DOCSLIB.ORG

Luu-Ban-Nhap-Tu-Dong-8-3.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Luu-Ban-Nhap-Tu-Dong-8-3.Pdf COMMERCIAL LAW AND COMMERCIAL PRACTICE This edited collection brings together leading scholars and practitioners from various jurisdictions with chapters and commentaries coordinated around the theme of alignments and misalignments between commercial law and commercial practice. The purpose of the book is to prompt a more critical and constructive reassessment of current commercial law and its practices, and to instigate a more fruitful dialogue between academics, judges, law reformers and practitioners. The result is a series of provocative and challenging essays addressing an enormous range of problems that are of intimate concern to commercial practice. Some essays focus on broad themes, such as globalisation and trust. Others address more specific issues, such as contract interpretation or constraining modern management. Yet another group targets special prob- lems, such as dematerialisation or super-priority, in order to assess the suc- cess of commercial law in meeting commercial demands. The depth and breadth of issues addressed is a credit to the authors. Taken as a whole, the volume makes some pointed suggestions for improving the practices and processes, and indeed the future progress, of commercial law. Commercial Law and Commercial Practice Edited by SARAH WORTHINGTON Professor of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science OXFORD AND PORTLAND OREGON 2003 Published in North America (US and Canada) by Hart Publishing c/o International Specialized Book Services 5804 NE Hassalo Street Portland, Oregon 97213-3644 USA © The editor and contributors severally 2003 The Editor and Contributors have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, to be identified as the authors of this work. Hart Publishing is a specialist legal publisher based in Oxford, England. To order further copies of this book or to request a list of other publications please write to: Hart Publishing, Salters Boatyard, Folly Bridge, Abingdon Rd, Oxford, OX1 4LB Telephone: +44 (0)1865 245533 Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794882 email: mail@hartpub.co.uk WEBSITE: http//:www.hartpub.co.uk British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data Available ISBN 1-84113-438-4 (hardback) Typeset by Olympus Infotech Pvt. Ltd., India, in Sabon 10/12pt Printed and bound in Great Britain by Biddles Ltd, www.biddles.co.uk Contents Contributors ix Introduction: Aligning Commercial Law and Commercial Practice xi Sarah Worthington Part 1: General Pressures for Change 1. Globalisation: Its Historical Context 3 Ross Cranston, QC MP Commentary: Catherine Newman, QC 2. Commercial Notions and Equitable Potions 29 Sir John Mummery Commentary: Philip Wood 3. Statutory Ingredients in Common Law Change: Issues in the Development of Agency Doctrine 57 Deborah A DeMott 4. Property, Private Government and the Myth of Deregulation 85 Paddy Ireland Commentary: Andrew Whittaker Part 2: Contract Terms and their Interpretation 5. The Intractable Problem of the Interpretation of Legal Texts 123 Johan Steyn 6. The Interpretation of Contracts: Lord Hoffmann’s Re-Statement 139 Ewan McKendrick 7. The Uses of Ambiguity in Commercial Contracts: On Facilitating Re-Bargaining 163 William T Allen and Galya Levy Commentary: Paul Lomas 8. Objectivity and Committed Contextualism in Interpretation 189 Hugh Collins vi Contents Part 3: Adapting Commercial Law to Modern Conditions 9. Documents and Contractual Congruence in International Trade 213 Michael Bridge Commentary: William Blair, QC 10. The Dematerialisation of Money Market Instruments 249 Joanna Benjamin Commentary: Guy Morton 11. Material Adverse Change Clauses After 9/11 305 Richard Hooley 12. Re-thinking Insurable Interest 335 John Lowry and Philip Rawlings Commentary: Sir Jonathan Mance and Adrian Hamilton, QC 13. The Challenge of Modern Bankruptcy Policy: The Judicial Response 373 David Milman Part 4: Commercial Terms for Commercial Ends 14. Damages for Breach of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses 403 Nik Yeo and Daniel Tan 15. Interpreting Employment Contracts: Judges, Employers and Workers 433 Simon Deakin 16. Super Priority for Asset Acquisition Financing in Secured Transactions Law: Formalism or Functionalism? 457 Catherine Walsh 17. The Floating Charge—An Elegy 479 Riz Mokal Part 5: Controlling Modern Management 18. Contractual Modification of the Duties of a Trustee 513 Michael Bryan 19. Relieving Directors’ Breaches of Duty 529 Rod Edmunds and John Lowry 20. Enron and the Long Shadow of Stat. 13 Eliz. 565 Douglas G Baird Commentary: Kevin E Davis Contents vii Part 6: Moving Forward: Law and Practice 21. Commercial Law and the Limits of the Black Letter Approach 595 Anthony J Duggan Commentary: David Gold 22. The Legal Academy’s Contribution to the Development of Commercial Law: An Anglo-Canadian Perspective 619 Jacob Ziegel Commentary: Tony King 23. Contracts, Contract Law and Reasonable Expectations 651 Robert Bradgate Contributors PROFESSOR WILLIAM T ALLEN, Nusbaum Professor of Law & Business, New York University, USA, Director NYU Center for Law and Business PROFESSOR DOUGLAS G BAIRD, Harry A Bigelow Distinguished Service Professor, University of Chicago, USA DR JOANNA BENJAMIN, Reader in Law, London School of Economics and Political Science, Member of the Bank of England’s Financial Markets Law Committee, and Consultant at Clifford Chance, London, UK WILLIAM BLAIR, QC, 3 Verulam Buildings, London, UK. Visiting Professor, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK PROFESSOR ROBERT BRADGATE, Professor of Commercial Law, Institute for Commercial Law Studies, University of Sheffield, UK PROFESSOR MICHAEL BRIDGE, Professor of Commercial Law and Dean of the Faculty of Laws University College London, and Director of Legal Research at Norton Rose Solicitors, UK PROFESSOR MICHAEL BRYAN, University of Melbourne, Australia PHILLIP CAPPER, Lovells, London, UK PROFESSOR HUGH COLLINS, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK ROSS CRANSTON, QC, MP, Visiting Professor, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK PROFESSOR KEVIN E DAVIS, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto. PROFESSOR SIMON DEAKIN, Robert Monks Professor of Corporate Governance and Fellow of Peterhouse, University of Cambridge, UK. PROFESSOR DEBORAH A DEMOTT, David F Cavers Professor of Law, Duke University School of Law, USA, and, since late 1995, the Reporter for the Restatement Third, Agency. PROFESSOR ANTHONY J DUGGAN, Associate Dean and Iacobucci Chair, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, Canada, and Professorial Fellow, Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne, Australia ROD EDMUNDS, Queen Mary, University of London, UK DAVID GOLD, Head of Litigation and Arbitration, Herbert Smith, London, UK PROFESSOR RICHARD HOOLEY, King’s College, London, UK x Contributors ADRIAN HAMILTON, QC, 7 King’s Bench Walk, formerly Deputy High Court Judge (Commercial and Admiralty Courts), London, UK PADDY IRELAND, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK TONY KING, Head of HR Development, Clifford Chance, London, UK GALYA LEVY, Graduate Fellow, NYU Center for Law & Business, New York University, USA PAUL LOMAS, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, London, UK JOHN LOWRY, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, University of London, UK SIR JONATHAN MANCE, Lord Justice of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales PROFESSOR EWAN McKENDRICK, Professor of English Private Law, University of Oxford, Fellow of Lady Margaret Hall; Barrister, 3 Verulam Buildings, Gray’s Inn, London. PROFESSOR DAVID MILMAN, CMS Cameron McKenna Professor of Corporate and Insolvency Law, Centre for Law and Business, University of Manchester, UK DR RIZWAAN MOKAL, Lecturer in Laws, University College London; Research Associate, Centre for Business Research, Cambridge University, UK GUY MORTON, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, London, UK SIR JOHN MUMMERY, Lord Justice of the Court of Appeal, UK CATHERINE NEWMAN, QC, Maitland Chambers, London, UK DR PHILIP RAWLINGS, University College London, UK LORD JOHAN STEYN, Lord of Appeal in Ordinary, House of Lords, UK DANIEL TAN, Lecturer in Law, Pembroke College, Oxford, UK PROFESSOR CATHERINE WALSH, Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, Canada ANDREW WHITTAKER, General Counsel to the Board, Financial Services Authority, UK PHILIP WOOD, Allen & Overy, Visiting Fellow at Oxford, Cambridge, QM and LSE, University of London, UK PROFESSOR SARAH WORTHINGTON, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK NIK YEO, Barrister, Fountain Court Chambers, Temple, London, UK PROFESSOR JACOB ZIEGEL, Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Toronto, Canada Introduction Aligning Commercial Law and Commercial Practice SARAH WORTHINGTON HIS COLLECTION OF essays is intended to spark debate. The goal is to promote a better dialogue between academics, judges, law T reformers and practitioners, and to initiate a more constructive reassessment of current commercial law and its practices. Both aspects are crucial if the underlying debates are to have a noticeable and worthwhile impact on legal developments. Early drafts of these essays were first dis- cussed at a two-day round-table seminar held at the LSE in November 2002. That early face-to-face debate was merely a preliminary step in exploring these issues. The published collection will take the ideas to a wider audi- ence. This strategy is becoming increasingly common, although the breadth of the agenda behind this collection is novel. I. RECOGNISING NORMS IN ENGLISH COMMERCIAL LAW All of the essays and commentaries in this collection are coordinated around the theme
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Searching for Privacy in a Mixed Jurisdiction
    Searching for Privacy in a Mixed Jurisdiction Hector L. MacQueen* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 73 II. PROTECTING PRIVACY IN SCOTS LAW TO 2000 .................................. 74 III. THE IMPACT OF DOMESTICATED HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ..................... 77 IV. SCOTS LAW: MAKING CHOICES......................................................... 83 A. Breach of Confidence............................................................... 84 B. The Actio Iniuriarum ................................................................ 88 V. ANALYSIS AND QUESTIONS................................................................. 94 VI. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... 97 I. INTRODUCTION Reviewing A History of Private Law in Scotland in the Tulane Law Review in 2004, Shael Herman explained how the collection (published in 2000) left him with an impression of the “eclectic, open-textured character of Scots legal evolution”, even if sometimes he had a “a sense of having toured a juridical Australia or Galapagos Islands inhabited by exotic flora and fauna not found elsewhere”.1 He noted the complexity of the relationship between Scots and English law, and observed: To be sure, between Scotland and England there are striking political and cultural commonalities too numerous to detail. It could hardly be otherwise for two island nations that share a language, a currency, and a border. Yet, as the collection under review shows,
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Queensland Law Journal
    The University of Queensland Law Journal Volume 40(1) 2021 ARTICLES ‘Part of the Future’: Family Law, Children’s Interests and Remote Proceedings in Australia during COVID-19 Felicity Bell Corrective Justice and Redress under Australia’s Racial Vilification Laws Bill Swannie State Consent to the Provision of Humanitarian Assistance in Non-International Armed Conflicts Jessica Schaffer Sexual Assault on Campus: Not Just a Police Matter — A Response to Y v University of Queensland Clare Foran Judicial Activism and Constitutional (Mis)Interpretation: A Critical Appraisal Johnny M Sakr and Augusto Zimmermann BOOK REVIEWS Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania Tony Angelo Legal History Matters: From Magna Carta to the Clinton Impeachment Warren Swain THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND LAW JOURNAL JOURNAL EDITORS RICK BIGWOOD AND IAIN FIELD This issue may be cited as (2021) 40(1) University of Queensland Law Journal ISSN 0083–4041 Copyright of articles published in The University of Queensland Law Journal is vested jointly in the UQLJ and the contributor. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, no part may be reproduced without written permission. However, authors may upload their own published work to online and university repositories, or republish their own work as part of a research thesis, without prior approval from the editors provided due acknowledgment is given to the UQLJ. The University of Queensland Law Journal Volume 40 2021 Number 1 EDITORIAL BOARD Professor Andrew Burrows, University
    [Show full text]
  • Raymond Wacks *
    Volume 1, Issue 3, September 2004 ‘Private Facts’: Is Naomi Campbell a Good Model? * Raymond Wacks Abstract This article analyses the implications of the Naomi Campbell case for the protection of privacy and the long gestation process of a common law privacy tort. DOI: 10.2966/scrip.010304.420 © Raymond Wacks 2004. All Rights Reserved. Please note that this work is NOT an open access work and that all reproduction, publication and modification of the work is prohibited. * Professor of Law and Legal Theory, University of Hong Kong. (2004) 1:3 SCRIPT-ed 421 A common law privacy tort has been long in gestation. For almost four decades, the courts have danced around the problem. A number of cases involving pop stars , film stars, and other celebrities, have been pleaded, mostly unsuccessfully, in equity as breaches of confidence, and, while the relationship between this remedy and a tort of privacy, has been widely acknowledged, the highest court has only this year been presented with an opportunity to declare what the law is. In the interim, the enactment of the Data Protection Act, and especially the Human Rights Act, has served as an significant catalyst for a final reckoning. The result is, however, disappointing. The House of Lords in Naomi Campbell v MGN Limited has offered a less than clear guide on the central question of what constitutes ‘private facts’ in a case where they have been gratuitously publicised. The purpose of this brief paper is to suggest that, until this vital matter is elucidated, the future of a privacy tort of public disclosure of private facts is likely to be unsatisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptualising Surveillance Harms in the Context of Political Protest: Privacy, Autonomy and Freedom of Assembly
    Conceptualising surveillance harms in the context of political protest: privacy, autonomy and freedom of assembly Valerie Aston Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of Law September 2018 Abstract This thesis considers the human rights issues arising from the use of police surveillance of political activists on demonstrations. Such protests are routinely subject to intensive forms of visible, or ‘overt’, surveillance, including the use of dedicated ‘intelligence gathering’ teams to monitor, photograph and film participants. The courts – both domestic and in Strasbourg - have generally taken the view that such measures will not, in themselves, amount to an interference with a person’s right to privacy or their right to freedom of assembly. This thesis takes issue with this approach and offers a new, and more developed conceptualisation of the harms to privacy and to assembly rights arising from police surveillance activities. The thesis draws on interviews with around 30 individuals, each of whom have been subjected to police surveillance in the context of political protest. Testimony from interviewees demonstrates a complex matrix of harms arising from overt surveillance practices which have not been adequately recognised within the human rights framework, nor have been adequately regulated by statute or common law. The thesis suggests a new conceptualisation of surveillance harms, which acknowledges the capacity of surveillance to result in a loss of autonomy, identity and integrity; and also to disrupt and obstruct the mobilisation processes which make protest possible. Harms must be recognised, it is argued, as arising both within the framework of privacy, and the right to freedom of assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Agents Behaving Badly
    Agents Behaving Badly Sarah Worthington* Current Legal Issues Seminar, Queensland Supreme Court, 10 September 2015 Chief Justice, Judges, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. A. Introduction – macro and micro problems in corporate attribution My talk tonight is on agents – in particular, agents behaving badly. I’ve chosen this topic because of its importance. Modern business is routinely transacted by agents. That is inevitably so when the transaction involves a company. The relevant legal rules on attribution and agency are thus an indispensable element of modern commerce. They are well established, well used and, one might expect, well settled. It might then seem preposterous to suggest that in England these rules on corporate contracting are descending into an unholy muddle. But that is the thesis of my lecture tonight. I know this talk would be controversial if presented in the UK. Perhaps it will be so here. And yet I don’t think I’m about to say anything which deviates very much from what I was taught – or what I thought I was taught (I do appreciate the difference) – as an undergraduate at the University of Queensland some time ago. These modern English problems are neither trifling nor tangential. I’ve divided my lecture in two, looking at both macro and micro issues. First, at the macro level there are problems with the very foundations of attribution in corporate law.1 The key attribution question is easy: whose acts will count as the acts of the company?2 But arriving at the right answer is sometimes extraordinarily difficult. This is especially so when the * Downing Professor of the Laws of England, University of Cambridge, and Fellow of Trinity College.
    [Show full text]
  • HRH the Duchess of Sussex V Associated Newspapers
    Neutral Citation Number: [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch) Case No: IL-2019-000110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIST Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down by the judge remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date of hand-down is deemed to be as shown opposite: Date: 11 February 2021 Before: THE HON. MR JUSTICE WARBY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: HRH The Duchess of Sussex Claimant - and - Associated Newspapers Limited Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ian Mill QC, Justin Rushbrooke QC, Jane Phillips and Jessie Bowhill (instructed by Schillings International LLP) for the Claimant Antony White QC, Adrian Speck QC, Alexandra Marzec, Isabel Jamal and Gervase de Wilde (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 19-20 January 2021 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch) Approved Judgment Mr Justice Warby: The action and the application 1. The claimant is well known as the actor, Meghan Markle, who played a leading role in the television series Suits. But she is also well known as the Duchess of Sussex, and wife of HRH Prince Henry of Wales, the Duke of Sussex (“Prince Harry”). The couple were married on 19 May 2018. The relationship between the claimant and her father, Thomas Markle, was difficult at the time. Three months after the wedding, on 27 August 2018, the claimant sent her father a five-page letter (“the Letter”).
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Press Freedom Through Greater Privacy Law: a UK Perspective on an Australian Privacy Tort
    This is a repository copy of Enhancing Press Freedom through Greater Privacy Law: A UK Perspective on an Australian Privacy Tort. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/83154/ Version: Published Version Article: Wragg, PM orcid.org/0000-0003-3869-408X (2014) Enhancing Press Freedom through Greater Privacy Law: A UK Perspective on an Australian Privacy Tort. Sydney Law Review, 36 (4). pp. 619-641. ISSN 0082-0512 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Enhancing Press Freedom through Greater Privacy Law: A UK Perspective on an Australian Privacy Tort Paul Wragg Abstract In light of previous inquiries identifying areas of concern in Australia’s privacy law provisions, the Australian Law Reform Commission (‘ALRC’) recently devised a new tort that, if implemented, would better protect individuals from serious invasions of privacy. Although the tort was designed principally with new technologies in mind, there has been vociferous concern that such a tort might unduly inhibit press freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of Victoria and Melbourne Law School
    Current Issues in Commercial Law Date Monday, 9 September 2013 Venue Banco Court, Supreme Court of Victoria 210 Williams St, Melbourne Time 2.30pm – 5.00pm Cost $220 (incl GST) 2:30pm-2:45pm Welcome The Hon Justice Marilyn Warren, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Victoria, and Professor Carolyn Evans, Dean, Melbourne Law School 2:45pm-3.30pm “Fiduciary Breaches: The Endless Wrangling over Remedies” Speaker: Professor Sarah Worthington, University of Cambridge Comment: The Hon Justice Marcia Neave AO Chair: The Hon Justice John Digby 3.30pm-4.15pm “Commercial Litigation and the Adversarial System – Time to Move On” Speaker: The Hon John Doyle AC QC Comment: The Hon Ray Finklestein QC Chair: The Hon Justice Simon Whelan 4:15pm-5.00pm “The Evidence Act and Developments in Legal Professional Privilege” Speaker: Dr Sue McNicol SC Comment: The Hon Justice Tim Ginnane Chair: The Hon Tim Smith QC 5:00pm Refreshments in the Supreme Court Library THIS EVENT IS A JOINT INITIATIVE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA AND MELBOURNE LAW SCHOOL Professor Sarah Worthington QC (hon) FBA is the Downing Professor of the Laws of England at the University of Cambridge, a Fellow of Trinity College and academic member of the 3-4 South Square, Gray’s Inn. She was made a Fellow of the British Academy in 2009. Her main research interests are in commercial equity and company law, especially secured financing and governance issues. She is a Bencher of Middle Temple and a Panel Member of PRIME Finance. She has worked with law reform bodies in the United Kingdom, Europe and Australia, including serving as a member of the Advisory Council for the Study Group for a European Civil Code, consultant to the UK Law Commission, and member of working groups of the Bank of England Financial Markets Law Committee and the UK Company Law Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infoimation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available UMI THE ANTEBELLUM COLLEGE IN THE OLD NORTHWEST: HIGHER EDUCATION AND THE DEFINING OF THE MIDWEST DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kenneth H.
    [Show full text]
  • Wai L Rev 2016-1 Internals.Indd
    Waikato Law Review TAUMAURI VOLUME 24, 2016 Mihi and Tribute to Matiu Dickson v Judge Craig Coxhead Introduction and Dedication to Matiu Dickson viii Linda Te Aho and Gay Morgan Has the New Zealand Criminal Justice System Been Compromised? [Harkness Henry Lecture] 1 Sir Ron Young Closing Geographical Distances: The value of a New Zealand perspective on the Admission Policy of a Native Hawaiian School 14 Dr Keakaokawai Varner Hemi First Laws: The Challenge and Promise of Teaching Indigenous Laws in Australian Law Schools 43 Brooke Greenwood Māori Rights to Freshwater: The Three Conceptual Models of Indigenous Rights 58 Andrew Erueti A Freshwater Allocation to Iwi: Is It Possible under the Resource Management Act 1991? 81 Lara Burkhardt The Utilisation of Law Commission Reports 97 Sir Grant Hammond The Commissioner of Inland Revenue’s Statutory Duty to Collect the Highest Net Revenue 108 Joel Manyam Homeless Youths’ “Street Families” in Aotearoa New Zealand’s Youth Justice System 124 Selwyn Fraser Proposals to Address Privacy Violations and Surveillance by Unmanned Aerial Systems 142 Andrew V Shelley Book Review: Handbook of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights 171 Linda Te Aho Editors in Chief Linda Te Aho and Gay Morgan Editorial Assistance Mary-Rose Russell Senior Student Editor Carey Church Student Editors Nicole Morrall, Jessie Ormsby, Aref Shams EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Chief Justice, The Honourable Dame Sian Elias (honorary member), Chief Justice of New Zealand. Professor John Borrows, JD (Toronto), PhD (Osgoode Hall), LL.D (Dalhousie), FRSC, Professor, Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Law, Nexen Chair in Indigenous Leadership, University of Victoria, (Canada). Associate Professor T Brettel Dawson, Department of Law, Carleton University, Academic Director, National Judicial Institute (Canada).
    [Show full text]
  • Clarendon Law Series
    Clarendon law SerieS Edited by PaUl CRAIG Clarendon law SerieS The Anthropology of Law Philosophy of Private Law FERNANDA PIRIE WILLIAM LUCY Law and Gender Law in Modern Society JOANNE CONAGHAN DENIS GALLIGAN The Conflict of Laws (3rd edition) An Introduction to Tort Law ADRIAN BRIGGS (2nd edition) TONY WEIR The Concept of Law (3rd edition) H.L.A. HART Equity (2nd edition) With a Postscript edited by Penelope SARAH WORTHINGTON A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz Atiyah’s Introduction to the Law of With an Introduction and Notes by Contract (6th edition) Leslie Green STEPHEN A. SMITH, P.S. ATIYAH Land Law (2nd edition) Unjust Enrichment (2nd edition) ELIZABETH COOKE PETER BIRKS Administrative Law (5th edition) An Introduction to Family Law PETER CANE (2nd edition) Discrimination Law (2nd edition) GILLIAN DOUGLAS SANDRA FREDMAN Criminal Justice An Introduction to the Law of Trusts LUCIA ZEDNER (3rd edition) Contract Theory SIMON GARDNER STEPHEN A. SMITH Natural Law and Natural Rights Public Law (2nd edition) ADAM TOMKINS JOHN FINNIS Personal Property Law (3rd edition) Introduction to Company Law MICHAEL BRIDGE (2nd edition) PAUL DAVIES Law of Property (3rd edition) F.H. LAWSON AND Employment Law (2nd edition) BERNARD RUDDEN HUGH COLLINS An Introduction to Constitutional Law International Law ERIC BARENDT VAUGHAN LOWE Resulting Trusts Civil Liberties ROBERT CHAMBERS CONOR GEARTY Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Intellectual Property NEIL MACCORMICK MICHAEL SPENCE Labour Legislation and Public Policy Policies and Perceptions of Insurance Law A Contemporary History in the Twenty-First Century (2nd edition) PAUL DAVIES AND MALCOLM CLARKE MARK FREEDLAND PerSonal ProPerty law FoUrth edition MiCHAEL BRIDGe FBa Bencher of the Middle Temple, Cassel Professor of Commercial Law, London School of Economics, and Professor of Law National University of Singapore Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Law in Transition
    Law in transition Advancing legal reform Spring 2001 Concessions Mobilising private finance for development A decade of legal transition EBRD’s first General Counsel reflects Rebuilding Yugoslavia’s infrastructure How the concessions regime works Maribor waste water project A case study of concession financing Law in transition Advancing legal reform Spring 2001 Contents General Counsel of the EBRD EBRD's legal transition assistance: 10 years of evolution 1 Andre Newburg, first General Counsel of EBRD Emmanuel Maurice Corporate governance: regulating board-level management of enterprises 2 Co-Editors-in-Chief Sarah Worthington, Senior Lecturer in Law, London School of Economics and Political Science Gerard Sanders, David Bernstein Bosnia and Herzegovina's continuing struggle: legal and 11 institutional challenges in the post-Dayton era Focus Editor Francis Delaey, Counsel, EBRD Walid Labadi Overview of Uzbekistan’s Civil Code 16 Ikram Zokirov, Professor of Civil Law, Tashkent Law University The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is an international institution Production Editor Nodir Akhmedjanov, Postgraduate Student, Nagoya University Law Department whose members comprise 60 countries, the European Community and the European Investment Bank. Anila Gramshi Focus on concessions 19 The EBRD operates in the countries of central and eastern Europe and the Commonwealth A favourable concessions regime: a lender’s perspective 20 of Independent States committed to multiparty democracy, pluralism, and market economies. Consultant
    [Show full text]