Works by Herbert Butterfield, Unless Otherwise Stated

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Works by Herbert Butterfield, Unless Otherwise Stated Notes Note: All references are to works by Herbert Butterfield, unless otherwise stated. Introduction 1. 'Paul Vellacott: Master of Peterhouse, 1939-1954', The Sex 114 Oune 1956), 1-4. For Vellacott's style, see his 'The Diary of a Country Gentleman in 1688', CHJ 2 (1926-28), 48-62. 2. 'George Peabody Gooch', The Contemporary Review 200 (1961), 501-5, esp. 502. Cf. Frank Eyck, G. P. Gooch: A Study in History and Politics (1982), esp. pp. 311-405; John D. Fair, Harold Temperley: A Scholar and Romantic in the Public Realm (1992), esp. pp. 167-215; SMH, pp. 4-6; and 'Harold Temperley and George Canning', in H. W. V. Temperley, The Foreign Policy of Canning 1822-1827 (1966), p. viii. 3. C. Thomas Mcintire, 'Introduction Herbert Butterfield on Christianity and History', WCH, pp. xxiv-xxv. 4. SM, pp. 40, 45, 71-2, review of Symondson, EHR 87 (1972), 644; and DHI I, p. 403. Cf. C. Thomas Mcintire, 'Introduction Herbert Butterfield on Christianity and History', WCH, pp. xxv-xxvi. 5. 'Early Youth', BP, 7. Cf. Adolf Harnack, Christianity and History (1898); What is Christianity? (1901). 6. John L. Clive, 'The Prying Yorkshireman', New Republic 186 (23 June 1982), 31. 7. EH, pp. 88-90; GNP, pp. 196-206; and GH, pp. 220-4. 8. ' History as the Organisation of Man's Memory', in Knowledge Among Men, ed. Paul H. Oehser, (1966), p. 31. 9. For Butterfield on his writings, see 'My Literary Productions', BP, 269/3. 10. Review of Carr, CR 83 (2 December 1961), 172. 11. CH, pp. 19f. Cf. review of Widgery, The Sunday Times (16 July 1960), 27. 12. Cf. C. Thomas Mcintire, 'Introduction Herbert Butterfield on Christianity and History', WCH (1979), pp. xlv-xlvi; and S. W. Sykes, 'Theology through History', in David F. Ford (ed.), The Modem Theologians: An Introduction to Christian Theology in the Twentieth Century (1989) II, pp. 25-7. 13. Adam Watson, 'Introduction', OH (1981), p. 7. 14. WIH, p. vi. 15. The Present State of Historical Scholarship (1965), p. 4; and 'Some Trends in Scholarship 1868-1968, in the Field of Modem History', TRHS Fifth Series 19 (1969), 177. 16. W. H. Walsh, An Introduction to Philosophy of History (1967), pp. 11-17. 17. Ernst Troeltsch, Der Historismus und seine Probleme (1922). Troeltsch offered his resolution as 'Ethics and the Philosophy of History', in Christian Thought: Its History and Application, ed. F. von Hugel (1923), pp. 39-129. 18. WIH, pp. 109-32. 19. HHR, pp. 101-30; and 'Moral Judgements in History' (1965), esp. p. 11. 20. See John L. Herkless, 'Meinecke and the Ranke-Burckhardt Problem', HT 9 (1970), 290-321. 217 218 Notes 21. See esp. Alfred J. Ayer, Language, Truth and Logic (1936). 22. In the Journal of Philosophy 39 (1942), 35-48, extensively reprinted. 23. So terrp.ed by William Dray, Laws and Explanation in History (1957), pp. 1, 18. 24. William H. Walsh, 'Colligatory Concepts in History', in Studies in the Nature and Teaching of History, ed. W. H. Burston and David Thompson (1967), pp. 65-106. 25. Sidney Hook, ed., Philosophy and History (1963); H.-G. Gadamer, Truth and Method (1965); Haskell Fain, Between Philosophy and History (1970); Hayden V. White, Metahistory (1973); and Peter Munz, The Shapes of Time (1977). 26. The discussion is recorded in Scientific Change, ed. Alastair C. Crombie (1963), pp. 370-95. 27. See David Bebbington, Patterns in History (1979), pp. 145-53. Cf. William H. Walsh, An Introduction to Philosophy of History (1967), pp. 42-7, 73-92; Patrick Gardiner, The Nature of Historical Explanation (1952), pp. 32-4; and G. H. von Wright, Explanation and Understanding (1971), esp. pp. 1-33. 28. Leopold von Ranke's famous statement appears in his 1824 'Preface' to his Geschichten der Romanischen und Germanischen VOlker von 1494 bis 1514. G. G. Iggers, 'The Image of Ranke in German and American Historical Thought', HT 2 (1962), 17-40, demonstrates that Ranke should not be read as a crude empiricist. 29. John B. Bury, The Science ofHistory (1903), pp. 18-19, cf. pp. 7, 42. For Bury's modifications of this view, see 'Cleopatra's Nose', Rationalist Philosophical Annual (1916), 16-23; and 'A Letter on the Writing of History' CHJ 2 (1927), 196-7. Cf. CH, p. 110; GIH, p. 111. 30. See Harvey J. Kaye, The British Marxist Historians (1984), for Dawson, Eternity in Time, ed. Stratford Caldecott and John Morrill, (1997). 31. John Kenyon, The History Men (1983), pp. 242-50. 32. For critical assessments of Toynbee, see Toynbee and History, ed. M. F. Ashley Montagu (1956). 33. Owen Chadwick, 'Sir Herbert Butterfield', CR 101 (16 November 1979), 7. 34. HHR, p. 141; 'Universal History and the Comparative Study of Civilization', in Sir Herbert Butterfield, Cho Yun Hsu and William H. McNeill on Chinese and World History, ed. N. H. Fehl (1971), p. 23. 35. EH, pp. 133-6; HHR, p. 102. 36. Review of Carr, CR 83 (2 December 1961), 172. 37. John L. Clive, 'The Prying Yorkshireman', New Republic 186 (23 June 1982), 35. 38. Esmond Wright, 'Professor Sir Herbert Butterfield', Contemporary Review 235 (December 1979), 293. 39. P. G. Lucas, review of MHP, Universities Quarterly 10 (1956), 188. 40. E. H. Carr, What is History? (1961), p. 69. 41. Karl Li:iwith, 'History and Christianity', in Reinhold Niebuhr: His Religious, Social and Political Thought, ed. C. W. Kegley and R. W. Bretall (1956), p. 290. 42. Hugh F. Kearney, review of CH, The Month Third Series 3 (1950), 145. 43. W. Stanford Reid, 'Professor Butterfield and a Christian Interpretation of History', His 16 (May 1956), 23-5. 44. Adam Watson, 'Introduction', to OH, p. 7. 45. Ibid., p. 8. For a much more critical discussion see George Watson, 'The War against the Whigs', Encounter New Series 1 (1986), 19-25. Notes 219 46. Esmond Wright, 'Professor Sir Herbert Butterfield', Contemporary Review 235 (1979), 294. 47. John L. Clive, 'The Prying Yorkshireman', New Republic 186 (23 June 1982), 32. 48. Michael Hobart, 'History and Religion in the Thought of Herbert Butterfield', JHI 32 (1971), 543. 49. W. R. Matthews, 'The Philosophy of History', review of CH, Journal of Education 82 (1950), 354. SO. W. A. Speck, 'Herbert Butterfield and the Legacy of a Christian Historian', in A Christian View of History? eds. George Marsden and Frank Roberts (1975), p. lOS. 51. H. P. Rickman, 'The Horizons of History', Hibbert Journal 56 (1956--7), 168. 52. William A. Speck, 'Herbert Butterfield on the Christian and Historical Study', FH 4 (1971), 64. 53. W. Stanford Reid, 'The Problem of the Christian Interpretation of History', FH S (1973), 102. 54. Louis J. Voskuil, 'History: Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing?' Pro Rege (March 1988), 6. SS. Martin Wight, 'History and Judgment: Butterfield, Niebuhr, and the Technical Historian', The Frontier (August 1950), 301-14; 'History's Theme', Observer (23 October 1949), 7; and 'The Tragedy of History', The Observer (2 September 1951), 7. 56. Ernst Nagel, 'History of History', review of MHP, Nation 182 (3 March 1956), 184. 57. C. Thomas Mcintire, 'Introduction Herbert Butterfield on Christianity and History', WCH, p. xxxix; cf. pp. l-li and xlix-l. 58. Kenneth W. Thompson, 'Butterfield, Herbert', International Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences. XVIII (1979), p. 95. 59. Harold T. Parker, 'Herbert Butterfield', in Some 20th Century Historians, ed. S. W. Halperin (1961), p. 100; cf. pp. 94-7. 60. For example, David Knowles, 'St Augustine', DH, p. 19; and Kenneth W. Thompson, 'Butterfield, Herbert', in The International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. XVIII (1979), p. 91. 61. Denis Brogan, 'Sir Herbert Butterfield as a Historian: An Appreciation', DH, pp. 3-7. 62. Michael Hobart, 'History and Religion in the Thought of Herbert Butterfield', JHI 32 (1971), 552-3. 63. Kenneth W. Thompson, 'Butterfield, Herbert', in The International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. XVIII (1979), pp. 94-S. 64. Butterfield wrote of a 'Namier School' without naming its membership. The term included Romney Sedgwick and John Brooke, probably also Lucy Sutherland and Betty Kemp, and possibly Ian R. Christie. 65. On different categories of evidence, see Richard Pares, 'Round the Georgian Mulberry Bush', review of GH, The New Statesman 54 (23 November 1957), 698. For discussions of Butterfield's critique of Namier, see M. S. Anderson, Historians and Eighteenth-Century Europe 1715-1789 (1979), pp. 221-9; and John Kenyon, The History Men (1983), pp. 261-9. For Butterfield, see W. R. Fryer, 'English Politics in the Age of Burke: Herbert Butterfield's Achievement', Studies in Burke and His Time 11 (1970), 1519-42, and on the 220 Notes Namier side, Ian R. Christie, 'George III and the Historians-Thirty Years On', H 71 (1986), 205-21. 66. OMS, pp. 1, 5, 30, 41. 67. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Copernican Revolution (1957), esp. p. 283; cf. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (rev. edn 1970), p. 85. 68. A. Rupert Hall, 'On Whiggism', History of Science 21 (1983), 45-59; Adrian Wilson and T. G. Ashplant, 'Whig History and Present-centred History', HJ 31 (1988), 1-16; Ernst Mayr, 'When is Historiography Whiggish?' [HI 51 (1990), 301-9; Andrew Cunningham and Perry Williams, 'De-centring the "Big Picture": The Origins of Modem Science and the Modern Origins of Science', British Journal for the History of Science 26 (1993), 407-32; and Regis Cabral, 'Herbert Butterfield (1900-1979) as a Christian Historian of Science', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 27 (1996), 547-64. 69. Kenneth W. Thompson, 'Butterfield, Herbert', The International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences: XVIII (1979), p. 93. 70. Maurice Cowling, 'Herbert Butterfield 1900--1979', PBA 65 (1979), 609.
Recommended publications
  • Herbert Butterfield and the Interpretation of History (Book Review)
    Volume 34 Number 3 Article 5 March 2006 Herbert Butterfield and the Interpretation of History (Book Review) Harry Van Dyke Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/pro_rege Recommended Citation Van Dyke, Harry (2006) "Herbert Butterfield and the Interpretation of History (Book Review)," Pro Rege: Vol. 34: No. 3, 29 - 31. Available at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/pro_rege/vol34/iss3/5 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at Digital Collections @ Dordt. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pro Rege by an authorized administrator of Digital Collections @ Dordt. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Herbert Butterfield and the Interpretation of History by Keith C. Sewell (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005) 280 pp., including bibliographies and an index. ISBN 1-4039-3928-4. $74.95. Reviewed by Harry Van Dyke, Professor of History Emeritus, Redeemer University College. Professor Keith Sewell’s bulky doctoral dissertation, prised by this conclusion? Long before the Sociology of now packaged in a manageable and attractive book of 12 Knowledge became a household word, Abraham Kuyper, lucid chapters, is an important study of a body of litera- in the great parliamentary debates of 1904, defended ture that must be considered intensely relevant for critical the inescapability of subjective interpretation and there- reflection on two areas of academic work: the science of fore the perfect validity of worldview-directed university history and the humanities in general. The book exam- studies, such as those given at the Free University, against ines successive stages in the development of the thought the charge by Leyden professor Van der Vlugt that such of Butterfield in relation to fundamental issues in the his- studies were unacceptably “sectarian.” And decades be- torical discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Abbey
    Westminster Abbey THE DEDICATION OF A MEMORIAL TO OWEN CHADWICK OM KBE 20th May 1916–17th July 2015 and HENRY CHADWICK KBE 23rd June 1920–17th June 2008 Thursday 1st February 2018 6 pm Owen Chadwick OM KBE Master of Selwyn College, Cambridge(1956–83) Fellow (1983–2015) Fellow of Trinity Hall, Cambridge (1947–56) Chaplain (1947–56) Dean of Chapel (1949–56) Honorary Fellow (1959–2015) Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History (1958–68) Regius Professor Modern History (1968–83) Vice-Chancellor (1969–71) 2 Henry Chadwick KBE Dean of Christ Church (1969–79) Regius Professor of Divinity and Canon of Christ Church, Oxford (1959–69) Regius Professor of Divinity, Cambridge (1979–83) Master of Peterhouse, Cambridge (1987–93) Fellow of Magdalene College, Cambridge (1979–87) Fellow, Chaplain, and Dean, Queens’ College, Cambridge (1946–58) Pro-Vice Chancellor, Oxford University (1974–75) Member of the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Committee (1969–81, 1983–90) 3 O R D E R O F S E R V I C E The Very Reverend Dr John Hall, Dean of Westminster, gives THE BIDDING E assemble to give thanks to almighty God for two W brothers whose unparalleled contribution in the 20th century to the study of theology and the history of the Church was enlivened by a deep devotion, a vital Christian faith, and a powerful commitment to the academic life in the two ancient universities, and whose collective impact in Church and academy was extraordinarily wide. This south Quire aisle of the Abbey holds many memorials, including those to William Tyndale, Henry Francis Lyte, Isaac Watts, and the brothers John and Charles Wesley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wesleyan Enlightenment
    The Wesleyan Enlightenment: Closing the gap between heart religion and reason in Eighteenth Century England by Timothy Wayne Holgerson B.M.E., Oral Roberts University, 1984 M.M.E., Wichita State University, 1986 M.A., Asbury Theological Seminary, 1999 M.A., Kansas State University, 2011 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Abstract John Wesley (1703-1791) was an Anglican priest who became the leader of Wesleyan Methodism, a renewal movement within the Church of England that began in the late 1730s. Although Wesley was not isolated from his enlightened age, historians of the Enlightenment and theologians of John Wesley have only recently begun to consider Wesley in the historical context of the Enlightenment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex relationship between a man, John Wesley, and an intellectual movement, the Enlightenment. As a comparative history, this study will analyze the juxtaposition of two historiographies, Wesley studies and Enlightenment studies. Surprisingly, Wesley scholars did not study John Wesley as an important theologian until the mid-1960s. Moreover, because social historians in the 1970s began to explore the unique ways people experienced the Enlightenment in different local, regional and national contexts, the plausibility of an English Enlightenment emerged for the first time in the early 1980s. As a result, in the late 1980s, scholars began to integrate the study of John Wesley and the Enlightenment. In other words, historians and theologians began to consider Wesley as a serious thinker in the context of an English Enlightenment that was not hostile to Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Hume and America Donald Livingston Northern Illinois University
    The Kentucky Review Volume 4 | Number 3 Article 3 Spring 1983 Hume and America Donald Livingston Northern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review Part of the Philosophy Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Livingston, Donald (1983) "Hume and America," The Kentucky Review: Vol. 4 : No. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review/vol4/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Kentucky Libraries at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kentucky Review by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hume and America Donald Livingston Of all men that distinguish themselves by memorable achievements, the first place of honour seems due to Legislators and founders of states, who transmit a system of laws and institutions to secure the peace, happiness, and liberty of future generations. -DavidHume Modern philosophy began in the seventeenth century as a reflection on the epistemological and metaphysical problems to which the new science of mathematical physics gave rise. But by the eighteenth century attention began to shift away from man as a knower of nature to man as a maker of and as an agent in civil society. By the end of the century the scientific study of social and political order was well advanced. The American Constitution was ratified in 1789 at the high tide of the Enlightenment, and the framers were and saw themselves to be thinkers who were applying the theoretical results of social and political philosophy to the practical problems of fixing the proper limits of liberty, authority, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.Thc sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Pagc(s}". If it was possible to obtain the missing pagc(s) or section, they arc spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed cither blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame* If copyrighted materials were deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • History 329 the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, 1500-PRESENT
    History 330 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Spring 2021 THE PAPACY IN HISTORY Meetings: online, asynchronous Instructor: Professor Neal Pease Office Hours: Virtual: contact by email, as and when needed E-mail: [email protected] Final Exam: F May 21, deadline for turn in 5:30 pm E-mail Classlist: [email protected] Course Description This course will survey the history of the papacy, the world’s most visible and influential religious office, from its origins to the present day. The course will examine the place of the papacy within the belief system and organization of the Catholic Church, and in the wider world. The course will naturally emphasize developments in Europe, the historical homeland of Catholicism, but will also examine the impact of the papacy in other regions of the globe. Not open to students with cr in Hist 600 with same topic. Prereq: jr st; satisfaction of GER English Composition competency req. Topics to be covered will include, among others • The beginnings of the papacy • The Medieval papacy • The papacy and the era of reformation • The papacy in the modern era Requirements 1. Attentive study of weekly annotated PowerPoint lecture presentations posted on course Canvas site and completion of reading/viewing assignments. 2. Two essays, each 7 -10 pages long, on one of the suggested essay topics handed out two weeks before the due date, or a review of any book listed as “recommended reading” in the syllabus (not required course readings, or reference works). Papers are due F Feb 26 and F Apr 9. Papers turned in late will be penalized in grading unless the student asks for, and expressly receives, an extension in advance of the due date.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Mediation) Regulations, 2005
    Register of Insurance & Reinsurance Intermediaries European Communities (Insurance Mediation) Regulations, 2005 Insurance Mediation Register: A list of Insurance & Reinsurance Intermediaries registered under the European Communities (Insurance Mediation) Regulations, 2005 (as amended). Registration of insurance/reinsurance intermediaries by the Central Bank of Ireland, does not of itself make the Central Bank of Ireland liable for any financial loss incurred by a person because the intermediary, any of its officers, employees or agents has contravened or failed to comply with a provision of these regulations, or any condition of the intermediary’s registration, or because the intermediary has become subject to an insolvency process. Ref No. Intermediary Registered As Registered on Tied to* Persons Responsible** Passporting Into C29473 123 Money Limited Insurance Intermediary 23 May 2006 Holmes Alan France t/a 123.ie,123.co.uk Paul Kierans Germany 3rd Floor Spain Mountain View United Kingdom Central Park Leopardstown Dublin 18 C31481 A Better Choice Ltd Insurance Intermediary 31 May 2007 Sean McCarthy t/a ERA Downey McCarthy, ERA Mortgages, Remortgages Direct 8 South Mall Cork C6345 A Callanan & Co Insurance Intermediary 31 July 2007 5 Lower Main Street Dundrum Dublin 14 C70109 A Plus Financial Services Limited Insurance Intermediary 18 January 2011 Paul Quigley United Kingdom 4 Rathvale Park Ayrfield Dublin 13 C1400 A R Brassington & Company Insurance Intermediary 31 May 2006 Cathal O'brien United Kingdom Limited t/a Brassington Insurance, Quickcover IFG House Booterstown Hall Booterstown Co Dublin C42521 A. Cleary & Sons Ltd Insurance Intermediary 30 March 2006 Deirdre Cleary Kiltimagh Enda Cleary Co. Mayo Helen Cleary Paul Cleary Brian Joyce Run Date: 07 August 2014 Page 1 of 398 Ref No.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast Error: How to Predict an Election: Part 1: Polls
    FORECAST ERROR: HOW TO PREDICT AN ELECTION: PART 1: POLLS "Any attempt to predict the future depends on it resembling the past"[0423l] Cartoon from the Daily Mirror, May 27 1970, as reproduced in “The British General Election of 1970”, Butler and Pinto‐Duschinsky. 1971; ISBN: 978‐1‐349‐01095‐0 1. INTRODUCTION The "Forecast Error" series of articles started examining election predictors in 2015. Each article considered many predictors, but each article covered just one election. This article marks a new chapter in the "Forecast Error" series where we examine an individual class of predictor more closely across many elections. We begin with possibly the most prominent: opinion polls. A political opinion poll is a method of assessing a population’s opinion on the matters of the day by asking a sample of people. A subset is the voter intention poll, which asks each sampled person how they intend to vote in an election. Pollsters then turn their intention into votes by applying certain assumptions. Those assumptions may not be valid over the long term, or even from one election to the next. The problem faced when writing about opinion polls is not how to start writing, it's how to stop. It is entirely possible to write a full article about any given facet of opinion polling, and examples immediately spring to mind: whether one should still use "margin of error" for online panel polling, Nate Silver's insight regarding the borrowing of strength from polls in similar states, is it meaningful to speak of a polling threshold, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Abuse of Cambridge University's Ten-Year Divinity Statute
    Ambition, Anxiety and Aspiration: the use and abuse of Cambridge University’s Ten-Year Divinity Statute. This paper examines the market for and motivation of those who made use of a little-known Cambridge University statute which, in effect, offered a low-cost distance learning degree until 1858. It shows how non-graduates, both clerical and lay, attempted to use its provisions to enhance their status, facilitate career advancement and insulate themselves against status slippage, a problem that became acute in the second decade of the nineteenth century as the reinvigorated universities reasserted their role as educators of the clergy and as the bishops increasingly denied ordination to those educated outside their sphere. In doing so we can observe how the desires of non-graduate clergy to take degrees, and the attempts of liberally-educated non-graduates to enter the pulpits of the established Church, were responded to both by the university which received them and more broadly by the print discourse which critiqued their ambitions. The tensions revealed are relevant not just for understanding something of how the clergy were developing as an occupational group, and the tensions caused by the changing supplies of graduates, but also reflect more generally the status anxieties of the elites and middling sorts as they faced down fears of competition for cultural and economic privilege appendant to educational opportunities. The ten-year divinity statute: interpretation and reputation. Distance learning has a long pedigree at Cambridge University. A papal dispensation allowing monks and friars to proceed to the degree of bachelor of divinity, without first taking a degree in the arts was, in spirit, to survive the reformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Honour's Role in the International States' System
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 31 Number 2 Winter Article 2 April 2020 Honour's Role in the International States' System Allen Z. Hertz Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Allen Z. Hertz, Honour's Role in the International States' System, 31 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 113 (2002). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. HONOUR'S ROLE IN THE INTERNATIONAL STATES' SYSTEM* ALLEN Z. HERTZ* INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Studying the First World War's origins, James Joll (1918-1994), Professor of International History at the University of London, offered this insight: "In the late 20th century we perhaps find it easier to conceive of foreign policy as being motivated by domestic preoccupations and by economic interests than by... considerations of prestige and glory. It does not necessarily follow that the men of 1914 thought in the same way as we do."' To recapture that age which ended during the First World War, this essay analyzes the meaning of "honour" as a staple of European political philosophy. The significance of the "word of honour" is then located in the context of European courtly society, where a king's honour is explored in relation to that of his country and in the "international of kings" that was the European States' system until 1917-18.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing British National History in the Twentieth Century
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Writing British national history in the twentieth century Salinsky, Mary Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 This electronic theses or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Title: Writing British national history in the twentieth century Author: Mary Salinsky The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement.
    [Show full text]