanitarian assis- (UNAMID). 17 UNRCCA tance delivery mechanism in Syria, which expires The Council also expects to vote on a reso- 19 Sudan on 10 July.
    [Show full text]
  • Here: on Hate Speech
    They are brazen, feral, anthropoids that de- mand pay without work and collect sickness ben- efits without being sick. US / THEM They receive child benefits for chil- dren Hate Speech at the Service of Politics that play with pigs on the street, and for women that have the instincts of stray dogs * / edited by Miłosz Hodun LGBT migrants Roma Muslims Jews refugees national minorities asylum seekers ethnic minorities foreign workers black communities feminists NGOs women Africans church human rights activists journalists leftists liberals linguistic minorities politicians religious communities Travelers US / THEM European Liberal Forum Projekt: Polska US / THEM Hate Speech at the Service of Politics edited by Miłosz Hodun 132 Travelers 72 Africans migrants asylum seekers religious communities women 176 Muslims migrants 30 Map of foreign workers migrants Jews 162 Hatred refugees frontier workers LGBT 108 refugees pro-refugee activists 96 Jews Muslims migrants 140 Muslims 194 LGBT black communities Roma 238 Muslims Roma LGBT feminists 88 national minorities women 78 Russian speakers migrants 246 liberals migrants 8 Us & Them black communities 148 feminists ethnic Russians 20 Austria ethnic Latvians 30 Belgium LGBT 38 Bulgaria 156 46 Croatia LGBT leftists 54 Cyprus Jews 64 Czech Republic 72 Denmark 186 78 Estonia LGBT 88 Finland Muslims Jews 96 France 64 108 Germany migrants 118 Greece Roma 218 Muslims 126 Hungary 20 Roma 132 Ireland refugees LGBT migrants asylum seekers 126 140 Italy migrants refugees 148 Latvia human rights refugees 156 Lithuania 230 activists ethnic 204 NGOs 162 Luxembourg minorities Roma journalists LGBT 168 Malta Hungarian minority 46 176 The Netherlands Serbs 186 Poland Roma LGBT 194 Portugal 38 204 Romania Roma LGBT 218 Slovakia NGOs 230 Slovenia 238 Spain 118 246 Sweden politicians church LGBT 168 54 migrants Turkish Cypriots LGBT prounification activists Jews asylum seekers Europe Us & Them Miłosz Hodun We are now handing over to you another publication of the Euro- PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lithuania), Arturs Krišjānis Kariņš (Latvia), Kaja Kallas (Estonia) and Mateusz Morawiecki (Poland) on the Hybrid Attack on Our Borders by Belarus
    Statement of the Prime Ministers Ingrida Šimonytė (Lithuania), Arturs Krišjānis Kariņš (Latvia), Kaja Kallas (Estonia) and Mateusz Morawiecki (Poland) on the hybrid attack on our borders by Belarus. We, the Prime Ministers of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland, express our grave concern regarding the situation on the borders of Lithuania, Latvia and Poland with Belarus. It is clear to us that the ongoing crisis has been planned and systemically organized by the regime of Alexander Lukashenka. Using immigrants to destabilize neighbouring countries constitutes a clear breach of the international law and qualifies as a hybrid attack against the Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and thus against the entire European Union. In such situation, unprecedented for our region, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland value the clear commitment by the EU and it’s Member States to stand together in protecting the EU’s external border. Unity and urgent diplomatic, financial and technical support by the EU and its Member States is key to responding effectively to the challenge posed by the Lukashenka´s regime. It is equally important to jointly use all available diplomatic and practical means to cut the new irregular migration routes at its inception, as soon as possible. In the EU we need to use this momentum to rethink our approach towards the protection of our borders. We firmly believe that the protection of European external border is not just the duty of individual Member States but also the common responsibility of the EU. Hence, proper political attention should be paid to it on the EU level and sufficient funding allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens Are Still Fond of ‘Europe’: Its Values, Culture and Social Model
    PROGRAMME The European Young Leaders Class of 2017 will meet for the Drst time from 16 to 18 March 2017 in Portugal. The seminar takes place almost 60 years to the day since six governments signed the Treaty of Rome, the founding agreement of what would later become the European Union. The Treaty put in place the principles of free movement of labour, goods, services and capital. It also launched Europe on a journey – of varying pace – towards closer integration of its governments and peoples, through a series of treaties and agreements. But since the Lisbon Treaty was signed in 2007, progress has faltered – and even been reversed. There have been no more treaties; the United Kingdom has voted to leave the EU; and the ‘four freedoms’ have been put in question. Is the whole project under threat? Europe’s challenges are many and complex – but not insuperable. Most European citizens are still fond of ‘Europe’: its values, culture and social model. But they lack trust in its leaders, whom they see as disconnected from their daily reality and unable to tackle the challenges Europe faces. The prime objective of the seminar is to create bonds of trust between the young leaders so as to stimulate collaborative actions between them for the better of the EU and our societies. The European project is under threat from the rise of populism and post-fact politics. But can Europe use this crisis to change and focus on improving how it works, on educating people about the basic principles, on delivering tangible results and better communicating its successes? And while there is currently an atmosphere of doom sown by acts of terrorism, uncertainty about the United States’ stances on global issues such as defence, trade and climate change under Donald Trump, and threats to the liberal democratic order, the European Union remains a historically successful project.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAYING OINA with the Romanian Presidency
    PLAYING OINA WITH the Romanian Presidency 1 Table of contents INTERVIEW OF Siegfried Muresan, MEP (EPP) ` 4­7 PRIORITIES OF THE Romanian PRESIDENCY 8­10 POLITICAL CALENDAR FOR THE NExT SIx MONTHS 10­11 wHAT ABOUT Romania? 12­17 Some useful words 18 Let's play OinA! 19 3 relationship between the EU and the UK. Climate change is a crucial global challenge INTERVIEW OF Siegfried MureSan This new relationship, which will probably that asks for a European solution for the be a trade agreement, should guarantee future of our planet. My political family, the Romanian EPP MEP ` that the interests of EU citizens and EPP, is very much aware of the challenges businesses are preserved. we are facing in terms of global warming Hot Topics and CO2 emissions. We believe that Europe Last October, the Intergovernmental must engage with its international partners On November 14th, the European Panel on Climate Change released a very to internationally binding climate change Parliament adopted its position on the alarming report highlighting a number of agreements and invest in innovative, safe, Multinational Financial Framework (MFF) climate change impacts that could be and sustainable low-carbon energy post 2020. At Council level, there are still avoided by limiting global warming to technologies that minimise our dependency remaining sticking points. What are the 1.5ºC compared to 2ºC. Global human- to fossil fuels. The reduction of CO2 ambitions of the Romanian Presidency caused emissions of CO2 would need to emissions is crucial, but must be done at a with regard to the adoption of the MFF fall by about 45% from 2010 levels by realistic pace and while protecting post 2020? Would its adoption still be 2030, reaching ‘net zero’ around 2050.
    [Show full text]