Michael Sedlak, Chairperson
1 p.m. Friday, September 28, 2012
SEMCOG Office Ambassador Room 535 Griswold, Suite 300 Detroit, MI
12:30 p.m. Lunch will be provided to all Executive Committee members attending.
1 p.m. Executive Committee Meeting
Action items will be presented, debated, and resolved at this session. Information items will also be presented.
Materials in this agenda are "work in progress." Some are informational reports on previous deliberations by SEMCOG advisory councils and committees or other organizations; others are recommendations by advisory councils or committees for possible policy decisions. SEMCOG policy only results from actions taken by the Executive Committee or General Assembly.
Requests for reasonable accommodations at SEMCOG meetings require advance reservations. Individuals with disabilities requiring assistance should contact SEMCOG Information Services as soon as possible.
SEMCOG documents and information are available in a variety of formats. Contact the SEMCOG Information Center [email protected] or call 313.324.3330 to discuss your format need. Parking/Directions Information
If the sign at the Griswold-Larned parking structure says that it is full or that monthly permits are required, please tell the attendant you are here to attend a SEMCOG meeting and you will be allowed to enter the structure.
Be sure to have your parking ticket validated at the SEMCOG registration desk.
View driving directions to our building.
Executive Committee Agenda Friday, September 28, 2012
A. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Approval of Agenda
B. Public Comment
C. Approval of Consent Resolution paper copies of all available at meeting 1. Receipt of Financial Statements - July 2012 (PDF) 2. Approval of Executive Committee minutes – July 26, 2012 (PDF) 3. Amendment to Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan – Memo and Resolution (PDF), Project Amendment (PDF)
D. Report from Chairperson: Michael Sedlak, Clerk, Green Oak Charter Township 4. Featured Speaker The Honorable Hansen Clarke, United States House of Representatives 5. Featured Presentation Jeffrey Guilfoyle, President, Citizens Research Council Mr. Guilfoyle will provide information and background on proposals that will appear on the November ballot. 6. Shining Light Regional Cooperation Awards Breakfast – Register to Attend
E. Report from Regional Housing Strategy Task Force Chairperson: Brenda Lawrence, Mayor, Southfield 7. Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan Action The Executive Committee is requested to approve SEMCOG’s Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan and recommend General Assembly adoption.
Memo and Resolution (PDF) paper copies available at meeting Full Report (Web link)
F. Report from Transportation Advisory Council Chairperson: Dan O’Leary, Supervisor, Charter Township of Washington 8. 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and FY 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program development: Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan Action The Executive Committee is requested to recommend General Assembly endorsement of the attached report: Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan.
Memo and Resolution (PDF) paper copies available at meeting Report (PDF) paper copies available at meeting Background (PDF) paper copies available at meeting
G. Report from Executive Director, Paul E. Tait 9. Update of Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Action The Executive Committee is requested to adopt the 2012 update of the comprehensive economic development strategy, Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan.
Memo and Resolution (PDF) paper copies available at meeting Strategy (Web link)
10. Federal Legislative Update (PDF)
H. Upcoming Events General Assembly November 8, 2012 – Royalty House, Warren
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Income Statement for one month ending- July 31, 2012
CURRENT ACTUAL % OF TOTAL MONTH YTD YTD
REVENUES: FEDERAL REVENUE 57,463 57,463 6.5% STATE ADMIN FED REVENUE 361,613 361,613 40.7% STATE REVENUE 2,169 2,169 0.2% OTHER REVENUE 10,432 10,432 1.2% OTHER ADMIN FED REVENUE 0 0 0.0% LOCAL -AVAILABLE 350,793 350,793 39.5% LOCAL -USED 105,717 105,717 11.9% MISC REVENUE 0 0 0.0% INTEREST INCOME 393 393 0.0% ------TOTAL OPERATIONAL REVENUE 888,580 888,580 100.0% ------
PASS THRU-FEDERAL 0 0 0.0% PASS THRU-STATE ADMIN FED 0 0 0.0% PASS THRU MATCH/IN-KIND REVENUE 0 0 0.0% ------TOTAL PASS THRU/IN-KIND REVENUE 0 0 ------TOTAL REVENUE 888,580 888,580 100.0% ------
EXPENDITURES:
SALARIES 266,395 266,395 49.6% CONTRACTS 5,006 5,006 0.9% TRAVEL 9,994 9,994 1.9% SUPPLIES 12,909 12,909 2.4% OTHER EXPENSES 89,514 89,514 16.7% MEETING EXPENSES 44 44 0.0% MEETING REVENUE 0 0 0.0% EXPEND OFFSET 0 0 0.0% FRINGE BENEFITS 153,531 153,531 28.6% ------TOTAL OPERATIONAL EXPENSES 537,394 537,394 ------PASS THRU EXPENSES 0 0 0.0% PASS THRU/IN-KIND MATCH 0 0 0.0% ------TOTAL PTM/IN-KIND EXPENSES 0 0 ------TOTAL EXPENSES 537,394 537,394 100.0% ------
REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENSES 351,186 351,186 ======pg1 Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Year-to-date Actual to Budget Comparison One month ending July 31, 2012
% OF LINE YTD ACTUAL ANNUAL BUDGET ITEM BUDGET
REVENUES: FEDERAL REVENUE 57,463 1,669,498 3.4% STATE ADMIN FED REVENUE 361,613 5,567,359 6.5% STATE REVENUE 2,169 126,741 0.0% OTHER REVENUES 10,432 218,489 4.8% OTHER ADMIN FED REVENUE 0 0 0.0% LOCAL -AVAILABLE 350,793 1,923,077 18.2% LOCAL -USED 105,717 0 0.0% MISC REVENUE 0 0 0.0% INTEREST INCOME 393 10,000 3.9% TRANSFER IN FROM STABILIZATION FUND 0 0 0.0% ------TOTAL OPERATIONAL REVENUE 888,580 9,515,164 9.3% ------
PASS THRU-FEDERAL 0 0 0.0% PASS THRU-STATE ADMIN FED 0 1,320,816 0.0% PASS THRU MATCH/IN-KIND REVENUE 0 422,010 0.0% ------TOTAL PASS THRU/IN-KIND REVENUE 0 1,742,826 ------
TOTAL REVENUE 888,580 11,257,990 7.9% ------
EXPENDITURES:
SALARIES 266,395 3,966,819 6.7% CONTRACTS 5,006 1,214,951 0.4% TRAVEL 9,994 272,500 3.7% SUPPLIES 12,909 291,950 4.4% OTHER EXPENSES 89,514 1,476,410 6.1% MEETING EXPENSES 44 0 0.0% MEETING REVENUE 0 0 0.0% EXPEND OFFSET 0 0 0.0% FRINGE BENEFITS 153,531 2,016,201 7.6% REDUCTION IN STAFF COST/AR CONTIGENCY 0 276,333 0.0% ------TOTAL OPERATIONAL EXPENSES 537,394 9,515,164 5.6% ------PASS THRU EXPENSES 0 1,320,816 0.0% PASS THRU/IN KIND MATCH 0 422,010 0.0% ------TOTAL PTM/IN-KIND EXPENSES 0 1,742,826 0.0% ------TOTAL EXPENSES 537,394 11,257,990 4.8% ------
REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENSES 351,186 0 ======
8% COMPLETE pg2
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes July 26, 2012
A. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Approval of Agenda
Chairperson Michael Sedlak called the Executive Committee meeting to order at 1 p.m.
Deputy Executive Director Kathleen Lomako called the roll. A quorum was present.
Monroe County Administrator Royce Maniko made the motion to approve the agenda. The motion carried.
B. Public Comment
Chairperson Michael Sedlak offered members of the public three minutes to comment on any agenda item. No comments were made.
C. Approval of Consent Resolution
Macomb County ISD Vice President Max McCullough made the motion to approve the items in the consent resolution: Receipt of Financial Statements – May 2012; Approval of Executive Committee minutes – May 2012; Nonmotorized Data Collection Contract; and the Federal Transit Administration Authorizing Resolution. The motion carried.
D. Report from Chairperson: Michael Sedlak, Clerk, Green Oak Charter Township
Michael Sedlak introduced SMART’s Director of Finance John Foster and Deputy General Manager of Administration John Swatosh to provide background on the proposed operating budget and five-year capital budget.
Southgate Mayor Joseph Kuspa and Kevin Johnson from SEMCOG Plan and Policy Development presented background on the work of the Redeveloping Commercial and Industrial Corridors Task Force. Mayor Kuspa made the motion to approve the task force recommendation to select Gratiot Avenue as a pilot corridor in which to test tools from the Redeveloping Commercial and Industrial Corridors Toolkit.
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes July 26, 2012 P a g e | 2
Executive Committee Resolution Approve Selection of Gratiot Avenue as Redeveloping Commercial and Industrial Corridors Pilot Corridor
WHEREAS, Gratiot Avenue is a regionally significant transportation corridor that advances economic opportunities and social well-being;
WHEREAS, Gratiot Avenue provides an opportunity to test an array of tools in a variety of different settings;
WHEREAS, Gratiot Avenue offers redevelopment potential as well as an opportunity to leverage other work and add significant value to the redevelopment process;
WHEREAS, Gratiot Avenue is identified in transit plans as a corridor for expanded transit services; and
WHEREAS, Gratiot Avenue presents an opportunity for multi-community and multi- stakeholder involvement;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, this 26th day of July 2012 THAT the Executive Committee of SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, approves selection of Gratiot Avenue as a pilot corridor in which to test tools from the Redeveloping Commercial and Industrial Corridors Toolkit. The motion carried.
Chairperson Sedlak informed the Committee of the 2012-2013 Legislative Policy Platform Task Force that is forming and of the Member Focus group that recently met.
Chairperson Sedlak introduced Andy Pickard and Marisol Simon from the Federal Highway Administration to present the 2012 Southeast Michigan Transportation Planning Certification Report covering the SEMCOG Metropolitan Planning Area.
E. Report from Transportation Advisory Council Chairperson: Dan O’Leary, Supervisor, Charter Township
Washington Township Supervisor Dan O’Leary presented the Amendment to the FY 2011- 2014 Transportation Improvement Program for Southeast Michigan. Supervisor O’Leary made the motion to approve the amendment.
Executive Committee Resolution Approving an Amendment to the FY 2011-2014 Transportation Improvement Program for Southeast Michigan
WHEREAS, SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, is the designated policy committee and Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Southeast Michigan Study Area;
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes July 26, 2012 P a g e | 3
WHEREAS, SEMCOG is responsible for the development of a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which is required by both the Federal Transit Administration and the Federal Highway Administration;
WHEREAS, SEMCOG is required to develop amendments to the FY 2011-2014 TIP pursuant to Section 134 of Title 23, United States Code;
WHEREAS, SEMCOG’s amendments to the FY 2011-2014 TIP include a fiscal analysis that identifies sources of anticipated revenue and how identified projects will be funded, and thus, are financially constrained;
WHEREAS, the FY 2011-2014 TIP was analyzed in accordance with 40 CFR 51 for air quality conformity and found not to exceed present and future emission budgets in all analysis years;
WHEREAS, the amendment to the FY 2011-2014 TIP is consistent with Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan, constrained to reasonable revenues, and was made available for public review and comment;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, this 26th day of July 2012 THAT the Executive Committee of SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, approves the addition of 137 projects to and the deletion of nine projects from the FY 2011-2014 Transportation Improvement Program;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT SEMCOG has determined that the amendment to the FY 2011-2014 Transportation Improvement Program conforms to the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality as required by provisions of 40 CFR 51 and 23 CFR 450. The motion carried.
Washington Township Supervisor Dan O’Leary and Trevor Brydon from SEMCOG Plan and Policy Development presented the SEMCOG Freight and Economic Analysis Report.
F. Report from Manufactured Housing Task Force Chairperson: Jeff Yaroch, Councilor, City of Richmond
Richmond Councilor Jeff Yaroch provided an update of Manufactured Housing Task Force activities.
G. Report from Executive Director, Paul E. Tait
SEMCOG Executive Director Paul Tait presented background on the Detroit Institute of Arts proposal that will appear on the August 7, 2012 ballot. Huntington Woods Commissioner Jeffrey Jenks made the motion to approve the resolution of support.
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes July 26, 2012 P a g e | 4
Resolved, this 26th day of July THAT the Executive Committee of SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, support passage of a 10-year 0.2 mill regional tax to support the Detroit Institute of Arts (DIA).The motion carried.
Mr. Tait introduced SEMCOG Plan Implementation Manager Carmine Palombo to provide background on MAP-21, the new federal transportation bill. Tait also reported on the Ozone Action season, the new SEMCOG office space, and other legislative issues.
H. Upcoming Events
Chairperson Sedlak reminded the Committee that the August Executive Committee meeting is cancelled. The next Executive Committee meeting is September 28, 2012.
There being no further business, the Executive Committee was adjourned at 2:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen Wieber Legislative and Planning Analyst Executive Committee Meeting Minutes July 26, 2012 P a g e | 5
Executive Committee Meeting Attendance July 26, 2012
Bloc Seats Present Representing Steven Williams Livingston County Steven Manor Livingston County Cities and Villages Michael Sedlak Livingston County Townships Kathy Vosburg Macomb County Jeff Yaroch Macomb County Cities and Villages Dan O’Leary Macomb County Townships Royce R. Maniko Monroe County Robert Clark Monroe County Cities and Villages Jim Nash Oakland County John A. Scott Oakland County David VanderVeen Oakland County Jeffrey Jenks Oakland County Cities and Villages Cary Junior Oakland County Townships Marsden Murphy St. Clair County Pauline Repp St. Clair County Cities and Villages Yousef Rabhi Washtenaw County Lois Richardson Washtenaw Cities and Villages Joe Zurawski Washtenaw County Townships Milton Mack, Jr. Wayne County Martha Scott Wayne County David Angileri Wayne County Cities and Villages Phil LaJoy Wayne County Townships Alan Anderson Community College Mary E. Blackmon Intermediate School Districts Max D. McCullough Intermediate School Districts
Bloc Seats Absent Livingston County [1] Oakland County Townships [0] Livingston County City and Villages [0] St. Clair County [1] Livingston County Townships [0] St. Clair County Cities and Villages [0] Macomb County [3] St. Clair County Townships [1] Macomb County Cities and Villages [1] Washtenaw County [1] Macomb County Townships [0] Washtenaw County Cities and Villages [0] Monroe County [1] Washtenaw County Townships [0] Monroe County Cities and Villages [0] Wayne County [4] Monroe County Townships [1] Wayne County Cities and Villages [1] Oakland County [3] Wayne County Townships [0] Oakland County Cities and Villages [1] City of Detroit [3]
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes July 26, 2012 P a g e | 6
Ex-Officio Members Delegates At-Large Tina Abbate Marzolf Area Agency on Aging 1-B
Transportation Providers Julie Edwards Michigan Department of Transportation Denise Jackson Michigan Department of Transportation David Evancoe Road Commission for Oakland County Douglas Fuller Washtenaw County Road Commission
Guests Russell L. Jorgenson Federal Highway Adminsitration Joseph Kuspa City of Southgate Steward McKenzie Federal Transit Administration Andy Pickard Federal Highway Administration Marisol Simon Federal Transit Administration John Swatosh Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation
SEMCOG Staff Paul E. Tait Executive Director Kathleen Lomako Deputy Executive Director Tom Bruff Plan and Policy Development Trevor Brydon Plan and Policy Development Jody Egelton Internal Support Scott Failla Internal Support Nick Friedrich Internal Support Chuck Hersey Plan and Policy Development Naheed Huq Plan Implementation Kevin Johnson Plan and Policy Development Susan Krichbaum Metropolitan Affairs Coalition Amy Malmer Membership/External Affairs Amy Mangus Plan Implementation Robert Morris Membership/External Affairs Carmine Palombo Plan Implementation Jacque’l Smith Internal Support Mike Spence Membership/External Affairs Iris Steinberg Membership/External Affairs Sue Stetler Membership/External Affairs Karen Wieber Membership/External Affairs Transportation Advisory Council Dan O’Leary, Chairperson Supervisor, Charter Township of Washington
September 28, 2012
TO: Executive Committee
SUBJECT: Amendment to Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan
Summary of action requested The Executive Committee is requested to approve General Assembly adoption of the amendment of Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan.
Policy implications Direction2035 was originally adopted in October 2009 and represents the vision of the region’s transportation system through the year 2035. The proposed amendment is needed to include projects not fully developed at the time Direction2035 was originally adopted or modify existing projects, to take advantage of new funding, and to reflect changing priorities. Amending Direction2035 allows projects to be programmed into the Transportation Improvement Program, making them eligible for federal and state funding.
Background One project amendment and an associated funding transfer are proposed by the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). MDOT proposes adding a new project to reconfigure the I-96/US-23 interchange in Livingston County. The proposal includes constructing six new through-lanes on I-96 between the current eastbound and westbound lanes of the highway, along with building three new bridges over northbound and southbound US-23, and over Old US-23. The existing lanes of I-96 will become collector/distributor lanes as a way to help ramp traffic move smoothly through the interchange. The existing six bridges over US-23 and Old US-23 would also be rebuilt. Funding for the project will be transferred from an existing road rehabilitation line item to maintain fiscal constraint.
In addition, administrative changes are provided for information only.
The amendment process requires all proposed projects undergo the same evaluation as original Direction2035 projects. The fiscal constraint analysis indicates Direction2035 remains fiscally constrained. The air quality conformity analyses indicate future year emissions of ozone precursors and carbon monoxide will remain below established mobile source emissions budgets, and future year fine particulate matter emissions will be below base year levels. The environmental sensitivity review summarizes possible impacts of Direction2035 projects on environmentally sensitive resources. Amendment to Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan
The environmental justice analysis indicates impacts related to implementation of the Direction2035 remain balanced across the region.
The public comment period for the amendment officially began on September 4, 2012 and will end with General Assembly action on November 8, 2012.
Action by other committees The Transportation Advisory Council reviewed the amendment on September 26, 2012. The committee’s recommendation will be presented at the Executive Committee meeting prior to action.
Action requested The Executive Committee is requested to approve General Assembly adoption of the attached resolution to amend Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan.
General Assembly Resolution to Amend Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan
WHEREAS, SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, is responsible for developing a long-range regional transportation plan;
WHEREAS, Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan was developed pursuant to 23 USC 134 and 49 USC 5303, and adopted by SEMCOG’s general Assembly on October 22, 2009;
WHEREAS, Direction2035 promotes accessibility and mobility for all people and freight while maintaining community integrity, strategically improves the transportation infrastructure to enhance community and economic vitality, promotes a safe and secure transportation system, and protects the environment, both natural and built;
WHEREAS, Direction2035 contains policies, initiatives, and projects aimed at maximizing regional goals and objectives and achieving regional performance targets as established in the adopted regional investment direction;
WHEREAS, Direction2035 requires periodic updates to include projects not fully developed at the time Direction2035 was originally adopted, to take advantage of new funding, and to reflect changing priorities;
WHEREAS, projects were proposed for amendment to Direction2035 and evaluated with respect to goals and objectives, performance targets, federal planning factors, environmental justice, environmental sensitivity, air quality conformity, and transportation financing;
Amendment to Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan
WHEREAS, the Direction2035 amendment was open to public and agency review and comment;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, this 8th day of November 2012 THAT the General Assembly of SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, adopts the amendment of projects to Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Direction2035, as amended, remains consistent with regional goals and objectives and performance targets;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Direction2035, as amended, remains consistent with federal planning factors;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT impacts resulting from Direction2035, as amended, are balanced across the region, so that no one population bears a disproportionate negative impact, and the benefits are shared across the region;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT potential impacts from Direction2035, as amended, on environmentally sensitive resources have been examined;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Direction2035, as amended, remains within established mobile source emissions budgets for ozone precursors and carbon monoxide and below the base year level for fine particulate matter;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Direction2035, as amended, is constrained to identified funding resources;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Direction2035, as amended, conforms to the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality as required by the provisions of 40 CFR 51 and 23 CFR 450;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the General Assembly of SEMCOG submits this amendment to Direction2035 to the Michigan Department of Transportation, as designee for the Governor’s Office of the State of Michigan, for review and transmittal to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
ATTEST: DATE: Committee Clerk
RTP County Project Name Project Limits Proposed Work Length Urban Jurisdiction Time Code Model Costs Comments ID (Miles) Area Network (in $1,000s) amendment - added new project and 6681 Livingston I-96 at US-23 Reconfigure interchange B MDOT 2014 2020 50479 transferred funds from ID 4851 amendment - transferred funds to ID 4851 Regional Various trunkline roads Regionwide Rehabilitate roadway D MDOT 2014 273324 6681
Urban Area: B - Brighton/Howell/South Lyon; D - Detroit Jurisdiction: MDOT - Michigan Department of Transportation
Amendments - 1 of 1 Regional Housing Strategy Task Force Brenda Lawrence, Chairperson Mayor, City of Southfield
September 28, 2012
TO: Executive Committee
SUBJECT: Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan
Summary of action requested The Executive Committee is requested to approve SEMCOG’s Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan and recommend General Assembly adoption.
Policy implications This strategy focuses specifically on policy and local action recommendations that respond to the region’s housing needs and opportunities. These policies and actions will be incorporated into a number of SEMCOG planning efforts, such as the 2013-2014 Legislative Policy Platform, the regional transportation plan, the Redeveloping Commercial and Industrial Corridor Toolkit, and the Sustainable Community Recognition Program. Additionally, the local and regional action recommendations are specifically designed to be interwoven with numerous SEMCOG technical assistance and assessment services, as well as educational outreach and advocacy initiatives.
Background Five broad categories of housing findings were identified and were the focus of policy recommendations: There are Systemic Regional Issues that must be addressed at the regional level to create a strong housing market and resilient neighborhoods; Neighborhoods are the backbone of our communities and their health is a main indicator of economic stability in the region; The condition, quality, and availability of our Housing Stock have been impacted by the region’s changing economy and demographics – primarily declines in population and household wealth; Maintaining and promoting Fair Housing and neighborhoods that are diverse and equitable is vital for a sustainable and thriving region; and The Affordability and Accessibility of the region’s housing must be preserved and encouraged.
To address these findings, 14 state and federal policy recommendations and 24 local and regional action recommendations were developed by the task force: Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan
State and Federal Policy recommendations 1. Promote dependable and consistent federal support and funding that addresses the core housing challenges of the region – demolition, deconstruction, and removal of substandard housing 2. Develop programs and increase funding for housing rehabilitation and weatherization 3. Support continued federal initiatives for foreclosure prevention 4. Encourage support and funding for housing counseling 5. Support federal fair housing policy that encourages equal access to housing opportunities for all persons 6. Promote policy changes to improve appraisal process and oversight 7. Financially incentivize housing development in mature areas – especially infill development near or along transit corridors and locations near employment centers and services 8. Improve public transit throughout Southeast Michigan to link housing to jobs and services 9. Support essential programs that address the region’s senior housing needs, specifically the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program 10. Support programs that combat and prevent homelessness in the region 11. Expand financing tools and market incentives in neighborhoods destabilized by high numbers of foreclosures, vacancies, and diminished private market investment 12. Provide adequate funding and promote policies that enable Public Housing Authorities (including subsidized and low-income rental housing) to appropriately invest in the upkeep and maintenance of their properties 13. Continue funding and increase flexibility of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program 14. Provide adequate support for administrative costs of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program and renew all authorized vouchers
Local and Regional Action recommendations 15. Strategic and targeted demolition, deconstruction, and green reuse strategies to stabilize neighborhoods 16. Strategic construction, residential rehabilitation, and infill development in market- demand and infrastructure supported areas 17. Encourage communities for a lifetime through regional and local policies which provide housing choices that enable people to remain in the community as they age 18. Enable strategic construction and adaptive reuse of housing to meet the needs of elderly households 19. Utilize, where applicable, land banking tools and strategies that enable communities to gain control, clear title, hold, manage, and convey vacant, abandoned and foreclosed properties to productive reuse Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan
20. Proactive promotion of foreclosure information and housing counseling opportunities to homeowners and renters 21. Implement property maintenance and improvement initiatives 22. Utilize targeted code enforcement and property maintenance policies 23. Implement a Vacant Property Registration Ordinance that allows communities to inspect, monitor and require owners to register vacant properties as soon as they become vacant 24. Implement a Rental Housing Policy (includes Rental Registration, Inspection, and Certification ordinance/regulation) to ensure a minimum standard of housing quality 25. Develop a comprehensive Housing Asset Management Strategy 26. Build partnerships with residents, business owners, elected officials, and other stakeholders to preserve clean, safe, and healthy neighborhoods 27. Implement proactive actions in obtaining accurate and credible appraisals 28. Expand and enhance landlord education programs and outreach 29. Encourage needed housing types through local land use, building, and zoning regulations 30. Encourage public/private partnerships in redevelopment of local housing markets 31. Provide citizens, homeowners, landlords, and others with information on housing choices, housing values, housing costs – including housing, transportation, and energy costs 32. Improve and make more uniform fair housing information on community Web sites 33. Educate and inform local officials, general public, and landlords of fair housing laws and best practices 34. Increase local and regional education campaigns on the community benefits of providing affordable and inclusive housing options 35. Establish, where applicable, a Human Relations Commission whose focus is on fostering mutual self-respect and understanding and promoting amicable relations among all racial, religious, and ethnic groups 36. Encourage higher density, Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and LEED-ND Smart Location and Linkage rating system to increase housing development in areas that already have existing infrastructure 37. Prioritize incentives for rental preservation and affordable housing in areas that are transit accessible, and near employment opportunities and services 38. Expand and enhance residential energy efficiency education and access to incentives
Action by other committees The Housing Strategy Task Force contributed a broad spectrum of knowledge and expertise in guiding creation of the Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan. The 39 members of the task force represent housing advocacy organizations; local, county, state, and federal government agencies; housing development professionals; research, policy, and educational institutions; and transit providers. The task force unanimously recommended Executive Committee approval of the strategy. Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan
Action requested The Executive Committee is requested to approve General Assembly adoption of the attached resolution.
General Assembly Resolution to Adopt the Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan
WHEREAS, the Regional Housing Strategy Task Force, made up of 39 members representing housing advocacy organizations, local, county, state, and federal government agencies; housing development professionals; research, policy, and educational instructions; and transit providers unanimously approved the Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan;
WHEREAS, five broad categories of housing findings were assessed through local and regional data analysis and the expertise of task force members as well as housing and community development professionals;
WHEREAS, 14 state and federal policy recommendations and 24 local and regional action recommendations are proposed to address the region’s housing findings;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, this 8th day of November 2012 THAT the General Assembly of SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, adopts the Regional Housing Needs and Neighborhood Resiliency Strategy for Southeast Michigan;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the strategy be released for public comment;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the regional housing findings be integrated and incorporated into the regional transportation plan and other regional planning efforts;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the state and federal policy recommendations be forwarded to the Legislative Policy Platform Task Force for consideration in SEMCOG’s 2013- 2014 Legislative Policy Platform; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the local and regional policy action recommendations be encouraged and advocated through SEMCOG technical assistance services, educational training workshops, and in coordination with other local and regional planning efforts.
ATTEST: DATE: Committee Clerk
Transportation Advisory Council Dan O’Leary, Chairperson Supervisor, Charter Township of Washington
September 28, 2012
TO: Executive Committee
SUBJECT: Developing the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) for Southeast Michigan and FY 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Summary of action requested The Executive Committee is requested to recommend General Assembly endorsement of the attached report: Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan.
Policy implications Our transportation network – roads, bridges, transit systems, rail, airports, water ports, and recreational trails and pathways – is critical to the well-being of individual communities and the entire seven-county region. Developing the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan and FY 2014- 2017 Transportation Improvement Program, which will direct approximately $34 billion of investment in Southeast Michigan’s transportation network, are key responsibilities of SEMCOG.
Background The region’s transportation assets are key drivers of our economy and can be major contributors to the desirable communities that attract and retain a talented workforce. Providing a variety of travel choices gives people who have differing transportation needs access to jobs, health care, shopping, recreational opportunities, and the everyday necessities of life. Our transportation system supports and attracts private sector investment by linking businesses with customers, markets, supply chains/distribution networks, and employees.
An overarching consideration in developing the 2040 Transportation Plan is that it reflects SEMCOG’s Creating Success outcomes and performance measures. It will emphasize effectively using our finite resources to meet the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors in a manner that fits with the realities of the 21st Century and contributes to: Economic Prosperity Desirable Communities Fiscally Sustainable Public Services Reliable, Quality Infrastructure Healthy, Attractive Environmental Assets Access to Services, Jobs, Markets, and Amenities
Developing the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan and FY 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program
Continued development of the Regional Transportation Plan recognizes the key findings summarizing conditions in the region and reflects principles to guide this work that were adopted by the Executive Committee in May 2012. Today, we are presenting the next phase of plan development, Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan, that includes information on: Changing Paradigms in Southeast Michigan Transportation System Needs Analysis Financial Forecast Investment Prioritization Transportation Alternative Program Preliminary Policies Outreach and Engagement
This ongoing sharing of information and proposals is intended to facilitate productive engagement of members, stakeholders, and the public in developing the RTP. It also establishes a framework for submitting projects for the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
Action by other committees The information in this document was presented to the Transportation Advisory Council on September 26, 2012 for concurrence. Their action will be reported to the Executive Committee.
Executive Committee Resolution to recommend endorsement of Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan a report providing direction in developing the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
WHEREAS, SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, is responsible for developing a long-range regional transportation plan and short-range transportation improvement program designed to maximize the return on federal and state transportation dollars in ways that best meet local and regional needs;
WHEREAS, the regional transportation plan and transportation improvement program are key elements of Creating Success in Southeast Michigan;
WHEREAS, the Executive Committee of SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, in May of 2012 adopted key findings and guiding principles as the foundation for transportation decision-making in the region;
Whereas SEMCOG has continued to develop and analyze extensive data as a part of the development of the 2040 RTP/TIP;
Developing the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan and FY 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program
WHEREAS, SEMCOG has reviewed and analyzed the recently enacted federal transportation legislation, MAP-21, to ensure that the plan approach is consistent with federal law;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, this 28th day of September 2012 THAT the Executive Committee of SEMCOG, endorses Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan, that provides staff direction in developing the RTP/TIP. The report: Identifies the needs analysis, Identifies financial constraints, Identifies investment priorities, Includes preliminary polices, Provides a basis for soliciting projects from operating agencies, and Establishes procedures for soliciting and selecting projects under the Transportation Alternatives program enacted in MAP-21.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Executive Committee recommends General Assembly endorsement of Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Executive Committee directs SEMCOG to continue to solicit member, stakeholder, and public input as a part of RTP/TIP development.
ATTEST: DATE: Committee Clerk
Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan September 2012
Our region’s transportation network – our roads, bridges, transit systems, rail, airports, water ports, and recreational trails and pathways – is critical to Creating Success in Southeast Michigan. Therefore, one of the overarching considerations in developing the region’s 2040 Regional Transportation Plan is how it addresses our Creating Success outcomes and performance measures. It will emphasize effectively using our finite resources to meet the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors in a manner that fits with the realities of the 21st Century and contributes to: Economic Prosperity Desirable Communities Fiscally Sustainable Public Services Reliable, Quality Infrastructure Healthy, Attractive Environmental Assets Access to Services, Jobs, Markets, and Amenities
Another important consideration for the plan is consistency with the national goals set forth in the new federal transportation program, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP- 21). Broadly speaking, the goals include: Safety, Infrastructure Condition, Congestion Reduction, System Reliability, Freight Movement and Economic Vitality, Environmental Sustainability, and Reduced Project Delivery Delays.
The third important consideration is the set of Principles for Guiding Development of Southeast Michigan’s 2040 Regional Transportation Plan that were adopted by the Executive Committee in May 2012. These principles were adopted to help guide staff analysis, advisory committee discussion, and public outreach activities, all of which contribute to plan development.
These considerations are reflected in the following information, created as part of SEMCOG’s continued development of the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and FY 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program. This includes information on: Changing Paradigms in Southeast Michigan Transportation System Needs Analysis Forecast of Available Revenue Investment Prioritization The new Transportation Alternatives Program Preliminary Policies Outreach and Engagement
Building On Our Transportation Assets
Changing Paradigms
Much has changed in the region, the state, and the country in recent years. Examples of these changes are reflected in the following table comparing the “Old” with the “New Paradigm” . . . a New Paradigm that will help guide development of the next transportation plan.
Old Paradigm New Paradigm Success is defined by growth in population Little growth expected over next 30 years. and job Success is defined by quality of life. Region competes with rest of country Region competes with rest of world Parts of region can be successful For parts to succeed, the whole must succeed High school education is sufficient Advanced education is essential Choose a job and then a place to live Choose a place to live and then a job Connectivity defined by auto access Connectivity defined by access to many different things including: o Technology and communications (computers, mobile devices) o Alternative modes of transportation, such as biking and public transit o International economic markets Build costly roads to meet peak travel demand Reduce costs by reducing peak travel and better use of existing road capacity Taxing gas consumption will fund Gas tax revenues are declining due to emphasis transportation needs on conservation and higher fuel economy/ electric vehicles Work in office Work remotely – from home or other locations Work traditional schedule More flexible work hours Transit only benefits those who use it Transit attracts people and jobs Federal government will solve our problems We must create our own destiny More money will solve our problems We must reduce our costs as we also seek additional, more sustainable revenue Property taxes will provide adequate funding Real property taxable value in Southeast for public services Michigan has dropped 30% since it peaked in 2008 and, under current tax law, will not increase in inflation-adjusted dollars even when the housing market rebounds. Develop a transportation plan as stand-alone Develop a transportation plan consistent with document other infrastructure services to achieve desired regional outcomes Freight facilities widely dispersed across the Greater concentration of freight facilities in country fewer locations Biking facilities are purely recreational Biking facilities are an essential part of our transportation infrastructure.
Building On Our Transportation Assets
Needs Analysis
One of the main considerations in establishing priorities for the long-range plan is an assessment of needs. Following is a brief summary of our analysis to-date on system performance, that considers: Pavement condition Bridges Freight Transit Road congestion/capacity Safety Nonmotorized travel
Pavement condition: Quality pavement facilitates efficient movement of people and goods and contributes to our success in the global competition for jobs.
Each year, about half of the roads in the region are assessed to determine the condition of pavement. Unfortunately, we are faced with a twofold problem. Despite the efforts of many road agencies, pavement continues to deteriorate. The result is that the cost of returning our pavement to good condition has more than doubled over the last few years. If the current rate of deterioration continues, the cost of the fix will continue to escalate. The pressure will be on to devote as many resources as possible to pavement management at the expense of other strategic actions that would benefit the region. Therefore, increased use of asset management to project decision making and scheduling is more critical than ever and needs to be emphasized in the plan.
Bridges: Quality bridges link places and, by doing so, play a critical role in providing access to jobs, amenities, and services in the region. Thus, they are a link to our economic prosperity. Bridges also play a key role in freight movement, which is another vital link to our economic prosperity. In particular, our international crossings are key to our ability to take advantage of our freight-network assets in expanding global trade. The international crossing is vital to taking advantage of our freight assets so we can capitalize on opportunities resulting from the ever- expanding trading of goods.
A quality bridge network must be in place to effectively and efficiently support these activities. It is also necessary to maintain and improve safety. Otherwise, connectivity is broken, access is compromised, and the cost of residential travel and business operations increases.
In contrast to pavement condition, 77 percent of our bridges continue to be in fair or good condition.
Freight: One of our guiding principles is that we build on our assets. Accessing global markets gives us the opportunity to increase our economic prosperity. Building On Our Transportation Assets
Southeast Michigan has a world-class freight transportation network of roads, rail, airports, marine terminals, and border crossings. It serves as the supply chain hub of the North American auto industry and the premier gateway to Canada, the United States’ top trading partner.
Southeast Michigan is in a unique position amongst large U.S. metropolitan areas. It has direct international access. It also has available capacity with less congestion than many other regions. The freight system, combined with a long history of manufacturing and trade expertise, are valuable economic development assets that enable growth of Michigan firms as well as attraction of new business.
That said, the regional freight system faces challenges. There are critical links in the system where regional trade and commerce are dependent on infrastructure that is outdated, inefficient, or where there is no redundancy in the system. Plans to address these critical link deficiencies have led to project proposals for a new bridge and rail tunnel connecting Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, improvements to the urban rail and terminal network in Detroit, and a new customs plaza for the Blue Water Bridge in Port Huron. Other examples include reconstruction of I-94 in the City of Detroit and I-75 in Oakland County. These projects contribute heavily to our access to markets and our overall economic prosperity.
Trucking is the primary mode for moving goods, so the quality of the freight system is closely tied to the quality of interstates and highways that are also used for passenger travel. Declining pavement condition causes untimely wear on trucking equipment and is a contributing factor to congestion and traffic crashes which create delays that are costly to society. Investments that keep roadways in good condition, improve safety, and mitigate congestion also extend the life and increase the value of the freight system. These investments will enable us to expand and take advantage of economic globalization.
Transit: A key measure of success for Southeast Michigan’s transit system is ridership. Improving transit helps us all because it allows many who cannot afford an automobile to get to jobs. And, it helps us attract and retain the increasingly mobile knowledge-based workforce that supports growth in per capita income.
Over the last four years, overall ridership in the region has been steady to slightly increasing. This has happened despite service cutbacks instituted in reponse to decreased operating funds.
While this is the case overall, some individual routes have experienced significant growth due to service consolidation. This forced transit operators to eliminate some routes and focus resources on their primary routes. Unfortunately, the result is less transit access for those relying on routes where service has been reduced or eliminated.
An intensive survey of transit users confirms that most current riders are transit dependant. So, reductions in service hamper our ability to improve the labor utilization rate because users cannot get to jobs. Nor do they have access to essential services such as shopping and hospitals.
Building On Our Transportation Assets
Creating Success emphasizes the need for transit ridership to be comparable to other areas with whom we compete for residents and jobs. Currently, Southeast Michigan transit ridership ranks 22nd out of the 25 largest metropolitan areas in the country.
To address this deficiency, the top needs for the region’s transit system continue to be a dedicated source of local funding for transit, along with formation of a regional transit authority. Then, we can improve coordination of existing service between providers and leverage funds to improve the quality and expand the availability of service, including realizing plans for rapid transit.
Congestion/Capacity: With the growing use of technology, many people’s job opportunities, as well as their access to goods and services, are no longer as dependant on the automobile. This presents new opportunities for relieving congestion and improving use of our existing transportation system.
The regional plan for transportation as it relates to congestion and capacity will be based on the following conclusions from our analysis of data and use of modeling tools. Most congestion in the region occurs during peak hours of travel. This is a target of opportunity because it allows us to focus on actions only necessary during rush hour. Levels of congestion in Southeast Michigan are lower than most other heavily urbanized areas. While this is of little consolation to those dealing with congestion on a daily basis, it is an important consideration when deciding where to spend limited resources. Conversely, many roads in the region are operating well below maximum road capacity. Some of these roads are either parallel or in close proximity to congested roads. This presents another opportunity to address some of the congestion through low-cost operational fixes including using roads with excess capacity as alternative routes. Technological innovations are making real-time management of traffic less costly and more readily available. Some projected needs might be reduced as we take advantage of these innovations. While opportunities exist to address congestion through demand management strategies and technological innovation, some investment in capacity expansion, especially strategic investments that may facilitate movement of freight and on-time delivery of products and parts, may also be needed.
Safety: Safety contributes to desirable communities and to the attraction of businesses and the jobs they create.
As a result of our investments in safety, we have already realized safety levels anticipated in 2035.
An ongoing policy issue will be reconciling the high priority most place on continuing to emphasize improving safety, while at the same time resources to maintain all the system’s needs are inadequate.
Building On Our Transportation Assets
Also, we need to recognize that many projects not funded under the banner of “safety” also provide many safety benefits, bridge improvements for example.
Bicycle and Pedestrian (non-motorized) Travel: Bicycle and pedestrian paths contribute to desirable communities and healthy lifestyles. They may connect with transit routes and help create centers of community activity.
There is increasing recognition of the value of “non-motorized” travel; at least 35 SEMCOG communities have adopted non-motorized plans and/or policies that promote them as part of complete streets concepts. Communities may consider various pathway options depending on the purpose and geographic area served by the path, as well as cost and other factors. These include separate pathways as well as using existing roadway capacity for on-road facilities such as bike lanes. SEMCOG and MDOT are currently developing a regional non-motorized plan that will help better assess the non-motorized system’s performance. This analysis will be included in the RTP and SEMCOG’s Green Infrastructure Vision.
Forecast of Available Revenue
Federal law and fiscal prudence requires that the combined cost of all projects not exceed forecasted revenues. This applies to both highway and transit projects.
The methodology for forecasting available revenue is standardized across the state. It was developed cooperatively by representatives of metropolitan planning organizations (such as SEMCOG), transit agencies, the Michigan Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, and the Federal Transit Administration.
Using this agreed-upon forecast methodology, we project that the transportation funding situation in Southeast Michigan will continue to worsen. Inflation is eroding the purchasing power of available revenues. The significant negative impact that new fuel economy standards will have on both state and federal gas-tax revenue must be addressed.
The forecast of available transportation funding in our region is currently estimated at $34 billion through 2040. This is similar to levels in the current plan. This is a preliminary estimate. Substantial changes have been made to federal transportation funding with the passage of MAP- 21, and the exact impact of these changes is still being analyzed. The forecast will be updated as more details become available.
Investment Prioritization
The 2035 RTP included guidance for allocating limited funding to the following categories: bridges, walking and biking, transit, pavement, congestion management, and safety. Allocating targets for each of these categories was based on an assessment of the varying degrees of benefits expected from varying levels of investment. Building On Our Transportation Assets
The current needs analysis demonstrates we are not keeping up with maintaining the existing system even though the last few years of project submittals and discussions with Federal-Aid Committees (FAC) confirm that the heavy emphasis has been on maintenance of the existing system. The question is how best to move forward for the 2040 Plan.
In this call for projects, staff recommends staying the course by emphasizing care of the current system. Creating Success measures approved by the General Assembly (that will include a new measure on safety) and MAP-21 considerations, should guide investment decisions. This includes, but is not limited to: o road and bridge condition; o household access to jobs, services, and amenities; o safety; o transit ridership; and o infrastructure utilization rate.
In the call for projects, staff requests that Federal-Aid Committees base their project selection on how well they address these measures and ask that they include a summary of their rationale with their project list submittals.
Recognizing that congestion does exist in certain areas, capacity enhancing projects can still be submitted if they meet certain criteria. In particular, we want to assure that other less costly options have been fully explored before expansion projects are approved.
In addition, staff will provide a project prioritization tool to those counties requesting it, if the counties determine it would assist them in project selection and prioritization.
Moving beyond this current call for projects, increasing emphasis will be placed on SEMCOG’s Creating Success and MAP-21, both of which are based on establishing performance measures and setting targets to guide investment and distribution of transportation revenues. It is clear that in the future, we have to migrate toward a process where decisions on distribution of funds will be increasingly weighted by how proposed projects, individually and in the aggregate, contribute to achieving targets.
This will facilitate improved decision-making by the elected officials of SEMCOG because we will be better positioned to evaluate the tradeoffs associated with various proposed targets. One simplified example: the expected level of performance for safety in the 2035 Plan has already been achieved. Should future programming of projects place less emphasis on further improving safety and more emphasis on maintaining pavement?
Prior to adoption of the plan in June 2013, staff will explore various alternatives for setting targets and identify options for moving forward. This will include tracking the implementation of MAP-21.
Building On Our Transportation Assets
The New Transportation Alternatives Program
SEMCOG’s Creating Success program is focused on achieving six interdependent outcomes: Economic Prosperity; Desirable Communities; Reliable, Quality Infrastructure; Fiscally Sustainable Public Services; Healthy, Attractive Environmental Assets; and, Access to Services, Jobs, Markets, and Amenities.
Because these outcomes are mutually interdependent, the traditional silo-based approach to planning and implementation must continue to be gradually transformed. To begin this transformation, the Executive Committee authorized a pilot program in May 2012.
Subsequently, the federal government adopted a new transportation bill, MAP-21, which either ended or consolidated a number of existing programs. Several of these programs are now included in a new funding category entitled the Transportation Alternatives Program. This program includes many aspects of the old enhancement program and safe routes to schools.
Part of the funding in this program is allocated to the state and part to regions. Southeast Michigan’s portion is currently estimated to be $4.8 million per year. SEMCOG is responsible for selecting projects to be funded under this portion of the program. This program, and the overall goals of MAP-21, very closely resemble the Creating Success initiative. Therefore, staff proposes it be used to implement the Executive Committee’s directive for a pilot program.
The solicitation of projects will include a description of the Transportation Alternatives Program and the criteria that would be used in project selection. Staff proposes the criteria be based on implementing the Creating Success initiative where emphasis is placed on projects designed to help meet several outcomes vital to the region.
While staff will review and assess proposed projects, decisions on which ones to fund belong in the hands of elected officials. Therefore, staff recommendations for projects would be submitted to an existing SEMCOG body of elected officials, the Regional Clearinghouse Review Committee (RC2), for approval. This committee has an established history of making grant decisions. Once selected, projects would be incorporated into the TIP and RTP as it moves through various committees before final adoption of the entire project list.
Staff has already initiated discussions with MDOT on this new program and plans to coordinate with them so we can maximize the benefits to the region in the project selection by each of our organizations.
Building On Our Transportation Assets
Preliminary Policies
The policies provide broad-based direction for plan development. Along with SEMCOG’s Creating Success performance measures, the policies set the stage for subsequently outlining specific actions that should be taken to achieve our outcomes and the MAP-21 goals. As this suggests, we will use our current performance measures – as well as some forthcoming measures such as safety – to monitor our progress. The preliminary policies, presented in no particular order of importance, are:
1. Continuously improve decision-making in project selection and design in order to optimize investments based on their contribution to the region’s six Creating Success outcomes.
2. Improve and/or maintain a safe environment for all travelers.
3. Increase use of the existing transportation system and manage peak demand to reduce costs.
4. Identify areas of major excess road capacity and explore options (such as road diets, bike lanes, decommissioning roadways) for infrastructure that is significantly underused.
5. Maintain the integrity of the region’s investment in transportation infrastructure by identifying and prioritizing needed improvements.
6. Use asset management strategies to maintain or improve Southeast Michigan’s roads, bridges, and transit assets in a state of good repair; this includes increasing emphasis on funding projects that are identified through asset management programs.
7. Develop more stable, dependable transportation funding mechanisms that result in increases in both highway and transit revenues.
8. Protect and enhance the natural environment, including incorporating green infrastructure techniques in transportation infrastructure project design when feasible.
9. Promote Complete Streets concepts that ensure roadways are designed for all users and incorporate a variety of elements that contribute to economic vitality while protecting the environment and providing a higher quality of life.
10. Employ a comprehensive approach for redeveloping assets along commercial and industrial transportation corridors.
11. Collaborate with other infrastructure providers (e.g., water/sewer, utilities, and telecommunication) to better coordinate projects.
Building On Our Transportation Assets
12. Implement SEMCOG’s Congestion Management Process to improve traffic flow in areas of recurring and nonrecurring congestion.
13. Use technology and other travel demand management techniques to improve efficiency and safety of the transportation system.
14. Use our freight system (road, rail, air, and water) to support economic development throughout the region, including improving access to local, national, and global markets.
15. Stimulate investment and economic growth by connecting business travelers with the local, national, and global marketplace.
16. Enhance personal access to services, jobs, markets, and amenities for the region’s many different population groups; this includes persons with disabilities, older adults, low- income and transit-dependent persons, and students, as well as those that have other transportation options.
17. Improve public transit quality and service levels to better serve the needs of residents, employers, and visitors.
18. Improve quality of life and personal health by facilitating walking, biking, and other trails/pathways.
19. Collaborate with the public, particularly populations traditionally underrepresented in the transportation decision-making process.
20. Address issues of transportation safety and security in the regional planning process.
Outreach and Engagement
Engaging and seeking input from SEMCOG’s members, stakeholders, and the general public is an important element in creating the 2040 transportation plan. This provides valuable input that helps inform plan development, allows us to better meet regional needs and build on our assets, and presents opportunities for coordination and collaboration among those with a vested interest in our transportation system. As this suggests, public outreach helps ensure that our planning efforts are not done in isolation and that broader livability principles are embraced. Although our various transportation planning and programming activities are designed to have long-term beneficial effects on the community, these activities may also have an adverse impact on some individuals. Therefore, it is important that citizens know what is being planned and be given every opportunity to provide input and present their views.
Building On Our Transportation Assets
Outreach Activities SEMCOG has been conducting public engagement activities and will continue sharing information and garnering input until the transportation plan is adopted in June 2013. Following the activities outlined in SEMCOG’s Public Participation Plan (2011), these efforts include, but are not limited to:
Formal comment periods: Formal comment periods will continue to be employed at various milestones during plan development. The formal comment period established by federal transportation regulation is a key component to the overall public outreach and engagement strategy. It is conducted in concert with many other public outreach activities designed to create transparency in the planning process and outcomes.
Meetings: A transportation plan display will be present at all SEMCOG meetings, events, and public outreach booths. Additionally, informational tip cards, videos and PowerPoint presentations will be used, as appropriate, at all SEMCOG hosted meetings and events. All SEMCOG meetings and events are open to the public and publicized via news releases, SEMCOG’s bi-weekly e-newsletter (Regional Update), and on SEMCOG’s Web site. The preliminary schedule of future meetings includes: Three focus groups on Sustainability (September-October 2012) Transportation Advisory Council meetings (September 2012-May 2013) SEMCOG Executive Committee meetings (September 2012-May 2013) SEMCOG General Assembly meetings (November 2012, March 2013, June 2013) SEMCOG Task Force meetings (October 2012-December 2012) Presentations to organizations; this includes organizations whose membership may be traditionally underrepresented in the transportation decision-making process (October 2012-May 2013) Investment prioritization Webinar (late 2012/early 2013) Results of public opinion survey Webinar (January) Plan preview Webinar (April 2013) Three public meetings (May 2013)
Publicity and additional means for the public to submit comments: SEMCOG is publicizing plan development and providing additional means for people to submit their thoughts by: Regularly updating SEMCOG’s Web site throughout plan development, including: o providing information at www.semcog.org/2040RegionalTransportationPlan.aspx o using its Think Regional, Act Local blog to highlight plan development and the public outreach schedule of events. Conducting two infrastructure surveys; a statistically significant phone survey in November 2012 and one during September 2012 available on SEMCOG’s Web site for anyone interested in contributing. Sending newsletter articles to public, private, and civic organizations. Building On Our Transportation Assets
Including at least one article per month regarding plan development in Regional Update, SEMCOG’s bi-weekly newsletter. Continually updating its Facebook and Twitter pages with information on plan development and the public outreach event schedule. Maintaining public comment vehicles including: Telephone hot line E-mail ([email protected]) Facebook and Twitter Creating and distributing news releases regarding key events and draft documents (September 2012-May 2013) Pursuing television appearances, editorial board visits and other media strategies (January 2013-May 2013)
Speakers Bureau: SEMCOG’s speakers bureau is designed to deliver important information regarding the transportation planning process and public outreach opportunities available to people who might not otherwise be aware of the role the public has in developing and implementing the region’s transportation plan. Speakers bureau members are available to make presentations to groups on request.
Agency Consultation: SEMCOG engagement in plan development includes consultation with agencies affecting or affected by the transportation system; and coordination with federal, state, and local transportation partners responsible for other planning activities. In Washtenaw and St. Clair Counties, the Washtenaw Area Transportation Study and St. Clair County Transportation Study (agencies responsible for comprehensive transportation planning at the county level) adopted individual county-wide transportation plans, that will be included in 2040 Transportation Plan by reference.
Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan Background Information September 2012
The following information provides additional background and data on points noted in the SEMCOG document, Using Our Transportation Assets to Create Success in Southeast Michigan.
Tables & Figures Page Population and employment trends in the region 1 Trend in pavement condition, 2004-2011 2 Increasing cost of deteriorating pavement 2 Percentage of congested roads, peak period vs. rest of day 3 Road segments with excess capacity 3 Projected impact of new fuel economy standards on Southeast Michigan gas tax revenue 4 Percentage of transit riders with no auto access 4 Comparison of transit ridership in 25 largest metropolitan areas 5 Outcomes and measures for Creating Success in Southeast Michigan 6
In 2040, We’ll Just Be Returning to 2000 Population & Employment Levels Southeast Michigan, 1990-2040 3.6 4.9 1990 2010 2040 3.4 4.8 4,742,083 Population 3.2 4.7
3 4.6 2,786,082 4.5
2.8 (Millions) Population
2.6 4.4 Employment 2.4 4.3 Employment (Millions) Employment 2.2 4.2
2 4.1 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040
Source: SEMCOG 2040 Forecast
1 We're Underinvesting in Our Roads Changing pavement condition
80%
70%
60%
50% Good 40% Fair 30% Poor Percent Lane Miles Percent 20%
10%
0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Source: SEMCOG
Underinvestment leads to increased cost Increasing cost of deteriorating pavement
$2,500,000,000
$2,000,000,000 $2.36 billion
$1,500,000,000
$1,000,000,000 $996 million $500,000,000
$0 2004 20112008 Source: SEMCOG
2 Little Congestion Most of the Day in Southeast Michigan Peak Travel Period Rest of the Day
2% 22%
78% 98%
Congested Roads Uncongested Roads
Source: SEMCOG
Some Roads Have More Capacity Than Needed
Over 700 miles of roadway could potentially be downsized.
Road segments with potential for lane reduction
Source: SEMCOG
3 Road Funding: From Bad to Worse Gas tax revenue resulting from new fuel economy standards Southeast Michigan
$400 $350 $300 $205 million/yr millions) $250 By 2040 $200 $150 $100 $50
Annual Revenue (in Revenue Annual $0
Tax Revenue w/pre-2009 fuel economy standards Tax Revenue w/2012-2016 fuel economy standards Tax Revenue w/proposed 2017-2025 standards Source: SEMCOG
Most Transit Riders Don’t Have Access to a Vehicle
80% 73% 70% 64% 60% 60% 52% 50% 40% 38% 30% 20% 10% 0% DDOT SMART Ann Arbor Lake Erie Blue Water Transit Transit Transit Source: SEMCOG 2010 -2011 On-Board Transit Survey
4
Southeast Michigan Ranks 22nd in Transit Ridership Among 25 Largest Metropolitan Areas
2010 2010 2010 Metropolitan Rank Urbanized Area Average Weekday Daily Riders per Area Population Transit Trips 1000 Population 1 New York 18,351,295 12,967,069 706.60 2 Washington, D.C. 4,586,770 1,573,761 343.11 San Francisco - 3 4,062,254 1,383,341 340.54 Oakland 4 Sacramento 1,723,634 508,791 295.19 5 Boston 4,181,019 1,228,156 293.75 6 Chicago 8,608,208 2,027,571 235.54 7 Philadelphia 5,441,567 1,194,046 219.43 8 Portland 1,849,898 352,329 190.46 9 Seattle 3,059,393 555,911 181.71 10 Los Angeles 12,150,996 2,123,856 174.79 11 Baltimore 2,203,663 354,873 161.04 12 Denver 2,374,203 322,942 136.02 13 Salt Lake City 1,021,243 134,736 131.93 14 Pittsburgh 1,733,853 225,846 130.26 15 Atlanta 4,515,419 486,801 107.81 16 San Diego 2,956,746 289,945 98.06 17 Minneapolis 2,650,890 255,920 96.54 18 Miami 5,502,379 477,850 86.84 19 Cleveland 1,780,673 146,181 82.09 20 St. Louis 2,150,706 138,810 64.54 21 Houston 4,944,332 277,614 56.15 22 Southeast Michigan 4,127,218 193,046 46.77 23 Dallas-Fort Worth 5,121,892 228,110 44.54 24 Tampa 2,441,770 87,832 35.97 25 Phoenix 3,629,114 127,476 35.13 Source: Compiled by SEMCOG from the Federal Transit Administration's National Transit Database.
5
atright.) examples six outcomes. sentiment related to all public measure general, they will regional survey.In will be based on a reflect theoutcomes that measures Several
We Manage What We Measure: (See (Performance Measures)
We Manage What We Measure: Performance Measures Outcomes Matrix Creating SuccessinSoutheastMichigan October 27,2011 Southeast MichiganCouncil ofGovernments degree orabove and overwith a bachelor Percent ofpopulation age 25 D Gross realregional in Change degree and overwith an associate Percent g Industry concentration Change in j Labor u rate Poverty p Real Consumer confidence
(U-
(See examplesabove.) Several measuresthatreflecttheoutcomes will bebasedonaregionalsurvey. Ingeneral,theywillmeasurepublicsentimentrelatedto allsixoutcomes. rowth omestic P 6) Economic Prosperity
er capita
of populationage 25 nderutilization obs roduct (GDP) p
ersonal . CreatingSuccess inSoutheastMichigan
r ate ’s income ’s Creating SuccessinSoutheastMichigan
rate crime Property Violent crime rate Percent scores) and science(MEAP proficiency in reading, m students at or above - Access to amenities such as: occupi Number/percent ACT scores community in reside to desire People’s Migration rates - Voter participation rate - - - - Access to services such as:
- - -
Desirable Communities entertainment venues entertainment attractions museums/cultural parks walking/biking facilities sports venues educational institutions facilities/hospitals medical libraries libraries stores full service grocery ed housing units of 4
th and 8
of
th grade What We Need To Achieve: (Outcomes)
What WeWhat NeedtoAchieve: Outcomes ath,
to budget unfunded liabilities relative Local governments local government services satis Citizen budget governments with multi- Number of region’s local
- numberthat– are: Score Community Indicator Fiscal Municipal c
- -
f f f iscal iscal iscal Fiscal
Public Services
n stress stress w eutral ly atch Sustainab redit rating faction with
le
year 6
- consumption: demand andtotal service infrastructure Peak Transit ridership - - sewer systemsewer in good, fai poor condition meeting standards standards meeting water, and sewer systems quali with satisfaction Citizen
- Percent of water and and water Percent of Infrastructure fair, fair, Percent Percent fair, poor, condition Percent
water energy sewer transportation
poor condition Re ty/reliability ofroads, Infrastructure ofdrinking water of bridges in good, of roads in good, liable
u , Quality tilization
r
r, ate
species Number of known invasive Diversity of fish species rivers in (bugs) macroinvertebrates Condition of nice place to live makingenvironment thisa Perceptions about outdoor
water quality impairments Number flowing into our waterways Volume of stormwater standards airquality with compliance Percent Percent Environmental Assets Healthy,
of time in of green cover of areaswith known Attractive
Percent
B services and environment/recreation, jobs, amenities, outdoor to get to ability Residents’ Rate of export activity activity export of Rate - services suchas: reasonable accessto Percent access tojobs Percent - - suchas: amenities reasonable accessto - - -
- - -
roadband a
Acces
educational institutions facilities/hospitals medical entertainment venues entertainment stores full service grocery libraries attractions museums/cultural facilities facilities walking/biking parks sports venues Jobs, Markets,& of households with of households with of households with
Amenities
s toServices, ccessibility
Paul E. Tait, CAE Executive Director
DATE September 28, 2012
TO: SEMCOG Executive Committee
SUBJECT: Update of Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
Summary of action requested The Executive Committee is requested to adopt the 2012 update of the comprehensive economic development strategy, Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan.
Policy implications Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan conveys the fundamental steps that are needed for the region to successfully compete in the global economy. It provides a framework for, and relies upon, collaboration among numerous organizations to implement its recommended actions. The economic development strategy may also enhance grant applicants’ ability to obtain funding from the Economic Development Administration (EDA) as well as a variety of other public and private funding sources.
This update is coordinated with SEMCOG programs. For example, it supports SEMCOG’s Creating Success in Southeast Michigan initiative, which sets forth a common set of outcomes and performance measures that multiple organizations may use in their work to better our region. It is also integrated with the long-range transportation plan and transportation programs, reflects the regional plan for sustainable development, and is consistent with SEMCOG’s environmental programs.
Background Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan was originally adopted in 2010. This update helps ensure we have a dynamic economic development strategy that is evolving to reflect the region’s current and future needs, which is important as we continue positioning ourselves to be successful in a globally competitive environment. Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan addresses our challenges and takes advantage of opportunities by focusing on our strengths and how we can distinguish Southeast Michigan from the competition through a cohesive, action-oriented plan. It builds upon, rather than duplicates, existing programs and includes 11 broad-based strategies and associated action steps that encompass the region’s human resources, business climate, and community assets – three important factors for attracting, retaining, expanding, and creating businesses and jobs.
Action by other committees The update builds on previous work, and was informed by the SEMCOG/MAC Economic Development Strategy Committee and a Technical Review Team. Public comment is also being Update of Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
solicited following the strategies outlined in SEMCOG’s Public Participation Plan (December 2011).
Action requested The Executive Committee is requested to approve the attached resolution.
Executive Committee Resolution To Adopt Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan Update
WHEREAS, efforts must continue to position Southeast Michigan to be successful in a globally competitive environment;
WHEREAS, a comprehensive, cohesive, action-oriented approach is needed to address the region’s challenges, build on our strengths, and create economic prosperity;
WHEREAS, SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, in cooperation with Metropolitan Affairs Coalition, and with guidance from members of the Economic Development Strategy Committee and Technical Review Team, updated Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan that sets forth strategies and action steps to grow jobs, stimulate investment, and create economic opportunity;
WHEREAS, collectively, the recommended strategies and action steps address the region’s human resources, business climate, and community assets – important factors in attracting, retaining, expanding, and creating businesses and jobs;
WHEREAS, collaborative public/private sector action is needed to promote and implement the range of recommendations set forth in Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, this 28th day of September 2012 THAT the Executive Committee of SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, approves adoption of the 2012 update of the comprehensive economic development strategy, Increasing Jobs and Prosperity in Southeast Michigan.
ATTEST: DATE: Committee Clerk
White House Issues Preliminary Report on Sequestration – At Congress’ request, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) recently released a report detailing the impact of the budget sequester that will go into effect on January 2, 2013. The automatic cuts would reduce spending across more than 1,200 federal accounts trimming defense by $54.67 billion (9.4 percent), domestic discretionary spending by $38 billion (8.2 percent), Medicare by $11 billion (2 percent) and other mandatory spending programs by about $5 billion as required under the August 2011 debt limit law, P.L. 112-25.
The report described the sequestration as having a “devastating impact,” on defense spending noting the cuts “would result in a reduction in readiness of many non-deployed units, delays in investments in new equipment and facilities, cutbacks in equipment repairs, declines in military research and development efforts, and reductions in base services for military families.” Cuts to weapons systems were not detailed in the reports, but they would be made at the same 9.4 percent level. War spending also would be cut, but military personnel accounts would be exempt from the sequester. Non-defense cuts would come at lower rates — an 8.2 percent reduction in discretionary and 7.6 percent in mandatory spending. Among the cuts would be $1.3 billion from aid to low-income school districts and $471 million from the payment next year to the national Highway Trust Fund.
Sequestration Will Have Significant Impact on Transportation Programs. The preliminary report released by the White House indicates transportation programs will experience significant cuts if automatic budget cuts, known as sequestration, take place on January 2, 2013. According to the estimates released by the White House approximately $1.5 billion will be cut from roads, transit and rail in 2013 unless Congress acts to prevent the cuts. Shrinking or preventing those cuts requires Congress and the White House to strike a budget deal before January 2. Although many highway programs are protected from the cuts because they are funded through the highway trust fund, all general fund transfers to the trust fund would be impacted. All non-exempt transportation programs will be subjected to a 7.6 to 8.2% cut, depending on the program. Details of the estimated cuts include:
$471 million of General Fund transfer to Highway Trust Fund $41 million (of the $500 million total) from the TIGER Grant Program $176 million from transit programs including $156 million from Capital Grants $131 million from Amtrak, including $78 million from Capital Grants $3 million from Federal Rail research and development
Farm Bill May Expire – The current Farm Bill expires on September 30th and while the Senate passed a version, there has been no movement by House leadership to give floor consideration to the House Agriculture Committee passed Farm Bill, H.R. 6083. A short-term extension until after the elections or a one-year extension appear to be increasingly likely scenarios. In addition, there is some speculation that the Farm Bill will be allowed to expire until after the elections. On Thursday, September 13, a bipartisan group of thirty-nine House members including nine Republicans signed a discharge petition to move the bill to the House floor. A majority of House members would have to sign the petition to force the House leadership to actually bring up the House Agriculture Committee-passed Farm Bill on the floor for consideration. Discharge petitions rarely work, but they sometimes force House leaders to bring up a bill to avoid the embarrassment of a display of opposition. New CAFÉ Standards Finalized – On August 28th, the Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration finalized new standards that will increase fuel economy for cars and light- duty trucks to the equivalent of 54.5 mpg by Model Year 2025. It is expected that automakers will use a range of efficient and advanced technologies to transform the vehicle fleet and achieve these standards, which provide for a mid-term evaluation to allow the agencies to review their effectiveness and make any needed adjustments. The program also includes targeted incentives to encourage early adoption and introduction into the marketplace of advanced technologies to improve vehicle performance, including:
Incentives for electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and fuel cells vehicles; Incentives for hybrid technologies for large pickups and for other technologies that achieve high fuel economy levels on large pickups; Incentives for natural gas vehicles; and Credits for technologies with potential to achieve real-world greenhouse gas reductions and fuel economy improvements that are not captured by the standards test procedures.
Continuing Resolution Prevents Government Shutdown. As a result of the impending November elections, Congress has found it challenging to reach an agreement on many of the major issues they must address. However, one of the few areas where the House, Senate and Obama Administration have been able to reach an agreement is related to a Continuing Resolution (CR) that will keep the government operating through March 31, 2013 and avert a potential government shutdown. The agreement will allow all government agencies and programs to continue operating during the first six months of the fiscal year at an annualized rate of $1.047 trillion in discretionary spending for regular appropriations, the level set by last year's Budget Control Act. It generally increases current funding for most federal programs and agencies by 0.6%, provides even higher funding levels for several priorities such as cybersecurity and wildfire suppression. The bill also includes language to prevent the Pentagon from taking proposed action to retire or transfer certain aircraft including, the A-10s from Selfridge Air National Guard Base. By extending funding for the government for the first half of the fiscal year, Congress will be able to focus its attention on other must-do items, such as expiring tax provision and the sequester without the threat of a government shutdown.
Congress Leaves Major Issues for Lame Duck. On Friday, September 21, both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate adjourned and are not expected to reconvene until after the November elections. As a result, Congress will be forced to deal with major issues such as sequestration, the expiration of all income tax rates, Medicare payments to physicians, unemployment benefits, the payroll tax holiday and the extension of expiring business tax provisions. While it may be nearly impossible for Congress to pass legislation to address all of these issues in what is likely to be a four to six week lame duck session, it is equally impossible for Congress to ignore the consequences of inaction. As a result, Congress is expected to explore a number of possible paths to address these issues ranging from comprehensive tax reform and a “grand bargain” related to deficit reduction to a temporary extension to many of these expiring provisions. The actual route Congress takes will likely be determined by the outcome of the election. Currently, most experts believe Republicans will continue to maintain a majority in the House of Representatives while there is a possibility control of the Senate could shift from the Democrats to Republicans. If the elections result in either a change in Senate control or a new Presidential Administration, the likelihood of a robust lame duck session diminishes dramatically and outcome of a lame duck session is likely to be short-term extensions of expiring policies. If President Obama is re- elected and the majorities in each chamber of Congress remain the same, many expect leaders in Washington to attempt to tackle many of these urgent issues in a lame duck session.
This update was prepared by Andy Buczek and Mary Beth McGowan, Government Policy Advisors with Dykema’s Federal Government Relations Practice.
As part of our service to you, we regularly compile short reports on new and interesting developments and the issues the developments raise. Please recognize that these reports do not constitute legal advice and that we do not attempt to cover all such developments. Rules of certain state supreme courts may consider this advertising and require us to advise you of such designation. Your comments are always welcome. © 2012 Dykema Gossett PLLC. SEMCOG Officers 2012-2013
Michael Sedlak Chairperson Clerk, Green Oak Township
Joan Gebhardt First Vice Chair Treasurer, Schoolcraft College
Jeffrey Jenks Vice Chairperson Commissioner, Huntington Woods
Phil LaJoy Vice Chairperson Supervisor, Canton Township
Charles Pugh Vice Chairperson Council President, City of Detroit
Kathy D. Vosburg Vice Chairperson Board of Commissioners Chair, Macomb County
John A. Scott Immediate Past Chair Commissioner, Oakland County
Paul E. Tait Executive Director