DOCSLIB.ORG

Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR WILDLIFE REHABILITATION Third Edition, 2000 Edited by Erica A. Miller, DVM International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation, 2000, NWRA & IWRC Page 1 Copyright © 2000 by National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association and International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council All rights reserved Individual pages or sections (not to exceed 5 pages) of this work may be quoted or copied for purposes of research or rehabilitation as long as attribution is displayed, clearly showing footers and page numbers Preferred citation: Miller, E.A., editor. 2000. Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation, 3rd edition. National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association, St. Cloud, MN. 77 pages. First Edition published 1989 Second Edition published 1993 Third Edition published 2000 ISBN 1-931439-00-1 International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association 4437 Central Place Suite B-4 14 North 7th Avenue Suisun, CA 94585-1633 USA St. Cloud, MN 56303-4766 USA (707) 864-1761 (320) 259-4086 [email protected] [email protected] www.iwrc-online.org www.nwrawildlife.org Page 2 Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation, 2000, IWRC & NWRA ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The wildlife rehabilitators listed below have designed the various sections of this document. Their task was to compose a document and then reach a consensus with colleagues and the Boards of Directors of the National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association and International Wild- life Rehabilitation Council. This was no small task, and we thank them for their many efforts. Special thanks to the chairs of the Standards Committees, Erica Miller (NWRA) and Robyn Graboski (IWRC), as well as Marnie Allbritten, Lisa Borgia, Sue Coulson, Lessie Davis, Bea Orendorff, Louise Shimmel, and Elaine Thrune, whose editing helped make the document clear and understandable. Typesetting and layout was done by John Frink and Erica Miller. The concept of standards for wildlife rehabilitation and much of the original work was accom- plished in the early 1980s by: Pat Adams, Curt Clumpner, Betsy Crozer, Mary Forness, Lynne Frink, Pixie and Robert Goodrich, Michelle Green, IWRC Board of Directors 1982 & 1983, Susan Kelly, John Mulder, Carol Odel, Vaughan Pratt, Basil Tangredi, Kris Thorne-Bolduc, Jan White, and Linda Wolf. The third edition of Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation has resulted from the suggestions and contributions of many wildlife rehabilitators via letters, phone calls, e-mail messages, and conversations at national and regional conferences. Significant contributions were made by the following individuals: Wendy Aeschliman, Lori Arent, Ann Bradshaw, Susan Barnard, Allan & Shirley Casey, Curt Clumpner, Michael Cox, Lessie Davis, Marge Gibson, Robyn Graboski, Deirdre Goodfriend, Frank Gould, Sandy Heyn, Patrice Klein, Amanda Lollar, Daniel Ludwig, Bea Orendorff, Clyde Peeling, Mike Pratt, Louise Shimmel, Barbara Suto, Florina Tseng and Regina Whitman. A special note of gratitude goes to Marlys Bulander of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Migra- tory Bird Permit Office for reviewing this document. The National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association would like to acknowledge the generous support of the Kenneth A. Scott Charitable Trust, a KeyBank Trust. The Trust’s grant provided support funding for publication of the third edition of Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabili- tation. Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation, 2000, NWRA & IWRC Page 3 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... 6 CODE OF ETHICS............................................................................................................................. 7 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENTS ........................................................................................... 8 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE ............................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 1 - MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION PROCESS................................10 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................10 1.2 Minimum Care Requirements ............................................................................................. 11 1.3 Recording & Reporting Requirements...............................................................................14 1.4 Statistical Standards ............................................................................................................16 1.5 Veterinary Policy...................................................................................................................17 1.6 Wildlife Rehabilitation Facilities Review............................................................................18 Chapter 2 - DISEASE CONTROL ..................................................................................................19 2.1 Rationale for Disease Control ............................................................................................19 2.2 Prevention of Disease Transmission .................................................................................19 2.3 Standards to Prevent Disease Transmission within the Facility .....................................20 2.3.1 Control of Diseases Transmissible from Animals to Humans ................................20 2.3.2 Control of Diseases Transmissible from Animal to Animal ....................................20 2.3.3 Public Health Responsibilities ...................................................................................21 2.3.4 Release Considerations ............................................................................................22 2.3.5 Disposal of Carcasses and Animal Waste Products ..............................................22 2.4 Disinfection ...........................................................................................................................24 2.4.1 Definition of Common Terms .....................................................................................24 2.4.2 Types of Cleaning Agents ..........................................................................................24 Chapter 3 - BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR HOUSING ANIMALS .............................................29 3.1 Overview................................................................................................................................29 3.2 Cage Size Criteria Based on Medical Status ...................................................................30 3.2.1 Restricted Activity/Mobility .........................................................................................31 3.2.2 Limited Activity/Mobility ..............................................................................................31 3.2.3 Unlimited Activity/Mobility...........................................................................................31 3.3 Natural History/Behavior ......................................................................................................32 3.4 General Indoor Caging/Housing .........................................................................................32 3.5 General Outdoor Caging/Housing ......................................................................................32 Chapter 4 - AVIAN HOUSING REQUIREMENTS .........................................................................34 4.1 Overview................................................................................................................................34 4.1.1 General Avian Housing Considerations ...................................................................34 4.1.2 Construction Materials ................................................................................................34 4.1.3 Flooring Considerations .............................................................................................34 4.1.4 General Avian Furnishings .........................................................................................35 Page 4 Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation, 2000, IWRC & NWRA 4.2 Housing for Songbirds .........................................................................................................35 4.2.1 General Songbird Housing Considerations .............................................................35 4.2.2 Construction Materials ................................................................................................35 4.2.3 Furnishings ..................................................................................................................36 4.3 Housing for Waterbirds ........................................................................................................39 4.3.1 General Waterbird Housing Considerations ............................................................39 4.3.2 Construction Materials ................................................................................................39 4.3.3 Furnishings ..................................................................................................................39 4.4 Housing for Raptors .............................................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Description
    Chapter 1: Project Description A. INTRODUCTION The American Museum of Natural History (AMNH or the Museum) is seeking discretionary actions in connection with a proposed new building, the Richard Gilder Center for Science, Education, and Innovation (the Gilder Center). The Gilder Center would be an approximately 105-foot-tall (five stories above grade; taking into account mechanical and elevator bulkheads, a portion of the rooftop would reach 115 feet), approximately 203,000 gross-square-foot (gsf) addition located on the Columbus Avenue side of the Museum campus. Because the building would be integrated into the Museum complex, an additional approximately 42,000 gsf of existing space would be renovated to accommodate the program and make connections into the new building, for a total of approximately 245,000 gsf of new construction and renovation. Alterations also would be made to adjacent portions of Theodore Roosevelt Park. The Gilder Center, together with these other alterations, is the project proposed to be implemented by the Museum. Approximately 80 percent of the square footage of the project would be located within the area currently occupied by the Museum. Three existing buildings within the Museum complex would be removed to minimize the footprint on land that is now open space in Theodore Roosevelt Park, to about 11,600 square feet (approximately a quarter acre). The Museum is located on the superblock bounded by West 81st Street, West 77th Street, Central Park West, and Columbus Avenue, in the Upper West Side neighborhood of Manhattan (Block 1130, Lot 1). The Museum is located in Theodore Roosevelt Park, which is City-owned parkland under the jurisdiction of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (NYC Parks).
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Biology of Tortoises
    The Conservation Biology of Tortoises Edited by Ian R. Swingland and Michael W. Klemens IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group and The Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) No. 5 IUCN—The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC 3. To cooperate with the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the in developing and evaluating a data base on the status of and trade in wild scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biological flora and fauna, and to provide policy guidance to WCMC. diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species of 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their con- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna servation, and for the management of other species of conservation concern. and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, sub- vation of species or biological diversity. species, and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintain- 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: ing biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and vulnerable species. • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of biological diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conserva- tion Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitor- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of the River Ecosystem
    Biodiversity of 1 the river Module: ecosystem Impacts of human intervention on river ecosystem River Management Total duration: > 18 hours Brief description Field work: Yes (mainly) This learning unit refers to the Megalo Rema in List of materials: Rafina (Greece) but it can be adapted to other rivers. Binoculars (for bird Biodiversity: an analytical approach to the watching) "Megalo Rema" stream, examining the individual Sample containers organisms the ecosystem consists of (plants, Electron-fishing equipment insects, reptiles, amphibians, mollusks, birds, fish) Microscopes We emphasize on eels and their unique trip across sheets of paper (plants Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. should be pressed) Ecology: an approach that takes the ecosystem Photo-camera as a whole, examining its interrelationships with the Magnifying glass or ideally a organisms as well as strategies for its protection. pocket microscope. Equipment for animal collection Worksheets: 4 Students’ age: 16-18 Use of apps/software: No Referent: Rafina Lyceum www.daylightingrivers.com Objective of the learning unit To learn about relationships between abiotic components and the organisms various species and genus of different categories of organisms (plants, insects, birds, 2 reptiles, frogs, fishes) interrelationships with the organisms main principles of the environmental sciences; To be able to: collect organisms investigate the relationships between abiotic components and the organisms investigate the interrelationships with the organisms recognise various
    [Show full text]
  • Pressing Problems: Distribution, Threats, and Conservation Status of the Monitor Lizards (Varanidae: Varanus Spp.) of Southeast
    March 2013 Open Access Publishing Volume 8, Monograph 3 The Southeast Asia and Indo-Australian archipelago holds 60% of the varanid global diversity. The major threats to varanids in this region include habitat destruction, international commercialism, and human consumption. Pressing Problems: Distribution, Threats, and Conservation Status of the Monitor Lizards (Varanidae: Varanus spp.) of Southeast Asia and the Indo-Australian Archipelago Monograph 3. André Koch, Thomas Ziegler, Wolfgang Böhme, Evy Arida and Mark Auliya ISSN: 1931-7603 Published in Partnership with: Indexed by: Zoological Record, Scopus, Current Contents / Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences, Journal Citation Reports, Science Citation Index Extended, EMBiology, Biology Browser, Wildlife Review Abstracts, Google Scholar, and is in the Directory of Open Access Journals. PRESSING PROBLEMS: DISTRIBUTION, THREATS, AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE MONITOR LIZARDS (VARANIDAE: VARANUS SPP.) OF SOUTHEAST ASIA AND THE INDO-AUSTRALIAN ARCHIPELAGO MONOGRAPH 3. 1 2 1 3 4 ANDRÉ KOCH , THOMAS ZIEGLER , WOLFGANG BÖHME , EVY ARIDA , AND MARK AULIYA 1Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig & Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Section of Herpetology, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany, email: [email protected] 2AG Zoologischer Garten Köln, Riehler Straße 173, 50735 Köln, Germany 3Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Jl. Raya Bogor km 46, 16911 Cibinong, Indonesia 4Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Department of Conservation Biology, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany Copyright © 2013. André Koch. All Rights Reserved. Please cite this monograph as follows: Koch, André, Thomas Ziegler, Wolfgange Böhme, Evy Arida, and Mark Auliya. 2013. Pressing Problems: Distribution, threats, and conservation status of the monitor lizards (Varanidae: Varanus spp.) of Southeast Asia and the Indo-Australian Archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • Zooquaria Spring 2020
    QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND AQUARIA SPRINGZ 2020 OO QUARIAISSUE 108 A NOBLE CAUSE SAVING THE DANISH NOBLE CHAFER WHICH FISH? CAMPAIGNING DURING A GLOBAL PANDEMIC 1 BUILDING A FOOD FOREST BEHIND THE SCENES AT A NEW PRIMATE EXHIBIT Elegant enclosures with Webnet The robust wire rope net Webnet enables the realisation of the typically delicate and customized solutions. Jakob Rope Systems supplies both materials and know-how to create functional yet architecturally sophisticated animal enclosures. jakob.com Contents Zooquaria Spring 2020 12 14 4 From the Director’s chair 18 Shifting the population How Covid-19 has affected the EAZA community management paradigm Some insights into the effectiveness of the new 5 From our Chairman RCP process A message of support for EAZA Members 20 A plan for the cinereous vulture 6 Noticeboard An update on the Cinereous vulture EEP Decisions from the latest EAZA Council Meeting 22 Planning for a revolution 7 Just keep swimming How CPSG Europe is ramping up its efforts for An update on our new Which Fish? campaign species conservation 8 Births & hatchings 24 Saving the Danish noble chafer The latest success stories from EAZA zoos Reporting on a new conservation project at Copenhagen Zoo 10 Let’s help nature become part of the solution 26 Taking action for Indonesia Zooquaria talks to Luc Bas, Director of IUCN How threatened ungulates benefited from the first European Regional Office ever Action Indonesia Day 12 A bright future for songbirds 27 Flexible funding for a brighter
    [Show full text]
  • THREATENED and ENDANGERED SPECIES of NEW MEXICO 2008 Biennial Review and Recommendations
    THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF NEW MEXICO 2008 BIENNIAL REVIEW DRAFT First Public Comment Period March 11, 2008 New Mexico Department of Game and Fish Conservation Services Division DRAFT 2008 Biennial Review of T & E Species of NM, 3/11/08 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF NEW MEXICO 2008 Biennial Review and Recommendations Authority: Wildlife Conservation Act (17-2-37 through 17-2-46 NMSA 1978) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A total of 118 species and subspecies are on the 2008 list of threatened and endangered New Mexico wildlife. The list includes 2 crustaceans, 25 mollusks, 23 fishes, 6 amphibians, 15 reptiles, 32 birds and 15 mammals (Tables 1, 2). An additional 7 species of mammals has been listed as restricted to facilitate control of traffic in federally protected species. A species is endangered if it is in jeopardy of extinction or extirpation from the state; a species is threatened if it is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range in New Mexico. Species or subspecies of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, mollusks, and crustaceans native to New Mexico may be listed as threatened or endangered under the Wildlife Conservation Act (WCA). During the Biennial Review, species may be upgraded from threatened to endangered, or downgraded from endangered to threatened, based upon data, views, and information regarding the biological and ecological status of the species. Investigations for new listings or removals from the list (delistings) can be undertaken at any time, but require additional procedures from those for the Biennial Review. The 2006 Biennial Review contained a recommendation for maintaining the status for 119 species and subspecies listed as threatened, endangered, or restricted under the WCA, and uplisting four species (Arizona grasshopper sparrow, Pecos bluntnose shiner, spikedace, and meadow jumping mouse ) from threatened to endangered and downlisting two species (shortneck snaggletooth and piping plover) from endangered to threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Thinking and the Natural History Museum
    Communicating Interdependence: Ecological Thinking and the Natural History Museum Molly H. Adams A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Bachelors of Arts Degree in Critical and Visual Studies School of Liberal Arts and Sciences Pratt Institute April 1, 2012 Communicating Interdependence: Ecological Thinking and the Natural History Museum Table of Contents Foreword…………….…………………………………………………………………..3 The Importance of Ecological Interconnectedness……………………....6 The Ethical Dimensions of Ecological Thinking.………….……………13 Representations of Interconnectedness in the American Museum of Natural History’s Hall of Biodiversity………………..……….23 Communicating Interdependence at the South Fork Museum of Natural History and Nature Center..……………………….36 The Future of Ecological Thinking in the Natural History Museum and Beyond……………………………………..………......46 Notes…………………………………………………………………………………….54 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………….58 By Molly Adams Advised by Christopher Jensen and Peter Nekola 2 "This planet is an exquisitely arranged and interconnected system. What's controlled in one place is going to have consequences in another place. Our job as gardeners is to try and figure this out no matter how small our allotted space might be. Discipline has to be the watchword for our controlling hands. It means not gardening without thinking of the garden as a habitat: for mice, for squirrels, for bees and wasps. For other living creatures beyond ourselves." - Marjorie Harris The natural world, as we know it, relies on a physical and chemical equilibrium that is generated by healthy relationships amongst organisms and their habitats. We, as humans, are just one of the millions of species that depend on the stability of Earth’s ecosystems and the natural processes that take place within them.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8Th Edition
    GUIDE FOR THE CARE AND USE OF LABORATORY ANIMALS Eighth Edition Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Division on Earth and Life Studies THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern- ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer- ing, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the Committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by the Office of Extramural Research, Office of the Direc- tor, National Institutes of Health/Department of Health and Human Services under Contract Number N01-OD-4-2139 Task Order #188; the Office of Research Integrity, Department of Health and Human Services; the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International; American Association for Laboratory Animal Science; Abbott Fund; Pfizer; American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine; Ameri- can Society of Laboratory Animal Practitioners; Association of Primate Veternarians. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this pub- lication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Institutes of Health, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vivarium: Maximizing Learning with Living Invertebrates—An Out-Of-School Intervention Is More Effective Than an Equivalent Lesson at School
    insects Article The Vivarium: Maximizing Learning with Living Invertebrates—An Out-of-School Intervention Is more Effective than an Equivalent Lesson at School Peter Wüst-Ackermann 1, Christian Vollmer 2 ID , Christoph Randler 3,* ID and Heike Itzek-Greulich 2 1 Department of Biology, University of Education Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 561-2, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; [email protected] 2 Independent Researcher, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany; [email protected] (C.V.); [email protected] (H.I.-G.) 3 Department of Biology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 24, D-70726 Tübingen, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 December 2017; Accepted: 21 December 2017; Published: 2 January 2018 Abstract: The introduction of living invertebrates into the classroom was investigated. First, possible anchor points for a lesson with living invertebrates are explored by referring to the curriculum of primary/secondary schools and to out-of-school learning. The effectiveness of living animals for increasing interest, motivation, and achievement in recent research is discussed. Next, the Vivarium, an out-of-school learning facility with living invertebrates, is described. The effects of an intervention study with living invertebrates on achievement are then investigated at school (School condition) and out of school (University condition); a third group served as a control condition. The sample consisted of 1861 students (an age range of 10–12 years). Invertebrate-inspired achievement was measured as pre-, post-, and follow-up-tests. Measures of trait and state motivation were applied. The nested data structure was treated with three-level analyses. While achievement generally increased in the treatment groups as compared to the control group, there were significant differences by treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Information on Biodiversity in Belize
    COMPILATION OF INFORMATION ON BIODIVERSITY IN BELIZE November 30, 2005. Jan C. Meerman Report to Alvaro Herrera and Vilma Obando of the INBio, [email protected] and [email protected] and Wilber Sabido, Chief Forest Officer within the Forest Department of the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment. ii Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................................iii 1. State of knowledge: .....................................................................................................1 1.1. Species: .............................................................................................................1 1.1.1. Vascular Plants. ..............................................................................................2 1.1.2. Amphibia. ........................................................................................................6 1.1.3. Reptilia.............................................................................................................6 1.1.4. Birds ................................................................................................................7 1.1.5. Fishes. .............................................................................................................8 1.1.6. Mammal Species: ..........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Ex Situ
    Integration of In Situ and Ex Situ Data Management for Biodiversity Conservation Via the ISIS Zoological Information Management System A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Karin R. Schwartz Director: Thomas C. Wood, Ph.D., Associate Professor New Century College Fall Semester 2014 George Mason University Fairfax, VA ii THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION-NODERIVS 3.0 UNPORTED LICENSE. iii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my daughters Laura and Lisa Newman and my son David Newman who are the source of all my inspiration and to my parents Ruth and Eugene Schwartz who taught me the value of life-long learning and to reach for my dreams. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project encompassed a global collaboration of conservationists including zoo and wildlife professionals, academics, government authorities, IUCN Specialist Groups, and regional and global zoo associations. First, I would like to thank Dr. David Wildt for the suggestion to attend a university outside my Milwaukee home base and come to the east coast. I thank my dissertation director Dr. Tom Wood for being supportive and along with Dr. Mara Schoeny, offering lodging in their beautiful home during my stay in Virginia for the last semesters of my program. I thank Dr. Jon Ballou for his valuable input as I benefitted from his wisdom and expertise in the area of conservation action planning, population management and conservation genetics. I would like to thank my other committee members Dr. Larry Rockwood and Dr. E. Chris Parsons for their valuable input, suggestions and edits for the dissertation, especially in their respective areas of population ecology and marine mammal conservation as well as their ongoing support throughout my program.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidebook
    Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidebook 2nd Edition 2002 Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidebook 2nd Edition This Guidebook is provided for informational purposes only. It neither establishes nor reflects a change in PHS Policy on 2002 Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................... v Editorial Board ...........................................................................................vii Contributing Authors ................................................................................. viii Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) .............................................. x Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... xi Sections A. The IACUC .......................................................................................... 1 A.1. Timeline, Background and History .......................................... 3 A.2. Authority, Composition and Functions .................................. 11 A.3. Operation and Administration................................................ 19 A.4. Training for Members ............................................................. 27 A.5. Legal Concerns ..................................................................... 31 B. Oversight of the Animal Care and Use Program ....................... 35 B.1. Program and Facility Review ................................................
    [Show full text]