DOCSLIB.ORG

“Wasted Votes"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Research and “WASTED VOTES" Information A Look at Invalid Ballots and Votes Center The Knesset for Lists that did not Cross the Electoral Threshold www.knesset.gov.il/mmm April 5th 2021 | 23 Nisan 5781 During the vote-counting process of each national election, many votes are not THE VOTE-COUNTING included in the calculation of how seats in PROCESS the Knesset are to be distributed among the electoral lists. These can be seen as "wasted votes." There are two types of "wasted votes”: Total number of voters Invalid ballots Valid ballots that were cast for lists that did not cross the electoral threshold, which is currently set at 3.25%. Although neither type of ballot is taken into account when calculating the number of Knesset seats that each list receives, there is an important distinction between the two. Because only valid ballots are counted for the purpose of calculating the electoral threshold, invalid ballots are not taken into account for this calculation, while valid ballots cast for lists Invalid Number of valid ballots, used to that did not cross the electoral threshold are. ballots calculate the electoral threshold “WASTED VOTES” th th 20 Knesset–24 Knesset Votes for lists that Invalid Percentage of did not cross the votes “wasted votes” (out electoral threshold of the total number of voters) 366,016 Votes for lists that Number of votes required did not cross the for each Knesset seat 189,517 126,704 electoral threshold (the general indicator) 43,854 36,901 64,752 30,983 28,362 25,073 26,752 Division of 5.48% 9.15% 3.47% 1.34% 2.05% seats among 20th 21 th 22th 23th 24th the lists Knesset Knesset Knesset Knesset Knesset order to enter the Knesset. The electoral threshold has gradually been raised over theyears: beenraisedover theKnesset. hasgradually enter electoral to The threshold order in validballotsthatalistmustreceive ofthetotal isthepercentage electoralThe threshold theelectoralcross threshold didnot cast liststhat for votes Valid that were cast for lists that did not cross theelectoral threshold. liststhat didnotcross castfor that were dealoffluctuationvotes inthenumber ofvalid hasbeenagreat there shows, the graph As Constituent Assembly- 0.83 % st 8.6 % Until the elections for the Until theelections for After the elections for the After theelections for it hasnotbeenchangedsince. the electoral threshold was the electoral threshold was the electoral threshold From the elections for the theelections for From 1 Knesset the theelections for From (OUT OF ALL VALID BALLOTS) VALID OFALL (OUT THE ELECTORALTHRESHOLD CROSS DID NOT CASTTHAT VOTES FORLISTS OF PERCENTAGE Electoral threshold Electoral threshold nd 2 Knesset 0.6% 3rd Knesset 2.4% 4th Knesset 4.6% 5th Knesset 0.7% 6th Knesset 2.9% 1 12 % 19 13 7th Knesset 1.1% 17 2% 1.5% th th th th Knesset was (1988)theelectoral threshold Knesset the19thKnesset the elections (2006)to for (2013), Knesset the16thKnesset the elections (1992)to for (2003), 8th Knesset 4.8% Knesset, wasraisedto theelectoral threshold . 9th Knesset 2.7% 10th Knesset 5.2% 11th Knesset 2.8% 12th Knesset 2.4% th 13 Knesset 5.0% th 14 Knesset 2.6% 1. 5 % 15th Knesset 6.0% 16th Knesset 4.2% 17th Knesset 5.8% 1% 2 3.25% . 18th Knesset 3.1% % 19th Knesset 7.1% , and 20th Knesset 4.5% 21st Knesset 8.5% 3.25 22nd Knesset 2.9% % 23rd Knesset 0.8% 24th Knesset 1.5% identical ballots would likewiseidentical ballotswould notbeinvalidated. withthree amended in2017sothatanenvelope further was law The lower. significantly was ballots twoof disqualified the number elections, following In the notbeinvalidated. two identicalballotswould with the Knesset anenvelope Elections whereby Law anamendmentto May 1973,theKnesset approved in a result, As envelope. single a in placed been had identicalballots becausetwo ormore invalidated thatmostofthesewere examination, itwasfound cast. Upon —4.2%ofallthevotes of 60,000votes Those elections thedisqualification saw disqualified. ballotswere withtwoKnesset, ormore envelopes theSeventh andincludingtheelectionsUp to for Arabic translation. use aHebrew-only with ballotorainHebrew may Voters andname. letter theHebrew to correspond which Elections theCentral by Committee, approved andname addtheArabicletter addition, alistmay list.Inthe letter—or thenameandletter—of agiven andthey mustbearnothingbut Elections Committee, theCentral by approved withatemplate in accordance printed be to ballots are 1969, Version), (Consolidated Section to 76oftheKnessetAccording Elections Law ballots Invalid Constituent Assembly- ballots. otherinvalid from separately notcounted theseblankballotsare vote, castablankballotasprotest may some voters though even Therefore, theirdisqualification. for with nodistinction thereasons madebetween asasingleunit, counted ballotsare invalid All 1st Knesset 1.23% nd 2 Knesset 1.08% rd 3 Knesset 2.61% th 4 Knesset 2.51% th 5 Knesset 2.90% th 6 Knesset 3.05% 7th Knesset 4.22% 8th Knesset 2.14% 9th Knesset 1.35% 10th Knesset 0.88% 11th Knesset 0.86% 12th Knesset 0.97% 13th Knesset 0.80% NUMBER OF INVALID VOTES (OUT OF (OUT VOTES NUMBER OFINVALID th 2.17% ballots Blank 14 Knesset Committee Elections theCentral by ones provided other thanthe Envelopes ballots non-identical ormore two containing Envelopes identity the voter's reveal could marks that with envelopes Ballots in ARE INVALID VOTES THE FOLLOWING THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS) THE TOTAL 15th Knesset 1.91% 16th Knesset 1.64% th בב Knesset 1.56% 17 th 1.26% אא Knesset 18 19th Knesset 1.07% committee of thepoll members two of signature the lacking Envelopes ballots identical three than more containing Envelopes blue pen other thana something with marked Ballots name or letter list’s other thanthe something with marked Ballots 20th Knesset 1.03% 21st Knesset 0.71% 22nd Knesset 0.64% אא אא 23rd Knesset 0.54% אא אא 24th Knesset 0.59% Examination of the data on the votes cast for electoral lists that did not cross the electoral threshold points to a distinction between a relatively small number of lists that were fairly close to the threshold and a larger number of lists that were quite far from it. The diagram below presents the following data the last four elections: the number of votes cast for lists that did not cross the electoral threshold but received at least 1% of the valid votes, and the total number of votes cast for lists that received less than 1% of all the valid votes. VOTES FOR LISTS THAT DID NOT CROSS THE ELECTORAL THRESHOLD (OUT OF ALL VALID BALLOTS) Yachad Crossed: Did not cross: (125,158 votes) 2.97% th 95.50% 4.50% Green Leaf 20 (4,021,367 (189,517 (47,180 votes) 1.21% Knesset votes) votes) 13 other lists (17,179 votes) 0.41% New Right (138,598 votes) 3.22% Crossed: Did not cross: Zehut 91.51 % 8.49% th (118,031 votes) 2.74% 21 (3,943,254 (366,016 Knesset votes) votes) Gesher (74,701 votes) 1.73% 26 other lists (34,686 votes) 0.80% Crossed: Did not cross: Otzma Yehudit % % th 97.14 2.86 (83,609 votes) 1.88% 22 (4,310,102 (126,704 Knesset votes) votes) 19 other lists (43,095 votes) 0.97% Crossed: Did not cross: th 99.20% 0.80% 21 lists 23 (4,533,161 (36,901 (36,901 votes) 0.80% Knesset votes) votes) Crossed: Did not cross: % % th 98.53 1.47 25 lists 24 (4,345,300 (64,752 (64,752 votes) 1.47% Knesset votes) votes) Sources: Knesset website: www.knesset.gov.il ■ Central Elections Committee, bechirot.gov.il ■ Israel Democracy Institute, Elections and parties, accessed, March 2nd 2021 ■ Assaf Shapiro, What happens to invalid votes?, Israel Democracy Institute, February 17th 2021 [Hebrew] ■ Meir Chazan, The preparations for the elections to the Constituent Assembly in 1949, in Mordechai Bar-On and Meir Chazan (eds.), Politics in wartime: Studies on the civilian society during the Israeli War of Independence, Jerusalem, 2014, pp. 88–126 [Hebrew] ■ Judah Troen, The electoral threshold and changes over time: A comparative review, Knesset Research and Information Center, January 20th 2019 [Hebrew] ■ Rinat Benita, Spotlight on the Israeli elections for the 22nd Knesset, Knesset Research and Information Center, September 3rd 2019 [Hebrew] ■ Central Elections Committee for the Twenty-third Knesset, Appendix to the memorandum on the results of the elections for the 23rd Knesset: Details on the distribution of mandates, March 2020 [Hebrew]. Written by: Rami Schwartz | Approved by: Orly Almagor Lotan | Language editing: Knesset Record staff | Graphic design: Knesset Printing and Publications Department.
Recommended publications

  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-13864-3 — the Israeli Settler Movement Sivan Hirsch-Hoefler , Cas Mudde Index More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-13864-3 — The Israeli Settler Movement Sivan Hirsch-Hoefler , Cas Mudde Index More Information Index 1948 Arab–Israeli War, the, 2 Ariel, Uri, 76, 116 1949 Armistice Agreements, the, 2 Arutz Sheva, 120–121, 154, 205 1956 Sinai campaign, the, 60 Ashkenazi, 42, 64, 200 1979 peace agreement, the, 57 Association for Retired People, 23 Australia, 138 Abrams, Eliott, 59 Aviner, Shlomo, 65, 115, 212 Academic Council for National, the. See Professors for a Strong Israel B’Sheva, 120 action B’Tselem, 36, 122 connective, 26 Barak, Ehud, 50–51, 95, 98, 147, 235 extreme, 16 Bar-Ilan University, 50, 187 radical, 16 Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov, 194, 216 tactical, 34 Bat Ayin Underground, the, 159 activism BDS. See Boycott, Divestment and moderate, 15–16 Sanctions transnational, 30–31 Begin, Manahem, 47, 48, 118–119, Adelson, Sheldon, 179, 190 157, 172 Airbnb, 136 Beit El, 105 Al Aqsa Mosque, the, 146 Beit HaArava, 45 Al-Aqsa Intifada. See the Second Intifada Beitar Illit, 67, 70, 99 Alfei Menashe, 100 Beitar Ironi Ariel, 170 Allon, Yigal, 45–46 Belafonte, Harry, 14 Alon Shvut, 88, 190 Ben Ari, Michael, 184 Aloni, Shulamit, 182 Bendaña, Alejandro, 24 Altshuler, Amos, 189 Ben-Gurion, David, 46 Amana, 76–77, 89, 113, 148, 153–154, 201 Ben-Gvir, Itamar, 184 American Friends of Ariel, 179–180 Benn, Menachem, 164 American Studies Association, 136 Bennett, Naftali, 76, 116, 140, 148, Amnesty International, 24 153, 190 Amona, 79, 83, 153, 157, 162, 250, Benvenisti, Meron, 1 251 Ben-Zimra, Gadi, 205 Amrousi, Emily, 67, 84 Ben-Zion,
  • S Election Results

    S Election Results

    The Challenge of Israel’s Election Results I wrote the following for the latest newsletter of the World Union of Meretz, from the J Street Conference in Washington, DC. Representatives of all of the Israeli opposition gathered there, meeting together with its counterparts from American Jewry, who clearly represent the majority of American Jews. The final polls allowed on Friday the 13th, four days before election day, had given the Zionist Union (Labor & Hatnua) led by Herzog and Livni a lead of 24 to 20 seats, with an even chance to lead the next government. Netanyahu then went into emergency mode, using every demagogic trick in the book to turn the results around. He warned the leadership of the settlers that “the left” was on the verge of winning, and would begin to evacuate settlements, so they mobilized en masse, coming in thousands to Likud strongholds in the outlying and development towns to get out the vote. Mobilizing the extreme right to abandon Naftali Bennet’s Jewish Home party, Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu and the ultra-right Yachad party (led by Shas refugee Eli Yishai in alliance with Kahanist Baruch Marzel), Netanyahu renounced his support for a two-state solution, and on election day warned that Israeli Arabs were voting in droves, being “bussed in by Jewish left-wingers” supported by foreign money. This last claim was ridiculous, since Israeli Arab citizens were simply walking to the polling booths, exercising their democratic right to vote, and energized by the fact that the four Arab parties had united in a Joint Arab List to ensure that they would pass the minimum voter threshold that had been raised to try to prevent them from entering the Knesset.
  • Assessment Report

    Assessment Report

    ASSESSMENT REPORT Policy Analysis Unit - ACRPS | Mar 2015 Netanyahu Returns as Prime Minister: What Lies Ahead? Series: Assessment Report Policy Analysis Unit – ACRPS | Mar 2015 Copyright © 2015 Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies. All Rights Reserved. ____________________________ The Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies is an independent research institute and think tank for the study of history and social sciences, with particular emphasis on the applied social sciences. The Center’s paramount concern is the advancement of Arab societies and states, their cooperation with one another and issues concerning the Arab nation in general. To that end, it seeks to examine and diagnose the situation in the Arab world - states and communities- to analyze social, economic and cultural policies and to provide political analysis, from an Arab perspective. The Center publishes in both Arabic and English in order to make its work accessible to both Arab and non-Arab researchers. Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies PO Box 10277 Street No. 826, Zone 66 Doha, Qatar Tel.: +974 44199777 | Fax: +974 44831651 www.dohainstitute.org Table of Contents Introduction Error! Bookmark not defined. Characteristics of the electoral process 1 A new political landscape 2 Factors influencing the election outcome 3 Conclusion 5 NETANYAHU RETURNS AS PRIME MINISTER: WHAT LIES AHEAD? Introduction The nationalist camp, led by incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud party, secured a comfortable majority of 67 out of a total 120 seats in elections to the twentieth Knesset, which were held on March 17, 2015. With this win, Netanyahu will be able to form a new government in the coming few weeks.
  • Israel National Election Study, April 9, 2019 Pre and Post Election Inclusive Questionnaires

    Israel National Election Study, April 9, 2019 Pre and Post Election Inclusive Questionnaires

    2019 Survey Id (from a list)_______________ Israel National Election Study, April 9, 2019 Pre and Post Election Inclusive Questionnaires Pre-election Inclusive Questionnaire – April 2019 Throughout the questionnaire: 98 Don’t know/no answer; 99 Refuses to answer 1. Version 1. Version A (Green+Blue) 2. Version B (Green+Red) Hi, my name is….. I am an interviewer from Tel Aviv University. You were chosen randomly to participate in an academic survey dealing with various issues. It is very important that everyone who was sampled will participate in order to ensure the quality of the research. Your answers will remain confidential and will be used only for the study. 2. How old are you______________ ? Interview only 18 and above For those who did not answer: 3. What age group do you belong to? 1. 18-22 2. 23-29 3. 30-39 4. 40-49 5. 50-59 6. 60-69 7. 70-79 8. 80 and over Interview only 18 and above 4. Sex: 1. Male 2. Female 136. What is your highest level of education: 1. Elementary school or less 2. Partial high school 3. Complete high school - without matriculation diploma 4. Complete high school with matriculation diploma 5. Post high school, non-academic (teacher’s seminar, nursing school, engineering school, yeshiva) 6. Partial academic degree 7. Full academic degree - BA 8. Full academic degree - MA or higher 2019 Survey 5. Are you an Israeli citizen? 1. Yes 2. No → End interview Interview only Israeli citizens 6. In your opinion, what is Israel's general situation? 1.
  • “It's the National Ethos, Stupid”! – Understanding the Political

    “It's the National Ethos, Stupid”! – Understanding the Political

    International Journal of Social Science Studies Vol. 4, No. 7; July 2016 ISSN 2324-8033 E-ISSN 2324-8041 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://ijsss.redfame.com “It’s the National Ethos, Stupid”! – Understanding the Political Psychology of the Israeli 2015 Elections Using Data from the National Resilience Survey Eyal Lewin1 1Ariel University, Israel. Correspondence: Eyal Lewin, Ariel University, Israel. Received: May 9, 2016 Accepted: May 26, 2016 Available online: May 31, 2016 doi:10.11114/ijsss.v4i7.1651 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v4i7.1651 Abstract From a socio-political point of view, the results of the Israeli 2015 elections reflect an ongoing stagnation that is described in detail in this research. This stagnation is often explained by theories of social collective identities. However, none of the theories examines how group identities are created. Consequently, this study explains how different forms of national ethos shape political identities and interweave with them. Relying on a wide set of data from the National Resilience Survey launched by the National Security Studies Center at Haifa University, this research examines the way Israeli political parties differ according to voters' attitudes on matters of national ethos. The findings show how opposing parties correspond with the two distinct forms of national ethos. However, the data also reveals that the ethos clash is not necessarily a dichotomy, but rather a continuum where various parties are located along a spectrum between the poles. Keywords: group identity, national ethos, voter behavior, political stagnation, republicanism, liberalism. 1. Introduction A friend of mine called me excitedly on the morning of March 17, 2015.
  • Making Sense of the Israeli Election

    Making Sense of the Israeli Election

    Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Norwich, CT 06360 Permit #329 Serving The Jewish Communities of Eastern Connecticut & Western R.I. CHANGE SERVICE RETURN TO: 28 Channing St., New London, CT 06320 REQUESTED VOL. XLV NO. 8 PUBLISHED BI-WEEKLY APRIL 12, 2019/7 NISAN 5779 NEXT DEADLINE APRIL 19, 2019 16 PAGES HOW TO REACH US - PHONE 860-442-8062 • FAX 860-443-4175 • EMAIL [email protected] • BY MAIL: 28 CHANNING STREET, NEW LONDON, CT 06320 What is Making sense of Besere the Israeli election By Herb Keinon, Jerusalem Post Velt? Al Davis, the iconic owner of the NFL Oakland Raiders football The 25th East- team, had a well-known mott: “Just win, baby!” ern CT Int’l Film It is not important how you win, just that you win. This sentiment Festival opening is Sunday, May 19, Green Bay Packers coach Vince Lombardi, who once said, “Winning 2:00 pm at The isn’treflected everything, the motto it is theof an only even thing.” earlier fabled NFL legend, this time Garde Arts Center A Besere Velt, Boston Workmen’s Circle in New London. It Community Chorus will be featured during Yom truly will be a gala the Jewish Federation’s Gala Opening of the What is true on the football field, is even truer in politics. And opening to cele- its 25th Anniversary Eastern CT Int’l Film Fes- Ha’atzmaut knowsPrime Ministerhow to win. Benjamin He has Netanyahu,the political who antennae is poised to know for the what fifth it takes time brate the festival’s tival on Sunday, May 19, 2 pm at The Garde celebration to yetwin, again what be is tabbedneeded by to theenthuse president his base, to set and up then the next goes government, after it – no quarter century.
  • Yachad Ministries' Israel's News Update June 24, 2021 (14 Tamuz

    Yachad Ministries' Israel's News Update June 24, 2021 (14 Tamuz

    Yachad Ministries’ Israel's News Update June 24, 2021 (14th Tamuz, 5781) For the Yachad Report Newsletter For June 2021 Texas First US State to Adopt IHRA Definition of Anti-Semitism; Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed a bill Wednesday adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti- Semitism. Texas is the first US state to officially adopt the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism. The State Senate and House of Representatives both passed the bill to adopt the definition without any dissenting votes. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations praised Texas for adopting the widely accepted tool for identifying anti-Semitism. 4.2 Earthquake Rocks Dead Sea; A magnitude 4.2 earthquake was felt in southern Israel on Tuesday night, June 15, at 2:08 AM. The epicenter of the quake was 68 kilometers northeast of Eilat and a depth of ten kilometers. According to statistics and seismic history, the region should experience a major quake every 80- 100 years. The last major quake was on July 11, 1927, and registered 6.2 on the Richter Scale killing 500 people. Another major earthquake is therefore now due. As terrifying as earthquakes can be, there may be a silver lining to an increase in regional seismic activity. In a 2007 article in the J-Post, Dr. Shmuel Marco, Head of the School of the Environment and Earth Sciences at Tel Aviv University, noted that prophets became active a certain number of years after major earthquakes. Major earthquakes were recorded in the Jordan Valley in the years 31 BCE, 363 CE, 749 CE, and 1033 CE.
  • Evidence from Israel

    Evidence from Israel

    The Effects of Attachment to an Ideological Group in Multi-Party Systems: Evidence from Israel Odelia Oshri*1 [email protected] Omer Yair [email protected] Leonie Huddy [email protected] Abstract This paper argues that, in multiparty systems, individuals’ attachment to an ideological group – their "identity-based ideology" – can powerfully predict their political behavior and attitudes, irrespective of their policy preferences. In two studies conducted in Israel (N = 1,320), each incorporating a vignette experiment, we draw on social identity research and test the effects of a multi- item Attachment to an Ideological Group (AIG) scale. We show that, even controlling for issue preferences or left-right ideological self-placement, the AIG scale strongly predicts intentions to vote for a party from one's ideological camp. The AIG scale also strongly predicts levels of affective polarization, motivated reasoning, and reactions to new politically relevant information. Notably, the effects of the AIG scale are consistently stronger than the effects of issue preferences or ideological self-placement. These findings underscore the importance of attachment to an ideological group in today’s volatile democratic multiparty systems. * Odelia Oshri is a Lecturer in the department of Political Science and the European Forum at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Omer Yair is a postdoctoral fellow at The Federmann School of Public Policy and Government, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Leonie Huddy is a professor in the department of Political Science at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. We wish to thank Matthew Graham, Alon Yakter, Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan and Shaul Shenhav for helpful comments.
  • Parents of Lone Soldiers

    Parents of Lone Soldiers

    LONE SOLDIERS PROGRAM Informational Booklet FOR Parents of Lone Soldiers 1 Table of Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 6 Programs for Enlisting in the IDF ...............................................................................................7 Being Drafted to the IDFF Tzav Rishon ................................................................................................................................... 8 Medical Profile ............................................................................................................................. 9 Filing an Appeal and Updating the Military System ................................................................10 Ra’ayon Tash ................................................................................................................................. 10 Process of Classification Process of Classification .............................................................................................................11 Being an Only Child in the IDF ....................................................................................................11 Recruitment Tracks Involving Academic Study .......................................................................12 Determining Job Placement........................................................................................................12
  • July 2021 Tammuz-Av 5781

    July 2021 Tammuz-Av 5781

    Jewish Federation of Reading/Berks Non-Profit Organization Jewish Cultural Center, PO Box 14925 U.S. Postage PAID Reading, PA 19612-4925 Permit No. 2 readingjewishcommunity.org Reading, PA Change Service Requested Enriching Lives Volume 51, No. 7 July 2021 Tammuz-Av 5781 ShaloThe Journal of the Reading Jewish Communitym published by0 the Jewish7 Federation2 of Reading/Berks1 Your Federation Supports: Jewish Education Preschool, Federation build on success Food Pantry By Holli Winick Viau Since I started as incoming director of Friendship Circle the Lakin Preschool in April, I have been Chevra learning so much about our preschool families, our children, and how we can make Community Shabbat changes to enrich the preschool experience Reading Jewish Film Series for everyone involved. I have been greeting everyone at PJ Library the door so that I can become familiar with parents and caregivers, as well as Jewish Family Service having the children and parents become Jewish Cultural Center accustomed to seeing me each morning. I love being able to welcome every little Lakin Holocaust Library smiling face into the building each morning! We are working to upgrade our preschool & Resource Center and our enrichment programming as the Israel & Overseas school transitions to management by the Jewish Federation of Reading. We want to Camp Scholarships continue to provide rich and varied experiences for our children in a loving environment, while Israel Trips making it fun and promoting growth. We are Jewish Community working to offer a music class during school this year as a “special” class for each age High School group, as well as welcoming back a gross Holli Winick Viau has been working to get to know the Lakin Preschool children.
  • Terrorism and the Rise of Right-Wing Content in Israeli Books

    Terrorism and the Rise of Right-Wing Content in Israeli Books

    Terrorism and the Rise of Right-Wing Content in Israeli Books Supplementary Appendix Contents A Automated text analysis: Extracting data on political ideology in popular books 3 A.1 Textual sources . .3 A.2 Selection of books into the Google N-gram corpus . .4 A.3 Textual pre-processing of Hebrew words . .8 A.4 Generating a comprehensive dataset of political phrases in Israeli books . .9 A.5 Mapping phrases to the ideology of political parties . .9 A.6 Measuring phrases’ yearly frequency in Google N-gram . 10 A.7 Summary statistics . 13 B Empirical strategy and modeling choices 14 C Robustness tests 18 D Additional estimations 22 E Israeli civics textbook comparison 26 F Information on book publishers in Israel 31 1 List of Figures A1 OCR quality of Hebrew books with right and left-wing phrases . .5 A2 Phrases most strongly linked the ideology of political blocs . .7 A3 Stemming Hebrew Text . 12 A4 Residuals over time . 15 A5 Year-by-year correlation of the residuals . 16 A6 Placebo: Terrorism casualties from other countries . 19 A7 Topic Prevalence During the Intifadas vs. Not . 21 List of Tables A1 List of political parties by bloc . .6 A2 Summary Statistics . 13 A3 Placebo: Frequency of phrases by bloc and the number of casualties from other conflicts . 20 A4 Frequency of phrases by bloc after the peak of terrorism in the First Intifada 23 A5 Frequency of phrases by bloc and the number of casualties from Palestinian Violence (cumulative) . 24 A6 Frequency of phrases by bloc and the number of casualties from Palestinian violence (other estimations) .
  • The Representation of Women in Israeli Politics

    The Representation of Women in Israeli Politics

    10E hy is it important for women to be represented in the Perspective A Comparative Politics: in Israeli Women of Representation The WKnesset and in cabinet? Are women who are elected The Representation of to these institutions expected to do more to promote “female” interests than their male counterparts? What are the factors influencing the representation of women in Israeli politics? How Women in Israeli Politics has their representation changed over the years, and would the imposition of quotas be a good idea? A Comparative Perspective This policy paper examines the representation of women in Israeli politics from a comparative perspective. Its guiding premise is that women’s representation in politics, and particularly in legislative bodies, is of great importance in that it is tightly bound to liberal and democratic principles. According to some researchers, it is also important because female legislators Policy Paper 10E advance “female” issues more than male legislators do. While there has been a noticeable improvement in the representation of women in Israeli politics over the years, the situation in Israel is still fairly poor in this regard. This paper Assaf Shapira | Ofer Kenig | Chen Friedberg | looks at the impact of this situation on women’s status and Reut Itzkovitch-Malka gender equality in Israeli society, and offers recommendations for improving women’s representation in politics. The steps recommended are well-accepted in many democracies around the world, but have yet to be tried in Israel. Why is it important for women to be Assaf Shapira | Ofer Kenig | Chen Friedberg | Reut Itzkovitch-Malka Friedberg | Chen | Ofer Kenig Shapira Assaf This publication is an English translation of a policy paper represented in the Knesset and in cabinet? published in Hebrew in August 2013, which was produced by Are women who are elected to these the Israel Democracy Institute’s “Political Reform Project,” led by Prof.