United Nations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United Nations UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-14-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 3 March 2000 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of The Former Yugoslavia since 1991 English Original: French IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge Claude Jorda, Presiding Judge Almiro Rodrigues Judge Mohamed Shahabuddeen Registrar: Mrs. Dorothee de Sampayo Garrido-Nijgh Decision of: 3 March 2000 THE PROSECUTOR v. TIHOMIR BLA[KI] JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Defence Counsel: Mr. Mark Harmon Mr. Anto Nobilo Mr. Andrew Cayley Mr. Russell Hayman Mr. Gregory Kehoe Case no.: IT-95-14-T PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/e1ae55/3 March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNEX...................................................................................................................................vii I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 A. The Tribunal...................................................................................................................1 B. The Indictment...............................................................................................................1 1. The general context and form of responsibility incurred...........................................2 2. The crimes charged....................................................................................................4 a) Persecution............................................................................................................4 b) Unlawful attacks upon civilians and civilian objects...........................................4 c) Wilful killing and serious bodily injury................................................................5 d) Destruction and plunder of property.....................................................................5 e) Destruction of institutions dedicated to religion or education..............................5 f) Inhumane treatment, taking of hostages and use of human shields......................6 C. The main stages of the proceedings...............................................................................6 1. Issues relating to the composition of the Trial Chamber...........................................7 2. Issues relating to the detention of the accused...........................................................8 a) Motions for modification to the detention conditions of the accused ..................8 b) Motions for provisional release of the accused ....................................................9 3. Issues relating to evidence .........................................................................................9 a) Disclosure obligations..........................................................................................9 b) The exception to the disclosure obligation set down in Rule 70 of the Rules....11 c) The admissibility of the evidence.......................................................................13 d) Access to the confidential documents in related La{va Valley cases.................14 e) Orders for production of documents...................................................................16 i) Proceedings regarding the Republic of Croatia.........................................16 ii) Other proceedings .....................................................................................18 4. Issues relating to the appearance and protection of victims and witnesses .............19 5. Issues relating to the length of proceedings.............................................................20 6. The issue of the dismissal of some counts following the presentation of Prosecution evidence...................................................................................................................21 7. The summoning of Trial Chamber witnesses pursuant to Rule 98 of the Rules......22 8. The procedure for determining the sentence............................................................23 II. APPLICABLE LAW........................................................................................................24 A. The requirement that there be an armed conflict .........................................................24 1. Definition.................................................................................................................24 2. Role..........................................................................................................................25 a) A condition for charging under Articles 2 and 3 of the Statute..........................25 b) A condition for jurisdiction under Article 5 of the Statute.................................25 3. Nexus between the crimes imputed to the accused and the armed conflict.............26 B. Article 2 of the Statute: Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions..........................27 a) International nature of the armed conflict..........................................................28 i) Direct intervention.....................................................................................30 ii) Indirect intervention..................................................................................34 b) Protected persons and property...........................................................................44 i) The “nationality” of the victims................................................................44 ii) Co-belligerent States.................................................................................47 a. Co-belligerence.....................................................................................47 b. Reasoning of Article 4 of the Fourth Geneva Convention...................49 iii) Prisoners of war.........................................................................................50 iv) Protected property.....................................................................................51 Case no.: IT-95-14-T i PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/e1ae55/3 March 2000 c) The elements of the grave breaches....................................................................51 i) Article 2(a) – wilful killing (count 5)........................................................52 ii) Article 2(b) – inhuman treatment (counts 15 and 19)...............................52 iii) Article 2(c) – wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health (count 8)..........................................................................................53 iv) Article 2(d) – extensive destruction of property (count 11).....................53 v) Article 2(h) – taking civilians as hostages (count 17)...............................53 C. Article 3 of the Statute – Violations of the Laws or Customs of War.........................54 a) Scope and conditions of applicability of Article 3 of the Statute.......................54 i) Customary international law and conventional law..................................55 ii) Individual criminal responsibility .............................................................58 iii) Protected persons (Common Article 3).....................................................59 b) The elements of the offences..............................................................................59 i) Unlawful attack against civilians (count 3); attack upon civilian property (count 4) ....................................................................................................59 ii) Murder (count 6) .......................................................................................60 iii) Violence to life and person (count 9)........................................................60 iv) Devastation of property (count 12) ...........................................................60 v) Plunder of public or private property (count 13).......................................60 vi) Destruction or wilful damage to institutions dedicated to religion or education (count 14)..................................................................................61 vii) Cruel treatment (count 16 and 20).............................................................61 viii) Taking of hostages (count 18)...................................................................61 D. Article 5 of the Statute: crimes against humanity........................................................62 1. The Arguments of the Parties..................................................................................63 a) The Prosecution ..................................................................................................63 b) The Defence........................................................................................................64 2. Discussion and conclusions .....................................................................................65 a) The legal and factual elements...........................................................................65 i) The material element.................................................................................66 a. The widespread or systematic attack against any civilian population..66 i. A widespread or systematic attack................................................66 ii. A civilian population.....................................................................70 b. The sub-characterisations.....................................................................73 i. Murder...........................................................................................73 ii.
Recommended publications
  • Prosecutor V. Dario Kordić and Mario Čerkez, Case No
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-14/2-A Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 17 December 2004 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Wolfgang Schomburg, Presiding Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Judge Mehmet Güney Judge Inés Mónica Weinberg de Roca Registrar: Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 17 December 2004 PROSECUTOR v. DARIO KORDI] AND MARIO ^ERKEZ JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Norman Farrell Ms. Helen Brady Ms. Marie-Ursula Kind and Ms. Michelle Jarvis Counsel for Dario Kordić: Mr. Mitko Naumovski, Mr. Turner T. Smith, Jr. and Mr. Stephen M. Sayers Counsel for Mario Čerkez: Mr. Božidar Kovačić and Mr. Goran Mikuličić Case No.: IT-95-14/2-A 17 December 2004 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. THE ACCUSED..............................................................................................................................1 1. Dario Kordić ............................................................................................................................1 2. Mario Čerkez............................................................................................................................1 B. THE TRIAL JUDGEMENT ...............................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Kordić and Čerkez?
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-14/2-A Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 17 December 2004 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Wolfgang Schomburg, Presiding Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Judge Mehmet Güney Judge Inés Mónica Weinberg de Roca Registrar: Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 17 December 2004 PROSECUTOR v. DARIO KORDI] AND MARIO ^ERKEZ JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Norman Farrell Ms. Helen Brady Ms. Marie-Ursula Kind and Ms. Michelle Jarvis Counsel for Dario Kordić: Mr. Mitko Naumovski, Mr. Turner T. Smith, Jr. and Mr. Stephen M. Sayers Counsel for Mario Čerkez: Mr. Božidar Kovačić and Mr. Goran Mikuličić Case No.: IT-95-14/2-APURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/738211/ 17 December 2004 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. THE ACCUSED..............................................................................................................................1 1. Dario Kordić ............................................................................................................................1 2. Mario Čerkez............................................................................................................................1 B. THE TRIAL JUDGEMENT ...............................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • 4418.Pdf (2935 Кбайт)
    The Muslim-Croat Civil War in Central Bosnia Number Twenty-three: Eastern European Studies Stjepan Mesˇtrovi´c, General Editor Series Board Norman Cigar Bronislaw Misztal Sabrina Ramet Vladimir Shlapentokh Keith Tester Charles R. Shrader The Muslim-Croat Civil War in Central Bosnia A Military History, 1992–1994 Texas A&M University Press College Station Copyright © 2003 by Charles R. Shrader Manufactured in the United States of America All rights reserved First edition The paper used in this book meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1984. Binding materials have been chosen for durability. o Shrader, Charles R. The Muslim-Croat civil war in Central Bosnia : a military history, 1992–1994 / Charles R. Shrader.—1st ed. p. cm.—(Eastern European studies ; no. 23) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58544-261-5 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Yugoslav War, 1991–1995—Campaigns—Bosnia and Herze- govina. 2. Bosnia and Herzegovina—History, Military. I. Title. II. Eastern European studies (College Station, Tex.) ; no. 23. DR1313.3 .S54 2003 949.703—dc21 2002153967 Excerpt from Rebecca West, Black Lamb and Grey Falcon: The Record of a Journey through Yugoslavia in 1937, courtesy Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London, 1946. To those who suffered English persons, therefore, of humanitarian and reformist disposition constantly went out to the Balkan Peninsula to see who was in fact ill-treating whom, and, being by the very nature of their perfectionist faith unable to accept the horrid hypothesis that everybody was ill-treating everybody else, all came back with a pet Balkan people established in their hearts as suffering and innocent, eternally the massacree and never the massacrer.
    [Show full text]