<<

Chapter 3

Symplectic and Kaehler Geometry

Lecture 12 Today: Symplectic geometry and Kaehler geometry, the linear aspects anyway.

Symplectic Geometry Let V be an n dimensional over R, B : V V Ra bilineare form on V . × → Definition. B is alternating if B(v, w) = B(w, v). Denote by Alt2(V ) the space of all alternating bilinear forms on V . − Definition. Take any B Alt(V ), U a subspace of V . Then we can define the by ∈ U ⊥ = v V,B(u, v) = 0, u U { ∈ ∀ ∈ } Definition. B is non-degenerate if V ⊥ = 0 . { } Theorem. If B is non-degenerate then dim V is even. Moeover, there exists a e1, . . . , en, f1, . . . , fn of V such that B(ei, en) = B(fi, fj ) = 0 and B(ei, fj ) = δij

Definition. B is non-degenerate if and only if the pair (V,B) is a symplectic vector space. Then ei’s and fj ’s are called a Darboux basis of V . Let B be non-degenerate and U a vector subspace of V Remark: dim U ⊥ = 2n dim V and we have the following 3 scenarios. − 1. U isotropic U ⊥ U. This implies that dim U n ⇔ ⊃ ≤ 2. U Lagrangian U ⊥ = U. This implies dim U = n. ⇔ 3. U symplectic U ⊥ U = . This implies that U ⊥ is symplectic and B and B ⊥ are non-degenerate. ⇔ ∩ ∅ |U |U Let V = V m be a vector space over Rwe have

2 2 Alt (V ) ∼= Λ (V ∗) is a canonical identification. Let v1, . . . , vm be a basis of v, then

2 1 Alt (V ) B B(v , v )v∗ v∗ ∋ 7→ 2 i j i ∧ j 2 2 � and the inverse Λ (V ∗) ω B Alt (V ) is given by ∋ 7→ ω ∈ B(v, w) = iW (iV ω) Suppose m = 2n. 2 2 n Theorem. B Alt (V ) is non-degenerate if ω Λ (V ) satisfies ω = 0 ∈ B ∈ B 6 1/2 of Proof. B non-degenerate, let e1, . . . , fn be a Darboux basis of V then

ω = e∗ f ∗ B i ∧ j and we can show � n ω = n!e∗ f ∗ e∗ f ∗ = 0 B 1 ∧ 1 ∧ · · · ∧ n ∧ n 6

2 Notation. ω Λ (V ∗), symplectic geometers just say “B (v, w) = ω(v, w)”. ∈ ω Kaehler spaces V = V 2n , V a vector space over R, B Alt2(V ) is non-generate. Assume we have another piece of structure a map J : V V that is R-linear and∈ J 2 = I. → − Definition. B and J are compatible if B(v, w) = B(Jv, Jw). Exercise(not to be handed in) Let Q(v, w) = B(v, Jw) show that B and J are compatible if and only if Q is symmetric. From J we can make V a vector space over Cby setting √ 1v = Jv. So this gives V a structure of complex n-dimensional vector space. − Definition. Take the H : V V Cby × → 1 H(v, w) = (B(v, w) + √ 1Q(v, w)) √ 1 − − B and J are compatible if and only if H is hermitian on the complex vector space V . Note that H(v, v) = Q(v, v). Definition. V, J, B is Kahler if either H is positive definite or Q is positive definite (these two are equivalent).

Consider V ∗ C= HomR(V, C), so if l V ∗ Cthen l : V C. ⊗ ∈ ⊗ → 1,0 0,1 Definition. l (V ∗) if it is C-linear, i.e. l(Jv) = √ 1l(v). And l (V ∗) if it is C-antilinear, i.e. ∈ − ∈ l(Jv) = √ 1l(v). − − Definition. ¯lv = l(v). J ∗l(v) = lJ(v).

1,0 0,1 1,0 0,1 Then if l (V ∗) then ¯l (V ∗) . If l (V ∗) then J ∗l = √ 1l, l (V ∗) , J ∗l = √ 1l. ∈ ∈ 1,0∈ 0,1 − ∈ − − So we can decompose V ∗ C= (V ∗) (V ∗) i.e. decomposing into √ 1 eigenspace of J ∗ and 0,1 0,1 ⊗ ⊕ ± − (V ∗) = (V ∗) . r r This decomposition gives a decomposition of the , Λ (V ∗ C) = Λ (V ∗) C. Now, this ⊗ ⊗ decomposes into bigraded pieces r k,l Λ (V ∗ C) = Λ (V ∗) ⊗

k�+l=r k,l Λ (V ∗) is the linear span of k, l forms of the form

1,0 µ µ ν¯ ν¯ µ ν (V ∗) 1 ∧ · · · ∧ k ∧ 1 ∧ · · · ∧ l i j ∈ r r Note that J ∗ : V ∗ C V ∗ Ccan be extended to a map J ∗ : Λ (V ∗ C) Λ (V ∗ C) by setting ⊗ → ⊗ ⊗ → ⊗ J ∗(l l ) = J ∗l J ∗l 1 ∧ · · · ∧ r 1 ∧ · · · ∧ r r on decomposable elements l1 lr Λ . r We can define complex conjugation∧ · · · ∧ ∈ on Λ (V ∗ C) on decomposable elements ω = l l by ⊗ 1 ∧ · · · ∧ r ω¯ = l¯1 ¯lr. r r r k,l l,k Λ (∧V ∗ · · · ∧C ) = Λ (V ) C, then ω ¯ = ω if and only if ω Λ (V ∗) . And if ω Λ (V ∗) then ω ¯ Λ (V ∗) ⊗ ⊗ ∈ ∈ ∈ k,l k l Proposition. On Λ (V ∗) we have J ∗ = (√ 1) − Id. − 1,0 Proof. Take ω = µ µ ν¯ ν¯ , µ , ν (V ∗) then 1 ∧ · · · ∧ k ∧ 1 ∧ · · · ∧ l i i ∈ k l J ∗ω = J ∗µ J ∗µ J ∗ν¯ J ∗ν¯ = ( 1) ( √ 1) ω 1 ∧ · · · ∧ k ∧ 1 ∧ · · · ∧ l − − −

2 Notice that for the following decomposition of Λ (V C) the eigenvalues of J ∗ are given below ⊗ Λ2(V C) = Λ2,0 Λ1,1 Λ0,2 ⊗ ⊕ ⊕ ∗ 1 1 1 J − − ���� ���� ���� So if ω Λ∗(V ∗ C) then if Jω = ω. � �� � Now,∈ back to⊗ serious Kahler stuff. 2 2 Let V,B,J be Kahler. B ωB Λ (V ∗) Λ (V ∗) C. 7→ ∈ ⊂ ⊗ 1,1 B is J invariant, so ω is J-invariant, which happens if and only if ω Λ (V ∗) and ω is real if and B B ∈ B only if ω¯B = ωB . 2 1,1 So there is a -1 correspondence between J invariant elements of Λ (V ) and elements ω Λ (V ∗) which are real. ∈ 1,0 0,1 ρ 1,1 1,0 Observe: (V ∗) V ∗) Λ (V ∗) by µ ν µ ν. Let µ , . . . , µ be a basis of (V ∗) . Take ⊗ −→ ⊗ 7→ ∧ 1 n

1,0 0,1 α = a µ µ¯ (V ∗) (V ∗) ij i ⊗ j ∈ ⊗ � Take ρ(α) = a µ µ¯ ij i ∧ j � 1 is it true that ρ(α) = ρ(α). No, not always. This happens if a = a , equivalently [a ] is Hermitian. ij − ij √ 1 ij We have − 2 1,1 Alt (V ) B ω = ω Λ (V ∗) ∋ 7→ B ∈ 1 1 Take α = ρ− (ω), H = √ 1 α. Then H is Hermitian. 1 − √ Check that H = √ 1 (B + 1Q), B Kahler iff and only if H is positive definite. − −

6